x MCE TIE — SUC IY LAE EER BE AOR RIERA EBLE RAE BDERL — | PRR SC + PAIALAL > EDT - 1S BiH El LH FP HY i HSN RAAWRA SOE FTF» (CBU AMER EAE RRREBA | ACRBLIATT BAER LAR FS BERN ASF HRI ~ SUES » REL » DRS FA > EUBOCRREE LHS SO RPE BURA» URKRLE AD HRWSS > ip BEELER BRZ RE >» BERL We (CO; ) BREAST ITES » MEA: AIEE SE CRE FURR D Bs ALD TT OB SST « ZEAE ASR» FAMERS RRR ER EA» 2015 ERT HERR SBR BK PRES, SRAAM - Olajirel HY —H (CRETE EBERT TE» RIT VET OBI ~ (EBB + OBES ROMS > LSE A SEFHTHEE HK > ALBTAER, 2030 ARATE EZ HEABC » BESIIAX Boundary Dam a (FABRA) HEAR sae? ‘BLP EA SERRA PD Lee "BOL EARLSLAR 1 EB CO. AAA BRAT RRR M - Hit 2016 Fea SRE SACRE (Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, CCS) Bae HSTRAR -MRT BARI SHRAAR BARE BRUCE RR SUGAR » SE — SUC BGS) ROSS APE I ES BR SULA ATS > OBC ZENE 775 1 bar BURR FIREEARISHE 40 C88 60 CZAR BE SESE CR ERT FA HOTTIE 4 vol 15 vol%.Z I > SEB E BaA NBER RARER AN RK ELA PETICERK BS aKi BON CRE) ABR AURA Qt FSR: BSL BURST RE > RUBE REI ALi IS SE EE» ORES OAS BEE BN AS HEATH 100 bar $4150 bar AUBERT SYEPRIPPAIAA > UMC (BK) HES SSSSISHEH + BO RRS BSA SMES RBS REE EA BOSS TS aT — BRS © ACP RACE ENTE > FILER ZK SWE» RAHI: (alkanolamines) 7k¥SRE ° ML 562 4H 3H (2015) 3HELA ER KR Bi— DUGG 8 BSE i — EEE BEAD + Bt SOUR | — RR ARSE AE Re: RNH; + CO, -+ RNHt+ RNHCOO- SEZ REPRO TRE » GARB RoR Folger”) EBT 4 Oi (L-2R iii RRAN HAUL « ARTES (LAR & (mono-ethanol-amine, MEA) 32:32 sola] Econamine FG Plus (Fluor Daniel ) + BKerr-McGee (Lummus) ; HHH ike) KM-CDR (=#H 1) Just Catch (Aker Clean Carbon) + Cansolv (Shell) system, and the HTC.CO;-Systems (HTC Purenergy) } FE (KAUSR ASAE ki (Alstom) + LL3k ECO, (Power Span ) + ARTE EL RTA ERT LSE ZS (Piperazine, PZ. RABE « HOMER 4 LH 62 45% 3H (2015) CO, FALE SAM ES ARPS) (equivalent work) » tisk A | SCR ET BH « HE TEER » ES SBE + OR POERREEE > FUFSPTHAGE (energy) SiR MEE BA: MORN — Alt COMB RE WPLAF «18 CO2 TERRE RD REBT RY Bs Wom = Braco, + Birwea — Bamana = BBLS = 0.087 EGS ay HEB CO, MTS ADDI Te Wares = Basco. + Bagsves ~ 0.0625 AEE ALAN SR Rae Re Wan = Warm -+ Wee ~ on GaRR A, +WRCO, a= a 0.292, 0.178 0.083 ZERIESHE (—) “PARROT EMME GRA OSS POL + Jassim and Rochelle"jG FAA SR SMATAARS HO * Wore = Quiean= Quiga Tas (1 “Tepe t OR)? FF Qana APRS MT * Tae EY WHE (~40°C ) > Twp OPS URSE TIRE © DAP SEE TEE a BE 85 SZ ILS A ACHE PUBIC NANCE | SNES BERLE ERB BCBIN 75 % « R-RKHTEMAR COMBE RMSSONLEM™ - 2015 4:73 0.196 EPR ALM CO; + BESh > RURAL BCE TSE AS 0.15 + BRR (4) 5h > FURS URIBE LS FEA COn HEE REARS KATENKRAR CO. HERAFRGPROOH LE Wea Wee = Wan BARR CO, 0.04 O14 0.446 0.02 0.108 0.306 0.01 0.103 0.196 BUN 108°C > IRM EOS 118 c: ARR RRA BEE BERRA SOSH + HA \EB ICO, ‘POMERAT TAS ZERIT AR Qo ~ EIB RRMA BAR SOB Qs ASA OK) RAEI Q. + RCC SHV eM BBA F » Lin and Wong DISSE T — SEO RTE» PA WPT ETRE RANE + HRB ER NRRL RRA » FDL Sh BRICK DARE Ca RRA ff (R=) + USE PRE RIMS (RMR ER ML 5h 62H 3H (2015) 5enn mn oR AoE RE AI MEGICOD, Vu Laer names SEAT RLM SRA HR Stage Fy TP, Vid Lx (a) AAR AS i iz O)TFRERD TED ULES SP aR A YS A TARA LEA ECR HR» (BEAR SUBS RRS eat SP RE» RPA > FEAR A at SBR» REAL BO + EEE SET BES AIO LARS SRIRAM TERT ORRD » DAA SERB » eH RATE POR BAT ROO « DUS SP MARAIS PGR TE MLR + SP ALLL ELBE SRL MEETS | BAR RGR > RZ RISER» FE 6 GL ¥ 62 &% 3 I (2015) ‘PORE ATE ee SRO 77 LN FAR + SRE RAERBAAABRBL ES > EHS Nalse gt 7 ZE Aspen Plus (SEWER MISY PATRAS : RRA REGS : ERASE HEGER PRR A AL | HH > CSR ENS + BCR BR + BERS RAE REER LM - HS RODANTHE - RRS PAA RT - RS LI DE EAL ARSES +Livetal RA OM RS BSR 7RIBIK COz HI BURIE > BER Aspen Plus PEE LOAE ERTE > (Trans- fer condition) Al AEF 1 (reaction con- dition) MBSRRE > RATAN RAR RMBAAGNSSH HRRHSRE FFs HHL (a) He (b) ABADI Pinsent et al. (4 fy BASF AEBillets and Schultes!! VF GAL > LAR (©) Puxty et al. 28h) BR HEEGBillets and Schultes HHH") » [BBR HRERBATUETAN $n AER SFR | (ARAL Pinsent et al. HHBM #904188 Billets and Schultes pase") FAME FAB Yu et al. OR PETER ERT MOB ° PAZERA SRR > DARA Extent 0, tot eticanys) +075, and = 0.25 (a)Pinsent etal. 47 48 42!" 9e Billets and Schultes!"56 sa a! ie Hes Aa ERR ERIASTRL RE Ra AS ALS BARE FE ADRS TERE» ATRIA AAR SLR AB RBS Le Moullec et al.""*13g3544¢ 1975 3] 1980 FELASA AEN ie CB MGHE > Ze 80 AE ARH] 2004 AEA» EBAY PFC ONC AHIR + BURR AY TABELE 2004 NRA HENS « HLAPAREE BFR RAA ET MEAS SHH 20 WEAN TA IO FR 3 SES COUN) a RSA » COWIE 6 OE 3: PERS AIRE» BYANELK > hep ‘Smuston CO, Remora Eno) eas ee 3 8 8 $=0.25, and = 0.75 (b)Puxty et al. 2) 484% 10"°194 Billets and Schultes 91422!" te Stak Stat ented CO, ono tiny) eee sss 88 a Repered CO, omoat tiny) (opPinsent et al. "Fy 44 44% AH Billets and Schultes "19 (48-28 FAM] Yu et al! 3 mA Bi Aspen Plus ‘Ey 0a 38:5 620-3 (08 FRR PP ML 5 62 HH 3 IHW (2015) 7+ PARDO AL > + Seal + TRAE ‘Sema + CRA + ERK +P Robo» + BRAK + Tho PASE A + + PRR + FTES RM + APRS 8 TUR + + RGRAK + FURS P Bode» + FBR AR + AUR FOR AR © + PURE ARES + + UGB SB + REMUS + FE « TA (SB SERS ERE RETA L ROR > DULSEE > TERUG » ESE RAAUBEAR » PREC OHS 9 (CK | BS ADT SA > SARI LAS ONT + AUS HELIO» AURIS PAR BG AEBS AH > HEARS S SOONERS » ROR 5 (DETTE + AAR ABR» SHORE SNIPE» PESTA > SMU + Le Moullec and Kanniche! 