Professional Documents
Culture Documents
HEAD
Most of the noise from the cartridge will be
generated by random thermally excited
vibration of the charged particles in the coil
AMP
wire, and can be calculated as:
DESIGN
where 4KT = 1.61 x10 -20 at 290°K.
Thus, if our cartridge has a DC resistance of
20 ohms, the noise voltage will be about
84nV measured with a20kHz noise
bandwidth. We should aim to reduce the
noise generated by other components to this
Stan Curtis theorises level, but there is little benefit, for example, in
reducing the amplifier noise to a level below
and offers a practical circuit
that generated by the cartridge unless we can
also find a way of reducing its noise ( dipping
it in liquid nitrogen perhaps!). Fig. 3 shows
the noise model of the fig. 1b circuit.
N 1980 Iundertook a project to design an This shunt feedback arrangement has one
I advanced moving- coil preamplifier stage. or two other advantages over the usual series
This represented my tenth commercially feedback circuits. No consideration of input
produced headamp and Idecided that the matching need be made. The whole subject
time had come to design acircuit which was of loading moving- coil cartridges is far more
as close to the theoretical ideal as could be involved than first impressions suggest,
achieved with present day semiconductors. although some writers imply that a moving-
Although this project work required the coil cartridge works equally well into virtually
development of a high- specification ( noise, Conventional headamp arrangement fusing any loading network. Ihave undertaken
linearity, bandwidth, etc) amplifier stage, series feedback) considerable research into the subject, but
equal consideration was given to the tech- FIG 2 this new design conveniently bypasses the
nique of matching the head- amp to both the problem through the use of an effective short
cartridge and the associated phono preamp. (provided feedback resistor R2 is purely circuit ( for AC signals) across the cartridge,
The result is a moving- coil preamplifier of resistive). In the past year or two other ie, between true ground and avirtual ground
superb specification and novel concept. This designs have appeared using broadly the existing at the junction of RC and R2 ( fig. Ib).
article discusses the background to the design same current- sensing principles. In particular Thus the cartridge is also very well electrically
and presents asimplified version for home the latest moving- coil stages used in Thres- damped. Another factor of interest is the
constructors. hold and Meridian pre- amplifiers are of a cartridge-dependent gain of the stage. With
The circuit technique used is developed similar arrangement. the voltage gain being equal to - R2/RC the
from ashunt feedback arrangement which With this shunt feedback circuit the car- gain will vary according to the cartridge
was originally unique to one of my earlier tridge is not loaded by any matching' re- design. Fortunately (as agross generalisation)
designs. Fig. Iashows the simplified circuit sistor; indeed the concept of electrical the high output cartridge types have lots of
of a moving- coil preamp ( the Braithwaite matching ceases to matter. Thus the ST17 turns and therefore high DC resistances, and
ST17) which Idesigned in 1977. It will be was able to be promoted as a ' universal' this causes the gain to be low. Low- output
seen that the overall gain is established by preamp. With conventional input loading, fig.
shunt feedback and is equal to - R2/R1. 2, there will always be asignal loss, albeit
small. For example, a20 ohm cartridge may
Eno
be loaded by the 100 ohm input impedance,
r
2c"de of the headamp. This loading will reduce
the signal voltage by afactor 100/120 or
1.6 dB.
However, to return to the shunt feedback
arrangement, it will be seen that this elimin-
voltage gain
RI. RC ates one of the dominant input noise sources.
Equivalent input noise:
Irrespective of whether the feedback is shunt
En 2 va Ens 2 .En 2 (1• F
4) 2 • In 2 RC 2 • I - )2
ST I?
or series, resistor R1 will always be a noise
R C
A) simplified circuit of 1977 Braithwaite
R2
source effectively in series with the input. By NOISE MODEL of FIG.10 CIRCUIT
voltage gam V.
I _
13) sirriplified circuit of 1978 Braithwaite 5117
FIG1
Weçl
( fol OUTPUT
nected its own internal resistance becomes
part of R1 so that the gain is now o
-R2/R1+ RC. The original value of R1 was
12 ohms, but it soon became apparent that INPUT