THE UNITED STATES , complainant-appellee, vs. INOCENCIO
ANCHETA, defendant-appellant.
Roberto Moreno, for appellant.
Solicitor-General Araneta, for appellee.
SYLLABUS
1.CRIMINAL LAW; HOMICIDE; PARTIAL EXEMPTION.— Where the
uncontradicted testimony of the defendant shows that the killing was provoked by an assault with a weapon in the hands of the deceased, the former is not exempt from responsibility if he has gone farther than was necessary for his defense. 2.ID.; ID.; ID. — In such case the penalty imposed should be one degree lighter than that provided for homicide. 3.ID.; ID.; MITIGATING CIRCUMSTANCES. — The fact that the defendant was impelled by jealousy provoked by the adulterous relations between deceased and the wife of defendant is a mitigating circumstance which should be considered in fixing the penalty for homicide.
DECISION
TORRES, J : p
It appears in the present cause that on a certain day in the month of