Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PII: S0045-2068(20)31836-8
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104538
Reference: YBIOO 104538
Please cite this article as: T.M. Dhameliya, K.I. Patel, R. Tiwari, S. Krishna Vagolu, D. Panda, D. Sriram, A.K.
Chakraborti, Design, Synthesis, and Biological Evaluation of Benzo[d]imidazole-2-carboxamides as New Anti-
TB Agents, Bioorganic Chemistry (2020), doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.104538
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such as the addition of a cover
page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is not yet the definitive version of record. This version
will undergo additional copyediting, typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are
providing this version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production process, errors
may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
Agents
Tejas M. Dhameliya,a Kshitij I. Patel,a Rishu Tiwari,b Siva Krishna Vagolu,c Dulal Panda,b
Research (NIPER), Sector 67, S.A.S. Nagar 160 062, Punjab, India.
bDepartment of Biosciences & Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai
akchakraborti@rediffmail.com.
1
Graphical Abstract
N O
N HN R1
(L)
Benzo[d]imidazole-2-carboxamides
as new anti-TB chemotypes
13 Anti-mycobacterial Hits with MIC 0.78-6.25 µg/mL
Non-cytotoxic (RAW 264.7 cell lines)
2
Highlights
Research (NIPER), Sector 67, S.A.S. Nagar 160 062, Punjab, India.
§Department of Biosciences & Bioengineering, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay, Mumbai
3
Abstract
Tuberculosis is the leading cause of death globally among infectious diseases. Due to the
the TB-HIV synergism the urgent need to develop novel anti-mycobacterial agents has been
realized. The drug-to-target path has been the successful strategy for new anti-TB drug
development. All the six drug candidates that have shown promise during the clinical trials and
some of these being approved for treatment against MDR TB are the results of phenotype screening
class that could be subjected to whole cell assay to generate new anti-TB leads the
design was based on the identification of the benzimidazole ring as a prominent substructure of
the FDA approved drugs, the structural analysis of reported anti-TB benzimidazoles, and the
Twenty seven final compounds have been prepared via NH4Cl-catalyzed amidation of ethyl
procedure. All of the synthesised target compounds were assessed for anti-TB potential using
H37Rv ATCC27294 strain. Thirteen compounds were found with better MIC (0.78-6.25 µg/mL)
than the standard drugs and being non-cytotoxic nature (< 50% inhibition against RAW 264.7 cell
lines at 50 µg/mL). The compound 8e exhibited best anti-TB activity (MIC: 2.15 µM and
selectivity index: > 60) and a few others e.g., 8a, 8f, 8k and 8o are the next best anti-TB hits (MIC:
1.56 µg/mL). The determination and analysis of various physiochemical parameters revealed favorable
druglike properties of the active compounds. The compounds 8a-l and 8o, with MIC values of ≤ 6.25
4
μg/mL, have high LipE values (10.66-11.77) that are higher than that of the suggested value of >
6 derived from empirical evidence for quality drug candidates and highlight their therapeutic
potential. The highest LipE value of 11.77 of the best active compound 8e with the MIC of 0.78
μg/mL indicates its better absorption and clearance as a probable clinical candidate for anti-TB
5
Introduction
Tuberculosis (TB) has led to an estimated death of around 1.2 million among human immuno-
deficiency virus (HIV) positive people in 2018 [1] and is the second leading cause of deaths among
the infectious diseases [2]. Despite the advances in the understanding of Mycobacterium
tuberculosis (Mtb) since its discovery [3] it remains a challenging task to treat TB with its high
death toll. Various types of TB affecting kidney, brain, lungs, etc. are known but the mycobacteria
mainly affect the lungs because Mtb being aerobic mycobacteria acquires plenty of oxygen from
the lungs. Due to newly emerging types of TB such as multi-, extensively- and totally drug-
resistant TB i.e., MDR-TB, XDR-TB, and TDR-TB, respectively, the directly observed treatment
short therapy (DOTS) with the first line anti-TB drugs isoniazid (INH), rifampin (RIF), ethambutol
(EMB), and pyrazinamide (PZA), is inadequate to fight with this deadly disease [4-7]. Bedaquiline
recommended by United States Food and Drug Administration (USFDA) [8] and delamanid
approved by European Medical Agency (EMEA) [9] for treatment of MDR-TB have shown cases
of resistance [10]. However, bedaquiline and delamanid cause hepatotoxicity [11,12] and CNS
toxicity [13], respectively, apart from QT prolongation. The long-term treatment with bedaquiline
has been reported to be associated with cardiac arrhythmia as the serious side effects leading to
mortality [14]. Recently (August 2019), USFDA has approved pretomanid, a nitroimidazopyran
derivative, in conjunction with bedaquiline and linezolid for XDR-TB or MDR-TB to treat adult
TB patients [15].
However, DOTS (the commonly recommended protocol for treatment against TB) is not
effective in recovery of the tuberculotic patients due to the adaptive nature of Mtb. Because of the
worsening situation of tuberculosis, there has been strong need for development of new anti-
tubercular agents. The poor chemotherapeutics, cross-resistance, and scarcity of the effective anti-
6
TB drugs emphasize the necessity for search of novel anti-tuberculotic agents that might have
Design
The drug discovery program for TB involves two approaches: drug-to-target and target-to-drug
[16]. The former strategy i.e., drug-to-target has been proved to be successful as it led to the
discovery of bedaquiline (TMC207) (Figure 1) as highly potent and innovative anti-TB agent [17]
that has recently been approved as drug candidate with a hope to cure MDR-TB [8]. Several other
candidates such as the nitroimidazoles delamanid (OPC67683) [18,19] and pretomanid (PA-824)
[20], imidazopyridine amide (Q203) [21], diethylamine compound SQ109 [22], and
benzothiazinone (BTZ043) [23] that proved to be promising anti-TB drugs in the clinical trials and
some of them being approved (e.g., pretomanid and delamanid) for treatment of MDR TB are out
of the drug-to-target approach initiated by assessment of their anti-TB potential in whole-cell [24].
The strength and success story of phenotype screening is not limited to infectious diseases,
particularly TB, and extends to the discovery of various other therapeutics agents starting from
aspirin to the 1,4-dihydropyridines (e.g., nifedipine, nicardipine and nimodipine), verapamil, and
ezetimibe [27,28] now known as NPC1L1 cholesterol transporter. All these demonstrate the
to be a reliable tool and renewed approach for new drug discovery [29] in the early stage for
7
infectious diseases [30] especially in tuberculosis [31-33] as it is physiologically more relevant
and less artificial due to the use of intact cells and their native environments. Thus, in the present
effort in finding novel anti-TB agents it was planned to follow the phenotype screening path.
For selection of compounds that would be put to phenotype screening we focused in designing
a new pharmacophore for anti-TB activity. For this purpose, we took into consideration the various
structural diversity that are present in drug candidate molecules. We were attracted by the fact that
about 59% of the drug candidates possess N-containing heterocyclic ring [34] with the prominent
present of the fused ring system the benzimidazole moiety [35] being fifteenth in the list of FDA
approved drugs and pharmaceuticals [36]. Thus, we considered the benzimidazole moiety as the
core of our new anti-TB pharmacophore and were encouraged by literature reports on the anti-
mycobacterial activity of various benzimidazole-based compounds [37 – 47] (Figure 2). To design
a novel pharmacophore with the benzimidazole heterocyclic ring we analysed the structural
features of these benzimidazole derivatives in correlation with the anti-TB activity that revealed
the following:
(motifs B-H) [38 – 47] except motif A [37] that bears the C-2 hetero (thio) substitution
(Figure 2).
ii) Among the C-2 alkyl/cycloalkyl/aryl substituted benzo[d]imidazoles (motifs B-H) the
1,2-disubstituted derivatives showed better anti-TB activity (e.g., motifs E and G) [44,
46].
8
iii) Though the compound of motif E exhibited the best anti-TB activity, the other two
compounds with comparable anti-TB potential are the 1,2-disubstituted analog of motif
G [46] and the C-2 cycloalkyl substituted under motif D [42] that bear electron
withdrawing substituents (e.g., NO2 and sulfonamide groups in motif G and carbamate
iv) The presence of the electron withdrawing NO2 group in the compounds of motif A and
G that could be the major factor to attribute the anti-TB activity in these compounds,
however, could also be detrimental for further development as the nitro aryl features have
been considered being potentially mutagenic via DNA adduct formation and
methaemoglobinemia [48].
v) The devoid of cell viability studies in some of these cases (motifs A, F, and G) raises
concern whether the observed anti-TB activity could be due to the general cytotoxicity
of these compounds.
