Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The employees must work in close coordination with each other and try their level best to
achieve the organization’s goals.
It is essential to manage the employees well for them to feel indispensable for the
organization.
Organization management helps to extract the best out of each employee so that they
accomplish the tasks within the given time frame.
Organization management binds the employees together and gives them a sense of loyalty
towards the organization.
Staffing – Concept
Once the organisational goals are set, the plans are prepared and organisation is
appropriately structured to pave the path for achievement of the set goals. The next step is
to provide appropriate personnel to fill in the various positions created by the
organisational structure. The process putting people to jobs is termed as staffing. Staffing,
the management function involves appointing appropriate personnel, developing them to
meet organisational needs and ensuring that they are a satisfied and happy workforce.
Staffing is defined as a managerial function of filling and keeping filled the positions in the
organisational structure. The personnel appointed are a combination of permanent
employees, daily workers, consultants, contract employees etc.
Staffing includes:
1. Identifying the requirement of workforce and its planning.
2. Recruitment and selection of appropriate personnel for new jobs or for positions which
may arise as a result of existing employees leaving the organisation.
3. Planning adequate training for development and growth of workforce.
4. Deciding on compensation, promotion and performance appraisals for the workforce.
Recruitment process is the first step in creating a powerful resource base. The process
undergoes a systematic procedure starting from sourcing the resources to arranging and
conducting interviews and finally selecting the right candidates.
Recruitment Planning
Recruitment planning is the first step of the recruitment process, where the vacant
positions are analyzed and described. It includes job specifications and its nature,
experience, qualifications and skills required for the job, etc.
A structured recruitment plan is mandatory to attract potential candidates from a pool of
candidates. The potential candidates should be qualified, experienced with a capability to
take the responsibilities required to achieve the objectives of the organization.
Identifying Vacancy
The first and foremost process of recruitment plan is identifying the vacancy. This process
begins with receiving the requisition for recruitments from different department of the
organization to the HR Department, which contains −
Physical specifications
Mental specifications
Physical features
Emotional specifications
Behavioral specifications
A job specification document provides information on the following elements −
Qualification
Experiences
Training and development
Skills requirements
Work responsibilities
Emotional characteristics
Planning of career
Job Evaluation
Job evaluation is a comparative process of analyzing, assessing, and determining the relative
value/worth of a job in relation to the other jobs in an organization.
The main objective of job evaluation is to analyze and determine which job commands how
much pay. There are several methods such as job grading, job classifications, job
ranking, etc., which are involved in job evaluation. Job evaluation forms the basis for salary
and wage negotiations.
Recruitment Strategy
Recruitment strategy is the second step of the recruitment process, where a strategy is
prepared for hiring the resources. After completing the preparation of job descriptions and
job specifications, the next step is to decide which strategy to adopt for recruiting the
potential candidates for the organization.
While preparing a recruitment strategy, the HR team considers the following points −
Promotions
Transfers
Former Employees
Internal Advertisements (Job Posting)
Employee Referrals
Previous Applicants
External Sources
External sources of recruitment refer to hiring employees outside the organization through
−
Direct Recruitment
Employment Exchanges
Employment Agencies
Advertisements
Professional Associations
Campus Recruitment
Word of Mouth
Screening / Shortlisting
Screening starts after completion of the process of sourcing the candidates. Screening is the
process of filtering the applications of the candidates for further selection process.
Screening is an integral part of recruitment process that helps in removing unqualified or
irrelevant candidates, which were received through sourcing. The screening process of
recruitment consists of three steps −
Reviewing of Resumes and Cover Letters
Reviewing is the first step of screening candidates. In this process, the resumes of the
candidates are reviewed and checked for the candidates’ education, work experience, and
overall background matching the requirement of the job
While reviewing the resumes, an HR executive must keep the following points in mind, to
ensure better screening of the potential candidates −
Most of the research in organisational behaviour has been concerned with the
following work related attitudes:
1. Job Satisfaction:
The term job satisfaction refers to the general attitude or feelings of an individual towards
his job. A person, who is highly satisfied with his job, will have a positive attitude towards
the job. On the other hand, a person who is dissatisfied with his job will have a negative
attitude about the job. For example, a person who is satisfied with his job will always be
punctual, absenteeism will be minimum, performance will be high, his attitude towards his
co-workers and boss will also be very positive.
In case of a dissatisfied person, he will generally be late for office, on small pretexts he will
absent himself from the job, turnover will be high, performance level will be poor and his
behaviour in the organisation will be very good. When people speak of employee attitudes,
they invariably relate these with job satisfaction. In fact, these two are used
interchangeably, though some differences do exist between these two.
2. Job Involvement:
As compared to job satisfaction, job involvement is a more recent addition to the literature
of organisational behaviour. Different authors have given different meanings to this term
and there isn’t complete agreement over what the term means. A general definition of job
involvement states that job involvement measures Job involvement is the degree to which a
person identifies psychologically with his or her job and considers his or her perceived
performance level important to self worth.
Employees who have a high level of job involvement very strongly identify with their jobs
and really care about the kind of work they do. High degree of involvement just like job
satisfaction will lead to less absenteeism and lower resignation rates. However, the
research has shown that it seems to more consistently predict turnover than absenteeism.
