Professional Documents
Culture Documents
I ICIII-v Louis
Ilm'b'm m? 0m,
FrIcd
:.,?:.
J? t o) i Cor(/
?EM:
Alldrc,-,ts Hmsscii
n2 Brk)-id 1)(diel-tv
(Ind bod(I
jamcs A. W. ficl'I'CrImil
Frmikciistciji mid Film
0 ? MR,:
I Mm?:?
?0, N.::
jcrclli\? GJIIhcI-t-R()It'c
JCH'IvN? T. 'S('1111('1pp
0)1
Frcd1-1(' IMM-11?)MI
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:45:57 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Front Matter
Source: Critical Inquiry, Vol. 24, No. 1 (Autumn, 1997)
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1344156
Accessed: 14-11-2022 13:45 UTC
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to Critical Inquiry
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:45:57 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Critical
$8.00 Inquiry
Editor W. J. T. Mitchell
Executive Editor Arnold I. Davidson
Coeditors Joel Snyder Frangoise Meltzer
Elizabeth Helsinger Bill Brown
Lauren Berlant Homi Bhabha
Email:jww4@midway.uchicago.edu
World Wide Web URL:
http: //www2.uchicago.edu/jnl-crit-inq/
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:45:57 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Critical
Inquiry
Autumn 1997, Volume 24, Number 1
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:45:57 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Critical
Inquiry
Published four times a year in Autumn, Winter, Spring, and Summer.
Copying Beyond Fair Use. The code on the first page of an article in this journal
indicates the copyright owner's consent that copies of the article may be made
beyond those permitted by Sections 107 or 108 of the U.S. Copyright Law pro-
vided that copies are made only for personal or internal use, or for the personal
or internal use of specific clients and provided that the copier pay the stated per-
copy fee through the Copyright Clearance Center, Inc. Operations Center, 27
Congress Street, Salem, Massachusetts 01970. To request permission for other
kinds of copying, such as copying for general distribution, for advertising or pro-
motional purposes, for creating new collective works, or for resale, kindly write
to Permissions Department, The University of Chicago Press, 5801 S. Ellis Ave.,
Chicago, Illinois 60637. If no code appears on the first page of an article, permis-
sion to reprint may be obtained only from the author.
Advertising space in Critical Inquiry is available, as is rental of its subscriber list. For
information and rates, please contact the advertising sales staff, The University
of Chicago Press, Journals Division, 5720 S. Woodlawn Avenue, Chicago, Illinois
60637. Advertising and list rental is limited to material of scholarly interest to
our subscribers.
The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the
American National Standard for Information Sciences-Permanence of Paper
for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39. 48-1984.GTM
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:45:57 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Harlem on Our Minds
Author(s): Henry Louis Gates, Jr.
Source: Critical Inquiry , Autumn, 1997, Vol. 24, No. 1 (Autumn, 1997), pp. 1-12
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1344157
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Critical Inquiry
The real fever of love for the place will begin to take hold upon him.
The subtle, insidious wine of New York will begin to intoxicate
him. Then, if he is wise, he will go away, any place-yes, he will even
go over to Jersey. But if he be a fool, he will stay and stay on until
the town becomes all in all to him; until the very streets are his chums
and certain buildings and corners his best friends. Then he is hope-
less, and to live elsewhere would be death. The Bowery will be his
romance, Broadway his lyric, and the Park his pastoral, the river and
the glory of it all his epic, and he will look down pityingly on all the
rest of humanity.
-PAUL LAURENCE DUNBAR
It was loving the City that distracted me and gave me ideas. Made
me think I could speak its loud voice and make the sound human. I
missed the people altogether.
-TONI MORRISON
The idea of a black renaissance has a long and curious history in Ameri-
can culture.
Writing in Lippincott's Magazine in 1889, an anonymous reviewer, la-
menting the absence of the Great American Novel, predicted that a truly
sublime American literature would be created not by a man but by a
woman, and an African American woman at that:
Fate keeps revenge in store. It was a woman who, taking the wrongs
of the African as her theme, wrote the novel that awakened the world
to their reality, and why should not the coming novelist be a woman
as well as an African? She-the woman of that race-has some claims
on Fate which are not yet paid up.
This artist, the reviewer went on to predict, would emerge at the forefront
of a bold new movement in the arts, a veritable renaissance in blackface.
With Toni Morrison's receipt of the 1993 Nobel Prize in literature and
the unprecedented number of black artists at work in so many genres
today, it is difficult not to recognize the signs that African Americans are
in the midst of a cultural renaissance.
Today's African American renaissance is the fourth such movement
in the arts in this century. It is also the most successful and the most
sustained. The first occurred at the turn of the century. In 1901, the black
Bostonian William Stanley Braithwaite, a distinguished critic and poet,
argued that "we are at the commencement of a 'negroid' renaissance ...
that will have as much importance in literary history as the much spoken
of and much praised Celtic and Canadian renaissance." At the end of a
full decade of unprecedented literary productions by black women-who
published a dozen novels and edited their own literary journal between
1890 and 1900-and precisely when the poet Paul Laurence Dunbar, the
novelists Pauline Hopkins and Charles Chesnutt, and the essayists
W. E. B. Du Bois and Anna Julia Cooper were at the height of their cre-
ative powers, a critic in The A. M. E. Church Review in 1904 declared the
birth of "The New Negro Literary Movement," likening it, as had Braith-
waite, to the Celtic renaissance.
It was Booker T. Washington who first hoped to institutionalize the
cultural and political force of this New Negro. In 1900 Washington en-
listed several of his fellows (including his nemesis, Du Bois) to construct
an image unfettered by the racist burdens of the past, a past character-
ized by two-and-a-half centuries of slavery and nearly half a century of
disenfranchisement, peonage, black codes, and legalized Jim Crow-not
to mention the vicious assault on negro freedom and political rights en-
acted in literature, in theater and on the vaudeville stage, and through-
out the popular visual arts, in the form of a blanket of demeaning
stereotypes of deracinated, ugly, treacherous, hauntingly evil Sambo im-
ages. At the beginning of the century, families could encounter these
images throughout their homes from the time they turned off their
alarm clocks in the morning and sat down to their egg cups or tea cosies,
napkin rings or place mats at breakfast, to the time they spent in the
evenings playing parlor games, reading advertisements in magazines, or
addressing U.S. government postcards. Such an onslaught of stereotypes,
reinforced subliminally in advertisements and on trading cards, in pulpits
on Sundays, and even in the law, demanded resistance and an organized
response. "We must turn away from the memories of the slave past,"
Washington demanded, no doubt with this proliferation of negations of
black humanity in mind. "A New Negro for a New Century," he argued,
would be the answer.
This New Negro movement, which took at least three forms before
Alain Locke enshrined it in the Harlem Renaissance in 1925, drew its
artistic inspiration from across the Atlantic in Europe. First, Anton Dvo-
rak in the early 1890s declared spirituals America's first authentic contri-
bution to world culture and urged classical composers to draw upon them
to create sui generis symphonies. A decade later, Pablo Picasso stumbled
onto "dusky Manikins" at an ethnographic museum and forever trans-
formed European art, as well as Europe's official appreciation of the art
from the African continent. Picasso's Les Demoiselles d'Avignon (1906-7)-
the signature event in the creation of cubism-stands as a testament to
the shaping influence of African sculpture and to the central role that
African art played in the creation of modernism. The cubist mask of mod-
ernism covers a black Bantu face. African art-ugly, primitive, debased
in 1900; sublime, complex, valorized by 1910-was transformed so dra-
matically in the cultural imagination of the West, in such an astonishingly
short period, that the potential for the political uses of black art and liter-
ature in America could not escape the notice of African American intellec-
tuals, especially Du Bois, himself educated in Europe and cosmopolitan
to the core, and Locke, the Harvard-trained philosopher, who went to
Oxford as a Rhodes scholar in 1907, the year after Picasso stumbled un-
cannily onto the African sublime, and who studied aesthetics in Germany
in the heady years of the modernist explosion. If European modernism
was truly mulatto, the argument went, then African Americans could save
themselves politically through the creation of the arts. This renaissance,
the second and most famous in black history, would fully liberate the
Negro-at least its advanced guard.
The Harlem or New Negro Renaissance was born through the mid-
wifery of Locke, who edited a special issue of Survey Graphic magazine
entitled "Harlem: Mecca of the New Negro" in March of 1925, which
was followed by the 446-page anthology The New Negro: An Interpretation,
replete with illustrations by the German expressionist Winold Reiss and
the African American Aaron Douglas. Writers such as Langston Hughes,
Jean Toomer, Countee Cullen, Jessie Fauset, and Zora Neale Hurston-
the fundaments of the black canon today-came of age at this time, lead-
ing the New York Herald Tribune to announce that America was "on the
edge, if not already in the midst, of what might not improperly be called
a Negro renaissance." Locke liked the term, too: part 1 of his anthology
is called "The Negro Renaissance." Locke even urged young black visual
artists to imitate the European modernist, so heavily influenced by sub-
Saharan African art. "By being modern," Locke declared, with no hint of
irony, "we are being African."
For Locke and his fellow authors, the function of a cultural renais-
sance was inherently political: the production of great artworks, by
blacks, in sufficient numbers, would lead to the Negro's "reevaluation by
white and black alike." And this reevaluation would facilitate the Negro's
demand for civil rights and for social and economic equality. Stopped
short by the 1929 stock market crash, which hurt the white patrons upon
whom the Renaissance was so dependent, the Renaissance writers (a tiny
group, numbering perhaps fifty), whom Locke thought of as "the Negro's
cultural adolescence," were never able to nurture black art to its formal
adulthood, nor were they able to usher in the new world of civil rights
through art.
The third renaissance was the Black Arts movement, which lasted
from 1965 to the early seventies. Defining themselves against the Harlem
Renaissance and deeply rooted in black cultural nationalism, the Black
Arts writers saw themselves as the artistic wing of the Black Power move-
ment. Writers such as Amiri Baraka, Larry Neal, and Sonia Sanchez saw
black art as fulfilling a function, primarily the political liberation of black
people from white racism. Constructed on a fragile foundation of the
overtly political, this renaissance was the most short-lived of all. Yet many
of the artists who have come of age in the decades since were shaped or
deeply influenced by this period. By 1975, with the Black Arts movement
dead (Baraka had become a Marxist in 1973), Black Studies departments
in peril, and a homogenized disco music on the rise, many of us won-
dered if black culture were not undergoing some sort of profound iden-
tity crisis. A decade later, however, black writers, visual artists, musicians,
dancers, and actors would enter a period of creativity unrivaled in Ameri-
can history.
Critics date the current renaissance variously, some tracing its origins
to the resurgence of black women's literature and criticism in the early
eighties, especially in the works of Ntozake Shange, Michele Wallace, Al-
ice Walker, and Toni Morrison. These women and their successors were
able, simultaneously, to reach a large, traditionally middle-class, white
female readership plus a new black female audience that had been largely
untapped. The growth of this community of readers has resulted in an
unrivalled number of novels by and about black women since 1980, as
well as an unprecedentedly large African American market for books
about every aspect of the black experience. While it is always arbitrary to
try to date a cultural movement, it seems reasonable to note an upsurge
in black creativity in 1987, the year in which August Wilson's Fences pre-
miered on Broadway and Toni Morrison published her masterpiece, Be-
loved. Both would receive Pulitzer Prizes. In that same year, PBS aired
Henry Hampton's Eyes on the Prize, the six-part documentary of the civil
rights era; Cornell scholar Martin Bernal published Black Athena, a bold
revisionist history that locates the origins of classical Greek civilization in
Africa. As Nelson George says in his Buppies, B-boys, Baps, and Bohos: Notes
on Post-Soul Black Culture, T-shirts with slogans such as "Black By Popular
Demand" and "It's A Black Thing, You Wouldn't Understand" spread
across the nation from predominately black colleges. Moreover, the rap
revolution was well under way at about this time. Meanwhile, Spike Lee
and Wynton Marsalis were establishing themselves as masters of film and
jazz. Since that year, the production of cultural artifacts in virtually every
field and genre has been astonishing.
The grandchildren of Du Bois's "Talented Tenth," those who were
able to profit from the affirmative action programs implemented in the
late sixties that are facing such a harsh onslaught today, have thus for the
past decade been in the midst of a great period of artistic productivity,
much of it centered in New York. The signs of cultural vibrancy are un-
mistakable: in dance, Bill T. Jones and Judith Jamison; in literature, Toni
Morrison and Terry McMillan, Walter Mosley and John Edgar Wideman;
in drama, August Wilson; in poetry, Rita Dove; in opera, Anthony Davis
and Thulani Davis; in jazz, Wynton Marsalis and Cassandra Wilson; pub-
lic intellectuals such as Cornel West and bell hooks, Greg Tate and Lisa
Jones; the visual artists Martin Puryear and Lorna Simpson; the rap mu-
sicians Public Enemy and Queen Latifah; the filmmakers Spike Lee, Julie
Dash, and John Singleton-the list is stunningly long. From television to
op-ed pages, from the academy to hip-hop, never before have so many
black artists and intellectuals achieved so much success in so very many
fields. Do their efforts amount to a renaissance?
"It depends on how you define 'renaissance,'" Cornel West has ar-
gued. "The rebirth by means of a recovery of classical heritage, I wouldn't
call it that. What we do have, however, is a high-quality ferment, a prolif-
eration of a variety of new voices that are transgressing the boundaries in
place. These artists exhibit a certain kind of self-confidence, a refusal to
accept the belief that they have to prove themselves. Artists such as
Wright and Baldwin clearly wrestled on a different terrain."
A different terrain, indeed. Since 1968, when the civil rights move-
ment, a century old, ended so abruptly with the murder of Dr. King,
affirmative action and entitlement programs have dramatically affected the
black community's collective economic health. Not only has the size of
its middle class quadrupled since 1968 but, according to the 1990 cen-
sus, almost as many blacks between the ages of 25 and 44 are college
graduates as are high school dropouts, whereas "just twenty years ago,
there were five times as many black high school dropouts as college grad-
uates in the workforce," as Sam Roberts reported in the New York Times
on 18 June 1995. Between 1970 and 1990, moreover, the percentage of
blacks who had attended some college increased from 9.1 percent to 33.2
percent, of those graduating from college from 5.1 percent to 11 percent,
the highest in history, and of those with some postgraduate work from
1.2 percent to 4.1 percent. By 1989, 1 in 7 black families were middle
class (earning $50,000 or more), compared to 1 in 3 white families. 'Just a
generation ago," Roberts writes, "only 1 in 17 black families" could claim
middle-class status; the increase is clearly the result of governmental
"prodding." For African Americans, however, it is the best of times and
the most worst of times. While part of the black community has experi-
enced two decades of unprecedented growth, another part lags dramati-
cally behind. Black America has simultaneously the largest middle class
and the largest underclass in its history. And the current renaissance of
black art and culture-with its inherent schisms and tensions-is un-
folding against this conflicted socioeconomic backdrop. Let us pursue
this paradox.
Despite their remarkable gains, a certain sense of precariousness
haunts the new black middle class and the art that it consumes. Its own
economic uplift remains perilously novel. An ambivalent romance with
the street and b-boy culture-an intimacy, a freshness, but also a sense
that one could go back "there" at any time-haunts much contemporary
black literature, film, and hip-hop. The partition between the classes, in
the minds of many blacks, is as thin as rice paper.
But because the shtetl memory, as it were, is still so very recent, the
romanticization of the ghetto is accompanied by its demonization. The
movement to censor gangsta rap, for instance, can be seen as part of
the black bourgeoisie's anxiety, its deep-seated fear that it, too, is just one
or two paychecks away from the fate of the underclass. The black middle
class defines itself by consumption, but it is never free from the past and
presence of racism. In fact, it often defines itself against this very history.
The nature and size of the new black middle class is significant here
because of what it implies about patronage and the economics of black
art: whereas the Harlem Renaissance writers were almost totally depen-
dent upon the whims of white patrons who marketed their works to a
predominately white readership, the sales of some of the most phenome-
nally successful black authors, such as Terry McMillan, the Delaney
sisters, Toni Morrison, and Alice Walker, are being sustained to an un-
precedented degree by black consumers. The same is true, if to a lesser
extent, in the other arts. Thelma Golden's "Black Male" exhibit, for in-
stance, dramatically lifted annual attendance figures at the Whitney Mu-
seum by attracting a large number of new black patrons. The rise of the
black middle class is, thus, simultaneous with the rise of black art, espe-
cially the black novel. And black novelists-black women novelists in par-
ticular-seem to owe a large part of their appeal to their capacity to
express the desires and anxieties of this new middle class more freely
from the inside than any previous generation could possibly have done.
(In this way, McMillan's role within black culture is similar to that of Defoe
and Richardson in the eighteenth century.) Quite often, too, these black
writers have black editors and black agents, and their books are reviewed
by other black authors, assigned by black teachers, and sold in black
bookstores.
This new presence and authority of blacks in cultural institutions,
largely a result of affirmative action programs and the active recruitment
of minorities, is unprecedented in American history. And signs of the cul-
tural flowering that define a renaissance are everywhere. On two occa-
sions in the past two years, no less than three black authors appeared
simultaneously on the New York Times best seller list (one author, Toni Mor-
rison, appeared in both the fiction and nonfiction categories). "All black
books these days are trade books," commented Erroll McDonald, a Yale
graduate and vice president at Pantheon Books. "The 'one-nigger syn-
drome' is dead." Black authors have won an unprecedented number of
prizes in the last decade, including Pulitzer Prizes, National Book Critics'
Circle Awards, National Book Awards, and PEN/Faulkner Awards. The
culmination of these achievements, of course, was Toni Morrison's No-
bel Prize.
In addition, traditionally white cultural institutions such as the Whit-
ney Museum, the Museum of Modern Art, the Guggenheim Museum,
and the Lincoln Center Theater have integrated their boards of directors,
and jazz has become a part of the canon of American music as defined by
both the Lincoln Center and the Smithsonian Institution. Black Studies
departments have never had larger enrollments or a stronger, more solid
presence at America's premier research institutions. Public intellectuals
representing a wide array of ideologies, such as Gerald Early, Cornel
West, Stephen Carter, Derrick Bell, Lani Guinier, Stanley Crouch, Mi-
chele Wallace, bell hooks, Trey Ellis, Shelby Steele, Randall Kennedy, and
Patricia Williams, publish their opinions regularly in a variety of national
journals. George Wolfe's appointment as the director of the New York
Public Theater is symptomatic of the growing "crossover" authority that
blacks increasingly have come to possess within broader American cul-
tural organizations. And, perhaps most dramatically of all, black film-
makers, following the lead of Spike Lee, have never been more numerous
or better funded than they are today. If we add television shows such as
The Cosby Show, A Different World, The Fresh Prince of Bel Air, and The Oprah
Winfrey Show to the mix, it is clear that the black presence in American
society has never been more prevalent and more widely consumed.
One reason for the newest renaissance is that the generation that
integrated historically white institutions in the late sixties and early sev-
enties has now, two decades later, returned to those very institutions to
occupy positions of power and authority. Never before have so many
black creative artists produced so much art, in so many genres, for such
a diversified, integrated audience. Case in point: hip-hop, once the
hands from over our mouths, and you hear this long, piercing scream.
