NUMBER 5
WO ae
May 2011
Introduction
The newsletter of the research consorlivm PROFACITY {ful fille: “Profane citizenship in
Europe’) will be published every six months. It will be disinbuted electronically, on the
website of PROFACITY (hitpJ/www profacily.ev) and be available by mail fo every
individual and organization wanting fo receive it ~ just send an e-mail to Rober!
Maier (tr maier@uu.n)
The research consorlivm PROFACITY consists of academic partners from France
Ths numbers (MODYS, Belgivm (CIC), Portugal (CIIE-FPCELP}, Slovenia (LU) and the Netherlands
(ULL, which are allstedying “Profane citizenship in Europe": including a wide diversity
1 rodtetion of groups and different domains in their research. The newsletter hot the aim to
2 Web Docuerperences inform all perons and groups who might be inlerested in our work. The newsletter will
have a number of regular items, such a3 presentations of resuik of the research
3 Penenol Colurm Group and of eaves of important discussions, presentations of the pariner involved mn
the project and their contact, and announcement: of relevant events and
4 PROFACITY coloovium — MyieiecL
5 Projects The last six months the consortium has continved working on WP7 the comparative
5 Publications synthesis, WP6 the web documentary and the preparations forthe final colloquivm in
September 2011. In this issve of the PROFACITY newsletter we present contrbutions
6 berate on experiences designing the web documentary and a pemonal column of Robert
6 Agenda Mater
www profacity.eu
Picture of the PROFACITY consortium during the 30-months meeting in Ghent
m0
“SEVEITH FRAMEWORK
PROGRAMME.
The research leading to these refults har receivedt funding fram the European Correnunsty’s
Seventh Framework Progrorene (FP7/2007-2011) under grant agreement n*225511“The audience will be
able to see a personal
accountot a lfe path, a
present and past situation
we witess and are invited
toretlectin orderto define
how we wish our cultural
and political landscape to
be in the future.”
“SEVEITH FRAMEWORK
PROGRAMME.
on
fend
NEWSLETTER
Web Docu experiences
By Hugo Morango
The PROFACITY web documentary is one of the outputs from this scientific research
project It picks up the knowledge and experences of the different fields and
researchers and transforms it into a media arlfact, which intends to reach @ wider
farget audience than the scientific deliverables.
Creating this bridge definitely attracts me, as someone who, coming from a
background in Anthropology, opted for a more creative approach fo social and
cultural scientific subjects.
Thi project is possible through the collaboration and negotiation between creativity
‘and science, so between the ditecton and the researcher: themselves, their
knowledge, personality and expectations for their media content With them, | have
been living some wonderful experiences while filming this documentary. traveling to
France and see the peonal side of a Kebab chop while eating great fast food: visiting
‘a “sans papier’ immigrant in her home and witness fit hand her feelings and good
humor; wandering around the highly surveilled area of the Gare de Lyon; reviewing the
memories and kindness of a grassroots worker near Pars; in Poriugal filming at high
speed with Zé Luis while finding possible ways of communication with him through
gestures and visual expression; acknowledge the beauty of a poem in sign language;
fr transform a dry methodology into video; and, of course, back here in lovely Utrecht,
re-act a theatre play with Guner (which | had filmed two years ago]; film in Said's
Printing studio and enjoy a bit of the country’s side curious sheep while Debby
interviewed Jihad.
And I'm not the only one firming, apart from me, until now four other directon/editors
‘are collaborating in this project Zé Luis in Porto, Marko and Maja with the Invida
‘company in ubljana and Ernst in Ghent
In order fo show the different paths one walks in citizenship, if was suggested that the
researchers would focus on an individval example for their 3 to 4 minutes video. In most
episodes the audience willbe able to see a personal account of a life path, a present
‘and pas! sitvation we witness and are invited to reflect in order to define how we wish
our culivral and political landscape fo be in the future. With the sane emotional and
intellecival valve we will abo witness episodes that portray collective experiences
defined whether by space, hstorical happenings or methodological developments.
