Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/320212038
CITATIONS READS
0 1,069
2 authors, including:
SEE PROFILE
Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects:
All content following this page was uploaded by Sudhir Chandra Das on 04 October 2017.
Dr. S. C. Das*
Ms. Shivani Kushwaha**
[Research Purpose-The present paper aims at identifying the factors influencing work-life balance practices
of insurance companies and assessing the impact of work-life balance practices on the employee’s work
domain.
Design/Methodology/approach- The present study focuses on responses on sixteen WLB statements of
300 respondents of managerial and supervisory cadres randomly selected from various insurance companies
in Kolkata, India. Data have been collected by survey method using structured questionnaire of four point
scale. The principal components method of Factor Analysis with varimax rotation and Ordinal Regression
Analysis - PLUM (Polytomous Universal Model) have been performed in order to identify influential
factors of WLB and the impact of work-life balance practices on family-work conflict (FWC).
Findings- The study identified four factors comprising sixteen items having Eigen values of more than 1
which accounted for about 52.9% of variation in data. Finally, thirteen statements were found to be
statistically valid valid on the basis of Cronbach’s alpha of internal consistency. The pseudo R2 values
(Nagelkerke = 37.6%) indicate that sixteen variables of WLB practices explain a relatively moderate
proportion of the variation on family work conflict. Further, the Wald statistics identified only four influential
variables out of sixteen variables which explain on family work conflict.
Implication for Practice- The present study would be beneficial for the service sector organizations in
order to design a effective workplace that facilitates work-life balance and results in minimum family-work
conflict.
Keywords: Work-life balance, Family-work conflict, Work-family conflict, Professional life, Personal life,
Factor analysis, Regression analysis.]
JEL Classification: G15, C22, G15, G01, C52
2000 2004 2008 2009 2012 2000 2004 2008 2009 2012 2000 2004 2008 2009 2012
Global Market 1500 1848 2490 2331 2621 922 1395 1779 1735 1992 2422 3243 4269 4066 4631
India 7.4 16.92 48.86 57 53.3 2.54 4.33 7.3 7.97 13.14 9.94 21.25 56.19 64.97 66.44
($ bn)
Market 0.51 0.92 1.96 2.45 2.03 0.27 0.31 0.41 0.46 .66 0.41 0.65 1.32 1.59 1.58
6
(Share In %)
Identifying Critical Factors of Work-Life Balance
India’s Ranking 07 09 10 9 10 30 27 28 26 19 23 19 14 9 15
Indian life insurance industry has FY02 to INR 57,964 crore in FY12,
gone through two cycles — the first which corresponds to a compounded
one being characterized by a period annual growth rate (CAGR) of 17.6
of high growth (CAGR of approx. 31 percent. Insurance density, which is
percent in new business premium defined as the ratio of premium
between 2001-10) and a flat period underwritten in a given year to the
(CAGR of around 2 percent in new total population, has increased from
business premium between 2010-12). USD 2.3 in 2000 to USD 10 in 2012. The
During this period, there have been growth in the general insurance
increase in penetration (from 1.77 industry has kept pace with the
percent in FY 00 to 3.96 percent in nominal GDP growth rate resulting in
FY12), increased coverage of lives, general insurance penetration
substantive growth through multiple remaining stable in the range of 0.55%
channels (agency, banc-assurance, to 0.75% over the last 10 years.
broking, direct corporate agency
3.2 Testing and Validation of Work-
amongst others) and increased
Life Balance Issues :
competitiveness of the market (from
four private players in FY01 to 23 Among all items presented in the
private players in FY12). The sluggish table 2, the variable “Quality family
period being experienced today by the time” and “Medical facilities” were
Indian life insurance companies rated with the highest mean score of
brings to fore the big challenge of 3.14 and the variable “Relaxation”
profitability. The industry’s scored lowest mean rating (1.96).
participants have been struggling to Sixteen items pertaining to work-life
achieve profitability in the face of high balance issues of Indian Insurance
operating losses primarily on account Employees in Kolkata (Table 2) were
of distribution and operating models. factor- analyzed using principal
Cumulative losses for private life component analysis with varimax
insurers are in excess of INR 187 rotation to determine the underlying
billion till March 2012, majority of factors and appropriateness. The
which have gone towards funding result of the Kaiser Meyer Olkins
losses rather than for meeting (K.M.O) measures was .859 and
solvency requirements. Bartlett test of sphericity is significant
(p<0.001), indicating significant
After liberalisation of the Indian
correlation exists between the
insurance industry in the year 1999-
variables and this result allows us to
2000, the Indian general insurance
proceed with the analysis. These
industry has witnessed rapid growth.
findings suggest that appropriateness
The industry’s gross direct premiums
of the data for factor analysis.
has grown from INR 11,446 crore in
sixteen variables only thirteen study has identified useful scale for
variables are found useful as the scale work life balance in insurance
of work life balance. companies and companies can focus
the useful issues identified in this
To fulfill the second objective of the
study. Further, the study has traced
study, i.e., measuring the impact of
using scientific method a few
select work life balance on family
variables which influence family
work conflict, the Ordinal regression
work conflict, i.e., family interfering
analysis using PLUM (Polytomous
with work.
Universal Model) has been used. As.
p<.001 for the final model, the References :
relationship between the dependent Eaton, S., If You Can Use Them: Flexibility
variable and the combination of Policies, Organizational Commitment, and
independent variables is statistically Perceived Performance. Industrial Relations,
significant. The Pearson test for 42(2), 2001.
goodness of fit shows that the
Ghalawat, S. & Dahiya, P., Work-Life
observed data are consistent with the Balance and Organization Practices- A
estimated values in the fitted model study of Selected Bank in Sirsa. KAIM
since the p was insignificant, p = 1.00 Journal of Management and Research, 3(1),
> 0.05. The Nagelkerke (the Pseudo R- 2010, pp 94-101.
Square Statistics) is.376. This explain Gordon, J.R., & Whelan, K.S. , Successful
moderate variation in the outcome professional women in midlife: how
variable. Further, the Wald statistics organization can more effectively
identified only four influential understand and respond
variables out of sixteen variables. to the challenges. Academy of Management
Executive, 12(1), 1998, pp8-27.
5. Scope for Further Research: The
results of the study based on sixteen Hammer L.B., Allen, E., 7 Grisby, T.D.,
statements; therefore, it is suggested Work family conflict in dual earner
to incorporate more variables. The size couples: within individual and crossover
effects of work and family. Journal of
of sample for the study was 300; the
Vocational Behavior, 50, 1997, pp 185-203.
same study can be conducted with
larger size of sample. Since WLB Hughes,J. & Bozionelos,N., Work-life
varies on culture and there is no work balance as source of job dissatisfaction
life balance policy in Indian insurance and withdrawal attitudes. Personal
Review, 36(1), 2007, pp145-154.
companies, it is suggested that an the
inter-city comparison may be Karatepe,O.M., The effect
conducted with scientific validation. of positive and negative work-
The further study in this area may be family interaction on exhaustion.
interlinking WLB policies with firm International Journal of Hospitality
Management, 22(6), 2010, pp 836-856..
performance and productivity. The