There really isn't much that is new to say about being a white person."
This art, she continues, is appealing not just because of its content but
because of its forms, "its ways of looking at the world, the way the world
has forced us to look at it. And what we, as artists, are saying is: 'this is
what it looks like.'"
Traditionally, black art has fallen into two large schools of representa-
tion. One we might think of as a lyrical, quasi-autobiographical modern-
ism (as found, say, in Zora Neale Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God
or Ralph Ellison's Invisible Man), in which a questing protagonist succeeds
against oppressive racist odds. The other we can call realism or natural-
ism (as found, for instance, in Richard Wright's Native Son or Ann Petry's
The Street), in which a protagonist's life choices, and hence fate, are deter-
mined by forces, such as racism or capitalism, which are insurmount-
able-that is, unless the entire system is transformed by violent and
dramatic revolution.
In black postmodernist writing, much of the fiction being created by
black women in particular consists of coming-of-age tales in which racial
politics takes a secondary role to the unfolding of a sensitive, gendered
consciousness. Today, a politicized naturalism is more likely to be found
in black film, such as John Singleton's Boyz N the Hood, and, of course, in
gangsta rap, such as the dada vorticism of Public Enemy's It Takes a Nation
of Millions to Hold Us Back, or in the rap-meets-poetry movement. The
most subtle and sophisticated of this art, however, such as Toni Morrison's
masterpiece Beloved, or Spike Lee's Do the Right Thing, brings both tenden-
cies together, creating a new form, which we might think of as a lyrical
super-naturalism.
All renaissances are acts of cultural construction, attempting to sat-
isfy larger social and political needs. And the African American postmod-
ern renaissance is no exception. In their openness, their variety, their
playfulness with forms, their refusal to follow preordained ideological
lines, their sustained engagements with the black artistic past, the artists
of this renaissance seem as determined to define their work freely within
a black tradition as they are to consolidate a black presence within Ameri-
ca's corporate cultural institutions. "There are many neighborhoods in
what we might think of as a larger cultural community," Anthony Davis
muses. Given the sophistication of so much of this art, and given its dem-
onstrated power to turn a profit, it is highly likely that the achievements
of this renaissance will be the deepest, the longest-lasting, and the most
appreciated by the larger American society. "Today the white people want
to be colored," Jamaica Kincaid asserts. "There is no longer such a thing
as an 'American' culture. It's all black culture."
What lessons from the Harlem Renaissance can we draw upon to
critique our own?
Many critiques have been made of the Harlem Renaissance's putative
so much a place as it was a state of mind, the cultural metaphor for black
America itself.
What does seem curious to me about the Harlem Renaissance-and
relevant to us here-is that its creation occurred precisely as Harlem was
turning into the great American slum. The death rate was 42 percent
higher than in other parts of the city. The infant mortality rate in 1928
was twice as high as in the rest of New York. Four times as many people
died from tuberculosis as in the white population. The unemployment
rate, according to Adam Clayton Powell, Jr., was 50 percent. There was no
way to romanticize these conditions, but Locke and his fellows valiantly
attempted to do so. Even James Weldon Johnson, one of the most politi-
cally engaged of all the Renaissance writers in his capacity as the first
black secretary of the NAACP, wrote Black Manhattan to create the fiction
of Harlem as a model of civility and black bourgeois respectability, rather
than as an example of the most heinous effects of urban economic exploi-
tation and residential segregation. For Johnson, Harlem was "exotic, col-
orful, sensuous; a place of laughing, singing, and dancing; a place where
life wakes up at night." Moreover, he continued, "Harlem is not merely a
Negro colony or community, it is a city within a city, the greatest Negro
city in the world. It is not a slum or a fringe, it is located in the heart of
Manhattan and occupies one of the most beautiful and healthful sections
of the city." Locke, always an optimist, whom Charles Johnson called "the
press agent of the New Negro," declared Harlem the cultural capital of
the black world: "Without pretense to their political significance, Harlem
has the same role to play for the New Negro as Dublin had for the New
Ireland or Prague for the New Czechoslovakia. Harlem, I grant you, isn't
typical-but it is significant, it is prophetic." The "Harlem" of literature
and the Harlem of socioeconomic reality were as far apart as Bessie Smith
was from Paul Whiteman. The valorization of black rhythm, spontaneity,
laughter, sensuality-all keywords of depictions of blacks by blacks at the
time-contrasted starkly with Harlem's squalor and the environmental
or structural limitations upon individual choices such as those finally de-
picted in Wright's Native Son (1940) in part as a reaction against what he
felt to be the Renaissance writers' bohemian decadence.
The Renaissance's fascination with primitivism, one could argue, has
today found a counterpart in three arenas of representation: the recon-
struction of the institution of slavery; the valorization of vernacular
cultural forms as a basis for a postmodern art; and the use of a lyrical
voice-of-becoming in fictions that depict the emergence of black female
protagonists with strong, resonant voices and self-fashioned identities.
Subjects heretofore to be avoided-such as slavery and the female tale of
the transcendence and emergence of the self-and vernacular linguistic
forms have all emerged like the return of the repressed as dominant
themes in African American literature. What remains to be explored,
however, in the written arts of this renaissance, are the lives and times of
the grandchildren of the Bigger Thomases and Bessie Mearses of Native
Son, which by and large have been of interest primarily to young black
filmmakers, who far too often seem to be caught in the embrace of a
romantic primitivism, navigating us through the inner city more for sex-
ual titillation than for social critique. Given the stark statistics that we all
know so well describing the nightmare reality of black inner-city life-
one in three black men between the ages of 20 and 29 in prison, on pro-
bation, or on parole; 46 percent of all black children born at or beneath
the poverty line-one is forced to wonder where this generation's Bigger
Thomas is. Until this subject matter finds a voice as eloquent as that voice
of the newly emergent and aspiring middle-class black self, today's renais-
sance runs the risk of suffering the sorts of critique that we level against
the Harlem Renaissance seven full decades later. For there are two na-
tions in America, and these two nations, one hopeless, one full of hope,
are both black. African Americans live a hyphenated life in America. Mor-
rison's Beloved explores what the hyphenation of race costs. It is incum-
bent upon our artists now to explore what the hyphenation of class costs.
Perhaps it is no accident that the most interesting rendering of the
tension between the myth of Harlem and its social reality is to be found
not in a text produced in that period but in Morrison's Jazz, which is set
in Harlem in 1926. In this novel Morrison succeeds in creating a protago-
nist whose fate is as shaped by her environment as by her actions, in a
curious kind of stasis or equilibrium that seeks to resolve the tension be-
tween the naturalism of Richard Wright and Ann Petry on the one hand,
and the lyrical modernism of Jean Toomer, Zora Neale Hurston, and
Ralph Ellison on the other. "Word was," Morrison's narrator tells us, "that
underneath the good times and the easy money something evil ran the
streets and nothing was safe-not even the dead." It is in this novel that
the Harlem Renaissance finally finds its most sophisticated voice and its
most pointed critique, the newest renaissance grounding itself in the mir-
ror of the old, bridging that gap between the shadow and the act, the
myth and the reality, the fiction and the fact. Morrison's ultimate message
would seem to be a warning, a warning that it is only when our artists
today speak the city's "loud voice and make that sound human," avoiding
"miss[ing] the people altogether," in all their complexity, that this renais-
sance can claim to be the renaissance to end all renaissances. Much de-
pends on whether we get it.
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1344158?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Critical Inquiry
Michael Fried
This essay was first drafted as a lecture for a symposium in honor of the late Louis Marin
held at Johns Hopkins University on 12-13 November 1993. Since then I have presented it
also at the University of California, Berkeley (as the first of two Una's Lectures), the Johns
Hopkins Villa Spelman in Florence, Columbia University, the University of Chicago, the
Walters Art Gallery, Tufts University, Aalborg University, the Getty Research Institute for
the History of Art and the Humanities, Iowa University, Ohio State University, Humboldt
University in Berlin, the National Gallery in London, and the Temple Program in Rome.
On all those occasions I profited from postlecture discussions, but two follow-up seminars,
at Berkeley and at the Getty, were particularly stimulating. My thanks to Tom Laqueur and
Michael S. Roth respectively for arranging them, and to T. J. Clark and Richard Wollheim
(at Berkeley) and Roth and Salvatore Settis (at the Getty), among others, for helpful com-
ments and suggestions. I also owe special thanks to my Johns Hopkins colleagues Elizabeth
Cropper and Charles Dempsey for supporting my work on Caravaggio from the first. Elena
Calvillo, an advanced graduate student in the Johns Hopkins department of the history of
13
art, gave me expert assistance with the notes, for which she has my gratitude. Finally, in the
course of preparing this essay for publication I reread after nearly fifteen years an unpub-
lished paper by Professor Sheila McTighe of Columbia University, written when she was a
graduate student at Yale, entitled "The Mirror of Narcissus: Beholder and Beheld in Cara-
vaggio's Early Work," in which she argues that various early paintings by Caravaggio, includ-
ing the Boy Bitten by a Lizard, were intended to function as virtual mirrors that would fix the
viewer before his image-at once shocking the viewer "into a single, timeless moment of
wonder" and "[absorbing him] into the study of naturalistic detail." This is significantly
different from my claims in the present essay, but we are in agreement as to the centrality
of the mirror "analogy" (her word) or dispositif (mine) in Caravaggio's art.
1. The version of the Boy Bitten by a Lizard now in the Longhi Foundation was pub-
lished (and later purchased) by Roberto Longhi in 1928 and 1929; see Longhi, "Quesiti
caravaggeschi: I, Registro dei tempi" and "II, I precedenti," Pinacotheca 1 (July-Aug. 1928):
17-33 and (Mar.-June 1929): 258-320; republished together in Opere complete di Roberto Lon-
ghi, 14 vols. (Florence, 1956- ), 4:81-143; see pp. 85, 114, 124. The other widely accepted
version, now in the National Gallery of London and the focus of my remarks in the first
part of this essay, was first published by Tancred Borenius, "An Early Caravaggio Rediscov-
ered," Apollo 2 (1925): 23-26. Although only the London picture appeared in the 1985
Caravaggio exhibition, both versions were discussed in the catalog entry by Mina Gregori;
see The Age of Caravaggio (exhibition catalog, Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 5
Feb.-14 Apr. 1985; Museo Nazionale di Capodimonte, Naples, 12 May-30 June 1985), pp.
236-41; hereafter abbreviated AC. Richard E. Spear's "The Critical Fortune of a Realist
Painter" in that catalog (pp. 22-27) provides a helpful discussion of the Boy Bitten by a Lizard
in relation to recent Caravaggio scholarship. For Caravaggio's biography according to the
extant documents and a thorough catalog of his surviving paintings, see Mia Cinotti, Michel-
angelo Merisi detto il Caravaggio: Tutte le opere (Bergamo, 1983). Cinotti prefers the Longhi
Foundation Boy Bitten by a Lizard to the London version; see pp. 435-37. The dates of indi-
vidual works given in this essay are drawn from recent scholarship on the painter, but in
many cases the question of dating remains open.
2. Giovanni Baglione, Le vite de' pittori, scultori, et architetti dal Pontificato di Gregorio XIII
del 1572 infino a' tempi di Papa Urbano Ottavo nel 1642, ed. Jacob Hess and Herwarth Rdttgen,
:??ii??;i;
:?~??
~::~:??
;~~~?
?~?:
iii:'
"*""
iiil* "*?
:: ''"':
??a;:
%i
;r i
::""-:'
% ' *, -?
1::
:::?:?
:;*;:?;:??;??
??-~
.~.
Poi and6 a stare in casa del Cavalier Gioseppe Cesari d'Arpino per alcuni mesi.
Indi provb a stare da se stesso, e fece alcuni quadretti da lui nello specchio ritratti.
Et il primo fu un Bacco con alcuni grappoli d'uve diverse, con gran diligenza fatte;
ma di maniera un poco secca. Fece anche un fanciullo, che da una lucerta, la quale
usciva da fiori, e da frutti, era morso; e parea quella testa veramente stridere, ed il
tutto con diligenza era lavorato.
The Italian text is reprinted along with an English translation by Walter Friedlaender, Cara-
vaggio Studies (Princeton, N.J., 1955), pp. 231-36, hereafter abbreviated CS; and by Howard
Hibbard, Caravaggio (New York, 1983), pp. 351-56; hereafter abbreviated C. I have followed
Hibbard's translation.
3. For Hibbard's discussion of the painting, see C, pp. 43-46. For Caravaggio's work
in the context of seicento poetry, see Eugenio Battisti, Rinascimento e Barocco (Turin, 1960),
pp. 213-14 n. 3; Luigi Salerno, "Poesia e simboli nel Caravaggio: I dipinti emblematici,"
Palatino 10 (1966): 107; and Elizabeth Cropper, "The Petrifying Art: Marino's Poetry and
Caravaggio," Metropolitan MuseumJournal 26 (1991): 193-212. For a Christological interpre-
tation of the painting, see Maurizio Calvesi, "Caravaggio o la ricerca della salvazione," Storia
dell'arte, no. 9/10 (1971): 93-142, 106-8. For the painting as an emblem of the choleric
temperament, see Leonard J. Slatkes, "Caravaggio's Painting of the Sanguine Tempera-
ment," in Actes du XXIIe congres international d'histoire de l'art (Budapest, 1969); Evolution giner-
ale et diveloppements rigionaux en histoire de l'art, 3 vols. (Budapest, 1972), 2:17-24, 24; and
"Caravaggio's Boy Bitten by a Lizard," Print Review, no. 5 (Spring 1976): 149-53. For the paint-
ing as a representation of the sense of touch, see Jane Costello, "Caravaggio, Lizard, and
Fruit," in Art the Ape of Nature: Studies in Honor of H. W Janson, ed. Moshe Barasch, Lucy
Freeman Sandler, and Patricia Egan (New York, 1981), p. 383.
4. Donald Posner, "Caravaggio's Homo-erotic Early Works," Art Quarterly 34 (Autumn
1971): 303, 304. See also C, p. 44; S. J. Freedberg, Circa 1600: A Revolution of Style in Italian
Painting (Cambridge, Mass., 1983), pp. 54, 59, 72, hereafter abbreviated 1600; and John
Gash, "Caravaggio, Michelangelo Merisi da," in The Dictionary of Art, ed. Jane Turner, 34
vols. (London, 1996), 5:702-22, esp. pp. 708 and 718-19.
5. See Creighton E. Gilbert, Caravaggio and His Two Cardinals (University Park, Pa.,
1995), esp. chap. 12, "Reports on Sexuality," and the concluding section, "Proposable Con-
clusions." Gilbert is particularly effective in refuting the modern assumption that Caravag-
gio's early patron Cardinal Del Monte was the center of a homosexual circle; see pp. 201-7.
6. See for example Cropper's sensitive discussion of the "sexually ambivalent" character
of works by both Caravaggio and the poet Giovan Battista Marino in "The Petrifying Art."
7. See Gilbert, Caravaggio's Two Cardinals, pp. 252-53.
8. In 1985 Gregori, citing Longhi, wrote that the subject of the Boy Bitten by a Lizard
should be understood
to other early works, including the so-called Bacchino Malato in the Bor-
ghese (which in the "Age of Caravaggio" exhibition of 1985 was renamed
Self-Portrait as Bacchus) and the Uffizi Bacchus, in which the protagonist's
facial features seem not to resemble Caravaggio's and yet (as we shall see)
the question of Caravaggio's "presence" in the canvas cannot be ruled
out. Let me say at once that I take the Boy Bitten by a Lizard to be essentially
a self-portrait made with the help of a mirror, but I also agree with those
writers (such as Louis Marin) who urge that we think of the issue of the
self-portrait in Caravaggio's oeuvre in a freer, less merely literal light, and
in any case the notion that the boy may be identified with the youthful
Caravaggio hardly begins to capture the complexities of the painting's
relation to its maker. A further point worth stressing is that the Boy Bitten
by a Lizard has been universally perceived, not without reason, as de-
picting a momentary or instantaneous state of affairs. Longhi, the fore-
most figure in Caravaggio scholarship, saw in it a demonstration of the
artist's skill in rendering "the fleeting moment in which sharp pain is
reflected in the boy's expression,"" while more recently the depicted ac-
tion has been described as "frozen in a fraction of a second, as in a snap-
shot."12 In this regard the painting has been assimilated to what is widely
approach." (Longhi adds that this was suggested to him by the painter Giorgio Morandi.)
In the same vein, Gregori writes that "the supposition that the present painting is a self-
portrait results from an erroneous interpretation of Baglione's remark" about Caravaggio's
use of a mirror (AC, p. 237); she agrees with Longhi that Baglione's reference to the mirror
is "to the widespread practice of employing a mirror as an aid in achieving a realistic repre-
sentation" (AC, pp. 241, 244). Cinotti, too, doesn't believe that the Boy Bitten by a Lizard is a
self-portrait; see her Caravaggio: La vitae l'opera (Bergamo, 1991), p. 25.
Finally, several recent publications confirm Caravaggio's interest in mirrors and opti-
cal phenomena in general even as they minimize the importance of self-portraiture in his
early practice. First, Roberta Lapucci infers from Baglione's statement that the young Cara-
vaggio painted "quadretti da lui nello specchio ritratti" that he made use of an optical device
of a sort described by his contemporary Giovan Battista Della Porta that would have been
capable of throwing a reversed image on a wall or canvas (Roberta Lapucci, "Caravaggio e i
'quadretti nello specchio ritratti,"' Paragone 45 [Mar.-July 1994]: 160-70). Second, Riccardo
Bassani and Fiora Bellini, commenting on a 1605 inventory of the painter's studio in Rome
that mentions "un specchio grande," "un scudo a specchio," and "undici pezzi de vetro"
(possibly lenses), emphasize what they take to have been Caravaggio's quasi-scientific or
experimental interest in light and reflections (Riccardo Bassani and Fiora Bellini, "La casa,
le 'robbe,' lo studio del Caravaggio a Roma: Due documenti inediti del 1603 e del 1605,"
Prospettiva, no. 71 Uuly 1993]: 69-70). See also Bassani and Bellini, Caravaggio assassino: La
carriera di un "valenthuomo" fazioso nella Roma della Controriforma (Rome, 1994), esp. pp. 35-43
(on the Boy Bitten by a Lizard) and pp. 201-5 (on the inventory of 1605). For both Lapucci
and Bassani and Bellini the question of self-portraiture is distinctly secondary. And, third,
Sandro Corradini in Caravaggio: Materiali per un processo (Rome, 1993), a compendium of
documents concerning Caravaggio's life and career, publishes the same inventory as that
cited and discussed by Bassani and Bellini; see pp. 62-64.
11. Longhi, Caravaggio, p. 55; quoted in translation by Spear, "The Critical Fortune
of a Realist Painter," in AC, p. 25.