And now, ashort description of the arlfact
The web documentary willstart with an introductory sequence that shows the feet of a
person walking through the cily. On the pavement and through his/her hands, words in
different languages and objects pass by that identify concepts connected with the
project
In the end of this sequence this persons meets several others and the pavement itself
becomes the interface of the web documentary. The Lirecht team has the clear
intention of developing this interface in an intuitive and organized style which allows @
‘quick and structured access fo the media contents.
Apart from the appealing visual design, created with a young audience in mind, two
words define this interface: simplicity and pragmatism. You'll watch the short docs
‘grouped by the three PROFACITY themes, symbolized by objects. You can ako see the
content by research grovp/country. A map will give you acces: to bref texival
Information on the research groups, field photos, documents and audio clips. Links to
the portfolio and training module will be available here, as the content of the web
documentary will work as educational material for the activities of the training module.
From the main window, buttons allow the web documentary fo be shared by
Facebook and Twitter and a credit and help windows will be available.
In September you'll have fo watch if! Until then have a great Summer!dee a
CITY
“Iwas to some extent
already a litle expert to
handle the situation of
being an outsider”
“SEVEITH FRAMEWORK
PROGRAMME.
Pray Des
Personal Column
By Robert Maier: personal lessons in citizenship
In my life there are many experiences of being @ newcomer. | was a newcomer
because of moving to a new region or country ot a newcomer fo @ new social field
Therefore, | was quite sensitive conceming questions of belonging to a group, versus
being considered or feeling myself to be an outsider
In fact, lam a refugee, because my parents had fo leave their city of residence and
werk when | was very young. | de not remember anything, but the consequences for
my parent were rather drastic and dramatic, because they lost everything they had
Up fo the age of seven, | lived with my parents and my sister in a small town some fifty
lulometers from Vienna. And at the age of seven, my father had the possibilly to open.
4G hairdresser shop in KitzbUhel in Tyrol and my family moved there. | could not
understand the dialect spoken by other children or grown-ups, and | felt profoundly
uprooted. For at least one year! had a deep feeling of homesickness, and | remember
that my parents allowed me in the summer lo go fora week back fo the lillle town we
had left. At that fime, I started to read a lot, and | think | remember a wooden bench
in the litle place where | read a book feeling very happy, but | could not find it back
when | visited thi place many years later. After being mote than one year in the new
place, | had the impression fo belong to i, However, soon affer because the
important school orientation step in Austria takes place a the age of fen) a new type
of uprooting happened: | went fo @ gymnasium some fifly kilometers from Kitzbuhel
Already the first lesson was a profound experience: the class teacher asked all the
pupik fo present themselves (name, where from, profession of the father, and when |
fold that | am the son of a barber from Kitzbvhel | was told by the class teacher that
my chances fo succeed in this gymnasium are really limited, and that it would be
better to consider to go back to my place.
Smilar experiences happened in other places where | went to school, such as
Innsbruck and Sakburg, but | was to some extent already a little expert to handle the
sitvation of being an outsider. Afier finishing secondary school | wanted fo go to the
university, but there was no money. Therefore, | went fo Zurich, to work for a year in
order fo save a sufficient amount in order to start my studies. Once more, | war
uprooted, and | could not understand the language, the so-called Swiss German
After a year, | had saved enough, and | started my univenity study in Geneva. That
was more or less a challenge, but already consciously chosen as an adventure: a new
place, a new language, and a new social field. Indeed, at my parents place, there
Were no books, and quite often | was fold: “once more you have not done anything
but reading the whole day” It look quite some lime for me not fo feel an outsider af
the university, not only because of language difficulties, but mainly because of a great
lack of ‘social and cultural’ copital, to use a term from Bourdiev. On many rather
secondary, but important occasions, such as table manners, or social conversation, |
felt completely awkward, not knowing how to behave
After more than ten years, | wos offered a job in the Netherlands, and | had become a
kind of expert of being a newcomer. | ceriainly did commit many mistakes (with
language, or conceming normative cultural expectations) | did not feel anymore so
‘awkward. In shorl, | have become used fo have rights, and ako to feel to belong
without being completely proficient with all the local habits. Or, in other words, my
‘apprenticeship of citizenship was well under way.Daa)
How do the different
interpretations of profane
citizenship experienced in
sitvations of fragile or
relative balance,
contibute to the
conternporary dynarrics
created by the
interactions between
society and citizenship?
