Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The paper analyse the situation of vulnerable women who are trapped in a highly
caste based patriarchal society, these women are marginalized not only because of their gender ,
but also because of societal discrimination that prevails against Dalits. They face extreme
discrimination but are neglected . The paper uses the life experience of Babitayi kamble to bring
out the different levels of discrimination that Dalit women face in an Indian rural context. The
intersectional theory allows us to intersect different aspects such as gender and community to
identify the severity of discrimination faced by them. The autobiographical text gives us a clear
picture of how cruel and barbaric are the discrimination that they had to face, such as verbal
abuse , untouchability and many more. The pathetic situation of Dalit women is a bitter truth of
Indian cast and rural system and must be addressed as soon as possible.
aswinn092@.gmail.com
7025486439
Double Marginalization of Dalit women: An Intersectional analysis of Babytayi Kamble’s
Dalits have been the most exploited , subjugated and oppressed class in India . Women of
this class are even worse victims because of their gender , as they face double marginalization
due to their caste and gender. The main source of this marginalization is due to the inequality
that is present in the society , this discrimination eventually leads to insecurity, injustice and
exploitation. Marginalized groups are always far from the mainstream society and their opinions
are not valued in any manner as they are considered inferior to other classes. Eventhough Dalit
women make a lion share of the population of India they are neglected by the mainstream
feminists as they focus more on a gender discrimination stand point which altogether ignored the
fact that a Dalit is not just marginalized on the basis of her gender but also as an inferior human
due to her caste therefore they feel isolated from the mainstream feminist movements. In short
we can assume that a conventional feministic approach might not be enough to analyse and
address the issue of Dalit women. Women of a higher cast might be able to relate to an orthodox
feministic movement as she faces no problems in the name of a caste hierarchy, which is obvious
but ignoring the problems of a huge portion of population might feel like a propaganda . Most
Dalit women do not have access to education , sanitation , food, proper shelter and not even a
clean source of drinking water . Even for those Dalit women who has a respectable education
and job may not get the same treatment as a privileged mainstream women at her work place or
at an educational institution . Even with so much advancement in time , not much has changed
for the women in Dalit communities. With such a status of being “doubly marginalized” makes
them a special category , whose needs and problems cannot entirely be understood from the
standpoint of either caste or gender , therefore an entirely different approach should be employed
castes and gender identities as they are reinforced and reproduced in society. The concept of
interlacing has convincing applicability in the Indian context because it is recognized at a point
where several axes of oppression meet. The salient issues of gender inequality cannot be
the caste axis represents a blatant denial of the many previleges of the caste system.
Intersectionality indicates a multi-layered connection between race, gender, and other systems
that cooperate to permit and oppress privilege. Intersectionality is relative because it shows how
race, gender, and other factors work together to shape the experience of others. Crenshaw used
intersectionality to refer to how race, class, gender, and other systems combine to shape many
experiences by creating room for privilege. Here intersectionality is used to show the
Carrying the burden of caste, class and gender, Dalit women advocate an intersectional approach
to address the roles of multiple sub-identities in shaping their experiences. Eventhough the
feminist movements emerged in the late 1800’s and those social evils prevailing at that time was
addressed such as the sati and other related evils , as the time progressed we had to wait for a
long time to witness a Dalit movement, at the time of Dr B.R.Ambedkar . But that too failed to
address the issues of women in Dalit community . only in the late 1900’ that we were able to
witness some Dalit women activists talking about their rights and also witnessed the rise of
literatures by Dalit women. In 1958, the term "Dalit literature" was used at the first conference of
Maharashtra Dalit Sahitya Sangha (Maharashtra Dalit Literature Society) in Mumbai . the real
originality and force of Dalit writing, which today constitutes a substantial and growing body of
work, can be traced to the decades following the late 1960s. Those are the years when the Dalit
Panthers revisit and embrace the ideas of Babasaheb Ambedkar, and elaborate his disagreements
with the essentially Gandhian mode of Indian nationalism, to begin a new social movement . In
the following decades, Dalit writing becomes an all-India phenomenon . Dalit literature started
being mainstream in India with the appearance of the English translations of Marathi Dalit
writing. An Anthology of Dalit Literature, edited by Mulk Raj Anand and Eleanor Zelliot. Later
on Dalit women started to write works on the oppression and discrimination and their creations
started to make an impact on the society. These writers have primarily used poetry, short stories,
essays and more to challenge the intersectional forms of oppression they faced. Dalit women's
literature reveal that systems of caste and gender are connected and particular disadvantages for
Dalit women result in experiences of oppression that are distinct from that of upper caste women
We can find many such writings of women who had to face marginalization on the
basis of gender , cast and sexuality , writers such as P.Sivakami and Babytai Kamble are the
account of all the trauma that they had to face as a women belonging to a lower class society .In
this particular paper Babytai Kamble’s autobiographical work The prisons we broke wil be
