TC – GIMAC2204

GMU-CIArb (INDIA) INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ARBITRATION

COMPETITION (GIMAC) 2022

BEFORE

THE GUJARAT INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ARBITRATION CENTRE

UNDER

THE ARBITRATION RULES OF THE GIMAC

IN THE MATTER OF AN ARBITRATION

HELD IN GIFT CITY (2022)

KALINGA INTERNATIONAL COMMODITIES PVT LTD.............................................................. CLAIMANT

v.

MALACA INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING PTE LTD.................................................................... RESPONDENT 1

MALACA RESOURCES SDN BHD............................................................................................... RESPONDENT 2

MEMORANDUM ON BEHALF OF RESPONDENTS

 GMU-CIARB (INDIA) INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ARBITRATION
COMPETITION (GIMAC) 2022

[T ABLE OF C ONTENTS ] P AGE | II

 GMU-CIARB (INDIA) INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ARBITRATION
COMPETITION (GIMAC) 2022

[L IST OF A BBREVIATIONS ] P AGE | IV

 GMU-CIARB (INDIA) INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ARBITRATION
COMPETITION (GIMAC) 2022

[L IST OF A BBREVIATIONS ] P AGE | V

 GMU-CIARB (INDIA) INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ARBITRATION
COMPETITION (GIMAC) 2022

[I NDEX OF A UTHORITIES ] P AGE | IX

 GMU-CIARB (INDIA) INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ARBITRATION
COMPETITION (GIMAC) 2022

[S TATEMENT OF J URISDICTION ] P AGE | X

 GMU-CIARB (INDIA) INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ARBITRATION
COMPETITION (GIMAC) 2022

[S UMMARY OF F ACTS ] P AGE | XII

 GMU-CIARB (INDIA) INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ARBITRATION
COMPETITION (GIMAC) 2022

[I SSUES R AISED ] P AGE | XIII

 GMU-CIARB (INDIA) INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ARBITRATION
COMPETITION (GIMAC) 2022

[S UMMARY OF A RGUMENTS ] P AGE | XV

 GMU-CIARB (INDIA) INTERNATIONAL MARITIME ARBITRATION
COMPETITION (GIMAC) 2022

ARGUMENTS ADVANCED

SUBMISSIONS OF ARGUMENTS ON BEHALF OF DEFENDANT(APPELLENT)

I. THE APPELLENT, HARRY, IS ENTITLED TO RECEIVE DEFENSE UNDER SECTION 84 OF IPC

1. The appellant is entitled to receive defense of insanity under section 84 of the IPC for the
following reasons: [A] The accused was of unsound mind; [B] The accused was in the
state of unsoundness of mind at the time of the act; [C] The accused was unable to know
the nature of the act;

(A) THE ACCUSED WAS OF UNSOUND MIND

(B) THE ACCUSED WAS IN THE STATE OF UNSOUNDNESS OF MIND AT THE TIME OF THE ACT

(C)THE ACCUSED WAS UNABLE TO KNOW THE NATURE OF THE ACT

[P RAYER ] P AGE | XVI