Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lysate Reagent
Lysate Reagent
The LAL test is a method of the Bacterial Endotoxin Test (BET) for detecting the
presence, and to go some way to determining the level, of Gram-negative bacterial
endotoxins in a given sample or substance.
Related terms:
Several test-kits are available. Mostly used for pyrogen control of pharmaceutical
products the LAL-test is applicable for predominantly Gram-negative containing
foods such as fresh meat, milk and eggs. Another field of application may be the
retrospective assessment of the microbiological quality of heated products.
MICROBIOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES
G.L. Pettipher, ... H.H. Wang, in Encyclopedia of Analytical Science (Second Edition),
2005
Limulus test
The Limulus test can be used to determine rapidly and specifically the cumulative
content of Gram-negative bacteria in foods. Gram-negative bacteria produce a
lipopolysaccharide (LPS) (endotoxin), which is a high-molecular-weight complex; it is
not produced by Gram-positive bacteria. Present in the blue blood of the horseshoe
crab, Limulus polyphemus is a nucleated cell called an amoebocyte, the cytoplasm
of which is densely packed with granules. Limulus blood clots in the presence of
bacterial LPS. All the necessary clotting factors are contained in the extract of the
amoebocyte granules, called Limulus lysate. The Limulus test is specific for LPSs and
is very sensitive. As little as 10−12 g LPS per milliliter can be detected, occasionally
even 10−15 g ml−1. A single Gram-negative bacterium contains 10−14 g of LPS.
For the Limulus test, a 10-fold dilution series of the sample is prepared and equal
volumes of the Limulus lysate and diluted sample are mixed in a test tube. The
test tube is then incubated before being inverted and read. If the mixture remains
unchanged and runs out of the tube then that dilution of the sample does not
contain LPSs. If a firm opaque gel is formed that sticks to the bottom of the tube
then that dilution of the sample contains LPSs. Generally, a visual reading of the
tenfold or twofold dilutions gives sufficient information about the level of LPSs
present in the sample.
The limulus amoebocyte lysate (LAL) test with chromogenic substrate is faster
than the gelation method, and it can be automated. The chromogenic substrate is
attached to -nitroaniline, that is released when reacted with the endotoxin-activated
enzymes. The free -aniline is read at 405 nm.
An alternative to both the LAL test and the classic rabbit pyrogen test is the Monocyte
Activation Test (MAT). The basis of the MAT is that pyrogens stimulate monocytes to
produce cytokines (IL-6, TNF-a) or lead to the formation of metabolites (neopterin,
nitrite) from cytokine-inducible pathway cells, which can then be measured in the
supernatants of the cultured cells by ELISA methods (IL-6, TNF-a, neopterin). Thus,
the test can detect non-endotoxin pyrogens as well as endotoxins [20]. Whilst the
method is limited by the need of blood from donors and the variability from one
donor to another, it is described in the European Pharmacopoeia, which confers it
legitimacy (chapter 2.6.30: Monocyte-activation Test). pharmacopoeia
False-positive results in urine for a positive latex agglutination test for GBS often
were caused by contamination of bag specimens of urine with the streptococci from
rectal or vaginal colonization [544]. The poor specificity of GBS antigen detection
methods used with urine led to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
recommendation in 1996 that these methods not be employed except for testing
of CSF and serum.
Figure 11.4. Image of the Limulus “horseshoe crab.”Image from Creative Commons
Library.
When endotoxin comes into contact with LAL, it initiates a series of enzymatic
reactions that result in the activation of a pathway to the production of at least three
serine protease zymogens (factor C, factor B, and pro-clotting enzyme). This pathway
alters amoebocyte coagulogen (an invertebrate fibrinogen-like clottable protein) to
form coagulin gel.
Serine proteases are enzymes that cleave peptide bonds in proteins, in which serine
serves as the nucleophilic amino acid at the active site. They are found in humans
as wells as in horseshoe crabs (and indeed in all mammals). In humans, they are
responsible for co-ordinating various physiological functions, including digestion,
immune response, blood coagulation, and reproduction. It is the blood coagulation
reaction that is similar in both humans and horseshoe crabs [29]. It is on this basis
that LAL has become the sensitive test reagent made from the soluble protein extract
(lysate) of horseshoe crab blood cells (amoebocytes). All commercial lysates can
detect picograms (10− 12 g) of endotoxin.
The reference test in the pharmacopoeias is the gel clot (or gelation) and is conducted
on the end-point principle. The description of the test and the necessary validation
and accompanying controls is so detailed in both US Pharmacopeia (USP) and
European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) (harmonized since 1999).
The clotting mechanism of the blood of the crab is designed to prevent the spread
of bacterial contamination throughout the horseshoe crab’s biochemical system.