As a part of our on-going studies on further refinement of the anti-tubercular activity [49-52] we
novel anti-TB scaffold we took into consideration the prevalence of the benzimidazole core in
FDA approved drugs and the above structural analysis of the reported anti-TB benzimidazoles we
planned to transpose the 1,2-disubstituted benzo[d]imidazole moiety of motif E and the C-2
carboxamide substitution pattern from the bioisosteric motifs I-K to design the benzo[d]imidazole-
2-carboxamide motif (L) as novel anti-TB scaffold following the scaffold hopping strategy
9
benzimidazole core and the C-2 carboxamido function/linkage (present in the first line anti-TB
drugs such as INH, RIF, and PZA) as the electron withdrawing group.
aminothiophenol [53,56], however led to the formation of quinoxaline-3-one rather than the
We reasoned that the ease of simultaneous nucleophilic attack of the amino groups of o-
phenylenediamine to the aldehyde and ester carbonyl groups in ethyl glyoxalate drives the reaction
to afford the quinoxaline-3-ones as the sole products. Thus, it was anticipated that decreasing the
nucleophilic character of one of the amino groups of o-phenylenediamine through substitution with
a sterically hindered group would resist the simultaneous nucleophilic attack on both of the
carbonyl groups of ethyl glyoxalate and would result in the desired benzo[d]imidazole-2-
carboxylate. Thus, we designed an alternate synthetic route for the target benzo[d]imidazole-2-
with ethyl glyoxalate (5) gave the benzimidazole-2-carboxylate (6). The “all water” synthetic
strategy reported from this laboratory [58] was adopted that involves water-assisted N-arylation of
o-fluoro nitrobenzene 1 with anilines (2) to form the o-N-mono-arylaminonitroaniline (3) followed
10
by nitro group reduction to generate 4 and in situ cyclocondensation with ethyl glyoxalate (5) to
form the desired benzo[d]imidazole-2-carboxylates (6) in one-pot. The reaction of 1 with aniline
(2a) and 4-chloroaniline (2b) underwent successfully for the synthesis of the corresponding ethyl
carboxylate was planned following the NH4Cl-catalyzed amidation protocol [54]. Thus the
equiv) in the presence of NH4Cl (20 mol%) at 100 °C under neat conditions afforded the
the reaction with various alicyclic amines 9 such as piperidine, morpholine, thiomorpholine, and
10) were tested against Mtb H37Rv (ATCC27294 strain) [59]. The anti-TB activity of 8, 10 and the
currently used anti-TB medicines like isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, pyrazinamide and
ciprofloxacin (INH, R, E, Z, and Cfx, respectively) are provided in Table 3. The compounds having
the generalized structure 8 and 10 showed MICs from 0.78 to >25 µg/mL Among these, 8e was
identified as the most active anti-mycobacterial compound (MIC: 2.15 µM; approx. selectivity
index: 60), and was found to be superior to the anti-TB medicines E, Z and Cfx (Table 3).
11
It is observed that final compounds/carboxamides (8a-l) have better anti-TB activity than that of
the starting carboxylate, e.g., 8a is eight folds more active than the intermediate 6a. This could be
attributed due to the fact that the lipophilicity (cLogP, Table 3, Entries 1-2), estimated using in
silico methods, in the final carboxamides is increased from 3.87 to 5.44 with the incorporation of
the benzylamine group as it is an important parameter in crossing the lipophilic mycobacterial cell
wall [61]. Although a direct co-relationship between the MIC and cLogP of the compounds
couldn’t be established, the data under Table 3 reveals that the compounds (8 and 10) are more
lipophilic in comparison with INH, E, and Z allowing their passage through the mycolic acid-rich
cell wall.
While addressing the lipophilicity in targeting any pathogenic disease, the lipophilic efficiency
(LipE) is considered as one of the most significant parameters [62-65]. As the LiPE [66] links
potency with lipophilicity capturing both the values in a single parameter it is considered as an
important physicochemical parameter in drug design and discovery for qualitative assessment of
druglikeness of investigational compounds [67,68]. The LipE (MIC) offers means to compare
compounds of different potencies (pIC50s) and lipophilicities (LogP) and can be mathematically
calculated by subtracting Log(MIC) from cLogP. Generally, at a given concentration, a high pIC50
value reflects reduced risk of non-specific, off-target pharmacology and is a desirable attribute in
drug candidates.
Compounds with distinct anti-TB activity have been found to be more lipophilic than the inactive
compounds [69] and within a drug class lipophilic compounds exhibit better anti-TB activity than
their hydrophilic counterparts [70-73]. The in silico estimation of the various physiochemical
revealed these to possess favourable Lipinski parameters [74] that demonstrate the druglike
12
character of these novel benzimidazoles. Generally, at a given concentration, a high pIC50 value
reflects reduced risk of non-specific, off-target pharmacology and is a desirable attribute in drug
candidates. A higher LipE value of drug candidates indicates better absorption and clearance
suggesting a probable clinical candidate for drug discovery. In view of empirical evidence
suggesting quality drug candidates to have a high LiPE (> 6) [75], the higher LipE values (10.66-
11.77) of the compounds 8a-l and 8o, with MIC ≤ 6.25 μg/mL highlight their therapeutic potential
and in particular for 8e the MIC of 0.78 μg/mL and LipE of 11.77 indicate its better absorption
Determination of Cytotoxicity
To eliminate the possibility of anti-tuberculotic potential of these compounds due to general
toxicity, the compounds with MIC ≤ 6.25 μg/mL were subjected for in vitro determination of
cytotoxicity against mouse leukemic monocyte macrophage (RAW 264.7) cell lines at 50 μg/mL.
(MTT) assay [76,77] has been summarized in Table 4. This study demonstrates the active anti-TB
hits to be non-cytotoxic with < 50% inhibition and 8e as the most potent compound with the
μg/mL) increases the activity by eight-fold in 8a (MIC 1.56 μg/mL) compared to the parent
compound. Upon incorporation of halogens such as fluorine and chlorine at ortho position of
phenyl ring, the anti-tubercular activity of 8b and 8g decreased slightly up to 3.125 μg/mL. Out of
the three tried difluoro substitutions such as 2,4-difluoro (8d), 3,4-difluoro (8e), and 2,5-difluoro
(8f), the highest anti-TB activity among these carboxamides has been observed with 8e (MIC of
13
0.78 μg/mL) bearing 3,4-difluoro substitutions devoid of any ortho steric clash. Four fold reduction
in anti-TB activity has been observed with incorporation of powerful electron withdrawing 4-
trifluoromethyl group in 8n (MIC 12.5 μg/mL) as compared to the parent compound 8a.
Incorporation of methyl at ortho position diminished the activity (8j, MIC 6.25 μg/mL) due to the
ortho steric clash of compared to the parent compound 8a. However, upon incorporation of
methoxy group at the same second position the activity is re-gained (8k, MIC 1.56 μg/mL) to the
same extent as that of parent compound 8a. However, this trend was found to be detrimental upon
incorporation of electron donating groups such as 2,4-di-methoxy (8l, MIC having 6.25 μg/mL)
and 3,4-di-methoxy (8m, MIC having >25 μg/mL) groups suggesting perhaps the presence of
strong electron releasing substituent at the 4/para positing of the phenyl ring of the amine would
amide/amine part by alicyclic amines such as morpholine (10a, MIC 12.5 μg/mL), thiomorpholine
(10b, MIC 25 μg/mL), piperidine (10c, MIC >25 μg/mL), and substituted piperazines (10d-h), led
arylalkyl groups of 8 for anti-mycobactericidal action. Increasing the size of the linker from n = 1
(8a, MIC 1.56 μg/mL) to n = 2 (8q, MIC 12.5 μg/mL), resulted decreased anti-TB activity of the
compounds suggesting that the ethyl spacer is detrimental to anti-TB potential of these compounds.
