Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chan 1977
Chan 1977
w
tions.
IDE-BAND
communication
In communication
low-distortion
systems and instrumentation
amplifiers
applica-
systems, for example, amplifiers are
are widelly used in
.
,=)70 I I Vcc
(10-16V)
the circuit
are bias
distortion
resistors common
and high-frequency
to both
gain.
half-circuits.
Resistors REE
Transistor
R2
R, R
‘u
400
80
Qcc
.
100
IL
t
‘c2A
T ,
QCCis connected as a VBE-multiplier and sets the bias voltage
at the collectors of Ql~ and QIB. Other important compo-
nents in the bias circuit are Zener diodes Z1 and Zz which
have a 5.5-V dc voltage drop and allow direct connection of
Q3A ~,
o
‘IA R RP2 to the output.
t I .,” 230 RBfl 70 ~:2A
vi ‘EEI 60 REE2 40
distortion and noise contributions. The noise is minimized by
‘EIB 8
designing the devices to operate at high-current densities, as
‘F2B 125
RE2B described in the next section. Distortion is minimized by
19
operating the Zeners well beyond the knee of the Zener char-
v ‘FIB 230 RBB 70
s. 22
QIZI ,
0.. acteristic. In addition, series resistance in the Zeners must be
I minimized since this causes errors in the values of RF2A and
I H7; RC,8 c“ 100j Rc2B
—
~~ ‘;: ~~ L
( RF2B . In the final circuit, the Zeners made no measurable
contribution to the distortion performance and added only
Fig. 2. Complete schematic of the wide-band monolithic amplifier.
about 1 dB to the circuit-noise figure.
The distortion performance of the circuit of Fig. 2 was also
simulated by computer using the program SPICE [4] , and the
but computer simulation showed that the gain and bandwidth bias currents in the various stages were set largely on the basis
requirements for this design could not be met in a single-stage of computer prediction of best distortion performance. At
circuit of this type using monolithic technology. low frequencies, the distortion is due almost entirely to non-
The advantages of the circuit of Fig. l(a) can be retained linearity in Q3A and Q3B. At the upper end of the frequency
while the gain-bandwidth product is increased if a two-stage range, the output devices are still the most important, but
version of the circuit [1] is used. This is shown schematically distortion due to the input stage is significant because of the
in Fig. l(b), where simultaneous shunt and series feedback is decrease in gain of the output stage.
applied over two stages to realize resistive terminal impedances
of 75 S2, together with a much larger gain-bandwidth product. IV. MONOLITHIC PROCESS AND DEVICE STRUCTURE
Since feedback is applied over two stages, substantial feed-
The distortion specification of the amplifier is one of the
back-loop gain is realized for the minimization of distortion.
most important characteristics and is heavily dependent on
In the final circuit a balanced version of this configuration
the characteristics of the monolithic transistors used. In
was used, and input and output signals were taken differen-
addition, realization of the gain and bandwidth requirements
tially. This eases the biasing problem in the IC and also gives
of the amplifier requires transistors with f~ in the region
a large amount (20-30 dB) of second-order distortion can-
of 1 GHz.
cellation.
The design of low-distortion transistors requires optimiza-
The complete circuit of the monolithic amplifier is shown in
tion of device geometry and epitaxial (epi) layer character-
Fig. 2. The input and output signals appear differentially at
istics. The effects of device geometry can be seen by an
~ and VO, respectively. The differential terminal impedances
approximate analysis of high-frequency distortion in the
are 75 !2 and the terminal impedances of the half-circuits are
transistor. It can be shown [5] that third-order intermodu-
37.5 Q. The component values in the circuit were optimized
Iation distortion in a bipolar transistor at high frequencies
by computer to yield 20-dB gain with maximum bandwidth
is given approximately by
and adequate input and output impedance matches. This is
achieved by minimizing a figure of merit M where ~~ cjEQ VT 11 1
+CjCQRL; ;+l Y
4 R~I~ () VQ
ml, = (2)
~j~Q VT
1+ ~ cjCQRL
where
Coefficients At and Bi are weighting functions at different
frequency points, G is the circuit gain, PI and p2 are input K
Cjc . (3)
and output voltage standing-wave ratios (VSWR), and ~i is
(% + VcB)”n
the frequency.
