Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EN BANC
Gentlemen:
Quoted hereunder, for your information, is a resolution of this Court dated FEB 5 2002.
G.R. No. 130240(Jose de Venecia, Jr., in his capacity as Speaker of the House of
Representatives; Roberto P. Nazareno, in his capacity as Secretary-General of the House of
Representatives; Jose Ma. Antonio B. Tuaño, Cashier, House of Representatives; Antonio M.
Chan, Chief, Property Division, House of Representatives, petitioners, vs. The Honorable
Sandiganbayan (First Division), respondent.)
The principal issue in this petitioner for certiorari[1] is whether of not the Sandiganbayan may
cralaw
cite in contempt of court the Speaker of the House of Representatives for refusing to
implement the preventive suspension order it issued in a criminal case against a member of
the House.
(1) the Order dated August 18, 1997 of the Sandiganbayan (First Division),[2] directing
cralaw
(2) the Resolution dated August 29, 1997,[3] also of the Sandiganbayan, declaring Speaker de
cralaw
Venecia in contempt of court for refusing to implement the preventive suspension order.
On March 12, 1993, an Information (docketed as Criminal Case No. 18857) was filed
with the Sandiganbayan (First Division) against then Congressman Ceferino S.
Paredes, Jr., of Agusan del Sur for violation of Section 3 (e) of Republic Act No. 3019
(The Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act, as amended).
After the accused pleaded not guilty, the prosecution filed a "Motion To Suspend The
Accused Pendente Lite."
In its Resolution dated June 6, 1997, the Sandiganbayan granted the motion and
ordered the Speaker to suspend the accused.But the Speaker did not comply.Thus, on
August 12, 1997, the Sandiganbayan issued a Resolution requiring him to appear before it, on
August 18, 1997 at 8:00 o'clock in the morning, to show cause why he should not be held in
contempt of court.
Unrelenting, the Speaker filed, through counsel, a motion for reconsideration, invoking the
rule on separation of powers and claiming that he can only act as may be dictated by
the House as a body pursuant to House Resolution No. 116 adopted on August 13, 1997.
On August 29, 1997, the Sandiganbayan rendered the now assailed Resolution[4] declaring
cralaw
Speaker Jose C. de Venecia, Jr. in contempt of court and ordering him to pay a fine of
P10,000.00 within 10 days from notice.
The issue before us had long been settled by this Court in Ceferino S. Paredes, Jr. v.
Sandiganbayan in G.R. No. 118354 (August 8, 1995).We ruled that the suspension provided
for in the Anti-Graft law is mandatory and is of different nature and purpose.It is imposed by
the court, not as a penalty, but as a precautionary measure resorted to upon the filing of a
valid Information.Its purpose is to prevent the accused public officer from frustrating his
prosecution by influencing witnesses or tampering with documentary evidence and from
committing further acts of malfeasance while in office.It is thus an incident to the criminal
proceedings before the court.On the other hand, the suspension or expulsion contemplated in
the Constitution is a House-imposed sanction against its members.It is, therefore,
a penalty for disorderly behavior to enforce discipline, maintain order in its
proceedings, or vindicate its honor and integrity.
We note that the term of then Congressman Ceferino Paredes, Jr. expired on June 30,
1988.This rendered moot and academic the instant case.
LUZVIMINDA D. PUNO
Clerk of Court
(Sgd.) MA. LUISA D. VILLARAMA
Asst. Clerk of Court
Endnotes:
[1]
cralaw Under rule 65 of the Revised Rules of Court.
Chico-Nazario and Sabino R. de Leon, Jr. (a special member, now a member of the Supreme
Court).
[4]
cralaw Annex "B," ibid., pp. 48-67.