Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Accounting Edited
Accounting Edited
Accounting
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
Professor’s Name
Due Date
2
Memo
Rose Corporation.
In response to the initial request to provide more information regarding the desirability of
employing either the equity method or the pro-rata consolidation method in financial accounting
and reporting for Rose Corporation in the joint venture with Krome Company, this paper
provides a detailed analysis. First, the equity method is mostly used in companies when reporting
their investments and specific corporate ventures as per ASC 323 (Betancourt & Baril, 2013). In
a broad spectrum, ASC 323 stipulates that a venture is an organization/entity owned and run as a
separate or specific project or business by a limited set of entities for the mutual advantage of the
The group may also include a government. A corporate joint venture is typically formed
to share risks and profits in establishing a new market, product, or technology, pool resources in
knowledge (Betancourt & Baril, 2013). A commercial joint venture normally includes an
agreement that allows each joint venturer to participate in the joint venture's overall
relationship beyond passive investors. A corporate partnership does not include a component
from one of the associated venturers (Betancourt & Baril, 2013). Also, a corporate joint venture's
ownership rarely changes, and its shares are rarely traded publicly. Therefore, a corporation's
non-controlling interest in public ownership, on the other hand, does not exclude it from being a
Bearing that the accounting standards and policies only outline or highlight guidance for
joint ventures with active or valid common stock issued, these standards do not incorporate
policies and provisions for treating ownership of non-corporate ventures (Gonzales, 2013). The
ASC 323 highlights that the equity method would be appropriate for these non-incorporated
firms as well. Suppose the joint venture with Krome Company is non-incorporated, Rose
corporations would own an undivided interest in each asset under the joint venture and would
bear the liability of such assets either in full amount or in partial fulfilment of the total amount
(Gonzales, 2013). In this regard, pro-rata consolidation would provide a comprehensive and
more elaborate picture of Rose's assets and liabilities as per the business concerns. Suppose the
joint venture is incorporated, then Rose does not claim a higher percentage of the assets in the
joint business and corresponding liabilities as the liabilities would be encompassed under the
joint venture’s corporate model (Sekerez, 2020). Therefore, the equity method would still be
appropriate in this joint venture according to the provisions stipulated under ASC 323.
Since purchases are made in the proportion of 70% and 30% for Rose and Krome
Companies, respectively, the journal entries and other accounting data should be adjusted at
year-end using the equity procedure as the entities included in the joint venture have different
4
capacities regardless of whether or not they are incorporated. In conclusion, the equity method
suits the venture than the pro-rata method because the equity method employs periodic
adjustment of entries to ascertain the reality in costs and revenues while the pro-rata method uses
the full entry procedure, which may cause inconsistencies within the accounting process and
record keeping.
5
References
Betancourt, L., & Baril, C. P. (2013). Accounting for joint ventures moves closer to
Sekerez, V. (2020). Informational scopes and the area of application of the equity