[Ac Ne. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLANANT ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pup Supre Cote CHANROBLES ‘VIRTUAL LAW LIBRARY NO-DEPOSIT BONUS Start your Trading Journey CHANRODLES i — ‘oun may Ta LABOR CODE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Anotted TT Ye Si brn ao ernst = Ti Reverso tere os mayb coibw 20 Onan gra IS4== CHANROBLES PROFESSIONAL REVIEW ONLINE a CHANROBLES ONLINE BAR REVIEW — crannobloe ci eS aa) os mayb coibw 20 Onan gra IS4 LIAS. SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pup Suprne Cost Dre INELITA 5. SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT v. ATTY. FELINO R. QUIAMBAO, RESPONDENT. [AC Ro. 12401 NELITA . SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, . ATT. FELINO RQUIAMBO, RESPONDENT, Republic of te Phakippines supredie COURT Alowila ‘A. No. 12401, March 12, 2018 NELITA S, SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, v: AY: FELINO R, QUIAMBAO, RESPONDENT. ‘GeSMUNDO, 2: ‘Thar le 9 Complin-Atidovt! fled by Nelts S. Salazar (complainant) against Ay. Feline & ‘Quamboo® befor the Integrates Sor of the Pippin (IM) Commission on Bar Okcntne (Commsson for alain ofthe Layers Oath and his profesional uty 262 ratary publ According to complainant, sometime in 2005, she entered inte contract fsleinveling two (2) parcels of lor losted at Sto Ulng Tig, Bray. Mebuhay, Carmona, Cavite, Te sbjet lcs ‘wore covered by Transfer Cerfiate of Tile (TET) CLOA Tle No. 436, previously owned by Lorenzo Dae (Die); ard TET CLOA Tie Wo. previously owned by Barings Unsantos, represented By his atarney infact, Dee Usantos (Urns) “Te ale ofthe subject ance as winesed and atisted by respondent, ho represent himlt Deploy machine learning BernsCHANROBLES (CIN LICENSURE EXAMINATION Tata ONLINE CT RO EN eS aa) ‘Ac. Ne. 12401-NELITAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cost Oren te complainant. Thus, hey entrusted the owners duplicate copies of Ue two (2) les, tax (on tty 6 an 13,2006, complainant personally gave respondent the amount of P170,00.00 as payrant for the procssing, Laster o es, and ater related fees, incling the 2rotessional feat of eapondent. The payments ware evidenced by Receipt sled by reepondent. According to complainant, on the same day 2 July 6, 2006, Ursantos also gave respandent the mount of 271,748.35 for payment of te captal gains tax of te properties 50 tha hese can be vansteres under complainant's name _xterelgt (8) years, compsinnt hae nat received any document processed by respondent From the ume that te orginal Gocumets and payments were tendered to ressondet, he ter 3a not sertored any legal service or complainant. Comatainantatampted to fofow-up the transfer of her lands but respondent was always out of rear. She went to respondent's ofice ever times bt lefts were fe. On ly 7, 2014, ‘omplomans sent a Osmand Let: to respondent remincing Nm of hi eal underatng Sut ag unneeded Desperate and dlsappsinted with respondent, complainant went to the RegSry of Deeds of ‘Cavite to determine whether the tle of the subse: properties were already transfered to her ame. To her earay, combinant decoveed tt the subject properties were stl regtered en he previous owners. © ‘on Jy 22, 2014, comahinant sent responcent » Fal Demand (ener s9 sumender al the acuments and ren tha payments made. However, pte of several opparncies gen to respondent, ne si led to comaly. On Seater 1, 2014, complainant also sought assistance from the IP of Imus, Cavite verte conduct of responce. time; and inexcusable negligence to register the sels over pea of eight (6) years without Deploy machine learning Dec earesd os mayb coibw 20 Onan gra IS4tevvaza 82a [Ac Ne. 12401-NELITAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAD, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pup Spr Cot Dre © aranisian: Only comalinant attended the sad conference