Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Combating Turbulence On The Sea - Marine Insurance
Combating Turbulence On The Sea - Marine Insurance
11
a
November 2012
ilfim ~ 3fR ~ ~
Editorial Board
J. Hari Narayan
R. K. Nair
S.V. Mony
V. Manickam
R. Chandrasekaran
Vepa Kamesam
Ashvin Parekh
Editor
U. Jawaharlal
A
daunting factor that insurers confront and Considering the huge possibility of fraudulent
grapple with on a regular basis is the problem transactions across borders, the international
of insurance frauds. While the problem has a conventions have been comprehensively designed,
universal spread, it is more bothersome in markets that taking into account all the aspects of global trade.
are marked by an incidence of low awareness; as also However, the implementation of the same may not be
where the punitive measures adopted are not in its entirety in a few domains; and it is here that
deterrent enough to discourage such attempts. The deceitful acts can occur. Insurers should be doubly
Indian insurance domain suffers from both these careful while dealing with transactions occurring in
constraints; and it is significantly high in some classes such known areas of operation and geography. Further,
where constant supervision as regards the insured it is always essential that underwriters are updated
commodity is not altogether feasible. with the latest changes in the domain of cross-border
trade so that they are not faced with avoidable losses
Marine insurance has always been one class where the
and penalties for a possible infringement.
incidence of several limiting factors contributes
towards a high level of fraudulent trends. At the outset, ‘Marine Insurance’ is once again the focus of this issue
as the merchandise moves between a set of countries of the Journal. One area of operation where the
and on the high seas, it is subject to rapid changes with business levels have been steadily growing, on one
regard to ownership and the quality of cargo; and the hand; and in which the operational problems continue
way it is handled by the shippers and their agents. This to exist, on the other, is Health insurance. The focus of
would put an additional onus on underwriters to word the next issue of the Journal will be on ‘Health
their contracts carefully so that any inherent attempts Insurance’.
to camouflage a fraudulent transaction are nipped in
the bud. There is need for extra caution especially when
the vessels meant for the adventure are well beyond
their prime; and also when the flags they fly are of
dubious distinction. J. Hari Narayan
inside
issue focus
[7
04
Statistics - Life Insurance
27 Dealing with Piracy
Prashansa Daga
[7
06
In the Air
29 Getting the Basics Right
N. M. Behera
[7
21
Vantage Point
U. Jawaharlal
[7
40
thou chek esa ifjokn izdj.k
gw~moY Hw$_ma Ed§ hare MÝÐ
Thinking cap [7
46
Statistics - Non-Life Insurance
[7
47
Round up
[7
49
Statistical Supplement (Monthly)
from the editor
-i
------------------------ -
Endless Challenges
- Marine Insurance
D
oesn’t it sound ironical that the successfully. History has taught us an Sea piracy has been a hotly debated
very same activity that gave birth important lesson that the flag that the subject for anyone involved with Marine
to the entire concept of insurance vessel flies is to a great extent indicative of insurance. Ms. Prashansa Daga discusses
is now a hard nut to crack for the insurers the inherent quality. Care must be taken to the role of insurance in and its positive
and underwriters? Sea piracy has been an ensure that a ‘flag of convenience’ is not a contribution to the shipping industry in
age old phenomenon that bothered cover for a ‘flag of connivance’. dealing with this very sensitive area of
everyone associated with cross-border operation. In the last article on issue focus,
Sea routes have also been used as a
mercantile deals. The fact that it was Mr. N. M. Behera brings into discussion the
convenient medium for perpetrating such
limited only to certain sea routes also aspects where Marine insurance differs
large scale crimes like terrorism, drug
afforded the possibility of avoiding such from other classes even in some basic
trafficking and money laundering. While
routes. However, considering the fact that principles that govern insurance
underwriting a business proposal under
some of the most desired routes contracts. In the end, we have a research
Marine insurance, underwriters must be
themselves are directly in the firing line, it based essay in the ‘Thinking Cap’ section
doubly careful that they are not caught in
is not always a viable alternative. For by a hard core academician Dr. N.
the complex network of such criminal
example, just imagine a cargo vessel Sivakumar who emphasizes that
activities. Looking at so many challenges,
having to circumvent the entire coast of notwithstanding the present levels of
there is no wonder that Marine insurance
Africa instead of taking the shorter Suez growth of various classes, there is need for
has become a very niche domain, and
Canal route. It would involve a innovation in ensuring that the Indian
practitioners have attained ‘super-
tremendous amount of wastage of insurance industry demonstrates a
speciality’ status.
resources – time, money and energy. sustained performance during the years
‘Marine Insurance’ is the focus of this issue to come.
Marine underwriters have to carefully
of the Journal. We open the debate with
weigh all these factors while taking a While it has been maintaining reasonably
an article by Mr. G.V. Rao which talks about
decision. Further, there are factors good levels of growth over the last few
the positive merits of Marine insurance as
uniquely applicable to the domain of years, there is something unique and
a class in the area of global trade and
Marine insurance which would also test strange about Health insurance as a class.
commerce. The amazing points of Marine
the skills of the underwriters. Apart from We will get to know from several
insurance are an endless topic for debate
the routes that the vessels are scheduled practitioners on the ‘what’ and ‘how’ of
about its various hues and colours. Prof.
to take, the kind of the vessel by which the this enigmatic sector in the next issue of
Shubhro S. Chakrabarti picks up one of
cargo is scheduled to be transported also the Journal that focuses on ‘Health
these issues for discussion as to whether
has a huge bearing; as the age, the sea- Insurance’.
the offshore drilling rigs should be treated
worthiness and the efficiency of the
on an equal footing with ships or ocean-
vessels also are highly important to
going vessels, in the next article. U. Jawaharlal
ensure that the voyage is completed
■4
irda journal November 2012
Report Card:LIFE
First Year Premium of Life Insurers for the Period ended September, 2012
Sl Insurer Premium u/w (` in Crores) No. of Policies / Schemes No. of lives covered under Group Schemes
No. Sep, 12 Upto Sep, 12 Upto Sep, 11 Sep, 12 Upto Sep, 12 Upto Sep, 11 Sep, 12 Upto Sep, 12 Upto Sep, 11
1 Bajaj Allianz
Individual Single Premium 27.93 123.46 183.87 2582 15419 20499
Individual Non-Single Premium 109.34 414.81 468.91 62222 296458 422558
Group Single Premium 68.01 268.32 102.37 27 113 41 957595 2789875 99613
Group Non-Single Premium 46.82 328.18 182.07 18 140 446 62856 3005486 4890228
2 ING Vysya
Individual Single Premium 37.47 97.25 11.21 76 1168 1210
Individual Non-Single Premium 45.97 199.08 253.99 17681 82000 108935
Group Single Premium 0.04 0.46 1.15 0 0 0 8 88 233
Group Non-Single Premium 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0 0 0
3 Reliance Life
statistics life insurance
Note: 1. Cumulative premium / No.of policies upto the month is net of cancellations which may occur during the free look period.
2. Compiled on the basis of data submitted by the Insurance companies
■5
irda journal November 2012
in the air
Penalty
Ref:IRDA/Life/ORD/Misc/228/10/2012 Date:05-10-2012
Directions under Section 34 of the action onthe Corporate Agents and the before issuance of the Group
Insurance Act, 1938 - In the matter of Master Policy Holders, the onus of which it Insurance Guidelines is considered.
M/s SBI Life Insurance Company Limited was stated, equally lies with the Life
3. that it has filed a new product with the
Insurer.
Whereas Clause C-4 of Guidelines on Authority to replace the then existing
Group Insurance Policies given in Circular Whereas the Authority has taken note of one on 28th September, 2006 for
No. 015/IRDA/Life/Circular/GI the submissions of the Life Insurer in this which a final approval was received
Guidelines/2005 dated 14th July regard vide letters dated 17th February from IRDA on 05th November, 2007 is
2005prescribes that there shall be no 2011, and 30th March 2011 and also both also taken into consideration.
other payment whether as management written and oral submissions made
4. inability expressed by the Life Insurer
expenses or documentation expenses or during the personal hearing accorded on
to recover the wrongful payments
profit commission or bulk discount or 9th May, 2012 which are as under:
from respective Master Policy Holders
payment of any description, to the agent
1. that Life Insurer has entered into
or corporate agent or group organizer or Whereas upon taking note of the Life
arrangements / agreements with
group manager. Insurer’s submissions, it has come to
Master Policy Holders and agreed to
the following conclusions
Whereas M/s SBI Life Insurance Company pay administrative fee in
Ltd [hereinafter called Life Insurer] had consideration of various services, inter a) that majority of the functions stated to
made certain payments towards alia, dispatching mailers to customers, have been assigned to Master Policy
reimbursement of Group Administration collecting membership forms, Holders was anyway part of their
Expenses to various master policy holders. remitting premia, to make aware the [Master Policy Holders’] responsibility
members their rights and obligations, for administering a Group Insurance
Whereas the above payments made by
maintenance of customer data, Scheme.
the Life Insurer were in violation of Clause
answering customer queries and
C-4 mentioned above, for which the b) that there was no case for the Insurer
facilitating claim process are found
Authority had imposed a penalty of Rs 70 to assign core activities to Master
not agreeable.
lakh vide Order dated 8th July 2011. Policy Holders that are to be
2. that the said payments relate to a discharged by themselves during the
Whereas the above Order of the Authority
product called ‘Super Suraksha’ that course of their doing Group Insurance
was without prejudice to initiate further
was launched in the year 2002, well business. Even if such activities were
~
Sl No. Master Policy Holder 2007- 08 (Nov - Mar) 2008-09 2009-10 (April- Aug) Total
1 State Bank of India 1695.11 3081.56 432.03 5208.70
I2 State Bank of Hyderabad 159.43 354.05 61.00 574.47
l3 State Bank of Indore* 50.91 125.01 12.21 188.13
I4 State Bank of Mysore 133.57 204.59 14.15 352.31
r5 State Bank of Patiala 78.43 79.01 2.00 159.44
I6 State Bank of Travancore 218.99 472.08 62.26 753.34
I7 State Bank of Bikaner and Jaipur 68.44 215.25 34.36 318.04
I8 Dewan Housing Finance 48.58 169.62 111.84 330.04
irda journal November 2012
■6
i
.....
!l!!ll!!m!l
assigned to the Master Policy Holders, The above payments are not in the iv. Difference between the original
the guidelines specifically prohibit interests of the policyholders. premium and the recalculated
payment of monies of any sort to premium as in (iii) above to be
Now, therefore, the Authority, after
Master Policy Holders. refunded back to the respective
consultation with the Consultative
members/beneficiaries
c) that the explanation offered by the Committee constituted under Section 110
Life Insurer for not replacing the then G of the Insurance Act, hereby directs as v. The amount to be refunded as
existing product, immediately on under: directed in these orders shall be made
getting approval for a new product by good by the shareholders.
i. Identify the members/beneficiaries as
the Authority is also not tenable in
the case may be of each Master Policy vi. The above action to be initiated
view of the fact that the insurer
against which the Life Insurer has immediately and shall be completed
continued to sell the old product
reimbursed the administrative within 6 months from the date of
much beyond the date of approval
expenses as a percentage of premium. receipt of this order.
accorded to the new product. Such
A list of master policy is attached to
explanation cannot legalize a vii. Cost of the regulatory compliance of
this order as Annexure A;
payment which is prohibited in the this order to be borne by Shareholders
guidelines. ii. Distribute the wrongful administrative of the Life Insurer.
charges paid, amongst the respective
However owing to the nature of the The above directions are issued in exercise
members/beneficiaries of each
business, with regard to the payment of the powers vested in the Authority
Master Policy by way of refund to the
made upto the date of approval of the under Section 34(1)(b) of the Insurance
respective members/beneficiaries;
new product, i.e. upto October 2007 a Act, 1938.
considerate view may be taken. However, iii. For this purpose, recalculate the
(J. Hari Narayan)
such a dispensation cannot be accorded premium chargeable for each Chairman
to the following payments made member of each Group Insurance
subsequent to October 2007 and the Scheme of the Life Insurer without
Authority treats such payment as taking into consideration 20% of
wrongful payments violative of the premium that is paid to Master Policy
guidelines mentioned above. Holders.
Annexure – A
Nov - Mar 2008 2008-09 2009-10 (April-Aug)
Master Policy Entity Brand Admin fee lives Admin fee lives Admin fee
(Actuals) (Actuals) (Actuals) lives
83001000203 State Bank Super Suraksha
of India for Home Loans 15,61,11,433 35,786 28,16,17,047 62,097 3,54,13,725 7,736
83001000301 State Bank Super Suraksha
of Patiala for Home Loans 69,83,211 1,361 65,94,680 1,445 2,40,038 59
83001000409 State Bank Super Suraksha
of Mysore for Home Loans 1,11,28,854 1,970 1,74,49,657 2,836 10,77,796 173
83001000507 State Bank Super Suraksha
of Hyderabad for Home Loans 1,39,85,719 2,983 3,21,15,064 5,757 58,06,488 988
83001000605 State Bank Super Suraksha
Of Indore for Home Loans 44,35,089 693 1,16,83,617 2,145 11,44,668 213
83001000703 Sundaram Super Suraksha
Home Finance for Home Loans 25,03,566 570 58,11,875 1,270 21,91,145 422
83001001002 State Bank Super Suraksha
of Travancore for Home Loans 2,06,21,822 4,577 4,43,15,861 9,791 58,56,890 1,365
83001001110 State Bank of Super Suraksha
Bikaner and Jaipur for Home Loans 42,63,402 941 1,84,91,690 4,009 33,05,318 611
83001001708 State Bank Super Suraksha
I of India for Car Loans 49,54,842 6,315 1,51,07,405 21,509 39,90,489 5,706 I
irda journal November 2012
■7
in the air
I
Nov - Mar 2008 2008-09 2009-10 (April-Aug)
Master Policy Entity Brand Admin fee lives Admin fee lives Admin fee
(Actuals) (Actuals) (Actuals) lives
83001003502 State Bank Super Suraksha
of Travancore for Car Loans 7,73,636 869 24,69,447 2,949 3,69,426 411
83001003610 State Bank Super Suraksha
of India for Tractor Loan 10,72,178 930 18,21,951 1,654 3,28,554 233
83001003904 Union Bank Super Suraksha
for Home Loans 1,26,33,439 2,768 1,95,76,983 4,119 18,07,431 348
83001004105 State Bank Super Suraksha
of Mysore for Tractor Loan 11,68,219 634 19,11,225 1,120 3,36,921 175
83001004203 State Bank Super Suraksha
of Patiala for Tractor Loan - 1,928 1 -
83001004605 State Bank of Super Suraksha
Bikaner and Jaipur for Car Loans 2,49,536 312 8,36,018 1,082 1,30,408 174
83001004703 State Bank of Super Suraksha
Bikaner and Jaipur for Tractor Loan 1,39,379 82 3,75,931 259 42,513 27
83001004801 State Bank Super Suraksha
of Hyderabad for Tractor Loan 16,14,475 950 12,25,395 782 1,26,642 87
83001005306 Dewan Housing Super Suraksha
Finance for Home Loans 48,57,816 1,366 1,69,62,069 3,960 1,11,83,648 2,585
83001005404 Federal Bank Super Suraksha
I for Home Loans 86,43,177 1,541 1,67,544 135 -
83001005502 Karnataka Transport Super Suraksha
Devlopment Finance for Home Loans 19,801 7 49,709 11 3,688 2
83001004301 State Bank Super Suraksha
of Indore for Tractor Loan 3,74,108 3,87,571 24,131
DEPOSITORS State Bank of India Super Suraksha
for Deposit Holders 51,97,032 52,618 78,00,240 80,370 32,85,096 33,523
I SELF HELP State Bank of India Shakti 19,98,050 31,833 16,26,400 32,528 1,84,950 3,699
FARMERS State Bank of India Super Suraksha
for ADB 82,494 2,270 75,798 2,078 1,080 16
SUP. SURAKSHA State Bank of India Super Suraksha 94,750 4,621 1,00,008 2,383 1,800 8
TDR State Bank of India Super Suraksha 21,636 253 7,227 102
DEPOSITORS State Bank of Super Suraksha
Bikaner and Jaipur for Deposit Holders 21,91,368 24,280 18,21,360 19,234 4,992 54
DEPOSITORS State Bank Super Suraksha
Of Indore for Deposit Holders 1,86,648 1,996 1,29,648 1,204 120 1
SELF HELP State Bank of Indore Shakti 500 10 1,750 35 -
FARMERS State Bank Super Suraksha
Of Indore for ADB
SUP. SURAKSHA State Bank Of Indore Super Suraksha
DEPOSITORS State Bank Super Suraksha
of Travancore for Deposit Holders 5,03,856 5,799 3,70,392 3,831 -
SELF HELP State Bank
of Travancore Shakti 10,950 324 14,150 283 3,150 63
FARMERS State Bank
of Travancore Super Suraksha - ADB 5,580 145 3,798 92
SUP. SURAKSHA State Bank
of Travancore Super Suraksha 38,496 427 52,512 592
DEPOSITORS State Bank Super Suraksha
ISELF HELP of Mysore
State Bank
for Deposit Holders 7,65,120 8,202 4,83,240 4,630 6,384 63
■8
i
~----------------ii.ta
Penalty
Ref:IRDA/LIFE/ORD/MISC/230/10/2012 Date:08-10-2012
Final Order in matter of M/s Met Life 2012 at 3.00 PM. Mr. Rajesh Relan, MD&CEO in Central Government and other
India Insurance Company Ltd and his team were present in the hearing. approved security (i.e.50%) in segregated
On behalf of IRDA, Mr. Sriram Taranikanti, level of life fund are not observed -
Based on Reply to Show Cause Notice
FA , M r. S u re s h M a t h u r, S r. Violation of section 27(1) of Insurance Act
D a t e d 0 7 t h O c t o b e r, 2 0 1 1 a n d
JD(Intermediaries), Mr. M. Pulla Rao, Sr. JD and also Regulation 3 of IRDA
Submissions made in Personal Hearing on
(Inspections), Mr. SN Jayasimhan, JD (Investment) Regulations.
March 9th, 2012 at 03.00 PM and April
(Investments), Ms. Mamta, JD (F&A), Ms.
17th 2012 at 3.00 PM at the office of Decision: In response, the insurer
Meena Kumari, HoD(Actl), Mr. V. Jayanth
Insurance Regulatory & Development submitted that as per its understanding
Kumar, JD (Life), Mr D V S Ramesh, D D (Life)
Authority, 3rd Floor, Parishram Bhavanam, the pattern of Investment is only required
and Mrs R Lalita Kumari, A D (Life) were
BasheerBagh, Hyderabad to be maintained at Controlled fund level
present in the personal hearing. The
and not separately at segregated fund
Chaired by Sri J Hari Narayan, Chairman, submissions of the insurer in their written
level. The insurer also confirms that they
IRDA reply to the following charges levelled in
have not breached provision of Section
the Show Cause Notice as also those made
The Insurance Regulatory and 27(1) read with regulation 3 of
during the course of the personal hearing
Development Authority (hereinafter Investment Regulations. Taking into
were taken into account and a decision on
referred to as “the Authority”) carried out account the submissions charges are not
each of the charges is issued hereunder.
an onsite inspection of M/s Met Life India pressed.
Insurance Company Ltd (herein after 1. Charge 1: Insurer is in practice of
3. Charge 3: Industry exposure is
referred to as “the insurer”) from 03rd valuing listed equity shares only on the
calculated taking into account the total
January, 2011 to 07th January, 2011 which basis of last quoted closing price on the
fund size as a whole as against
inter-alia revealed violations of the NSE as against measuring at the lowest
considering ‘investment which is subject
provisions of the Insurance Act, 1938 (the quoted closing price at the listed stock
to the exposure norms (i.e. excluding G Sec
Act), various regulations/ exchanges - Violation of Para 6 (c) of
and other approved securities)’ - Violation
guidelines/circulars issued by the Schedule A to IRDA (Preparation of
of Regulation 5 & 6 of IRDA (Investments)
Authority. Financial Statement) Regulations, 2002.
Regulations.
The Authority forwarded the copy of the Decision: In response to the charge the
Decision: The insurer, in response,
inspection report to the insurer under the insurer submitted that the observation
submitted that as required under
cover of letter dated 22nd February, 2011 related to IRDA (Preparation of Financial
Regulation 5 and Note no 5 of IRDA
and sought the comments of the insurer Statement) regulations para 6 (c) which is
(Investment) Regulations, exposure limits
to the same. Upon examining the applicable to Non Linked funds. Further,
are maintained at Investment assets level
submissions made by the insurer vide the insurer confirmed that they do not
and further submitted that the
letter dated March 17th 2011, the have any Equity Investment under non-
investments made do not breach the
Authority called for further information linked funds and equity Investments
industry exposure limits stipulated. On
vide its letter dated 12th May, 2011 which valuation under linked funds is being
considering the submissions, the charge is
was responded to by the insurer vide done at last quoted closing price on the
not pressed.
letters dated 26th May, 2011. Finally, the NSE. On examining the submissions it is
irda journal November 2012
Authority issued notice to show-cause reiterated that the referred provision is 4. Charge 4: The Insurer has not included
dated 07th October, 2011 which was equally applicable to linked policies. While transactions with J&K Bank Ltd in ‘related
responded to by the insurer vide letter not pressing the charges, the Insurer is party disclosure’ in annual report for the
dated 15th November, 2011. As per the hereby directed to scrupulously adhere to year 2009-10. And also investments to the
request, a personal hearing was given to the referred regulations in future. tune of Rs 11.90 Crores made in J&K Bank
the insurer by Chairman, IRDA on March as on 31.3.10 are not disclosed/
2. Charge 2: In case of some of the funds,
9th, 2012 at 03.00 PM and on April 17th monitored as per investment regulations
the requirement of minimum investment
■9
in the air
and guidelines - Violation of Note 3 to group plans for declaring separate NAV - Decision: The Insurer submitted that all
Regulation (5) of IRDA (investments) Violation of Para 10 of Annexure II of the the investment management activities /
regulations, 2000 and Para 1 to Part I of investment guidelines. core activities of investment
Schedule A of IRDA (Preparation of management (including fund accounting
Decision: In its submission the insurer
Financial statement) regulations, 2002. and NAV calculation) are being carried out
informed that as of Mar 2010, there were
in house by the MetLife India investment
Decision: Insurer submitted that since 17 ULIP funds out of which 15 were
team. Insurer sought time up to 30th
J&K Bank did not have the shareholding Individual Funds and 2 were Group
September, 2013 for hosting Investment
pattern prescribed in AS 18, it is not a Gratuity Funds (Balanced & Debt Fund).