12. Giorgio Bonsanti, Caravaggio (Florence, 1984), p. 6.
The artist's seeing of the model and the action of his hand that records the seeing
are absolutely immediate to his brush. His perception has been conveyed to the can-
vas without the intervention, or the consequent deliberation, of any studies in draw-
ing-in this he is unlike Annibale Carracci most conspicuously; and his process of
recording is as intense as it is direct. There is no precedent for this degree either of
intensity or directness in any prior art. The seeing impelled by this intensity grasps its
object and experiences it as if at highest speed, giving the effect of an instantaneous
apprehension of the whole. The act of apprehension is including and integral, a unity
as well as an instantaneity; and in this apprehension optical and tactile experience-
or, more precisely, the sense in the mind of tactile experience-have been fused,
reinforcing one another, absolutely interpenetrating, to make an effect which far ex-
ceeds that of either kind of experience by itself. [1600, p. 54]
15. See Henri Matisse: 1904-1917 (exhibition catalog, Centre Georges Pompidou,
Paris, 25 Feb.-21 June 1993), p. 415. The painting is today in the Mus&e Matisse in Le
Cateau-Cambresis.
??i...
:i....i
16. So for example Freedberg writes of the Capitoline St. John the Baptist with a Ram in
the paragraph following the one quoted in n. 14:
The way in which Caravaggio relates to this seen image-but not only to this par-
ticular kind of image, it should be understood-is as if to a love-object. He translates
into his act of art the lover's experience of seeing and touch, which he has galvanized
at that very instant where, in a living situation, seeing would be turned into touching.
Visual sensation is intensely charged, containing a high tension and generating more.
The artist is by nature a voyeur, and here Caravaggio has created a voyeuristic situa-
tion into which the spectator, as he takes the painter's place in front of the completed
canvas, necessarily must fall. The meaning of the picture thus depends not only on
the presence Caravaggio has evoked in it, but on the situation he has now made.
There is no very meaningful action or emotion that occurs within the painting; what
is meaningful comes instead from the relationship established initially between the
artist and the model and then, as we are the surrogate for the painter when we look
at the picture, between the model-image and ourselves. [1600, p. 54]
17. The discussion of Courbet that follows is based on my book Courbet's Realism (Chi-
cago, 1990), the middle work in a trilogy comprising also Absorption and Theatricality: Painting
and Beholder in the Age of Diderot (1980; Chicago, 1988) and Manet's Modernism, or, The Face of
Painting in the 1860s (Chicago, 1996).
canvas. This is a general feature of Courbet's art, and its significance with
respect to Caravaggio will become clear shortly.
It follows that Courbet and Caravaggio may be seen as pursuing very
nearly antithetical enterprises. Whereas in my account Courbet (or the
painter-beholder) strives to achieve a relationship of quasi-corporeal
merger with the painting on which he is working, Caravaggio in the sec-
ond, more conspicuously thematized "moment" in the production of his
works finds himself compelled if not actually to seek to remove himself
from the painting then at any rate to dramatize the very movement or
indeed shock of separation from it, thereby establishing the painting, not
exactly as theatrical (the Diderotian problematic of theatricality and anti-
theatricality doesn't yet apply), but in a new and highly polarized relation
to the general issue of spectatordom. (That is what it means to call the
second "moment" a specular one.)
In keeping with this difference of aim, we find in Courbet's and Cara-
vaggio's respective self-portraits antithetical relations to the use of a mir-
ror. For Courbet, the ideal would be to bypass the mirror entirely by
painting himself directly into the picture before him; as I observe in Cour-
bet's Realism, his most characteristic self-portraits give the impression that
a mirror might have been used to give him information about his features
but not at all to guide the movements of his brush across the canvas. One
marker of this is his evident desire to avoid mirror-reversal of right and
left in favor of relations of congruence of right and left between the painted
image and his own bodily orientation, the better to facilitate his virtual
merger with the painting. (I drew attention to such a relation of congru-
ence in the Stonebreakers; in the Man with the Leather Belt, the turning back
of the sitter's right hand into the picture-space allows it to be aligned with
the painter-beholder's right hand, as I have said; but Courbet was able to
devise no comparable solution for the sitter's left hand, which with re-
spect to the impulse toward merger-as an image of the painter-
beholder's left or palette-hand-is exactly where it shouldn't be. As
regards the treatment of right and left, Courbet's breakthrough to the
large, ostensibly more impersonal Realist canvases of the late 1840s
and 1850s enabled him to be truer to his actual bodily orientation than
had been possible within the conventions of the self-portrait.) In con-
trast, Caravaggio's self-portraits, once they are understood as such, seem
openly to acknowledge the presence of a mirror, both by the character of
the figures' gazes and by the painter's evident acceptance of, though not
in all cases insistence upon, mirror-reversal. In fact it's tempting to associ-
ate the mirror-image as such with what I have been calling specularity
and the painting with its opposite, but despite the terminological connec-
tion between mirrors and specularity (a "speculum" is a kind of mirror)is
wi:?
FIG. 3.-Gustave Courbet, The Desperate Man, 1843? Oil on canvas. Private collection.
Photo: Bulloz.
"5. ~; ? .i;
i~ii:: .... a : ,
?L :: :,. . ::. i .
''".. ,.o..
FIG. 4.-Gustave C
Petit Palais, Paris.
...... ....
FIG. 5.-Gustave Courbet, Man with the Leather Belt, 1845-46? Oil on canvas.
Mus6e d'Orsay, Paris. Photo: @ R.M.N.
the temptation must be resisted: first, because the use of the mirror obvi-
ously cannot be restricted to the second of the two "moments" I have
evoked; second, because there is no reason to think that the painter in
the first of those "moments" was not as immersed in the contemplation
of his mirror-image as he was in the act of rendering that image in the
painting; and, third, because in the end it was of course the painted image
the separation of which from both painter and beholder Caravaggio
found it necessary to dramatize and thereby to enforce. And yet a distinc-
tion between mirror and painting, or perhaps simply a sense of the real
or implied presence of a mirror-image "within" the painted one, seems
Aoo
:; . ... ?j .. .
..
..:
? .. ...
..... ..
.....,
?....~~~ ~:.!i:;
~ ~ ~ii!;:^:T.
~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~ ~?... :. .:?.,...
~ ' n..l,.' -,....?.... ..
?p ..,. .. ?-. ., . . ? ,
, .o ':i" ...: ,., :...,..- .
ber of figures are shown in close proximity to the picture surface, both
worked on a dark ground and made frequent use of effects of strong
chiaroscuro, and both were criticized in their own time for their apparent
failure to master the depiction of action. In any case, the questions raised
by the comparison between Caravaggio and Courbet include: What does
it mean that in the 1590s and early 1600s in Italy and again around
the middle of the nineteenth century in France realism and self-
representation were bound together in these ways? What is the broader
significance of the fact that whereas Courbet's project led him to avoid or
minimize effects of violence, Caravaggio's drove him on the contrary to
produce some of the most terrible painting in all European art? How are
we to understand the role of the body and of the imagination of the body
in their respective oeuvres? And what are the implications of all this for
our understanding of what might be called the history of subjectivity?'9
(Before going farther, let me make two parenthetical remarks of a
theoretical nature. First, what I have been calling two "moments" in the
production of Caravaggio's paintings are not quite to be thought of as
succeeding one another in time. We might say that his paintings invite us
to consider them in that light, and it may be that it is only with the aid
of a temporal metaphor that they can be conceptualized at all. But the
distinction I am after is structural rather than temporal and is best imag-
ined as potentially in play throughout the production and perhaps also
the contemplation of Caravaggio's paintings. In this respect the "mo-
ments" in question are not unlike those in certain psychoanalytic scenar-
ios, to which indeed they bear a certain relation.20 Second, my proposal
19. On the production of effects of violence in Courbet when his art misfires, see the
discussion of the Death of the Stag in Fried, Courbet's Realism, pp. 184-88. And for a sheerly
literary problematic involving two competing modes of seeing or visualization and yielding
effects of violence and shock analogous to those considered in this essay, see Fried, Realism,
Writing, Disfiguration: On Thomas Eakins and Stephen Crane (Chicago, 1987), chap. 2, "Stephen
Crane's Upturned Faces." The italicized adjective "terrible" is meant to resonate with the
epithet terribilita associated in his own lifetime with Michelangelo, one of Caravaggio's basic
points of reference. It's more than likely that pursuing these questions will entail looking
beyond painting, for example in the direction of Shakespeare and of Stanley Cavell's essays
on his tragedies (gathered in Disowning Knowledge in Six Plays of Shakespeare [Cambridge,
1987]), and Joel Fineman's book on the sonnets (Shakespeare's Perjured Eye: The Invention of
Poetic Subjectivity in the Sonnets [Berkeley, 1986]).
20. See for example Leo Bersani's remarks about a "masochistic" scenario he has de-
veloped out of elements in Freud's "Economic Problem of Masochism" and "Instincts and
Their Vicissitudes":
The chronology is false because of the intersubjective nature of the entire fantasy
process. In the wish to master the other, we immediately encounter a resistance
which redirects the desire for mastery onto the self. It seems likely that we experience
simultaneously the desire to control the other, the desire to control the self, the desire
to be controlled by the other, the masochistic pleasure in being mastered, and the
masochistic excitement of identifying with the other's suffering in our sadistic vio-
lence toward him. The different steps of a process must already be accomplished at
the moment the process "begins"; the various representations along a line of fantasy
are merely the spelling out of an intentionality sufficiently dense to inspire the articu-
lations of a fantasy-drama. [Leo Bersani, Baudelaire and Freud (Berkeley, 1977), p. 87
n. 17]
In the same vein but perhaps more to the point, because engaging with a problematic of
narcissism that might roughly be analogized with the "moment" of specularity ("that per-
sonage in the painting is not me, I [the painter, the first viewer] am me"), is the following:
In this connection, we must not let ourselves be misled by Freud's genetic presen-
tation of the concept of narcissism: narcissism does not precede the relation to the
other, and likewise the delusion of grandeur in narcissism is not a return to the
original solitude of a monad walled in upon itself. There is only one "stage" and it
is that of the primary opening (the narcissistic wound), which opens me to myself as
(the) other. So let us not dream, with Freud, of an ego whose existence would
precede sociality (or-and it is the same thing-a sociality that would relate already-
constituted subjects to each other). This would be to theorize with delusion, to specu-
late in line with desire. For narcissism is precisely that: the violent affirmation of the
ego, the violent desire to annul that primitive alteration that makes me desire (my-
self) as the mimetic double. Here we find a sort of instantaneous undertow that
makes desire forgetful of its own origin, as [Rene] Girard sees quite clearly: desire is
mimetic and by the same token narcissistic, and that means that it launches headlong
into a systematic, unreflective forgetfulness of what institutes it. [Mikkel Borch-
Jacobsen, The Freudian Subject, trans. Catherine Porter (Stanford, Calif., 1988), p. 93]
The next paragraph begins: "It follows that desire is love of oneself, as Freud writes [who
also terms that love "homosexual"]: self-love, love of the proper. It follows too that it is
organized as a vehement rejection of all resemblance, all mimesis. To recognize that I re-
semble the other, that I resemble myself in him even in my own desire, would be tanta-
mount to admitting the inadmissible: that I am not myself and that my most proper being
is over there, in that double who enrages me" (ibid.). My sense of the pertinence of Borch-
Jacobsen's work to my arguments in this essay owes almost everything to the work and
conversation of Ruth Leys. See for example Ruth Leys, "The Real Miss Beauchamp: Gender
and the Subject of Imitation," in Feminists Theorize the Political, ed. Judith Butler and Joan
Scott (New York, 1992), pp. 167-214.
21. See Gilbert, Caravaggio and His Two Cardinals, pp. 253-54. See also Christoph L.
Frommel, "Caravaggio und seine Modelle," Castrum Peregrini 96 (1971): 21-56.
We have not yet plumbed the depths of the mirror in the Boy with a
Lizard, however. Standing before the painting, our initial impression,
once we begin to see it in the terms I have sketched, is not only that the
painting portrays what the artist saw in the mirror but also that the paint-
ing has replaced the mirror, as if there were space on the wall before us
for one or the other but not both. But if we look more closely-if we
interrogate the painted image for clues as to the circumstances under
which it was made-which is to say if we take the image as a reliable
guide to those circumstances, which of course it may not be (but what
matters is that the painting, seen in these terms, invites us to take the
image as such)-we soon realize that the canvas and the mirror were
never competitors for the same space. According to the dispositif I have
been describing, we are asked to visualize the canvas and the mirror as
having "originally" been at right angles to one another, with the painter
positioned obliquely between them so as to be able to study his reversed
image in the mirror and then to transpose it to the painting gradually
being realized under his brush. Only after the painting was completed
was it hung where the mirror had been; only then did it displace, not
replace, the mirror, "with all that [this] implies by way of instability in
any identity thereby produced," as Jacqueline Rose has remarked in a
different context.22 In other words, the logic of this particular mode of
mirror-representation, which for obvious reasons I shall call right-angle
mirror-representation, is such that the painting appears to insist on its
virtual identity with the absent mirror while at the same time represent-
ing itself-itself "originally," in the process of being painted-as noniden-
tical with the picture surface, indeed as rotated ninety degrees into the
picture space in the immediate vicinity of the right-hand or left-hand
framing edge. It may also be the case, as in the Boy Bitten by a Lizard, that
the painting represents itself not only as rotated ninety degrees into the
picture space but also as placed just beyond the right-hand framing edge,
that is, as just barely excluded from the representational field, which how-
ever must be thought of as oriented to that excluded element as to noth-
ing else.
It's in this context that I interpret the placement and treatment of
the glass vase filled with water and containing a single rose, along with
some small white flowers, in the right foreground. More precisely, the
dazzlingly painted vase bears toward its right a complex structure of re-
flections (for want of a better word; refractions would be more accurate
but would sound stilted) that at first glance may seem to be at odds with
the rest of the composition. Whereas the dominant flow of light in the
22. Jacqueline Rose, The Haunting of Sylvia Plath (Cambridge, Mass., 1991), p. 228:
"The trope of identification," Rose writes in a psychoanalytic vein of Plath's likening herself
to a Jew in "Daddy," "is not substitution but displacement, with all that it implies by way of
instability in any identity thereby produced."
painting as a whole is from the upper left toward the lower right (the
vase casts a shadow in that direction), the reflections appear to imply the
existence of a window or skylight not to the left, where logically it should
be, but to the right, where no light is coming from. But in fact the reflec-
tions are perfectly consistent with the presence of a light-source at the
upper left (this can be verified by simple experiment), which is to say that
they are a brilliant and masterly expression of the painter's commitment
to a new, optically acute mode of realism that was perhaps to receive its
fullest development in Dutch still life painting of the seventeenth cen-
tury.23 But despite their accuracy, or by virtue of the way in which the Boy
Bitten by a Lizard makes a point of that accuracy, the reflections also inevi-
tably direct the viewer's attention toward the right, beyond the framing
edge, where the excluded representation of the canvas is implicitly to be
found. (See too the shadowy, jagged-ended strip of drapery that fairly
flies off the boy's left shoulder in the direction of the right-hand framing
edge.) And this suggests that the reflections are perhaps to be read not
simply as an index of a new realism but also as acknowledging, even com-
pensating for, the act of exclusion. In any case, the split nature of those
reflections-the impression they convey of two distinct sources of light-
amounts to a further thematization, within the topos of mirroring, of the
double or divided structure of Caravaggio's enterprise.
By the same token, the marvelously delicate rose surrounded by
dark green leaves that obscures the neck of the vase even as it seems to
draw the light to its own internal articulations may perhaps be seen as
figuring, if not the first, immersive "moment" as such, at any rate a non-
specular relation to the rose as a motif-as if we are invited to imagine
an act of painting that could only render that motif by "blindly" submit-
ting to it, or say by losing itself in its folds. Note too in this connection
the obvious analogy between the other rose behind the boy's ear and,
precisely, the boy's ear. (A thematics of music, prominent in other early
Caravaggios, is not far off.) An unexpected but highly significant fact that
has emerged from the study of X-rays of Caravaggio's canvases is that
he habitually began painting heads by depicting ears, not eyes-as if to
24. In the words of Cesare Brandi, quoted in translation by Hibbard: "'He did not
draw, because the X-rays have shown that there is no compositional preparation under-
neath, but rather new beginnings, simultaneous and overlapping, with heads that almost
always begin with an ear and that are then abandoned and covered up"' (C, p. 29 n. 9). The
reference is to Brandi, "L"Episteme' caravaggesca," Colloquio 5 (1974): 9-17, 10.
25. This is a large claim tendentiously based on nothing more than my experience of
his paintings. But see Hals's earliest known painting, the panel Portrait of Jacobus Zaffius
(1611) in Haarlem, illustrated and discussed in Frans Hals (exhibition catalog, National Gal-
lery of Art, Washington, D.C., 1 Oct.-31 Dec. 1989; Royal Academy of Arts, London, 13
Jan.-8 Apr. 1990; Frans Halsmuseum, Haarlem, 11 May-22 July 1990), pp. 130-32.
26. Of the Borghese picture I will simply say that the absence of an extended or up-
raised left arm and hand in no way tells against the kind of reading I advanced with regard
to the Boy Bitten by a Lizard; on the contrary, partly on the strength of my reading of the
latter, I am led to see in the conspicuous absence of such an arm and hand (it's with some-
thing of a shock that one finally notices that the young man's left hand as well as his right
is clutching the bunch of grapes) another kind of disguise for or distortion of the portrayal
of the extended "moment" of immersion in the act of painting. As for the Musicians, the
young man holding a cornet and looking out of the painting has been persuasively identi-
fied as the youthful Caravaggio (see Gregori, Age of Caravaggio, p. 228), but what I want to
draw attention to is that the young man's bodily position and the cornet itself invite us to
see him and it as still another representation of the painter in the act of right-angle mirror-
representation. Later in this essay I shall also suggest that the young man depicted from
the rear in the right foreground bears a relation of congruence to the embodied painter,
which is to say that in the Musicians, as in other works by Caravaggio, the painter is (at least)
doubly "present," as mirror-image and as corporealized surrogate or double, without there
being the least tension between the two (a point the full significance of which I must leave unde-
veloped for the time being).
One other early work might be mentioned in this connection: the wonderful Basket of
Fruit in the Ambrosiana (ca. 1598-1601). In that painting the twig with leaves extending
out of the canvas toward the right (a very odd feature that to my knowledge has never
received the attention it deserves) may be read as alluding to the dispositif of right-angle
mirror reflection (the twig standing in for the painter's mirror-reversed right arm), which
suggests that the Basket of Fruit may indeed have been painted not directly from the motif
but from its reflection according to the dispositif of right-angle mirror-representation (to
that extent supporting the claims by Longhi cited in note 11 above). On the Ambrosiana
picture, see the perceptive essay by Michel Butor, "La Corbeille de l'Ambrosienne," in Riper-
toire III (Paris, 1968), pp. 43-58, which stresses both a certain internal division within the
painting (based on light and shade) and the way in which the basket of fruit itself becomes
an "offering" to the viewer in an all but religious sense (a sense that comes to the fore in
the treatment of the similar basket of fruit in the London Supper at Emmaus).
