Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chisinau
2017
This project is funded by the
European Union
SNRA Report
Report from the EC to the European Parliament and to the
Council on the assessment of the risks of money laundering
and terrorist financing affecting the internal market and
relating to cross-border situations (published on 26th of June
2017)
The sectors defined by Directive 2015/849, i.e. credit and financial institutions, money remitters, currency
exchange offices, high value goods and assets dealers, estate agents, trust and company service providers,
auditors, external accountants and tax advisors, notaries and other independent legal professionals, gambling
service providers.
The sectors that are not included in the scope of the Directive (EU) 2015/849 but were considered relevant
for the risk assessment, such as use of cash, virtual currencies, crowdfunding or non-profit organisations. It
also covers certain illegal means used by perpetrators such as Hawala and other similar informal value
transfer services providers.
I. Cash products
II. Financial sector products
III. Non-financial products
IV. Gambling sector products
V. Non-for-profit Organizations
VI. Horizontal vulnerabilities
Threat: TF/ML – 4
LEAs have gathered evidence that cash couriers are recurrently used by terrorist
groups to finance their activities or fund FTF travels. Organized crime
organizations also recurrently make use of cash couriers for the same reasons:
easily accessible, no expertise, no planning and low cost.
Threat: TF – 2, ML – 3
Sleeper terrorist cells are active in cash intensive businesses. Cash
intensive businesses are favored by criminal organizations to
launder proceeds of crime.
Vulnerabilities: TF/ML - 4
Widespread use of cash in EU economies. The sector seems being
not aware of this risk. Investigative capacities from LEAs are then
quite limited.
Threat: TF/ML - 4
Terrorist groups use recurrently cash, as this modus operandi is widely accessible and
low cost. Cash is at the basis of all illicit trafficking and illicit purchase of products.
For ML, cash is also the preferred option for criminals, which allows hiding illicit
proceeds of crime easily and moving funds rapidly, including cross border.
Vulnerabilities: TF/ML - 4
Cash payments may engage large transactions speedily and anonymously, including
cross-border. Usually low level of framework/controls in place, or enforcement of the
controls is not efficient. Organized crime and terrorism financing rely on cash
payments for carrying out their illegal activities and benefitting from them.
Threat: TF/ML - 3
Terrorist groups show some intent and capability to use currency exchange to sustain/carry out
their operations. This scenario does not require specific planning or expertise and has been used
already. High volumes of money can be easily converted and make the access to "clean"
currency easy for these criminal organizations.
Vulnerabilities: TF/ML - 3
Currency exchange offices deal most of the time with transactions in cash. Large denomination
notes are involved, and these are not properly monitored. High risk customers are recurrently
involved in such transactions. Competent authorities do not consider that the regulation and the
supervision work effectively.
Threat: TF/ML - 4.
Money Value Transfer Services (MVTS) are recurrently used to finance terrorist activities/ to
launder money and do not require specific knowledge or planning. LEAs and FIUs have
gathered strong evidence that these services are used to collect and transfers funds which
support the criminal activities. MVTS are, depending on their organization, easy to access
and do not require specific expertise or techniques to launder proceeds of crime.
The EC proposed in its proposal for amending Directive 2015/849 that VC exchange
platforms as well as custodian wallet providers are added to the list of obliged
entities under 4AMLD.
Threat: TF – 2, ML - 3.
Gold and precious metals couriers do not represent a preferred option for terrorist groups who tend to
favor more the use of cash. Unlike terrorist organizations, organized crime groups consider it as an
attractive way to launder proceeds of crime. It requires more planning than cash couriers but without
the need for major expertise as long as it concerns easy-tradable assets. LEAs report that other types
of precious metals have been used (silver, platinum) but these are not frequent because they are less
easily tradable and have higher exchange costs than gold/diamond.
Vulnerabilities: TF/ML – 4
Gold and other precious metals couriers are not properly monitored because of the limited awareness
of the sector. The controls in place are weak and the reliance on cash increases the vulnerability. There
are not enough controls in place for declaring movement of precious metals/stones at the EU external
border.
Enable authorities to act on amounts lower than the declaration threshold of EUR 10 000, where
there are suspicions of criminal activity;
Extend the definition of 'cash' so as to also include precious commodities acting as highly liquid
stores of value such as gold, and to prepaid payment cards which are currently not covered by the
standard cash control declaration.
Threat: TF/ML - 4.
The assessment of the TF threat related to investment in real estate has been considered in
conjunction with ML schemes related to investment in real estate in order to hide the illegal
origin of the funds. Reliance on real estate does not require specific expertise or knowledge,
and may be rather financially attractive depending on the services provided. Strong
evidence gathered by LEAs identifying real estate as recurrently used in ML schemes.
Vulnerabilities: TF/ML – 4.
The real estate sector is not sufficiently organized to ensure raising a correct level of risk
awareness. The involvement of different kinds of obliged entities in a real estate
transactions/ business relationships tend to dissuade the sector to conduct its own customer
due diligence. The level of STR is not satisfactory; the controls difficult to implement and
there is a weak information trail.
Mitigating measures
MS should provide guidance on risk factors arising from real estate transactions and
specific training to face situations where several professionals are involved in the
real estate transaction (estate agent, legal professional, financial institution).
Threat: TF/ML - 4.
The assessment of the TF threat related to services from accountants, auditors, tax advisors
has been considered in conjunction with ML schemes related to services from accountants,
auditors, tax advisors in order to hide the illegal origin of the funds. Services from tax
advisors/auditors/accountants are recurrently used in ML schemes, are considered as easily
accessible and seen by organized crime organizations as a way to compensate their lack of
expertise.
Vulnerabilities: TF/ML – 3.
Accountants, auditors and tax advisors are better organized than other legal professionals.
However, they suffer from the same weaknesses as far as the controls and the management of
the risks (BO in particular) are concerned.
Vulnerability
Relevant AML/CFT supervisory information is not/not sufficiently/not timely shared amongst the
competent AML/CFT supervisors at national and EU level.
Failure effectively to oversee agents and networks of agents for AML/CFT compliance purposes, in
particular where agents are based in another MS, risks leaving breaches or cases of abuse for financial
crime purposes undetected.
Supervisors do not dedicate sufficient human and organizational resources to AML/CFT supervision
of FI's, which undermines an effective supervision and sanctioning in the field of AML/CFT.
Supervisors have insufficiently identified the AML/CFT risks linked to the sectors they supervise,
and/or do not have risk based procedures in place to supervise these risks.
Raise awareness on ML/TF risks and identify the appropriate actions to further build
supervisors’ capacity in AML/CFT supervision.
Take further initiatives to improve cooperation between supervisors.
Provide updated guidelines on internal governance further clarifying expectations with
regard to the functions of compliance officers in financial institutions.
Provide an analysis of operational AML/CFT risks linked to the business/business model in
the corporate banking, private banking and institutional investment sector, as well as money
value transfer services and e-money.
Vulnerability
EU FIUs may have uneven powers allowing them to access relevant financial,
administrative and law enforcement information (especially those held by obliged entities
and/or law enforcement authorities).
There is a lack of available means in order to identify beneficial owners and holders of bank
account within a jurisdiction.
This may limit their operational capacity to carry out their intelligence functions and to
reply to requests made by another EU FIU.