Systems within India. On examining the
related party for the purpose of These two Group Funds have different FMC
submissions, the Authority takes a serious
disclosures. As regards disclosure of charges for different plans and there were
view on hosting Investment Systems /
investments made in promoter groups, 7 NAVs in Gratuity Balanced Fund and 5
Primary Data Center outside India which
the insurer submitted that the deposit NAVs in Gratuity Debt Fund totalling to 27
leaves enough scope for denial of access
amount with J&K Bank has been classified NAVs (15+7+5). Insurer also submitted
to IRDA as and when required, thereby
under “Promoter group”. Taking into that exposure norms are being complied
violating Regulation 7 (c) of IRDA
consideration the submissions made the at fund level. Taking into consideration the
(Registration of Indian Insurance
issue is not pressed. submissions made by the insurer charges
Companies) Regulations, 2000. It is also
are not pressed.
5. Charge 5: The insurer is not computing further reiterated that the insurer should
the daily NAV in respect of its ULIP funds in 7. Charge 7: Insurer was utilizing services keep all its data and all such (primary
the manner prescribed - Violation of Para of Deutsche Bank AMC for NAV Data) Centres inside the Country and
10.5 of “Guidelines on Unit Linked computation till 4th Nov, 2009 though should not be confined to investment
Insurance Products” dated December 21, assets under management have already data alone. It is also noted that IRDA had
2005. crossed Rs. 500 Crores - Violation of Point been insisting on this issue from 2004
no. 12 of Annexure II of Investment requiring the insurer to host all
Decision: In its submission the insurer
Guidelines. investment systems within India and I am
informed that the transaction costs to be convinced that the Insurer did not initiate
considered for daily calculation of NAV is Decision: In its submission the insurer
adequate measures in this direction and
insignificant compared to the total fund confirmed that NAV Calculation was not
now seeking time up to September, 2013.
size and may not make a difference to the outsourced and was being done in-house.
Ta k i n g i n t o c o n s i d e r a t i o n t h e
NAV. It further submitted that the actual It further clarifies that Deutsche Bank AMC
submissions, the Insurer is directed to
transaction costs are adjusted in the NAV was providing only Advisory Services for
host investment and accounting systems
computation on actual basis. The insurer Investments which were discontinued by
/ their respective primary data centers
also confirms that it is in compliance of Nov 2009. Considering the submissions of
within India before December, 2012.
NAV computation methodology defined the insurer no charges are pressed.
Insurer is also directed not to host any of
in the new guidelines its systems / data centers outside the
8. Charge 8: Insurer is using two
IRDA/F&I/CIR/INVO/173/08/2011 Dated country. Failure to comply with these
investment software i.e. ‘iCAMERA’ and
29th Jul, 2011. Taking into consideration directions within the stipulated time also
‘CRTS’ respectively for ‘accounting’ and
the submissions made, the issue is not attracts appropriate penal provisions.
‘trading’. The data base server where
pressed. However, the Insurer is advised to Treating the matter as a serious
‘iCAMERA’ is hosted is located in USA,
ensure compliance to IRDA Guidelines on infringement on policyholders’ interest
leading to outflow of investment
NAV Computation dated 29th July, 2011. and absence of prudent Governance on
transactions to the main server located in
6. Charge 6: As against maintaining 27 USA. In respect of ‘accounts software SUN Investment Management thereby
irda journal November 2012
different funds offered under various GL”, though one copy of complete backup violating Regulation 7 (c) of IRDA
ULIPs; insurer is maintaining only 17 of data base is maintained at insurer’s (Registration of Indian Insurance
funds as on 31-March-2010. There is no office at Bangalore, physical server is Companies) Regulations, 2000, the
segregation of investments amongst hosted in New York, USA with DR site at Authority imposes a penalty of Rs
these sub-groups of funds and net asset Beijing, China- Violation of Regulation 7(c) 5,00,000 (Rupees Five Lakhs Only) under
value of AUM of these funds and the of IRDA (Registration of Insurance Section 102 of the Insurance Act.
expenses are apportioned across the sub- Companies) Regulations, 2000.
■
10
i
-----------------------ii.ta
It is to further state that after December, submissions it is noticed that as at Decision: Insurer submitted that the
2012 if the Systems are not hosted in 31.03.2009 & 31.03.2010, the capital agreements entered are not for lead
India, the Life Insurer deems to be received from Met Life International generation but for collection of
continuously in violation and the against the rights issue was pending for documents and premiums. It also
Authority reserves the right to impose allotment because of non-subscription by submitted that remuneration paid to
penalty under Section 102 of the Act. the Indian promoters and possible breach these entities is for making available
of FDI cap. As this Inspection Observation infrastructure facilities. As against the
9. Charge: 9: Insurer has recognized the
is also referred in Charge 17 hereunder submissions of the insurer it is noticed
premium of Rs 1.14 Cr(of Group Insurance
which is appropriately examined the issue that some of the agreements are on lines
Business) as outstanding premium
is not pressed here. of referral agreements. However,
though the premiums are due for a period
considering the not so significant volumes
of more than 30 days - Violation of 11. Charge: 11: The payments made to
of remuneration involved, the charges are
Schedule-A , Part-1 , Regulation (2) of ‘Consultant – Wholesale Agency
not pressed. Insurer is advised to ensure
I R D A P re p a ra t i o n o f F i n a n c i a l Distributor’ during the year 2009-10 to
compliance to IRDA (Sharing of Database)
statements Regulations the extent of Rs.2.10 Cr were classified as
Regulations, 2010.
“Employee Remuneration and Benefits”
Decision: Insurer submitted that in case
under Schedule-3 (Operating Expenses) of 13. Charge: 13: As per Schedule-13
of additions of new members in the Group
the Insurer instead of “Business (current liabilities), an amount of Rs. 82.39
Business, premium has been recognized
Development Expenses / Consultants Fee”. Cr was shown as premium deposits as at
on due basis which is eventually received.
Similarly amounts (Rs 89.11 Cr) paid to 31.03.2010 and close to Rs. 63 Cr is lying
It also submitted that, premium
employees & various distribution unadjusted in Deposit Account, towards
outstanding for more than 30 days was
channels was shown as ‘Advertisement premiums. Majority of these are ULIPs and
taken due to time lag in data
and Publicity Expenses’. Further during hence unitization is delayed as the
reconciliation and this practice is
2009-10 claims investigations expenses policies are in lapsed condition - Violation
corrected Financial Year 2010-11
are wrongly classified to professional and of 10.6.1 of ULIP Guidelines.
onwards. On examining the submissions
legal charges without netting them off to
of the Insurer the matter is not pressed Decision: The insurer submitted that out
claims.
and the insurer is advised to ensure of total Deposit Account of 63 Crs, 30%
compliance to all the relevant Regulations Decision: The insurer submitted that it consists of New Business premiums at
referred herein. has corrected the classification of various stages of underwriting and the
accounts for FY 2010-11. Taking into balance being renewal premiums
10. Charge 10: The insurer could not allot
consideration the submissions that it has received in advance. Of the remaining,
the shares to MetLife International
rectified the classification of accounts Insurer submitted that deposits relate to
Holdings Inc., for Rs 74 Cr received because
charges are not pressed. However, the lapsed policies awaiting receipt of
of non-subscription by the Indian
Insurer is cautioned that it has to be pending requirements from the
promoters and possible breach of FDI cap.
vigilant while booking the accounts in customers for considering
The insurer has treated the “subscription
order to see that the Annual Reports are reinstatements. Insurer also submitted
money received towards rights issue” as
giving true picture of the prevailing state that it has taken measures such as
share capital and taken it for the purposes
of accounts and the Insurer is advised to sending out physical letters, SMSs and
of calculation of net worth and “Available
ensure compliance to IRDA (Preparation of Telecalling etc. which resulted in further
Solvency Margin” - Violation of Section
Financial statements) Regulations, 2002. reduction of the outstanding deposits.
6(a)(b)(iii) of Insurance Act, 1938.
Considering the submissions of the
12. Charge: 12: The Company has entered
Decision: The Company submitted that insurer charges are not pressed.
irda journal November 2012
■
11
in the air
than 3 quarters. Violation of Prudent Risk Insurer is cautioned to ensure compliance herein. The Chartered Accountant firm
Management practices. to IRDA (Assets Liabilities and Solvency chosen by the Life Insurer shall have a
Margin) Regulations, 2000. standing service of 10 years in conducting
Decision: Insurer submitted that owing to
audit of reputed firms of Financial Services
the ruling of Karnataka High Court (ITA No. 16. Charge 16: The defects in the Policy
and the particulars of the audit firm shall
2808 of 2005) there was delay in the Administration System resulted in wrong
be notified to the Authority soon after its
settlement of balances between company unitization of premium in respect of Unit
appointment, but within 30 days from the
and the reinsurer. It also submitted that a Linked Policies i.e. under or over
d a t e o f i s s u e o f t h i s o r d e r.
comprehensive review of the reinsurance statement of unit balances to customers.
Notwithstanding the requirement
data was undertaken and sent to The financial impact of less creation of
referred herein the serious gaps in the
respective reinsurers for their verification units in policy holders’ accounts is
defective policy admin system are
who had approved all the reinsurance estimated close to Rs 7 Crores. The insurer
considered as a serious violation
claims as at March 31, 2010. Insurer also also did not send the fund statements to
impacting the financial interests of policy
submitted that all the claims which had its ULIP policyholders. Internal controls
holders and under powers vested in the
become payable were settled in full by are not commensurate to the Business
provisions of Section 102 of the Act a
Metlife. Considering the submissions of Volumes - Violation of ULIP guidelines.
penalty of Rs 20,00,000 (Rupees Twenty
the Insurer it is to mention here that
Decision: The Company submitted that Lakhs Only) is imposed for this violation.
Reinsurance is an integral part of a
these errors were on account of defects in
prudent business model for a life insurer 17. Charge 17: It is noticed that the
the earlier Policy Admin Systems and that
and all transactions with the reinsurer insurer has failed to put in place the
it has changed to new system as of May,
shall be completed as per the agreed mechanism required for appropriate
2009. Regarding not forwarding fund
terms and conditions in order to see that valuation of Assets and arriving at
statements to policyholders the company
the claim obligations are met from the ‘Available Solvency Margin’
submitted that the statements were not
reinsurers’ side. In light of the
sent to ensure that no customers were 1) Wrong Classification of leasehold
confirmation from the insurer on the
allocated lesser units. It further submitted improvements
settlement of claims to the ultimate policy
that it has proactively taken steps to rectify
holder no charges are pressed. And the 2) Wrong valuation of Reinsurance
the issues arising from the defects in
Insurer is advised to put in place prudent Receivables
policy Admn system.
risk management practices with regard to
3) Service Tax advanced taken into
reinsurance. On examining the submissions it is
account for ASM
noticed that the company did not have in
15. Charge: 15: The asset liability cash
place effective policy servicing system as 4) Subscriptions received against rights
flows were not discussed in the ALCO
Insurer did not take timely measures to fix issue taken into account for ASM
meetings. On examining asset liability
the gaps though, the gaps were identified
cash flows, it is noticed that the In view of this the solvency ratio of the
in the internal audit observations during
mismatches are occurring in 9th year and company as at 31.03.2010, which is
the year 2008. The submissions of the
13th year in respect of Non-Linked Par reported by the Insurer as 1.65 is not
Insurer are not acceptable as there is a
Products and Non-Linked Non par correct - Violation of 64 VA of the
breach in the trust reposed by
products. - Violation of 2(9) of ALSM Insurance Act, 1938.
policyholders by overstating or / and
Regulations
understating the fund accounts of ULIPs. Decision: The Company submitted that as
Decision: The Insurer submitted that it is per regulation 2 of the IRDA (ALSM)
Hence, under powers vested in Section 14
monitoring the assets and liability cash Regulations all the movable furniture
(2) (h) of IRDA Act, 1999 the Life Insurer is
irda journal November 2012
flows on a quarterly basis, the ALM items have been classified under the head
hereby directed to cause an audit of entire
position is being constantly reviewed and ‘Furniture & Fittings’ and placed with
ULIP policies’ transaction effected by this
an update is provided to the Board “Zero” value and “Leasehold
defective Policy Administrative System
C o m m i t te e . O n co n s i d e r i n g t h e improvements” form part of the Buildings
and submit the Authority a certification
submissions it is noticed that the hence cannot be equated with movable
regarding the accuracy of the Fund
mismatch of cash flows are significant items like “Furniture and Fittings”. It
Account Statements of Policies soon after
coupled with poor position of free assets further submitted that Regulation 2 of the
the completion of the audit referred
which is a matter of concern. Hence,
■
12
i
-----------------------ii.ta
IRDA (ALSM) Regulations states that all noticed that an amount of Rs 184.87 variation in fund value as on date of death
assets other than categorically mentioned Crores received towards share capital intimation and date of registration of
in the regulation (furniture and fittings in subscription due for adjustment as at death claim in the systems. Hence true
this case) need to be valued at book value 31.03.2010 was considered for picture of unit fund on any particular date
and accordingly, it has consistently valued solvency purposes owing to which the is not considered - Violation of 10.6.2 of
leasehold improvements at book solvency calculation was considered ULIP Guidelines & Violation of IRDA
(depreciated) value. Regarding inconsistent with Section 64 VA of the (Protection of Policyholders Interests)
reinsurance receivables for more than 90 Act as indicated in the Charge. However, Regulations 2002 & Point no. 3 (b) of
days it submitted that there is a it is noticed that out of Rs 184.87 Crores Annexure – 1 of Corporate Governance
corresponding payable to reinsurers an amount of Rs 161.36 Crores was guidelines (Circular No.
which was considered in the solvency adjusted to share capital during 2010- IRDA/F&A/Cir/025/2009-10 dated 05
calculation and the disallowance has 11. Taking cognizance of Life Insurer August, 2009).
already been considered consistently. adjusting Rs 161.36 Crores towards
Decision: The Company confirms that the
Regarding Advance Service Tax paid on share capital, the Authority noticed
issue was identified in August 2010 itself
behalf of policyholders, Insurer submitted that the revised solvency ratio works
and that the actual eligible fund values
that as per the IRDA (ALSM) regulations out to 1.04.
were paid to the claimants though there
only advances of an unrealizable
The Authority is already seized with the were differences in the dates. As Insurer
character should be placed with value
matter and the solvency position of the submitted having taken remedial
zero. As per terms and conditions of Met
life insurer is being examined and dealt measures and ensured the settlement of
Growth policies, any tax (including Service
with separately. Hence, no charges are eligible fund value the charges are not
Tax) need to be borne by policyholders
pressed here. pressed. However, the Insurer is advised to
and service tax liability on charges
put in place effective operational
collected on the product “Met Growth” will 18. Charge 18: Outstanding provision for
procedures in order to protect the
be recovered from the policy holders on funding of future premium is not shown
interests of policyholders.
receipt of subsequent modal premiums in the financials in respect of death claim
by way of unit cancellations. Accordingly, under Met Magic plan. Unit balances 20. Charge 20: As per policy conditions in
Service Tax paid on behalf of the under these policies were being nullified case of death during grace period charges
policyholder has been shown as when claim is approved, though the plan other than policy allocation charges are
recoverable and considered for solvency has inbuilt premium waiver benefit - recoverable. However, while settling
purposes. Violation of Regulation 8 of IRDA death claim under ULIPs, if death occurs
(Protection of Policyholders Interests) within the grace period, Insurer is unduly
Regarding considering the Amount
Regulations, 2002. collecting ‘premium allocation charge’ –
received from MetLife International, the
There is an inconsistency in the policy
Insurer submitted that the amount Decision: The Company submitted that
wording vis-a-vis the File and Use
received as subscription money towards the system was rectified in November
which is in Violation of File & Use.
rights issue is against specific rights 2010 and all the claims have been
entitlement by the respective processed as per Terms and Conditions of Decision: The insurer submitted that
shareholders subscribed by them against the Policy. It also submitted that as the recovery of due premium in the grace
specific capital calls and as such is part of first maturity payout falls due only in period of the policy is in accordance with
the shareholders’ funds available for March, 2019, there is no impact on the the approved terms and conditions of the
solvency margin and has been rightfully interests of policyholders. Taking into File and Use. On examining the
considered for computation of solvency consideration the submissions of the submissions of the Insurer vis-a-vis the
being shareholders’ funds. In light of
irda journal November 2012
Insurer charges are not pressed and the File and Use it is observed that, the Insurer
these explanations, the Insurer contests Insurer is directed to strictly comply with is entitled to recover all the charges
that, solvency margin as on 31.3.10 may the provisions of Regulation 8 of IRDA relevant to the policy contract. However,
be considered at 1.65. (Protection of Policyholders Interests) the practice of Insurer recovering the
Regulations, 2002. overdue premium and adding the
On comprehensively examining the
investible amount to the fund value is an
solvency margin calculations 19. Charge 19: The Death claims are
operational practice which deserves to be
submitted by the Life Insurer, it is registered with delay, resulting into
revisited, as Insurer is only entitled to
■
13
in the air
recover the overdue charges, but not the submissions that the deviations on Free assignment cannot be treated in line with
entire premiums. Hence, Insurer is hereby Look were only on exceptional basis in the conditional assignment as defined under
directed to put in place operational interest of consumers, charges are not section 38 (7) of Insurance Act, 1938.
procedures in accordance to agreed terms pressed. However, Insurer is advised to Keeping in view the submissions of the
and conditions. Insurer is also directed to ensure compliance to Regulation 6 (2) of insurer that there were no grievances
maintain consistency in the terms and IRDA (protection of policyholders’ received, the charges are not pressed.
conditions of policy document with that of interests) Regulations, 2002. However the insurer is cautioned to
File and Use cleared by the Authority. ensure compliance to Section 38 of
22. Charge 22: The Insurer is in practice of
Insurance Act, 1938.
21. Charge 21: Free Look Cancellations crediting back the units redeemed on
entertained for reasons other than surrender / partial withdrawals after 24. Charge 24: Top up premium remitted
disagreement with the terms and execution of such requests, giving scope at various offices of the insurer is unitized
conditions of the policy contract. Further, for a possible market arbitrage - Violation at head office. Delay is observed in
in case of free look cancellations and of File and Use. unitizing the premium received and also
subsequent issue of new policies, insurer backdated NAV is used in case of top up
Decision: The Insurer submitted that as
is writing back the difference between the premium collected - Violation of point no.
part of customer retention and service
fund value under cancelled policy and 10.6.1 of ULIP guidelines dated
strategy it emphasizes the long term
premium amount under new policy to 21.12.2005.
benefits of insurance policy and due to
‘Met-life’ account and no deduction
this there were instances where Decision: Insurer submitted that Top-ups
towards stamp fee or mortality charges is
customers have chosen to take fresh are collected through various sources and
made. This is in violation of the
policies or have reconsidered their due care is taken to ensure compliance to
provisions of Regulation 6(2) of the
decision of surrender / partial withdrawal. ULIP guidelines, but in stray cases if there
IRDA (Protection of Policyholders’
On examining the submissions it is stated, is a delay due to internal reasons the
Interests) Regulations, 2002.
that, any effort of the insurer to retain the customer is compensated for the NAV loss.
