Case 1 A TAX PROGRAM:

Review Questions: (Answer)

Since we are talking about the customers here which are our utmost
concern, I believe this should be resolved. All I see here is the issue of negligence,
since one (provider) complied to resonate but later realized the bug being
presented. Is it safe to say that it’s just left unchecked and being forgotten where
we know we cannot help to solve software bugs since these issues raised are
consequently “inevitable” as a provider yes you are concerned but not for a
“third-party loss” especially if it’s not being corrected due to overtime
justification. Hence, you must still provide patch of solution to resolve the issue by
following legal rules derived.

Case 2:

Review Questions: (Answer)

Being in a pool and crossroad of choices raised in a single step is not easy.
As a manufacturer, a seller and a service provider I believe we aim to provide
good quality and ineffable goods (service) through our customers. Since you
provide and you sold, it is your concern if a discrepancy ignites. The customers
varies him to appeal for reconsideration since he experienced problems in availing
the service or the said system program. This issue involves “product and strict
liability” since the defendant held reliable of the conflict being raised. It’s your
program that caused the perplexities and if its evidently legitimate, then its really
a concern of “product liability” then you also found faulty of the concerned that’s
why you are also “strictly liable”.