1S} 95) a3 17 Waste (7 A MEL REA | HH-PSSHEC MRK RHF RASBR—GR > WRT E Re 4-8 % ; EAB ROMA + HILT REDE 15-27% | GREE GRAS AMRAHR RS TREASURER RAR » FLIES RRR AEP > SAAD MERE | MRE SEE» AAD RBI AR - IRDA ABA URE - BCA RR * HARE RAB + OBESE REAR eS OBLIGATE » DARE ME RSS Bl > TR RSS BULLAE > HIB EBS » ENS BEE ~ AVA AR BARONESS Al SBR ROR > ATT E 8 GLH 62 8% 3 I (2015) WEARS CRRA > DRI YEAST HEATER DEAT PR EAE RS BRIE, GHA > BARRIER MAES ARIAL » ECR AC FEB CAVOER + Bras » BAS + MLL > APRA RS BLS ZA GE > CERISE PS > ERE BI A HR BRE ABE ES SRB AS PTE BR LS PL BB AERA SE RRS» I FORO TRIE ABE: cI > VENT > PRA ANS R CE ERENT + SUCRE >» HA FARO RE Sc FS ZS I Bl + ORR ERAT BE PRA» RSL LES EERE BAO SBR + RUBLES + URE » KAREN {CBA RERRAS TERA » Epa a se PH LR RETA ° INBRED ARE — SCS AFRMHNRS (EVO > BER PUA SAMARAS NAMES » BME ER ZA ARERR eS PRR LE AAR RIE HR ES PARLE — LRBit BRS HE SR + FF CCE ES ZS AB ER PAIR PAR BCL A NN IS PE ASE >) AUK SCRE Tre SURE A BIER ABBR A] DLS SS BEEAS — SLR + ERE RANE > ARIAS LUBE Fike FORNEY » LEE HATTA RAE» URL RATER ETL ERLE cree Rae ACBL S39} EA BABS COBRA > HLA [Rf] > BEET HPROUR MCSE RRR FL > HL EAR SHRM RRND - MIR (Rotating Packed Bed, RPB) #1//BRED9 SAR SES + He RE Se 1a MOUSER » PLE RPB AE RE SARE! - AAD BRS eT RAS COn AIA HELE » SAPAAMOUERBE » ERNE PAARL A RZ BBR OZ SCE HL EOE RRR - ‘PRR ERE Se» HSE SARIS FE « PRTG» ABB LE RA COMM BASMCET | MARAT RR RN GRAM - EMILE R KN 'h > BMH CO,ARMBATAERS > BR SUAGAIANERE > MAY CO, St RHR 460.3 2A > BWI COn SRR RAB Bete 0.49 FEB» BUEN RAAB SBR Tm Ha) BoB RSE LR ML 5 62 4H 3H (2015) 9‘Acctbet = 20% MEA 100) Leen arye0:45 mol Cv NEA, Vee Viee os 00 |ZZGRPe 8 & Capture Efficiency (%4) 8 90/112 120/112 110/55 120/60 130/65 (Operation Concition: Q. (kgf) / Qe (New) mA ‘SCO % of simulation BEAR 1/3 TER RRA He MEA 30 w% AAD = 13.15% MEA 55 wt AAD% = 2.10% MEA 75 wi AAD% = 2.14% Bt AAR BERS AZ. BE ETE RE — BRR AR IRAE ATPL eS FAW 13 ERE RTC ROI BOR CIAL) SEAR ESL ER OS SE REE ACBIUBR FATA AE » (ERE ERERI SE REBRANES NLRB IR » He (ENTRAR A] SOV | Kang et 10 eH 62 AH 3 I (2015) al.2914-4¢ gPROMs #17 —(8A 7 [Al BRA ERA » OLR AE ZMIEN COZ AR » AOA + SIDA 1 9 Lee Cheight of mass transfer unit) » ZEEE FERAL OS TCO AES EE LA FR HORE + CEEOL STRATEMRE ESCRHREE > ARE ESE ARIEL: | PGE ASU > ATE EERE RAMIRD » HORT AEE SORA EER BR WME > RHBRSUBH - SiG. RITE SEARO — 82 CMRP OLR — SA ER PHD RRR TR wRm my MOTT + HESRARLET » UE BRE « SHAE PREBLE RNAS EEN ELIE | (AFSL A | SDL Aspen Dynax mics 77 > RACAL OAD » BREE AR RR Bl fg BEZE EPROMS FIC ‘fH RE LEFT PY + RR BIRIE ED > RACEHOVERERRER RA - ARERR GRE NAR RMIT EEE + SEE A REAVER (PBUH > DURE ERE Be 45; + Lin et al. 13} 7 (BH BABE OU TET SULIBR AERIS FEET ESE od | Vented Ges | eee | ARE | MABRERE EARN A Se) 2 RE ERC AO} Fi ° SCR EA PAPEBRT F RE» REAL ‘FER he LENE C1 97 2 (BR HA — A, BRA | AERA ER, HG CERES SAAD + SLUR awe EMBER ES 7 + i t+ Apr ° Linetal RR wR AK PONCE BE SNARK PRE» RDU T Ae» RE BN COT > MTS Ara > ALE BBS DAB BS A SE MSS TN SHI, Be > ae IE AO BOTA MacDowell et alO*1 25/7 HaFRtHHJEUDLN REE « SUS SAA > AE BR AR D> HR REA Ree EASE | EA AMUSE LAL» PRIA Fete il HT ICT HEE A (TD SR: BATA WNAAA ALS Bui et al.) 5 SFr ATL» 7 Sta Absorber \ Water purge t+ — (ERS RR ML 62 HH 3H (2015) 11Absorber cova E+— BARU ER RATER +S BRAN CO ARNE RHR 12 LH 62 AH 3 I (2015)CO, capturerate Reboiler duty (qm) m 10s fe Coy ‘Time (min) a jz ys ° 0 wo E ° 50 100 ‘Time (nin) B+ RPS R RECS RAR seu 1. Olajire, A. A., COz Capture and Separation ‘Technologies for End-of-Pipe Applications- A Review. Energy, 35, 2610 (2010). 2. Folger P., Carbon Capture: A Technology Assessment, CRS Report for Congress http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R41325.pdf (2013). 3. Cousins A., S. Huang, A. Cottrell, P. H. M. Feron, E. Chen, and G.T. Rochelle, Pilot-scale Parametric Evaluation of Con- centrated Piperazine for CO, Capture at an Australian Coal-fired Power Station, Greenhouse Gas Sci. Technol. 5, 1, 7 (2015). 4, Yang N., H. Yu, L. C. Li, D. ¥. Xu, WF. Han, and P. Feron, Aqueous Ammonia (NH;) Based Post Combustion CO; Caps ture: A Review, Oil Gas Sci. Technol., 69, 5, 9312014 (2014). 5. Sandler S.1., Chemical, Biochemical, and LH 62&H3H (2015) 13Engineering Thermodynamics, 4 Ed, John Wiley and Sons, New York, U.S.A. (2006). 6. Rochelle, G. T., Amine Scrubbing for CO, Capture, Science, 325, 1652 (2009) 7. Jassim M.S., and G. T. Rochelle, Innovative absorber/stripper Configurations for COz Capture by Aqueous Monoethanolamine, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45, 2465 (2014). 8. Feron, P. H. M., Progress in Post-Combu- stion CO, Capture, European CO» Capture and Storage Conference Towards Zero E- mission Power Plants, Brussels, Belgium (2005) 9. Lin P. H., and D. S. H. Wong, Carbon Di- oxide Capture and Regeneration with Ami- ne/alcohol/water Blends, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 26, 69 (2014). 10, Freguia, S., and G. T. Rochelle, Modeling. of CO; Capture by Aqueous Monoethanola~ mine, AIChE J., 49, 1676. (2003). 11. Zhang, Y., H. Chen, C. C. Chen, Plaza, J. M., Dugas, R., Rochelle, G. T. Rate-Based Process Modeling Study of CO, Capture with Aqueous Monoethanolamine Solution, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res, 48, 9233. (2009). 1. EGb + SCH - TEER. a= > BY EERE RS ET RNA oo Bef (2014). 