Decision: Insurer submitted that keeping policy holders shall be before the On examining the submissions it is
in view the customer’s interest free look execution of a policy holder’s request, as noticed that the company admitted the
cancellations for reasons other than the the procedure of remitting back the gaps in the procedures in place for
disagreement with terms and conditions surrender / partial withdrawal amount servicing the ULIP policy holders. Though,
considered on an exceptional basis. As may let some policyholders take an undue the absolute number of cases (41 in 2007-
regards adjusting free look cancellation market arbitrage at the cost of continuing 08 to 732 in 2010-11) are on rise, the
funds internally insurer informs that to policy holders. However, keeping in view quantum of monetary compensation (Rs
r e t a i n t h e c u s t o m e r, c e r t a i n the submissions as also the number of 0.41 lacs in 2007-08 to Rs 4.56 lacs in
administrative charges are waived off as cases the matter is not pressed and the 2010-11) remitted is not significant. While
part of the customer grievance redressal Insurer is directed to ensure strict there is enough scope for arresting the
best practice and these exceptions are compliance to File and Use at all times. operational gap when noticed in 2007-08
duly approved by designated Managers in itself, the company sounds to be not
23. Charge 23: Insurer is registering
Customer’s interest. From the submissions paying enough attention to fix the gap
deferred assignments based on
of the insurer it is noticed that the number thereby leading to increased number of
declaration for deferred assignment
of free look cancellations for the reasons cases. It is also noted that the company is
effective from the deferred date -
other than disagreement with the terms in practice of making the monetary
Violation of Section 38 (2) of Insurance
and conditions though not significant, compensations from Policyholders’
Act, 1938.
entertaining such requests may only lead Account, which is considered as
irda journal November 2012
to possible market mis-conduct. As Decision: Insurer submitted that the unjustified. It is desired that any monetary
regards practice of allowing exemptions deferred assignment is nothing but a compensation to the individual
from the recovery of stipulated charges on conditional assignment permissible policyholders as a result of systemic
exercising the Free Look Options, it is to under Section 38 (7) of the Act and that no failures shall flow from Share Holders
mention that this practice may adversely complaints are received from the Account. Taking into consideration the
affect the interests of policyholders that customers. As against the submissions of submissions and the volumes of
are continuing the policies. Based on the insurer, it is to state that deferred instances, I caution the Insurer for not
■
14
i
-----------------------ii.ta
putting in place appropriate policy service intermediaries for business support are not allowed to solicit the business. It also
measures commensurate with the soliciting the business on behalf of the submitted that CBMs are paid
volumes of the business and charges are intermediaries basing on the lead / remunerations for their services, which
not pressed. Insurer is also directed to put referral provided by the corporate agents include agent activisation, training,
in place measures for timely allocation of and Brokers. The Advisor / Agent report is infrastructure support etc. It also states
units in respect of all ULIP policies by duly being given by the FPC and countersigned that in most instances, the CBMs have
complying with the applicable and by the Lead generator or Referral provider unknowingly signed on the documents
relevant ULIP guidelines. The Insurer is (who is not a licensed entity). Commission which were supposed to be signed by the
also directed to make any such monetary is paid to Intermediaries on policies not licensed insurance intermediaries. From
compensation hereafter from the sourced by them - Violation of 40 (2A) of the charges it is noted that the CBMs were
shareholders account, but not by debiting the Ins Act. engaging in solicitation & procuring
policy holders’ account. business, and also giving Moral Hazard
Decision: Insurer submitted that FPCs are
Reports which is not acceptable business
25. Charge 25: Statement of account appointed to provide technical support
practise. From the submissions of the
shows adjustments which were made for and training, mentoring and handholding
insurer it is also noticed that out of total
correcting over statement/ the Intermediary staff with no role to play
1430 CBMs there were 291 CBMs who are
understatement of units as observed in in the solicitation of the business and that
licensed insurance agents of other
the internal audit report. Due to these the Business solicited by Corporate Agents
insurers. Thus the Insurer did not put in
errors in unit statements, insurer has not and Brokers used to get captured through
place effective measures to carry out the
sent the annual unit statements to the FPC code mentioned on the
required due diligence while engaging
policyholders - Procedures in place are application forms. On examining the
the business partners. I consider the
not in the interest of policy holders and submissions it is noticed that the insurer is
charge as a serious violation of Section 40
non submission of unit statements also employing the FPCs for facilitating the
(2A) and 42 D (8) of the Act and IRDA
a violation of point no. 14.3 of ULIP insurance business of the intermediaries
Circular No. IRDA/CIR/010/2003 dated
guidelines dated 21.12.2005. by deploying at the offices of the
27/03/2003 accordingly in powers vested
intermediaries.Considering the
Decision: Insurer admits that there was a under section 102 of the Act a penalty of
submissions, no charges are pressed and
limitation in the earlier Policy Admin Rs 5,00,000 (Rupees Five Lakhs Only) is
the insurer is directed to comply with the
system which was identified in 2007 and imposed. Insurer is also cautioned to
provisions of Section 40 (2A) of the Act.
that it has corrected over 60,000 account ensure adherence to the statutory
statements and sent across the same to 27. Charge 27: Insurer engaged the provisions and circular referred herein.
customers. Insurer also submitted that services of Individuals and Corporates /
28. Charge 28: The Insurer has engaged
effective September 2010 the periodic firms on an “exclusive basis” as
the services of unlicensed individuals and
account statements are being sent for the “Consultants (CBM)”, to identify, recruit,
Corporates for soliciting and procuring
Unit Linked Policies. On examining the train, mentor and develop financial
insurance business. During 2009-10,
submissions of the insurer, it is noticed advisors (FAs). It is observed that the CBMs
Insurer engaged the services of around
that there are severe operational lapses are involved in the process of solicitation
3830 entities as Referrals, Lead Generators
under Unit Linked business. The and procuring the insurance business CBM
and Database share partners and paid Rs
non–issuance of Unit account statements is remunerated as a percentage of the
5 Crores as remuneration. It is observed
is not in conformity with point no. 14.3 of commission earned by the individual
that all these entities are involved in lead
the guidelines on unit linked products. A Agents resulting into overriding
generation. And Insurer continued such
similar procedural lapse is also noticed in commission. It is also noticed that the
relationships and obtaining leads /
Charge 16 above. The audit directed in the some of the CBMs are the licensed
referrals even after the issuance of IRDA
irda journal November 2012
said decision shall also cover the policy intermediaries of other life insurers -
(Sharing of Database for Distribution of
servicing deficiencies revealed here. In Violation of Section 40 (2A) and 42 D (8) of
Insurance Products), 2010 and IRDA
light of regulatory actions taken therein, the Act and IRDA Circular No.
( I n s u ra n c e A d v e r t i s e m e n t s a n d
no charges are pressed again here. IRDA/CIR/010/2003 dated 27/03/2003.
Disclosure) (Amendment) Regulations,
26. Charge 26: It is observed that Decision: The insurer submitted that the 2010. These are in Violation of Section 40
Financial Planning Consultants (FPC) who CBMs are engaged only to identify and (2A) and 42 D (8) of the Act, IRDA Circular
are full time employees allotted to groom the Financial Advisors and they are No. IRDA/CIR/010/2003 dated
■
15
in the air
■
16
i
-----------------------ii.ta
As regards payment of incentives to Group Guidelines. The Company further respect of all Members of all Group
Corporate Agents and Brokers, Insurer is confirms that it has complied with the Insurance Policies.
directed that no payments shall be made circular: IRDA/CAGTS/CIR/LCE
32. Charge 32: It is observed that Insurer
to any person who is not licensed to solicit /093/06/2010 dated June 07, 2010 during
is settling death benefit to the Group
the Insurance business. the annual inspection carried in 2011. In
Master Policyholder in non-employer-
light of the submissions, charges are not
As regards payment of incentives to employee cases in respect of ‘Group Term
pressed.
employees of referral partners, the Life Insurance Policies - Violation of Clause C-7
Insurer incurred Rs6,23,128 (2007-08), 31. Charge 31: Insurer is covering risk of Group Guidelines, 2005.
Rs53,23,481 (2008-09) and Rs42,33,496 without collecting required premium on
Decision: The insurer submitted that the
(2009-10) towards incentives to due date in respect of new additional lives
Group Policy Holder (GPH) happens to be
employees of M/s Axis Bank and Rs added during currency of the Group policy
the nominee in all the policies, as the
59,05,000 (2008-09) and Rs 19,15,300 - Violation of Section 64 VB of Insurance
Insurance coverage was given against the
(2009-10) to the employees of M/s Act, 1938.
loans sanctioned by GPH to their
Barclays, both referral partners.
Decision: Insurer submitted that Member members. It also submitted that the Claim
In addition to incentives, Rs 30,05,000 is Addition/Deletion for a group policy payments under such policies made to
paid to M/s Axis Bank, referral partner, happens throughout the policy year and the master policyholder were in line with
towards Communication Expenses, that indents are raised calling for the the F&U as approved by the authority for
Facilities Expenses and Advertisement and balance premium, for additions where the product Met Loan Assure. On
Publicity during 2009-10. Payments of sufficient premium balance is not examining the submissions it is noticed
these nature to the referral partners which available in the group suspense. It also that the practice of insurer issuing claim
are in addition to referral fee, is a violation submitted that there is complete control cheques in favour of Master Policy Holders
of IRDA Circular No. IRDA/CIR/010/2003 on non settlement of claims to these set of of various unorganised groups is not an
dated 27/03/2003. Hence, in powers new members in respect of whom acceptable practice. In the absence of non
vested under Section 102 of the Act, a premiums are to be received and which is settlement of claims in favour of the
penalty of Rs 5,00,000 (Rupees Five Lakhs) also notified to the Group Policy Holder. It beneficiary of the group insurance policy
is imposed and the Insurer is advised to also submitted that Group Insurance the financial interests of the dependents
abide by the statutory and regulatory Policies are adjustable policies under Rule of the deceased policyholders may be
provisions while engaging business 59 of Insurance Rules, 1939; specific jeopardised. In light of this I find that there
partners for the purpose of solicitation of relaxation is available from the is a violation of Clause C (7) of Group
insurance business. Insurer is also advised applicability of Section 64 VB of the Act. Insurance Guidelines and hence, under
to ensure compliance to IRDA (Sharing of powers vested under section 102 of the
From the submissions as also from the
database for distribution of the insurance Act, a penalty of Rs1,00,000 (Rupees one
charge, it is noticed that the insurer is
products) Regulations, 2010. lakh only) is imposed. The Insurer is also
extending the GI coverage and then
hereby directed to ensure compliance to
30. Charge 30: Insurer has sold the Group informing the MPH to remit the premium
Clause 7 of Group Insurance Guidelines
insurance through Corporate Agents. The which is in violation of Section 64 VB. The
dated 14th July, 2005.
insurer has not verified the corporate insurer’s submission that the Group
agents’ compliance to Group guidelines, polices are adjustable polices under Rule 33. Charge 33: The Insurer has neither
2005 during inspections on Corp Agents - 59 of Insurance Rules 1939 is not carried out any surprise inspection of the
V i o l a t i o n o f c i r c u l a r acceptable as Rule 59 does not apply to books and records of the Group organizer
IRDA/CAGTS/CIR/LCE/093/06/2010 dated Group Life Insurance and hence specific or manager at least once a year nor
June 07, 2010. relaxations to the provisions of Section 64 obtained a certificate of such compliance
irda journal November 2012
VB are not available. However, based on from the auditors of the Group organizer -
Decision: The Company has submitted
submissions that prudence is exercised Violation of Clause 11 of Group
that this was inadvertently missed out
while settling the claims the charges are Guidelines, 2005.
during the Corporate Agents’ inspection
not pressed and Insurer is advised to
done in September 2010 and reiterates Decision: Insurer submitted that it has
ensure receipt of premium before
that Employer – Employee business commenced the process of carrying out
commencement of risk in compliance to
procured is strictly in accordance with the the surprise inspection and obtaining
Section 64 VB of Insurance Act, 1938 in
■
17
in the air
auditors certificates from Group Policy As regards payment of administrative fee 36. Charge 36: The insurer has issued
Holders. In light of this the charges are not to Axis Sales, the submissions of the some policies under “Employee-
pressed. However insurer is advised to insurer that a service provider, Axis Sales, is Employer” scheme, even where the
ensure compliance to Clause 11 of Group engaged for administration of group percentage of holding of the employee
Guidelines, 2005 hereafter in respect of all insurance business is examined. It is also (insured) & his family members exceeded
its Group Insurance Business. noticed that Axis Sales which is the 5% of the share capital of the
subsidiary of Axis bank, was paid Rs company/firm. Violation of Life Council
34. Charge 34: Insurer has entered into
2,54,16,031 in respect of one scheme guidelines dated 12th October, 2007.
Referral agreement with Axis Bank for
covering 4585 lives on a total premium of
marketing and also entered into a service Decision: Insurer submitted that it has
Rs 18,06,02,020, which works out to
level agreement with Axis Sales for instituted process controls to implement
approximately 14%. On analytically
administration of the Group Product adherence to the recommendation made
examining, I observe that since Clause C –
covering the borrowers of the Bank and by the Life Council on the Employer -
4 prohibits reimbursement of
paid referral fee/ administration fee @ Employee Schemes. It also submitted that
administrative expenses to the Master
10% of the single premium received - where several employees are being
Policy Holder; the Insurer ingeniously
Violation of Clause B-2 of Group proposed for insurance while some of
entered into agreement with Axis Sales. I
Guidelines, 2005. them may hold higher than 5%
also observed that all the functions for
ownership the intent of the employer is to
Decision: Insurer submitted that it has which the said agreement was stated to
provide benefits to a group of eligible
paid referral fee to Axis Bank in terms of have been entered with Axis Sales are
employees, based on their individual role
referral agreement entered in terms of what a prudent insurer is supposed to
and contributions, hence considered
Referral Circular dated 14th February, discharge in house. In light of this, I am
insurance after due discussions with Chief
2003 issued by IRDA and that the referral constrained to warn the Insurer for not
Underwriter. It also submitted that
agreement is not exclusively for following Clause C (4) of Group Guidelines
issuance of such policies may be treated
marketing group insurance policies by spirit and direct the Insurer to be more
as non adherence to a non-mandatory
hence, Clause B (2) is not applicable. As prudent and maintain prudent business
governance guideline of Life Council, and
regards the Service Level Agreement with principles by adhering to regulatory
not a regulatory violation. On examining
Axis Sales it submitted that the agreement instructions by letter and also by spirit.
the submissions the charges are not
is an independent service agreement for
35. Charge 35: Insurer has engaged the pressed. However, the submissions of the
provision of services such as
services of several consultancies for insurer that Guidelines of Life Council are
administration, complaint handling,
valuation of Gratuity/ Superannuation / not binding is not acceptable, as the
provision of management etc. Hence, the
Leave encashment benefits which objective of bringing out such guidelines
compensation is in consideration of the
actually is the responsibility of the by Life Council is to bring in orderly
services. I consider the submissions of the
trustee/employer. The insurer is meeting discipline amongst all members of the
insurer as not acceptable since the Group
the cost of the valuation unduly. Violation council and to avoid a regulatory
Insurance Guidelines issued on 14-July-
of Section 41 of Insurance Act, 1938 intervention. As a member of the Life
2005 supersede the referral circular
Council, the Insurer is expected to follow
referred by the Insurer. Hence, there is no Decision: Insurer submitted that it cannot
the guidelines issued by the Life Council.
case to let the referral partner receive be construed as a rebate to any particular
referral fee on Group Insurance Business. policy and the services were provided to 37. Charge 37: It is prescribed in the IRDA
From the submissions it is noticed that both prospective and existing clients as circular dated 30.01.2006 that “where the
Met Life paid Rs 1,58,02,000 as referral fee part of the general services to facilitate premium on the life of a partner is paid by
during 2008-09 in respect of 2 schemes actuarial valuation. It also states that its another partner or by the partnership
irda journal November 2012
covering 7476 lives, which is considered Board has directed to compete on the firm, the scope of cover is not wider than
as a wrong payment and in violation of strength of ‘services’ and ‘education’ to term assurance”- the insurer has issued
Clause B (2) of the Group Insurance the customers in general including the few such policies. Violation of Cir
Guidelines. Hence, under powers vested customers who might choose other no.036/IRDA/Life/Jan-06 dated 30.01.06.
under Section 102 of the Act, I hereby insurers. Taking into consideration the
Decision: Insurer submitted that the
impose a penalty of Rs 5,00,000 (Rupees submissions, no charges are pressed.
policies referred in the charge were not
Five Lakhs Only) for this violation.
partnership policies but “Employer-
■
18
i
-----------------------ii.ta
Employee” policies where the proposed from Rural and Social Sector obligations if and as an exception; Cumulative cheques
held less than 1% ownership. Considering the Insurance Company commences are collected to promote the rural
the submissions of the insurer the charge operations in the Second half of the business. It also submitted that since
is not pressed further. Financial Year. As per the submissions, premiums are collected in advance there
considering 06th August, 2001 as the year is no violation of Section 64VB of the Act.
38. Charge 38: In some of the cases the
of commencement of operations, 2008- With regard to collecting letters from the
projected income and status profile of the
09 has to be reckoned as eighth year of policyholders, it submitted that since the
prospect is not matching and remittances
operations, hence the insurer has to fulfil distributing partner is acting as an agent
through multiple DDs, similar profiles
19% of total policies written direct as per of customer in order to make him aware
were observed - Violation of 3.2(ii)(a)(3)
Regulation 3B of IRDA ( Rural and Social and keeping in mind the interests of
AML Guidelines.
Sector Obligations) Regulations. customer the letters are obtained. Insurer
Decision: The insurer submitted that it also submitted that it will not encourage
From the submissions and the charges it is
has a well defined Board approved AML p re m i u m co l l e c t i o n i n c a s h b y
noticed that there is no management
policy with adequate operational controls intermediaries and specific provisions
focus as regards the rural and social sector
in place and all such cases are reviewed for were in place in respective agreements
obligations. On considering the
reporting as per the guidelines issued by while engaging intermediaries and that
submissions it is directed that the Insurer
t h e a u t h o r i t y. C o n s i d e r i n g t h e this practice of obtaining customer
shall put in place effective operational
submissions the charge is not pressed. declaration has been discontinued since
procedures to capture the accurate data in
December, 2010.
39. Charge 39: Wrong categorization of respect of Rural and Social Sector
policies with urban addresses as Rural. In Obligation. And the Insurer is also The submissions of the insurer that the
the case of the social sector obligations, it cautioned to ensure data accuracy while premiums were allowed to remit in
is observed that, there are number of complying with rural and social sector consolidated form owing to the difficulty
policies in which the occupation of Life obligations. cannot be considered as valid, as the
Assured / Policy Holder is not covered procedure lacks operational scrutiny to
From the revised data it is now noticed
under the definition of social sector. examine the veracity of the actual
that the Insurer has completed 18.53%
Violation of Regulation (c) (d) (e) (f) (h) remittance of premiums by the life
policies as rural policies as against a
of IRDA (Obligations of Rural & Social assured / policy holder. It may also leave a
targeted percentage of 19% in the
sector) Regulations, 2002. scope for potential premium funding by
financial year 2008-09 thus, marginally
the third parties. In light of this the Insurer
Decision: Insurer submitted that fell short of the mandatory norm by
is directed to ensure the remittance of
subsequent to IRDA inspection the rural 0.47% and the Insurer has violated the
premiums by respective policyholders /
/social sector data was reviewed and rural norms for the year 2008-09,
authorised representatives in accordance
reclassified to rectify the wrong accordingly a penalty of Rs 5,00,000
to the terms and conditions of the policy
classifications. Post reworking the rural (Rupees Five Lakhs Only) is imposed in
contract and charges are not pressed.
sector numbers reported for the year terms of Section 105 B of the Act.
2008-09 was dropped by 0.69% to As regards, delay in remittance of
40. Charge 40: Cumulative cheques are
18.64% from 19.33% originally reported. premiums at the offices of Insurers, on
collected from its business partners
The Insurer requests for considering the examining the submissions it is noticed
towards the premiums in case of rural
year 2008-09 as 07th year of operation for that the average Turn around Time for
policies. Letters are collected from the
reckoning rural and social sector remitting premiums at Insurer’s office
policyholders acquitting its responsibility
obligations taking in to consideration was around 5 – 7 days, which is
until premium reached the Insurer. It is
IRDA (Rural and Social Sector Obligations, considered quite significant and a
noticed that the average TAT for remitting
irda journal November 2012
■
19
in the air
there is no violation of Section 64VB of the point no. 12 of R2 form of IRDA Based on submission no charges are
Act, as gross misinterpretation of the (Registration of Indian Insurance Co) pressed.
provisions of Section 64 VB (4) in Regulations and Point no. 6 of Guidelines
Accordingly, in exercise of the powers
accordance to which the insurance agent, on Corporate Governance dated 05th
conferred upon me under the provisions
when collecting premiums on behalf of an August, 2009.
of the Insurance Act, 1938, I hereby direct
insurer shall remit the same within 24
Decision: Insurer has confirmed putting the insurer to remit the penalty of Rs
hours of the collection. There seems to be
in place business process management 76,00,000 (Rupees Seventy Six lacs only),
no remedial measures initiated by the Life
capability as early as in 2009 and further by debiting share holders’ account, within
Insurer to comply with these provisions,
explained that there is a Governance a period of 15 days from the date of
though the Insurer was aware of these
structure to report the exceptions in the receipt of this Order through a crossed
delays way back in the year 2007-08.
process. Considering the submissions the demand draft drawn in favour of
Hence under powers vested in Section 102
charges are not pressed. Insurance Regulatory and Development
of the Act, a penalty of Rs 5,00,000 (Rupees
Authority and payable at Hyderabad
Five Lakhs only) is imposed. Insurer is also 42. Charge: 42: The corporate guidelines
which may be sent to Mr. V Jayanth Kumar,
directed to ensure compliance to issued by the authority calls for a
Joint Director (Life) at the Insurance
provisions of Section 64 VB of the Act. company secretary to be nominated by
Regulatory and Development Authority,
the board to oversee the compliance of
Regarding collecting the letters from 3rd Floor, Parisrama Bhavan, Basheer
these norms on an ongoing process. The
policyholder acquitting the responsibility Bagh, Hyderabad 500 004.
insurer has not complied with this
of the Insurer till premiums reach office,
requirement - Violation of Guidelines on Insurer is also advised to confirm the
based on submissions that it has
Corporate Governance dated 05th compliance in respect of all directions
discontinued the practice no charges are
August, 2009. referred in this order within 15 days from
pressed.
the date of receipt of this order.