3. Conclusions
The benzimidazole-2-carboxamide moiety has been designed as novel anti-TB scaffold. The
14
methodology has been adopted for the construction of the ethyl benzo[d]imidazole-2-carboxylates,
cyclocondensation (with ethyl glyoxalate). All the final carboxamides were tested for anti-
mycobacterial activity in vitro against Mtb H37Rv (ATCC27294 strain). The compound 8e
exhibited the best anti-tubercular potential [MIC: 0.78 μg/mL (2.15 µM); selectivity (approx.)
index: > 64] and 8a, 8f, 8k and 8o are the next best compounds with MIC of 1.56 µg/mL. The
active anti-TB hits with MIC ≤ 6.25 µg/mL are non cytotoxic against RAW 264.7 cell lines. The
active compounds possess favourable physiochemical properties, specifically with respect to the
the LipE values (10.66 - 10.77) which are higher than that of the empirically derived value of > 6
for quality drug candidates demonstrating their drug likeliness. These results can be considered as
4. Experimental Section
4.1 General Chemistry
Reagents and solvents have been procured from Alfa Aesar, Aldrich, Fluka, Merck AG,
and S-D Fine Chemicals and used as such. 1H and 13C NMR spectra has been generated at 400 and
100 MHz respectively with tetra methyl silane as an internal standard and using deuteriated
characterization of the NMR spectra, following abbreviation: singlet (s); multiplet (m); doublet
(d); doublet of doublet (dd); triplet (t); quartet (q) and broad singlet (br s). MS has been determined
using the atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) mode with LCMS and on GCMS using
electron impact (EI) mode. IR spectra have been obtained using Perkin Elmer FTIR
spectrophotometer in the range of 4000-600 cm-1. Silica gel GF-254 was used for checking the
purity of the compounds and TLCs were visualized under UV (254 nm). Melting point apparatus
15
(Gupta Scientific) was used for recording the melting points. Buchi rotary evaporator has been
used for evaporation of solvent under reduced pressure. HPLC spectra of carboxamides have been
recorded using C18 column (4.6 × 250 mm, 5 micron), 70:30 of acetonitrile:water as eluent at 30
ºC by sampling of 20 µL with 1 mL/min (flow rate), and PDA detector. Elemental analyses of the
novel compounds have been obtained using organic element analyzer. The results of elemental
analysis summarized have been found in suitable range (± 0.4 % of calculated values).
The mixture of 1 (141 mg, 1 mmol) and 2 (1 equiv) in water (2 mL) was stirred magnetically under
reflux (oil bath, 110 ℃) for 2 h (TLC shows complete consumption of starting materials). To this
mixture was added 2 N aq. HCl (2.5 mL, 5 equiv) and indium powder (287 mg, 2.5 equiv) and the
resultant mixture was stirred magnetically for 2 h. Next, 5 (204 mg, 2 mmol, 2 equiv) was added
to this reaction mixture and the magnetic stirring was continued for another 1 h. The reaction
mixture was cooled to rt and treated with solid NaHCO3 (~ 140 mg) to neutralize (ceasing of
effervescence) the acid. The reaction mixture was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 5 mL), the combined
EtOAc extracts were dried (anh MgSO4), and filtered through a cotton plug. The filtrate was
concentrated in vacuo and the crude product was subjected to column chromatography purification
on silica gel G (230–400) using (hexane:EtOAc, 85:15) as the eluent to afford analytically pure 6.
mp 256-260 °C; IR (KBr, cm-1) 3045, 2925, 2853, 1718, 1599, 1488, 1286, 1184, 1027; 1H NMR
(400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.00-7.98 (m, 1H), 7.61-7.56 (m, 3H), 7.43-7.36 (m, 4H), 7.19-7.16 (m, 1H),
4.39 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.36 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.1, 141.7,
141.3, 137.6, 136.5, 129.4, 129.1, 127.3, 126.0, 124.1, 121.8, 111.4, 62.2, 14.1.
16
Ethyl 1-(4-chlorophenyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-2-carboxylate (6b): Pale yellow oil (189 mg,
63%). IR (KBr, cm-1) 3043, 2922, 2851, 1717, 1578, 1462, 1280, 1179, 1023; 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 8.00-7.98 (m, 1H), 7.56 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 7.44-7.40 (m, 2H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H),
7.17-7.15 (m, 1H), 4.41 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 1.40 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 159.1, 141.7, 141.0, 137.4, 135.2, 135.0, 129.7, 128.6, 126.3, 124.3, 121.9, 111.2, 62.4, 14.2.
HRMS (APCI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ Calcd for C16H14ClN2O2 301.0744; Found 301.0641.
The ester (6a, 267 mg, 1 mmol) was treated with the amine (1 equiv) in the presence of NH4Cl
(20 mol%) under magnetic stirring at 100 ºC till consumption of 6a (TLC). The reaction mixture
was cooled at rt and extracted with EtOAc (4 × 5 mL). The combined EtOAc extracts were dried
(anh Na2SO4), filtered through a plug of cotton, and the filtrate was concentrated in vaccuo. The
crude product was subjected to column chromatography purification on silica gel G (60-120 mesh)
94%). mp 156-160 °C; IR (KBr, cm-1) 3281, 3073, 2917, 1667, 1610, 1541, 1500, 1095, 860; 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.02 (s, 1H), 7.84-7.82 (m, 1H), 7.62-7.54 (m, 3H), 7.45-7.28 (m, 9H),
7.20-7.18 (m, 1H), 4.60 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, MeOD) δ 159.6, 144.8, 141.0,
138.0, 136.9, 136.2, 129.2, 128.7, 128.2, 127.3, 127.0, 126.6, 125.1, 123.7, 120.0, 111.0, 42.7;
HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + Na]+ Calcd for C21H17N3ONa 350.1269; Found 350.1260. HPLC
(273 mg, 79%). IR (KBr, cm-1) 3078, 2941, 1721, 1515, 1487, 1267, 1071, 717; 1H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.16-8.13 (m, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 7.5 Hz, 1H), 7.57-7.51 (m, 3H), 7.40-7.31 (m, 5H),
17
7.25-7.21 (m, 1H), 7.15 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 7.09-7.01 (m, 2H), 4.62 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 162.3, 159.8, 158.5, 143.5, 141.0, 138.0, 136.6, 130.3, 130.2, 129.5, 129.4,
129.3, 129.0, 127.3, 125.3, 124.8, 124.7, 124.3, 124.3, 124.0, 120.6, 115.6, 115.4, 111.6, 37.3.
Anal. Calcd for C21H16FN3O Elemental Analysis: C, 73.03; H, 4.67; N, 12.17; Found: C, 73.05;
H, 4.68; N, 12.18. HPLC analysis: retention time = 5.808 min; peak area, 100%.
mg, 82%). IR (KBr, cm-1) 3038, 2921, 1716, 1592, 1481, 1281, 1028, 699; 1H NMR (400 MHz,
CDCl3) δ 8.20 (br s, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.61-7.54 (m, 3H), 7.44-7.30 (m, 6H), 7.20 (d,
J = 7.8 Hz, 2H), 7.02 (t, J = 8.6 Hz, 2H), 4.56 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ
163.5, 161.0, 158.4, 143.5, 141.0, 138.0, 136.6, 133.5, 133.5, 129.7, 129.7, 129.3, 129.0, 127.3,
125.3, 124.0, 120.5, 115.7, 115.5, 111.6, 42.6. Anal. Calcd for C21H16FN3O Elemental Analysis:
C, 73.03; H, 4.67; N, 12.17; Found: C, 73.00; H, 4.68; N, 12.20. HPLC analysis: retention time =
solid (247 mg, 68%). mp 96-98 °C; IR (KBr, cm-1) 3285, 3071, 2921, 1671, 1617, 1545, 1505,
1096, 861; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.03 (br s, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.59-7.55 (m,
3H), 7.43-7.35 (m, 5H), 7.18 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 6.88-6.81 (m, 2H), 4.61 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H); 13C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.5, 143.3, 141.0, 141.0, 138.0, 136.6, 131.2, 131.2, 131.1, 131.1,
129.3, 129.0, 127.2, 125.3, 124.0, 120.8, 120.8, 120.7, 120.7, 120.6, 111.6, 111.5, 111.3, 111.3,
104.2, 104.0, 36.7. Anal. Calcd for C21H15F2N3O Elemental Analysis: C, 69.41; H, 4.16; N, 11.56;
Found: C, 69.39; H, 4.12; N, 11.53. HPLC analysis: retention time = 7.042 min; peak area, 100%.
