Professional Documents
Culture Documents
IGA 2021 Week 2 Lecture Slides
IGA 2021 Week 2 Lecture Slides
Week Block
▪ Consolidation II ▪ Excursion to PwC in Zurich
3 3
Week
▪ Foreign Currency Translation
5
▪ Chapter 2: Reporting Intercorporate Investments and Consolidation of Wholly Owned Subsidiaries with No Differential
▪ Chapter 3: The Reporting Entity and the Consolidation of Less-than-Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries with No Differential
Learning objectives
▪ Understand and explain how ownership and control can influence the accounting for investments in common stock.
▪ Understand and explain the usefulness and limitations of consolidated financial statements.
▪ Prepare journal entries using the cost method and the equity method for accounting for investments.
▪ Understand and explain differences between the cost and equity methods.
▪ Make calculations and prepare basic elimination entries for a simple consolidation.
▪ Prepare a consolidation worksheet.
▪ Understand and explain differences in the consolidation process when the subsidiary is not wholly owned.
▪ Make calculations and prepare basic elimination entries for the consolidation of a less-than-wholly-owned subsidiary.
▪ Prepare a consolidation worksheet for a less-than-wholly-owned subsidiary.
▪ Understand and explain the purpose of combined financial statements and how they differ from consolidated financial
statements.
▪ Understand and explain rules related to the consolidation of variable interest entities.
▪ Understand and explain differences in consolidation rules under U.S. GAAP and IFRS.
Theories of Consolidation
Consolidation Techniques
“An investor controls an investee when it is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from
its involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those returns through its
power over the investee.” (IFRS 10.6)
Does X control K?
Does X control Y? X Does X control Z?
51% 75%
20% 40%
▪ Sometimes, majority stockholders may not be able to exercise control even though they hold more
than 50 percent of outstanding voting stock.
▪ Difference in the fiscal periods of a parent and subsidiary should not preclude consolidation.
▪ Often the fiscal period of the subsidiary is changed to coincide with that of the parent.
▪ Another alternative is to adjust the financial statement data of the subsidiary each period to place the
data on a basis consistent with the fiscal period of the parent.
Ownership Percentage
(determines the appropriate accounting method
provided that the test for control does not imply otherwise)
Theories of Consolidation
Consolidation Techniques
Proprietary Theory
▪ Assets and liabilities of the firm are considered to be those of the owners.
▪ Results in a pro rata consolidation where the parent consolidates only its proportionate share of a
less-than-wholly owned subsidiary’s assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses.
▪ Recognizes that although the parent does not have direct ownership or responsibility, it has the ability
to exercise effective control over all of the subsidiary’s assets and liabilities, not simply a
proportionate share.
Entity Theory
▪ Focuses on the firm as a separate economic entity rather than on the ownership rights of the
shareholders.
▪ Emphasis is on the consolidated entity itself, with the controlling and non-controlling shareholders
viewed as two separate groups, each having an equity in the consolidated entity.
▪ All of the assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses of a less-than-wholly owned subsidiary are
included in the consolidated financial statements, with no special treatment accorded either the
controlling or non-controlling interest.
▪ With the issuance of ASC 805, the FASB’s approach to consolidation now focuses on the entity theory.
Consideration transferred
= Goodwill
*
If NCI measured at fair value → full goodwill
If NCI measured at the NCI’s proportionate share of net assets of the acquiree → partial goodwill
IFRS allows a choice between full and partial goodwill; US GAAP: full goodwill is mandatory
Prof. Dr. Tami Dinh
Advanced Financial Accounting 19
Christensen/Cottrell/Budd (12e) 2019
Acquisition Cost and Goodwill Calculations
Full Goodwill vs. Partial Goodwill
Example:
ABC has acquired XYZ on 1 January 2014. The book value of equity of XYZ was $900m and the
fair value of its identifiable net assets was $1,100m. ABC has acquired 70% of the shares of
XYZ for $990m. The fair value of non-controlling interest was measured at $360m.