apd fled he poston paper aleping mW Celerant Prey ka er ar that responcent violated the Lawyers Oath, and Canons 16, 17, and 18 of the Code of Professional Response (Code) Report and Recommendation I is Report and Recormendaton® cated Marcy 24, 2017, me respondent Inéeaeraceved several payments from complainant forthe transfer af the subject properties but the former fied: comely with his terms of tga series engagement, vag is sworn utes a5 a lanyer, I also founé that complairar: sent respondent several demand eters ut tese were unheeded: complainant even sought assistance from the I8P of Imus, “cave and the Punong Baranoay of Carmana, Cavite to reach au to Fespencen, Du 9 no A, ‘The 1B Commision fours thet these ets vated Canons 16, 17, and 18 of the Code ard recomended tat respondent be suspended frm the practice of aw fo three (3) year 3° Commision foune that In is Resohon® dated May 3, 2018, the 18° Board oF Governors (Board) adopted with raeation she penalty recommended against respondent of suspension from the practice of iw for 2 period of (3) yes return the amount of P170,00.00 te complainant ane 9 ay 3 Fie 0,000.0 for abeying the order of te BP Commission. The-court's Ruling ‘The Cour aco he finaings ofthe BP Commision andthe recommendations of re 1? Boa Adherence to ol standards of mental fess, mantanance ofthe highest degre of moray, fant comoiance wen ene rules of the legal profession, and regular payment of memeersh fe0sto ta 1B ar te contions required for remaining member af gece standing of the Dar {and for eriaying the prmtege to pracece Bw, Beyond question, any breac oy 2 lawyer of any of ‘these conations makas him wnworthy of she test and condidenee which the cours and cents rust repaea in him, and renders him unft to contmue in the exercise of Me profesional Prilge. Bot acbarment ane ruspensiondemansvblyoperaconalize ti inten to protec he ‘courts and the publ rom members ofthe Bar who have Became unt ana unworthy to be part ‘ofthe esteemed and noble profession)? EO CLT models in one-click os cero Z0Onarnenn she i=t64tevvaza 82a ‘Ac. No. 12401-NELITAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Ppa Supre Cost Deen reasonable mind might eczept 82 Cour extene: Just t july @ concen 7? lores w Lat," the [Ine evidentiary tvesole of substantl eviance- a oppos to prapondarance ot feedance ~ 18 mare in Keeping with the prmordal purese of and essential corsideatons attending {to these types] of cases. AS case aw elucidates, * [elscotnary proceedings against lawyers are sui gerers. Nether purely cv nor purty criminal, they do not involve 2 Wal ofan acon or & Sut, but is rather an Investgation byte Court nt the conduct of one of offices. Nat lng Intended 3 Inflet punwmert, i in no senaa a crminal proseition, Accaringly, mara Ie » nother 9 plant nor a prosecutor tran. It ay be inated by the Cour: mts proprio. Pate iteest is ts primary objective, and the real question for ‘etermination fe whetner 6° net the atrney ssi 8 ft person to be stowed &ne priileges 8 such. Hence, nthe exer of ts lcpinary ower, the Court merely tvth te end ln view of preserving the purty ofthe lege profestion and the proper ar Honest administration of use by purging the profession of members who by ete misconduct have proved themes longer warthy tebe entrusted with the les and responsibities pertaining to the ofce of an atlomey. tn such posture, “The Lanrer's Oath requies evry lawyer to “delay na man for maney or male” and to act “accoaing tthe best of [hs oF her now eege and sre, wih al good ety 2s wal to the cours to (his oer] eens“! A lanyar is duy-bound to serve his cent with ‘eompetenc, ard a alend to is cnts cause with egerce, care and devotion, Ts i because 2 lawyer ones faety to Ns dent's cause and must alvays be minal of the lust and ‘Canon 16, Rules 16.03, 16.02, ond 16.03 of he Code requie Chat ayer mus ly acount a ‘the moneys and popes of