In case of turnover, the research has shown as much as 16% variation in the turnover
depending upon the level of job involvement.
3. Organisational Commitment:
The third job attitude that affects the organisation behaviour is the organisational
commitment. Organisational commitment is a state in which an employee identifies with a
particular organisation and its goals and wishes to maintain membership in the
organisation. In such a setup the employee feels proud of being the employee of a
particular organisation. Whereas job involvement refers to identification with one’s
specific job, organisational commitment means identifying with one’s employing
organisation and its goals.
Sometimes an employee may be involved or attached to his job but may not be committed
to the organisation and its objectives. Turnover and absenteeism are low when an
employee has organisational commitment. In fact, studies have indicated that
organisational commitment is a better indicator of turnover than the far more frequently
used job satisfaction predictor.
Sometimes, an employee may be dissatisfied with the job, but he may not be dissatisfied
with the organisation as a whole. In such a case, he may stick with the organisation because
he may consider it a temporary situation. But once the dissatisfaction spreads to the
organisation as a whole, he is most likely to consider resigning from the job.
Functions of Attitudes:
In studying organisational behaviour, it is very important to understand the functions of
attitudes : According to California Management Review, 1995, an analysis, based on
extensive review of surveys of employers concluded that “the most important
consideration in hiring and biggest deficit among new work force entrants are the attitudes
concerning work that they bring with them to their new jobs. ” Attitudes can help in
predicting human behaviour at work. An understanding of attitudes is also important
because attitudes help people adapt to their work environment.
For example, if employees who are well treated are asked about management or the
organisation they are likely to say good things. These employees are very loyal to the
management also. On the other hand, if the employees are berated or they are given
minimum salary increases or they have less job satisfaction, the reverse may be true.
They may develop an attitude that such newcomers are less qualified and they might
mistreat these workers. This attitude helps the workers protect the ego and is known as an
ego defensive attitude. This ego defensive attitude is used by the employees in coping with
a feeling of guilt or threat. Unless this feeling is removed, this kind of attitude will Remain
unchanged.
Why should managers know about these attitude functions? Such a knowledge can help the
managers in two ways firstly, he will understand and predict how a certain person is likely
to behave. Secondly, it can help the management in changing the attitudes of another
person. They can do this by changing the conditions that sustain the attitude.
Measurement of Attitudes:
Undoubtedly the attitudes of people tend to be relatively stable but can always be notified
at least to some extent. Certain difference in employee’s attitudes is inevitable and is
responsible for the effectiveness of individuals within an organisation. There are certain
ways by which it is possible for the supervisor and managers to get some inkling of
attitudes of individuals such as listening to the chance remarks of individuals, the
behaviour of individuals in the work place etc.
A sensitive intuitive supervisor can always get a feeling with respect to the general reaction
of his work group even though he cannot pinpoint such reactions specifically. The other
way to find attitude change is the analysis of certain factors such as turnover rate,
absenteeism and production level. Various methods have been developed for doing this.
(ii) Each of these statements is typed on a separate slip of paper and the judge is asked to
place each statement in one of several piles (usually 7, 9 or 11) ranging from statement
judged to express the least favourable view points to statements judged to express the
most favourable viewpoints (7, 9 or 11).
(iii) Statements judged to express varying degrees of favourable-ness in between these
extremes are placed in the piles that are judged best to characterize their relative degree of
favourable-ness.
(iv) Many judges are used in the process, sometimes as many as 100 or more. These judges
are assisting the construction of the scale. They are not having their attitudes measured.
The allocation of statements to the several piles is a part of the process of constructing the
scale.
The purpose of allocation is to determine the scale value of the various statements. If all
judges tend to place a statement in piles towards the favourable then we can conclude that
the statement expresses a favourable attitude towards the company. If the statement is
placed by the judges in piles towards unfavourable end of the series, then we may conclude
that an unfavourable attitude is expressed by that particular statement. So we can
determine the average location of the statement by the judge. Statements that are scattered
by the judge over several categories are eliminated.
The use of different statements in scales measuring the same attitude helps in checking
results by a repeat test in order to be sure of conclusion reached and to measure the
effectiveness of systematic company effort to improve employee morale.
2. Likert Scale:
Likert’s method is simpler than Thurstone method and does not require the use of judges
in scaling the statements. While a number of different procedures were tried and compared
but the simplest method described by Likert was found to give results that correlated very
highly with more complex methods.
Each statement has five degrees of approval and asks the person taking the scale to
check one of the five degrees:
1. Strongly approved
2. Approved
3. Undecided
4. Disapproved
5. Strongly disapproved.
There are three principal methods of establishing the validity of a measuring device:
(i) Comparing the results obtained from it with those of another device, the validity of
which has been established.
The validity of the Likert scale established by a comparison of the same with an already
established scale of Thurston is an example of judgment technique adopted.
3. Opinions Surveys:
Attitude scales help to measure the attitudes of individuals by summarising data for all
employees within a group, such scale can be used to quantify ‘morale’ of employee groups.