./. Net assets acquired 1,100 ./. Net assets acquired 1,100
Consideration
Book value of equity FV of identifiable net assets transferred/
FV
200
30% 270 330 360
60 30
70% 630 770 990
Hidden reserves: 140 Goodwill: 220
Excess of purchase price over book value of acquired net assets: 360
“Differential“: 450 (including excess of FV over BV of NCI)
Consolidation Techniques
Used when the investor lacks the ability either to control or to exercise significant influence over the
investee.
General Rules:
▪ Record income at the parent level ONLY when sub declares a dividend.
P
S
Generally, the sub’s income does not affect parent’s investment account balance.
Investment Account
Cost
Impairment
Loss
New Cost
Basis
Review
Assume P Corp creates a subsidiary, S Corp, and invests $100,000 cash in exchange for all of the $1 par
common stock (1,000 shares).
What journal entries would P and S make at the time of the investment?
P Corp:
P Investment in S Corp
Cash
100,000
100,000
S Corp:
S Cash
Common Stock
Additional Paid-in capital— CS
100,000
1,000
99,000
Accounting Procedures
▪ The cost method is consistent with the treatment normally accorded noncurrent assets.
▪ At the time of purchase, the investor records its investment in common stock at the total cost incurred
in making the purchase.
▪ The investment continues to be carried at its original cost until the time of sale.
▪ Income from the investment is recognized as dividends are declared by the investee.
ABC Company acquires 20 percent of XYZ Company’s common stock for $100,000 at the beginning of the
year but does not gain significant influence over XYZ. During the year, XYZ has net income of $60,000 and
pays dividends of $20,000. ABC Company records the following entries:
Cash 4,000
Dividend Income 4,000
Consolidation Techniques
Record income at the parent level based on sub’s earnings and losses
▪ Nevertheless, the investment generally goes up and down based on the operations of the investee
company.
Subsidiary’s dividends reduce the parent’s investment (the parent has less invested).
Cost
Income Losses Losses Income
Dividends
Adj. Bal.
The equity method is intended to reflect the investor’s changing equity or interest in the investee.
The investment is recorded at the initial purchase price and adjusted each period for the investor’s share
of the investee’s profits or losses and the dividends declared by the investee.
1. Corporate joint ventures: A joint venture is a joint arrangement whereby the parties that have joint
control of the arrangement have rights to the net assets of the arrangement (IAS 28.3)
2. Associated companies: An associate is an entity over which the investor has significant influence.
Significant influence is the “power to participate in the financial and operating policy decisions of the
investee but is not control or joint control of those policies. “(IAS 28.3)
The existence of “significant influence” by an entity is usually evidenced in one or more of the following
ways:
(a)representation on the board of directors or equivalent governing body of the investee;
(b)participation in policy-making processes, including participation in decisions about dividends or
other distributions;
(c)material transactions between the entity and its investee;
(d)interchange of managerial personnel; or
(e)provision of essential technical information
(IAS 28.6)
▪ In the absence of evidence to the contrary, an investor holding 20 percent or more of an investee’s
voting stock is presumed to have the ability to exercise significant influence over the investee
ABC Company acquires significant influence over XYZ Company by purchasing 20 percent of the common
stock of the XYZ Company for $100,000, XYZ earns income of $60,000 and pays dividends of $20,000.
Recognition of income
▪ This entry (equity accrual) is normally made as an adjusting entry at the end of the period
▪ If the investee reports a loss, the investor recognizes its share of the loss and reduces the carrying
amount of the investment by that amount
Recognition of dividends
Cash 4,000
Poll Question #2
Pros
Cons
▪ Unnecessary work if parent-company-only statements are not used internally or issued to outsiders.
Poll Question #3
Consolidation Techniques
Pea Corporation created Soup Corporation with a transfer of $500 cash. During Soup Corp.’s first year of
operations, it generated a net loss of $100 and paid no dividends. During Soup Corp.’s second year of
operations, it generated net income of $200 and paid dividends of $50. What is the balance in the
Investment in Sub account on Parent’s books at the end of year 2 using the equity method?
Investment in Sub
Record Pea Corp.’s 100% share of Soup Corp.’s Year 1 net loss.