27. For general information on the Brera canvas, see Posner, Annibale Carracci: A Study
in the Reform of Italian Painting around 1590, 2 vols. (London, 1971), 1:21, 2:13. See also
Bologna 1584: Gli esordi dei Carracci e gli affreschi di Palazzo Fava (exhibition catalog, Pinacoteca
Nazionale di Bologna, 13 Oct.-16 Dec. 1984), pp. 180-81.
28. See Manet's Modernism, chap. 5, "Between Realisms," for a discussion of mirror-
reversed self-portraits and related works by all three artists; the secondary literature on
earlier developments is summarized on pp. 601-2 n. 9. The extreme rarity of mirror-
reversed self-portraits before 1860 was first noted by Zirka Zaremba Filipczak, Picturing Art
in Antwerp, 1550-1700 (Princeton, 1987), p. 202. Shortly after writing the lecture that be-
came the basis for "Between Realisms" I saw the Boy Bitten by a Lizard in London and realized
that it could be understood as a mirror-reversed image of the painter in the act of painting
a self-portrait. My thinking about Caravaggio began in earnest at that moment.
I might add that "Between Realisms" argues that the embrace of mirror-reversal by
the artists of the generation of 1863 expresses a new, quasi-programmatic fidelity to ocular
perception, which in their work is both conjoined and contrasted with a Courbet-like com-
mitment to a bodily mode of realism; this, however, is not quite the same as saying that I
see a tension between ocular evidence and bodily experience in the treatment of the
depicted painter's mirror-reversed hands in Annibale's Self-Portrait or indeed in Matisse's
Self-Portrait. In Caravaggio's work, as was suggested in note 26, we find an entirely comple-
mentary relation between ocular and bodily modes of experience (to the extent that the
latter distinction captures the difference between the reversed and facing mirror-image and
the positionally congruent double or surrogate). I touch again on this aspect of Caravaggio's
art toward the end of this essay. Compare Freedberg's remarks on the fusion of optical
experience and what he calls "the sense in the mind of tactile experience" (1600, p. 54),
quoted in note 14 above.
29. In general I am persuaded by Charles Dempsey's view that the young Caravaggio
was familiar with the early phase of the Carracci's pictorial reforms. See for example Demp-
sey's catalog entry on Annibale's The Butcher Shop in Christ Church, Oxford, in the Age of
Caravaggio, in which he expressed his agreement with Longhi's proposal that Caravaggio
saw the Carracci's works in Northern Italy (AC, p. 111). In subsequent essays Dempsey
emphasizes Caravaggio's stunned but also immediately assimilative response to Annibale's
St. Margaret in Santa Caterina dei Funari when it was set up in 1599; see Charles Dempsey,
"The Carracci Reform of Painting," in The Age of Correggio and the Carracci: Emilian Painting
of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries (exhibition catalog, Pinacoteca Nazionale, Bologna,
10 Sept. 10-Nov. 10, 1986; National Gallery of Art, Washington, D.C., 19 Dec. 1986-16
Feb. 1987; Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York, 26 Mar.-24 May 1987), pp. 237-54,
esp. p. 253; and "Idealism and Realism in Rome around 1600," in II Classicismo: Medioevo,
Rinascimento, Barocco, ed. Atti del Colloquio Cesare Gnudi (Bologna, 1993), pp. 233-43, esp.
pp. 236-38.
5?'
:i
s:
bh;i.9.. .;~c~
A. .. ? .
Ago
. ... ....
f::WJ
OPP
FIG. 9.-Annibale Carracci, Self-Portrait with Figures, ca. 1585. Oil on canvas. Pinaco-
theca di Brera, Milan. Photo: Scala/Art Resource, New York.
30. Roberto Zapperi in his stimulating book on the young Annibale interprets the Self-
Portrait with Figures as based on the double schemata of the ages of man and the family
portrait in Annibale Carracci: Portrait de l'artiste en jeune homme, trans. Marie-Ange Maire Vi-
except one hand of the man at the right. The force of that elision is such
as to give his downcast, absorbed, only partly readable expression and his
almost formal gesture of donation immense pictorial authority, with the
result that his largely occluded "presence" fully rivals if it does not exceed
that of Annibale himself. And because what does the eliding is the edge
of the canvas on which Annibale is shown working (in close proximity
to the edge of the actual canvas), I suggest that the act of elision may
be viewed as linked with and expressive of the powers of painting as dis-
tinct from the automatic and in a sense all-inclusive process of mirror-
reflection-a process with which, in a brilliant, nominally self-effacing
conceit, Annibale on this interpretation associated his portrayal of his
own image. I suggest, in other words, that Annibale's Self-Portrait with Fig-
ures, like Caravaggio's Boy Bitten by a Lizard, implies a distinction between
mirroring and painting. But whereas in Caravaggio's picture the terms of
that distinction remain unfixable and in a sense infinite, Annibale's Self-
Portrait with Figures privileges painting, whose faculty of selective exclu-
sion-also whose thematization of the mental and bodily state I have
called absorption-enables it to engage the mind and the emotions in a
way no merely mechanical process could ever hope to do.3' It's in this
light that I see the famous pictorial riddles (divinarelli pittorici) Malvasia
reports the Carracci delighted in (fig. 10): from left to right, the four
examples he gives represent a stonemason with trowel behind a wall, a
Capuchin preacher taking a nap in the pulpit, a knight in the lists, and a
blind man coming around a corner (the last two are structurally the same
but turned in different directions).32 All depend for their effect on a sche-
gueur (1989; Aix-en-Provence, 1990). Zapperi's argument seems to me attractive but finally
inconclusive. T. J. Clark, toward the end of an essay on Jacques-Louis David's Self-Portrait
of 1794, discusses both Annibale's canvas and Zapperi's reading of it, which he too finds
problematic; see T. J. Clark, "Gross David with the Swoln Cheek: An Essay on Self-
Portraiture," in Rediscovering History: Culture, Politics, and the Psyche, ed. Michael S. Roth
(Stanford, Calif., 1994), pp. 243-307, esp. pp. 303-6.
31. Annibale's continuing stake in the interplay of painting and mirroring functions is
suggested by a preliminary drawing at Windsor Castle for the late Self-Portrait in the Her-
mitage (a work that depicts a self-portrait on an easel). "At the top of the Windsor drawing,"
Posner writes,
is a study for a portrait of the artist, behind whom is what appears to be an oval
mirror in which seemingly the same sitter appears again, in the same direction, how-
ever, as in the foreground portrait. In the next stage, sketched in below in the Wind-
sor drawing, the portrait is seen on a canvas resting on an easel. Behind is a window
or mirror in which another figure is seen .... The final painting represents a simpli-
fication of the design, and it was painted hurriedly and rather carelessly. [Posner,
Annibale Carracci, 2:65-66]
On the Hermitage canvas, which gives the impression of not being mirror-reversed, see the
brief but passionate remarks by Dempsey, Annibale Carracci and the Beginnings of Baroque Style
(Glhickstadt, 1977), p. 73.
32. See Carlo Cesare Malvasia's life of the Carracci in Felsina Pittrice: Vite dei pittori
bolognesi, ed. Marcella Brascaglia (1678; Bologna, 1971), p. 288.
r~A[j
FIG. 10.-Pic
trice: Vite dei
matic for
a straigh
painting
always be
ration of
be shown.s4
33. Annibale's concern with elision, evident in the use of extreme foreshortening in
early pictures like the Dead Christ in Stuttgart as well as throughout the Farnese Gallery,
is also registered in a drawing at Windsor Castle that parodies or caricatures Tintoretto's
Annunciation in the Scuola di San Rocco. In Tintoretto's picture the annunciating angel,
shown in flight as he enters the room in which the Virgin sits, has his lower legs cut off by
a wall that we view almost end-on (the wall nearest us is mysteriously absent); in his drawing
Annibale mischievously restores the latter wall, with the result that most of the angel is now
obscured from view. "By a witty, relatively small, and not so illogical change in the image,"
Posner writes, "the marvellously expressive spatial configuration in Tintoretto's painting is
transformed into an architectural and presentational absurdity. The drawing thus unmasks
what Annibale considered the underlying indecorousness, that is, the visual and contentual
inappropriateness, of the painting" (Posner, Annibale Carracci, 1:84). An alternative reading
to Posner's is that Annibale saw in Tintoretto's elision only of the annunciating angel's lower
legs a minimalist and therefore trivial use of his own master trope. In the Windsor drawing
in contrast only the angel's lower legs and feet and pointing finger are not elided by the
walls of the Virgin's house; it thereby reverses the terms of Tintoretto's composition to comic
effect but precisely by doing so calls attention to the suggestive powers of elision that Tintor-
etto failed to mobilize. See also Gilbert's brief discussion of Annibale's drawing, which he
places in 1597, in Caravaggio and His Two Cardinals, pp. 86-87.
34. Another major work by an Italian artist, in this case subsequent to Caravaggio,
makes a fascinating if ultimately unparsable term of comparison with the works I have been
discussing: Artemisia Gentileschi's Self-Portrait as the Allegory of Painting of around 1630. The
latter has been studied by Mary D. Garrard, who acutely observes that "no man could have
painted this particular image because by tradition the art of painting was symbolized by an
allegorical female figure, and thus only a woman could identify herself with the personifi-
cation" ("Artemisia Gentileschi's Self-Portrait as the Allegory of Painting," Art Bulletin 62 [Mar.
1980]: 97). See also Garrard, Artemisia Gentileschi: The Image of the Female Hero in Italian Ba-
roque Art (Princeton, N.J., 1983), chap. 6, "The Allegory of Painting." Garrard also empha-
sizes the way in which the depicted painter's unruly locks of hair suggest her "guileless
indifference to personal appearance while caught up in the heat of work, a state of mind
that contrasts sharply with that of contemporary male artists whose self-portraits indicate
their efforts to look like gentlemen" ("Artemisia Gentileschi's Self-Portrait," pp. 106-7). An
important difference between Artemisia's self-portrait and both Annibale's Brera picture
and, in my account, Caravaggio's Boy Bitten by a Lizard is that hers is not mirror-reversed.
Garrard, who doesn't discuss the larger issue of mirror-representation, speculates that in
order to portray herself in near profile Artemisia must have used two mirrors arranged at
an angle of slightly less than 90 degrees relative to one another; she would have been able
to see her own left profile by looking into the mirror on the right (see ibid., p. 109 n. 31).
But of course there is no need to assume that Artemisia did this, or that her painting is
based on her reflection in a mirror in any but the most general way. Indeed, how the paint-
ing was actually made is much less important than how the viewer is invited to understand
the operations it depicts, and this, it seems to me, is unresolvably ambiguous. For example,
are we meant to see the foreshortening of the painter's head and upper body, which allows
us only the most restricted sense of her gaze, together with her seeming concentration on
the task at hand as implying the absence of a mirror, as if all her attention were focused on
the canvas on which she is working? Or are we meant to gather from the strong sideways
lean of her head and upper body that she is looking past that canvas toward a mirror that,
like the canvas, lies outside the representational field? Garrard in her book on Artemisia
writes confidently that "the artist looks into the light, bending around the canvas to see her
model, which is her own reflection in a mirror" (Garrard, Artemisia Gentileschi, p. 361), but
this is just conjecture. Indeed, it's impossible to be sure about the location and orientation
of the canvas on which the painter is shown painting. Are we to imagine it placed at a right
angle to the actual picture surface in the vicinity of the left-hand picture edge? Or are we
somehow to identify it with the entire brown left three-quarters of the background, in which
case, as Garrard says in her article, "it is curious that ... the depicted canvas should com-
pletely lack physical substance or firm definition" ("Artemisia Gentileschi's Self-Portrait," p.
109 n. 31). Then too there is the way in which the painter has been shown applying paint
high up on the canvas before her (whatever we take the latter's limits and orientation to be),
which if identified with the canvas we are looking at would seem to suggest that she is not
portraying herself at the moment of depiction, unless of course she is painting the hand and
brush themselves, in which case using a mirror would be unnecessary. Our uncertainty on
these points is frustrating in that it prevents us from specifying what sort of relation between
painting and mirroring Artemisia's Self-Portrait as Allegory of Painting was designed to project.
In any case, there is something almost Courbet-like in the artfully negotiated avoidance of
the depicted painter's gaze as well as in the powerful evocation of her physical nearness and
sheer bodily being.
It scarcely needs stressing that the issue of the relation between painting and mirror-
ing in these and other late sixteenth- and early seventeenth-century self-portraits bears
directly on Diego Velisquez's strategy in the most famous of all representations of the artist
at work, Las Meninas (1656); roughly, we may say that by juxtaposing the mirror on the back
wall (in which we see reflected images, the originals of which may be "real" or painted, of
the king and queen) with the portrayal of himself in the act of painting with a brush in his
right hand and a palette in his left (that is, not mirror-reversed), Velasquez distinguished
sharply between mirroring and painting even as he wove the two together in a complex
intellectual and poetic structure the precise meaning of which remains a matter of conjec-
ture and dispute, as readers of this journal are well aware; see, for example, Joel Snyder,
"Las Meninas and the Mirror of the Prince," Critical Inquiry 11 (June 1985): 539-72. Indeed
the extent to which Velasquez's masterpiece, for all its originality, is not unique in its con-
cern with these matters emerges if we consider Charles Lebrun's ambitious Evrard Jabach
and His Family (ca. 1657-59), formerly in the Kaiser Friedrich Museum in Berlin and today
For what it is worth, my feeling is that we may be on the verge of learning considerably
more than has previously been known about the use of mirrors by artists of the sixteenth
Uffizi Bacchus, also of around 1596-97 (fig. 11).35 Judging by the protago-
nist's facial features, the Bacchus is not literally a self-portrait, though it
has sometimes been taken for one.36 But it has always been viewed as
close in spirit to the Boy Bitten by a Lizard, and if we think of it in the
context of the general question of mirror-representation, imagining the
mirror this time to have been not at right angles to the canvas but in
effect as coinciding with it (though in fact the "original" location of the
mirror or even whether a mirror was actually used is unknowable; my
point is that unlike the Boy Bitten by a Lizard, the Bacchus does not imply a
right-angled relation of mirror to canvas but rather suggests an impos-
sible conflation of the two), we realize that Bacchus's gesture of extending
his left arm and hand holding a goblet of wine toward the beholder may
be seen as a disguised mirror-image of the painter's right arm and hand
extending directly toward the picture surface and wielding the brush
with which the picture was painted. Moreover, if we look more closely at
the arm, hand, and wineglass (fig. 12), we are struck by what seems to be
(what seems to be; I shall come back to this) a pattern of concentric ripples
on the surface of the wine, a striking detail that brilliantly evokes the
movement of Bacchus's arm and hand toward the viewer. Gregori indeed
has described the ripples as "enhancing the effect of instantaneousness"
(AC, p. 244), and one sees what she means. But I am impressed by some-
thing else as well: the strong analogy between the seeming ripples in the
wine and the concentric folds in the drapery covering Bacchus's left arm,
an analogy I take as suggesting a certain continuity between the two, as
if the ripples are to be seen-are also to be seen-as prolonging the ges-
ture of the arm (indefinitely, as it were) rather than as simply or uni-
vocally signifying the freezing of that gesture in an effect of pure
instantaneousness. To be more exact, and recalling the distinctly nonin-
stantaneous tenor of the depicted Matisse's action in his Self-Portrait of
1918, I see the analogy between the ripples and the folds as evoking the
protracted or repetitive action of applying paint to canvas, which is to say
that I read Bacchus's gesture-not his figure as a whole, but the action
and seventeenth centuries. See in this connection the interesting article by Carlo del Bravo,
"Dal Pontormo al Bronzino," Artibus et historiae, no. 12 (1985): 75-87, which Elizabeth Crop-
per brought to my attention. Her own current work on mirroring and mirror-imagery in
Bronzino, Poussin, and other sixteenth- and seventeenth-century artists will make an im-
portant contribution to the topic.
35. The Bacchus was found and attributed to Caravaggio by Longhi, but was only
universally recognized as autograph after the 1922 exhibition of sixteenth- and seven-
teenth-century Italian painting at the Palazzo Pitti in Florence; see Matteo Marangoni,
"Note sul Caravaggio alla mostra del Sei e Settecento," Bolletino d'arte, no. 5 (Nov. 1922):
224. Since then the Bacchus has been considered a principal work of Caravaggio's early
period in Rome; see, for example, Cinotti, Caravaggio, pp. 431-33; AC, pp. 241-46; and C,
pp. 39-43.
36. For example, both Friedlaender and Wittkower regarded the Bacchus, Boy Bitten by
a Lizard, and Medusa as self-portraits; see n. 9 above.
of his left arm and hand-as evoking what I have been calling the "mo-
ment" of immersion or continuity (of prolongation, one might also say).37
All this may seem to go quite far, but there is a further consideration
whose import is incalculable. I have been insisting that the ripples on the
surface of the wine in the goblet only seem to be there; in fact what we are
seeing-through the wine, not on its surface-are concentric or rather
parallel spirals in the glass bowl of the goblet itself.38 In one sense this
relates the goblet all the more closely to the concentric folds in Bacchus's
drapery. And of course the fact remains that the dominant impression
conveyed is of ripples on the surface of the wine, as Gregori's remarks
attest. But the tension between that impression and the actual relations
between the goblet and the wine introduces a level of complexity that
goes beyond what I have said so far. At the very least, the tension seems
to suggest a split or division within the painted image analogous to that
between immersive and specular "moments," the latter associated with
the "frozen" spirals in the bowl of the goblet, though the fact that Greg-
ori and others have read the apparent ripples as signifying instanta-
neousness-whereas I read them as also signifying "prolongation"--goes
to show that the division in question cuts deeper than the ripples/spirals
ambiguity.
Two additional features of the Bacchus are pertinent to this discus-
sion. First, Bacchus himself seems clearly to wear makeup. Needless to
say, this has often been given a sexual interpretation, but what I want to
"Even a child's first impulse involves this practical alteration of external things [as a
means of representing himself, Hegel implies]; a boy throws stones into the river and now
marvels at the circles drawn in the water as an effect in which he gains an intuition of something
that is his own doing. This need runs through the most diversiform phenomena up to
that mode of self-production in external things which is present in the work of art."
[Fried, Courbet's Realism, p. 276; emphasis added]
Not a Narcissistic mirroring of the self in the undisturbed surface of a pond but a represen-
tation of the self in action (in the action of self-representation) by the disruption of a poten-
tially reflective surface: is it legitimate to read a prefiguring of the Hegelian scenario in
Caravaggio's depiction of Bacchus's arm, hand, and goblet of wine? Even if it is, of course,
that act of reading takes place against the grain of the representational tenor of the painting
as a whole, which as a large secondary literature testifies could hardly be more specular or
discontinuous in its overall effect. (The implications of the above for an assessment of the
famous Narcissus in the Palazzo Corsini in Rome, a picture that may or may not be by Cara-
vaggio, remain to be worked out.)
38. I owe this observation to Charles Dempsey.
.. . .... :::.:
:ii.li : :?
::::"" .i
t6 5i l?!: ?;?;;
FIG. 11.-Caravaggio, Bacchus, ca. 1596-97. Oil on canvas. Galleria degli Uffizi, Flor-
ence. Photo: Alinari/Art Resource, New York.