Attitude scales can be useful in indicating the relative level of morale of employees group,
but these do not enable the management to identify specific factors that may be sources of
employee’s unrest or un-satisfaction. This specific information can be obtained by the use
of questionnaire that provides for giving opinions about specific matters such as working
conditions, future prospects, company policies, perquisites etc. The usual practice in
opinion questionnaire is that of obtaining a single response to each question in either ‘yes’
or ‘no’. In particular, the employees may be asked to check each item in one of the three
boxes.
He should also check each item as being of great importance. It is possible to develop a
questionnaire that can serve the purposes of obtaining opinions of employees and
measuring their attitudes. The data collected by the questionnaires can be compiled,
tabulated and analyzed to know about the attitude of workers towards management and
the organisation.
4. Interviews:
Still another method of obtaining information about personnel reaction is the use of
interviews. The workers should be interviewed by the representatives of some outside
organisations such as a consultancy firm or a university department. The employees are
given assurance that the information furnished will not be used for any administrative
function. In a guided interview, the interviewer asks a series of questions so that each of
which may be answered by a simple. Yes or No or by some other words or phrases. In the
unguided interview, the interviewer asks more general questions to encourage
the employee to express himself and solicit information about his job satisfaction, job
involvement and job commitment.
Explain Leadership.
Leadership can be defined as the ability of the management to make sound decisions and
inspire others to perform well. It is the process of directing the behavior of others towards
achieving a common goal. In short, leadership is getting things done through others.
Importance of Leadership
Leadership is very important in a firm as it leads to higher performance by the team
members, it improves motivation and morale within the members, and helps to respond to
change.
Leadership facilitates organizational success by creating responsibility and accountability
among the members of the organization. In short, it increases value in an organization.
Leader Vs Manager
A leader is someone whom people follow or someone who guides or directs others. A
manager is someone who is responsible for directing and controlling the work and staff in
an organization, or of a department within it.
The main difference between the two is that a leader works by example, while a manager
dictates expectations. If a manager goes against the rules, that will tarnish his position as a
manager. If a leader goes against the example he or she is trying to set, that will be seen as
a setback. Following are a few subtle differences between the two −
A leader is an innovator and creator whereas a manager is a commander.
A leader can’t be a manager but the opposite is possible, a manager is more than a
leader.
A leader does what is right, while the manager makes things right.
A leader deals with change whereas a manager plans for a change.
A leader gives direction to do something whereas the manager plans for everything
that is to be done.
A leader encourages people whereas the manager controls people.
A leader handles communication, credibility, and empowerment whereas a manager
deals with organizing and staffing.
Leadership Styles
Different leadership styles exist in work environments. The culture and goal of an
organization determine which leadership style fits best. Some organizations offer different
leadership styles within an organization, depending on the necessary tasks to complete and
departmental needs.
We find five different leadership styles in the corporate world. They are as follows −
Laissez-Faire
A laissez-faire leader does not directly supervise employees and fails to provide regular
updates to those under his supervision. Highly experienced and trained employees with
minimal requirement of supervision fall under the laissez-faire leadership style.
But, not all employees possess these features. This leadership style blocks the production
of employees needing supervision. The laissez-faire style implements no leadership or
supervision efforts from managers, which can lead to poor production, lack of control and
increasing costs.
Autocratic
The autocratic leadership style permits managers to make decisions alone without the input
of others. Managers access total authority and impose their will on employees. No one
opposes the decisions of autocratic leaders. Countries like Cuba and North Korea operate
under the autocratic leadership style.
This leadership style benefits those who require direct supervision. Creative employees
who participate in group functions detest this leadership style.
Participative
This is also known as the democratic leadership style. It values the input of team members
and peers, but the responsibility of making the final decision rests with the participative
leader. Participative leadership motivates employee morale because employees make
contributions to the decision-making process. It accounts to a feeling that their opinions
matter.
When an organization needs to make changes within itself, that is internally, the
participative leadership style helps employees accept changes easily as they play a role in
the process. This leadership style meets challenges when companies need to make a
decision in a short period of time.
Transactional
Transactional leadership style is formed by the concept of reward and punishment.
Transactional leaders believe that the employee's performance is completely dependent on
these two factors. When there is an encouragement, the workers put in their best effort and
the bonus is in monetary terms in most of the cases. In case they fail to achieve the set target
they are given a negative appraisal.
Transactional leaders pay more attention to physical and security requirements of the
employees.
Transformational
Transformational leadership has the ability to affect employee's perceptions through the
returns that organization gets in the form of human capital benefits. These leaders have the
ability to reap higher benefits by introducing knowledge management processes,
encouraging interpersonal communication among employees and creating healthy
organizational culture.
It helps in flourishing organizational innovation by creating a participative environment or
culture. It promotes a culture where the employees have autonomy to speak about their
experiences and share knowledge.
It has been seen that transformational leaders are more innovative than transactional and
laisse-faire leaders.
Traditional Theory
Traditional theory is a theory based on different traits of a human beings. It assumes that
leaders are born and not made. According to this theory, leadership behavior is the sum
total of all traits that a leader possess.