Income from Soup Corp. 100
Investment in Soup. Corp. 100
Cash 50 Cash 50
Investment in Soup Corp. 50 Dividend Income 50
Consolidation Techniques
Consolidation Process
The objective is to combine the financial statements of two or more entities as if they are a single
corporation.
Wholly Owned Subsidiary Partially Owned Subsidiary
▪ It is either a created subsidiary or we assume it is purchased for an amount equal to the book value of
net assets.
▪ Certain accounts need to be eliminated in the consolidation process to avoid “double counting.”
Total Assets
Liabilities
Equity
Common Stock
Retained Earnings
Total Liabilities and Equity
▪ the flow of net income from the income statement to the statement of retained earnings and
▪ the transfer of the ending balance in retained earnings to the balance sheet.
Elimination entries are entered into the “Elimination Entries” column (debit or credit) to eliminate any
amounts that would result in “double counting.”
▪ The parent’s investment account (It represents the initial investment adjusted for the parent’s
cumulative share of the subsidiary’s income and dividends)
Investment in Sub
Beginning balance
500 Net Loss 100
The investment account represents the initial investment adjusted for the parent’s cumulative share of the
subsidiary’s income and dividends.
Note that the “blue” numbers appear Note that this is a deficit
in the basic elimination entry. balance!
0 0
Consolidation Techniques
Consolidation Process
Balance Sheet
Cash 250 100
Investment in Soup Corp. 550
PP&E (net) 900 600
Total Assets 1,700 700
Balance Sheet
Cash 250 100
Investment in Soup Corp. 550 550
PP&E (net) 900 600
Total Assets 1,700 700 0 550
Balance Sheet
Cash 250 100 350
Investment in Soup Corp. 550 550 0
PP&E (net) 900 600 1,500
Total Assets 1,700 700 0 550 1,850
Parent Consolidated
$350 = $350
Parent Consolidated
$400 = $400
Balance Sheet
• Prepare a
Cash 54,000 48,000 consolidation
Accounts Receivable 114,000 66,000 worksheet at
Inventory 204,000 90,000
12/31/11.
Investment in Smith, Inc. 156,000
Property, Plant, & Equipment 336,000 210,000
Less: Accumulated Depreciation (144,000) (30,000) • Assume Smith’s
Total Assets 720,000 384,000 accumulated
depreciation on
Accounts Payable 168,000 84,000
1/1/11 was
Long-term Debt 360,000 144,000
Common Stock 12,000 60,000 $20,000.
Retained Earnings 180,000 96,000
Total Liabilities & Equity 720,000 384,000
Objective:
Common Stock
Retained Earnings (BB)
Income from Smith, Inc.
Dividends Declared
Investment in Smith, Inc.
Objective:
210,000 20,000
20,000 20,000
190,000 0
Shows the Buildings and Equipment “as if” they have been
recorded on the Sub’s books as new assets at book value.
Balance Sheet
Cash 54'000 48'000 102'000
Accounts Receivable 114'000 66'000 180'000
Inventory 204'000 90'000 294'000
Investment in Smith, Inc. 156'000 156'000 0
Property, Plant, & Equipment 336'000 210'000 20'000 526'000
Less: Accumulated Depreciation -144'000 -30'000 20'000 -154'000
Total Assets 720'000 384'000 20'000 176'000 948'000
Consolidation Techniques
Consolidation Process
▪ Only a controlling interest is needed for the parent to consolidate the subsidiary—not 100% interest.
▪ Shareholders of the subsidiary other than the parent are referred to as “non-controlling”
shareholders.
▪ Non-controlling interest refers to the claim of these shareholders on the income and net assets of the
subsidiary.
NCI Parent
<50% >50%
Sub
Sub
Proportional Full
Consolidation Consolidation
Percent
< 100% 100%
Consolidated?
Reports NCI
No Yes
Amounts?
Complies with
No Yes
US GAAP/IFRS?
Relative
Easy Hard
Complexity?
Old rules: Could report it in equity, liabilities, or “no man’s land” between liabilities and equity.