39. See Jean-Claude Lebensztejn, "Au beauty parlour," Traverses, no. 7 (1977): 74-94:
"A travers l'histoire de l'imitation," Lebensztejn writes toward the beginning of his article,
"il se repute que la peinture est une cosmitique, mais que la cosmetique est le c6td honteux
de la peinture, sa materialite mauvaise dans l'ordre de la representation" (p. 77).
? 7 < ..:<l.?,
Ii"I
?.:? .JL ?::
ii f ">::
: ..
i~ . .,:
...... .. .. ?' ?i: :8: ',
',~ ~ ~~ ..:iT!i,!:,. 7r? ..,,u-!,.'! i
......:..-.C:
........................
? . .............
FIG. 12.-Detail
gesture with
his left hand
discover trac
perception of that detail, which takes place only at close range, produces
a tiny effect of shock that reproduces in miniature the distancing effect
of the picture as a whole.
The second feature of the Bacchus that must be mentioned is one for
which no adequate illustration exists: when the painting was cleaned in
the early 1920s a small head was discovered reflected in the convex sur-
face of the carafe at the lower left. According to Gregori, "the reflected
head is that of a male, who wears a contemporary costume with a white
collar; there also seems to be a painting seen from the back, as though
on an easel" (AC, p. 244).41 Not surprisingly, the figure of the man has
been thought to be a self-portrait, but regardless of his actual identity
(assuming for the moment that he was meant to represent a specific per-
son, which isn't certain), the reflection may be taken as acknowledging
not just the self-portrait character of the representation as a whole but
also that what ultimately is portrayed in the Bacchus is the production of
the Bacchus, with everything that that implies.42 Here again it is tempting
41. On an early morning visit to the Uffizi in April 1994, Elizabeth Cropper, Charles
Dempsey, Ruth Leys, and I were able to look at the Bacchus under a strong light, and sure
enough the head was there; the "canvas" was less certain, though there did seem to be a
diagonal mark that might have been the vestige of one. My thanks to Caterina Caneva,
deputy director of the Uffizi, for making our visit possible.
42. The crucial early discussion of the "reflected" figure is by Marangoni in 1922; see
n. 35 above. Marangoni's commentary, quoted first by Lebensztejn in "Au beauty parlour"
(p. 76) and then, from Lebensztejn, by Marin in To Destroy Painting (pp. 134-35), reads:
In the center of the mirror created by the wine in the flask, a recent cleaning has
revealed, as if reflected, the minuscule head of a young man that really does bring
to mind the young Caravaggio's physiognomic traits: large sockets, a broad-based
nose, slightly snubbed, full lips and a half-open mouth. Here we have yet another
reason, if another is needed, for including this work among the first to be painted
by Caravaggio. My friend Carlo Gamba helped me to see the similarity between this
little portrait and the figure that I, in my article in Dedalo, had taken for The Fruit
Vendor cited by Lanzi . . ., a figure that, according to Gamba, could be that of a young
man, and thus a kind of free self-portrait of Caravaggio as a young man.
The likelihood of this assumption could be confirmed by Baglione's testi-
mony, for he claims that after Caravaggio left [the Cavaliere d'Arpino's] "he tried to
support himself by producing some small paintings of himself in the mirror, of which
the first was a Bacchus with clusters of grapes of different kinds, made with great
care, but in a somewhat dry manner." This Bacchus, as Longhi was the first to suggest,
must be the one in the Uffizi, which would thus suddenly become not only an origi-
nal but also a free self-portrait, given its close connection with the Little Fruit Vendor
in the Borghese Gallery. Incidentally, Fiocco made me realize that Bacchus is the rep-
resentation of a figure reflected in a mirror, for he holds the cup with his left hand.
One must conclude, then, that the androgynous type, involving a combina-
tion of individual and ideal traits, that may be found in early works such as Petro-
grad's Bacchus [presumably the Luteplayer in the Hermitage], The Fruit Vendor, The Lute
Player, and in the young man in the Louvre's Gypsy ..., and even, I believe, in the
Uffizi's Medusa, is a product of Caravaggio having used himself as his own model.
What Marangoni doesn't quite say (nor does Lebensztejn or Marin) is that the figure of
Bacchus holding the cup with his left hand represents the painter painting the Bacchus with
his right hand. This does seem to be the implication of Czobor's remark that "in testa [of
the figure of Bacchus] si mette una corona di fronde e di grappoli d'uva e,-per rendere
perfetto il giuoco-depone sul desco levigato, accanto al piatto della fruta, un fiasco di vin
rosso, anzi, nella mano sinistra-poiche con la destra deve dipingere-tiene una coppa
colma di vino rosso" (Czobor, "Autoritratti del giovane Caravaggio," pp. 206-7; this is said
in the course of a discussion of the Bacchus as a self-portrait made with the help of a mirror).
But nothing is made of this by Czobor or anyone else.
43. A further aspect of the contrast between goblet and flask concerns the slight but
palpable temporal separation between the ripples/spirals in the goblet (whether they are
read as markers of instantaneousness or of prolongation) and the tilted surface of the wine
in the flask as well as the tiny bubbles that ring that surface, which together suggest that
the flask has just been put down, that is, that Bacchus a moment ago poured wine from the
flask into the goblet and then placed the flask on the low white tabletop separating him
from the viewer before proffering the goblet to the latter (as Gregori, following Marini,
remarks [AC, p. 241]). What makes the separation of those moments all the more sugges-
tive-what makes it allegorical of the division between immersive and specular "moments"
I have been analyzing-is the tension verging on contradiction between the implied previ-
ous action of Bacchus's right hand (pouring the wine) and its present position and action
(lightly fingering the bow of his sash).
44. For the general history and historiography of the painting, see Cinotti, Caravaggio,
pp. 502-5, and AC, pp. 338-40.
.. ...?..
....
...
.?'
...
i!:\:
o~ ". .=
.. . .= . ., li
.:=...=..? . .. ...:.
45. Compare Frank Stella's powerful suggestion that "the glance of David can be seen
as a different, distinct, continuing extension of time at odds with the fading temporal mea-
surement expressed in the disjoined vision of Goliath, where one eye is fixed while the other
forces a last blurred look at what it had experienced as reality" (Frank Stella, Working Space
[Cambridge, Mass., 1986], pp. 104, 109).
46. This in turn helps explain Caravaggio's predilection for gleaming armor in scenes
where it would seem far from inevitable-for example, the Taking of Christ, the Crucifixion of
St. Andrew, the Denial of St. Peter, and The Martyrdom of St. Ursula.
47. The title of that chapter will be "The Discovery of Absorption," and its argument
will be not that Caravaggio was the first painter to make use of absorptive themes and motifs
(those go back to antiquity) but that around 1600 he made the simple but momentous
discovery that a new, more emphatic mode of absorption, in combination with a new, more
emphatic kind of chiaroscuro (which indeed was required if the former was to be achieved),
could accomplish the tasks previously assigned to composition (compare the Incredulity of
Thomas) and to expression via depiction of the affetti (compare the Death of the Virgin). It's at
that moment also that Caravaggio emerged as the revolutionary realist painter (the painter
of what Bellori and others called the vero) whom Poussin later said had come into the world
to destroy painting, and my further suggestion will be that all the phenomena I have been
discussing or have just mentioned-the distinction between mirroring and painting, the in-
terplay of "moments" of immersion and specularity, the new, more emphatic modes of absorp-
tion and chiaroscuro, and the pursuit of the vero (also the activation of a new, "projective"
subjectivity on the part of the viewer, the dynamics of which will be a central focus of "The
Discovery of Absorption")--are elements in a single representational enterprise the full
import of which has yet to be grasped. On Caravaggio as painter of the vero, see Dempsey,
"Masters of Rhetoric," review of 1600, in New Criterion 1 (June 1983): 87-90 and "Idealism
and Realism in Rome around 1600," p. 238; and Cropper and Dempsey, "The State of Re-
search in Italian Painting of the Seventeenth Century," Art Bulletin 69 (Dec. 1987): 494-509.
48. On the Medusa, see Cinotti, Caravaggio, pp. 427-29; and C, pp. 67-69. On the
Salome Receiving the Head of John the Baptist, see AC, pp. 335-37; Cinotti, Caravaggio, pp.
453-54; and C, pp. 249-51.
49. For example, Marin explains Medusa's somewhat downward gaze by supposing
that at the moment she saw herself in Perseus's mirror-shield the latter
was positioned lower and to the left in relation to the surface of the representational
space. As a result, the viewer who occupies an external position is not in fact located
As for the London Salome from the last phase of Caravaggio's career,
I see it as glossing the David with the Head of Goliath by the addition of two
other figures who seem almost to share, hence to divide, a single body
(not a unique occurrence in his art): Salome, who even as she holds a
salver to receive the Baptist's head looks away, as if deferring the inevita-
ble "moment" of specularity; and an old woman, presumably her servant,
who gazes down over Salome's shoulder at the head in fascination and
distress, as if still caught up in the "moment" of immersion (of immersive
seeing), though it is also possible to view her as enacting the specular
"moment" before our eyes (albeit in an absorptive register; specularity in
Caravaggio is not invariably a matter of shock and recoil, which is another
reason for distinguishing terminologically between absorption and im-
mersion). Note too the "relaying" or "reflecting" relationship between the
old woman's downward absorbed gaze and the expression of the severed
head, a relationship similar to that between the absorbed "gazes" in the
David with the Head of Goliath or indeed among the personages in The Mar-
tyrdom of St. Ursula (a picture shortly to be discussed). In all these works,
as elsewhere in Caravaggio's oeuvre, reflection or mirroring has been
made part of both action and composition. For his part, the executioner
has been depicted gazing directly out of the painting while holding the
Baptist's head in his right, not left hand; as mentioned above, his gesture
is not a mirror-image of the act of painting, even as it reflects that act in
a general way. At the same time, I see his left hand resting on the hilt of
his sword in the painting's lower right-hand corner as indicating (imper-
fectly but compellingly) what in connection with Courbet I called a rela-
tion of congruence with the painter's actual right hand and brush, and
more broadly with the painter's actual bodily orientation before the can-
vas. The result is not a conflict or even a sense of disjunction between the
world of the painting and the world "this" side of the picture surface but
rather a complex network of accords and complementarities between the
two, as well as between the mirroring and painting functions. I will only
in the position of the real Gorgon. Instead, the viewer is where Perseus was (a mo-
ment before), just after he cut off her head, when his sword was no longer reflected
in the shield. [DP, p. 137]
(Note, by the way, the theme of being killed twice over, as in the David with the Head of
Goliath.) In other words, the moment of mirroring isn't represented from the point of view
of the mirror, which is to say that the Medusa drives a wedge not only between the two
moments of petrifaction and display (the moment of decapitation not being represented as
such), but between the shield/mirror as mirror (Perseus's secret weapon) and the shield/mir-
ror as painting (the artifact painted by Caravaggio and presented by the Cardinal del Monte
to the Grand Duke of Tuscany), a distinction I find highly suggestive in the light of my
thematic of painting and mirroring functions. Compare also Marin's comment that "the fact
that the painting of Medusa is not in any literal sense a self-portrait of the young Caravaggio
does not in any way prevent it from figuring the act of painting and scission that separates
the painting's gaze from the gesture of painting" (DP, p. 132), and his emphasis on the motif
of decapitation in other paintings by Caravaggio and others; see DRI pp. 133-35.
;id
Bi
:::~ i :
add that the lower right-hand corner of the canvas is often a strongly
marked location in Caravaggio's art, bearing as it does a special relation-
ship to the artist's right or painting hand: see for example the large bow
in the sash of the youth seated in the right foreground studying a musical
score in the Musicians; the dagger, partly concealed playing cards, and
gesture of the seated cardsharp reaching back to extract one of those
cards from beneath his doublet in the Fort Worth Cardsharps (1594-95?);
the elaborate swordhilts in the Rome and, especially, the Paris versions of
the Gypsy Fortuneteller (1594-95); and the incandescent green plant in the
Capitoline St. John the Baptist with a Ram (1601-1602).5o This is also the
50. In Caravaggio and His Two Cardinals, Gilbert argues at length that the protagonist
of the Capitoline picture is not St. John (who never is shown with a ram) but rather the
..Ak.
FIG. 15.-Caravaggio, Salome Receiving the Head ofJohn the Baptist, ca. 160
vas. National Gallery, London. Photo: Museum.
youthful Paris (a shepherd), anticipating the erotic adventure to come; see pp. 1-78. Gilbert
also suggests that the painting belongs to a structure of rivalry between Caravaggio and
Annibale, in which each implicitly criticized the other in turn in a series of works including
the Pastorfriso, as Gilbert calls the supposed St. John; see pp. 79-97.
51. See notes 26 and 28 for a brief indication of the sorts of issues I have in mind.
What is distinctly unCourbet-like about some of those works, however, is the way in which
the strategy of turning away from the viewer is combined with that of thereby addressing
or attracting his gaze, as by the concealed cards in the Cardsharps or, more spectacularly, by
the music-playing angel's gorgeous wings and floating drapery in the Rest on the Flight. The
result in both cases, as in the Musicians, is a complex, internally "mirroring" structure in
which the question of an easel painting's essential orientation-does it face the viewer or
does it face away from him (that is, in the direction the painter was facing when he made it
and the viewer is facing as he stands before it)?-is posed more forcefully than at any previ-
ous or subsequent moment in Western painting.
I Aw
52. See AC, pp. 352-53; Cinotti, Caravaggio, pp. 474-76; and C, pp. 252-54. My
thanks to Creighton Gilbert for lending me his photograph of The Martyrdom of St. Ursula
when I was unable to locate one anywhere else.
hence for painting) imply that the entire scene reflects a prior situation,
or perhaps we should say that it posits reflection, mirroring, at the very
origin of the initiatory act.56 At the same time, the scene is framed by, all
the personages are embedded in, a tarlike blackness that seems the nega-
tion not just of light but also of sight (ordinary chiaroscuro too has been
left far behind), as though for Caravaggio the ground of painting, of what
painting had become in his hands, were not only prior to vision but in
some fundamental sense inimical to it.57
In late May 1610 The Martyrdom of St. Ursula was shipped from Naples
to Prince Marcantonio Doria in Genoa; on 18 July Caravaggio, en route
back to Rome, died of fever at Porto Ercole at the age of thirty-nine. No
final work has ever seemed more palpably to mark the limits of an oeuvre,
or of an art.
[exhibition catalog, Philadelphia Museum of Art, 5 Nov.-31 Dec. 1988; Arthur M. Sackler
Museum, Harvard University Art Museums, Cambridge, Mass., 21 Jan.-19 Mar. 1989],
pp. 165-67).
56. Or perhaps one should say that it posits an originary "mimesis" in the sense given
the notion by Borch-Jacobsen in The Freudian Subject, pp. 53-126 and The Emotional Tie:
Psychoanalysis, Mimesis, and Affect, trans. Douglas Brick et al. (Stanford, Calif., 1993).
57. On realism in Caravaggio (and in Eakins's The Gross Clinic) as a "stunning" or a
"wounding" of seeing, see Fried, Realism, Writing, Disfiguration, pp. 64-65. Compare also
Marin's discussion of the role of black in Caravaggio's painting; see DP, pp. 150-64. And
compare Borch-Jacobsen's insistence that "'in the beginning' there is no one to see anything
at all; there is no 'one' to see oneself in front of oneself in a model-image (or, as it is so aptly
put in German, in a Vor-bild, a 'picture-in-front'). . . . Where the ego forms itself in the image
of the other, where it mimes the other, one can no longer speak either of 'form' or 'image,'
either of 'self' or 'other.' Where the id was (neither himself nor myself), the 'I' arrives. And
the id can no longer be expressed in the language of the visible, of perception, of phenome-
nality, nor, by the same token, in any sort of theory of models and images. The other stage
becomes a beyond-stage, a fore-stage of the primary mimesis" (The Freudian Subject, p. 118).
There is something uncannily appropriate in the fact that Lanfranco Massa, the Doria fami-
ly's correspondent and procurator in Naples, wrote to Marcantonio Doria (for whom the
painting was destined) "that he had already received the painting of Saint Ursula from
Caravaggio and was waiting for it to dry. However, exposure of the picture to the sun proved
deleterious, since, according to Massa, Caravaggio employed a thick varnish" (AC, p. 352).
(As if The Martyrdom of St. Ursula touches thereby on a problematic of photography.) Eventu-
ally I shall want to relate The Martyrdom of St. Ursula not only to earlier depictions of violent
death by Caravaggio such as the Judith Beheading Holofernes and The Martyrdom of St. Matthew
but also to a recently rediscovered canvas with which it has much in common (including a
similar portrait of the artist), the magnificent and riveting Taking of Christ in the National
Gallery of Ireland. On that painting, see Sergio Benedetti, "Caravaggio's 'Taking of Christ,'
a Masterpiece Rediscovered," Burlington Magazine 135 (Nov. 1993): 731-41.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Critical Inquiry
Andreas Huyssen
Eight years after the fall of the wall, seven years after the unification of
East and West Germany, and just a couple of years before the final trans-
fer of the national government from Bonn to Berlin, the city on the Spree
is a text frantically being written and rewritten. As Berlin has left behind
its heroic and propagandistic role as flashpoint of the cold war and strug-
gles to imagine itself as the new capital of a reunited nation, the city has
become something like a prism through which we can focus issues of con-
temporary urbanism and architecture, national identity and statehood,
historical memory and forgetting. Architecture has always been deeply
invested in the shaping of political and national identities, and the re-
building of Berlin as capital of Germany gives us significant clues to the
state of the German nation after the fall of the wall and about the ways
Germany projects its future.
As a literary critic I am attracted to the notion of the city as text, of
reading a city as a conglomeration of signs. Mindful of Italo Calvino's
marvellously suggestive Invisible Cities, we know how real and imaginary
spaces commingle in the mind to shape our notions of specific cities. No
matter where we begin our discussion of the city of signs-whether with
Victor Hugo's reading of Paris in Notre-Dame de Paris as a book written
in stone; with Alfred D6blin's attempt in Berlin Alexanderplatz to create a
57
montage of multiple city discourses jostling against each other like pas-
sersby on a crowded sidewalk; with Walter Benjamin's notion of the fla-
neur who reads urban objects in commemorative meditation; with Robert
Venturi's upbeat emphasis on architecture as image, meaning, and com-
munication; with Roland Barthes's city semiotics of the Empire of Signs;
with Thomas Pynchon's TV-screen city; or with Jean Baudrillard's aes-
thetic transfiguration of an immaterial New York-a few things should
be remembered: The trope of the city as book or text has existed as long
as we have had a modern city literature. There is nothing particularly
novel or postmodern about it. On the other hand, one may want to ask
why this notion of the city as sign and text reached such a critical mass
in the architectural discourse of the 1970s and 1980s, arguably the peak
of an architectural obsession with semiotics, rhetorics, and codings that
underwrote much of the debate about architectural postmodernism.