Thus this theory gives the profile of a successful and complete leader. According to this
theory, there are five human traits. They are −
Physical trait − it includes energy, activity, appearance, and height.
Ability trait − it includes judgement, knowledge, and luency in speech.
Personal trait − it includes self-confidence, creativity, and enthusiasm.
Work trait − it includes organization and achievement.
Social trait − it includes interpersonal skill, cooperativeness, popularity and
prestige.
Drawbacks
Following are the major drawbacks of this theory −
Features of Leadership
Group process: It is a group process that involves two or more people together
interacting with each other. A leader cannot lead without the followers.
Dependent on the situation: It is situation bound as it all depends upon tackling the
situations present. Thus, there is no single best style of leadership.
Importance of Leadership:
Initiating Action: Leadership starts from the very beginning, even before the work
actually starts. A leader is a person who communicates the policies and plans to the
subordinates to start the work.
Providing Motivation: A leader motivates the employees by giving them financial and
non-financial incentives and gets the work done efficiently. Motivation is the driving
force in an individual’s life.
Providing guidance: A leader not only supervises the employees but also guides them in
their work. He instructs the subordinates on how to perform their work effectively so
that their efforts don’t get wasted.
Building work environment: A good leader should maintain personal contacts with the
employees and should hear their problems and solve them. He always listens to the
point of view of the employees and in case of disagreement persuades them to agree
with him by giving suitable clarifications. In case of conflicts, he handles them carefully
and does not allow it to adversely affect the entity. A positive and efficient
work environment helps in stable growth of the organization.
Co-ordination: A leader reconciles the personal interests of the employees with the
organizational goals and achieves co-ordination in the entity.
Creating Successors: A leader trains his subordinates in such a manner that they can
succeed him in future easily in his absence. He creates more leaders.
Induces change: A leader persuades, clarifies and inspires employees to accept any
change in the organization without much resistance and discontentment. He makes
sure that employees don’t feel insecure about the changes.
Often, the success of an organization is attributed to its leaders. But, one must not forget that
it’s the followers who make a leader successful by accepting his leadership. Thus, leaders and
followers collectively play a key role to make leadership successful.
Qualities of a Leader
Personality: A pleasing personality always attracts people. A leader should also friendly
and yet authoritative so that he inspires people to work hard like him.
Knowledge: A subordinate looks up to his leader for any suggestion that he needs. A
good leader should thus possess adequate knowledge and competence in order to
influence the subordinates.
Integrity: A leader needs to possess a high level of integrity and honesty. He should have
a fair outlook and should base his judgment on the facts and logic. He should be
objective and not biased.
Initiative: A good leader takes initiative to grab the opportunities and not wait for them
and use them to the advantage of the organization.
Self-confidence and Will Power: A leader needs to have a high level of self-confidence
and immense will-power and should not lose it even in the worst situations, else
employees will not believe in him.
Intelligence: A leader needs to be intelligent enough to analyze the pros and cons of a
situation and take a decision accordingly. He also needs to have a vision and fore-
sightedness so that he can predict the future impact of the decisions taken by him.
Decisiveness: A leader has to be decisive in managing his work and should be firm on the
decisions are taken by him.
Social skills: A leader should possess empathy towards others. He should also be a
humanist who also helps the people with their personal problems. He also needs to
possess a sense of responsibility and accountability because with great authority comes
great responsibility.
Leadership and Management
Leadership and management are the terms that are often considered synonymous. It is
essential to understand that leadership is an essential part of effective management. As a
crucial component of management, remarkable leadership behaviour stresses upon
building an environment in which each and every employee develops and excels.
Leadership is defined as the potential to influence and drive the group efforts towards the
accomplishment of goals. This influence may originate from formal sources, such as that
provided by acquisition of managerial position in an organization.
A manager must have traits of a leader, i.e., he must possess leadership qualities. Leaders
develop and begin strategies that build and sustain competitive advantage. Organizations
require robust leadership and robust management for optimal organizational efficiency.
What is Leadership?
Next, in this leadership vs management article, we will discover what management is all
about.
What is Management?
Management is all about performing pre-planned tasks on a regular basis with the help of
subordinates. A manager is completely responsible for carrying out the four important
functions of management: planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. Managers can only
become leaders if they adequately carry out leadership responsibilities, including
communication of good and bad, providing inspiration and guidance, and encouraging
employees to rise to a higher level of productivity.
But, unfortunately, not all managers can achieve that. Managerial responsibilities are often
outlined in a job description, with subordinates following because of the professional title
or classification. A manager's primary focus is on meeting organizational goals; they often
do not take much else into consideration. With the title comes the authority and the
privilege to promote, hire, or reward employees based on their performance and behavior.
Difference Between Leadership and Management
It is possible to be a manager and a leader at the same time. But keep in mind that just
because someone is a great leader doesn't mean they'll be a great manager or the other
way around. So, what factors distinguish these two roles? Moving ahead in this leadership
vs management article, we explore those factors.
1. Differences in Vision
Leaders are considered as visionaries. They set the pathways to excel the organizational
growth. They always examine where their organization stands, where they want to go, and
how they can reach there by involving the team.