islet, to wi {ANON 16 A lawyer st98 holdin fut all moneys and prepares of his len hat ray come ness profession. v Rule 16.03 - Ayer eral account for all meray or property calc or aces for aWs Deploy machine learning el COs d os cero Z0Onarnenn she i=t64KLIN. SAAZAR, COMPLAINANT v ATTY FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pippin Supre Cot Oren Rule 16.03 - A lawyer shal deve the funds ane property of his lent when due oF pon demand. However, ne shal have 2 len over the fds and may apay so much thereof as may be necessary to Sat his lawful fas and disbursements, ong rice promptly thereat to hs ln, He shal aso nave a len to te same extent fon all jucaments and executions ne hes secure for Mis cont a provided ori the Rules of Cours Faaty, eomgetesce end digerce when dealing wih iso er cet, i [CANON 18 A wyer shall serve hi lent wth competnce and agence negligence connection tart sal render nn Hable Respondent vested the Lawyers Oath andthe Code processing, tarfer of tiles, and other related fet, incluing hie proestona fees fr the suboc propels. Evident, comalinet gave "spondent such amount to facts the tester of es of the subject properties under her name. Compliant Dee and Ursentos even gave respondent the owners dupleate copies of the TCT of the two (2) subject properties, tx ‘ecaraton, and Gly sin deeds of abscue sale forte vanstr of he sid properties, ‘Soe payments were tendered by complainant on 2uy 6 ang 13, 2006 unl fing her instant Complaint, or afer pared of eat (8) yess, respondent was remiss In his obligation of ‘ronsarng the ties of te subject properties to comslaiant. 1 was net even conned whether respondent actualy notarized the ceeds of absolute sale forthe sublet properties Ccomsainant wen to cesponcent' oftce several mest fllw up the transac he ts ot the attr as avaysunave abe aWs Deploy machine learning pale os mayb coibw 20 Onan gra IS4PIMENTEL, ERROL 8. COMAEAY, JR, SANDOVAL, VICTORIA 8. LOANZON, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIR, HOW. EMERSON 8. AQUENDE, AND U MICHAEL Z. UNTALAN, JONATHAN os cero Z0Onarnenn she i=t64 KLIN. SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pippin Spr Cast Deen Tespeaively, were Seo respondent requing he rel ofthe oil document, as well 2s the amount ofP170,090.00, but tase were unheeded. Complainant even sovgt the assistance ‘of me IBP of Imus, Cave, where respondent 1S 2 member and te OMe of the Puneng Barangay of the Mucipatty of Carmona, Cave, but on aval Respondent nas oven an epporunty to controvert the allegations against him, However, he reer fies mis answer nor aterced he mancatorycorference ofthe 18P Commission. Ver, respondent's acts ané omissions vated the Lawyer's Oath because he delyoe te caso of his ‘er ora pana of eae (8) years without any usable reason. Ne ago votes Canon 16, Rules 26.01, 16.02, na 16.03 ofthe Code because he rece 8 tranfer of the subect rogdrties. However, he failed to comely with bis obligation, Further, he se-keep the nard-eamed money of ia chet. because he fled to observe is duty to hie cnt, Complaban, Dia, and Ureatos engaged the subject properses to complainant. They even entrusted the important relevant documents to respondent. However, ater 2 tng pared ef tine, respondent raed to comply with ms duty because te tes were stil under the name ofthe previous owners. When complainant sought ‘the return of tre important cscuments and the payments tendered, respondent simoW lgnered rer pleas. these acs ane omissions sraw respondent's wanton Alsegard and inference ts mis ‘hort’ cnue. Proper penalty “The Cour finds tat eamplaiantestablshes with substantial evidence that respondent: (2) was engoped by compliant, Dar and Unsantos t facta the transfer ofthe ies of the suet properties to comalinant, which obliation, eer eight year, respondent stl aed to comply wen: (2) respondent reeived the amount of P170,00,00 fram eampasant forthe processing, raster of te, ana other related fees, including his profesional fees, but he reneged on his ‘blgaton and filed to retue the same to complainant, and (3) he recaved the ownersPETITIONERS-INTERVENORS. [6.8 No, 242954]-RANCIS JOSE LEAN L. LRBAYATA, GRETCHEN M. VASQUEZ Paz, SHEMAR KC QUENIAHAN, AL JAY 1. MEI0S, ROCELIYN L. DAO, EMERSON B.