▪ (a)fair value; or
▪ (b)the present ownership instruments' proportionate share in the recognised amounts of the
acquiree's identifiable net assets
Presentation
▪ The profit or loss and other comprehensive income available to all stockholders shall be
presented separately showing the income attributable to controlling and non-controlling
stockholders in the statement of profit or loss (IAS 1, 81b)
▪ IAS 1 (106) further requires a statement of changes in equity which includes the total
comprehensive income for the period, showing separately the total amounts attributable to
owners of the parent and to non-controlling interests
Prof. Dr. Tami Dinh
Advanced Financial Accounting 70
Christensen/Cottrell/Budd (12e) 2019
Consolidation of Partially Owned Subsidiary
Summary of Differences in Consolidation
The entity theory requires that the entity’s entire income and value be reported.
▪ The subsidiary’s income is divided between the parent (controlling interest) and the NCI
shareholders.
▪ The subsidiary’s net assets are divided between the parent (controlling interest) and the NCI
shareholders.
Consolidation Techniques
Poll Question #4
Investment Additional
Account = Common Paid-in Retained
NCI (30%) (70%) Stock Capital Earnings
Beginning Balance
+ Net Income
− Dividends
Ending Balance
The worksheet is modified when the parent owns less than 100% of the subsidiary.
Elimination Entries
Pinkett, Inc. Smith, Inc. DR CR Consolidated
Income Statement
Sales $ 840,000 $ 300,000
Less: COGS (516,000) (156,000)
Less: Depreciation Expense (12,000) (10,000)
Less: Other Expenses (192,000) (98,000)
Income from Smith, Inc. 32,400 32,400
Net Income $ 152,400 $ 36,000 32,400
NCI in Net Income 3,600
CI In Net Income $ 152,400 $ 36,000 36,000
20,000 20,000
190,000 0
Shows the Buildings and Equipment “as if” they have been recorded on the
Subsidiary’s books as new assets at book value.
Balance Sheet
Cash $ 58,800 $ 48,000
Accounts Receivable 114,000 66,000
Inventory 204,000 90,000
Investment in Sub 140,400 140,400
Property & Equipment 336,000 210,000 20,000
Accumulated Depreciation (144,000) (30,000) 20,000
Total Assets $ 709,200 $ 384,000 20,000 160,400
Balance Sheet
Cash $ 58,800 $ 48,000 $ 106,800
Accounts Receivable 114,000 66,000 180,000
Inventory 204,000 90,000 294,000
Investment in Sub 140,400 140,400
Property & Equipment 336,000 210,000 20,000 526,000
Accumulated Depreciation (144,000) (30,000) 20,000 (154,000)
Total Assets $ 709,200 $ 384,000 140,400 $ 952,800
Consolidation Techniques
→ A SPE is required to be consolidated when the substance of the relationship between an entity and
the SPE indicates that the SPE is controlled by that entity
• One of the largest companies in the United States (in 2000 the
firm claimed revenues in excess of USD 100 bn.)
• Enron used SPEs to obscure its true financial position from investors.
• Specifically Enron used SPEs to 1) accelerate profits, 2) minimize financial statement losses and
volatility (using SPEs to hedge on balance sheet risk) and 3) avoid adding debt to its balance sheet.
• Most of these SPEs were never consolidated and if so insufficient disclosure was provided so that
investors were misled about the true nature of the transactions being done.
• In a typical hedging transaction Enron would issue its own stock to a SPE in exchange for cash or a
note. The SPE would then use this stock to finance hedges to some of Enron’s on balance sheet
investments. However if the value of the investment declined so would Enron’s stock. As a result the
SPE could not carry out the hedge. Investors were left unaware of the fact that the SPEs relied on
Enron’s own stock to set up hedges!
Prof. Dr. Tami Dinh
Advanced Financial Accounting 85
Christensen/Cottrell/Budd (12e) 2019
Next Week
Week Block
▪ Consolidation II ▪ Excursion to PwC in Zurich
3 3
Week
▪ Foreign Currency Translation
5