Decision: Insurer submitted that the
41. Charge: 41: Insurer has not put in
specific nomination of the Company (J Hari Narayan)
place necessary MIS through generation Chairman
Secretary by the Board has been made at
of various exception reports covering
the meeting held on 11th March 2011.
critical areas of operations - Violation of
Referral applications filed under IRDA • Insurers are not uploading referral “Withdrawn” by the Insurers.
(Sharing of Database) Regulations, 2010 agreement copies with the approved
• Insurers are required to resubmit the
entities in the portal even after the
Consequent upon notification of IRDA pending applications after submitting
Authority’s approval i.e., some are
(Sharing of Database) Regulations, 2010 their remarks/responses for the
pending for more than 21 months
all the Insurers have been filing queries/requirements raised by the
from the date of approval.
applications for approval of referral Authority within three (3) months
entities from the Authority. The Hence it is not possible for the Authority to f r o m t h e d a t e o f
know how many agreements are actually queries/requirements and
processing of applications is being done
effected. If the time frame exceeds a
through Referral Portal designed by the • Insurers are required to execute
certain period and falls in the next
Authority since November, 2010. referral agreements with the
irda journal November 2012
■
20
vantage point
‘There is a certain enigmatic quality about Health insurance business in that while on one hand
there is discernible growth, there are increasingly steep loss ratios on the other!’ exclaims
U. Jawaharlal.
I
f one were to take a global survey of necessities of life), the government can insurance business over the last few
the provision of basic health needs stay focused on the economically years in the Indian insurance domain
to the population, it could emerge under-privileged sections. It has been would tend to indicate such a progress.
that in various countries, it is the one of the most hotly debated topics in But the fact that an unbelievably high
government that provides some form the Indian domain, irrespective of percentage of the total medical
or the other of having in place a whoever is holding the seat of power. expenses of the country are still ‘out of
mechanism to cater to the basic needs One should admit that a lot of ground pocket’ says it all.
of its people. In several countries of the has been covered over the decades –
third world, however, this provision may especially in fighting such evils as small- Looking at it from the other side,
not be a very significant one – owing to pox, polio etc. However, if provision of although there have been higher levels
their large populations as also the good health to its subjects is the of business acquisition in the segment
priorities in the deployment of their avowed objective of the state, we are far progressively; insurers have been
means. In a country where from the mark unfortunately. indicating an inexplicable growth in the
fundamentally the health and hygiene claim ratios of the portfolio. Should it be
levels need a lot of improvement, it is all At a time when medical calamities are deemed to infer that this is indicative of
the more essential that the state should striking the society at a hitherto a high degree of adverse selection?
be the greatest provider of basic unknown regularity, and medical Partially yes; and further augmented by
services, but alas, there are constraints inflation always occurs at a rapid pace; it the high incidence of Health insurance
on the way! would make better sense for one to frauds that are taking the sheen out of
provide for some form of readiness to the business growth. Stakeholders
It has been reiterated time and again face the eventualities. Insurance that should quickly identify ways to tackle
that if the better resourced citizens fend serves well as a risk transfer tool should this malady before it assumes
for themselves somehow or the other be the first option for the average monstrous proportions.
(particularly in economies with a large citizen to ensure that his or her medical
chunk of the population not having the needs are well managed. The steady ‘Health insurance’ will be the focus of
means to see beyond the very basic increase in the levels of Health the next issue of the Journal.
irda journal November 2012
‘Health Insurance'
in the next issue...
■
21
issue focus
G V Rao insists that apart from the unique challenges associated with Marine insurance, several
basic principles in the designing of insurance contracts owe their origin to this class.
Majesty of Marine Insurance: hull and freight, as the main subject policies issued are accepted, as un-
matters of insurance. Marine insurance impeachable collaterals to the Letters of
A
t the international level, the laws of
(cargo) covers transit risks to property, Credit of the bankers. Insurers, therefore,
Marine insurance were derived
carried across seas, land and skies; in case can truly be proud of the role they have
from the decisions of the courts
of Hull insurance, it covers ships and been playing for centuries, at the global
and treatises of text writers, until 1906. It
designated liabilities in respect of a variety and domestic levels. It is also the oldest
was in 1906 that the laws and the legal
of related risks. Freight insurance is form of insurance transacted. The Lloyd’s
principles governing the Marine insurance
another cover. of London has been a unique example of
contracts were codified in the now famous
such an enterprise.
Marine Insurance Act 1906 in the U. K. In By transacting this complex Marine
India this Act has been copied wholesale insurance business, insurers have made While the Marine Insurance Act 1963
and enacted, as the Marine Insurance Act their biggest contribution to promote establishes a legal framework for
1963. The passage of this Act has become global trade and commerce, as the marine transacting Marine insurance business,
an insurance pinhead for judging the legal the carriage of goods transported, by
basis of almost all insurance contracts. The various carriage modes, such as air, truck,
principle of indemnity is at the core of the ships, railways etc. is further subjected to
Act, and so are the other fundamental various separate Acts governing the legal
principles relating to most insurance liabilities of each such carrier. For
contracts. preservation of recovery rights, an insured
The principle of is necessarily required to be familiar with
Internationally, the growing professional
trend has been to link Marine (Hull)
indemnity is at the all such legal provisions, which makes his
task frustrating. This task renders
business with business relating to core of the Act, and so
transaction of Marine insurance business
‘energy’, as highly specialized portfolios.
are the other more complex.
Both the segments are gaining increasing
sophistication. Just as in the case of Hull fundamental How have we fared?
irda journal November 2012
insurance, a number of floating units in principles relating to How has the Indian Marine insurance
the seas are insured under ‘Energy’
most insurance market fared since detariffication in 2007?
portfolio. The underwriting of both the
This write-up argues, based on a statistical
portfolios is now a highly complex contracts.
analysis of the data collected (from the
business.
Annual reports of the IRDA), that the
The Indian Marine Insurance Act 1963 Marine insurance business in India has
covers legalese for the insurance of cargo, been able to hold its own, keeping its
■
22
i
-----------------------irm
growth trends in parallel, along with the mainly the public players, who are fiercely
overall market growth trends, unlike the competing in the market, by offering
Fire and Engineering, which have been It is an arguable issue uneconomic rates, to win Marine
subjected to savage attacks on price front. that it is the fierce insurance contracts, where construction
of new plants are involved.
• Marine insurance business has been competition among
able to maintain its situational status, This mindset, of quoting uneconomic
the public players that
at about 6% of the gross premium in rates to procure business, at any cost,
10/11, a slight dip from 6.5% in 06/07. is setting the tone for must have logically crossed over to the
This is a formidable indicator of its unfair market rating mechanism adapted to other
growing importance to the national competition by almost stand-alone Marine contracts, as Marine
economy and trade. Marine business underwriting is entirely done at the DO
has been a non-tariff portfolio for
all players. levels. It is an arguable issue that it is the
long; and hence perhaps it did not fierce competition among the public
suffer a severe price attack. players that is setting the tone for unfair
market competition by almost all players.
• In 10/11 the market gross premium have achieved `227 cr growth over
Private players have a lot more to lose
for Cargo was `1,520 cr and for Hull the same period, from 06/07 to 10/11.
than the public players, whose solvency
`1000 cr together making up to
• The statistical analysis also reveals margins are under the protective custody
`2,520 cr. The public players’ share of
that Marine business portfolio has of the Govt. supplemented by inherited
it was 72%. The earned premiums for assets at low prices.
been, consistently, a loss making one,
the market amounted to `1,130 cr,
for players of both the sectors. The
about 48% of the gross, and the share Uneven spread of business?
claim ratio for the public players, on
of the public players was 75%. It is The statistical analysis provides unique
earned premium basis, has gone up
evident that the public players have insights of the growth states for marine
from 81% in 06/07 to 93% in 10/11;
been in the forefront of Marine insurance. The Marine premium for the
and for the private players, it has
insurance business. market in 10/11 was `2,520 cr. Marine
dropped from 112% in 06/07 to 82%
• Channel-wise procurement of Marine in 10/11. cargo premium was `1,520 cr and the Hull
insurance business showed that 47% was `1000 cr. Of this, the public players’
Private players are perhaps constrained in
of gross premiums came in ‘direct’, share was `1,800 cr and that of the private
their attempts to grow more Marine
with brokers at 26% and individual players `720 cr.
business, by the huge reinsurance
agents at 22%.
capacity required to write it, and their The leadership role truly belongs to
• Marine portfolio is not yet a meaty capital strength is relatively small. Out of Maharashtra. What comes as a surprise is
p o r t fo l i o t o p r i v a t e p l a y e r s . 15 private players, only 6 players write the fact that Maharashtra alone has
Transacting it needs technical Marine business in excess of `40 cr. each, contributed nearly `1,000 cr (40%) to the
expertise of the highest standard. The out of a total of Rs 717 cr in 10/11. Each of overall Marine premium of `2,520 cr. It has
private players - fifteen of them now, the public players writes more than `300 also contributed over 55% to India’s Hull
however, seem to be more wary of cr, in a total of `1,820 cr. Thus, one can insurance business at `550 cr out of
writing Marine business. Their overall even say that the competitive forces are `1,000 cr for India. Ranking next is Delhi
Marine portfolio share to total gross not all that severe in Marine insurance which chips in with `290 cr, followed by
irda journal November 2012
premium has dropped from 5.6% in business; and it is perhaps more restricted TN at `210 cr and Gujarat at `170 cr. These
06/07 to 4% in 10/11, while for the to competition among the public players.
four states, together, account for nearly
public players it has grown from 7% to
The above numbers lead one to the logical 70% of the Marine market in India.
7.2%.
conclusion that despite the selective but
These numbers show that the Marine
• The public players have improved intensive competition, by way of a fewer
premium growth developments in India
their premiums by `665 cr, in a three- numbers of players pursuing their
are unevenly spread, from a geographical
year span, while the private players premium growth in this portfolio, it is
■
23
issue focus
point of view. There is a lot more potential Recovery rights from carriers and insured. But then in no other portfolio,
to be exploited in the rest of the states. preservation of those rights by observing other than in Marine insurance, has legal
Insurers in general do not seem to have proper procedures is another problem. compliance so much of importance and is
yet any strategic business views on how to Lack of legal knowledge and expertise on obligatory. Marine Insurance Act 1963 is
leverage Marine business in them, despite the part of insurers’ employees in an Act wholly meant for its exclusive
the excellent past economic growth in interpreting policy terms and conditions, transaction. There is no other portfolio of
India. The influx of new players in the fairly and equitably, is another stumbling insurance that has been so
market has not made any difference to the block for the development of Marine comprehensively covered by legislation,
growth of Marine business. Perhaps it is insurance. including Motor portfolio, except for one
too complex to explain and to understand, segment -TP part. This makes Marine
Many insured prefer to leave insurance to
both for the insurer and the customer. insurance a unique branch of insurance.
their suppliers and their consignees,
Problems in Cargo insurance: particularly in imports and exports, as the What is inhibiting growth?
replacements will cover any foreign
One of the most intractable problems that When the internal knowledge and
exchange currency differences. The moral
public enterprises face in realizing Cargo expertise of insurers is rather limited, it is
hazard of insurers is given more publicity
claims is the compliance provision with too much to expect the distributors of
by word of mouth discouraging insurance
the 64 V B. Open policies issued with pre- Marine insurance products to be seen as
buying from local insurers. For rail transits,
determined sum insured and requisite more familiar. Today, Marine insurance is
rail risk or owner risk, is of importance.
premium thereon is neither monitored by sold, more because of customer demand
Insurers prefer that an insured must
the insurer nor the insured. Insurers have for it rather than as an insurance product,
insure goods subject to rail risk, so that
not found any mechanism to solve this in an insurer’s armoury to be pushed for
they act as recovery agents, after paying
issue. The insurance ‘rules’ made by the sales. Since various types of cargo are
the claim. Owner’s risk may entail a
GOI giving numerous relaxations for covered, with various type of packing,
rejection of claim, unless it has been
imports and exports, under the 64 V B, insurers need to possess minute
disclosed earlier.
seem to have been all but forgotten. These knowledge of their inherent properties.
need to be revisited to protect the A good deal of Marine claim processing is Each mode of transit has additional
customers’ interests. riddled with numerous legal compliance enactments to comply, besides the Marine
requirements to get a Marine claim paid, Insurance Act.
Drafting of the policy wording in
which frustrates an uncomplicated
describing the nature of property insured, When interpreting insurance contracts in
how these are packed and in how many general for dispute resolution, recourse is
packages the consignment contains often taken to interpreting the
causes avoidable disputes on the nature fundamental principles of insurance, as
When interpreting
of packing at the time of claim processing. defined in the Marine Insurance Act. Its
It is in the interests of insurers to be as insurance contracts in majesty and simplicity continues to
specific as possible in describing the general for dispute surprise and cause awe among most
property insured. resolution, recourse is professionals of insurance, yours truly
included. The Indian market has a long
The second issue relates to the amount of often taken to
way to go to exploit this branch of
insurance specified in annual contracts, interpreting the insurance.
which may get exhausted, with either of
the parties not monitoring the depletion.
fundamental Any introduction to any branch of
irda journal November 2012
These procedural issues create problems, principles of insurance must necessarily start with the
which both want to avoid; who should insurance, as defined ABC of Marine insurance.
take the lead? Since multiple transits may
in the Marine
be involved, insurers tend to put time
durations at each transit point, which Insurance Act. The author is ex-CMD of Oriental
insured usually do not observe. Insurance Company Limited.
■
24
i
-----------------------ii.ta
Offshore Drilling Rigs
- On Par with Ships?
Shubhro S. Chakrabarti ponders over the issue whether offshore drilling rigs can be termed as ships;
and if so, to what extent they come under the provisions of the various regulations pertaining to
maritime trade.
A
very obvious question which to be mobile because , after finishing place to another. In either case, it differs
seems to vex all those who are drilling one exploratory well , a crew has to from ordinary cargo ship in that it has a
somehow or the other connected move it to another site to drill another and hole amid ships through which the
to Marine industry and offshore E & P which is why these are loosely called as drilling activity is carried out. The ship is
activities, including the men who practice ‘portable hole factory’. The operators use kept in position by a number of powerful
Maritime Law is, is a drilling rig a ship? two basic types of MODUs to drill most anchors or by installing ‘thrusters’ in the
The same question also makes exploratory and developmental wells, front and at the back (fore & aft) and on
insurers/reinsurers to ponder over too namely, Bottom- supported units and both sides of the vessel. A computerized
because Running down clause in the Hull Floating units. system automatically activates the
& Machinery policy means that their ‘thrusters’ to maintain the ship precisely
In the exploratory stage, especially a case
marine department may have to pay on location. It is popularly known as
of deep-water drilling, say 100 miles away
claims for damage done to rigs as ‘ ships’. ‘Dynamically Stationed’. Enormous
from the shore line, operator selects a
strength is necessary because drill-ship
If one looks at the Merchant Shipping Act d r i l l - s h i p , w h i c h i s g e n e ra l l y a
has to remain on station for several
of 1894 (UK Act), it defines ship as a vessel transformed oil-tanker or a bulk-carrier
months before oil is reached.
built for navigation not propelled by oars. with a navigating crew commanded by a
M. S. Act of 1995 defines a ship that certified master. She can move above the Drill-ships cannot operate everywhere,
includes every description of vessels used seas under its own power like any other especially because of weather conditions,
for navigation. Similarly, Indian M.S. Act of merchant ship or it might not be self- adverse marine condition in general or
1958 as amended in 2003 defines a propelled and have to be towed from one depth of the water. The operators then
‘vessel’ which includes a ship, boat, sailing have to select either a semi-submersible
vessels or other description of vessel used or a jack-up.
in navigation. One can argue that a rig
A semi-submersible consists of a deck
One can argue that a rig built on land to be built on land to be with drilling apparatus and living and
towed hundred miles out to the sea has towed hundred miles working quarters for the crew built on it.
been built for navigation. But is it a vessel? The deck, which must be above the
out to the sea has been
To the underwriters the answer is that highest waves likely to be encountered, is
some rigs are ships and some are not. built for navigation. But mounted on the tubular legs which are
Now let us analyze this in a little detail. is it a vessel? To the fixed to buoyancy chambers 50 to 80 feet
irda journal November 2012
Once an oil company has obtained a full underwriters the below the surface of the water. These
right to drill a ‘wild cat’ (exploratory well) have hulls up to almost 300 feet long. The
they must then select some type of drilling
answer is that some maximum depth at which they can work
rig and in most of the cases they elect to rigs are ships and some is governed by the weight of their anchor
use a MODU (Mobile Offshore Drilling Unit). are not. chains. Some semi subs are dumb and as
Rig owners can move MODUs from one such to be towed to the location, others
drill site on the water to another. A rig has are fully mobile being self- propelled.
■
25
issue focus
Jack ups are generally bottom supported thieves, captures, seizures, restraints and
units. It has legs that rest on the sea-bed. detainments of princes and peoples,
The rig is towed to its operating site; and ‘Dynamically jettisons, barratry; and any other perils
the legs, which until then have been in the stationed’ means that which are either of the kind or may be
air, are lowered to the sea bottom. the vessel is kept in designated by the policy’. If one analyzes
Thereafter the deck can be jacked up to a the position now, one would find the
position by computer
height where it will not be affected by definition would seem marine adventure
100-foot waves. controlled propelling to embrace ‘navigation of the sea’.
equipment which
Needless to mention that bottom A fixed offshore structure is not exposed to
supported units cannot be utilized in automatically perils of ‘navigation of the sea’ except in
exceptionally deep-water; for example counteracts the wind, an indirect way, in the sense that it is
over 2000 ft., as it is impossible to use legs currents and tides. vulnerable to collisions from other
long enough to reach the sea bed. As navigating vessels. But it is exposed to
already indicated, in such circumstances a other ‘perils of the sea’. However, during
dynamically stationed vessel may have to ocean transits, fixed structures are
be used. Generally, most of the drill-ships prefabricated in the sheltered water, exposed to navigational perils. Hence, a
and semi subs nowadays have such towed on tanks to the site and then case can be made that during some
facility. ‘Dynamically stationed’ means ballasted and sunk into place. The stages of offshore construction the Act
that the vessel is kept in position by advantage of concrete gravity platform is might be applicable but not to the extent
co m p u t e r co n t ro l l e d p ro p e l l i n g that the installation time is much less and after the structure is pinned down to sea
e q u i p m e n t w h i c h a u to m a t i c a l l y the tanks used to float it out remain as bed.
counteracts the wind, currents and tides. store for oil that it produces. Based on
what so far has been deliberated, we have As far as MODUs are concerned one can
Floating rigs move in accordance with the to admit the following facts: forcefully say that these will qualify,
motion of the sea, but the well itself is part especially where such units are self-
of sea bed. The pipe from the well head to - Some rigs are ships all the time propelled and those of a ship-shaped
the rig, therefore, has to be flexible.’ - Others may be ships while moving but design which can be described as ‘vessels’,
Motion compensators’ are generally used artificial islands while working built for a specific purpose. A similar
to keep the pipe upright and prevent - Some must be regarded as artificial argument could be put forward in case
buckling and to keep weight on the drill island all the time. FPSO s (Floating production, storage and
bit steady. offtake vessels). Again, SPMs (single point
A very common question in the offshore mooring) will generate some controversy.
When oil in sufficient quantity found, the Oil & Gas Insurance fraternity is whether
operator generally go for using a Marine Insurance Act 1906 (of UK) is We look forward to seeing a court decision
production rig, which need not be mobile applicable to the policies effected on in the matter in future.
because it will remain in position until the offshore energy units subject to English
References:
reservoir is exhausted. So decision is law, practice and jurisdiction. To the
invariably taken to construct a platform, knowledge of the writer, based on - Publications of Petroleum Extension
either made of steel or concrete, which whatever information could be gathered, Service, The University of Texas at
will support the supply pipes from the this has never been tested at law and Austin, Austin, Texas.
wells and also carry plant for separating there is no definitive answer.
- Offshore Oil & Gas Insurance by Mr.
oil, gas and water from the liquid that
The MIA applies to losses incidental to David W. Sharp.
comes up.
irda journal November 2012
■
26
i
-----------------------irm
Dealing with Piracy
- A Perennial Bottleneck
While expressing hope that the new Presidential regime in Somalia would bring about a positive
change in the troubled waters, Prashansa Daga cautions against undue optimism in the world of
sea piracy.