Whatever the explanation may be-and certainly there is no one simple
answer to this question-it seems clear that today this interest in the city
as sign, as text, is waning in much architectural discourse and practice,
both of which have by and large turned against an earlier fascination
with literary and linguistic models, no doubt at least partially as a result
of the new image-graphing technologies offered by ever more powerful
computers. The notion of the city as sign, however, is as pertinent as
before, even though now perhaps more in a pictorial and image-related
rather than a textual sense. But this shift from script to image comes
with a significant reversal. Put bluntly: The discourse of the city as text
in the 1970s was primarily a critical discourse involving architects, literary
critics, theorists, and philosophers bent on exploring and creating the
new vocabularies of urban space after modernism. The current discourse
of the city as image is one of "city fathers," developers, and politicians
trying to increase revenue from mass tourism, conventions, and office
or commercial rents. Central to this new kind of urban politics are aes-
thetic spaces for cultural consumption, megastores and blockbuster mu-
seal events, festivals, and spectacles of all kinds, all intended to lure the
new species of city tourist, the urban vacationer or metropolitan mara-
thoner who have replaced the older model of the leisurely flaneur. The
flaneur, even though something of an outsider in his city, was always fig-
ured as a dweller rather than as a traveler on the move. But today it is
the tourist rather than the flaneur to whom the new city culture wants to
appeal, just as it fears the tourist's unwanted double, the displaced mi-
grant.
There is a clear downside to this notion of the city as sign and image
in our global culture, nowhere as evident to me as in a recent front-page
article in the New York Times in which the paper's art critic celebrates the
newly Disneyfied and theme-parked Times Square as the ultimate of a
commercial billboard culture that has now, in this critic's skewed view,
become indistinguishable from real art.' One can only hope that the
transformation of Times Square from a haven for hustlers, prostitutes,
and junkies into a pop art installation will not presage the wholesale
transformation of Manhattan into a museum, a process already far ad-
vanced in some older European cities.
This brings me back to Berlin, a city justly famous for its glorious
museum collections but, due mainly to its decenteredness and vast exten-
sion, much less liable to turn into an urban museum space such as the
centers of Rome, Paris, and even London have become in recent decades.
Thus it is no great surprise that after an upsurge in the early 1990s, tour-
ism to Berlin is significantly down. This slump may of course have some-
thing to do with the fact that Berlin is currently the most energized site
for new urban construction anywhere in the Western world: enormously
exciting for people interested in architecture and urban transformation,
but for most others mainly an insufferable mess of dirt, noise, and traffic
jams. Once all this construction is completed, the hope is that Berlin will
take its rightful place as a European capital next to its more glamorous
competitors. But will it? After all, Berlin is in significant ways different
from other Western European capitals, in terms of its history as a capital
and as an industrial center as well as in terms of its buildings. And the
fact that the city is caught between the pressures of this new urban image-
politics and the more general crisis of architectural developments in these
last years of our century makes any such hope appear simply misplaced,
if not deluded. Indeed, Berlin may be the place to study how this new
emphasis on the city as cultural sign, combined with its role as capital
and the pressures of large-scale developments, prevents creative alterna-
tives and thus represents a false start into the twenty-first century. Berlin
may be well on the way to squandering a unique chance.
There is perhaps no other major Western city that bears the marks
of twentieth-century history as intensely and self-consciously as Berlin.
This city-text has been written, erased, and rewritten throughout this
1. See Michael Kimmelman, "That Flashing Crazy Quilt of Signs? It's Art," New York
Times, 31 Dec. 1996, pp. Al, C20.
violent century, and its legibility relies as much on visible markers of built
space as on images and memories repressed and ruptured by traumatic
events. Part palimpsest, part Wunderblock, Berlin now finds itself in a
frenzy of future projections and, in line with the general memorial obses-
sions of the 1990s, in the midst of equally intense debates about how to
negotiate its Nazi and communist pasts now that the safe dichotomies of
the cold war have vanished. The city is obsessed with architectural and
planning issues, a debate that functions like a prism illuminating the pit-
falls of urban development at this turn of the century. All of this in the
midst of a government- and corporation-run building boom of truly mon-
umental proportions. The goal is nothing less than to create the capital
of the twenty-first century, but this vision finds itself persistently haunted
by the past.
Berlin-as-text remains first and foremost a historical text, marked as
much, if not more, by absences as by the visible presence of its past, from
prominent ruins such as the Kaiser-Wilhelm-Gedichtniskirche at the end
of the famous Kurffirstendamm to World War II bullet and shrapnel
marks on many of its buildings. It was in the months after the collapse of
the East German state that our sensibility for the past of this city was
perhaps most acute, a city that for so long had stood in the eye of the
storm of politics in this century. Empire, war, and revolution; democracy,
fascism, Stalinism, and the cold war all were played out here. Indelibly
etched into our memory is the idea of Berlin as the capital site of a discon-
tinuous, ruptured history, of the collapse of four successive German
states; as the ground of literary expressionism and the revolt against the
old order; as the epicenter of the vibrant cultural avant-gardism of Wei-
mar and its elimination by Nazism; as the command center of world war
and the Holocaust; and, finally, as the symbolic space of the East-West
confrontation of the nuclear age, with American and Soviet tanks staring
each other down at Checkpoint Charlie, which is now being turned into
an American business center watched over, temporarily, by the towering
photographic cut-out figure of Philip Johnson and a shrunk, gilded
Statue of Liberty placed atop the former East German watchtower (figs.
1 and 2).
If at that confusing and exhilarating time after the fall of the wall
Berlin seemed saturated with memories, the years since have also taught
us multiple lessons about the politics of willful forgetting: the imposed
and often petty renaming of streets in East Berlin, which were given back
their presocialist, and often decidedly antisocialist, cast; the dismantling
of monuments to socialism; the absurd debate about tearing down the
GDR's Palace of the Republic to make room for a rebuilding of the
Hohenzollern palace; and so forth. This was not just tinkering with the
communist city-text. It was a strategy of power and humiliation, a final
burst of cold war ideology, pursued via a politics of signs, much of it
wholly unnecessary and with a predictable political fallout in an East Ger-
p i.i
l!j
i'!!! ,. ... ......." ..........?.......... .. ..
. ... ..
.~~aII~
..... .
i: i ,.= :;:.Z-0
.-N-94-N M%
X . ... .. . ....
-X-%:- :X."
?.r
.... i? ii ~ i ::": ]
:..
.....
t't :'::
..' ??? ?. I :
man population that felt increasingly deprived of its life history and of its
memories of four decades of separate development. Even though not all
of the plans to dismantle monuments and to rename streets came to fru-
ition, the damage was done. GDR nostalgia and an upsurge of support
for the revamped communist party, the Partei des demokratischen Sozia-
lismus (PDS), were the inevitable political results, even among many in
the younger generation who had been active in the opposition to the state
in the 1980s.
Forgetting is equally privileged in an official ad campaign of 1996,
literally written all over the city: "Berlin wird" (Berlin becomes). But "be-
comes what"? Instead of a proper predicate, we get a verbal void. Indeed,
this phrasing may reflect wise precaution, for in the current chaos of pub-
lic planning, backroom scheming, and contradictory politicking, with
many architectural developments (Spreeinsel and Alexanderplatz among
them) still hanging in the air, their feasibility and financing insecure, no-
body seems to know exactly what Berlin will become. But the optimistic
subtext of the ellipsis is quite clear and is radically opposed to Karl Schef-
fler's 1910 lament that it is the tragic destiny of Berlin "forever to become
and never to be."2 Too much of the current construction and planning
actually lacks the very dynamism and energy of turn-of-the-century Ber-
lin that Scheffler, ever the cultural pessimist, lamented. Since much of
central Berlin in the mid-1990s is a gigantic construction site, a hole in
the ground, a void, there are indeed ample reasons to emphasize the void
rather than to celebrate Berlin's current state of becoming.
The notion of Berlin as a void is more than a metaphor, and not just
a transitory condition. It does carry historical connotations. As early as
1935 the marxist philosopher Ernst Bloch, in his Erbschaft dieser Zeit, de-
scribed life in Weimar Berlin as "functions in the void."3 He then referred
to the vacuum left by the collapse of a nineteenth-century bourgeois cul-
ture that had found its spatial expression in the heavy, ornamental, stone
architecture of Berlin's unique apartment buildings, the pejoratively
named Mietkasernen (rent barracks) with their multiple wings in the back,
the so-called Hinterhduser, which enclosed inner courtyards accessible
from the street only through tunnel-like archways. The post-World War
I vacuum was filled by a functionalist and, to Bloch, insubstantial culture
of distraction: Weimar modernism, the movie palaces, the six-day bicycle
?.......
.......
Wft:
....
FIG. 3.-Wall area between Leipziger Platz and the Brandenburg Gate.
races, the new modernist architecture, the glitz and glamor of the so-
called stabilization phase before the 1929 crash. Bloch's phrasing "func-
tions in the void" also articulated the insight that, in the age of monopoly
capitalism, built city space could no longer command the representative
functions of an earlier age. As Brecht put it in those same years, when he
discussed the need for a new, postmimetic realism, reality itself had be-
come functional, thus requiring entirely new modes of representation.4
A little over a decade later, it was left to fascism to transform Berlin
into the literal void that was the landscape of ruins in 1945. Especially in
the center of Berlin, British and American bombers had joined forces
with Albert Speer's wrecking crews who had intended to create a tabula
rasa for Germania, the renamed capital of a victorious Reich. And the
creation of voids did not stop then; it continued through the 1950s under
the heading of Sanierung (urban renewal) when entire quarters of the old
4. See especially Bertolt Brecht, 'Against Georg Lukacs," trans. Stuart Hood, in Ernst
Bloch et al., Aesthetics and Politics (London, 1977), pp. 68-85.
W 4-
N 1.
44
13
-kL
ot
. ...... .....
4A, .
R El :e? X,-
jNN:
L ... .. .....
?;?F a
;tm
. ...... .....
'NN
N ag
. . . . . . . . . . .
ON,'
W E.-
... .............. ..
.. .. ..... . .. ....
FIG. 4.--Alb
lumbia Unive
Berlin were
of modern
jor constru
void, that o
through th
embrace (fi
East Europe
European c
long time r
the Frontst
When the
rative of v
spooky rev
threshold b
seventeen-
..... .
'N .. . ....
:~::: .. . . ? .. . :i. ..... . . .. ..
...... ~ .. .. , . .... .
....-: :: !N :.-...... . .... ... ....... I_: . . .... .
MMWWV
down to Potsdamer Platz and Leipziger Platz, a wide stretch of dirt, grass,
and remnants of pavement under a big sky that seemed even bigger given
the absence of a high-rise skyline that is so characteristic of this city. Ber-
liners called it affectionately their "wonderful city steppes," their "prairie
of history."5 It was a haunting space, crisscrossed by a maze of footpaths
leading nowhere. One slight elevation marked the remnants of the bun-
ker of Hitler's SS guard, which after being reopened when the wall came
down was soon sealed shut again by the city authorities to avoid making
it into a site of neo-Nazi pilgrimage. Walking across this space that had
been a mined no-man's-land framed by the wall and that now served occa-
sionally as a staging site for rock concerts and other transitory cultural
attractions, I could not help remembering that this tabula rasa had once
been the site of Hitler's Reichskanzlei and the space to be occupied by
Speer's megalomaniac north-south axis from the Great Hall in the north
to Hitler's triumphal arch in the south, all to be completed by 1950, the
power center of the empire of a thousand years (fig. 4). In the summer
of 1991, when most of the wall had already been removed, auctioned off,
or sold to tourists in bits and pieces, the area was studded with the wall's
steel rods left behind by the Mauerspechte, the wall chippers, and decor-
ated with colorful triangular paper leaves that were blowing and rustling
in the wind; they powerfully marked the void as second nature and as
memorial (fig. 5). The installation increased the uncanny feeling: a void
saturated with invisible history, with memories of architecture both built
5. Quoted in Francesca Rogier, "Growing Pains: From the Opening of the Wall to the
Wrapping of the Reichstag," Assemblage 29 (1996): 50.
and unbuilt. It gave rise to the desire to leave it as it was, the memorial
as empty page right in the center of the reunified city, the center that was
and always had been at the same time the threshold between the Eastern
and Western parts of the city, the space that now, in yet another layer of
signification, seemed to be called upon to represent the invisible wall in
the head that still separated East and West Germans and that was antici-
pated by Peter Schneider long before the actual wall came down.6
Since then, the rebuilding of this empty center of Berlin has become
a major focus of all discussions about the Berlin of tomorrow. With the
new government quarter in the bend of the river Spree next to the Reich-
stag in the north and the corporate developments at Potsdamer Platz and
Leipziger Platz at the southern end of this space, Berlin will indeed gain
a new center of corporate and governmental power. But how important
should the city center be for the cities of the future? After all, the city as
center and the centered city are themselves in question today. Bernard
Tschumi puts it well when he asks, "How can architecture, whose histori-
cal role was to generate the appearance of stable images (monuments,
order, etc.) deal with today's culture of the disappearance of unstable
images (twenty-four-image-per-second cinema, video and computer-
generated images)?"'7 For some net surfers and virtual-city flaneurs, the
built city itself has become obsolete. Others, however, such as Saskia
Sassen, the New York urbanist, or Dieter Hoffmann-Axthelm, the well-
known Berlin architecture critic, have argued persuasively that it is
precisely the growth of global telecommunications and the potential
dispersal of population and resources that have created a new logic for
concentration in what Sassen calls the global city.8 Indeed, the city as cen-
ter is far from becoming obsolete. But, as center, the city is increasingly
affected and structured by our culture of media images. In the move
from the city as regional or national center of production to the city as
international center of communications, media, and services, the very im-
age of the city itself becomes central to its success in a globally competitive
world. From New York's new Times Square, with its culture industry
giants Disney and Bertelsmann and its ecstasies of flashing commer-
cial signage, to Berlin's new Potsdamer Platz, with Sony, Mercedes, and
Brown Boveri, visibility equals success (fig. 6).
Not surprisingly, then, the major concern in developing and rebuild-
ing key sites in the heart of Berlin seems to be with image rather than
use, attractiveness for tourists and official visitors rather than heteroge-
neous living space for Berlin's inhabitants, erasure of memory rather than
its imaginative preservation. The new architecture is to enhance the de-
sired image of Berlin as capital and global metropolis of the twenty-first
This tension has produced a very sharp debate in which the bat-
tlelines between the defenders of a national tradition and the advocates
of a contemporary high-tech global architecture are firmly entrenched.
The traditionalists champion a local and national concept of urban cul-
ture that they call "critical reconstruction."' Its representatives, such as
Hans Stimmann, the city's director of building from 1991 to 1996, and
Vittorio Lampugnani, former director of Frankfurt's Museum of Archi-
tecture, call for a new simplicity that seems to aim at a mix of Karl
Friedrich Schinkel's classicism and Peter Behrens's once-daring modern-
9. Some of the key contributions to the debate about critical reconstruction are col-
lected in Einfach schwierig: Eine deutsche Architekturdebatte, ed. Gert Kihler (Braunschweig,
1995).
...~:
....
n?; . .
?,, :,,
. . ... .. . . . : 1... . .
p . . ... . . .. .:. . . .: . . .
FIG. 6.-Sony Center, Potsdamer Platz. Architect: Helmut Jahn. Model. From Info Box:
Der Katalog (1996).
11. Hans Stimmann, "Conclusion: From Building Boom to Building Type," in Anne-
gret Burg, Downtown Berlin: Building the Metropolitan Mix/Berlin Mitte: Die Entstehung einer ur-
banen Architektur, ed. Stimmann, trans. Ingrid Taylor, Christian Caryl, and Robin Benson
(Berlin, 1995).
S41,
.......
. ..... ..
. .. .. . ... .. i
10
?i .i
FIG. 8.-Construction site, Posdamer Platz, seen from Potsdamer Platz subway station,
1996. Photo: author.
;imp
".... ?
.:.:
. ..
.: . ...
.
2
?~
? r
FIG. 9.-Construction site, Potsdamer Platz, seen from Info Box roof terrace,
1996. Photo: author.
are already going belly-up, and though Berlin already has surplus office
space for rental, more is being built every day. Thus my fear for the future
of Potsdamer Platz and Leipziger Platz is that just as the Info Box immo-
bilizes the flaneur facing the screen, the tight corporate structures,
despite gesturing toward public spaces and piazzas, will encage and con-
fine their visitors rather than re-creating the open, mobile, and multiply
coded urban culture that once characterized this pivotal traffic hub be-
tween the Eastern and Western parts of the city. There is good reason to
doubt whether Helmut Jahn's happy tent, which hovers above the central
plaza of the Sony development, will make up for the loss of urban life
that these developments will inevitably entail.
Looking at the forces and pressures that currently shape the new
Berlin, one may well fear that the ensemble of architectural solutions
proposed may represent the worst start into the twenty-first century one
could imagine for this city. Many of the major construction projects, it
seems, have been designed against the city rather than for it. Some of
them look like corporate spaceships reminiscent of the conclusion of Close
Encounters of the Third Kind (fig. 13). The trouble is, they are here to stay.
M m?:i::?:?ll?- ?~
AM
The void in the center of Berlin will have been filled. But memories of
that haunting space from the months and years after the wall came down
will linger. The one architect who understood the nature of this empty
space in the center of Berlin was Daniel Libeskind, who in 1992 made
the following proposal:
Rilke once said that everything is already there. We only must see it
and protect it. We must develop a feel for places, streets, and houses
that need our support. Take the open area at the Potsdamer Platz. I
suggest a wilderness, one kilometer long, within which everything
can stay as it is. The street simply ends in the bushes. Wonderful.
After all, this area is the result of today's divine natural law: nobody
wanted it, nobody planned it, and yet it is firmly implanted in all our
minds. And there in our minds, this image of the Potsdamer Platz
void will remain for decades. Something like that cannot be easily
erased, even if the whole area is developed.12
12. Daniel Libeskind, "Daniel Libeskind mit Daniel Libeskind: Potsdamer Platz"
(1992), in Radix-Matrix: Architekturen und Schriften, ed. Alois Martin Miller (Munich, 1994),
p. 149.
] .. . ........... . .
"N.
:!i : :: X
'JIM
............... .
. ..'
:iX X:?
j ,,
FIG. 1
nen w
......:::... . .
x : ." . . .... .. .. . . . . . . ...
..... .
. .. ....
. . ... . .. .. ... ..... ....
. . . .....: ........ . . .. .
. . . ... .... ... .
? ? .i : . . .::::: . ' .. ::: !:i , .
...
1944-45, which left little of the old Potsdamer Platz standing; the build-
ing of the wall in 1961, which required a further clearing of the area; the
tearing down of the wall in 1989, which made this whole area between
the Brandenburg Gate and Potsdamer Platz into that prairie of history
that Berliners quickly embraced. It was a void filled with history and
memory, all of which will be erased (I'm less sanguine about the power of
memory than Libeskind) by the new construction.
However, in light of Libeskind's own architectural project, which is
crucially an architecture of memory, even his suggestion to leave the void
as it was in the early 1990s was not just romantic and impractical. For
Libeskind gave architectural form to another void that haunts Berlin, the
historical void left by the Nazi destruction of Berlin's thriving Jewish life
and culture. A discussion of Libeskind's museum project, arguably the
single most interesting building currently going up in Berlin, is appro-
priate here not only because it gives a different inflection to the notion
of Berlin as void in relation to memory and history but more importantly
because, however indirectly, it raises the issue of German national identity
and the identity of Berlin. While all the other major building sites in
Berlin today are inevitably haunted by the past, only Libeskind's building
attempts to articulate memory and our relationship to it in its very spa-
tial organization.