analysed with the theory of intersectionality to better understand the marginalization ,from a
region of Maharshrta. She is one of the earliest women writers from the untouchable caste , her
distinctive writing style and auto biographical works set apart from the other authors from the
community. Kamble is acclaimed for her work called Jina Amucha which was later translated to
English . This work got critical appreciation from experts due to its exceptional portrayal of the
life of an untouchable women . One of the major portions of the book articulates caste and
gender discrimination and multilayered violence suffered by Dalit women at the hands of the
savarna (upper caste Hindus) and Dalit men. Kamble writes from an untouchable woman's
perspective, not deterring from naming patriarchy in the untouchable community nor sparing the
internalized patriarchy by Dalit women. This honesty and reflexivity has been largely missing in
upper caste women's writings. Kamble also underscores how the caste Hindu women and men
treated untouchables with contempt, disgust, and hate. This work became one of the most
experience of living in a society deeply rooted in oppressive caste norms, and how to gradually
create space to break free from caste norms. Barriers to freedom here include not only the
restrictions imposed on individuals by others, but also the structures of control in society. As a
result, these restrictions are imposed on some and not on others. The most notable aspect of this
text is that it places the concept of self-liberation in the context of community. This self differs
from the concept of the abstract individual self that has traditionally been at the center of most
liberal theories of liberty. This idea of continuity between self and community is emphasized by
both Gopal Guru and Sharmila Rege when discussing the epistemological resistance of Dalit
women. Baby Kumble begins the story with a very personal account of her love for her
grandparents. She grew up with her brother in her grandparents' house in Virgaon, Talka, Pune
district, Maharashtra. The residents of Mahalwada lived in extreme poverty. Her father, who
worked as a local contractor, spent all his money on food, clothes, and tea. is the reason why she
is difficult to live with. This is a uniquely personal story, but it also points to the larger structure
of oppression that women face on a daily basis. As patriarchy takes hold in society, women are
beginning to accept similarly oppressive patriarchal norms. But what is important here is that the
author also speaks of the oppressive social and economic conditions imposed on him by the
upper castes. She writes, "Our women offer their entire lives to the service of the earth. But when
they themselves become mothers, what do they get? .... In those days there would be no food in
the house, not even the water leftover from boiling rice, to satiate the fire of hunger raging inside
the belly of the new mother”(pg,57). "A mahar woman would continue to give birth till she
reached menopause”, this line gives us a perfect insight of the mahar women. She further says in
the work ,"They had to cover themselves fully if they saw any man from the higher casts coming
down the road,when he came close, they had to say’ the humble Mahar women fall at your feet
master’. This was likea chant, which they had to repeat innumerable times, even to a small child
if it belonged to a higher caste”.(52). She says how a man would shame them , "Look at the
bhakris this slut has prepared. She cannot even make a few bhakris properly. Oh, well, what can
one expect of this daughter of a dunce? (94)." The author writes that outside the mahalwada,
mahar women had to bow and proclaim their submission to all passing upper-caste men. The
oppressive entanglement of caste and patriarchy has resulted in men living outside the
community, higher caste women, and sometimes Mahari women themselves, inflicting
humiliating experiences on other Mahari women and their children. It's evident from the way in
which they have pushed the boundaries of their personal lives together to ensure their survival.
And to ensure the care of children. However, in public spheres, the upper castes have made great
efforts to limit the movement of Dalit women. Caste and untouchable social practices allowed
mahar women to work for minimal wages. But the products of their labor are purchased by upper
caste households. They refuse to touch it , if these items have visible spots on their bodies. It was
in the time ashaad that they got a tiny bit of happiness. It was one of the years when a buffalo
was sacrificed and the whole community feasted and ate together. It was believed that women
could be possessed by the goddess and therefore treated equally as mother goddesses by men,
women and children. Even her husband bowed at her feet and asked for good omens eventhough
it was very ironical. The narrator writes that this prison of ignorance was purposely closed
because the upper castes were unwilling to control education and allow mahars and other lower
castes access to knowledge ( Kamble 37). When Mahal's children went to school, they were also
subjected to severe humiliation. She gives such real life account of how their community was
marginalized ,her stories are from her life which makes it more disturbing and dark. Towards the
end of the work she shows us how Ambedkar and his ideologies helped them to liberate
Thus we can see how Kamble portrays the miserable life of her
community and how much neglected they were , she also uses her work to disclose how two
elements can intersect to make a Dalit women double marginalized . Here it is evident that cast
and gender intersect , several instances that are available in the text are pointing towards the
same , thus her text cannot be just viewed as a personal work but can be viewed as a general
account of the situation of Dlait women. By the analysis that was done on the text , the evidence
of the double marginalization are very much visible and we can conclude that the text is a prime
example on how a particular class of people are harassed on the basis of things that they are not
in control of , and it is clear that how conventional feminism was not able to address the social
evil. Leaving the major portion of women population to the clutches of several levels of