«AQUENDE, KLIN. SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pippin Spr Cast Deen In Unted Coconut Planters Bank v ty. Noel? the Inner therein lees Canons 7, Rule 18.02 of the Cede because he failed to fle several pleadings anda mation fr his cnt, resulin to an adverse judgment for eet. By onsmiting inexcusadle negligence, the Curt suspended hm for Ure (3) years from the pace e In Ramin, otal Atty. Oo, the anyer vilated Canons 17,18, an Rules 18.03, ana raconsgeration bt he did not les maton, He eleo fled to raulrly upcate his cts on the status of ne ease, patalary on the aaversa esl, thereby leaving sham nthe dark oa the procescings tat wee gradual turing agaist thei terest, The Cour suspended the lmyer ‘therefor two (2) years fom the practice ow Silat, tener v. Aly. Gagate,# tne lawyer violated Canons 17,18, 29, ane Ruks 18.03, ‘and 19.01 of he Code necause he abandones his clants dung the pendency af the grave ‘eoerion «B56 aglns them even though ne recaved P150,000,0 as ns aceatance fe. For commiting rss nealgence, ere Court suspendod the layer therein fr pared of trae (3) years rom the practice of am, ‘erly, aling to comply with nis ablgatons nd his ‘are te return the money ane impertant ocaments of hs clan, responcent 1s mated the peraly of suspension of three (3) years from ‘the practice of law with stern warning tat repetion of sia wlation wil te dealt with Further, respondent & oder to return the amount of P370,000,0 to compinart, which he receved in hs profesional capac for tansfer a he tle, 8 well the relevant documents ‘en to him By his cent. Ospthary proceeiings revo atound the determination of the respondent-ayer' adminisatveIatilty, whieh must include ase ininsizalyUnked to his professonal engagement? Respondent must raturs the sforesld ereut to complainant with Interest a the faa rte of ele percent (12%) per annum rom tele respactive dle of receipt unt aune 3, 2013, ands perent (68) per annum Fam uly 1, 20:3 unt ul psymest.2? aWs Deploy machine learning pale os cero Z0Onarnenn she i=t64tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pup Supre Cost Dre MALINAO, PETITIONER, + GA No, 236015 - RAQUILALE Tote, Respondent was even given a pared of fiteea (15) days © es pastion paper but he i not comply. Respondents fare wo folow the orders of the 18° wihoutjusiable reason anes hs dsresoet of ust autories 22 1 must ne underscored that respondent owed Ite Himself and to te entre Lega Ptesion of the Patppines to exor due respect toards the IBP a5 the rational exganizaon of al the rmemeers of te Left Profession, wis unexolaines dsegard ofthe orders Sued to im by the {RP to answer commant and to appear in the administrative Investigation ot is misconduct revealed nis respons as wel ass asespec for the IBP ants acceecngs. He thereby ‘exposed a characte flaw that should not trish te nobly ofthe Legal Pofssen. He shoul ways Bern mind tat hs beng a lawyer cemanded that he conduct imset a » person of te Ighest mara and prfessonal nag and prob in his dsling wth others. He sno never forge m3 his duty to serve his hens wth unwavering leyy and elgence cares wth i the _orespendng respnsiitis towards the Court, t the Bar, ant the publ in geneal23 For mis esbedione of the orders of the ISP Commission, respondent mut pay» fre of 10,000.00. WHEREFORE, ry. Feline R. Quambse is GUILTY of violsing Corsne 16,17, 18, and Ruler 16.0, 16.02, 16.02, and 18.03 of the Code of Profesional Responbilty andthe Lawyers Oath Ne i hereby SUSPENDED from he practice of law for tree (3) yaar with