41
*NOW*
1110
?,:,
WO'7
.... .. .. .. .. .
. .............
USi;??i:w: ??
In 1989, just a few months before the wall fell, Libeskind was the
surprise winner of a competition to build the expansion of the Berlin
Museum with the Jewish Museum, as it is awkwardly and yet appropri-
ately called (fig. 14). The Berlin Museum was founded in 1962 as a local
history museum for the Western part of the divided city, clearly in reac-
tion to the building of the wall, which had made the former local history
museum, the Mairkisches Museum, inaccessible. Since the late 1970s, the
Berlin Museum has had a Jewish section, which documents the role of
German Jewry in the history of Berlin (currently housed in the Martin-
Gropius-Bau). With the new expansion, the museum was to consist of
three parts: one displaying a general history of Berlin from 1870 to the
present, one representing the history ofJews in Berlin, and an in-between
space dedicated to the theme of Jews in society that would articulate the
relations and crossovers between the other two components. Libeskind's
proposal was as architecturally daring as it was conceptually persuasive,
and even though multiple resistances-political, aesthetic, and eco-
nomic-had to be overcome, the museum is being built and is to be fin-
ished in the fall of 1997.
The expansion sits next to the old Berlin Museum, a baroque palace
that used to house the Berlin Chamber Court before the space became a
N.ii
..;iii!
.. N . ........
.. . : ::i.):..++ i
~ ?? . . ;:..;: .:.i~Ni z
is
.. .......::i:??;n:
. ?iidi
.? . ?????:N-..
.. ..-..
........"
??+~?:?:i: ':C ??...';7
. . . .++::
???:i .. .i:
..:::. :?:j
+:+:?:?:?:;? ?: :?. .. ? .. ii~ii~iii6iiR~i
. F N. ,
.-.N-<
:x
.4 Mo ". - I
-.4 m i: N 4~i!~~r~ *~~'"~s~l
x: M . - N N X?u:: 'N ::MV:".
N. :X... -X: ?il:io -6
U4 N X.NX,8::-4X
MX:.,::.MM x: .': ? ??;~?;?:;
..M:?:ii.i
M% -M :X.: N?
4..:.
N f:.:: ::Ay M-
:?;?;;;:iig iH liLl!~~!
FIG. 15.-Berlin Museum with the Jewish Museum. Plan. Bfiro Daniel
Libeskind.
museum. The old and the new parts are apparently disconnected, and
the only entrance to the expansion building is underground from the old
building. Libeskind's structure has often been described as a zigzag, as
lightning, or, since it is to house a Jewish collection, as a fractured Star of
David. He himself has called it "Between the Lines." The ambiguity be-
tween an architecturally spatial and a literary meaning (one reads be-
tween the lines) is intended and indeed suggests the conceptual core of
the project. The basic structure of the building is found in the relation
between two lines, one straight but broken into pieces, divided into frag-
ments, the other multiply bent, contorted, but potentially going on ad
infinitum (fig. 15). Architecturally the longitudinal axis translates into a
thin slice of empty space that crosses the path of the zigzag structure at
?;i : ......
N:~i ?
i~~diiii::lgiiiiil:r:, ,,:,i% :
...................
each intersection and that reaches from the bottom of the building to
the top. It is sealed to the exhibition halls of the museum. Only at the
underground entry into the expansion building can the visitor physically
step into a section of this empty space. Elsewhere it cannot be entered,
but it is accessible to view from the small bridges that cross it at every
level of the building; it is a view into an abyss extending downward and
upward at the same time. Libeskind calls it the void (figs. 16 and 17).
This fractured and multiply interrupted void functions as a spine for the
building. It is both conceptual and literal. And, clearly, it signifies: As void
it signifies absence, the absence of Berlin's Jews, most of whom perished
i::: . i::?iiii
. .,.rl
?:iii?? :?:ii?i
.4 ["... .....
.. .........
.............i
.. .................
... .... ..........? .
14. This is implied by Derrida for whom a void that represents is no longer a void
proper. See Derrida, "Jacques Derrida zu 'Between the Lines."'
15. At the time of this writing, it is not clear what will be built as the "Monument to
the Murdered Jews of Europe." A 1995 competition with a total of 527 entries ended in a
public outcry over the winning entry, a slanted concrete slab the size of two football fields
with millions of victims' names carved in stone. Even Helmut Kohl did not like it, though
surely for the wrong reasons. A new competition is anticipated for later this year.
16. I am only talking here about the building as architecture. Its museal and curatorial
functions are still too much in flux for us to comment with any degree of certainty about
the ways in which the exhibition spaces will be used or even about who will have ultimate
curatorial control over the expansion space.
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
http://www.jstor.com/stable/1344160?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Critical Inquiry
Brigid Doherty
The photomontages were given to her in a sealed envelope. When she opened the
envelope, she experienced such a shock that she does not recall clearly what she did
afterwards. Unable to speak or breathe normally, she seemed to be in great physical
and emotional distress and was perspiring heavily. When finally she was able to
speak, she explained that she had just had a great shock and pointed to the photo-
montages.
Those lines paraphrase testimony recently given in a civil suit before
a Massachusetts court.' The defendant in the suit was the maker of the
photomontages, which were images of the plaintiff, the woman who
opened the envelope. When the incident with the photomontages oc-
curred, the defendant and the plaintiff were coworkers in an office, and
Earlier versions of this essay were presented at the Johns Hopkins University in De-
cember 1995 and at the University of Manchester in March 1996; the present version bene-
fited from comments and criticisms offered on each occasion, particularly those of Elizabeth
Cropper, Michael Fried, Anton Kaes, Paul Lerner, and Mark Micale. I am also indebted to
T. J. Clark, Martin Jay, Richard Meyer, Paolo Morante, and Anne Wagner for their re-
sponses to versions of this material in various forms; and I am especially grateful to Ruth
Leys for her comments on the penultimate draft. An abbreviated version of this essay will
appear in Traumatic Pasts: Studies in History, Psychiatry, and Trauma in the Modern Age, edited
by Lerner and Micale (forthcoming). My research was supported by the Fulbright Commis-
sion; the Berlin Program for Advanced German and European Studies at the Freie Uni-
versitit, Berlin; the Western Europe Program of the American Council of Learned Societies
and the Social Science Research Council; and the Mabelle McLeod Lewis Memorial Fund.
Unless otherwise noted, all translations are my own.
1. See Bowman v. Heller, 1993 WL (WestLaw Legal Database) 761159 (Mass.Super., 9
July 1993), memorandum and order; hereafter abbreviated BH1993.
82
the plaintiff was a candidate in a local union election campaign. The de-
fendant was not a supporter of the plaintiff's candidacy, and the photo-
montages were conceived, he said, as a vehicle for his critical opinion of
her campaign.
To make the pictures, the defendant clipped from campaign post-
cards several captioned photographic portraits of the plaintiff-a "stern,
bespectacled" woman in her mid-sixties2-and pasted the plaintiff's face
and name to photographs of "nude and partially nude female bodies in
sexually explicit poses" (BH1993), which he had selected from porno-
graphic magazines. The defendant then photocopied the resulting com-
posite images, posted several of them by his desk, and distributed a few
others to colleagues in the office, envisioning his endeavor as "'a private
satire among a select group of friends,'" " a bawdy joke disparaging a can-
didate running for administrative office." Copies of the pictures were
eventually given to the plaintiff by her campaign manager, who, appar-
ently anticipating the plaintiff's response, delivered them to her in the
sealed envelope mentioned above.
The pictures inside the envelope were crude photomontages, images
assembled by cutting and pasting disparate photographs and juxtaposing
mismatched body parts. The idea of the photomontages was so crude,
the Massachusetts court ruled, that their creation and distribution in
photocopied form amounted to an "outrageous attack" (BH1993) and an
"intentional and reckless infliction of emotional distress"5 by the defen-
dant upon the plaintiff. The court's ruling and the substantial monetary
award for damages that accompanied it were based on the plaintiff's phys-
ical and emotional reaction to the photomontages. That reaction was, the
plaintiff claimed, traumatic.
Testimony from a clinical psychologist who had treated the plaintiff
was crucial to the case. The psychologist's diagnosis: Post-Traumatic
Stress Disorder (PTSD), which she described as a condition "triggered by
an event outside the normal range of human experience" and character-
ized by symptoms including "psychogenic amnesia," "exaggerated startle
response, psychic numbness," and "loss of interest in formerly pleasur-
able activities" (BH1993).6 Based on the psychologist's testimony, the
court determined that "the specific event which caused the PTSD" was
the plaintiff's viewing of the photomontages (BH1993).
Several aspects of this civil case decided in Boston in 1995 have
prompted me to use it to introduce an essay whose subject is the avant-
garde art of dada montage, produced in Berlin around 1920. First, there
is the vivid description of the plaintiff's traumatic psychophysical reaction
to the photomontages, a reaction that I shall argue is strikingly similar to
the reaction the Berlin dadaists attempted to effect in the beholders of
their work. Second, there is the notion that a volatile mix of sexuality and
politics plays a part in the trauma caused by photomontage, a notion I
take to be central to the project of Berlin dada, although it is not the
focus of my argument here. Third, and most important for my purposes
in this essay, there is the suggestion that the capacity to induce trauma
inheres specifically in the form of photomontage, where the beholder's
traumatic experience is, so to speak, already embodied in the composite
image of a figure whose parts do not match-where, to put it another
way, traumatic shock is made visible in a fragmented body such as the one
whose "sexually explicit" pose appears in radical contrast to its "stern,
bespectacled" face.
6. The terms of the diagnosis correspond to those listed under category A of PTSD in
the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3d ed. (Washington, D.C., 1987). On
PTSD, see Judith Lewis Herman, Trauma and Recovery (New York, 1992); and the introduc-
tions by Cathy Caruth as well as essays by Laura S. Brown ("Not Outside the Range: One Femi-
nist Perspective on Psychic Trauma") and by Bessel A. van der Kolk and Onno van der Hart
("The Intrusive Past: The Flexibility of Memory and the Engraving of Trauma") in Trauma:
Explorations in Memory, ed. Caruth (Baltimore, 1995), pp. 3-12, 100-12, 151-57, and 158-82.
another problem hitherto considered only from the psychological side, that of artistic
endowment, is in hysteria illuminated to some extent from its organic side. Hysteria
is, as Freud says, a caricature of art [ein Zerrbild der Kunst]. Hysterical 'materializa-
tions', however, show us the organism in its preparedness for art [Kunstfertigkeit]. It
might prove that the purely 'autoplastic' artworks [rein "autoplastische" Kunststiicke] of
the hysteric are prototypes, not only for the bodily productions [kdrperliche Produktio-
nen] of artistes and actors [Artisten und Schauspieler], but also for the work of those
visual artists [bildende Kiinstler] who no longer manipulate their own bodies but
material from the external world [Material der Aussenwelt bearbeiten]. [Ferenczi,
"The Phenomena of Hysterical Materialization," p. 104; "Hysterische Materialisa-
tionsphinomene," 3:146-47; trans. mod.]
8. For a thorough account of the charges against the dadaists and the resulting trial
in April 1921, see Rosamunde Neugebauer, George Grosz-Macht und Ohnmacht satirischer
Kunst: Die Graphikfolgen "Gott mit uns," "Ecce homo" und "Hintergrund" (Berlin, 1993), pp.
51-78.
in i
:. . : . . .. .
.... .
. . .
X c..,.
9. Eager to promote the Dada Fair, the dadaists hired a professional photographer to
document the exhibition and distributed the photographs as publicity pictures to newspa-
pers and magazines. The dadaists' promotional campaign was quite successful: the Dada
Fair received dozens of published reviews both in Germany and abroad-most of them
decidedly hostile, not to say outraged, a few baffled but amused. Indeed, newspapers all
over the world devoted space to the Dada Fair, with articles appearing, for example, in
Prague, Paris, Milan, London, New York, Buenos Aires, and El Paso, Texas. I should like
to thank Richard Sheppard of Magdalen College, Oxford, who generously shared with me
materials from his archive of dada press clippings. Another extraordinary collection of such
materials can be found among the Coupures de Presse in the Tristan Tzara Archive, Biblio-
theque Litt6raire Jacques Doucet, Paris.
.........
;.::::" '"':++;+
.:: ... ..
Ini TVi~lAil
++++!++++
++=+N: ~ ~ t~~g L~~;1~alYi~~ ... .. ... ,..
The highest art will be that which in its conscious content presents
the thousandfold problems of the day, an art which one can see has
let itself be thrown by the explosions of the last week, which is forever
gathering up its limbs after yesterday's crash. The best and most ex-
traordinary artists will be those who every hour snatch the tatters of
their bodies out of the frenzied cataract of life, holding fast to the
intellect of their time, bleeding from hands and hearts."
Jung, see Fritz Mierau, "Leben und Schriften des Franz Jung: Eine Chronik," in Der Torpe-
dokafer: Hommage a Franz Jung, ed. Lutz Schulenberg (Hamburg, 1988), pp. 133-86, on
which I draw here. On Jung and Berlin dada, see Hanne Bergius, Das Lachen Dadas: Die
Berliner Dadaisten und ihre Aktionen (GieBen, 1989), pp. 66-81, and Jennifer E. Michaels,
FranzJung: Expressionist, Dadaist, Revolutionary, and Outsider (New York, 1989).
11. Richard Huelsenbeck, "Dadaist Manifesto," quoted in Huelsenbeck, En Avant
Dada: A History of Dadaism, trans. Ralph Manheim, in The Dada Painters and Poets: An Anthol-
ogy, ed. Robert Motherwell, 2d ed. (1951; Cambridge, Mass., 1988), p. 40; trans. mod. It is
worth noting here that Huelsenbeck was a medical student at the time the "Dadaist Mani-
festo" was written and that he indeed went on to specialize in neuropsychiatry in the early
twenties and, having fled Germany in 1936, to practice psychoanalysis under the name
Charles R. Hulbeck in New York City. See Hans J. Kleinschmidt, "The New Man-Armed
with the Weapons of Doubt and Defiance," introduction to Huelsenbeck, Memoirs ofa Dada
Drummer, trans. Joachim Neugroschel (1974; Berkeley, 1991), p. xxv. See also Richard Shep-
pard, "Richard Huelsenbeck (1892-1974): Dada and Psychoanalysis," Literaturwissenschaft-
lichesJahrbuch 26 (1985): 271-305; Karin Ffillner, Richard Huelsenbeck: Texte und Aktionen eines
Dadaisten (Heidelberg, 1983); Greil Marcus, Lipstick Traces: A Secret History of the Twentieth
Century (Cambridge, Mass., 1989), pp. 187-244; and Weltdada Huelsenbeck: eine Biografie in
Briefen und Bildern, ed. Herbert Kapfer and Lisbeth Exner (Innsbruck, 1996).
12. Walter Benjamin, "On Some Motifs in Baudelaire" (1939), Illuminations, trans.
Harry Zohn, ed. Hannah Arendt (New York, 1968), p. 163. In "On Some Motifs in Baude-
laire," Benjamin takes Freud's Beyond the Pleasure Principle (1920) as the source of his psycho-
analytic model of traumatic shock. See Sigmund Freud, Beyond the Pleasure Principle, in The
Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud, trans. and ed. James Stra-
chey, 24 vols. (London, 1953-74), 18:7-64. In this essay, I turn instead to the slightly earlier
work of Ferenczi, Freud's colleague, which was based on Ferenczi's firsthand experience
with war neurotics in World War I military hospitals and which I believe speaks more di-
rectly to dada montage. I discuss Benjamin and Baudelaire in relation to Berlin dada and
consider the potential interpretative usefulness of Beyond the Pleasure Principle for our under-
standing of dada in the larger study, Berlin Dada Montage (in progress), of which the present
essay is part. For a reading of surrealism that discusses both Benjamin and Beyond the Plea-
sure Principle extensively, see Hal Foster, Compulsive Beauty (Cambridge, Mass., 1993).
13. "Die Simulanten des Irrsinns auf dem Vortragspult," Neue Berliner 12. Uhr Zeitung,
20 May 1919. The announcement might also be read as suggesting that many who had
taken the stage to speak out for or against the war were "insane."
14. My understanding of the war neuroses is indebted to the recent work of Paul
Lerner, "Hysterical Men: War, Neurosis, and German Mental Medicine, 1914-1921" (Ph.D.
diss., Columbia University, 1996), parts of which I had the pleasure of reading in drafts
during the summer and fall of 1995, and Lerner, "Rationalizing the Therapeutic Arsenal:
German Neuropsychiatry in World War I," in Medicine and Modernity: Public Health and Medi-
demic proportions in the German army during World War I, with sol-
diers displaying psychogenic physical symptoms including tics and
tremors, paralysis, hyperaesthesia of one or all the senses, swooning, cata-
tonia, mutism, blindness, deafness, stuttering, rhythmical screaming, and
crawling on all fours, along with psychical symptoms such as depression,
terror, anxiety, a tendency to outbursts of rage, and a general lapse into
atavistic or infantile methods of reaction.15 It was those physical and psy-
chical symptoms of shock that Berlin dada simulated by employing the
technique of montage.
It is worth mentioning that, whether simulated or not, the madness
of the modern artist is a commonplace reiterated by modernism's ene-
mies and by its friends. It is a commonplace that was invoked often
enough in avant-garde circles in the years surrounding World War I, and
with particular force and frequency in Berlin and Paris during the 1920s,
especially in the context of dada and surrealism. And insanity was every-
where one looked as far as art was concerned in Germany in the 1930s-
in the pages of National Socialist newspapers and in catalogues and
speeches churned out around degenerate art exhibitions. Dada figured
prominently in those discourses, and from the movement's inception
there was no lack of accusations or metaphors of insanity among contem-
porary responses to Berlin dada's endeavors.
In addition to its vehemence, what makes the discourse of madness
that grew up around Berlin dada interesting is that the accusations of
insanity occasionally took explicitly clinical, diagnostic forms. For ex-
ample, a psychiatrist from Berlin's Charit6 hospital encountered the work
of the dadaists and declared, in an article that was published in a number
of German newspapers in July and August 1920, that he was familiar
from his observations of the mentally ill with artworks like those made by
the dadaists. The psychiatrist spoke of such objects being produced in
particular by mental patients in catatonic states, and he assured his read-
cal Care in Nineteenth- and Twentieth-Century Germany, ed. Manfred Berg and Geoffrey Cocks
(Cambridge, 1997), pp. 121-48. I should like to thank Lerner in particular for his generos-
ity in providing me with information about the so-called active treatment of the war neuro-
ses in the German context, discussed below in relation to Berlin dada. Other indispensable
sources on the traumatic neuroses of World War I are Eric Leed, No Man's Land: Combat and
Identity in World War I (Cambridge, 1979), especially pp. 163-92, and two recent articles by
Ruth Leys, "Traumatic Cures: Shell Shock, Janet, and the Question of Memory," Critical
Inquiry 20 (Summer 1994): 623-62 and "Death Masks: Kardiner and Ferenczi on Psychic
Trauma," Representations, no. 53 (Winter 1996): 44-73.
