Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ISM-Period 5
microcurrent.
2021, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8463469/.
Microcurrent can improve shoulder and knee pain without adverse effects.
This study also showed a major placebo response in treating knee pain.
The most common cause of disability is musculoskeletal pain which can be treated by
many things like anti-inflammatory drugs, but they have significant adverse affects.
Microcurrent delivers less than 1 mA of electrical current across the skin without
noticeable sensations or activation of muscle contractions.
MCT and placebo effects were tested.
MCT did not have as much of an effect with chronic LBP, but did majorly improve
subacromial impingement-induced shoulder pain and subacute to chronic knee pain.
“Placebo response accounted for 57% of the overall treatment effect on knee pain, which
was higher than that for shoulder pain (36%) and LBP (0%)
Sarah Hurt .
ISM-Period 5
Robv. “FSM vs. Microcurrent Therapy: What's the Difference?” Pain Free for Life, 25 Aug.
2022, https://painfreeforlife.com/fsm-vs-microcurrent-therapy-whats-the-difference/.
FSM and regular microcurrent both help treat pain and are forms of energy medicine with
electrical stimulation
Differences Between FSM and Microurrent:
o FSM is based on the idea that different frequency currents can target specific
tissues and promote healing
o FSM uses extremely low levels of electrical current and is usually delivered
through two channels and stimulates your body with 2 different frequencies at the
same time.
o FSM machines are usually big and bulky and require the adjustment of knobs and
dials to change current output
o FSM machines often require towels and water to sufficiently conduct electricity
properly
o Microcurrent treat the body while “running on algorithms which automatically
change those dials and settings”; less complex to work.
o Microcurrent is also said to be able to treat depression, anxiety, stress, brain fog,
poor vagal tone, chronic fatigue syndrome, insomnia, and more
Differences between Microcurrent and TENS:
o TENS units use higher power that they essentially paralyze pain pathways to
block pain signal; only temporary relief
o Microcurrent uses less intense energy impulse; can create long lasting results.
Differences between Microcurrent and Ultrasound
o Microcurrent can break up scarring and inflammation and encourage the
production of ATP by up to 500% while ultrasound “works through vibration but
does not provide current nor change the ATP status.
o Ultrasound sounds sound waves which vibrates cells and causes them to release
energy that treats inflammation.
Advantages of Microcurrent
o Gentler than FSM or TENS
o Believed to be more effective than other forms of stimulation in promoting
healing or reducing inflammation,