Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Outline
1 Description 3
2 Finite Element Model 6
2.1 Geometry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.2 Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
2.3 Supports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.4 Loads . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
2.5 Initial Fields . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.6 Mesh . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.6.1 Extra Geometry for Mesh Refinement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.6.2 Mesh Properties . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
3 Enthalpy-poroelastic Analysis 38
3.1 Commands . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
3.2 Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
3.2.1 Temperatures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
3.2.2 Ice Fractions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
3.2.3 Darcy Flux . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Appendix A Additional Information 50
Artificial ground freezing is a technology that can provide temporary support and/or waterproof layer for geotechnical engineering construction projects.
This tutorial illustrates how to model freezing in the presence of groundwater flow. The ground freezing problem is modeled with the enthalpy-poroelastic analysis procedure in D IANA.
This application is based on a coupled multidimensional thermo-hydraulic approach that considers freeze-thaw processes, groundwater flow and heat transfer mechanisms1 .
The finite element model presented in this tutorial considers the following phenomena:
1
For more information on enthalpy-poroelastic analysis see D IANA Documentation.
• the geometry consists of a layer of soil with 85 m length and 30 m height, in which twelve freezing pipes are installed around a ring wall with a radius of 3 m [Fig. 2]
• the diameter of the freezing pipes is 0.1 m [Fig. 2]
• in terms of the initial conditions, the soil temperature is 10° C
• for the flow boundary conditions, a fixed head of 10% is considered along the up gradient (left) and down gradient (right) faces and, zero flux (no flow) conditions are considered in
the other locations
• for the thermal boundaries the following conditions are considered
– imposed temperatures of -20° C on the edges of the twelve freezing pipes
– constant temperature of 10° C on all other boundaries.
Figure 1: Geometry of the model Figure 2: Detail of the twelve freezing pipes and ring wall
Parameter Value
Elasticity parameters Young’s modulus E N/m2 1.8e+08
Poisson’s ratio ν [-] 0.3
Mass density (dry) ρs [kg/m3 ] 1835
Density of ice ρice [kg/m3 ] 920
Porosity n [-] 0.41
Thermal expansion coefficient solid αs [/ °C] 5e-06
Thermal expansion coefficient fluid αf [/ °C] 7e-05
Enthalpy, freezing parameters Solid heat conductivity λs [W/m°C] 4
Liquid water heat conductivity λlw [W/m°C] 0.6
Ice heat conductivity λice [W/m°C] 2.14
Specific hear capacity cps [J/kg °C] 860
Residual unfrozen water content S ∗ [-] 0.05
Exponent a [/ °C2 ] -4
Bulk freezing temperature Tf [°C] 0
Modified initial permeability k 0 [m3 s/kg] 1.18e-09
Rel. permeability ice-water mixture parameter η [-] 7.5
Intrinsic bulk modulus of the non-porous solid Ks [N/m2 ] 5e+13
Intrinsic bulk modulus of the fluid Kf [N/m2 ] 3.7e+09
Figure 4: New project dialog Figure 5: Geometry browser - reference system Figure 6: Property panel - units
D IANA IE
Figure 9: Add circle sheet - excavation area Figure 10: Geometry view Figure 11: Add circle sheet - freezing wall Figure 12: Geometry view
D IANA IE
Figure 15: Add circle sheet - pipe Figure 16: Geometry view
Main menu Geometry Modify Array copy [Fig. 17] [Fig. 18]
Figure 21: Assign properties to the soil Figure 22: Add material Figure 23: Edit material
Three types of supports are considered in the model to simulate the boundary conditions:
Figure 28: Fixed enthalpies Figure 29: Edges around the pipes
Figure 30: Fixed pressure potentials Figure 31: Lateral boundary edges of the soil
D IANA IE
Figure 34: Inflow pressure potential Figure 35: Time curve Figure 36: Left boundary edge of the soil
D IANA IE
Figure 37: Enthalpy freezing pipes - add Figure 38: Time curve Figure 39: Edges around the pipes
D IANA IE
Figure 40: Enthalpy freezing pipes - remove Figure 41: Time curve Figure 42: Edges around the pipes
Before defining the mesh properties we create some extra geometry entities to be used in the refinement of the mesh. The idea is that we have a finer mesh around the freezing pipes
and the excavation tunnel that becomes increasingly larger in the freezing wall and in the surrounding soil mass. We do this in order to optimize the computation time, having a finer mesh
in the location where the freezing process occurs.
We first define the geometry for refinement around the freezing pipes. For that we create small rings around the freezing pipes with circumferential and radial edges. To do this we first
create one circle around one pipe and two lines that divide the circle into four equal parts.