(243 mg, 67%). mp 110-112 °C; IR (KBr, cm-1) 3288, 2963, 1722, 1671, 1598, 1499, 1404, 1262,
18
799; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.24 (br s, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 7.59-7.56 (m, 3H),
7.44-7.38 (m, 4H), 7.21-7.17 (m, 2H), 7.15-7.11 (m, 2H), 7.08-7.07 (m, 1H), 4.54 (d, J = 6.3 Hz,
2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.5, 148.5, 143.3, 140.9, 138.0, 136.5, 134.9, 134.9, 134.8,
129.4, 129.3, 129.1, 129.0, 127.2, 125.4, 124.1, 123.8, 123.8, 123.8, 123.7, 120.5, 117.5, 117.3,
116.9, 116.8, 111.7, 111.5, 42.3. Anal. Calcd for C21H15F2N3O Elemental Analysis: C, 69.41; H,
4.16; N, 11.56; Found: C, 69.39; H, 4.13; N, 11.55. HPLC analysis: retention time = 6.875 min;
(283 mg, 78%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.14 (br s, 1H), 7.85 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.61-7.54
(m, 3H), 7.44-7.35 (m, 4H), 7.19 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.13-6.93 (m, 3H), 4.63 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H);
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.6, 157.5, 154.6, 143.2, 141.0, 138.0, 136.5, 129.3, 129.0,
127.2, 125.4, 124.1, 120.6, 116.5, 116.3, 115.5, 115.4, 111.6, 36.9; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M +
K]+ Calcd for C21H15F2KN3OK 402.0820; Found 402.0811. HPLC analysis: retention time = 7.008
mg, 73%). mp 108-110 °C; IR (KBr, cm-1) 3401, 3060, 2089, 1681, 1596, 1531, 1447, 746; 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.14 (br s, 1H), 7.85 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.59-7.54 (m, 3H), 7.42-7.37
(m, 4H), 7.28-7.24 (m, 4H), 7.19 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 4.71 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100
MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.4, 142.4, 140.0, 137.0, 135.6, 134.1, 133.3, 132.7, 128.9, 128.6, 128.2, 127.9,
126.2, 126.1, 124.2, 122.9, 119.6, 110.6, 40.7. Anal. Calcd for C21H16ClN3O Elemental Analysis:
C, 69.71; H, 4.46; N, 11.61; Found: C, 69.69; H, 4.45; N, 11.62. HPLC analysis: retention time =
19
N-(3-Chlorobenzyl)-1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-2-carboxamide (8h): Pale yellow oil
(293 mg, 81%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.56 (t, J = 6.1 Hz, 1H), 7.83-7.81 (m, 1H), 7.59-
7.56 (m, 3H), 7.46-7.43 (m, 2H), 7.41-7.34 (m, 3H), 7.25-7.20 (m, 4H), 4.56 (d, J = 6.2 Hz, 2H);
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.6, 143.5, 141.0, 140.0, 138.0, 136.6, 134.5, 129.9, 129.3,
129.0, 127.9, 127.7, 127.3, 126.0, 125.4, 124.1, 120.6, 111.7, 42.7. Anal. Calcd for C21H16ClN3O
Elemental Analysis: C, 69.71; H, 4.46; N, 11.61; Found: C, 69.70; H, 4.47; N, 11.60. HPLC
mg, 76%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.17 (br s,1H), 7.70 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.48-7.43 (m,
3H), 7.31-7.22 (m, 4H), 7.19-7.13 (m, 4H), 7.07 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 4.42 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H); 13C
NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.5, 143.5, 141.0, 138.0, 136.6, 136.3, 133.4, 129.3, 129.3, 129.0,
128.8, 127.3, 125.4, 124.0, 120.5, 111.6, 42.6. Anal. Calcd for C21H16ClN3O Elemental Analysis:
C, 69.71; H, 4.46; N, 11.61; Found: C, 69.70; H, 4.46; N, 11.60. HPLC analysis: retention time =
mg, 76%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.73-7.71 (m, 2H), 7.50-7.43 (m, 3H), 7.33 (d, J = 6.6
Hz, 2H), 7.29-7.22 (m, 3H), 7.12-7.08 (m, 4H), 4.49 (d, J = 5.7 Hz, 2H), 2.27 (s, 3H); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.3, 143.5, 141.1, 138.0, 136.7, 136.6, 135.2, 130.6, 129.3, 128.9, 128.7,
127.9, 127.3, 126.3, 125.2, 123.9, 120.6, 111.6, 41.6, 19.1. Anal. Calcd for C22H19N3O Elemental
Analysis: C, 77.40; H, 5.61; N, 12.31. Found: C, 77.38; H, 5.63; N, 12.32. HPLC analysis:
(300 mg, 84%). mp 110-112 °C; IR (KBr, cm-1) 3037, 2921, 1713, 1597, 1481, 1285, 1021, 699;
20
1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.17 (br s, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.60-7.52 (m, 3H), 7.44-
7.27 (m, 6H), 7.18 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.95-6.91 (m, 2H), 4.62 (d, J = 6.1 Hz, 2H), 3.92 (s, 3H);
13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.2, 157.7, 143.9, 141.1, 138.0, 136.8, 129.8, 129.2, 129.0,
128.8, 127.3, 125.7, 125.1, 123.8, 120.6, 120.5, 111.6, 110.4, 55.4, 39.1. Anal. Calcd for
C22H19N3O2 Elemental Analysis: C, 73.93; H, 5.36; N, 11.76. Found: C, 73.90; H, 5.34; N, 11.77.
(318 mg, 82%). mp 177-179 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.06-8.03 (m, 1H), 7.84 (d, J = 7.7
Hz, 1H), 7.60-7.53 (m, 3H), 7.43-7.32 (m, 5H), 7.23 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.17 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H),
6.49 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 6.44 (dd, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 4.53 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H), 3.89 (s, 3H), 3.82 (s,
3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 160.7, 158.8, 158.1, 144.0, 141.1, 138.0, 136.8, 130.6, 129.2,
128.8, 127.3, 125.0, 123.8, 120.5, 118.3, 111.5, 103.9, 98.6, 55.5, 38.6; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z:
[M + H]+ Calcd for C23H22N3O3 388.1661; Found 388.1655. HPLC analysis: retention time = 7.058
(294 mg, 76%). mp 165-168 °C; IR (KBr, cm-1) 3419, 2929, 1682, 1517, 1091, 746; 1H NMR (400
MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.82-7.80 (m, 2H), 7.58-7.50 (m, 3H), 7.39-7.34 (m, 3H), 7.16 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H),
6.82-6.71 (m, 4H), 3.86 (d, J = 1.0 Hz, 8H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.5, 149.0, 147.7,
143.7, 141.0, 138.0, 136.7, 131.2, 129.3, 128.9, 127.2, 125.2, 123.9, 120.7, 120.5, 112.0, 111.6,
111.4, 55.9, 40.7, 35.5. Anal. Calcd for C23H21N3O3 Elemental Analysis: C, 71.30; H, 5.46; N,
10.85. Found: C, 71.33; H, 5.47; N, 10.84. HPLC analysis: retention time = 5.833 min; peak area,
100%.
21
1-Phenyl-N-(4-(trifluoromethyl)benzyl)-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-2-carboxamide (8n): Pale
yellow oil (312 mg, 79%). IR (KBr, cm-1) 3041, 2923, 1711, 1594, 1481, 1281, 1025, 700; 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.30 (br s, 1H), 7.68 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.45-7.42 (m, 6H), 7.32-7.23
(m, 5H), 7.07-7.04 (m, 1H), 4.49 (d, J = 6.3 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.6, 143.4,
142.0, 140.9, 138.0, 138.0, 136.5, 129.4, 129.3, 129.0, 128.0, 127.3, 127.2, 126.0, 125.7, 125.6,
125.6, 125.5, 125.4, 124.1, 124.1, 121.8, 120.5, 111.7, 111.5, 42.8. Anal. Calcd for C22H16F3N3O
Elemental Analysis: C, 66.83; H, 4.08; N, 10.63; Found: C, 66.84; H, 4.09; N, 10.62. HPLC
mg, 76%). IR (KBr, cm-1) 3039, 2922, 1709, 1589, 1479, 1279, 1071. 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 7.99 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 7.7 Hz, 1H), 7.55-7.48 (m, 3H), 7.40-7.30 (m, 8H), 7.29-
7.23 (m, 1H), 7.14 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 5.25-5.18 (m, 1H), 1.60 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 3H); 13C NMR (100
MHz, CDCl3) δ 157.6, 143.7, 142.8, 141.0, 138.0, 136.6, 129.3, 128.9, 128.7, 127.4, 127.2, 126.2,
125.2, 123.9, 120.5, 111.6, 48.8, 22.1; HRMS (ESI-TOF) m/z: [M + H]+ Calcd for C22H19N3ONa
364.1426; Found 3364.1417. HPLC analysis: retention time = 7.292 min; peak area, 100%.