“SEVEITH FRAMEWORK
PROGRAMME.
NeWsLETTER alas
CITY
PROFACITY colloquium:
Profane citizenship in Europe. Testing democratic ownership in
hybrid situations.
Dates and place: 19th ~ 21st September 2011 - Lyon (France]
The symposivn will address new forms of citizenship that are experimented by
people living in hybrid situations - ie. not shictly within the norm - and that modify
the outlines of jundical citizenship. Those forms of citizenship imply practical
activiies connected fo existing schemes or milieus, and what is at stake & the
continuous invention of the democratic principle itself, ie. the "right to have righs”
Such practices assert and express a “droit de cité” that snot immediately
granted, and feature what s called profane citizenship. Such practices ako stand
15 a fool to analyse democratic ownership.
The symposium will examine how the practices of actors who are in sitvations in
which they have te do with their faults, handicaps, lack of resources on the one
hand, and with the total or partial denial of their ciizenships on the other hand,
‘are taken (or nol) into account os altematives fo so-called expert citizenship.
The symposium willy to determine where and when the notion of profane
cizenship has impacted the recent transformations of democracy in various
national frameworks, by concentrating not only on the juridical concepts of,
cilzenchip but ako on its corresponding sociological configurations. To do so, the
symposium will use the material and fist results from fieldwork into different
sitvations, that have been submitted fo the groups of people concemed
What kind of troubles in citizenship result from hybrid situations and experiences
from those involved in such situations? What ate the difficulties they are facing?
How do they interpret their rights? How do they fake part in the community? How
do they assert their rights? How do they legitimate their acts? What is the
knowledge they call upon to assert their rights and to take par! fo the community?
How do those experiences coninbute to the evolution of societies? How are they
kept (or nol) on the fringe of societies? What are the milievs, the operations, and
who are the operators that translate the public concems and civie questioning
‘embedded in hybrid sitvations into citzenship? What kind of initiatives are
undertaken by the actor involved in those sitvations? What the political and
public extent of those initiatives?
What relations do those experiences create with juridical citizenship, laws (national
law and European law) and the practices of law? How are profane
Interpretations of cilizenship elaborated by both those who enforce the law and
‘guarantee that rights are respected, and those who represent the different miieux
fraducteur? How does this result in renewing the meaning of cilzenshio?
How do the different interpretations of profane cilizenshio experienced in
sitvations of fragile ot relative balance, contnbute to the contemporary dynamics
created by the interactions between sociely and cilizenship? How does the
notion of profane citizenship thed new light on the practices of citizenship,
according to different poltical and democratic national frameworks?dee a
CITY
Young people, women,
minorities and rrigrants wil
be exarrined asfour
specitic groups at risk of
political disengagement.
“SEVEITH FRAMEWORK
PROGRAMME.
Pray PAGES
Interesting other research projects.
PIDOP - Processes Infivencing Democratic Ownenhip and Participation
(SSH7/C1/2009/225262)
This project will examine the processes which infivence democratic ownership and
arlicipation in eight European states. It will draw on the disciplines of Politics,
Sociology, Psychology and Education fo examine macro-level contextval factor:
(including histoncal, poliical electoral, economic and policy factors (including
familial educational and media factor) and psychological factor [including
motivational, cognitive, attitudinal and identity factor) which facilitate and/or
inhibit civic and political engagement and participation
The research will be ground-breaking in incorporating the psychology of the
individval citzen within its scope, and it will be detinclive in addressing the
psychological processes through which political, societal and social factors have
their effects upon citizens’ civic and political engagement and paricipation.