D IANA IE
Figure 45: Add circle Figure 46: Add line Figure 47: Add line Figure 48: Geometry view - one small ring
Figure 49: Array copy Figure 50: Geometry view - small rings
D IANA IE
Figure 51: Shape projection Figure 52: Geometry view - small rings Figure 53: Cut shapes Figure 54: Circumferential and radial edges
Figure 55: Add straight line 1 Figure 57: Add straight line 3
Figure 56: Add straight line 2 Figure 58: Add straight line 4
Figure 59: Shape projection - imprint Figure 60: Geometry of the model
We now define the mesh properties for the different parts of the model:
• tunnel excavation area with desired element size of 0.25 m [Fig. 61 to 62]
• ring of the freezing wall with 0.75 m
• circumferential edges of the small rings around the freezing pipes with 4 divisions
• radial edges of the small rings around the freezing pipes with 8 divisions
• surrounding area of the soil closest to the freezing ring wall with desired element size of 1 m
• boundary areas of the soil with desired element size of 2.25 m
Main menu Geometry Mesh Mesh properties [Fig. 61] [Fig. 62]
Main menu Geometry Mesh Mesh properties [Fig. 63] [Fig. 64]
Main menu Geometry Mesh Mesh properties [Fig. 65] [Fig. 66]
Figure 65: Mesh properties Figure 66: Small rings - circumferential edges
Main menu Geometry Mesh Mesh properties [Fig. 67] [Fig. 68]
Figure 67: Mesh properties Figure 68: Small rings - radial edges
Main menu Geometry Mesh Mesh properties [Fig. 69] [Fig. 70]
Main menu Geometry Mesh Mesh properties [Fig. 71] [Fig. 72]
D IANA IE
Main menu Geometry Mesh Generate mesh [Fig. 73] [Fig. 74]
Figure 73: Finite element mesh Figure 74: Finite element mesh - detail of the freezing area
Figure 75: Analysis browser Figure 76: Command menu Figure 77: Analysis browser
Analysis browser Artificial ground freezing Structural nonlinear Nonlinear effects Edit properties [Fig. 78]
Analysis browser Artificial ground freezing Structural nonlinear new execute block Remove
Analysis browser Artificial ground freezing Structural nonlinear Add... Execute steps - Start steps
Analysis browser Artificial ground freezing Structural nonlinear new execute block Rename Initial state [Fig. 81]
Analysis browser Artificial ground freezing Structural nonlinear Initial state Start steps Edit properties [Fig. 82]
Analysis browser Artificial ground freezing Structural nonlinear Initial state Equilibrium iteration Edit properties [Fig. 83]
Figure 81: Analysis browser Figure 82: Start steps properties Figure 83: Equilibrium iteration properties
Analysis browser Artificial ground freezing Structural nonlinear Add... Execute steps - Time steps
Analysis browser Artificial ground freezing Structural nonlinear new execute block Rename Time sequence [Fig. 84]
Analysis browser Artificial ground freezing Structural nonlinear Time sequence Time steps Edit properties [Fig. 85]
Analysis browser Artificial ground freezing Structural nonlinear Time sequence Equilibrium iteration Edit properties [Fig. 87]
Figure 86: Analysis browser Figure 87: Equilibrium iteration properties Figure 88: Force convergence norm settings
Analysis browser Artificial ground freezing Structural nonlinear Output Edit properties [Fig. 89] Result User selection Modify
Main menu Analysis Run selected analysis
Figure 89: Analysis browser Figure 90: Output properties Figure 91: Results selection
3.2.1 Temperatures
We present the development of temperatures in the soil for four time periods in the analysis: 1.1 days, 2 days, 12 days and 202 days. To better interpret the results we use specified
values for the color scale limits (-3 °C for minimum value and 10 °C for maximum value) and 19 contour levels. We can observe that the frozen part (phase change) is not symmetric and
this is due to the coupled thermal and groundwater flow effects. The expansion of the frozen part causes change in the permeability of the soil which, in its turn, affects the groundwater
flow response.
D IANA IE
Figure 92: Temperatures for t = 1.1 days Figure 93: Temperatures for t = 2 days Figure 94: Temperatures for t = 12 days Figure 95: Temperatures for t = 202 days
Figure 96: Temperatures for t = 202 days Figure 97: Temperatures for t = 202 days - detail of the freezing area
We present the development of the ice fractions for the same analysis times. These results are linked with the temperature gradients [Fig. 92 to 95]. The ice part increases with time and
in a non symmetrical way. To better interpret the results we use specified values for the color scale limits (0 for minimum value and 1 for maximum value) and 19 contour levels.
D IANA IE
Results browser Artificial ground freezing Output Element results Ice fractions ICEFRA [Fig. 98] – [Fig. 101]
Figure 98: Ice fraction field for t = 1.1 days Figure 99: Ice fraction field for t = 2 days Figure 100: Ice fraction field for t = 12 days Figure 101: Ice fraction field for t = 202 days
Figure 102: Ice fraction field for t = 202 days Figure 103: Ice fraction field for t = 202 days - detail of the freezing area
We present the development of the Darcy flux for the same analysis times. As consequence of the frosting of soil, the Darcy flux increases with time. To better interpret the results we
use specified values for the color scale limits (0 for minimum value and 4.32e-6 for maximum value) and 19 contour levels.
D IANA IE
Results browser Artificial ground freezing Output Element results Darcy flux DFXYZ [Fig. 104] – [Fig. 107]
Figure 104: Darcy flux field for t = 1.1 days Figure 105: Darcy flux field for t = 12 days Figure 106: Darcy flux field for t = 2 days Figure 107: Darcy flux field for t = 202 days
Figure 108: Darcy flux field for t = 202 days Figure 109: Darcy flux field for t = 202 days - detail of the freezing area
Folder: Tutorials/GroundFreezing
Keywords:
ANALYS : nonlin physic transi.
CLASS : large.
CONSTR : displa initia suppor.
ELEMEN : pstrai q8eps t6eps.
LOAD : deform time.
MATERI : conduc elasti isotro permea porosi.
OPTION : backwa direct newton nonsym regula units.
POST : binary ndiana.
PRE : dianai.
RESULT : displa pressu temper total.