The circuit is biased from a single supply Vcc which can and
have values from 10 to 16 V. Resistors RF1 and RE2 provide
VT . LT. (4)
shunt-series feedback and RF1 also provides dc bias to the
q
input base. Resistors RE1 and RF2 provide series-shunt feed-
back. A Darlington output connection is used to improve In these equations IQ is the collector current, ~Q the collector-
CHAN AND MEYER: MONOLITHIC WIDE-BAND AMPLIFIER 687
DEEP n+ (COLLECTOR)
~~
A A
1-E
~ \ I
DEEP p+ (BASE) EMITTER n+
(a)
“\E’B; E[B c
--- ,,
...
P+ P+ P+
—-*FU ‘P- \~
3pm n+
n
L!!L
“+
BURIED LAYER
p SUBSTRATE
(b)
1
-- -50
L Mess.red IM3
because of the presence of cjEQ in the transistor. The pres- -60
j
ence of cjfJQ also causes the device ~~ to fall at low ]Q. In 0+ 1 I I
order to minimize this source of distortion, the device must o 10 20 30 40
COLLECTOR CURRENT (mA)
be designed for minimum cj~Q and operation at moder-
ately high IQ k WRntid. Fig. 4. Transistor distortion and .fT versus collector current.
This also minimizes second-order
intermodulation.
An additional source of distortion not considered. in (2) is used to reduce the base resistance and improve the high-
high-current ~T falloff due to the Kirk effect [5]. This can frequency gain and noise figure. The base diffusion is about
be minimized by the choice of epi layer characteristics. Be- l-~m deep and the active basewidth about 0.4 Mm. The pro-
cause of difficulty in controlling out-diffusion of the buried cess uses eight masks and standard aluminum metallization.
layer, no attempt was made to operate with the epi region In Fig. 4 measured curves of~~ and IM3 (at 200 MHz) versus
depleted, and epi thickness and doping of 3 Urn and 1 Q . cm collector current are shown for a typical device. Distortion
were used to minimize the Kirk effect. predicted for the device by SPICE is also shown and is close
The monolithic device structure used is shown in Fig. 3. to the measured value. The behavior predicted earlier is
An interdigitated base and emitter structure is employed to observed in that as IQ is reduced
distortion increases rapidly
maximize the emitter periphery which is the active region and ~T becomes dependent on IQ. Thus typical bias currents
of the emitter at high-current levels. In order to minimize the in the output devices of the circuit are in excess of 20 mA
total emitter area (and thus CjE Q ), the minimum possible where the device j_T is approximately constant and equal to
emitter contact opening is used. In this process, an emitter 800 MHz.
contact opening of 2.5 pm was used with an emitter-wash The amplifier circuit of Fig. 2 utilizes Zener diodes Z1 and
technique. Developments in lithography allowing submicrcrn Zj as part of the bias circuit. In order to reduce the noise
dimensions should allow significant further improvements contribution of the Zener diodes, the devices are designed for
in distortion in devices of this type. small geometries [6] and high-current density. An additional
A cross section of the device is shown in Fig. 3(b). A deep requirement in this application is that 21 and Z2 should be
n+-diffusion is used to contact the buried layer anld reduce reasonably well matched and this precludes the use of mini-
the collector series resistance. A deep p+-diffusicm is also mum-area devices. The Zener is fabricated using the n+- and
688 IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS, VOL. SC-12, NO. 6, DECEMBER 1977
n+ d, ff. $,on —
uj-
1 1
(a)
;~, “*’’””W
15pm P’
“-
n+ Buried Ioyer
P Subs frafe
(b)
10’14 VoltsZ/H,
I
Fig. 7. Die photograph.
10 (mA)
+
V.
Fig. 6. Measured noise-voltage spectral density versus bias current
for the Zener diodes.
p’”- diffusions, and the device structure is shown in Fig. 5. The Fig. 8. Typical external connections to the IC.
b
o----o Measured
— Computed
_25-
t ~
; lo-
3
~5
1
ok- ,~
Frequency (MHz)
-50-
inaccuracies in modeling capacitive parasites in the IC.