13. Liu J. L., H.C. Gao, C.C. Peng, D. S. H. ‘Wong, S.S. Jang, and J. F. Shen, Aspen Plus rate-based Modelling for Reconciling Laboratory Scale and Pilot Scale CO, Ab- sorption using Aqueous Ammonia, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con, 34, 117 (2015). 14, Pinsent, B.R.W., L. Pearson, and F.J.W. Roughton, The Kinetics of Combination of Carbon Dioxide with Ammonia, Trans. Faraday Soc., 52, 1594 (1956). 15. Billet, R., and M. Schultes, Predicting Mass ‘Transfer in Packed Columns, Chem. Eng. Technol., 16, 1 (1993). 14 LH 62 AR 3-H (2015) 16. Puxty, G., R. Rowland, and M. Attalla, ‘Comparison of the Rate of CO, Absorption into Aqueous Ammonia and Monoethanola- mine, Chem. Eng. Sci., 65, 915 (2010). 17. YuH., S. Morgan, A. Allport, A. Cottrell, T. Do, J. Mcgregor, L. Wardhaugh, and P. Feron, Results from Trialing Aqueous NH; Based Post-combustion Capture in a Pilot Plant at Munmorah Power Station: Absorption, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 89, 1204 (2011) 18 Le Moullee Y., T. Neveux, A. Al Azkib, A. Chikukwa, K. A. Hoff, Process Modi- fications for Solvent-Based Post Combu- stion CO; Capture, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 31, 96 (2014). 19, Le Moullec Y., M. and Kanniche, Screening of Flowsheet Modifications for an Efficient Monoethanolamine (MEA) Based Post- combustion CO, Capture Int. J. Greenh, Gas Con, 5, 727 (2011). 20. GRAB» JEG» BERGE + BSE. MBE SPER + ALE PRA ER Re — A (eH SR Ee CN Pat. No. 203635055 U (2014) 21, Ramshaw C., and R.H. Mallinson, Mass Transfer Process, U.S. Pat. No. 4,283,255 (1981). 22. Lin, C.C., W.T. Liu, and C.S. Tan, Removal of Carbon Dioxide by Absorption in a Ro- tating Packed Bed, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res, 42, 2381 (2003). 23. Tan, C.S., and J.E. Chen, Absorption of Carbon Dioxide with Piperazine and its Mixtures in a Rotating Packed Bed, Sep. Purif, Technol, 49, 174 (2006). 2A Jassim, MS., G. Rochelle, D. Eimer, and C. Ramshaw, Carbon Dioxide Absorption and Desorption in Aqueous Monoethanola- mine Solutions in a Rotating Packed Bed, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res, 46, 2823 (2007).25, Yu, C.H., HH. Cheng, and C.S. Tan, CO, capture by Alkanolamine Solutions Con- taining Diethylenetriamine and Piperazine in a Rotating Packed Bed, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 9, 136 (2012). 26 Kang .L., K. Sun, D.S.H. Wong, S.S. Jang, and C.S. Tan, Modeling Studies on Absorp- tion of CO, by Monoethanolamine in Ro- tating Packed Bed, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con,, 25, 141 (2014). 