Case Study 1: The Absence of Cybercrime Laws

Review Questions: (Answer)

1. It diminishes the right to data privacy. Meaning you have no control over the
suspicious schemes online. You cannot retrieve any data, even caused your
devices to get harmed and of course your reputation being placed at stake.
Through that you needed to still convince anyone wherein you are forced to
defend yourself against a certain anomaly.

2. As per research, Tajikistan has the least cyber-security concerning cyber cases
derived. Considering that this century merely focuses now on technology and
almost all countries attached to it. Lets focus on the weakest claim cyber=defense
basing on demographical cyber-security setting.

Case Study 2: Freedom of Expression and Cybercrime Law

Review Questions: (Answer)

1. The freedom of Speech, since the action of the offender constraints to the
Section 112 where it pertains to the act insult or defamation to the royal family. It
weakens the prerogative of someone (Jatupat) to express what he is willing to
impose. Expression does merely connects with a pro and a con affiliations it does
depend especially if it’s conflicting with the law.

2. It’s not well reciprocated, for my audacious opinion. Offense should be graded
or punished based on the level of cruelty and harm it caused especially physical or
emotional damage. I believe this law of the said country (Thailand) should be
amended. The aim of the law should be for justice and fairness and not for
personal distress. Since we all know Thailand is considered a “constitutional
monarchy”. You just not abide the law but rather act and utilize it for good.