“I need know no navigation: war, trade and piracy. The kidnap and ransom insurance assessments and assist ship owners to
piracy – an inseparable trinity.” market has created specialist marine K&R improve their preparedness against
products intended to provide certainty of piracy threat. These additional services
Mephistopheles in Goethe’s “Faust”
cover. These policies are designed to include providing the owners and the
P
iracy, as old as the history of reimburse ransom payments up to a pre- masters of the ship with real time
seafaring itself, is still a serious risk agreed limit. Such products are treated in information on evident threats and
both for shipping and for ocean deep confidence. K&R insurers have suspicious activity enroute. Such insights
marine insurers today. In Greek times, established close working partnerships have resulted in re-routing decisions for
piracy was considered a profession like with professional response consultants many ships, who could have otherwise
hunting and fishing. Nowadays, it poses and in some cases have retained their met a different fate.
greater risk and cost to trade, seafarers, services exclusively. These response
Somalia Piracy, future ahead…
the shipping industry, and increasingly, consultants have considerable experience
the insurers. negotiating with pirates for successful Some observers believe that Somali piracy
resolution of hijacking. costs for 2011 could have been higher but
Somali piracy in 2011 is estimated to have
for a number of factors. These include an
cost between $6.6 and $6.9 billion. The Other consultancy organizations -
extended period of monsoonal rough
shipping industry bore around 80%, or separate from the response consultants -
weather off Somalia’s coast and the use of
$5.3 billion of these costs. p r o v i d e p r e - v o y a g e p i ra c y r i s k
deterrent mechanisms such as private
Somali pirates have a clearly defined armed security. Other activities
business model: they violently seize ships, throughout the year included an altered
sail them to the Somali coast and then re-routing model where ships transited
Somali pirates have a close to the western Indian coastline,
hold the crew and cargo for months while
insurance companies negotiate over the clearly defined rather than around the Cape of Good
release. The amount of the settlement business model: they Hope; and pirates’ changing use of
ransom differs, but it is a lucrative mother ships from large vessels to smaller
violently seize ships,
business: over the past few years, pirates fishing boats. Further, 2011 saw a more
have been paid an average of $4.5 million
sail them to the aggressive response from military forces
per ship, or in total $160 million for all Somali coast and then conducting counter-piracy missions in the
irda journal November 2012
ships. Proximity to the Gulf of Aden's busy hold the crew and region.
shipping lanes and poverty has in recent
cargo for months All these actions have come at a cost;
years tempted many young men to take
while insurance preventive measures alone have
up piracy.
contributed to a total cost of some $3bn
companies negotiate
The insurance industry has responded by in 2011, which includes insurance
developing customized solutions to over the release. premium paid of $635 million.
assist the shipping industry deal with
■
27
issue focus
These measures have yielded favorable exercises to contain the piracy threat. Off
results in 2012. Attacks in the first eight Nigeria’s 530 miles of coast, crossed by
months of the year fell by almost 75%. Ship-owners are now dozens of oil tankers every day, attacks so
The number of incidents involving Somali able to negotiate far this year have already nearly doubled
pirates was just 69 in the first half of 2012, discounts of up to 50 to 21 from 11 during all of last year. Some
compared with 163 in the same period 41% of the world’s trade, worth $3.2
per cent on their
last year, according to the International trillion a year, “touches Africa in some
Maritime Bureau (IMB). premiums in way,” according to an internal U.S. Navy
recognition of the policy document. That includes more than
The number of vessels and hostages
reduced risk of being half the oil loaded onto ships the world
held by pirates: According the IMB the
over. Some 60% of pirate attacks are never
number of vessels and hostages held as at hijacked. reported according to London security
31 August were 11 and 188, respectively.
firm AKE Ltd., making a detailed
NATO’s Shipping Centre reports 7
Many countries, including India continue assessment of the scale of the problem
merchant vessels and 177 crew held
to face the challenge of piracy, given their difficult as victims are fearful of retaliation.
hostage, while the UKMTO believes there
are 13 vessels (including dhows & FVs), proximity to the Indian Ocean. In Some commentators view piracy as a
and 205 people held hostage. response, India is readying an initial 100- symptom of the lack of maritime order in
man team to protect its merchant vessels the region. For them endemic drug
In September 2012, an important event in the area. This is the first time armed smuggling, human and weapons
took place in Somalia that has further personnel will be deployed aboard cargo trafficking and attacks against oil
lifted the hopes of maritime industry and ships. This represents a change in policies infrastructure have threatened to turn
trade --- the election of Somalia's new of the Indian government, from not West Africa’s seaways into a criminal
President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud . The allowing arms on board Indian ships, to super-highway. However, very distinct
President has called for an end to having government-sponsored armed geopolitical conditions prevent the Somali
terrorism and piracy in a nation that has personnel on board. business model from being easily
been mired in conflict for more than two
The reduction in pirate attacks off the transported to West Africa. How the
decades.
Somali coast is driving down the cost of insurance sector responds to these
The development of a stable and piracy insurance for commercial ships. It is developments on the West African
democratic government in Somalia is also weighing on the market for marine subcontinent, where the tactics are
likely to have a significant impact in kidnap and ransom insurance as well, different and thus the challenges and risks
reducing the levels of piracy in the high which is estimated to have grown from would be very different, will be fascinating
risk area (HRA) over the longer term. In the virtually nothing to about $635 million in to see!!!
short term, however, it is very unlikely that a little more than five years. Ship-owners Reference Sources:
the new Government of Somalia will be are now able to negotiate discounts of up
able to effectively address the conditions to 50 per cent on their premiums in www.oceansbeyondpiracy.org
within Somalia that allow piracy to recognition of the reduced risk of being www.oceanuslive.org
flourish. The threat of piracy therefore hijacked.
continues to remain in the foreseeable Piracy: The insurance implications
future. In recent times, West Africa and (Internal Marsh paper)
specifically the Gulf of Guinea has
Experts reckon that the pirates still possess suddenly come alive as an area of piracy www.Bbc.co.uk
the intent and capability to operate in the activity. The region reported 45 incidents
irda journal November 2012
www. Swissre.com
HRA. With the end of the SW monsoon, of piracy to the International Maritime
weather conditions in the area will Organization in 2010, rising to 64 in 2011 AEGIS Maritime Intelligence Reports
improve significantly, resulting in a likely and this will likely be surpassed in 2012. September 2012
increase in pirate activity. Security experts
continue to recommend that vessels Pirates are expanding into Togo and Benin ,..
faster than Nigeria’s navy can commission The author is Head, The Casualty &
transiting the HRA implement anti-piracy
new gunboats and ramp up cross-border Crisis Practice at Marsh India.
measures.
■
28
i
-----------------------ii.ta
Getting the Basics Right
- How Different is Marine Insurance!
N. M. Behera observes that Marine insurance is altogether a different ball game when compared to
the other classes; and needs a lot of domain knowledge to understand its intricacies.
M
arine Insurance is an agreement contracts which are based on the legal But this principle is mostly impracticable
whereby the insurer undertakes principles of uberrimae fides (utmost in Marine insurance especially in ocean
to indemnify the assured, in the good faith or UGF). The contract can be voyage. It happens so when the risk is
manner and to the extent agreed, against avoided by any party if UGF is not thousands miles away, changes its
losses incidental to marine adventure. observed by the other party. Section 19, ownership during maritime, and the
There is a marine adventure when any 20, 21 and 22 of the Marine Insurance Act, insured knows no much of the details. It is
insurable property is exposed to maritime 1963 explains the provisions. In all also not practicable by any party to
perils i.e. perils consequent to navigation insurance contracts, although the duty of arrange for the survey. Under such
of the sea. The term 'perils of the sea' the UGF applies also to the insurers, this circumstances, in addition to whatever
refers only to accidents or causalities of rests highly on the insured because the knowledge the insured has, the broker (in
the sea, and does not include the ordinary insured only knows the relevant material addition to the insured’s disclosure) tries
action of the winds and waves. Besides, facts on the risk more than anybody else to gather more information from various
maritime perils include, fire, war perils, including insurers. other sources so that important material
pirates, seizures and jettison, etc. In India, i n fo r m a t i o n i s p ro v i d e d to t h e
Marine insurance is regulated by the underwriter to take a decision for
Indian Marine Insurance Act, 1963. acceptance of the risk. Many times, a
Many times, a person person can purchase a policy on the
All insurance contracts, in the insurance subject matter in which it is not known
world operate under the basic principles can purchase a policy whether the matter is lost or not lost and
of the insured is ignorant of the conditions of
on the subject matter
the subject matter. Therefore, it is seen
i. Utmost good faith, in which it is not that the principle is not in strict
ii. Principle of indemnity,
compliance as it is followed in other
iii. Insurable interest known whether the
iv. Proximate cause insurance contracts. However, the contract
matter is lost or not can be voided ab initio if the element of
However, Marine insurance, although ‘fraud’ exists.
lost and the insured is
follow the basic principles, is different in
irda journal November 2012
many ways not only in principles but also ignorant of the Principle of indemnity:
in other aspects.
conditions of the The contract of insurance is based on
Utmost Good Faith: principles of indemnity. The insured is not
subject matter. allowed to make a profit out of insurance.
The doctrine of caveat emptor (Let the In most of the insurance contracts, the
buyer beware) applies to commercial compensation is limited to actual loss
■
29
issue focus
suffered or the amount of sum insured, and even at the time of loss. But the insurance is unlike others because the
whichever is lesser. But Marine insurance principle has hardly any meaning in ownership of the subject matter changes
fails to adhere to strict indemnity due to Marine insurance because the cargo in hands and is freely assignable. The
large and varied nature of marine voyage. transit keeps on changing its ownership insurable interest is more verifiable at the
Under Marine insurance, the indemnity from hand to hand due to on-sea sales time of loss in Marine insurance and it
principle is followed in the manner and to and purchases. The initial purchaser does not matter if the person has no
the extent agreed. Marine policies are might have taken the insurance, but sold insurable interest any time before that. In
construed to be Agreed Value policies, i.e. the cargo while the cargo is in mid sea and Marine, it is not necessary that the
when the basis of valuation of the might have ceased to be the owner of the insurable interest of the person should
consignment is agreed in advance and cargo in transit. But the insurance remains have to be there at all times from
incorporated in the policy; settlement of in his name although he is not the real inception of the policy till the expiry date.
claim is made accordingly. In other words, owner. On the other hand, the purchaser
even incidentals and profit to a becomes the real owner but does not In a nutshell, insurable interest is required
reasonable extent can be included in the have the insurance in his name. Still, if throughout the period of contract in
Marine cover. Claim for a portion as profit, there is a loss during which the purchaser respect of all classes of insurance except
which is part of the sum insured is also is the owner, he can claim the loss and Marine insurance. In Marine insurance the
considered for payment. However, there transfer of insurance is not necessary. existence of insurable interest is necessary
are certain elements like customs duty Under such situations, it is not essential for only at the time of a claim. The reason for
which are strictly indemnity based. The the person to have an insurable interest at the relaxation in Marine insurance is
principle of indemnity is against making a the time of effecting the insurance, based on practical necessities. When
profit and therefore is another deviation though he should have an expectation of goods or properties are sold, the insurable
in Marine insurance. acquiring such an interest. If he fails to interest stands altered automatically in
acquire insurable interest in due course, Marine. But it is not automatic in respect of
It is customary in the other branches of he does not become entitled to the insurance contract governing such
insurance to maintain the indemnity both indemnification. goods or properties in other insurance
at the time of proposal, during the policy contracts.
period as well as at the time of claim. Most In other insurance say in Motor, if X sells
of the other policies are settled on the the car to Y, it is necessary that the Generally, insurance contracts are
basis of market value irrespective of the insurance has to be transferred to Y’s personal contracts and hence, unless the
insured value. But in Marine, the principle name (Own Damage). Otherwise, Y is not transfer of interest is advised to the
is based on the insured value than on the entitled for any insurance claim. Marine insurer and is incorporated in the policy by
insurable value. Most Marine policies are way of a specific endorsement from the
agreed value policies, except in customs insurer, the policy becomes void from the
duty element. date of such transfer of interest. But
Marine insurance policies can be freely
Section 3 of the Act deals with this The initial purchaser assigned. They can be assigned either
provision, which provides that a contract before or after loss.
of Marine insurance is an agreement
might have taken the
Proximate Cause:
whereby the insurer undertakes to insurance, but sold the
indemnify the assured in the manner and
cargo while the cargo The cause proximate to a loss is the cause
to the extent agreed upon that is insured
of the loss, not necessarily in time, but in
irda journal November 2012
■
30
i
-------------------ii.ta
Marine insurance is also significantly Stamp Duty:
different from other insurance in the
following ways. There is no proposal Although stamp duty expenses may not
form any significant distinction, in India,
Different Laws: form for Marine the insurers bear the stamp duty in all
insurance and even if contracts except in Marine insurance. The
Since the subject matter in Marine insured bears the stamp cost in Marine
insurance is covered from the inception of it is there in some
insurance.
its maritime voyage till it reaches the final form or the other, it is
destination, the risk floats and passes Claim and Loss assessment:
through various countries, and attracts
neither common nor
the law of the land where it is positioned standard as is found in In India, normally the insured is entitled to
at any particular time and not necessarily appoint a surveyor of his own for
all other insurances. assessment of the loss and submit the
the law of the land where the policy was
purchased. same to insurers for claim settlement. The
survey fees paid by the insured is
Insurance Clauses: reimbursable if the original claim is
payable. It is different in other classes of
The clauses of Overseas Marine insurance business like Fire, Motor and other
these, the amount payable in the event of
are international in nature which comes property insurance covers, where the
a total loss is the current market value and
under Institute Cargo Clauses (ICC clauses); insured is required to approach the
not the agreed sum insured. ‘Agreed
whereas most of the other insurance insurance company and expect the
value’ insurance means that, if there is a
contracts are designed keeping in mind insurers to appoint a surveyor. In such
total loss, the sum insured is the amount
the national boundary. situations unlike in Marine, the survey fees
that will be paid irrespective of the actual
value at the time of loss. Of course there is payable irrespective of whether the
Abandonment:
are certain exceptions in the components claim is payable or not.
This applies only in Marine insurance of SI like Customs Duty. The peculiarity is
where in the event of a constructive total that the SI also includes some amount of
loss, the insured is entitled to abandon all profit which is legal.
rights in the subject matter to the insurer
and claim for a total loss. A constructive Use of Proposal Form:
total loss is where insured is deprived of
For each and every insurance contract, the
the possession of his ship or goods by a
insurers need the insured to fill up the
peril insured against, and (a) it is unlikely
standard proposal form, which becomes
that he can recover the ship or goods as
the basis of insurance policy. Any
the case may be or (b) the cost of
misrepresentation, suppression of facts in
recovering the ship or goods, as the case
the proposal form may make the contract
may be, would exceed their value when
void ab initio. But the proposal form which
recovered. This envisages a situation
is very common in all insurance contracts
where the property is not completely
is unknown in the Marine insurance. Most
destroyed. But it is as good as lost as far as
policies under Marine insurance are
irda journal November 2012
31
Thinking Cap
Dr. N. Sivakumar opines that although the insurance sector provides extraordinary business
opportunities in India, the sector faces several challenges towards further growth.
■
32
FIGURE 1 'customer relationship' have been
-i
!l!!ll!!m!l
l. INNOVATION
BASED GROWTH
,CHALL ENG·ES
.J surrenders and lapses (Chakravarthi,
2008). Further, in a detariffed
scenario, premium rates are being set
very unscientifically with very little
attempt to fine tune the risk attached
to different categories of businesses.
INNOVATION • Other issues: Many insurers face the
BASED GROWTH problem of poor retention of tied up
DRIVERS
agents. Most insurers do not have
robust and effective fraud risk
management process (Ernst & Young,
INNOVATION
,BAS D.KEV 10 2011). The insurance sector has a long
GROWTH ACTION way to go on third generation reforms
Pl.ANS in areas like risk based Solvency II
norms.
I - SWOT analysis of the Indian urban centres, the private insurers c) Opportunities of the insurance
insurance sector: The first issue among have made their presence felt sector:
innovation challenges deals with SWOT
• The entire sector has a strong pool of • Detariffing of the insurance sector has
analysis. With regard to the Indian
skilled professionals. created an opportunity in rewarding
insurance sector, these include:
• The sector has already introduced a good customers and penalising loss-
a) Strengths of the insurance sector: making customers.
basket of several products to cater to
There are several strengths of the
the needs of different customer • The sector has an opportunity to
insurance industry:
segments. experiment with new distribution
• A strong distribution network has channels like postal services soon.
• Finally, the growth rate of the sector is
been developed by UC, public sector
quite respectable at the present. • Companies can target Tier 2 and Tier 3
general insurers and several private
players. For example, UC has a b) Weaknesses of insurance sector: cities through innovative products to
powerful network of 2048 branches While the sector has several strengths, improve market share.
and 807 satellite offices. there are weaknesses too. These • Very importantly, it is now possible for
include: the sector to conduct research in the
• According to the Chairman of IRDA.
several insurance companies have • Customer related: Awareness of area of changing mortality and
also put in place robust grievance insurance products among customers morbidity ofindian population due to
irda journal November 2012
redressal mechanisms (Baru, 2010). is very low. This has affected insurance medical advancements, to facilitate
penetration with only 27% of more appropriate pricing of insurance
• Private players have strong foreign products (Kannan, 2008).
insurable population being covered
joint venture partners who have
by insurance (Superbrands, 2011b). d) Threats related to the insurance
strong capital bases.
The Internet has not really led to more sector: Several factors threaten the
• LIC has a strong presence in rural penetration for insurance in India. Call insurance industry.These include:
areas, while in metros and major centres entrusted with the work of
■
33
Thinking Cap
• Threats due to external changes: II - New initiatives in the insurance • Yeshaswini Insurance scheme was
The last decade has seen sector: The second innovation issue deals launched by the Karnataka
unprecedented social, technological, with new initiatives. These are new government which provides coverage
environmental , economic, and practices, products, strategies or other for major surgical operations,
political (STEEP) changes initiatives which have spurred innovation including those pertaining to pre-
(Pricewaterhousecoopers, 2011) which is the key to the growth of the existing conditions, to Indian farmers
threatening the very survival of sector. A sample of these initiatives who previously had no access to
insurance firms. include: insurance.
• Nat Cats: The severity and frequency a) Customer related initiatives: d) Product related initiatives:
of catastrophic events, both natural
• A private player in the insurance • A major corporate entity has been
and man-made, have been increasing considering various options to
industry took the lead to start a 24-
over the past twenty years .
hour call centre, an initiative to aid provide Health insurance to
Reinsurance firms are likely to
customer convenience. Now, all customers who cannot afford it, by
increase their pricing rates in the light paying for the same on purchase of
companies provide this facility.
of increasing claims due to natcats
their products.
(Ernst & Young, 2010). • Similarly, another player has initiated
a first of its kind health movement - • A microfinance institution, has been
• Competition : The intense 'Health Promise'. Through their new bundling agricultural and livestock
competition in the insurance market credit with mandatory weather and
website, customers are able to get
has posed challenges for companies.
health advice from renowned doctors livestock insurance schemes.
Premium rates have been driven and specialists, read health and
down over the past few years by • The public sector life insurance
fitness related information and most behemoth has a proud record of
heightened competition amidst
importantly get details of Health innovative products that find instant
falling loyalty among policyholders
insurance. acceptance and success. There are
(Mcinerney, 2010). Detariffing has
impacted the price realisation on b) Channel and distribution related several examples to establish this fact.
products such as Fire insurance. initiatives: • A private non-life player has found
• Expense ratios: Several Indian • The life insurance leader has launched that its experience with index-based
insurance companies suffer from very a new initiative called Chief Life weather insurance has been
high expense ratios which are close to Insurance Advisors (CLIA) designed to extremely positive.
30% of premiums (Ernst & Young, incentivise senior agents. The e) Administration and technology
2010). response to this initiative was so related initiatives:
overwhelming that some 20,000
• Financial issues: While private CLIAs brought over ~1100 er. in • The life insurance leader operates a
insurers face the problems of delayed successful Enterprise Document
premium within one year against 1.1
break evens, all the firms are facing Management System (EDMS) project
million new policies.
the issue of new capital requirements wherein the customer and office
to be mandated by Solvency II norms • Several companies have developed records have been digitalised.
soon. net-based travel insurance policies,
which can be issued 24 hours a day • It is also working on the largest data
• Frauds: The rising incidence of frauds warehouse implementation project
through the internet.
is driving up costs for insurance wherein it is developing a central
companies. c) Governmentinitiatives: repository of all masters and
irda journal November 2012
All aspects of SWOT analysis create • The Government of Andhra Pradesh transactions for the entire banking,
innovation challenges. While strengths has piloted the 'Arogya Sri' health financial services and insurance sector
provide the challenge of sustainability, insurance scheme in three districts (Superbrands, 2011a).
weaknesses challenge the capabilities, and has issued health insurance cards New initiatives create innovation
opportunities challenge the creative to 18 million below the poverty line challenges in terms of their sustenance
instincts and threats provide challenges in families (Nishant, 2009). and most importantly industry wide
relation to externalities. adoption for the benefit of the entire
■
34
i
.....