2. Organizing vs Aligning
Managers achieve their goals by using coordinated activities and tactical processes. They
break down long-time goals into tiny segments and organize available resources to reach
the desired outcome.
On the other hand, leaders are more concerned with how to align and influence people than
how to assign work to them. They achieve this by assisting individuals in envisioning their
function in a wider context and the possibility for future growth that their efforts may give.
3. Differences in Queries
A leader asks what and why, whereas a manager focuses on the questions how and when.
To do justice to their duties as a leader, one might question and challenge the authority to
reverse decisions that may not be in the better interests of the team. If a firm has a
stumbling block, a leader will be the one to step up and ask, What did we learn from this?
and Why has this happened?
On the other hand, managers are not required to assess and analyze failures. Their job
description emphasizes asking How and When, which assists them in ensuring that plans
are carried out correctly. They prefer to accept the status quo and make no attempt to
change it.
4. Position vs Quality
A manager is a member of an organization with the responsibility of carrying out the four
important functions of management: planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. But are
all managers leaders?
Most managers also tend to be leaders, but only IF they also adequately carry out the
leadership responsibilities of management, which include communication, motivation,
providing inspiration and guidance, and encouraging employees to rise to a higher level of
productivity.
Unfortunately, not all managers are leaders. Some managers have poor leadership qualities,
and employees follow orders from their managers because they are obligated to do so—not
necessarily because they are influenced or inspired by the leader.
Managerial duties are usually a formal part of a job description; subordinates follow as a
result of the professional title or designation. A manager’s chief focus is to meet
organizational goals and objectives; they typically do not take much else into consideration.
Managers are held responsible for their actions, as well as for the actions of their
subordinates. With the title comes the authority and the privilege to promote, hire, fire,
discipline, or reward employees based on their performance and behavior.
The primary difference between management and leadership is that leaders don’t
necessarily hold or occupy a management position. Simply put, a leader doesn’t have to be
an authority figure in the organization; a leader can be anyone.
Unlike managers, leaders are followed because of their personality, behavior, and beliefs. A
leader personally invests in tasks and projects and demonstrates a high level of passion for
work. Leaders take a great deal of interest in the success of their followers, enabling them
to reach their goals to satisfaction—these are not necessarily organizational goals.
There isn’t always tangible or formal power that a leader possesses over his followers.
Temporary power is awarded to a leader and can be conditional based on the ability of the
leader to continually inspire and motivate their followers.
Subordinates of a manager are required to obey orders while following is optional when it
comes to leadership. Leadership works on inspiration and trust among employees; those
who do wish to follow their leader may stop at any time. Generally, leaders are people who
challenge the status quo. Leadership is change-savvy, visionary, agile, creative, and
adaptive.
Managers build a strategic vision and break it down into a roadmap for their team to
follow.
Managers are responsible for day-to-day efforts while reviewing necessary resources,
and anticipating needs to make changes along the way.
3. Process Management
Managers have the authority to establish work rules, processes, standards, and
operating procedures.
4. People Focused
Managers are known to look after and cater to the needs of the people they are
responsible for: listening to them, involving them in certain key decisions, and
accommodating reasonable requests for change to contribute to increased productivity.
1. Vision
A leader knows where they stand, where they want to go and tend to involve the team in
charting a future path and direction.
Leaders have people who believe them and walk by their side down the path the leader
sets.
3. Inspiration
Leaders are usually inspirational—and help their team understand their own roles in a
bigger context.
4. Communication Skills
Leaders always keep their team informed about what’s happening, both present and the
future—along with any obstacles that stand in their way.
5. Ability to Challenge
Leaders are those that challenge the status quo. They have their style of doing things
and problem-solving and are usually the ones who think outside the box.
Being a manager and a leader at the same time is a viable concept. But remember, just
because someone is a phenomenal leader, it does not necessarily guarantee that the person
will be an exceptional manager as well, and vice versa. So, what are the standout
differences between the two roles?
1. A leader invents or innovates while a manager organizes
The leader of the team comes up with new ideas and kickstarts the organization’s shift
or transition to a forward-thinking phase. A leader always has his or her eyes set on the
horizon, developing new techniques and strategies for the organization. A leader has
immense knowledge of all the current trends, advancements, and skillsets—and has a
clarity of purpose and vision. By contrast, a manager is someone who generally only
maintains what is already established. A manager needs to watch the bottom line while
controlling employees and workflow in the organization and preventing any chaos.
In his book, The Wall Street Journal Essential Guide to Management: Lasting Lessons
from the Best Leadership Minds of Our Time, Alan Murray cites that a manager is
someone who “establishes appropriate targets and yardsticks, and analyzes, appraises
and interprets performance.” Managers understand the people they work with and
know which person is the best fit for a specific task.
A leader is a person who pushes employees to do their best and knows how to set an
appropriate pace and tempo for the rest of the group. Managers, on the other hand, are
required by their job description to establish control over employees, which, in turn,
helps them develop their assets to bring out their best. Thus, managers have to
understand their subordinates well to do their job effectively.