Young people, women, minoriies and migrants will be examined as four specific
grovps at risk of poliical disengagement The research will focus on the
differences, as well as the overlap, between civic and political engagement, and
‘on both direct and representative parlicipation
An innovative mulirlevel process model of civic and political engagement and
parlicipation will be constructed, which will explain how and why different forrns
‘and interpretations of democratic ownership and participation develop or are
hampered amongst cilizens living in different European countries and contexts,
with particular attention being paid fo the relevant phenomena at regional
national and EU level
Appropriate stakeholders at regional, national and EU levels will be involved in al
slages of the work, fo ensure that the research addresses isves of direct concem
fo these stakeholder, ond to ensure that the policy implications and
recommendations which emerge form the research meet the needs of these
stakeholders and ate disseminated appropriately to them
Publications of the consortium
Batiegay, Alain (2010) "Décrypterla complexité culturelle”in Ulf Hannerz, La
complexité culiveelle, éditions @ la crosée.
Coelho, Orauidea (2010) "Da légica da justficagae légica da descoberta, Ser
surdo num mundo ouvinte um testemunho avtobiogréfice" Cademos de
Educacao, 36, 197-221
Rottier, Frane (201) “Participating in the meaning of lfe: a contributor’s
critique.” Foundations of Science. http //dx doi org/10.1007/s10699-010-9220-9
Rotiier, Franc. (2010) “The hatred of democracy revisited” In Bechier. N. & De
Angels, G. eds. Problems of Democracy: Probing the boundaries. Inter
Disciplinary Press,
Tel Delage, Marie-Thérése (201) “Citoyens av cos par cas" in Migration et
sociéiés, & paraire
Tel Delage, Marie-Thérése (201) La vie contélée des sans papiers, & paraiire
Tel Delage, Marie-Thérése (2011) La-bos c'est sans espoit, ici ga peut
s‘anranger2, in Plein droit, rewe du GIST, octobre 2011Dag)
“SEVEITH FRAMEWORK
PROGRAMME.
NeWsLETTER alas
CITY
Interesting other literature...
Ballet, Jéréme, Dubois, Jean-Luc & Mahieu, Frangois-Régis (2007). "Responsibility
for each other's freedom: agency as the source of collective capabilly’, Joumal
‘of Hunan Development, 82, 185-201
Gadamer, Hans-Georg (2004). Truth and Method. London: Continuum.
Kress, Gunther (2010). Mulfimodality: a social semiotic approach fo
contemporary comrrunication, London & New York: Roviledge.
van Leeuwen, Theo (2008). Infroducing Social Semiotics. London
RoviledgeFalmer.
Agenda
May 13, 2011- Espanet Social Policy Research Day 2011. Utrecht Univeriy, the
Netherlands
‘May 24, 2011- Public Session of the Group in charge of the 2012 Work Programme
of the Bth Theme of the 7th Frarnework Program ~ Socio-Economic Sciences and
Humanities (SSH), Gabinete de Promogao do 7 Programe-Guadro de I&DT
(GPPQ). Auditorium I, Facully of Psychology ond Educational Sciences of the
Univenily of Porto, Porte, Portugal
June 3-4, 2011- Intemational Conference “Challenging Cilizenshio": Centre of
Social Studies of the University of Coimbra, Portugal
hitp //www.ces.ve_pi/challengingcitizenship/ pages/en/home php
‘August 8-13, 2011-10" intemational conference on compuiing anticipatory
systems. Cenire for hyperineursion and anticipation in ordered systems. University
of Liege, Belgium
‘August 25-27, 2011-4" ECPR general conference. Univenily of Iceland
www.ecpmetora
September 8-10, 2011- 9% annual ESPAnet conference. Sustainabilly and
transformation of European Social Policy. Polibienestar Research Insitvie and the
Depariment of Social Work and Social Services, Univerity of Valencia
www.espanet.org
September 19-21, 201 1- Profacity Colloauy: Profane citzenship in Europe. Testing
democratic ownentip in hybrid sitvations. Lyon, France.
September 22-23, 201- Profacity Consorhvmn Meeting. Lyon, France
October 18-21, 2011- Démocratie ¢t paricipation. EHESS Pars
www patiicipationetdemocratie ft