Microsoft Excel 16.

0 Answer Report
Worksheet: [Book1]Sheet1
Report Created: 7/19/2020 7:01:41 PM
Result: Solver found a solution. All Constraints and optimality conditions are satisfied.
Solver Engine
Engine: Simplex LP
Solution Time: 0.047 Seconds.
Iterations: 8 Subproblems: 0
Solver Options
Max Time Unlimited, Iterations Unlimited, Precision 0.000001, Use Automatic Scaling
Max Subproblems Unlimited, Max Integer Sols Unlimited, Integer Tolerance 1%, Assume NonNegative

Objective Cell (Min)

Cell Name Original Value Final Value
$F$14 Des Moines SHIPPED 0 4525

Variable Cells
Cell Name
$C$3 Kansas CHICAGO
$D$3 Kansas ST LOUIS
$E$3 Kansas CICINNATI
$C$4 Omaha CHICAGO
$D$4 Omaha ST LOUIS
$E$4 Omaha CICINNATI
$C$5 Des Moines CHICAGO
$D$5 Des Moines ST LOUIS
$E$5 Des Moines CICINNATI
Original Value Final Value Integer
0 25 Contin
0 0 Contin
0 125 Contin
0 0 Contin
0 0 Contin
0 175 Contin
0 175 Contin
0 100 Contin
0 0 Contin

Constraints
Cell Name Cell Value Formula Status Slack
$C$8 DEMAND = 200 $C$8=$C$6 Binding 0
$D$8 DEMAND = 100 $D$8=$D$6 Binding 0
$E$8 DEMAND = 300 $E$8=$E$6 Binding 0
$F$3 Kansas SHIPPED 150 $F$3=$H$3 Binding 0
$F$4 Omaha SHIPPED 175 $F$4=$H$4 Binding 0
$F$5 Des Moines SHIPPED 275 $F$5=$H$5 Binding 0
NonNegative
Microsoft Excel 16.0 Sensitivity Report
Worksheet: [Book1]Sheet1
Report Created: 7/19/2020 7:01:41 PM

Variable Cells
Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
$C$3 Kansas CHICAGO 25 0 6 0 4
$D$3 Kansas ST LOUIS 0 1 8 1E+030 1
$E$3 Kansas CICINNATI 125 0 10 4 0
$C$4 Omaha CHICAGO 0 0 7 1E+030 0
$D$4 Omaha ST LOUIS 0 3 11 1E+030 3
$E$4 Omaha CICINNATI 175 0 11 0 1E+030
$C$5 Des Moines CHICAGO 175 0 4 4 1
$D$5 Des Moines ST LOUIS 100 0 5 1 1E+030
$E$5 Des Moines CICINNATI 0 4 12 1E+030 4

Constraints
Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
$C$8 DEMAND = 200 7 200 0 25
$D$8 DEMAND = 100 8 100 0 25
$E$8 DEMAND = 300 11 300 0 175
$F$3 Kansas SHIPPED 150 -1 150 175 0
$F$4 Omaha SHIPPED 175 0 175 0 1E+030
$F$5 Des Moines SHIPPED 275 -3 275 25 0
TRANSPORTATION
CHICAGO ST LOUIS CICINNATI SHIPPED CONTRAINSUPPLY
Kansas 25 0 125 150 = 150
Omaha 0 0 175 175 = 175
Des Moines 175 100 0 275 = 275
SHIPPED 200 100 300
CONSTRAINT = = =
DEMAND 200 100 300

COST
CHICAGO ST LOUIS CICINNATI
Kansas 6 8 10
Omaha 7 11 11
Des Moines 4 5 12 4525
Microsoft Excel 16.0 Sensitivity Report
Worksheet: [PARCTIICE101.xlsx]Sheet2
Report Created: 7/19/2020 10:20:58 PM

Variable Cells
Final Reduced
Cell Name Value Gradient
$C$4 BOWLS 18.333333269 0
$D$4 MUGS 10.833333366 0

Constraints
Final Lagrange
Cell Name Value Multiplier
$E$9 Usage 40 0.3333311462
Hairy Pottery NON LINEAR

BOWLS MUGS
18.33 10.83
PROFIT 2.17 2.83 70.42

Constraints Usage Available

1 2 40 = 40
Microsoft Excel 16.0 Answer Report
Worksheet: [Book1]Sheet5
Report Created: 7/19/2020 8:01:26 PM
Result: Solver found a solution. All Constraints and optimality conditions are satisfied.
Solver Engine
Engine: Simplex LP
Solution Time: 0.031 Seconds.
Iterations: 11 Subproblems: 0
Solver Options
Max Time Unlimited, Iterations Unlimited, Precision 0.000001, Use Automatic Scaling
Max Subproblems Unlimited, Max Integer Sols Unlimited, Integer Tolerance 1%, Assume NonNegative

Objective Cell (Min)