3. A leader asks the questions “what” and “why", whereas a manager leans more
towards the questions “how” and “when”:
To be able to do justice to their role as a leader, some may question and challenge
authority to modify or even reverse decisions that may not have the team’s best
interests in mind. Good leadership requires a great deal of good judgment, especially
when it comes to the ability to stand up to senior management over a point of concern
or if there is an aspect in need of improvement. If a company goes through a rough
patch, a leader will be the one who will stand up and ask the question: “What did we
learn from this?”Managers, however, are not required to assess and analyze failures.
Their job description emphasizes asking the questions “how” and “when,” which usually
helps them make sure that plans are properly executed. They tend to accept the status
quo exactly the way it is and do not attempt a change.
Leadership and Environmental
The need for Environmental Leadership
There is no escaping the fact that responding to climate change (and breaking through the
inertia associated with climate change action) is now a global priority for all governments,
businesses and organizations. The global ability to develop and deploy environmental
leaders into societal beneficial roles must now be a priority in our response.
There are a myriad of environmental leaders out there holding down responsible posts in
business, political, and public leadership. In their work they focus on a wide variety of
issues covering environmental policy and management, single issue activism, the
regulation of licensed activities and service provision. It is not the intention of this blog to
define WHAT is being led across these various interests, rather to help those who are
interested in Environmental Leadership, or those individuals who I work with, to develop
the skills and approaches they can use to ‘Get ‘Green Done’ in their respective roles.
Traditional business models and the organisational leadership that has arisen around such
models have evolved with a bias that firstly, natural resources are limitless and secondly,
that Business behaviours were separate from environmental and social concerns. This has
given rise to a long catalogue of environmental disasters, the pollution of ecosystems and
examples of social harm through industrial activities. The risk has been that businesses are
encouraged to view the exploitation of natural resources and their eco-systems as free
commodities for exploitation. Slowly, as unintended consequences of industrial activity
have arisen there has been a transformative shift towards more responsible management
behaviours as societal opinions have determined what is unacceptable business behaviour
in the pursuit of growth and profit.
Leadership experience
With experience comes wisdom. How do you gain experience? often through repeated lack
of experience! One of the most startling concepts of environmental leadership, and one that
many experienced environmental leaders come to realise, is that environmental and social
issues permeate virtually all area boundaries within an organisation and its business
activities. These often comprise the intangible factors in business management,
Companies also own a variety of assets that cannot be touched or seen; these are intangible
assets, such as goodwill (employee or customer), patents, trademarks, copyrights and
more. They also have undefined activities, responsibilities and services that merge between
business units or are external to the organisation. Ill-defined in nature or emerging they
can have a critical impact on business success ands future growth.
KE Y I N T AN G I B L E ASSE T G RO U PS
To help simplify matters, these asset groups can be summarised between three common
types
Human capital – the value driven by the accumulated skills, knowledge and
experience of a business’s employees
Relationship capital – the value tied up in positive relationships between an
organisation and its employees, suppliers, partners and customers
Brand capital – the value realised through consistent visual and verbal
communications, and idiosyncratic corporate behaviours
Collectively these intangible asset groups can now comprise the majority share of
corporate value. Despite their impact on value intangible assets are not widely understood
or well managed by many leadership teams. Equally important in todays business world –
many of these intangible parameters have an environmental or social (sustainability)
origin! The lack of ‘ownership’ and environmental leadership within many organisation of
these assets means that they are often ignored as risks.
Environmental Leadership – The Management of Tangible and Intangible Value
It is still common for many environmental management posts to be set at mid or junior
level responsibilities with organisations. Many operate as sole traders without any direct
line responsibilities for other staff. In these roles the post holders are expected to influence
without any defined authority, set the environmental culture and process organisational
change across departmental boundaries. The expectation is that they exert influence up &
down and across established management power chains, and through peer-to-peer
contacts inside and outside their organisation.
Berry and Gordon stated that leadership, at least in terms of environmental leadership, is
not yet sufficiently contained within any accepted theory of leadership for it to provide a
reliable basis for thought and action. In their view environmental leaders were more
reliant on their past experience, current observation, and individual thinking when
undertaking their professional duties.
Five environmental & social risks within its top 10 risks likely to influence global
business stability (Extreme weather, Natural disasters, Failure of climate-change
mitigation and adaptation, Large-scale involuntary migration and Man-made
environmental disasters); and that
Eight of the Top 10 business risks were attributable to environmental or social
factors (Extreme weather events, Natural disasters, Failure of climate-change
mitigation and adaptation, Water crises, Food crises, Biodiversity loss and ecosystem
collapse, Large-scale involuntary migration, Spread of infectious diseases)
Few of those tasked with addressing these issues in business, government or society are
likely to have attended leadership training courses or have achieved significant formal
business management training!
Today, the challenge for the environmental professions is how Higher Education,
Professional Institutes and business in general can be encouraged or retrofitted to provide
the Environmental Leaders we will need to safeguard our collective future.
Leadership and power
An ordinary person can influence, grow, and help others without essentially being the
team’s coach. Similarly, it is feasible to wield power without being in such a position of
authority in many settings.