STERN WARNING that te repetition fe smilrviton wil be dea wth even more severely He is DIRECTED to report the date of is rect of thls Deco to enable Wis Court to determine when is suspension shall ake eet, Furr, fy Feline R. Quiabao is hereby ORDERED to turn to complainant Nella S. Salazar ‘the amount ofP170,00.00, with interest of welve percent (12%) per annum reckoned fem the respecte date of receipt uni une 39,2013, ard sx percent (6%) ger annum tm WJ, 2013, Lunt fl payment, intenced as payment forthe processing, transfer f ee, and eter reat fees, incucing his professional fees, 25 wall a al relevant gal cocumets of tre subject ropartes, win nlnety (90) days rom te falty ef this Decision {iy Fel Re Quiambae Is slo horsby mated a FINE in tho amount of 0,000.00 for isooeonce to the cders of the Integrated War of the Pilonines - Commission on Bar aWs Deploy machine learning aie BE Gu ces tod os cero Z0Onarnenn she i=t64tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pup Supre Cost Dre LUwiMODIN “AMERIL Y ABDUL @ “asowmHONG®, ACCUSED: eS aa) [a copy of tis Gein be Fished to the Oe af he Bar Conant abe ntered ite iy Feline R. Quambou's racers. Copies shall Hhense be funshed tothe Integrated Bar of the Bovsamin, J, Cope, Perats, Bel Casio, Paris-Bemabe, Leanen, Jardeleze, Capua, A ayes 3. Rayes, n, Nemando, Carns, ane Lazar-Jovier, J, cone Sreymesdames Pease take notice that on March 12,2019 Deco, copy sacred herewith ws rendered Dy ‘the Supreme Cour nthe abovrentles cas, te egal of which Was received by hs Offce on ay 3, 20:9 a 1:59 pi (50D) EDGAR 0. ARICHETA Chek cour Rate, pp. 2-5. 2 seo refer to a6 "Ay. Fane R. Quiambse II which appears n Complaint aida ea 28); Acknowledgment Receipt dated ul 5, 2006 (4 3 6 ane 80); exnoulecgment Receipt dates ly 13,2006 (i. at 7 and 6); Later eed ul 7, Deploy machine learning Ree Cnr tad os cero Z0Onarnenn she i=t64 1000JORGE, PETITIONER, v. ALBERTO LL ZANORA, ALEXANDER F SUERTE, COMMISSION (THRO oTIstON), CAOWVAS, PETITIONER, COURT os cero Z0Onarnenn she i=t64 KLIN. SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pippin Spr Cast Deen 9 However, 67a 6 Rata thatthe dite ote fest paynant fly 5, 2006. Si ace. seins, 7, a6 1920. "Soop w Aly. Magione, AC No. 10555, July 31,2018, canlo v. Aty. Angeles, A.C. Nos, 9999, 9900, 9902-9905, 9801 & 9902, Seplember 4,20 18; Blanes v. Aly. Latido, AC. No, 12065, August 28, 2018; Dimayuoe v- Ay. Rubio, AC. No. 665K, Jy 3, 2038; Zara, et atv Aly (quesad,Je, AC. No. 7186, Maren 13,2018, "pata. Aty, Paterno, 710 Pi. 562, 593 (2013). 1d, cing Reyes Ay. Movs, 794 PR. 360, 379-280 (2016) 1 seo Lanyers Oath 16 Sao Vs. de Boringuez Wty. Alero, Sr, 728 Phi. 5, S84 (2014), 1 A. No, 3951, June 19,2008ARZADON, JOE. ASCAKO,, MA BANDILLA, LAURA. G, AQUIRAN, NM. DAGAL, ROSALIER B. DAGONDON, 2Wstzon, Je vty Camacho, 77 Pi 1,1 (2036), 2% Seo chun v Atty. Jmenec, 801 Pl 1,12 (2016) Rojpie v. Atty, Vlanermosy, Ill, AC, No, 19262, Oster 2, 2017, 841 SCRA 292, 2. ramble tv Aly. Or, supra note 18, 3326 PVCS Ou CIT) pale os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pup Supre Cost Dre ENAIQUETA A. LORENTE, ALBERTO S. PADRIQUE, AOSARIO MELANIE. C L QUIRINO, AURORA A RADOMES, RARA, EDUARDO F. REYES, AIDA A Deploy machine learning models in one-click os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron [eR No. 210922) OEVeLoPMENT PVCS Ou CIT) aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pup Supre Cost Dre VICENTE VANAS YBALDERAMA FELINO R. QUIAMAAO, RESPONDENT. PVCS Ou CIT) pels Cc id os ceric ZO Onan phei=164 1500tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pup Supre Cost Dre aws__ Deploy machine learning peak Bars cit os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron aws__ Deploy machine learning peak Bars cit os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pup Supre Cost Dre TURLA, COMPLAINANT, v. ATTY. JOSE REVOROSA IN HIS. CAPACITY