!l!!ll!!m!l
sector. • The SKDRDP Trust offers a voluntary • The regulator has mandated that
health microinsurance program for its proposal documents should be in
III - Insurance industry best practices:
members and their families. The easily understandable language. The
Over a period of time, several practices
scheme has reached more than a advertisements issued by the insurers
have been perfected by insurance
million individuals till date should not mislead the insuring
companies, which can be termed as best
(Ruchismita and Varma, 2009). public. All insurers are required to set
practices or success stories. These
up proper grievance redress
practices can provide light regarding key • BASIX has rolled out a credit life
machinery.
to growth action plans for the insurance insurance scheme for its borrowers
sector. Some of these success stories are as that provides insurance for 1.5 times • A challenge before the IRDA is to
follows: the value of the loan, thus protecting ensure that it takes a broad view on
BASIX and providing borrowers' the issue of competition and come out
• Settling 97% of all maturity claims on
families with some liquidity in the with prescriptions which are fair, just
or before the due date.
event of borrower ' s death and equitable to all the players and at
• Developing one of the best agency (Ruchismita and Varma 2009). the same time maintain the primacy
models in the sector, with high- of the policy holder.
quality, better trained agents; and a IV - Regulatory facilitation of the
insurance sector: Avery important key to • Finally, IRDA faces the challenge of
dedicated team has been deployed in
growth of the insurance industry is creating customer trust by sending a
agency distribution to embed cross
regulatory facilitation. IRDA must facilitate message that the companies licensed
sell culture and drive execution of
innovation which can spur the growth of by it are meant to last for a long time.
focused campaigns (Superbrands,
the sector. The following are certain This alone will ensure that people will
2011b).
important issues in this regard. buy more insurance because the
• Achieving the lowest acquisition cost regulator has assured them of the
levels in the industry due to the lower • IRDA has evolved mechanisms by
longevity of the companies (Baru,
which private insurance companies
infrastructure and set-up costs thanks 2010).
do not skim the market by focusing on
to its existing bank network
rich and upper class clients and in the From the issues discussed above, several
(Krishnamurthy, 2005).
process neglect a major section of innovation challenges can be identified
India's population. which have been summarised in Table 1.
TABLE 1
INNOVATION BASED GROWTH CHALLENGES
AREA ISSUE INNOVATION CHALLENGE
Strengths Robust grievance redressal mechanisms Communicating the mechanism and
ensuring effective usage
Strong distribution network Enabling all players to get distribution advantage
Strong foreign joint venture partners Enabling foreign partners to face the global financial crisis
Strong presence of a player in rural areas Emulation of the player by other firms
Basket of several products Making basket relevant to customer needs
Strong pool of skilled professionals Retaining professionals and ensuring skills upgradation
Weaknesses Low awareness of insurance products among customers Improving customer awareness I
Inability of internet in increasing penetration for insurance Using the internet in a targeted and effective manner
Poor customer relationship management in call centres Improving call centre efficiency
Over dependence on unit linked products Broad basing product portfolio
irda journal November 2012
Premium rates being set very unscientifically Improving the premium setting process
Poor retention of tied up agents Improving relations with agents
Absence of risk based solvency management Adopting better solvency management techniques
Lack of robust and effective fraud risk management processes Improving fraud risk management systems
Opportunities Detariffing of the insurance sector Using detariffing effectively for proper pricing
Experimenting with new distribution channels like postal services Using new channels effectively
Targeting tier 2 and tier 3 cities Managing costs of penetrating tier 2 and tier 3 cities
Appropriate pricing of insurance products Using scientific techniques of pricing
■
35
Thinking Cap
TABLE 1 (Contd..)
INNOVATION BASED GROWTH CHALLENGES
AREA ISSUE INNOVATION CHALLENGE I
Threats External environment changes Developing strategies to manage environmental changes
Natural Catastrophes Creation of reserves
Intense competition Innovating to stay ahead of competition
Delayed break evens Creating appropriate financial staying power
High expense ratios Developing cost management strategies
New initiatives Customer related, Channel and distribution related, Product Sustaining new initiatives and spreading of the initiatives
related Administration and technology related among majority players in the market
and Government initiatives
Best practices Quick settlement of maturity claims, creation of best agency Adopting best practices by major players
models and lowering acquisition cost for the sector’s growth
Regulation Regulations to avoid: Ensuring that the regulator works closely with all
facilitation - skimming the market the stakeholders to ensure sectoral growth
- customer distrust
- unfair, unjust and inequitable regulation
INNOVATION BASED GROWTH DRIVERS challenges enunciated earlier have been As Table 2 points out, the various growth
classified into growth drivers in the drivers are related to customer,
Innovation based growth challenges have
following Table 2. distribution, financial, human resources,
to be classified appropriately to derive
strategic marketing and technical
growth drivers. Growth drivers can be
TABLE 2 innovations. Therefore innovation in its
used for development of action plans. The INNOVATION BASED GROWTH DRIVERS
INNOVATION CHALLENGE INNOVATION BASED GROWTH DRIVER
Communicating grievance redressal mechanisms to customers and Customer related innovation
ensuring their effective usage
Making product basket relevant to customer needs
Improving customer awareness of products
Improving customer care efficiency
Enabling all players to get distribution advantage Distribution related innovation
Using the internet in a targeted and effective manner
Improving relations with agents
Using new channels effectively
Insulating foreign partners from global financial crisis Financial innovation
Adopting better risk management techniques
Improving fraud risk management systems
Managing costs of penetrating tier 2 and tier 3 cities
Creation of catastrophe reserves
Creating appropriate financial staying power
Developing cost management strategies
Retaining professionals and ensuring skills upgradation Human resources related innovation
Sustaining new marketing initiatives and spreading of the initiatives among
majority players in the market Marketing innovation
Broad basing the product portfolio
Adopting best practices by major players Strategic innovation
irda journal November 2012
■
36
various facets is the key to the growth of Ernst & Young. (2010). Insurance industry: Pricewaterhousecoopers. (2011). What
-
i
!l!!ll!!m!l
the insurance sector. These facets have Retrospection and opportunities . the future holds: Insurance 2020,
been elaborated in the next section. Retrieved from http://www.ey.com/india Retrieved from
(To be continued.. .) Ernst & Young . (2011). Insurance http://www.pwc.com/insurance
companies concerned about rising Ruchismita, R and Varma, S. (2009).
References
incidents of fraud. Retrieved from Providing Insurance through Microfinance
Anders, W.H. (2010). The Private Sector http://www.ey.com/india Institutions: The Indian Experience, Brief
Insurance Industry in India, Retrieved of International Food Policy Research
ICAI. (2011).Insurance- The growth sector
from Institute, Retrieved from
http://www.indiainsurancereview.com of our times . Retrieved from
http://www.ifpri.org
http://www.icai.org
Bakhshi, s. (2005). Integrated Approach:
irda.in. (2011). Statistics of insurers. Singhvi, N and Bhatt, P. (2008) .
Key to Growth and Development, Vikalpa,
Retrieved from http://www.irda.in Distribution Channels in Life Insurance.
Vol. 30(3), pp.108-110.
Bimaquest - Vol. VIII (I), January issue, pp.
Baru, S. (2010). Anew business model has Kannan, R. (2008).Second Generation of 20-40.
to develop to increase insurance Reform in Indian Insurance Industry:
Prospects and Challenges. Retrieved from Superbrands. (2011a). Life Insurance
penetration and make it more useful: IRDA
Corporation , Retrieved from
Chairman, Retrieved from http://www.icrier.org
http://www.superbrands.com
http://www.businessstandard.com Krishnamurthy, S. (2005). Insurance
Superbrands. (2011b). Max New York Life,
Chakravarthi, D.N.K.L.N.K. (2008).ULIPS in Sector: Challenges of Competition and
Future Scenario, Vikalpa, Vol. 30(3), pp. 96- Retrieved from
the Indian Insurance Industry: Status,
http://www.superbrands.com
Challenges and the Way Forward. Paper 101.
presented at 11th Global Conference of Terwiesch, C and Ulrich K.T. (2009).
Mcinerney, T. (2010). India presents
Actuaries , Retrieved from lucrative opportunities in insurance Innovation Tournaments, Harvard
http://www.actuariesindia.org sector , Retrieved from Business School Press.
----------------------
Moving... ~
19
IADAJcumal
From 'Library' to 'ln1er:ni!I'
can.eel
irda journal November 2012
■
37
¬˝∑§Ê‡Ê∑ ∑§Ê§‚¥Œ‡Ê
3ffi3fcficfif~'~~•1R~ I
~mi:rm~~~~ 1 ~~~~w.mr C\ .~t c..1IZlU L{\.
# 3lfaRcf<:1 ~<:1cf><:11 ~ ~ dJlq~lJcfi<:11 %~ v'-1 t: l
\z. “u∫ åÁ∫ÁÆm
~f~l-Jl[Of 4BTT ~ ~ WIB ~ &fcfi ~ ~ ~
•äÿˇÊ
■
38
ŒÎÁc≈U ∑§ÙáÊ
II
Or.Eg.AmB©.AmB© Zo {d{^Þ àH$ma H$s A{Z`{_VVmAm| go nZnZo dmbo ZH$mamË_H$ ~mø à^mdm| H$s dOh go CËnm{XV
Z¡{VH$ Omo{I_m| H$mo H$_ H$aZo hoVw `o Zr{VJV Cnm` àñV{dV {H$E h¡Ÿ&
lr nrQ>a ~«m_wba
AÜ`j, AmB©.E.AmB©.Eg. H$m`©H$mar g{_{V
hm±bm{H$ h_ `h _mZVo h¡ {H$ E{e`m _| Am{W©H$ {dH$mg H$s J{V VoµO hþB© h¡, {H$ÝVw h_| A^r ^r `yamo g§H$Q>, ~‹T>Vr
C_« dmbr Am~mXr Ed§ àmH¥${VH$ AmnXm O¡gr ~‹S>r Ed§ O{Q>b Omo{I_m| Ho$ {déÕ ~ohVa VarHo$ go ~Mmd H$aZo hoVw
ñd`§ H$mo Am¡a ^r gm_Ï`©dmZ ~ZmZo H$s OéaV h¡Ÿ&
lr h|J ñdr H$sQ>
{ejm _§Ìr, qgJmnwa gaH$ma
Am{W©H$ A^md Ho$ Xm¡a Zo ~¢H$m| Ed§ amÁ` H$s AW©ì`dñWm Ho$ ~rM gm_§Oñ` ~ZmZo na ~hþV Omoa {X`m h¡Ÿ& h_ bmoJm| Zo
B{Vhmg go Omo H$ï>àX grI br h¡ Cgo ^ybmZm Ag§^d Wm {H$ÝVw A§VV: h_| ^ybmZm n‹S>mŸ&
lr Am§S´> ~¡br
à~ÝY {ZXoeH$, n«yS>|{e`b {~OZog `y{ZQ>, E\$EgE, `y.Ho$.
2011 _| AmñQ´>o{b`m Ed§ Ý`wOrb|S> _| hmoZo dmbr V~mhr Zo nwZ~r©_mH$Vm©Am| H$s ~r_m gwajm _| H$_r `m ~r_m gwajm XoZo Ho$
àmdYmZm| _| \o$a ~Xb H$aZo Ho$ {bE ~mÜ` {H$`m h¡ {Og_o Hw$N> H$da _| Vmo _yë`dY©Z H$s ^mar OéaV h¡Ÿ&
lr B`Z bm\$brZ
gXñ`, AñQ´>o{b`m àwS>oÝe`b {Z`_Z àm{YH$aU
h_bmoJ ~a_wS>m _| hmoZo dmbo ì`dgm` Ed§ Bg ~mOma Ho$ JwU-AdJwUr H$mo Ü`mZ _| aIVo hþE Eogo C{MV _mZH$m| H$mo AnZmZo
H$m bú` aIVo h¡{Oggo {H$ h_mar g§aMZmE± H$m\$s hX VH$ ì`mdhm[aH$ ~Zr ahoŸ&
lr Ooao_r H$m°Šg
grB©Amo, ~a_yS>m _m¡{ÐH$ àm{YH$aU
irda journal November 2012
~r_m CÚmoJ H$mo {g\©$ n¡go Ho$ ~ohVa [aQ>Z© (bm^) Ho$ én _| Zht XoIm OmZm Mm{hEŸ& g_` Ho$ gmW Am{W©H$ gwajm Ed§
dm{f©H$s (EÝ`wQ>r) hr ~r_m ì`dgm` Ho$ Ho$ÝÐ {~ÝXw hm|JoŸ&
lr Oo. h[a Zmam`U
AÜ`j, ~r_m {Z`m_H$ Am¡a {dH$mg àm{YH$aU, ^maV
II
■
39
~ ~ ~~ljs.;~ittt
gw~moY Hw$_ma Ed§ hare MÝÐ aVyS>r H$hVo h¡ {H$ BÊQ>aZoQ> AmYm[aV godmAm| _| J«mhH$ H$mo AŠga gd©a _| Iam~r H$s
I
iiii=~• ~11&'1qr·11
1& ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ M ~~ ,t.
fd;k x;kA
t ~ i* * ~ !if!
1&i1J:1 it~lit
l~~ ~!its'IYI t& f,}
~ ~ ~ ti i i -! l i ~ ~ f
~~~1~~f~~t~i~tg~~~~~~~~~ ~I
pñW{V H$m gm_Zm H$aZm n‹S>Vm h¡Ÿ&
r,~
!~-itw 1w~i &!~f&1tr~&~~l
~r:R)R)
:~~1w1w~~1~~f&~ 1i~1'Wil~
f&;r&~[~1i1wJrtit~i~l~l~~1
l~
~~
ii
J"" !""1a; t& 1 ~ i .- ~i1&
t&ji"" ~ ~ lio ~ 1& "=
l; ?tl~i!t ~ l ~!i!ti I
n[admX àH$aU
t
iw ~
I ~1!1 lj
rtB' ~ (1&~;-w 1 ! 11&
i'fyi ~.;;; 1 ~ - 1!
i!tlliili~i~~l~~,,,t,lili it
■
40
irda journal November 2012
i
.....
!l!!ll!!m!l
~ I ~ ~ ~ '1<TT I #rTT x=cr=q ~ cZl<l 61"1 l-11 GI a I &RT cITTc ctft ~ sf.ft ~ I cnW 3fjl-lR t
~ - l $ p ~ ~ I ~-l"xfctcpl fw:rr~I ~ cpx "f1"cfj"ill ftp ~ ~ 6fTc:" cITTl=f
~~~fi~-i '1fR ctft "f1"C'1'IB ~I #rTT mrT ~ ar,r if <ffi ~ cpf tf""~
~ "ITT ~ I cllclfil<l ~ ~
~1~~fi~.-i ~ ~alcl ~ 6fTc:- ~ l=fT,'[T ~ftp-~-¥~-~
~ ffl ~ 'f11TTCd' ~ -qx
~ cpf ~~~ #rTT ~ -l ~ cpf ~ qffiJq if clllcl$1Rc/5
m cpl~ f.TTmT M t1 WR
~~~tM~~l"xfctcf6f
'tR@c,f -qx m cfcp ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ xl f.1T@ ctft ll<fr t
■
41
!~~i~~~~ lj~i~~11i~~11t!t~~~~11~~~~~ ,~~~
r. f ~ta 1 f.i ~J 1& 1tr 1tr 1J i 1& 1& i 1 1& ~ t t ~ta ~ ti Jl': i
i" ! h
~ ~ ~ _r& ~ g ~ f ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ -~i g1& I ~ ~ : & I : ~ 'I& t I t f l'.; I 'w ! I! 'Ii?. ~ ! !
1< s:J-tc ! ~ w i,jtil:%1 ~fl~ f 1<-W1& ~ ~ ~1<4&1&f\t;1& de' dh ~
}ii& re; it! l !,;z1&.;;!1& ~! r~if !1&tl; I& I; ~it! rli i ijii
,jC
~ ~ J?: ~ ~ ~
ii !
~ I i~ 1e ~ I l J t i i %~ : ~ ; i ! I : t ! ! 'I& ~ i ~ ~ f I ; -, -U'
~ I 1: ~ ~ t~ ~ ~ 1s ~ 1s i
i
~ · 1 I ii~ t Ji~~
I ~ l l g ~ f I I I i ~ I ! 1 ~ ~ ; ~ -i ~ i i 1~ ! I I I g: ~ ~ ~ ij ! ~ I
O.;r :
<w ~ ~ i t i ~ ~ ~ :·i t ~ ~ .- ! j ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ i f I 1 ! ~ ! -
i ~f~ 'I&.;; ; ~ is' f ~ i 'I& 1 i ~ ts~ ta: I1& ~ l i I !]!
ds fy, ,d gh fu;a=d
dqN ns'kksa esa cSafdax vkSj
'kh"kZd esa cSad vkSj chek
foRrh; lsokvksa ds
!,je,je~i,&il~f1&!?i1i~;!jiJJ1li1<li
~-f I ! I i 4& ~ ~ i g ~ ~ ! - ~ ~ - I ·_! ~ <w
laLFkk gSA
,t i i ! ,r.
e~;]1~~1ltllijtlji!ilt!1tif1~~
! is= ~ 1s t ~ 1. . ~ ~ ~ ! i ·~ t ·)~ f ~ ~ I ~ ~ _'W 1& ~ i ~ ~
'firj
~, ~~ii~ %~~~~~! ti~f§~i~ t,gi~
1,lltti~1!ti!~~1,t1~g:~1-il~!11
~ i ~ ~ ~ 1 ~ i 1 ; t i ~ , i ~ i·<w i i i 11s ~ ~ ~ ~
1s ~ r i -w ~ -~ ~
!Ii
r& r&
f
~G
I& I _
tt,fi, 1-1&.;;f,! ,w~i1~~l~&~jj!ft~!~tsi1&l! i !Ji&"!j
f
~ 1.;;: ii~ 1& i ~ ~ 1! 14& ~ I ~ I ! ?ii - I ~ti iii i
~~~ i i 4& ~ ~ lr2
,t ~G w~ ! ~ 1
1l1i
B'. r&
n[admX àH$aU
42
irda journal November 2012
~ ■
43
irda journal November 2012
$1;l~~~1,,~ !gjfll~~;!;~!llt!Jl!jtl!l;ti!~J
:~4£~111 !1~ i- ;l~ 1 1~~"!i~1&~~!li !t~di--~1,li
! $~ i i I i iI i! l f! ii I1& : ! I ll f!~ l ~ ~ t !I i ' ! Ii ~ I ~ t 4£
tfj,!*f~l~I
1trJ ~~t l~i~
1 It!~ ~J ~i~¥t! ~ti1f11&lizltl~1~
f~~~tw~!~1& ~~~;i~t~~~i~t~~t~"i~
~ i~ ~ $1~~ '!& · 1 fg~~i *~~ 1w _ ~~~
Iii~ ~1 IIi 1 ~i lJt r~ iiJ ~ ii ~ji ~•
f&~
!11tri Ld l"i! i ~4£
it j ·! ! ~ ~ t ~ j i t ~ l i 1· i ~ I t -~ t i i ~
1si~ 1 1& %-t .1&!; 1,1s ~~~tr~11"~ 1r
ifjisz{; esa ekuk tkrk gS
1 11 ~ 1 , ii!;1?;1"1,1 11Ji:;tn
U;k;ky; esa thr Hkh
fd lsokiznkrk vxj
xzkgd lEcU/kksa ds
!'!& !i'i!
my>u ls cpus ds
fy, os f'kdk;r u
i;11i1-•r!tliil
,d my>u ls
1ltr- ,~1*~li,~•••1Ji1-1&1~i
gSaA
~ l ~ g ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ ~* t t ~ ~ ~
1: ! J!' "'- 1 g1& :·.;~i1 1s J?:tJ!'1&•i ~ Ej~t
li .. ~-
1&•~•~
10
t2. [
!1
t!f ~i I ,f -& fl~ ~1 iii~ ~j ~ iti·l ~
ti~~~ffJ~tlJ*~J~~~~i~ !-~ft~ifj~,i~li~~*il
~ ~!i'lri! ~ I ~,;;;,I l _JL"' Ji! it:; ~.1&,;;; ~, ff!.;;; la
iif t i! i!i; ;i I ~ ' ; ~ i , . 1& I t lt i i ;, ,~ ~ i ~ I ; ~ t II ~
~,,s'Wjt
f< i
44
irda journal November 2012
i
.....
!l!!ll!!m!l
~ 1 ~~ (m ~ xl¼TT)
~ cf> ~ ~qRRJa ~ ~ t, (eof AJbo A§H$ _o....)
~ 2002 cf> ~ 10 (1) ~ -ij
#flrr ~ m-~ cf> IDxT ?ill' "GfT
~ t
fcn #flIT ~ '§'<'11cl5c ¥ti 3PRfr~cfi~WTT
~~ m$=rr 1f?f ~~cf> m cf> ~ (1Cp ~ 'lft ~ m
Gxl ~ cf> ~ ~ cpl"~ '¥>f
~fcn~~ffls3TTtl
~ ~ cf> ~ ¢Ill f <:>1 <I ~
~~~~l#flrr~c151"
irda journal November 2012
■
45
statistics non-life insurance
55000
50000
45000
40000
Premium (M In Crores)
35000
34,001 34,001
irda journal November 2012
25000 23,748
22,163
20000 18,672
16,586
14,063
15000
11,387
9,628
10000
6,507
5,622
5000
0
April May June July August September Total
Mr. G.N. Bajpai, (ex-Chairman, LIC of India & SEBI) and Director on the Board of IIRM delivered the convocation
address and awarded diplomas to the successful students.
Mr. J. Hari Narayan, Chairman, IRDA / IIRM presented the prize money cheques to the candidates who stood
1st, 2nd and 3rd in the IPGD programme (2011-12 batch) and 1st in the Actuarial Sciences programme
(2010-11 batch).
The following students won the prize money and the gold medal in various categories:
(i) Ms. Anusha Palla - SBI Life prize money `1.00 lakh and a gold medal
(ii) Mr. Vishnu Murali – Tata AIG Life Insurance prize money `1.00 lakh and a gold medal
(iii) Mr. Ashish Nandan Choudhary – Tata AIG General Insurance prize money `1.00 lakh and a gold medal.
