Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Abstract—The Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) systems assumes that the perception for AEB is resolved on the vehicle.
in vehicles is one of the technologies suggested by NHTSA to be This research is part of the project of the autonomous vehicle
included in vehicles by default. This article presents the dynamic VILMA01 (First Intelligent Vehicle of Laboratory of
model of the vehicle that should be considered to design control of Autonomous Mobility) [5] development at UNICAMP, Brazil.
EAB system. After that, the design of a classic controller is
presented, following of some results of simulations, which let to The first section presents the mathematical model of the
identify variables to measure the comfort of automatic braking, vehicle through the parameters of the VILMA01 vehicle. The
and when and in which conditions the ABS systems act over an next section presents the feedback control architecture and his
action of AEB. Finally, the Architecture of the implementation of tuning procedure. After that, some results of the implementation
the braking over CAN Networks is presented. of the control system performed over simulation are presented
to show if slip of each wheel exists and if the vehicle will require
Keywords— Automatic Emergency Braking, PID controller, to active ABS systems. Finally, we present some conclusions
vehicular dynamics, Intelligent transportation system, ADAS. and future work.
I. INTRODUCTION II. DYNAMIC MODEL OF THE VEHICLE
The freeway systems are facing many challenges due to the Three blocks from the dynamic model of the vehicle was
continuously increasing traffic risks by driver distraction [1]. developed to obtain the longitudinal speed. Firstly, the dynamic
This has increased the necessity to create and include in cars model of the rigid body vehicle is exposed, then the wheels
Advanced Driver-Assistance Systems (ADAS). One of this through the model adopted for estimating the longitudinal and
system is the Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB), which is a lateral forces are presented, and finally the hydraulic system of
function that automatically applies the brakes when the car has brakes is exposed.
determined a collision is likely. The AEB systems engage
dynamic brake support (DBS) or crash imminent braking (CIB)
to potentially save lives and reduce moderate and less severe
rear-end crashes that are common on our roadways.
Although, this function has not been mandatory right now,
U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA)
gives 5-Star Safety Ratings to cars, which has this type of
systems since 2011. Additionally, in 2016, 20 automakers
representing about 99 percent of new vehicles sales in North
America agreed with the NHTSA and the U.S.-based Insurance
Institute for Highway Safety to make AEB standard in 2022.
To support this help to security, Fildes et al. present that
Low-speed AEB technology led to a 38% reduction in real-
world rear-end crashes and that there was no significant
difference between urban and rural crash benefits [2]. The
results of [3] were in line finding that the reduction of all striking Fig. 1. Free Body Diagram of the vehicle. Adapted from [6]
rear-end crashes, regardless of speed area, ranged between 35%
and 41%. Although [4] present a work similar applied to heavy A. Vehicle
vehicles, in this type of development patents and industrial Fig. 1 shows the free body diagram of the vehicle. With this,
protection dominate. starting from Newton's 2nd Law and the sum of the moments
about the center of gravity of the vehicle, assuming motion in a
This article presents the design of a brake controller taking plane (x, y), we deduced equations (1) to (3)
account the dynamics of the vehicle in order to obtain
implication over the intrinsical security of the vehicle. This work
= − (7) 4000
− . 3000
− .
=− (8) 2000
+ . 1000
− .
Fx [N]
0
=− (9)
− . -1000
Fx(fr)
= 1,65 (10) -2000
F
-3000
(11)
x(fl)
= + Fx(rr)
-4000
+ Fx(rl)
= (12) -5000
-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20
s [%]
= + + (13)
Fig. 3. Longitudinal forces due to slipping ratio.
= (14)
. 4000
3000
= 1− + . (15)
2000
= . (16) 1000
= 1,30 (17)
F [N]
0
D =a F +a F (18)
y
-1000
+
= (19) -2000
F
y(fr)
Fy(fl)
BCD -3000
Fy(rr)
= (20) F
.
y(rl)
-4000
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10
= + + (21) α [º]
IV. RESULTS
A. Simulations
As already mentioned, in the scenario considered in this
project, the vehicle would always move straight and initially at
60 / ; after a certain time, would be decelerated to a desired
final velocity, which would be kept constant. Several values of
constant deceleration were tested until a value was reached for
which the controller was no longer able to provide the desired
speed, whose reference signal was subjected to a low-pass filter.