AS INSURANCE COMPANY), IRGINA PVCS Ou CIT) aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron THE PHILIPPINES, PETITIONER, FAMILARAVPAMILARAK +) PVCS Ou CIT) aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pup Supre Cost Dre JEANNE("] LO?e2, RESPONDEN FRLPINAS CORPORATION (NOW FREY INSURANCE CO, INC. PETITIONER, v BEACON EQUITIES, INC, AND aWs Deploy machine learning aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron HOENA, PETITIONER, v, PEOPLE OF Domo, ANGELITO D. TWARO AND HON. SECRETARY OCHOA, OR, BMECTNE — PRQUTO. ON aWs Deploy machine learning el COs d os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pup Supre Cost Dre aki, PETINONER, v EUNG WONT PVCS Ou CIT) aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron ASSOCIATION, INC, AND/OR + GA. No, 224466 (Formerly YOK 15574) = KAREN NUREZY VET, LyWErTes+ —NUe2 — PASINOA, WARREN NUNEZ, AND” ALDENW?** Nuez, PETITIONERS, v. NORMA aWs Deploy machine learning aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron InTERnATIONAL. (ranonis) coaPorarioWco-& KING, PVCS Ou CIT) aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pup Supre Cost Dre ‘raanssonTaTIOn (OTR, aWs Deploy machine learning aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron JOVENCITA LANES; ROLYHIN HEQUETHELMA ‘oenona; PVCS Ou CIT) aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pup Supre Cost Dre LAUREL 1 JOSE J. LEIDO, 2, (ALL Pemez, FELICISIMO R. GONZALES") (GOTH FORMER MANAGERS OF PNG crm, RAMON ESCA, EVELINA FAIARDO, PETITIONER, v SELEY CA + GA No, 197498 - cOCA-COLAS*] aWs Deploy machine learning aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron ‘sakuyeonc,” seTTIONER, + AG. No, 11984 (Fomany C80 [Formerly ¢8 1P1 No. 021758-P)) TAM, No. MI-03-1672 (Formerly As No, 02-10-27:-MTCIJOFFICE OF THE aWs Deploy machine learning aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pup Supre Cost Dre AACOIEDO, ALBERTO OAWMIEL, MA MORANOANTE(+] AND MA. NYHPHA ANT CORPORATION, AND/OR aWs Deploy machine learning aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron LABORATORIES INC. PETITIONER, v ‘TAWAHEG (RODERICK D. SUMATRA) PVCS Ou CIT) aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron (aepmesereD ey pRosecutos PROSECUTORS (SENIOR DEPUTY VILANUEVA, CITY PROSECUTOR [ANGELO CHAVEZ I, RESPONDENTS, aWs Deploy machine learning aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pup Supre Cost Dre aws__ Deploy machine learning peak Bars cit os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron AIRO, RESPONDENTS.[G.. No RAQUEL SAGUM Y-MARTINEZ + AG. No, 12113 (Formary CBD 08+ 2193) ~ LEO LWMBRE, LEDIONN aWs Deploy machine learning aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron DuAROG CARO. Y—-LEWA PVCS Ou CIT) el COs d os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron (OF NORTH AMERICA, UNKNOWN ws REYMALOI*] ESPEIO. Y_ RIZALDO, MIRANDA, MORUNG STAR HOMES AND CECILIA VARGAS (+) aWs Deploy machine learning aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT ATTY. FELNO R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT. Man 2019 Pup Supre Cost Dre (onveRy —MIRANT.—PAGBILEO CORPORATION), RESPONDENT THE PHILIFINES, PETITIONER, PVCS Ou CIT) aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron EUSTAQUIO. CARDENAS, NAMELY Fact JANE TUMLOS-quIzON, LeOcADI0 DUQUE, 8, RESPONDENT. ENRIQUEZ, MA. REBECCA SAN JOSE, WIKMEUMNARDINERO,*] JUN 1) MARY 2EAN SAN JUAN aWs Deploy machine learning aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron TERESTIA AREIOLA, TERESA +A. No, 9218 [Farmety COO Case No. 12-3467] ~ ENRICA BUCAG, DANTE ARON (DECEASED), DANILO (CeceAseD), ACCUSED; EDGAR aWs Deploy machine learning aie BE Gu ces tod os ceric ZO Onan phei=164tevvaza 82a [Ac Na. 12401-NELTAS SALAZAR, COMPLAINANT, ATTY. FELND R QUAMBAO, RESPONDENT, Man 2019 Pupp Suprne Cot Dron aWs Deploy machine learning el COs d os ceric ZO Onan phei=164