■
47
round up
■
48
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
Statistical Supplement
(Monthly - August, 2012) irda journal August 2012
49
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Credit Guarantee 61.87 162.67 9.00 35.00 -62.10 -355.81 932847.00 2423279.00
Previous year 123.97 518.48 17.00 91.00 11.72 -598.55 235300.00 2157538.00
All Other Miscellaneous 1683.53 7728.27 51530.00 255207.00 288.81 431.44 2710388.00 11642076.00
Previous year 1394.73 7296.83 43081.00 250385.00 181.08 94.45 3150083.00 13384149.00
Grand Total 33755.32 162030.54 595346 2755985 6540.74 26214.74 115310146.00 513762689.00
Previous year (Total) 27214.58 135815.80 565945 2786164 4214.84 15971.37 92793161.00 382389439.00
■
*Wherever applicable
50
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
128.60 953.00 2445.00 12809.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
68.81 661.04 2432.00 12782.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
34.89 180.18 835.00 3923.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
15.52 123.57 702.00 3466.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
34.89 180.18 835 3923 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
15.52 123.57 702 3466 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
45.71 387.40 158.00 1001.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
51.45 443.03 231.00 783.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1069.52 5151.82 1137.00 5648.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
784.95 4477.03 48950.00 115524.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
519.28 2465.18 33900.00 151871.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
364.87 1894.33 1232.00 39498.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1588.80 7617.00 33900 151871 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
1149.82 6371.36 48950 115524 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
29.39 163.48 272.00 1280.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
24.42 188.72 218.00 1421.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
64.50 256.10 16.00 106.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.69 206.26 6.00 2549.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
93.90 419.58 288 1386 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
25.11 394.98 224 3970 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
41.48 249.17 4688.00 21068.00 17.34 48.90 41288.00 118572.00
55.56 239.52 6346.00 21460.00 3.40 15.40 7879.00 35105.00
867.21 1885.55 2601.00 11440.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 156979.00 640386.00
128.42 551.41 2589.00 10199.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 170843.00 511764.00
50.38 293.49 2000.00 11472.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
917.59 2179.03 4601 22912 0.00 0.00 0 0 156979 640386
128.42 551.41 2589 10199 0.00 0.00 0 0 170843 511764
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
105.09 531.97 4833.00 21441.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
258.26 1512.89 15960.00 54493.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2956.06 12517.33 51748 236411 17.34 48.90 41288 118572 156979 640386
irda journal August 2012
1752.95 10297.80 77434 222677 3.40 15.40 7879 35105 170843 511764
51
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous 93.90 552.40 1576.00 6674.00 93.90 458.50 271396.76 844888.60
Previous year 65.19 345.79 1384.00 6612.00 65.19 280.60 75379.21 388140.88
Grand Total 8375.03 48497.68 74318 363477 8375.03 40122.64 1724412.98 15478823.93
Previous year (Total) 6071.11 32411.47 52918 246742 6071.11 26340.35 1030047.11 11875971.45
■
*Wherever applicable
52
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
21.12 97.89 1223.00 5437.00
11.29 48.26 1154.00 5419.00
-0.19 1.59 0.00 12.00
0.25 0.60 4.00 13.00
-0.19 1.59 0 12 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.25 0.60 4 13 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
2.40 17.49 7.00 42.00
0.60 7.61 4.00 31.00
246.57 1532.93 5462.00 28167.00
143.26 548.66 3061.00 12380.00
129.17 560.27 0.00
70.29 257.60 0.00 0.00
375.73 2093.20 5462 28167 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
213.55 806.26 3061 12380 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.87 3 2.00 9.00
0.04 2 1.00 8.00
3.60 1
0
0.87 7.08 2 10 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.04 1.85 1 8 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
30.70 204.15 90.00 370.00
22.23 147.48 83.00 526.00
9.00 182.52 31.00 158.00
9.22 37.23 61.00 336.00
9.00 182.52 31 158 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
9.22 37.23 61 336 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
10.23 76.86 1172.00 4904.00
8.61 34.55 1094.00 5326.00
449.87 2680.78 7987 39100 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
irda journal August 2012
265.79 1083.85 5462 24039 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
53
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year - - - - - - - -
Credit Guarantee - - - - - - - -
Previous year - - - - - - - -
All Other Miscellaneous 98.2 509.8 3,478 19,798 (265.2) (548.9) 222,797 2,118,567
Previous year 363.4 1,058.7 3,641 31,881 150.6 (307.3) 278,778 1,923,528
Grand Total 12,758.9 66,185.2 85,814 444,045 2,922.6 11,568.5 4,660,956.7 41,825,603.9
Previous year (Total) 9,836.3 54,616.7 84,588 434,469 2,518.7 14,735.7 21,083,037.5 44,130,490.9
■
*Wherever applicable
54
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.3 2.9 7 45 - - - -
59.3 59.3 26 26 - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
0.3 4.0 2 14 - - - -
49.6 157.5 295 1,407 - - - -
387.0 2,226.3 8,505 49,150 - - - -
259.7 1,323.7 6,103 30,605 - - - -
220.2 1,173.7 8,541 49,441 - - - -
149.2 668.4 6,127 30,723 - - - -
607.1 3,400.0 8,541 49,441 - - - -
408.9 1,992.1 6,127 30,723 - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
2,027.3 8,718.6 - 18 - - 602,067 3,783,999
15.1 4,966.6 - - - - 11,331 3,367,047
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
2,027.3 8,718.6 - 18 - - 602,067 3,783,999
15.1 4,966.6 - - - - 11,331 3,367,047
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
43.9 203.4 1,423 8,121 - - - -
29.8 255.6 1,372 10,815 - - - -
2,678.9 12,329.0 9,973 57,639 - - 602,067 3,783,999 - -
irda journal August 2012
562.7 7,431.0 7,820 42,971 - - 11,331 3,367,047 - -
55
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
■
*Wherever applicable
56
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
63.74 451.40 202 1250
26.72 376.62 298 1151
11.57 365.64 63 376
13.31 206.64 36 239
11.57 365.64 63 376 0.00 0.00 0 0
13.31 206.64 36 239 0.00 0.00 0 0
15.05 80.26 61 279
10.27 73.57 59 196
279.59 1,376.10 3935 20532
268.89 1,304.19 4094 21920
156.91 837.77
149.62 725.68 -
436.50 2,213.86 3935 20532 0.00 0.00 0 0
418.50 2,029.87 4094 21920 0.00 0.00 0 0
4.34 55.26 29 194
5.80 57.85 32 132
- 1.24 16.18 15 33
0.50 8.98 1 8
3.10 71.44 44 227 0.00 0.00 0 0
6.30 66.84 33 140 0.00 0.00 0 0
7.93 56.31 448 3465 0.93 7.92 3689 36919
17.35 68.22 159 1373
21.83 66.73 103 483 37788 158181
11.01 109.73 55 363 276 4995
3.72 25.95 205 1442
3.09 23.59 189 1440
25.55 92.69 308 1925 0.00 0.00 0 0 37788 158181
14.09 133.32 244 1803 0.00 0.00 0 0 276 4995
157.42 744.79 2317 12057
34.34 171.94 1037 4593
720.85 4076.39 7378 40111 0.93 7.92 3689 36919 37788 158181
irda journal August 2012
540.88 3127.02 5960 31415 0.00 0.00 0 0 276 4995
57
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year - - - - - - - -
Credit Guarantee - - - - -
Previous year - - - - - - - -
All Other Miscellaneous 7,648.99 8,005.43 745 2,986 6,569.14 6,608.49 475,236 2,570,898
Previous year 1,079.86 1,396.94 96 704 844.67 919.52 455,967 1,820,039
Grand Total 22,193.59 97,251.99 247,635 1,269,960 5,809.59 20,014.15 10,571,868 95,737,881
Previous year (Total) 16,384.00 77,237.84 215,145 1,035,380 5,276.12 22,817.85 8,161,659 66,443,156
■
*Wherever applicable
58
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
63.79 705.66 279 1,422 - - - -
75.05 653.03 219 1,009 - - - -
1.13 122.04 23 142 - - - -
2.78 62.26 12 92 - - - -
- 7.82 - 8 - - - -
- 0.51 - 1 - - - -
1.13 129.87 23 150 - - - - - -
2.78 62.77 12 93 - - - - - -
9.83 9.83 1 1 - - - -
- - - - - - - -
10.47 188.06 46 257 - - - -
52.75 139.46 36 187 - - - -
331.28 1,542.27 4,691 23,336 - - - -
251.98 1,525.77 3,793 22,921 - - - -
284.48 1,404.48 14,239 69,714 - - - -
226.50 1,061.23 9,350 53,414 - - - -
615.75 2,946.75 14,239 69,714 - - - - - -
478.48 2,587.00 9,350 53,414 - - - - - -
0.88 19.40 4 19 - - - -
0.14 8.00 3 16 - - - -
0.05 0.18 - 1 - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
2.48 68.99 2 21 - - - -
2.32 72.94 1 15 - - - -
3.41 88.58 6 41 - - - - - -
2.46 80.94 4 31 - - - - - -
148.41 698.11 8,874 45,620 - 33.52 - 37,255
105.48 554.81 8,180 39,831 - 62.29 - 130,833
110.26 1,407.69 1,754 10,611 - - - - 144,233 1,325,165
93.28 1,335.75 1,375 9,238 - 7.81 - 5,683 189,647 612,277
0.33 2.85 23 115 - - - - 85,805 387,210
5.01 13.35 12 96 - - - - 8,397 65,463
110.59 1,410.54 1,777 10,726 - - - - 230,038 1,712,375
98.30 1,349.10 1,387 9,334 - 7.81 - 5,683 198,044 677,740
- 5.18 - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
7,517.52 7,550.54 36 169 - - - -
76.07 179.58 3 33 - - - -
8,480.91 13,733.11 25,281 128,100 - 33.52 - 37,255 230,038 1,712,375
irda journal August 2012
891.37 5,606.68 19,191 103,932 - 70.10 - 136,516 198,044 677,740
59
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
■
*Wherever applicable
60
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
- 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
- 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
- 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
- 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.12 0.84 1 12 0.00 0.00 - -
804.05 4,882.49 - - - 0.00 - -
1,037.34 5,244.42 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
648.21 3,514.60 25,460 139,325 - 0.00 - -
764.49 3,736.04 27,544 138,552 0.00 0.00 - -
1452.26 8397.09 25460 139325 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
1801.84 8980.46 27544 138552 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
- 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
- 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
- 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
(18.36) 121.62 - - 0.00 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
-18.36 121.62 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 - - - 0.00 - -
0.00 0.00 - - 0.00 5.30 - 58,502
1462.84 9,805.95 239 1,322 0.00 104.79 - 47,574 991,567 7,275,557
3,276.73 16,893.83 278 1,362 96.07 205.51 41,405 88,966 1,811,001 8,895,989
9.96 67.99 232 1,497 - 0.00 - - 56,381 363,950
11.06 44.04 229 1,076 0.00 0.00 - - 42,447 233,068
1472.81 9873.95 471 2819 0.00 104.79 0 47574 1047948 7639507
3287.79 16937.87 507 2438 96.07 205.51 41405 88966 1853448 9129057
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
5,001 10,022 382 584 - - - -
5,192 5,971 510 680 - - - -
7925.82 28292.82 26313 142728 0.00 104.79 0 47574 1047948 7639507
irda journal August 2012
10263.01 32011.80 28562 141682 96.07 210.82 41405 147468 1853448 9129057
61
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous 4795.68 12795.26 31583.00 137864.00 2283.12 4795.68 3765099.55 10045578.17
Previous year 3164.10 8610.53 6270 40587 695.79 3164.10 127656707.06 335208720.75
Grand Total 21814.85 101210.55 354908 1450005 3049.21 21814.85 9522074.04 51686968.40
Previous year (Total) 15849.25 85329.12 296456 1607972 -415.74 15849.25 169054582.80 575831924.41
■
*Wherever applicable
62
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
27.31 108.12 751 2571.00
212.93 331.70 2068 6995.00
0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.21 9.96 4.00 26.00
18.92 30.93 22.00 44.00
640.46 2790.00 36839.00 172803.00
971.26 2933.47 57501.00 143074.00
515.50 2321.56 0.00 0.00
604.45 1531.15 0.00 0.00
1155.96 5111.56 36839 172803 0.00 0.00 0 0
1575.71 4464.62 57501 143074 0.00 0.00 0 0
3 13 43 178
5 9 83 98
0 0 0 1
2 2 3 5
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1 3 51 166
0 1 13 27
3.68 15.90 94 345 0.00 0.00 0 0
6.94 11.02 99 130 0.00 0.00 0 0
78.47 440.10 1018 3985 3.99 28.18 79814 458035
87.50 398.93 324 2014 4.95 22.75 98963 454034
1676.02 4037.47 169 433 1209.82 3555.86 721506 2115800
751.94 3350.05 260 559 83.16 362.10 42094 183332
0.00 0.00 0 0
1676.02 4037.47 169 433 1209.82 3555.86 721506 2115800 0 0
751.94 3350.05 260 559 83.16 362.10 42094 183332 0 0
2152.06 3563.15 3878 19044.00 1977.26 2603.17 216544 269497
2526.12 2836.98 3737 15908.00 1084.72 1115.86 98190 105984
5093.71 13286.26 42753 199207 3191.07 6187.21 1017864 2843332 0 0
irda journal August 2012
5180.06 11424.23 64011 168724 1172.83 1500.71 239247 743350 0 0
63
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year - - - - - - - -
Credit Guarantee - - - - - - -
Previous year - - - - - - -
All Other Miscellaneous 16.51 147.42 114 544 4.65 (243.63) 53,222 380,386
Previous year 11.86 391.05 97 570 11.86 391.05 59,913 5,290,597
Grand Total 1,086.51 6,908.37 6,925 35,423 3.58 1,944.10 1,263,163 9,128,714
Previous year (Total) 1,082.93 4,964.27 6,944 25,809 1,078.88 4,798.52 509,773 10,962,563
■
*Wherever applicable
64
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
2.47 41.65 12 61
0.19 4.41 5 46 - -
3.27 9.37 40 132
0.61 1.81 6 26 - -
- - - -
3.27 9.37 40 132 - - - -
0.61 1.81 6 26 - - - -
- - - -
2.26 27.14 7 92
2.02 11.55 7 41
48.65 320.19 541 3,804
47.28 208.88 613 2,721
28.56 173.04 - -
23.19 91.31 - -
77.21 493.23 541 3,804 - - - -
70.47 300.18 613 2,721 - - - -
4.59
1.49 2.83 16 16
- - - -
0.39 1.84 14 47
- 1.21 - 12
0.39 6.42 14 47 - - - -
1.49 4.04 16 28 - - - -
0.09 0.30 7 62 0.34 752
0.32 0.32 85 85
- 1.38 3.78 380 1,093
- - - -
- - - - 1.38 3.78 380 1,093
- - - - - - - -
- -
0.53 3.54 3 19 -
0.05 0.39 1 16
86.23 581.65 624 4,217 1.38 4.11 380 1,845
irda journal August 2012
75.16 322.72 733 2,963 - - - -
65
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 -21.96 0 0
All Other Miscellaneous 3347.25 19586.37 72858 374953 342.84 322.73 5628972 61174330
Previous year 3004.41 19263.64 81839 403156 322.33 3633.10 15083941 123672559
Grand Total 66881.00 361496.00 941044 4743630 10043.00 57850.00 63023195 548139027
Previous year (Total) 56838.00 303646.00 911460 4482309 11791.53 55845.46 89432150 655419650
■
*Wherever applicable
66
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
1201.32 3133.40 4847 28688 1275.48 3827.72 0 0 0 0
1429.35 3146.01 6433 35234 1450.44 3620.77 0 0 0 0
53.05 362.04 356 2098 69.86 633.19 0 0 0 0
55.66 332.53 399 2152 59.87 536.16 0 0 0 0
18.97 84.65 74 334 16.88 110.35 0 0 0 0
20.49 94.36 98 298 10.55 127.81 0 0 0 0
72.02 446.69 430 2432 86.74 743.54 0 0 0 0
76.15 426.89 497 2450 70.42 663.96 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
49.18 996.12 240 1464 245.46 1948.41 0 0 0 0
37.23 918.53 306 1731 180.83 1432.62 0 0 0 0
1162.76 5811.40 70054 348913 645.55 3465.96 0 0 0 0
1160.91 5693.17 70366 339784 542.43 2710.37 0 0 0 0
1716.94 8753.01 101879 515402 802.10 4500.45 0 0 0 0
1548.97 7477.88 105130 517070 639.77 3286.46 0 0 0 0
2879.70 14564.40 101879 515402 1447.65 7966.41 0 0 0 0
2709.88 13171.05 105130 517070 1182.21 5996.82 0 0 0 0
56.58 338.62 697 3722 67.53 330.86 0 0 0 0
64.22 316.54 768 3773 51.60 258.83 0 0 0 0
0.55 1.74 14 36 0.36 1.86 0 0 0 0
1.92 2.41 5 27 1.32 2.31 0 0 0 0
0.00 5.82 0 1 0.00 12.92 0 0 0 0
0.00 5.93 0 2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
1.79 9.91 25 128 3.09 95.85 0 0 0 0
1.94 10.18 20 108 2.66 52.38 0 0 0 0
58.92 356.09 736 3887 70.98 441.50 0 0 0 0
68.08 335.06 793 3910 55.57 313.52 0 0 0 0
29.93 211.38 4185 19102 44.60 452.84 19286 102157 171740 970452
32.80 197.33 4335 21922 74.04 408.45 16073 82387 200011 944380
385.45 2925.99 9892 44692 1160.36 9559.46 519542 1863416 352869 1647907
638.85 3369.40 10559 45813 1627.93 6969.73 336614 1424217 365031 1576021
0.83 6.29 17 205 4.44 28.18 106 884 1388 10495
1.30 11.95 40 333 3.15 29.79 90 805 1487 10711
386.28 2932.28 9909 44897 1164.80 9587.64 519648 1864300 354257 1658402
640.15 3381.35 10599 46146 1631.08 6999.52 336704 1425022 366518 1586732
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
525.64 2139.67 16398 82492 181.22 1079.60 6623 31550 37661 246372
567.32 2201.50 22172 101642 234.26 1264.19 7304 46372 62314 297389
5202.99 24780.03 138624 698364 4516.93 26047.66 545557 1998007 563658 2875226
irda journal August 2012
5560.96 23777.72 150265 730105 4878.85 20699.85 360081 1553781 628843 2828501
67
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous 68 156.72 12 31 68.34 156.72 22327 44856
Previous year 0.39 57.54 6 21 0.39 57.54 325.00 5460.77
Grand Total 278.61 1176.33 76 345 278.61 1176.33 134736.47 616474.57
Previous year (Total) 330.73 792.26 427 808 330.73 792.26 63980.96 360594.18
■
*Wherever applicable
68
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
13.11 25.03 2.00 8.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.20 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.20 0 1 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
7.86 11.02 2.00 10.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 2.21 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.62 3.62 548.00 548.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
3.62 3.62 548 548 0.00 0.00 0 0
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
3.20 21.20 1.00 2.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.20 21.31 1 3 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.03 0.98 5 29 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.23 0.33 0 0 0.23 8.94 184.00 4326.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0
1.57 4.49 1 7 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
25.77 63.03 11 58 0.00 0.00 0 0
irda journal August 2012
3.85 6.16 548 553 0.23 8.94 184 4326
69
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Credit Guarantee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
All Other Miscellaneous 1149.02 3231.10 4639.00 22842.00 798.20 1119.30 277080.86 2237793.22
Previous year 350.82 2111.80 3778.00 22022.00 66.13 345.66 221991.31 2862057.05
Grand Total 15791.33 88263.70 207896 1090059 3583.81 10013.77 4889092.14 46549684.83
Previous year (Total) 12207.52 78249.93 207635 1098483 -323.47 9283.78 3902191.53 36466481.39
■
*Wherever applicable
70
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
21.92 678.73 249.00 1972.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
12.23 113.54 117.00 919.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
12.23 113.54 117 919 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
3.69 123.54 11.00 124.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10.52 288.30 56.00 277.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
636.65 2924.60 13743.00 61386.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
445.58 3026.64 11763.00 71591.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
461.76 2365.31 680.00 2638.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
341.20 1926.64 137.00 1287.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1098.41 5289.91 13743 61386 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
786.78 4953.28 11763 71591 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
4.62 22.14 19.00 91.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
8.81 75.10 19.00 96.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.15 3.86 2.00 37.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.20 9.03 7.00 39.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.17 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.91 31.35 15.00 136.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.14 10.87 168.00 615.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10.68 57.35 36 264 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
11.14 95.17 194 751 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
2.33 78.83 121.00 561.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
2.23 58.42 80.00 573.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
72.77 1791.21 210.00 1179.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 155929 2542355
218.76 954.95 342.00 4054.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1194256 1461704
11.52 120.13 1760.00 17716.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6784 45730
25.84 145.65 6172.00 27075.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11155 66202
84.28 1911.34 1970 18895 0.00 0.00 0 0 162713 2588085
244.59 1100.60 6514 31129 0.00 0.00 0 0 1205411 1527906
2.67 6.45 1.00 4.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
182.23 245.75 650.00 3230.00 15.00 60.62 8667.00 11520.00
13.97 486.26 716.00 3983.00 5.49 80.59 1435.00 188435.00
1384.28 7713.16 16532 84464 15.00 60.62 8667 11520 162713 2588085
irda journal August 2012
1103.39 7774.30 19689 111195 5.49 80.59 1435 188435 1205411 1527906
71
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous 149.63 898.15 638.00 4405.00 -85.63 -735.96 29832.55 638104.46