An ordinary person can influence, grow, and help others without essentially being the
team’s coach. Similarly, it is feasible to wield power without being in such a position of
authority in many settings.
Power is widely described as an individual’s capacity to exert a certain type of control over
another human. Power comes from an authority position, and it is classified into legitimate,
coercive, and expert power. Individuals frequently utilize power for their own selfish
enrichment, as the expression goes, ‘Power Corrupts.’
Leadership entails developing a vision, persuading others to strive toward that aspiration,
and forming a team. In order to influence people, a leader must be believable. Power is
required for effective leadership. To properly inspire followers, all leaders must wield
some type of the influence.
Parameters of
Power Leadership
Comparison
Autocratic, democratic,
Types Coercive, legitimate, referent
transformational, monarchical
Power is widely described as an individual’s capacity to exert some type of influence over
another human. Power and influence have a separate connection. It is a causal efficacy that
can be a visible change in economic or an emotional strain that drives humans to pick a
specific choice over another.
As a child, your family had a strong impact on your activities, and you would frequently
strive to replicate their favored behavior in order to please them. The same is true at
school, where teachers may readily persuade you to do one thing over another. In both of
these circumstances, your parents and instructors have acquired authority that allows
them to exert influence over you.
Furthermore, there are alternative sources of power that may be used. The capacity to
award followers or provide some type of benefit is referred to as reward power. While
coercive power stems from the ability to impose penalties or sanctions.
Few instances of different kinds of power are legitimate power which is obtained by a role
of official status in an organization or through a vote. Referent power which is entirely
dependent on those who follow. Lastly, integrated power is gained from one’s capacity to
bring others together.
Power is vital in the political arena. There have been cases where novices have inherited
enormous authority as they were born as the child or grandchild member of a
constitutional monarch. Army leaders have also been able to seize control of
administrations by force or by attempting a coup.
What is Leadership?
A leader is a successful individual who sets a vision, encourages others to work toward that
vision, educates and forms the team that will spearhead the fulfillment of the aspiration,
and oversees the vision’s final delivery.
Some of the types of leadership are autocratic leadership that is characterized by the
leader’s complete accountability and ownership over his or her subordinates. Democratic
leadership, which entails including employees in decision-making. and finally,
transformational leaders are the style of leadership that is focused on starting some sort of
reform.
With each degree of advancement or position, every leader gains a proportionate amount
of inherent authority. The capacity to generate devoted followers is a characteristic shared
by all excellent leaders.
1. Power is defined as the ability to exercise control over others and leadership is
defined as the ability to inspire others without coercion.
2. People in power need not to always be credible but leaders need to be credible.
3. A stance of authority confers power, whereas leadership is a human trait.
4. Power can be coercive, legitimate, or referent, while leadership can be autocratic,
democratic, transformative, or dynastic.
5. Power is not dependent on leadership, but effective leadership need power.
Conclusion
Power and leadership are inextricably related ideas. Power is defined as the capacity to
influence people. Leaders utilize power to achieve collective goals and understanding how
power works in an organization improves your ability to be a successful leader. A good
leader can be characterized in a variety of ways.
The lines that separate the concepts of power and leadership are frequently determined by
the sort of power utilized in conjunction with various leadership styles. Most leadership
and management positions include some form of power. The main idea is to detect it and
utilize the appropriate combination without jeopardizing the purpose or intended goal.
Explain Managerial Communication – Barriers, process & Forms.
Managerial communication is the process by which a manager in an organization
shares ideas or information with other managers or members of their team.
Depending on how well it is done managerial communication has a great impact on the
staff morale, the achievement of company goals, and organizational culture.
Managers in an organization need to not only be skilled in their job but also in their
communication abilities. Lack of the latter may lead them not to have good relations with
fellow employees and managers and proper authorization may not be established.
Communications is a continuous process that mainly involves three elements viz. sender,
message, and receiver. The elements involved in the communication process are explained
below in detail:
1. Sender
The sender or the communicator generates the message and conveys it to the receiver. He is
the source and the one who starts the communication
2. Message
It is the idea, information, view, fact, feeling, etc. that is generated by the sender and is then
intended to be communicated further.
3. Encoding
The message generated by the sender is encoded symbolically such as in the form of words,
pictures, gestures, etc. before it is being conveyed.
4. Media
It is the manner in which the encoded message is transmitted. The message may be transmitted
orally or in writing. The medium of communication includes telephone, internet, post, fax, e-
mail, etc. The choice of medium is decided by the sender.
5. Decoding
It is the process of converting the symbols encoded by the sender. After decoding the message
is received by the receiver.
6. Receiver
He is the person who is last in the chain and for whom the message was sent by the sender.
Once the receiver receives the message and understands it in proper perspective and acts
according to the message, only then the purpose of communication is successful.
7. Feedback
Once the receiver confirms to the sender that he has received the message and understood it,
the process of communication is complete.
8. Noise
It refers to any obstruction that is caused by the sender, message or receiver during the process
of communication. For example, bad telephone connection, faulty encoding, faulty decoding,
inattentive receiver, poor understanding of message due to prejudice or inappropriate
gestures, etc.