When the endotoxin of Gram-negative bacteria contacts with the horseshoe crab’s
amoebocytes, a series of enzymatic reactions begin. The pathway alters amebocyte
coagulogen into a fibrinogen-like clottable protein, which forms a coagulin gel. The
defence mechanism is also effective against fungi, hence a similar reaction occurs in
response to a fungal infection, which triggers the clotting cascade. In the reactions,
-glucans trigger the protease enzyme factor G, whereas endotoxin triggers the
factor C enzyme, although the end result—coagulin—is the same [14].
A considerable amount more glucan (1000 times) is required to trigger the clotting
cascade than the equivalent amount of endotoxin. The glucan required to trigger
factor G can be of varying molecular weights (such weights range from 3 to 100 kDa)
[15]. The clotting reaction is illustrated in Figure 11.5.
The LAL reagent used for the gel-clot is supplied with an identified sensitivity or
label claim ( ), for example, 0.03 EU/mL. This means that when mixed with an equal
volume of the material under test, a gel or clot will form if the material contains
0.03 EU/mL or greater. For the kinetic methods, the lysate does not come with a
label claim. The test sensitivity is determined by the lowest point of the standard
curve used with each assay [16].
LAL tests require validation for each technician and each product before being ap-
plied routinely and, even then, valid assays require careful internal standardization.
LAL tests require the use of standard endotoxin, termed a positive product control
(PPC), which is a known amount of endotoxin mixed with a test material to confirm
the absence of interference.
In the early days of the LAL test, endotoxin standards were variable. The potency
varied with the method of purification, the bacteria of its origin and how it was
formulated. Initially LAL test results were reported as units of weight. The problem
with this was that results between tests and laboratories were not comparable. This
was because different endotoxins, of the same weight and from different species of
bacteria, can have different potencies. This led to the need for an endotoxin standard.
This standard was based on Escherichia coli 0113: H10 K negative. This introduced
the EU, which is a measure of the activity (potency) of endotoxin against the LAL test,
irrespective of mass [17].
The units of measurement for the LAL test are EU. These are a measure of the
activity of the endotoxin. Endotoxins differ in their biological activity or potency; the
pyrogenicity or LAL reactivity of one endotoxin preparation may be very different
from that of another of the same weight. Conversely, two endotoxin molecules
may be different sizes and different weights but may have the same reactivity in an
LAL test. The potency of an endotoxin determined with one LAL reagent lot may
differ from that determined with another lot. Expressing endotoxin concentrations
in EUs avoids the issues of different potencies of different endotoxins and allows
us to compare results of different LAL tests performed in different laboratories.
Consequently, it is not the usual practice to convert results of an LAL test in EU/mL
to units of weight of endotoxin per milliliter.
The origin of the test standard is from when the USP and US Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) commissioned Rudbach to resolve the issue by preparing a
reference endotoxin that was stable, could be chemically characterized, could be
lyophilized without loss of activity and that was free from biologically active proteins
[18]. This is termed reference standard endotoxin (RSE). Since RSE is expensive and
potentially exhaustible, control standard endotoxin (CSE), also manufactured from
E. coli 0113, is normally used for routine work but not necessarily for fundamental
research. The potency of a given batch of CSE is determined relative to the current
Ph. Eur., USP, or FDA lot of RSE and is specific to particular batches of LAL reagent.
Thus, a purified form of LPS is used to manufacture a reference standard for the LAL
assay. The endotoxin control is lyophilized with lactose and polyethylene glycol.
The MAT is based on the in vitro activation of human monocytoid cells in whole
human blood or cell lines by pyrogens. The presence of pyrogens such as bacterial
endotoxin stimulates the release of proinflammatory cytokines interleukin (IL)-1-
, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)- , which are quantified by ELISA, flow
cytometry, or bead-array.46,49,75 Variants of the MAT have been standardized and
validated47,83 and were adopted by the European Pharmacopoeia in 2010. Depending
on the diverse immunization strategies and novel vaccines and adjuvants, the use
of both the MAT and the LAL test for routine lot release safety evaluation has been
recommended.69
It is noteworthy that despite the benefits offered by the use of validated in vitro
cell culture assays, discussions with regulatory authorities are highly recommended
to ensure that any MAT analysis would suffice to monitor pyrogen contamination.
For example, pyrogens may induce fever independent of cytokines, by acting at
TLRs.21 Studies in mice genetically engineered to lack pyrogenic cytokines and
clinical observations of fevers that frequently occur without a concomitant increase
of circulating cytokines11,43,62,72 collectively suggest that the MAT assay may not
always faithfully reflect a physiological febrile response in humans. In such scenarios,
the RPT may be an indispensable or at least complementary tool to monitor febrile
signals.
In the course of the diagnostic application of the limulus test, it was pointed out that
positive reactions are observed with plasma of some patients even in the absence of
bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) [1]. Since some of these patients were suffering
from fungus infection or were undergoing hemodialysis with cellulosic dialyzers,
this pseudo-positive reaction had been suggested to be at least in part caused
by -1,3-glucans. Eventually, the -1,3-glucan-sensitive protease was found in the
hemocyte lysate [2,3] and purified, and termed factor G [4,5].