N-(Benzo[d][1,3]dioxol-5-ylmethyl)-1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-2-carboxamide (8p):
Yellow solid (301 mg, 81%). 124-126 °C; IR (KBr, cm-1) 3436, 2068, 1634, 1536, 1499, 1259,
1034, 751; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.31 (br s, 1H), 7.82 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 7.59-7.57 (m,
3H), 7.45-7.44 (m, 2H), 7.38-7.34 (m, 2H), 7.19 (d, J = 7.6 Hz, 1H), 6.82 (s, 1H), 6.76 (q, J = 7.4
Hz, 2H), 5.92 (s, 2H), 4.49 (d, J = 5.2 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.4, 147.9, 147.0,
143.7, 141.1, 138.0, 136.7, 131.6, 129.3, 129.0, 127.3, 125.2, 123.9, 121.4, 120.6, 111.6, 108.6,
108.3, 101.1, 43.2. Anal. Calcd for C22H17N3O3 Elemental Analysis: C, 71.15; H, 4.61; N, 11.31.
Found: C, 71.12; H, 4.60; N, 11.32. HPLC analysis: retention time = 11.267 min; peak area, 100%.
22
N-phenethyl-1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-2-carboxamide (8q): Pale yellow oil (283 mg,
83%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.84-7.82 (m, 2H), 7.61-7.55 (m, 4H), 7.44-7.33 (m, 5H),
7.18 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 6.85-6.82 (m, 1H), 6.79-6.78 (m, 2H), 3.64 (q, J = 6.9 Hz, 2H), 2.87 (t, J
= 7.2 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.5, 149.0, 147.7, 143.7, 141.0, 138.0, 136.7,
131.2, 129.3, 127.2, 125.2, 123.9, 120.7, 120.5, 111.9, 111.4, 40.8, 35.5. Anal. Calcd for
C22H19N3O Elemental Analysis: C, 77.40; H, 5.61; N, 12.31. Found: C, 77.38; H, 5.62; N, 12.33.
yellow oil (313 mg, 78%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.96-7.93 (m, 1H), 7.83 (d, J = 7.9 Hz,
1H), 7.60-7.52 (m, 3H), 7.41-7.32 (m, 4H), 7.18 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 3.88 (s, 6H), 3.65 (q, J = 6.9
Hz, 2H), 2.87 (q, J = 7.2 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 158.5, 149.0, 147.7, 143.8,
141.0, 137.9, 136.7, 131.2, 129.3, 128.9, 127.2, 125.2, 123.9, 120.7, 120.5, 112.0, 111.6, 111.4,
55.9, 55.9, 40.8, 35.4. Anal. Calcd for C24H23N3O3 Elemental Analysis: C, 71.80; H, 5.77; N,
10.47. Found: C, 71.79; H, 5.76; N, 10.48. HPLC analysis: retention time = 11.250 min; peak area,
100%.
(304 mg, 84%). mp 123-125 °C; IR (KBr, cm-1) 3395, 3062, 2922, 1678, 1533, 1495, 1266, 1090,
745; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.04 (s, 1H), 7.80 (d, J = 7.3 Hz, 1H), 7.53 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 3H),
7.40-7.27 (m, 9H), 7.15 (d, J = 7.4 Hz, 1H), 4.57 (d, J = 6.0 Hz, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 158.3, 143.4, 141.1, 137.8, 137.5, 135.1, 134.9, 129.6, 128.8, 128.7, 128.0, 127.7, 125.5, 124.2,
120.7, 111.3, 43.4. Anal. Calcd for C21H16ClN3O Elemental Analysis: C, 69.71; H, 4.46; N, 11.61.
Found: C, 69.73; H, 4.48; N, 11.62. HPLC analysis: retention time = 7.950 min; peak area, 100%.
23
Morpholino(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)methanone (10a): Yellowish oil (240 mg,
78%). IR (KBr, cm-1) 3413, 2924, 1642, 1598, 1500, 1435, 1388, 758; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 7.88-7.86 (m, 1H), 7.58-7.55 (m, 2H), 7.51 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 7.46-7.44 (m, 2H), 7.38-7.33 (m,
3H), 3.70-3.66 (m, 6H), 3.57-3.54 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.9, 145.2, 141.9,
135.6, 135.3, 129.8, 128.9, 126.1, 124.8, 123.6, 120.8, 110.9, 66.9, 66.6, 47.3, 42.4. Anal. Calcd
for C18H17N3O2 Elemental Analysis: C, 70.34; H, 5.58; N, 13.67. Found: C, 70.30; H, 5.56; N,
13.65. HPLC analysis: retention time = 4.692 min; peak area, 100%.
mg, 67%). IR (KBr, cm-1) 3434, 3058, 2961, 2927, 1730, 1650, 1597, 1500, 1447, 1212, 746; 1H
NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.90-7.88 (m, 1H), 7.60-7.53 (m, 4H), 7.48-7.46 (m, 2H), 7.36-7.35
(m, 2H), 3.97-3.95 (m, 2H), 3.86-3.83 (m, 2H), 2.64-2.60 (m, 2H), 2.57-2.54 (m, 2H); 13C NMR
(100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 160.2, 145.5, 141.8, 135.5, 135.2, 129.9, 129.0, 126.1, 124.7, 123.6, 120.8,
110.9, 49.5, 44.5, 28.1, 27.4. Anal. Calcd for C18H17N3OS Elemental Analysis: C, 66.85; H, 5.30;
N, 12.99. Found: C, 66.83 H, 5.29; N, 12.90. HPLC analysis: retention time = 4.750 min; peak
area, 100%.
75%). IR (KBr, cm-1) 3435, 2938, 1645, 1498, 1437, 1259, 1020, 761; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3)
δ 7.90-7.87 (m, 1H), 7.58-7.54 (m, 2H), 7.51-7.48 (m, 3H), 7.40-7.33 (m, 3H), 3.64-3.62 (m, 2H),
3.41-3.83 (m, 2H), 1.60-1.53 (m, 4H), 1.40-1.37 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 160.0,
146.5, 142.1, 135.5, 134.9, 129.8, 128.8, 125.9, 124.4, 123.4, 120.7, 110.8, 47.9, 42.9, 26.3, 25.3,
24.3. Anal. Calcd for C19H19N3O Elemental Analysis: C, 74.73; H, 6.27; N, 13.76. Found: C,
74.70; H, 6.25; N, 13.78. HPLC analysis: retention time = 5.225 min; peak area, 100%.
24
(4-Methylpiperazin-1-yl)(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)methanone (10d): Pale yellow
oil (285 mg, 89%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 8.16 (s, 1H), 7.92-7.90 (m, 1H), 7.59-7.54 (m,
5H), 7.38-7.35 (m, 2H), 4.14 (d, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.07 (s, 3H), 1.30-1.26 (m, 6H). 13C NMR (100
MHz, CDCl3) δ 171.2, 144.0, 142.3, 136.4, 133.7, 130.1, 128.1, 124.1, 123.7, 122.8, 120.6, 110.5,
60.4, 29.7, 21.1, 14.0. Anal. Calcd for Chemical Formula: C19H20N4O Elemental Analysis: C,
71.23; H, 6.29; N, 17.49. Found: C, 71.26; H, 6.30; N, 17.50. HPLC analysis: retention time =
(4-(2-Methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl)(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)methanone (10e):
Light brown solid (375 mg, 91%). mp 170-172 °C; IR (KBr, cm-1) 3401, 2916, 1642, 1594, 1524,
1496, 1243, 1021, 757; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.81 (d, J = 7 Hz, 1H), 7.51-7.47 (m, 2H),
7.43-7.40 (m, 3H), 7.28 (m, 2H), 6.98-6.94 (m, 1H), 6.86-6.78 (m, 4H), 3.82 (s, 2H), 3.78 (s, 3H),
3.69 (m, 2H), 2.94 (s, 2H), 2.84 (s, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 160.0, 152.2, 145.8, 142.1,
135.7, 135.1, 129.8, 128.9, 126.1, 124.6, 123.7, 123.5, 121.0, 120.9, 118.5, 111.3, 110.9, 55.4,
51.0, 50.5, 47.1, 42.2. Anal. Calcd for C25H24N4O2 Elemental Analysis: C, 72.80; H, 5.86; N,
13.58. Found: C, 72.79; H, 5.87; N, 13.60. HPLC analysis: retention time = 5.808 min; peak area,
100%.