Previous year 235.26 1634.12 648.00 3772.00 -359.09 114.60 38174.85 640515.27
Grand Total 11489.10 64138.18 130040 609440 -297.48 4945.91 4352971.36 25463795.23
Previous year (Total) 11786.58 59192.27 129748 579602 2976.62 14918.92 5035407.22 31862555.68
■
*Wherever applicable
72
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
4.99 17.02 373.00 958.00
4.53 22.08 282.00 1082.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.19 0.67 1.00 4.00
0.36 1.21 4.00 13.00
444.70 2367.21 3423.00 22137.00
487.14 1876.61 5596.00 19941.00
444.70 2367.21 3423 22137 0.00 0.00 0 0
487.14 1876.61 5596 19941 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
43.99 140.09 4427.00 19830.00 0.00 0.08 0.00 236.00
18.60 78.60 4615.00 21409.00 0.12 1.37 399.00 5111.00
1122.26 1881.09 8244.00 23893.00 1025.16 1336.30 301934.00 559160.00 337632.50 1733862.50
844.97 6718.91 7864.00 28786.00 94.32 1701.94 23757.00 421762.00 366918.00 1591625.00
1122.26 1881.09 8244 23893 1025.16 1336.30 301934 559160 337633 1733863
844.97 6718.91 7864 28786 94.32 1701.94 23757 421762 366918 1591625
302.01 2047.28 4208.00 28189.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
195.49 850.39 2712.00 12136.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1918.14 6453.36 20676 95011 1025.16 1336.38 301934 559396 337633 1733863
irda journal August 2012
1551.10 9547.79 21073 83367 94.44 1703.31 24156 426873 366918 1591625
73
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Credit Guarantee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
All Other Miscellaneous 206.67 1240.47 10029.00 37580.00 170.87 995.15 537792.93 14160558.25
Previous year 35.80 245.32 893.00 2691.00 35.20 237.47 88749.82 1439239.08
Grand Total 5167.96 23815.75 47261 208542 3449.30 16277.78 2625711.26 29415613.83
Previous year (Total) 1718.66 7537.98 18471 60063 1567.44 6818.77 858041.70 10856272.34
■
*Wherever applicable
74
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
876.54 3085.65 7502.00 40093.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
261.33 728.71 900.00 7967.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
45.61 145.42 94.00 248.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9.72 34.30 26.00 89.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
159.23 925.59 3006.00 18118.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
5.07 30.73 124.00 533.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
66.81 606.66 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1.19 5.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
226.04 1532.25 3006 18118 0.00 0.00 0 0
6.26 36.49 124 533 0.00 0.00 0 0
4.10 11.54 9.00 20.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.13 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.74 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.10 12.41 9 23 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2442.00 7628.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26679.00 28687.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 2442 7628
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 26679 28687
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9.76 171.88 921.00 10578.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
4.34 16.97 98.00 420.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
1162.05 4947.61 11532 69060 0.00 0.00 0 0 2442 7628
irda journal August 2012
281.65 816.47 1148 9009 0.00 0.00 0 0 26679 28687
75
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
■
*Wherever applicable
76
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
269.76 1320.15 7995 42675 0.00 0.00 0 0
213.51 1055.50 8400 39836 0.00 0.00 0 0
372.46 1758.57 8204 43061 0.00 0.00 0 0
244.66 1094.29 8401 39865 0.00 0.00 0 0
642.22 3078.72 8204.00 43061 0 0.00 0 0
458.17 2149.79 8401 39865 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.01 0.29 34 1872
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
642.22 3078.72 8204 43061 0.01 0.29 34 1872 0 0
irda journal August 2012
458.17 2149.79 8401 39865 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
77
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year - - - - - - - -
Credit Guarantee - - - - - - -
Previous year - - - - - - - -
All Other Miscellaneous 538 2,335 4,528 27,802 - 22,221 110,854
Previous year 401 1,546 6,690 35,232 - - 10,868 57,969
Grand Total 14,569 92,043 210,022 1,014,762 - - 29,418,742 125,585,568
Previous year (Total) 12,704 73,042 207,284 981,175 - - 14,794,832 101,096,354
■
*Wherever applicable
78
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
123 1,246 547 2,765 - -
66 1,048 577 1,274 - - - -
202 1,342 182 829 - -
134 1,053 100 689 - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
202 1,342 182 829 - - - - - -
134 1,053 100 689 - - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
15 196 3 24 - -
15 50 7 31 - - - -
1,220 5,848 32,670 162,447 - -
829 3,941 25,248 119,707 - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
1,220 5,848 32,670 162,447 - - - - - -
829 3,941 25,248 119,707 - - - - - -
1 52 2 16 - -
- 27 - 11 - - - -
67 472 71 401 - -
25 394 81 366 - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
68 524 73 417 - - - - - -
25 421 81 377 - - - - - -
58 301 2,315 10,923
77 423 2,243 11,297 - 472 - 372,245
267 2,454 - 12 270 2,570 944,028 1,920,636
- - - - - - - -
19 131 142 293 - -
86 565 3 210 - - - -
286 2,585 142 305 270 2,570 944,028 1,920,636 - -
86 565 3 210 - - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
- - - - - -
- - - - - - - -
143 710 3,524 21,152 - -
212 742 9,033 37,197 - - - -
2,115 12,752 39,456 198,862 270 2,570 944,028 1,920,636 - -
irda journal August 2012
1,442 8,241 37,292 170,782 - 472 - 372,245 - -
79
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
■
*Wherever applicable
80
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
1138.32 6586.58 7666.00 38367.00 1696.59 2992.55 0.00 0.00
762.90 3947.94 6673.00 37840.00 -136.79 1144.49 0.00 0.00
254.80 1774.95 1431.00 8127.00 37.01 617.90 0.00 0.00
226.41 995.59 878.00 4263.00 -47.78 282.76 0.00 0.00
50.03 126.92 82.00 208.00 5.76 11.07 0.00 0.00
10.07 58.00 55.00 95.00 6.57 8.29 0.00 0.00
304.83 1901.87 1513 8335 42.77 628.97 0 0
236.48 1053.59 933 4358 -41.21 291.05 0 0
1.00 11.93 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
-0.19 12.43 0.00 1.00 -5.11 0.00 0.00 0.00
-38.70 1239.24 322.00 3014.00 -112.63 445.55 0.00 0.00
165.70 713.22 959.00 3234.00 -70.94 368.83 0.00 0.00
4220.94 17944.29 34359.00 252968.00 499.50 3430.55 4656.00 34192.00
3731.20 11776.30 52023.00 248152.00 -374.34 2205.99 27670.00 149300.00
6014.75 21777.33 71929.00 293018.00 538.06 3904.64 7432.00 31703.00
3190.07 11137.77 47287.00 260572.00 -238.51 2220.21 21255.00 79765.00
10235.69 39721.62 71929 293018 1037.56 7335.19 12088 65895
6921.27 22914.07 52023 260572 -612.85 4426.20 48925 229065
85 514 -321 5975 126 285 3679 7583
79 392 9576 11104 10 181 3121 12053
0 2 159 170 0 0 0 0
-1 2 -5 7 -1 1 0 0
0 7 5744 5752 0 1 0 0
2 8 15 27 0 1 0 0
259 1258 2079 8114 -121 351 -1801 6523
-141 747 3079 5685 104 242 1279 5117
344.08 1779.64 7661 20011 5.00 636.95 1878 14106
-61.30 1149.11 12665 16823 112.05 424.48 4400 17170
184.43 839.53 6948.00 25523 1279.80 1683.57 5522219.00 5775276
67.77 474.27 4909.00 26385 77.13 294.31 24405.00 223069
2579.93 10851.19 7543.00 31998 462.39 4127.59 472580.00 3807191 849711 6497042
48.65 3692.87 8779.00 44236 -181.79 3652.38 85519.00 2305553 461701 4125511
6.83 27.51 178.00 553 -3.50 12.60 817.00 1340 2417 8618
5.39 21.95 -4.00 1051 8.16 22.61 -4209.00 3573 -3210 9847
2586.76 10878.70 7721 32551 458.89 4140.19 473397 3808531 852128 6505660
54.04 3714.82 8775 45287 -173.63 3674.99 81310 2309126 458491 4135358
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0
200.73 5185.43 41129.00 122707 528.18 1878.72 38976.00 3040238
1489.39 4594.10 29310.00 98198 40.50 1444.99 22073.00 3071596
14957.14 68144.54 144890 543527 4936.16 19741.69 6048558 12704046
irda journal August 2012
9636.06 38573.55 116247 492698 -810.85 12069.34 181113 5850026
81
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
■
*Wherever applicable
82
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
368.79 2682.09 7266 41780 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
343.61 2324.65 7224 39498 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
98.73 444.00 642 3630 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
66.39 367.17 676 3583 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
12.57 64.10 50 679 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
20.16 86.58 125 792 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
111.30 508.10 692 4309 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
86.55 453.75 801 4105 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
109.34 496.78 499 2675 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
96.26 522.25 514 2481 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
1587.19 8327.35 86339 440579 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
1446.63 7598.84 78290 394005 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
2054.50 11044.98 119602 609794 0.00 0.00 104 165047 66464 371218
1819.77 9032.63 112101 568016 0.00 0.00 125 1476631 1496897 9971132
3641.69 19372.33 119602 609794 0.00 0.00 104 165047 66464 371218
3266.40 16631.47 112101 568016 0.00 0.00 125 1476631 1496897 9971132
74.83 469.44 915 4782 184.67 834.41 0 0 0 0
77.73 426.47 793 4516 189.39 848.83 16 7917 42895 52988
0.06 2.10 3 14 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
1.03 2.82 2 10 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.05 0.05 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.50 0 1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
11.89 125.04 210 1418 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
12.04 111.12 220 1231 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
86.83 596.63 1128 6214 184.67 834.41 0 0 0 0
90.80 540.91 1015 5758 189.39 848.83 16 7917 42895 52988
66.68 460.37 14103 71930 218.85 1625.13 170 1036 924 11777
79.43 582.22 18598 81542 164.58 1638.10 449 205785 42 324145
357.98 1822.66 5712 26717 2129.74 10227.90 40 181 154 685
525.98 1520.95 5112 23311 3194.93 10386.60 406 191472 44856 308717
1.65 15.89 39 399 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
2.18 14.02 36 384 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
359.63 1838.55 5751 27116 2129.74 10227.90 40 181 154 685
528.16 1534.97 5148 23695 3194.93 10386.60 406 191472 44856 308717
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
729.15 4111.79 20153 111103 1132.52 7198.31 425 23131 702 23118
850.29 3738.67 22474 124902 1128.23 4781.49 5978 523826 51300 1541422
5473.41 30066.64 169194 874921 3665.78 19885.75 739 189395 68244 406798
irda journal August 2012
5341.50 26328.89 167875 849997 4677.13 17655.02 6974 2405631 1635990 12198404
83
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
■
*Wherever applicable
84
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
608.25 3313.51 11030 70626 0.00 0.00 0 0
506.88 2761.26 9592 61414 0.00 0.00 0 0
135.38 453.18 1445 8043 0.00 0.00 0 0
104.14 348.60 1290 7181 0.00 0.00 0 0
32.77 62.54 369 1080 0.00 0.00 0 0
25.21 48.11 329 964 0.00 0.00 0 0
168.15 515.72 1814 9123 0.00 0.00 0 0
129.35 396.71 1619 8145 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.67 0.67 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
160.96 800.06 1340 5810 0.00 0.00 0 0
135.25 672.32 957 4150 0.00 0.00 0 0
2878.37 12839.20 103976 427682 0.00 0.00 0 0
2214.13 9876.31 84533 347709 0.00 0.00 0 0
3329.04 13872.71 158925 677518 0.00 0.00 0 0
2377.89 9909.08 130267 555343 0.00 0.00 0 0
6207.41 26711.91 158925 677518 0.00 0.00 0 0
4592.02 19785.39 130267 555343 0.00 0.00 0 0
113.70 337.34 1156 5733 15.79 126.94 40 301
84.22 249.88 903 4479 13.05 104.91 35 262
8.06 30.20 85 505 0.00 0.00 0 0
7.01 26.26 76 451 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 3.05 0 21 0.00 0.00 0 0
48.31 99.03 438 1343 0.00 0.00 0 0
39.92 81.84 342 1049 0.00 7.78 0 0
170.07 466.57 1679 7581 15.79 126.94 40 301
131.15 361.03 1321 6000 13.05 112.69 35 262
210.17 1884.24 8717 25343 769.83 2080.18 250640 1245368
164.19 1472.06 7087 20604 699.84 1891.07 15111 337422
3414.32 7678.70 47755 131118 -3063.91 25893.44 1206779 15134227 546883 15712621
1951.04 4387.83 31837 87412 3584.55 9546.47 1229851 14114646 491012 15528870
61.79 168.25 1223 2178 0.00 0.00 0 0 6993 12618
51.49 140.21 902 2482 0.00 0.00 0 109 6187 111746
3476.11 7846.95 48978 133296 -3063.91 25893.44 1206779 15134227 553876 15725239
2002.53 4528.05 32739 89894 3584.55 9546.47 1229851 14114755 497199 15640616
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
1237.21 8134.85 38930 211939 461.22 5174.77 1448 32674
1075.84 7073.79 34759 189231 401.93 4500.67 1073 24203
12238.33 49673.82 271413 1141237 -1816.40 33276.00 1458907 16412570 553876 15725239
irda journal August 2012
8737.21 37050.60 218341 934781 4699.37 16050.90 1246070 14476642 497199 15640616
85
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Credit Guarantee 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Previous year 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
All Other Miscellaneous 408.16 2532.93 15919.00 71530.00 59.97 795.91 225654.22 1426039.08
Previous year 348.19 1737.01 15323.00 65704.00 73.76 409.42 176993.03 1148493.92
Grand Total 3722.98 20383.78 73061 318794 889.02 6428.17 2579557.38 19855072.88
Previous year (Total) 2833.96 13955.61 62859 268954 554.89 1259.63 1481900.00 12155673.91
■
*Wherever applicable
86
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
182.41 931.54 6603.00 29037.00 0 0.00 0 0
161.54 703.09 6308.00 25105.00 0 0.00 0 0
182.41 931.54 6603 29037 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
irda journal August 2012
161.54 703.09 6308 25105 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
87
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year 84992.64 113874.68 102168 189496 41837.74 42880.58 1164537.33 2091945.32
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous
Previous year
Grand Total 80117.75 109395.22 101238 200498 -4874.89 -4479.46 1730804.85 2824141.72
Previous year (Total) 84992.64 113874.68 102168 189496 41837.74 42880.58 1164537.33 2091945.32
■
*Wherever applicable
88
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
80117.75 109395.22 101238 200498 NA NA NA NA 6040095 10381987
84992.64 113874.68 102168 189496 NA NA NA NA 6863089 10151862
80117.75 109395.22 101238 200498 NA NA NA NA 6040095 10381987
irda journal August 2012
84992.64 113874.68 102168 189496 NA NA NA NA 6863089 10151862
89
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous 61.03 352.65 0 2.00 61.03 352.65 308055.00 1781610.00
Previous year 37.16 308.48 0 2 37.16 308.48 183845.00 1337420.00
Grand Total 3454.91 17882.22 27217 121821 3454.91 17882.22 834471.43 4199485.57
Previous year (Total) 2806.25 13013.01 22320 94195 2806.25 13013.01 490611.59 2924325.90
■
*Wherever applicable
90
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
2.74 6.65 139 1190 0 0.00 0 0
7.83 25.34 555 3115 0.00 0.08 0 751
518.07 1779.53 31918 201799 0 340.00 0 77508 150056 689449
374.74 1256.20 38228 108282 0.00 80.35 0 20050 120669 524099
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3069 17669
2688 14513
518.07 1779.53 31918 201799 0.00 340.00 0 77508 153125 707118
374.74 1256.20 38228 108282 0.00 80.35 0 20050 123357 538612
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
520.81 1786.18 32057 202989 0.00 340.00 0 77508 153125 707118
irda journal August 2012
382.57 1281.54 38783 111397 0.00 80.43 0 20801 123357 538612
91
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee 8998 43838 859 3925 2528 6433 337617 2466897
Previous year 6470 37405 1069 4923 -548 3577 549659 1746681
All Other Miscellaneous
Previous year
Grand Total 8998.16 43838.11 859 3925 2527.74 6432.64 337616.78 2466897.13
Previous year (Total) 6470.42 37405.47 1069 4923 -547.67 3576.93 549659.02 1746681.20
■
*Wherever applicable
92
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
irda journal August 2012
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
93
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous
Previous year
Grand Total 1351.44 6365.91 12404 55326 1349.54 6334.43 42588.55 180021.35
Previous year (Total) 1043.22 3100.78 4910 22045 1036.47 2933.17 85289.00 167403.10
■
*Wherever applicable
94
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.09 0.18 10 21 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
11.68 61.42 169 631 0 11.53 0 32 23407 149577
7.52 23.45 91 258 1.76 5.25 1882 2384 21459 56162
11.68 61.42 169 631 0.00 11.53 0 32 23407 149577
7.52 23.45 91 258 1.76 5.25 1882 2384 21459 56162
11.77 61.60 179 652 0.00 11.53 0 32 23407 149577
irda journal August 2012
7.52 23.45 91 258 1.76 5.25 1882 2384 21459 56162
95
■
non-life insurance
Name of the Insurer: Star Health and Allied Insurance Company Limited
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 -33.35 -190.41 0 0.00
Previous year 33.35 190.41 11948 68301.00 -10.85 -5.19 119480 683010.00
Grand Total 6477.62 31084.08 0 0 3403.28 -23195.97 0 5346866.63
Previous year (Total) 3074.34 54280.05 125269 0 420.54 -1235.41 995581.31 28026917.07
■
*Wherever applicable
96
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
93.45 330.91 5329 29727.00 11.38 57.04 3971 17366.00
138.36 332.33 5133 21932.00 10.61 120.88 4773 49238.00
2482.53 12421.93 35691 153701.00 1200.01 7554.28 24717 957303.00 123818 1379689.00
871.46 30289.25 33248 137747.00 235.67 16598.99 23333 15827539.00 120371 52768303.00
20.40 161.32 589 4284.00 34.50 214.20 1178 7991.00 3656 23400.00
23.98 114.13 695 3827.00 38.03 303.89 1401 10479.00 3908 22728.00
2502.93 12583.25 36280 157985 1234.51 7768.48 25895 965294 127474 1403089
895.44 30403.38 33943 141574 273.70 16902.88 24734 15838018 124279 52791031
0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0
2596.38 12914.16 41609 187712 1245.89 7825.52 29866 982660 127474 1403089
irda journal August 2012
1033.80 30735.71 39076 163506 284.31 17023.76 29507 15887256 124279 52791031
97
■
non-life insurance
BUSINESS FIGURES:
Previous year
Credit Guarantee
Previous year
All Other Miscellaneous
Previous year
Grand Total 174.52 910.65 1187 1261 174.52 910.65 9651.00 24372.00
Previous year (Total) 0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
■
*Wherever applicable
98
•
..T --------------------
(Premium in ` Lakhs)
FOR AND UP TO THE MONTH OF AUGUST, 2012
Amount of Premium No. of Policies Amount of Premium No. of Lives covered No. of
u/w in Rural Areas in Rural Areas u/w in Social Sector in Social Sector Lives covered *
For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to For the Up to
month the month month the month month the month month the month month the month
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6572 27675
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 6572 27675
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 6572 27675
irda journal August 2012
0.00 0.00 0 0 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 0
99
■
Is your insurance company
listening to you?
Access IGMS* at
www.igms.irda.gov.in
www.irda.gov.in
events
view point
II
These proposed policy measures are intended to reduce moral hazard and the negative
externalities stemming from the potential disorderly failure posed by a global systemically
important insurer (G-SII).
Mr. Peter Braumüller
Chair of the IAIS Executive Committee.
As we embrace Asia’s growth, we must also strengthen our capabilities to deal with
increasingly large and complex risks, such as the impact of the Euro crisis, ageing populations
and natural catastrophes.
Mr Heng Swee Keat
Minister for Education, Government of Singapore.
The financial crisis has emphasised the close links between the health and behaviour of banks
and the state of the economy. We are remembering a very uncomfortable lesson from history
that should not have been forgotten. But, forgotten it was.
Mr. Andrew Bailey
Managing Director, Prudential Business Unit, FSA, UK.
The catastrophe events in Australia and New Zealand in 2011 led to some reinsurers reducing
or restructuring the cover they were willing to provide in the region, or requiring significant
price increases for some types of cover.
Mr. Ian Laughlin
Member, Australian Prudential Regulation Authority.
We aim to adapt such standards appropriately to take account of the nature of business
conducted in Bermuda and the characteristics of this market to ensure our frameworks remain
practical as well as equivalent.
Mr. Jeremy Cox
CEO, Bermuda Monetary Authority.
The insurance industry cannot merely look at better return of money. Going forward, the focus
of insurance will move towards protection and annuity provision.
Mr. J. Hari Narayan
Chairman, Insurance Regulatory & Development Authority (India).
II
If undelivered please return to:
IRDA, Parishram Bhavan, 3rd Floor, Basheer Bagh, Hyderabad - 500 004. Ph: +91-40-23381100