LM.UiTM.FKE(O).

08/03

FACULTY OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2

SUBMISSION OF PROJECT TECHNICAL PAPER

STUDENT’S NAME : MUHAMMAD NURAZLI BIN MOHD DALI

STUDENT’S UiTM ID : 2016690508

COURSE CODE : EE242

PROJECT TITLE

COST MINIMISATION FOR OPTIMAL CHARGING SCHEDULING OF ELECTRIC

VEHICLE USING EVOLUTIONARY PROGRAMMING

This is to certify that the above student has submitted the project technical paper to the
project supervisor (PS).

PS’s NAME : ASSOC. PROF. IR. DR. HJH. HASMAINI MOHAMMAD

PS’s SIGNATURE :

DATE OF SUBMISSION : 8/7/2020

1) Student needs to fill in and submit this form together with the technical paper to his/her
PS for endorsement/approval.
2) Student needs to fill in the top section of Part A, B and C of LM.UiTM.FKE(O).08/04
(Fourth Amendment) forms.
3) Student needs to return this endorsed/approved form attached together with the technical
paper and LM.UiTM.FKE(O).08/04 (Second Amendment) forms to the FYP2 Coordinator.

1|Page
 LM.UiTM.FKE(O).08/04 (Fourth Amendment)
PART A: TECHNICAL PAPER EVALUATION (25 MARKS)

1. Top section of this form is to be filled by student.

2. Student must submit this form to Technical Paper Assessment Panels (TPAP) through FYP2 Coordinator for evaluation.
3. TPAP must return immediately to FYP2 Coordinator after evaluation.

FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2: EVALUATION FORM

FACULTY OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA
COURSE : POWER ENGINEERING PROJECT II CODE: EPO663
COST MINIMISATION FOR OPTIMAL CHARGING SCHEDULING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE USING
PROJECT TITLE :
EVOLUTIONARY PROGRAMMING
PROGRAMME CODE: EE242 SUBMISSION DATE: 8/7/2020

SUPERVISOR'S NAME: Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Hjh. Hasmaini Mohammad PART A:
TECHNICAL PAPER
CO-SUPERVISOR'S NAME: EVALUATION (TPE)
STUDENT’S NAME ID NO.
MUHAMMAD NURAZLI BIN MOHD DALI 2016690508

Marks Marks (M) Weighted Marks

Assessment Criteria CO PO
Allocated 0 1 2 3 4 5 Obtained (WMO)
Abstract : =(M X 2)
Only 2 Only 3
 Objective(s) Abstract is given Some elements All elements
1 4 10.00 No abstract elements elements
 Methodology but not relevant are missing clearly stated
clearly stated clearly stated
 Findings
 Conclusion
Introduction : =(M X 4)

Paragraph of the introduction should mention the

followings:-
Only 3 Only 4
 Overview of Study Only 1 element Only 2 elements All elements
4 11 20.00 No Introduction elements elements
 Literature review Problem Statements clearly stated clearly stated clearly stated
clearly stated clearly stated
 Objectives and Scope of Study

Note: Those components are not meant as the sub-

sections
Methodology : =(M X 3)

This section should include the followings:-

Only 1 Only 2 All elements
 Functions of techniques All elements not
Some elements element elements clearly stated
 Algorithm, flow charts or pseudo codes of the 1 4 15.00 No methodology clearly stated
are missing clearly stated clearly stated and
programming codes or and explained
and explained and explained explained
 Hardware design or block diagram
 Operation methods towards achieving the
project outcomes

2|Page
 Results and Discussions : All/ most =(M X 4)
All/ few results Few results
results All results
validate some of validate some
This section should:- validate some validate all of
Results do not the project’s of the
 Exhibit the significant results based on the No Results and meet the objectives with project’s
of the the project’s
project ‘s objectives 1 4 20.00 project’s objectives
Discussions project’s inaccurate or objectives
 Discus and analyze the results of the project objectives wrong with correct
objectives with correct
with correct discussion
discussion and discussion
discussion and analysis
analysis and analysis
and analysis
Conclusion : =(M X 2)
Only All elements
No Conclusion
recommendation Only conclusion All elements fulfilled but All elements
 Students should be able to conclude the and
1 4 10.00 of future work fulfilled but not fulfilled but not only fulfilled and
findings in addressing all objectives of the recommendation
fulfilled but not clearly stated clearly stated conclusion clearly stated
project of future work
clearly stated clearly stated
 Recommendation for future work
Structure and quality of writing: =(M X 3)

 Technical paper is well structured.