(4-(4-Methoxyphenyl)piperazin-1-yl)(1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazol-2-yl)methanone (10f):
Brown solid (367 mg, 89%). mp 244-249 °C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.92-7.90 (m, 1H),
7.60-7.56 (m, 2H), 7.53-7.48 (m, 3H), 7.40-7.37 (m, 3H), 6.90-6.84 (m, 4H), 3.89-3.86 (m, 2H),
3.82-3.79 (m, 5H), 3.06-3.04 (m, 2H), 2.96-2.93 (m, 2H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.9,
154.5, 145.5, 145.1, 142.0, 135.7, 135.2, 129.8, 128.9, 126.1, 124.7, 123.5, 120.9, 119.1, 114.5,
110.9, 55.6, 51.4, 51.0, 47.0, 42.2. Anal. Calcd for Chemical Formula: C25H24N4O2 Elemental
25
Analysis: C, 72.80; H, 5.86; N, 13.58. Found: C, 72.78; H, 5.84; N, 13.56. HPLC analysis:
1-(4-(4-(1-Phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-2-carbonyl)piperazin-1-yl)phenyl)ethanone (10g):
Greenish yellow solid (293 mg, 69%). mp 182-185°C; 1H NMR (400 MHz, MeOD) δ 7.80-7.78
(m, 2H), 7.74-7.71 (m, 1H), 7.56-7.52 (m, 2H), 7.48-7.44 (m, 2H), 7.34-7.33 (m, 2H), 7.12 (d, J =
2.5 Hz, 2H), 6.91-6.85 (m, 2H), 3.72-3.70 (m, 2H), 3.54-3.51 (m, 2H), 3.29-3.27 (m, 2H), 3.15-
3.12 (m, 2H), 2.41 (s, 3H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, MeOD) δ 191.9, 154.2, 130.3, 129.9, 129.2,
129.2, 127.5, 126.0, 124.8, 123.9, 122.9, 122.9, 119.6, 111.6, 115.3, 113.7, 112.1, 110.9, 34.3,
30.8, 29.3, 28.7, 24.8. Anal. Calcd for Chemical Formula: C26H24N4O2 Elemental Analysis: C,
73.56; H, 5.70; N, 13.20. Found: C, 73.61; H, 5.69; N, 13.18. HPLC analysis: retention time =
yellow oil (373 mg, 79%). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.86-7.83 (m, 1H), 7.58-7.19 (m, 21H),
4.23 (m, 1H), 3.72-3.61 (m, 4H), 2.40-2.28 (m, 4H); 13C NMR (100 MHz, CDCl3) δ 159.8, 145.8,
142.0, 141.9, 135.7, 135.1, 130.1, 129.8, 128.6, 127.8, 127.2, 126.1, 124.1, 123.4, 120.8, 75.8,
52.0, 51.3, 47.1, 42.2. Anal. Calcd for C31H28N4O Elemental Analysis: C, 78.79; H, 5.97; N, 11.86.
Found: C, 78.76; H, 5.96; N, 11.84. HPLC analysis: retention time = 4.750 min; peak area, 100%.
Biological Evaluation
The protocol approved by NCCLS (National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards) for
estimation of minimum inhibitory concentration has been implemented for the determination of
susceptibility of compounds towards Mtb H37Rv ATCC 27294 strain [51]. Two-fold serial
dilutions in the range of 50.0, 25.0, 12.5, 6.25, 3.13, 1.56, 0.78, 0.4 µg/mL of carboxamides and
26
standard medicines have been made and treated with agar culture of Middlebrook 7H11 added
with oleic acid, albumin, dextrose, and catalase (OADC) growth supplements. To prepare the
inoculums of Mtb H37Rv ATCC 27294, Middlebrook 7H11 agar slants with OADC growth
supplements were used. Later it has been set to wet weight (1 mg/mL) in 0.05% of Tween 80,
saline diluted to 0.01 to yield ~ 107 colony forming units (CFU) per mL. A 5 μL of the suspension
was spiked into tubes of agar with ten times diluted compounds/mL and the tubes were incubated
at 37 ºC for four weeks and final results were recorded by performing the same experiment in
triplicates.
Determination of Cytotoxicity
The in vitro cytotoxicity of the anti-TB compounds (MIC ≤ 6.25 µg/mL) have been evaluated
carboxamides. The cell lines have been preserved at 37 ˚C in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator
(Thermo scientific). The adhered cells were detached followed by centrifugation to get the cell
pellet, which have been added with fresh media to count the cells using haemocytometer and plate
of 100 μL of media with cells ranging from 5,000-6,000 per well in a 96-well plate. The plate was
incubated overnight in the CO2 incubator for the cells to adhere and regain their shape. Later, cells
were treated with diluted media inoculated with 50 μg/mL of the test compounds to deduce the
percentage inhibition on normal cells followed by incubation of 48 h. Zero hour reading was noted
down with untreated cells and also control with 1% DMSO to subtract further from the 48 h
reading. Cells were treated by MTT dissolved in PBS (5 mg/mL) and incubated for 3-4 h at 37 ˚C.
The formazan crystals formed were dissolved in 100 μL of DMSO and the viability was measured
27
at 540 nm on a multimode reader (Spectra max). The values were further calculated for percentage
The selectivity index is defined as the ratio of 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) to minimum
inhibitory concentration (MIC99). Using MTT assay, the in vitro cell viability have been measured
at 50 µg/mL concentration of the potent anti-TB compounds with < 50% inhibition of cell lines
(Table 4). Thus, assuming IC50 for the target compounds ~ 50 µg/mL, the selectivity index has
been approximated.
Author Contributions
Notes
Acknowledgments
T.M.D. and A.K.C. thank Department of Pharmaceuticals (DoP), New Delhi for financial
assistance. D.P. thanks the Department of Science and Technology (DST), India for partial support
by a grant (EMR/2014/001047). R.T. thanks University Grants Commission (UGC), New Delhi
5. References
[1] World Health Organization (WHO). Global Tuberculosis Report; 2019.
28
https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/329368/9789241565714-eng.pdf?ua=1
[2] M. Raviglione, B. Marais, K. Floyd, K. Lönnroth, H. Getahun, G.B. Migliori, A.D. Harries,
[3] The Nobel Prize. The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1905.
2020).
[4] P.S. Jadhavar, M.D. Vaja, T.M. Dhameliya, A.K. Chakraborti, Oxazolidinones as Anti-
tubercular Agents : Discovery, Development and Future Perspectives, Curr. Med. Chem.
22 (2015) 4379–4397.
[5] K. Dheda, C.E. Barry 3rd, G. Maartens, Tuberculosis, Lancet 387 (2015) 1211–1226.
New drugs and perspectives for new anti-tuberculosis regimens, Pulmonology 24 (2018)
86–98.
[7] H.M.A. Hameed, M.M. Islam, C. Chhotaray, C. Wang, Y. Liu, Y. Tan, X. Li, S. Tan, V.
Delorme, W.W. Yew, J. Liu, T. Zhang, Molecular Targets Related Drug Resistance
29
[8] SIRTURO® Is the First Medication for Pulmonary MDR-TB With a Novel Mechanism of
[9] Otsuka Pharmaceutical Media Release. Otsuka Wins European Marketing Authorization
2020).
Acquired resistance to bedaquiline and delamanid in therapy for tuberculosis, New Eng. J.
https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2013/204671s000lbl.pdf (accessed
[12] M. V. Worley, S.J. Estrada, Bedaquiline: A novel antitubercular agent for the treatment of
[13] E. Harausz, H. Cox, M. Rich, C.D. Mitnick, P. Zimetbaum, J. Furin, QTc prolongation and
30
[15] FDA approves new drug for treatment-resistant forms of tuberculosis that affects the lungs,
(2019). https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-new-drug-
[16] C. Sala, R.C. Hartkoorn, Tuberculosis drugs: new candidates and how to find more. Future
[17] K. Andries, P. Verhasselt, J. Guillemont, H.W. Gohlmann, J.M. Neefs, H. Winkler, J. Van
promising action against tuberculosis in vitro and in mice, PLoS Med. 3 (2006) 2131-2144.
