Collaboration overload compares to utilitarianism in that collaboration is done for the benefit of the organization rather than individuals. It also relates to liberties and rights by allowing employees to voice opinions. While collaboration overload uses more resources and slows decisions, organizations view employee collaboration as generally beneficial.
Original Description:
Original Title
Collaboration overload compares to utilitarianism because the whole reason why
Collaboration overload compares to utilitarianism in that collaboration is done for the benefit of the organization rather than individuals. It also relates to liberties and rights by allowing employees to voice opinions. While collaboration overload uses more resources and slows decisions, organizations view employee collaboration as generally beneficial.
Collaboration overload compares to utilitarianism in that collaboration is done for the benefit of the organization rather than individuals. It also relates to liberties and rights by allowing employees to voice opinions. While collaboration overload uses more resources and slows decisions, organizations view employee collaboration as generally beneficial.
Collaboration overload compares to utilitarianism because the whole
reason why “collaboration overload” exists is because the collaboration is
happening for the usefulness and benefit of the organization as a whole. Utilitarianism is the idea that actions should be taken for the betterment of the company, not just the one person. Also, collaboration is related to liberties/rights because it gives everyone the chance to voice their concerns and opinions, and their team can give feedback/suggestions to improve the idea. Collaboration overload compares to the three ethical decision criteria because although it is mainly done for the betterment of the organization, it also gives each employee that is involved to feel like what they must “add on” will matter in the final decision. It is probably not best for an organization to have an overload, since it uses a lot of resources and slows down the decision-making process, but organizations seem to think that employees collaborating is still a good idea (and an efficient one at that).
Collaboration overload can be considered as an unbalanced combination of the
three criteria since the whole “collaboration overload” concept is existed because of the collaboration, which is similar to utilitarianism - the idea that actions should be taken for the betterment of the organization as a whole, not just the one person. Also, collaboration is related to liberties/rights because it gives everyone the chance to voice their concerns and opinions, and their team can give feedback/suggestions to improve the idea. In this chapter, it’s stated that nearly 20 to 35 percent of those collaborations that actually add value come from only 3 to 5 percent of the employees. As more individuals need their assistance, employees' workloads have increased. Justice states ethical choices are those that are ought to make in accordance with moral rules, standards, principles, laws, or other legal requirements. Being anti-collaboration could be against social norms in workplaces where it is becoming a practice. It is probably not best for an organization to have an overload, since it uses a lot of resources and slows down the decision-making process, but organizations seem to think that employees collaborating is still a good idea (and an efficient one at that).