Cell Name Original Value Final Value
$L$11 TOTAL COST New York 0 9550

Variable Cells
Cell Name
$D$4 Toronto Chicago
$E$4 Toronto Buffalo
$D$5 Detroit Chicago
$E$5 Detroit Buffalo
$D$11 Chicago New York
$E$11 Chicago Philadelphia
$F$11 Chicago St. louis
$D$12 Buffalo New York
$E$12 Buffalo Philadelphia
$F$12 Buffalo St. louis
Original Value Final Value Integer
0 650 Contin
0 150 Contin
0 0 Contin
0 300 Contin
0 0 Contin
0 350 Contin
0 300 Contin
0 450 Contin
0 0 Contin
0 0 Contin

Constraints
Cell Name Cell Value Formula Status Slack
$D$13 shipped New York 450 $D$13=$D$15 Binding 0
$E$13 shipped Philadelphia 350 $E$13=$E$15 Binding 0
$F$13 shipped St. louis 300 $F$13=$F$15 Binding 0
$D$20 Chicago = 0 $D$20=0 Binding 0
$D$21 Buffalo = 0 $D$21=0 Binding 0
$F$4 Toronto shipped 800 $F$4<=$H$4 Binding 0
$F$5 Detroit shipped 300 $F$5<=$H$5 Not Binding 400
Microsoft Excel 16.0 Sensitivity Report
Worksheet: [Book1]Sheet5
Report Created: 7/19/2020 8:01:26 PM

Variable Cells
Final Reduced Objective Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Cost Coefficient Increase Decrease
$D$4 Toronto Chicago 650 0 4 1 1
$E$4 Toronto Buffalo 150 0 7 0 1
$D$5 Detroit Chicago 0 1 5 1E+030 1
$E$5 Detroit Buffalo 300 0 7 1 0
$D$11 Chicago New York 0 1 6 1E+030 1
$E$11 Chicago Philadelphia 350 0 4 2 1E+030
$F$11 Chicago St. louis 300 0 5 2 1E+030
$D$12 Buffalo New York 450 0 2 1 1E+030
$E$12 Buffalo Philadelphia 0 2 3 1E+030 2
$F$12 Buffalo St. louis 0 2 4 1E+030 2

Constraints
Final Shadow Constraint Allowable Allowable
Cell Name Value Price R.H. Side Increase Decrease
$D$13 shipped New York 450 9 450 400 300
$E$13 shipped Philadelphia 350 8 350 150 300
$F$13 shipped St. louis 300 9 300 150 300
$D$20 Chicago = 0 4 0 150 300
$D$21 Buffalo = 0 7 0 400 300
$F$4 Toronto shipped 800 0 800 300 150
$F$5 Detroit shipped 300 0 700 1E+030 400
TRANSSHIPMENT

Manufacturers Chicago Buffalo shipped supply

Toronto 650 150 800 <= 800
Detroit 0 300 300 <= 700
shipped 650 450

New York Philadelphia St. louis shipped

Chicago 0 350 300 650
Buffalo 450 0 0 450
shipped 450 350 300
= = =
demanded 450 350 300

Transshipment Flows
Chicago 0
Buffalo 0
Manufacturers Chicago Buffalo
Toronto $4 $7
Detroit $5 $7

New York PhiladelphiSt. louis

Chicago $6 $ 4 $ 5
Buffalo $2 $ 3 $ 4

TOTAL COST $ 9,550.00

Microsoft Excel 16.0 Sensitivity Report
Worksheet: [PARCTIICE101.xlsx]Sheet6
Report Created: 7/19/2020 10:31:34 PM

Variable Cells
Final Reduced
Cell Name Value Gradient
$B$5 PRICE DESIGNER 36.487804631 0
$C$5 PRICE STRAIGHT LEG 25.659840302 0

Constraints
Final Lagrange
Cell Name Value Multiplier
$D$9 CLOTH USAGE 4074.6359218 0
$D$10 CUTTING USAGE 5251.0563693 0
$D$11 SEWING USAGE 13371.948648 0
WESTERN CLOTHING COMPANY

DESIGNER STRAIGHT LEG

DEMAND 602.40 1,062.90
PRICE 36.49 25.66
PROFIT 24.49 16.66 32459.23

CONSTRAINTS USAGE AVAILABLE

CLOTH 2 2.7 4074.636 <= 6000
CUTTING 3.6 2.9 5251.056 <= 8500
SEWING 7.2 8.5 13371.95 <= 15000
AVAILABLE
INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO

AVERAGE ESTIMATED
STOCK RETURN VARIANCE PROPORTION
A 0.08 0.009 Total Portfolio Return
B 0.09 0.015 Total Portfolio Invested
C 0.16 0.04 Total Variance
D 0.12 0.023
Desired Return 0.11 Sum 1.00

Correlations
STOCK A B C D
A 1 0.4 0.3 0.6
B 0.4 1 0..2 0.7
C 0.3 0.2 1 0.4
D 0.6 0.7 0.4 1
 0
0
#VALUE!