[20] C. K. Stover, P. Warrener, D.R. VanDevanter, D.R. Sherman, T.M. Arain, M.H.
Langhorne, S.W. Anderson, J.A. Towell, Y. Yuan, D.N. McMurray, B.N. Kreiswirth, C.E.
Barryk, W.R. Baker, A small-molecule nitroimidazopyran drug candidate for the treatment
31
[21] K. Pethe, P. Bifani, J. Jang, S. Kang, S. Park, S. Ahn, J. Jiricek, J. Jung, H. K. Jeon, J.
Lim, S. A. Yim, J. Nam, H. Kang, H. Kwon, C. –T. Oh, Y. Cho, Y. Jang, J. Kim, A. Chua,
Alonso, S. Lee, J. Kim, S. Oh, T. Oh, U. Nehrbass, S. J. Han, Z. No, J. Lee, P. Brodin, S.-
N. Cho, K. Nam, J. Kim, Discovery of q203, a potent clinical candidate for the treatment
974.
Dhar, M.R. Pasca, S. Buroni, A.P. Lucarelli, A. Milano, E.De Rossi, M. Belanova, A.
[24] B.E. Laughon, C.A. Nacy, Tuberculosis - drugs in the 2016 development pipeline. Nat.
32
[25] D.J. Triggle, Calcium antagonists. History and perspective. Stroke 21 (1990) IV49–IV58.
[26] D.J. Triggle, Calcium channel antagonists: clinical uses – past, present and future.
[27] M. Van Heek, C.F. France, D.S. Compton, R.L. McLeod, N.P. Yumibe, K.B. Alton, E.J.
absorption inhibitor, SCH58235, in the rat and rhesus monkey through the identification
of the active metabolites of SCH48461. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 283 (1997) 157–163.
[28] S.B. Rosenblum, T. Huynh, A. Afonso, H.R. Davis, N. Yumibe, J.W. Clader, D.A. Burnett,
Discovery of 1-(4-fluorophenyl)-(3R)-[3-(4-fluorophenyl)-(3S)-hydroxypropyl]-(4S)-(4 -
[29] W. Zheng, N. Thorne, J.C. McKew, Phenotypic screens as a renewed approach for drug
[30] D.J. Payne, M.N. Gwynn, D.J. Holmes, D.L. Pompliano, Drugs for bad bugs: confronting
the challenges of antibacterial discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 6 (2007) 29–40.
[31] N. Aulner, A. Danckaert, J.E. Ihm, D. Shum, S.L. Shorte, Next-Generation Phenotypic
Screening in Early Drug Discovery for Infectious Diseases, Trends Parasitol. 35 (2019)
357-370.
[32] A. Koul, E. Arnoult, N. Lounis, J. Guillemont, K. Andries, The challenge of new drug
33
[33] E.M. Grzelak, M.P. Choules, W. Gao, G. Cai, B. Wan, Y. Wang, J. B. McAlpine, J. Cheng,
Y. Jin, H. Lee, J.-W. Suh, G.F. Pauli, S.G. Franzblau, B.U. Jaki, S. Cho, Strategies in anti-
72 (2019) 719–728.
[34] J.S. Carey, D. Laffan, M.T. Williams, Analysis of the Reactions Used for the Preparation
[35] S.D. Roughley, A.M. Jordan, The Medicinal Chemist’s Toolbox: An Analysis of Reactions
[36] E. Vitaku, D.T. Smith, J.T. Njardarson, Analysis of the Structural Diversity, Substitution
40 (2005) 203–208.
(2015) 2112–2120.
34
[40] C. Raynaud, W. Daher, M.D. Johansen, F. Roquet-Banères, M. Blaise, O.K. Onajole, A.P.
[41] K. Kumar, D. Awasthi, S.-Y. Lee, I. Zanardi, B. Ruzsicska, S. Knudson, P.J. Tonge, R. a
Slayden, I. Ojima, Novel trisubstituted benzimidazoles, targeting Mtb FtsZ, as a new class
[42] D. Awasthi, K. Kumar, S.E. Knudson, R.A. Slayden, I. Ojima, SAR studies on
[43] B. Park, D. Awasthi, S.R. Chowdhury, E.H. Melief, K. Kumar, S.E. Knudson, R.A.
2602–2612.
Ovechkina, T. Masquelin, P. V. Desai, J.W. Cramer, P.A. Hipskind, J.O. Odingo, T. Parish,
58 (2015) 7273–7285.
[45] R. V. Shingalapur, K.M. Hosamani, R.S. Keri, Synthesis and evaluation of in vitro anti-
(2009) 4244–4248.
35
[46] P.K. Ranjith, P. Rajeesh, K.R. Haridas, N.K. Susanta, T.N. Guru Row, R. Rishikesan, N.
[47] V.K.A. Kalalbandi, J. Seetharamappa, U. Katrahalli, K.G. Bhat, Synthesis, crystal studies,
[48] V. Purohit, A.K. Basu, Mutagenicity of nitroaromatic compounds, Chem. Res. Toxicol. 13
(2000) 673–692.
[49] P.S. Jadhavar, T.M. Dhameliya, M.D. Vaja, D. Kumar, J.P. Sridevi, P. Yogeeswari, D.
26 (2016) 2663–2669.
[52] P.S. Jadhavar, K.I. Patel, T.M. Dhameliya, N. Saha, M.D. Vaja, V.S. Krishna, D. Sriram,
36
synthesis, and biological evaluation, Bioorg. Chem. 99 (2020)
10.1016/j.bioorg.2020.103774.
[53] P. Shah, T.M. Dhameliya, R. Bansal, M. Nautiyal, D.N. Kommi, P.S. Jadhavar, J.P.
[54] S. Pancholia, T.M. Dhameliya, P. Shah, P.S. Jadhavar, J.P. Sridevi, P. Yogeshwari, D.
Synthesis of 5-Amino-7-aryl-7,8-dihydro-[1,2,4]triazolo[4,3-a]-pyrimidine-6-
[57] T.M. Dhameliya, S.S. Chourasiya, E. Mishra, P.S. Jadhavar, P. V. Bharatam, A.K.
37
[58] D.N. Kommi, P.S. Jadhavar, D. Kumar, A.K. Chakraborti, “All-water” one-pot diverse
[61] E.C. Hett, E.J. Rubin, Bacterial Growth and Cell Division: A Mycobacterial Perspective
[62] J.J. Cui, M. Tran-Dube, H. Shen, M. Nambu, P.P. Kung, M. Pairish, L. Jia, J. Meng, L.
Edwards, Structure Based Drug Design of Crizotinib (Pf-02341066), a Potent and Selective
[63] T.W. Johnson, R.A. Gallego, M.P. Edwards, Lipophilic Efficiency as an Important Metric
[64] S. Planken, D.C. Behenna, S.K. Nair, T.O. Johnson, A. Nagata, C. Almaden, S. Bailey,
T.E. Ballard, L. Bernier, H. Cheng, S. Cho-Schultz, D. Dalvie, J.G. Deal, D.M. Dinh, M.P.
Edwards, R.A. Ferre, K.S. Gajiwala, M. Hemkens, R.S. Kania, J.C. Kath, J. Matthews,
B.W. Murray, S. Niessen, S.T.M. Orr, M. Pairish, N.W. Sach, H. Shen, M. Shi, J. Solowiej,
38
Luo, S. Xin, C. Zhang, J. Lafontaine, Discovery of N-((3R,4R)-4-Fluoro-1-(6-((3-methoxy-
1-methyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)amino)-9-methyl-9H-purin-2-yl)pyrrolidine-3-yl)acrylamide
[65] K.D. Freeman-Cook, R.L. Hoffman, T.W. Johnson, Lipophilic efficiency: the most
important efficiency metric in medicinal chemistry, Future Med. Chem. 5 (2013) 113–115.
Tran, M. F. Tutt, T. Young, Rapid assessment of a novel series of selective CB2 agonists
using parallel synthesis protocols: A Lipophilic Efficiency (LipE) analysis. Bioorg. Med.
[67] M.P. Edwards, D.A. Price. Role of physicochemical properties and ligand lipophilicity
efficiency in addressing drug safety risks. Ann. Rep. Med. Chem. 45 (2010) 381–391.