Barriers of Communication
A skilled communicator needs to have information about the different types of barriers to
effective communication and try to prevent them. These barriers to effective communication
can be overcome by active listening, reflection, etc. The communicator must seek feedback
from the receiver of the information to check if the message was understood in its true sense.
Listed below are some of the common barriers to effective communication.
1. Using Jargon:
If one uses unfamiliar terms or over-complicated technical terms, it could not be
understood well.
3. Perception Difference:
If two people see things differently then their viewpoints might come in the way of
deciphering the message correctly.
4. Physical Disabilities:
If the receiver has hearing problems, or the speaker has speech disabilities, then
communication will not be effective. It will distort the message.
5. Emotional Barriers:
Sensitive topics make it difficult for the speaker or the receiver to engage properly in
the communication exchange. It could also be that some people are not comfortable
expressing themselves; hence their words might not reflect the true meaning of what
they want to convey. Topics that may be taboo or off-limits for some people are
politics, religion, mental or physical disabilities, racism, sexuality, and any other
unpopular options.
8. Language Difference:
The difference in dialects of different regions or unfamiliar accents can make it
difficult to understand the message sent.
9. Prejudices:
Most people have preconceived notions about many things; hence they hear only
what they want to listen to, not what is being said. These false assumptions and
stereotyping lead to barriers in communication.
OR
Managers need to interact with each other as well as with their team members on a regular
basis not only to get things done effectively but also to ensure peace at the workplace.
Effective communication at all levels within an organization helps resolve problems within
the desired time frame.
It is essential for managers to communicate with their team members and vice a versa to
ensure maximum productivity and peace at workplace.
If you want to learn more about forms of communication, you don’t need to look too far.
Different types of communication skills can be easily observed in the workplace itself. The
way you interact with your colleagues will be different from the way you communicate
with, say, the CEO of the organization. From the way you hold yourself when giving a
presentation to how you write an email also constitutes different types of communication.
Let’s answer the question, “what are the types of communication skills?” to get a better
understanding. Explore the forms of communication and different types of skills below:
1. VERBAL COMMUNICATION
Do you know that communication and productivity are interlinked? Every successful
organization instills a culture of effective verbal communication. Verbal communication
helps deliver messages quickly. It helps employees receive clear directions and rewards
good performance with prompt appreciation. All this boosts the morale and, hence, the
productivity of employees.
Remember the attendant at your bank branch who gives clear instructions, and is calm,
patient, and supportive. That’s because she possesses excellent verbal communication
skills. You can improve your verbal communication skills by developing active listening
skills and confident body language. You can learn the ABC (affective, behavioral, and
cognitive) of active listening by taking Harappa Education’s Listening Actively course.
2. NONVERBAL COMMUNICATION
Have you ever watched a Kathakali performance? This classical Indian dance form portrays
mythological stories. The performance embodies three types of characters: the virtuous,
those with grey shades and those who are evil. These characteristics are expressed through
postures, gestures, and facial expressions.
Nonverbal communication delivers a message without the use of words. Nonverbal cues
through body language, facial expressions, and tone of voice are given and interpreted in
this form of communication. A shrug of the shoulders could indicate indifference while
waving of hands could be enough to say goodbye and a simple nod may show acceptance.
3. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION
Written communication is one of the most trusted types of communication. Emails,
business letters, project proposals, blogs, books, brochures, and websites are examples of
written communication. This type of communication can be edited, revised, and changed to
optimize quality. It can also be kept as a record or proof for further reference.
Enrolling in Harappa Education’s Writing Proficiently course that teaches the SCQR
(Situation, Complication, Question, and Resolution) Storytelling Framework can help you
master the art of storytelling in your written communication.
4. VISUAL COMMUNICATION
Visual communication is a graphic representation of ideas. Visuals are created with the
help of art, drawings, sketches, charts, graphs, infographics, or videos.
Remember the superhit Amul advertising campaign? One of the longest-running creative
campaigns, it is an excellent example of visual communication. The Amul Girl is much-loved
and the tagline ‘Utterly Butterly Delicious’ is an all-time hit. Over the years, Amul ads have
commented on social issues, politics, global affairs, films, sports, and other topics with ease.
5. FORMAL COMMUNICATION
A business meeting, a legal document, a real estate agreement, and an appointment letter
are all examples of formal communication. Formal communication is done through defined
channels backed by certain organizational procedures. Formal language and the use of
jargon are hallmarks of this type of communication. The communication usually follows a
predefined format or structure.
These are some advantages of formal communication:
It streamlines processes saving you time and effort that would’ve been spent if you
communicated over text
It increases work efficiency because everyone’s on the same page about work that
needs to be done
It creates documented records because it’s essential to have a paper trail for
important tasks
It reaches the target audience in time without the message being filtered or
something getting left out
These are the different types of communication skills you’ll need in the workplace. Active
listening and storytelling are some other skills that can help you streamline and establish
communication processes. Whatever the form of communication, what you need to keep in
mind is the purpose of your communication, your audience and your message. An in-depth
analysis into what you’ll be communicating and how will help you streamline your process.