RICHELLE O.

DORDAS MAED
MIDTERM
1. Test of Hypothesis

a. H0 = There is no significant difference in the average daily sales of dog food based on shelf heights.
b. Ha = There is a significant difference in the average daily sales of dog food based on shelf heights.

2. Test Procedure: SHAPIRO – WILK TEST

3. a =0.01
4. Computation:
SPSS PROCEDURE: ANALYZE > DECRIPTIVE STATISTICS > EXPLORE >
PLOTS> NORMALITY PLOTS WITH TEST

Sig = 0.184 (for Knee Level)

Sig = 0.451 (for Waist Level)
Sig = 0.529 (for Eye Level)

a =0.01

5. Decision: Since Sig = > a =0.01; we do not reject the H 0.

6. Conclusions: at α=1%, the distribution is normal.

1. Test of Hypothesis

a. H0 = The sample data collected is random.

b. Ha = The sample data collected is not randpm
.
2. Test Procedure: RUN’S TEST FOR RANDOMNESS

3. a =0.01
4. Computation:
SPSS PROCEDURE: ANALYZE > NON PARAMETRIC TEST> LEGACY DIALOGS > RUNS

Sig = 0.310
 a =0.01
5. Decision: Since sig = 0.310 > a =0.01; we do not reject the H0.

6. Conclusions: at a =1%, the sample data were collected randomly.

1. Test of Hypothesis

a. H0 = The variances in sales for each level of shelf height is equal.

b. Ha = The variances in sales for each level of shelf height is not equal.

2. Test Procedure: HOMOGENEITY OF VARIANCE TEST (Levene’s Test)

3. a =0.01
4. Computation:
SPSS PROCEDURE: ANALYZE > COMPARE MEANS > ONE WAY ANOVA >
OPTIONS > HOMOGENEITY OF VARIANCE TEST
Sig = 0.466

a =0.01
5. Decision: Since sig = 0.466 > a =0.01; we do not reject the H0.

6. Conclusions: at a =1%, the variances in sales for each shelf height is equal.