[68] P.D. Leeson, B. Springthorpe (November 2007). The influence of drug-like concepts on
[69] S. Ekins, J.S. Freundlich, I. Choi, M. Sarker, C. Talcott, Computational databases, pathway
and cheminformatics tools for tuberculosis drug discovery. Trends Microbiol. 19 (2011)
65–74.
[70] J. Mao, H. Yuan, Y. Wang, B. Wan, M. Pieroni, Q. Huang, R.B. van Breemen, A.P.
39
[71] A. Lilienkampf, M. Pieroni, S.G. Franzblau, W.R. Bishai, A.P. Kozikowski, Derivatives
(2012) 729–734.
Mycobacterium tuberculosis. A potent and selective series for further drug development.
[73] M. Pieroni, S.K. Tipparaju, S. Lun, Y. Song, A.W. Sturm, W.R. Bishai, A.P. Kozikowski.
334–342.
[74] C.A. Lipinski, F. Lombardo, B.W. Dominy, P.J. Feeney, Experimental and computational
[75] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lipophilic_efficiency#:~:text=LiPE%20allows%20capturin
g%20both%20values,ranking%20series%20and%20individual%20compounds (accessed
[76] T. Mosmann, Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to
40
[77] J. van Meerloo, G.J.L. Kaspers, J. Cloos, Cell sensitivity assays: The MTT assay, in: I.A.
Cree (Ed.), Cancer Cell Culture. Methods in Molecular Biology (Methods and Protocols),
[78] J.H. Musser, T.T. Hudec, K. Bailey, A Simple One-Step Synthesis of Alkyl Benzazol-2-
FIGURE CAPTIONS
Figure 1. Recently approved anti-TB drugs and novel chemical entities (NCEs) in TB pipeline.
MICs have been provided in the parenthesis.
Figure 2. Benzo[d]imidazoles reported as potent anti-TB lead molecules. The reported MIC values
converted into µg/mL have been provided in parenthesis.
TABLES
Table 1. The NH4Cl-catalysed catalyzed amidation of 6 with various arylalkylamines to from 8.a
R1
R1
R3
N O
+ R2 n NH2 NH4Cl (20 mol%) R3
N O neat, 100 ºC N HN n
N O (7)
(6a/b) (8) R2
Yield
Time of 8
Entry R1 n R2 R3 Product
(h)
(%)b
41
1 H 1 H H 8a 0.5 94
2 H 1 2-F H 8b 1.5 79
3 H 1 4-F H 8c 1.5 82
4 H 1 2,4-di-F H 8d 2 68
5 H 1 3,4-di-F H 8e 2 67
6 H 1 2,5-di-F H 8f 1 78
7 H 1 2-Cl H 8g 2 73
8 H 1 3-Cl H 8h 1 81
9 H 1 4-Cl H 8i 1 76
10 H 1 2-Me H 8j 2 69
11 H 1 2-OMe H 8k 0.5 84
12 H 1 2,4-di-OMe H 8l 0.5 82
13 H 1 3,4-di-OMe H 8m 2 76
14 H 1 4-CF3 H 8n 1 79
15 H 1 H Me 8o 1.5 76
16 H 1 3,4-methylenedioxy H 8p 0.5 81
17 H 2 H H 8q 0.5 83
18 H 2 3,4-di-OMe H 8r 1.5 78
19 Cl 1 H H 8s 1 84
aEthyl 1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-2-carboxylate (6) (1 mmol) was treated with the
arylalkyl amines (7) (1 mmol, 1 equiv) in presence of NH4Cl (20 mol%) at 100 ºC under neat
conditions. bThe isolated yield of the corresponding carboxamides 8.
Table 2. The NH4Cl-catalysed catalyzed amidation of 6a with various alicyclic amines 9 to form
42
HN NH4Cl (20 mol%) N O
+
N O Z neat, 100 ºC N N
N O (9) (10)
Z
(6a)
Yield of
Entry Z R1 Product Time (h)
10 (%)b
1 O - 10a 0.5 78
2 S - 10b 1 67
3 CH2 - 10c 0.5 75
4 NR1 Me 10d 1 89
5 NR1 2-OMe-C6H4 10e 1.5 91
6 NR1 4-OMe-C6H4 10f 1.5 89
7 NR1 4-COMe-C6H4 10g 2 69
8 NR1 CH(C6H4)2 10h 2 79
aEthyl 1-phenyl-1H-benzo[d]imidazole-2-carboxylate (6a) (1 mmol) was treated with different
alicyclic amines (9) (1 mmol, 1 equiv) in the presence of NH4Cl (20 mol%) at 100 ºC under neat
conditions for the indicated time period. bThe isolated yield of the corresponding cycloalkylamides
10.
Table 3. Anti-mycobacterial activity, cLogP and cLipE values of the synthesized compounds and
43
8d 3.125 5.73 11.24 10b 25 3.39 7.99
8p 25 5.41 10.01
aCalculated using ChembioDraw Ultra 12.0. b99% inhibition of growth of Mtb H37Rv (ATCC
27294 strain). ccLipE calculated using formula cLipE = Log(MIC in gm/mL)-cLogP. dData taken
Table 4. In vitro cell viability against RAW 264.7 cells lines for compounds with MIC ≤ 6.25
μg/mL.
44
3 8c 6.25 18.10 27.64
aMIC determined against Mtb H37Rv strain. b% inhibition at 50 μg/mL concentration determined
45
O N
O
N
O
F3CO
Br Delamanid (OPC67683) N
(MIC 0.006 µg/mL) NO2
O
N
O N NO2
Ref 18-19
F3CO
N
2006
N
Re
20
OH
f1
O
ef
R
00
7
20
Pretomanid (PA824)
20
05
Approved (MIC 0.13 µg/mL)
Bedaquiline (TMC207) Anti-TB drugs
(MIC 0.004-0.07 µg/mL) and
NCEs in TB R
23 ef O
21 N
20 O
ef
H 3C H 3C
09
13
R
N
Ref 22
20
2005
F3C S O
H 3C NH HN
SQ109
(MIC 0.7-1.56 µM or NO2 BTZ043
0.23-0.51 µg/mL) (MIC 0.001 µg/mL)
Cl O
N N
N H
OCF3
N
Q203
(MIC 2.7 nM or 1.5 µg/mL)
Figure 1. Recently approved anti-TB drugs and novel chemical entities (NCEs) in TB
pipeline. MICs have been provided in the parenthesis.
46
OnBu
N NH O
NH
R
N
NH
NH Cl Cl
N MIC: 0.8 µg/mL
R MIC
NEt2 1 µM (0.39 µg/mL)
Ref 39
MIC: 0.75 µg/mL C
2
NMe2 0.06 µg/mL
Re
-4
40
f3
O-4-F-C6H4 0.63 µg/mL
D
ef
B
R
N H N
H Ref 37 Ref 43 N
Br N NO2 N
S A N E Br
N Re MIC: 52 ± 2 nM
f4
47
H F
R
(0.89 µg/mL)
Ref 45
G Cl
NO2
O N
Cl
N HN
F Br
N O
MIC: 1.6 µg/mL O MIC: >7.25 µg/mL
S N
N
F O
Br
MIC: 0.0625 µg/mL
Figure 2. Benzo[d]imidazoles reported as potent anti-TB lead molecules. The reported MIC
values converted in to µg/mL have been provided in parenthesis.
47
S O S O
Cl N HN CF3 N N
F F N
O
MIC 2.3 µM MIC 2.18 µM
I J
N O
Br S O O
E N HN R1 K
N
N F3C N HN O
H N
O
(52 ± 2nM) (L) MIC 1.9 µM
SCHEMES
N NHR1 N OEt
1
N O N + NH2R
O
Scheme 1. Synthetic strategy for the construction of the newly designed scaffold L.
O H H
NH2 N O N O
OEt
+ H +
NH2 N OEt N
R O R R
(Not f ormed) Only product
48
NH2 O
OEt
H
NO2 R1 NO2 R1 NH2 R1 O N O
(2) In/HCl (aq) (5)
Water, ref lux, 2h Water, 1 h N OEt
F N N
2h H H
1 3 4
R1
6a, R1 = H; 80%
6b, R1 = Cl; 63%
49
Declaration of interests
☒ The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal
relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
☐The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered
as potential competing interests:
50