 Sentences are complete with minimum Only 1 element
Only 2 Only 3 Only 4
All elements
grammatical errors. 3 8 15.00 Wrong format elements elements elements
fulfilled fulfilled
 Coherence (ideas flow smoothly from fulfilled fulfilled fulfilled
paragraph to paragraph)
 Written according to format
 Well referenced
Originality: 12% < 6% < =(M X 2)
Similarity index 24% < Similarity 18% < Similarity Similarity
3 8 10.00 Similarity Similarity
more than 30% index  30% index  24% index  6%
 Turnitin percentage index  18% index  12%

Max Marks 100.00 Total Evaluated Marks (TEM)

Total WMO.TPE (25%) i.e TEM x 0.25

3|Page
PART B: POSTER PRESENTATION (15 MARKS)

1. Top section of this form is to be filled by student.

2. Student must submit this form to Technical Paper Assessment Panels (TPAP) through FYP2 Coordinator for evaluation.
3. TPAP must return immediately to FYP2 Coordinator after evaluation.

FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2: EVALUATION FORM

FACULTY OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

COURSE : POWER ENGINEERING PROJECT II CODE: EPO663

COST MINIMISATION FOR OPTIMAL CHARGING SCHEDULING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE USING
PROJECT TITLE : EVOLUTIONARY PROGRAMMING

PROGRAMME CODE: EE242 SUBMISSION DATE: 8/7/2020

PART B:
SUPERVISOR'S NAME: Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Hjh. Hasmaini Mohammad TECHNICAL PAPER
PRESENTATION
CO-SUPERVISOR'S NAME: (TPP)
STUDENT’S NAME ID NO.

MUHAMMAD NURAZLI BIN MOHD DALI 2016690508

Assessment Marks Marks (M) Weighted Marks

CO PO
Criteria Allocated 0 1 2 3 4 5 Obtained (WMO)
Pictures, Very few of the Few of the Most of the All pictures, =(M X 3)
All pictures, graphics pictures, graphics graphics and text
graphics and pictures, graphics pictures, graphics
Picture / Graphics 2 9 15.00 and texts are not clear
texts are not and text are clear and text are clear and text are clear are clear and
or relevant
available and relevant and relevant and relevant relevant
Able to answer =(M X 7)
Able to answer Able to answer most
Unable to Unable to answer all very few Able to answer all
few questions with of the questions with
answer all questions with questions with questions with
acceptable acceptable
questions with acceptable acceptable acceptable
Shows deeper explanation explanation
acceptable explanation explanation explanation.
understanding of the
2 9 35.00 explanation
issue and draws Conclusions are Able to draw
Conclusions are less Conclusions are Able to draw good
conclusions less significant/ acceptable
Unable to draw significant/ unable to less significant/ conclusions based
unable to draw 4conclusion based
any conclusion draw any acceptable unable to draw on the project’s
any acceptable on the project’s
conclusion any acceptable objectives
conclusions objectives
conclusion
Excellent integration =(M X 7)
Integrates spoken Good integration of
Spoken and visual Attempts to integrate of spoken and visual
and visual spoken and visual
presentation is difficult spoken and visual presentation.
No integration presentation well. presentation.
to follow and presentation.
Presentation and between spoken
2 9 35.00 understand. Very confident and
delivery and visual Delivery includes Confident and
Delivery features compelling delivery
presentation. some eye contact capable delivery
No eye contact and little eye contact and features frequent
and reasonable feature eye contact
very difficult to hear / or use of diction. eye contact and
diction and clear diction
good diction.

4|Page
 =(M X 3)
The impact of this The project The project mostly The impact of this
The project
Not significant research is not demonstrates some research is very
Creativity and Impact 2 9 15.00 demonstrates demonstrates
and no creativity significant but offers creativity and significant and can
creativity and creativity and
creativity inventiveness be utilized for
inventiveness. inventiveness.
commercialization.

Max Marks 100.00 Total Evaluated Marks (TEM)

Total WMO.TPE (15%) i.e TEM x 0.15

5|Page
PART C: RECOMMENDATION BY PANEL
1. Top section of this form is to be filled by student.
2. Student must submit this form to Technical Paper Assessment Panels (TPAP) through FYP2 Coordinator for evaluation.
3. TPAP must return immediately to FYP2 Coordinator after evaluation.

FINAL YEAR PROJECT 2: EVALUATION FORM

FACULTY OF ELECTRICAL ENGINEERING
UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA

COURSE : POWER ENGINEERING PROJECT II CODE: EPO663

PROJECT TITLE : COST MINIMISATION FOR OPTIMAL CHARGING SCHEDULING OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE USING
EVOLUTIONARY PROGRAMMING
PROGRAMME CODE: EE242 SUBMISSION DATE: 8/7/2020

SUPERVISOR'S NAME: Assoc. Prof. Ir. Dr. Hjh. Hasmaini Mohammad PART C:
RECOMMENDATION
CO-SUPERVISOR'S NAME: BY PANEL

STUDENT’S NAME ID NO.

MUHAMMAD NURAZLI BIN MOHD DALI 2016690508

To be filled up by TPAP after the poster presentation. Please return this form immediately to FYP2 Coordinator.

1. Accepted

2. Accepted with minor additional work. Final report should be submitted with the following recommended additional work:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

3. Accepted with major additional work. Final report should be submitted with the following recommended additional work:

……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………

_____________ _____________ _____________

TPAP1 Signature TPAP2 Signature TPAP3 Signature
Name: Name: Name:

6|Page