The noise figure of the amplifier has a worst case value of
9 dB at 250 MHz. Reverse transmission in the amplifier is
-37 dB and measured input and output VSWR was less than
1.7 in a 75-Q system. Total power dissipation was 1.65 W
from a 14-V supply.
and IM2 is below -55 dB across the amplifier bamdwidth. [1] R. G. Meyer, R. Eschenbach, and R. Chin, “A wideband ultra-
The distortion becomes worse as frequency increases because linear amplifier from 3 to 300 MHz,” IEEE J. Solid-State Cir-
cuits, vol. SC-9, pp. 167-175, Aug. 1974.
the feedback-loop gain of the amplifier diminishes. Below [2] K. A. Simons, “The decibel relationship between amplifier dis-
20 MHz the measured IMZ increases because the coupling tortion products,” F’roc. IEEE, vol. 58, pp. 1071-1086, July
transformers become unbalanced and the second- order can- 1970.
[3] J. B. Couglin, R. J. Gelsing, P. J. Jochems, and H. J. M. van der
cellation degrades. This can be improved by using larger cores Laak, “A monolithic silicon wideband amplifier from DC to 1
on the transformers. GHz,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-8, pp. 414-419,
Measured and computed values of IM3 in Fig. 10(b) are Dec. 1973.
[4] S. H. Chishohn and L. W. Nagel, “Efficient computer simulation
fairly close except at high frequencies. The measured values of distortion in electronic circuits,” IEEE Trans. Circuit Theory,
are below -42 dB across the band and below -55 {cIBbelow VOL CT-20, pp. 742-745, NOV. 1973.
690 IEEE JOURNAL OF SOLID-STATE CIRCUITS, VOL. SC-12, NO. 6, DECEMBER 1977
[5] H. E. Abraham and R. G. Meyer, “Transistor design for low dis- Universities and Colleges” in 1971-1972. He is a member of Sigma
tortion at high frequencies,” IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, Tau and Phi Kappa Phi.
vol. ED-23, pp. 1290-1297, Dec. 1976.
[6] W. F. Davis, “A five-terminal *15 V monolithic voltage regu-
lator,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, vol. SC-6, PP. 366-376,
Dec. 1971.
Robert G. Meyer (S’64-M’68-SM’74) was
born in Melbourne, Australia, on JUIY 21,
1942. He received the B. E., M. Eng. Sci.,
and Ph.D. degrees, all in electrical engineering
from the University of Melbourne, Australia,
Kam H. Chan was born in Macau, South in 1963, 1965, and 1968, respectively.
China, on February 20, 1949. He received In 1968 he was employed as an Assistant
the B.S. degree in electrical engineering from Lecturer in Electrical Engineering at the Uni-
the California State University, Fresno, in versity of Melbourne. Since September 1968,
1972, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in elec- he has been employed in the Department of
—. .-.
tronics from the University of California, blectrlcai kmgmeermg and Computer Sciences,
Berkeley, in 1974 and 1977, respectively. University of California, Berkeley, where he is now an Associate Pro-
He has been employed as a Research Assis- fessor. His current research interests are in integrated-circuit design
tant at the Electronics Research Laboratory and device fabrication. He has been a Consultant to Hewlett-Packard,
in the University of California, Berkeley, IBM, Exar, and Signetics. He is coauthor of the book Analysis and
since 1973. In 1974 he was a Co-op Student Design of Analog Integrated Circuits (Wiley, 1977).
at Motorola Semiconductor, Inc., in Phoenix, AZ. In 1977 he was Dr. Meyer is secretary of the Solid-State Circuits Council of the IEEE
employed as an Acting Instructor at the University of California, and is an Associate Editor of the IEEE JOURNALOFSOLID-STATECIRCUITS.
Berkeley. His interests are in device modeling, analysis and design He is a member of the ADCOM of the IEEE Circuits and Systems Society
of high-frequency integrated circuits, and process development. and is an Associate Editor of the IEEE TRANSACTIONSON CIRCUITS AND
Dr. Chan was elected to “Who’s Who Among Students in American SYSTEMS. He is a member of Sigma Xi.
Special Correspondence
Manuscript
The authors
received March 7, 1977; revised July 29, 1977.
are with the LSI Detielopment
Electric Corporation, Itami, Japan.
Laboratory, Mitsubishi
where
pOwer-delayprOduc
(l-::’2)cv2
CYn and ~i are the normal and inverse current gain, re-