27. Kvamsdal, H. M., J. P. Jakobsen, and K. A. Hoff, Dynamic Modeling and Simulation ofa CO; Absorber Column for Post-Com- bustion CO; Capture. Chem. Eng. Process, 48, 135 (2009) 28 Lawal, A., M. Wang, P. Stephenson, and H. Yeung, Dynamic Modelling of CO; Ab- sorption for Post Combustion Capture in Coal-Fired Power Plants, Fuel, 88, 2455 (2009) 29, Biliyok, C., A. Lawal, M. Wang, and F. Se- ibert, Dynamic Modelling, Validation and Analysis of Post-combustion Chemical Absorption CO, Capture plant, Int. J. Gre~ enh. Gas Con., 9, 428 (2012). 30 Biliyok C., A. Lawal, M. Wang, and F. Se~ ibert, Dynamic Validation of Model for post-combustion Chemical Absorption CO 2 Capture Plant, Comput. Aided Chem. Eng., 30, 807 (2012). 31, Lawal, A., M. Wang, P. Stephenson, G. Koumpouras, and H. Yeung, Dynamic Mo- delling and Analysis of Postecombustion CO; Chemical Absorption Process for Coal-fired Power Plants, Fuel, 89, 2791 (2010). 32. Panahi M., and S. Skogestad, Economically Efficient Operation of CO, Capturing Pro- cess. Part II. Design of Control Layer, Chem. Eng. Process., 52, 112 (2012). 33 Lin, Y. J., T. H. Pan, D.S.H. Wong, S.S. Jang, Y.W. Chi, and C.H. Yeh, Plantwide Control of CO; Capture by Absorption and Stripping Using Monoethanolamine So- lution. Ind, Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 1338. 34 Chalmers H. and J. Gibbins, Initial Evalu- ation of the Impact of Post-combustion Capture of Carbon Dioxide on Supercritical Pulverized Coal Power Plant Part Load Performance, Fuel, 86, 2109 (2007). 35. Chalmers H., J. Gibbins, and M. Leach, Valuing Power Plant Flexibility with CCS: The Case of Post-combustion Capture Re= trofits, Mitig. Adapt. Strategies Glob. Chang, 17, 62 (2012). 36 Cohen S.M., G.T. Rochelle, and M.E. Web- ber, Turning CO, Capture on and off in Response to Electric Grid Demand: A Base~ line Analysis of Emissions and Economics. J. Energy Resour. Technol., 132, 021003-1 (2010) 37. Cohen S.M., G. T. Rochelle, and M.E. Web- ber, Optimal Operation of Flexible Post- combustion CO; Capture in Response to Volatile Electricity Prices, Energ. Procedia, 4, 2604 (2011) 38 Lin Y.J., D.S.H. Wong, S.S. Jang, and J.J. Ou, Control Strategies for Flexible Ope- ration of power plant with CO, Capture Plant, AIChE J., 58, 2697 (2012). 39, MacDowell, N. N. Shah, Identification of the Cost-Optimal Degree of CO, Capture: An Optimization Study Using Dynamic Process Models, Int. J. Greenh. Gas Con., 13, 44 (2013). 40. Bui, M., I. Gunawan, V. Verheyen, P. Feron, E. Meuleman, and S. Adeloju, Dynamic Modelling and Optimization of Flexible Operation in Post-Combustion CO; Capture Plants-A Review. Comput. Chem. Eng, 61, 245 (2014). LH 628H3H (2015) 15