15. I have drawn my list of symptoms largely from PWN. The symptomatology of the
war neuroses is notoriously broad, and other lists could be assembled; see, for example, the
detailed list in Leys, "Death Masks," p. 48. For obvious reasons, many of the symptoms I
have chosen relate directly to the representation of trauma in Berlin dada, while others are
provided to give the reader a sense of the range of ways that trauma manifested itself in the
war neuroses.
ers that the art of the insane was "much more careful" and "far less sim-
ple" than dada. According to the doctor, even patients with psychogenic
paralyses produced self-portraits that were more successful in terms of
draughtsmanship than their dada counterparts. Noting that "there is a
wide range of... mental illnesses in which the patient has a compulsion
for activity and control in the 'dadaist sense,"' the doctor remarked on
several formal qualities shared by Berlin dada and art made by patients
in catatonic states: "a red thread runs through all of them: with insuffi-
cient means and inadequate materials, pictures and handicrafts are made
in a childish manner and a bizarre style." "In the mental ward of the
Charit6," he continued, "we have a little exhibition of such works. [And
now] we have [found] in the dadaist artworks a borderline case of a symp-
tom complex somewhere between an organic mental illness and a more
generalized psychopathology, and so we psychiatrists are grateful to the
dadaists for their exhibition. Whether one does right by the people by
letting them see it, is questionable: the collection belongs in the Charit."'16
The psychiatrist's diagnosis and his conceit of professional gratitude for
the dadaists' display of their own symptom complex are directed towards
the predictable conclusion that the proper place for dada art is in a men-
tal hospital. But that conclusion in this case has a political dimension: the
psychiatrist makes plain his anxiety about the risk of letting the people
(das Volk) behold dada; he sees in dada's "bizarre style" and "childish man-
ner" a capacity for political as well as psychopathological agitation. A
double-page spread for a dada magazine, which was never published but
was framed and displayed at the Dada Fair (fig. 3), shows a photograph
ofJohn Heartfield with a caption approximating the psychiatrist's evalua-
tion: "Send the painters to the madhouse!" (Steckt die Maler ins Irrenhaus),
shouts Heartfield from his angry mouth, fists clenched for emphasis,
16. Werner Leibbrand, "Da-Da, Betrachtung eines Arztes," General Anzeiger (Mann-
heim), 21 July 1920; originally published in 7Tgliche Rundschau (Berlin). The "organic men-
tal illness" with which Leibbrand associated dada is referred to elsewhere in the article
specifically as "jugendliches Irresein (Hebrephemie)" (dementia praecox), a condition
sometimes described in the clinical literature as having symptoms in common with the war
neuroses, especially where regression and the disruption of adult male sexuality were con-
cerned. On this point, see PWN, p. 17. It is worth noting here that war neurotics were
treated at the Psychiatrische und Nervenklinik der kiniglichen Charite, Berlin, during and
after World War I. Prominent among the Charite doctors was Karl Bonhoeffer, who pub-
lished a number of articles on the topic of the war neuroses. In 1941 Richard Huelsenbeck
prepared a list of his "psychiatric internships and residencies," which included the following
information: "Berlin Charite/Professor Bonhoeffer 1923/25, assistant psychiatrist" (Welt-
dada Huelsenbeck, p. 202). The secondary literature on madness and modern art is enor-
mous, and I shall not attempt to catalogue it here. On the interest of early twentieth-century
German psychiatrists in the art of the insane, and on the related association of modernism
with that art, see Sander L. Gilman, Difference and Pathology: Stereotypes of Sexuality, Race, and
Madness (Ithaca, N.Y., 1985), pp. 217-38.
MELIORISMlUS
eet antabcd md die Ziditar smwind gerwucgern, ndl
eri t it ut ime Roll ortumemet, die nachd den PliiUe
des elItftwliec Itlhcecs od ode r Lelit btdeuten k.d;i.
ts st ei ausied deci Egrregvmg, witMc memad dhe
vorclle e fieelef Etcne te ancetdeele wibnhiniaigli bireett lier ist der Lcehcsi: cWedl dicse WI. elci., pb.nfll rntrkmr
an rrddu~~~m rl, emM3
bcrr (t~cf-+bm++
drPb~rhlnttthl"
lt n ,t
ldK
an weldtwiwwdicef [ncccii CceceN die Iic4ycliie 1kw ditihatiei iccwii
Art, ine lOiblerltgeninwell wrtrec Iiesle likunil Die dea sie sit h d hl c del n Etmiebunge dws Oles al, geladi lor l de |+m ndmf ks| I~ d ri .+ aIos e dte h ml ignt , d l ad on
ErcigrIlec wlrl ings welde t w i ci.O ed dem lihi. det mug sie ebtisser e werdertl . le mc,t i vcwectl dstl me tl*lumti gelcl. ddSeCA cict cc n l iwen foiiof c
deen Naleui-hlSmacb maees In chi. die ti? di Kdie hic-waic tl
Vcrwussidtueciiden wthiiill sit celcd. dodc d eirbleweruiiwtiitdwg. dc n wm ale
pcht wmdca were, vetwclts e ii u werdee, wenw es idtl mcwl hl t dh i des doedd e dcc lmclthdeirwl uwd iGc- adeer ceem Nimen ge tsmtellmnt
clheen und dmcri
mcillhlc t weit. aus t e iet scdlelknW ell te te qlc czu der ltc it
alule et nihre
sectleeh ;ecc Vetlhllcice
Abhigc giiedl dewer Asdaaiie
n ue u cr matild d"tes
d a goOllI'cei haibec Ik~t~r hPJ+
madhen. ware d s L.ebet unnlos ud dae lBetd wderde tgbtck w leai ullcleatglleetmit des ethees mtd cliec Ihuc
tO e . m wn hnge scih iril. L)ie Lictnd, die ccS oetid.
wiahib die lieclldil.t ce wside xe hhatlw, in dCi cs Epwidsec
wle rlnlm citwed
ledecsedin d Atbie ld rr e ,ic it lW.lwllce
wwceneditlllcii-rc ileidecci|llur#.
Mdklefi dQit. arl dcc
t . Ldlctac dc )hiee
lleeliciu d. c
D[ie tllig LPiId. di dli N,'ew cille Zd TI hM. ihoheretr ilced iedeetd ce [iviigkelI tgetcbet hd a d duid wend ci: t&A Vitgucc Icclewace I w-lw eiseett Ike ci itcer r c i, lr S aeC ftoe iclIt-etle.
cli dws gleincslee lUtensil de r Zedi. em wahhmll dlate- ub cstiht sit. ic, dt Cdi fldlnieieck ailecs Oedithetcn bEcseelle r d det e ecgt-lic wcm MUcMcci tlplt .t . di Iat.rigli bedcu.e l ie i cmc
iimeclie M ltfirecine masiwielle Eeoouicic Ice[lTud i dF t'e.ll die.teien elubjieen eld. Waet will mian
der hwl. kiwc nlemniwd int Alge theen 'Ivirklcd i ldepw
leri wVebesiceti? [Feiheif ofl ci ewe rt des rfftt Sim d4 i Wclikdmk el i dec Icie uod dumdweewe Mi |etsc - die- hr e dc Ir ewoauer ewe A ktij cci ihalirdi ear i mcd
%irmts eurde hlilti oitr eIt doll w Id ldl fidt hot, wecnn man .c- w drm te Tlew dec Persncldhtell ibe .nge .dt .r - d t.w . .. d c ltlci d . ili cwd .r liecici~.c. 1 ip t 1iie . . . d
_ cce ic-S, Mectili, d, ldi c Ie ric d, icic m eie 14 .bstic e tsmntc t , e i btrs ore r c Cic llr.it tlcc.mg
iermltmtits wid sbhei sle n 61lW TmrllXr d Ineit dOllm ticl y dlc
tjehl Itwcrewcccsescleci. .dwldetdtwngene. .len, pild1 Cm<cc etl ,(Itsiseiorc I.e trmicech wed w. dci, dcc Erwart
Menscl dci Well iwe drk undtd veidt die tP tl:delhiim ht.ie Alelfecec tind de i&all uIed IPlu*. ci essi die Muacer Ndtwerlle der -uadciht:esi |hlew i ccis tnt-ctos r-* ,111
1 l?n+q Emsctl , "hoewgowullgr hat dct eideesi uantl daes r[e ll in des Andtie euuk. lFtlh, i, ce ic tn Wart, dc l ureric l ri e : dci Il .el e
mic wliiwed., de in ctine twid Iril weeltill werdr. at die Widikllicid d , *ccl dc i, Pdic:iheliOcie
eclidedl idflo
wlit ihdcl. w dice.
eii edbliwcedecl Mwltl*-
iowLeiiie 9t4c 1 Sircirtihat.
[eleiet. IMdied ecrljcwcetahc ie Itr ccc c
ie ist tliahlm iend mieill. II tidwe. tld dc eelccewteace cc p'iiicteet die ticiecm
Peili (etdeehen uili ncehl ein ciei
..., etA iciclS e ci t li, ,ii.i rit
e*1rllLn~e-, oan rlr mnn +se+|, w n1.o ,,+++,+r
ihcihl-dl, dwuite deiste Ir tbltn iled(t
ite l- ithet Ilestcls rfkantfw lil ie-
cer,;+,lie ,al
Se.
Du ee dcciwi we.
dec. ihlic.iii..
f, ccicOictlccici
c lit
wed .......... ;kc
drciii. blagoweat.
bhng cf
iih, 'Se erLeCill., di h ldtirt id dctl
.l/ilPs++b e nsr den Vilrlulf dr: E :.s, a-I tutiet lelec i t c t ; c! dii" i
ri lie, jwccde. hindi i m ut trl ti'sii I ell. tits lis g wrfe r wel-rla[Iill~
14tr ~,<deicAli
rrl . u?++t l rm ,,tIdr tl ?Z n te
l.
ittU~l~lwccitee:C. ccl~lll~fYii i~ciij
aimcil i llli. - 0i l2wii dtll tl' etil-
,ditrn molw de> lti dicc +weAlcs ril nab~ at,,% 6rhccmpndpzal Irgihmlll*ri W. 'i. o"'l hrr
iwwcr ec
Mmrnner I1idet.
iblldel+, drt:rtdie dieAisl,
bTlrl ia
&rgmJLgklt skci
Srli c .citit, ,laiwee, t.wec imi dcd
it<le wwldcw Ilte. k iilctil uwcl
....
seikeD. Dich
..... a..n E....t.als
in die AbtrIrriift
cnis. ver-
,gii i r c d wn uedn d?vtcitwsree.
t o lls t e n W a h n in n $ . 4 . l... . . . . . r %. - d 4,
cI, i'cctc- j elEll wwii nliiwl-lt
?ilt doral 04-13kh Net Nlrkbr f'Oldlr rm~i W"All VOP dtf M i~
dewt wil C rtcie vt,111-mmest - c rcii uele 00
< >o+,I; fui ert' lfictieicieiilice.i1 'htl b< tiqrrn bilden Mi de i ici
toisenWaosins.teccc c
criuc tl , ccicecs uvdwih nr eiw tw .wl, , dIc V i mI
Oive neumn nc ecls ASec -ld. 8r T* Z1. S
Ist. keie duichis nug dieeAb gm4 n daive Q'ieksv.
M o i r I s n a
btago bung is (ieselrern. dice unt o em U lntewi weiii tielwtC mtiecr
hll0c ibref k eelh i c l7 i wle rtw cs dhhtbli. w
crc, e itr cl i d itiin Ttele .Icii tugeelie S
ertgl si, lu bild. di ci iwe, c die im irwde ncil
htclci wid n:di tmwlcltelft wlett. w19 Sir tes Ste ihctli lrwhtcl. hrc, wale , wma lc agedeutelc. it
cltill it ihicci Anwuwi. dwcab OCeimthwen nidil, ledivil- tragdcmd Ctccak cdhr dci cl crfhllf kit di
cirheijde det Miabl. i ttede Ifwew kMit , I
d 1en lletin ian, ghalud ewe VetelacuMg ued &esl Men Tielciac Mlsdcdit, d c ts wi ed smach empflnde, cil
cnnl sde Aclhete. die deli KcIold" des kuletlivccltd-n tp*" lfu fmu - es tPI dw Akr~lvdal Flafi*"
dJi ltdwlalen [iee des Pacletnamcsc awl d t Tribuat cu
slelfcn. leaicbli. dicee cs imtale verlendem hwbee. Seltimmew vion Akfivifkll. em blassraI Abbsdef
cidis MatM vM i merds ile:h Ma.1cd umsi46l1 hn11We mch C Mr.
ENT PEINTE icicidkm licillcec ad Zcii t ci e ahrend . wtO ks
um nut ,diedes e.ic mi 4n d ie ditelfo hi e PsQorF1mw1
Aitdiwdtf ted dcir dcii eli(cfcliec Iwdic wed lilddl cidi vesIll we wel tie deW t itt iww tln tr c thelnl
isl. ., ec, de 5hinde gkctmnt. wemn nutw e u w olen M- Soidlen Mltteln an dce VcTt:ccsrtuew dei Wel gRehe,
,eutiht, sii die Wtl rue titcrc rn cil ets man glubl in Hilnficsluben uther Rerlt.n "u debOtleltcm, i klcewem
cmap mu?ewe dse Well'tcer cd, dtc Well, die S e it, h 04ioled tiillchitl. i.icdltct man dc[ Stze. ideabicltde Pchllk vu
nc+it i.urbwdedf hat i d ncc dei creeccnh4enlVi lwka dei mweicen, des tat cits wdlli c ri die Wtk c i o idwctltcr-
IlIddti und lunisteti nhiir c dei wereger ijcllc-igkidec lccptgtiee cicieecen.
FIG. 3.-John Heartfield(?), two pages from the unpublished project, Dadaco, dadaistis
Zeitschriften (Hamburg, 1984), n. p. C 1997 Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York/VG Bil
17. George Grosz, "Kaffeehaus," Neue Bldtterfiir Kunst und Dichtung 1 (Nov. 1918): 155;
rpt. in Grosz, Grosz-Berlin: Autobiographisches, Bilder, Briefe, und Gedichte, ed. Marcel Beyer and
Karl Riha (Hamburg, 1993), p. 59; reproduced by permission of the Estate of George Grosz,
Princeton, N.J.
18. On the difficulty of dating the poem, see Beth Irwin Lewis, George Grosz: Art and
Politics in the Weimar Republic (1971; Princeton, N.J., 1991), p. 35.
19. Grosz, letter to Otto Schmalhausen, 15 Mar. 1917, Briefe: 1913-1959, ed. Herbert
Knust (Hamburg, 1979), p. 48. The letter was written from the "Nervenheilanstalt G6rden."
Many questions regarding Grosz's war service remain unanswered for lack of consistent
information. In what follows I sketch certain facts and related suppositions that seem to
me relatively certain. Grosz enlisted on 11 November 1914. The draft apparently seemed
unavoidable to Grosz, and he may have thought that by volunteering he would be able to
exercise a certain amount of choice in postings. In any case, rather than going into combat,
Grosz spent a considerable period during the winter of 1914-15 in a Lazarett, initially due
to a serious sinus infection. He was released as unfit for service in May 1915. Grosz was
called up again on 4 January 1917, and on 5 January was once again hospitalized, this time
apparently without any physical ailment at all. He spent January through April in mental
hospitals, first in Guben and then in Gbrden, both in the Brandenburg region not too far
from Berlin.
It has been suggested that the eminent sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld provided an
evaluation of Grosz's mental state that led to the young artist's final discharge. Should that
be true, it would be a matter of some interest where my interpretation of Grosz's representa-
tion of male sexuality and traumatic shock is concerned. First recounted by Grosz's biogra-
pher, Lothar Fischer, the suggestion of Hirschfeld's involvement in Grosz's discharge is
based on information obtained from Grosz's eldest son, Peter M. Grosz of Princeton, New
Jersey. In his autobiography, Grosz asserted that Count Harry Kessler had played a role in
his discharge, and made no mention of Hirschfeld. Recently published archival documents
support the claim for Kessler's involvement, insofar as they reveal that Grosz, Heartfield,
and Wieland Herzfelde all would seem to have been exempted from further military duty
in 1917 when they went to work making animated military propaganda films for the Bild-
und Film-Amt (Bufa), an endeavor endorsed and partially arranged by Kessler. On the
future dadaists' work at Bufa, see Jeanpaul Goergen, "Marke Herzfeld-Filme: Dokumente
zu John Heartfields Film-Arbeit," in John Heartfield: Dokumentation: Reaktionen auf eine unge-
wohnliche Ausstellung, ed. Klaus Honnef and Hans-Jilrgen von Osterhausen (Cologne, 1994),
pp. 23-66 and "'Filmisch sei der Strich, klar, einfach': George Grosz und der Film," in
George Grosz: Berlin-New York, ed. Peter-Klaus Schuster (exhibition catalogue, Neue Na-
tionalgalerie, Berlin, 21 Dec. 1994-17 Apr. 1995), pp. 211-18. Regarding Magnus Hirsch-
feld's possible involvement in Grosz's case, I should like to mention that Hirschfeld was not
an uncommon name in Berlin in 1917 and that there was indeed a Dr. Richard Hirschfeld
who treated war neurotics at the Charlottenburg Kriegslazarett in Berlin during World War
I-perhaps the latter was Grosz's evaluator and perhaps it is for that reason we find no
mention of the much more famous Dr. Magnus Hirschfeld in Grosz's own reminiscences.
On his first period of military service, see Grosz, Ein kleinesJa und ein grofes Nein: Sein
Leben von ihm selbst erzdhlt (1955; Hamburg, 1986), p. 102, where Grosz himself suggests that
the account of his war experience provided by his art is the more complete and compelling
one: "I could write page after page about [World War I], but everything I could say about
it is already in my drawings." The 1917 hospitalization is described on pp. 110-14. On
Grosz's military service, see also Lewis, George Grosz, pp. 23, 51, and Lothar Fischer and
Helen Adkins, George Grosz (1976; Hamburg, 1993), p. 35.
In the hope of being able to describe in greater detail the circumstances of Grosz's
military service, in 1994 I attempted to gain access to Grosz's military medical records,
which are in the files of the Krankenbuchlager, Berlin. Unfortunately, access was denied, as
was the confirmation or denial of currently published information regarding materials said
to be contained in the records. For their support of my efforts, which included an appeal
to the city government of Berlin (Senat) in which their assistance was invaluable, I thank
Martin Kohli and Ingeborg Mehser of the Berlin Program for Advanced German and Euro-
pean Studies, Freie UniversitAt, Berlin. Some correspondence between Peter Grosz and the
Krankenbuchlager is among the Grosz Papers at the Houghton Library, Harvard Univer-
sity, but that correspondence does not contain any information relevant to my concerns.
For related information obtained from my own correspondence with Mr. Grosz, see note 46.
20. Grosz, "Kaffeehaus," pp. 59-60.
The poem describes the experience of a man returned from military ser-
vice to metropolitan Berlin, a figure like the one in Grosz's The Love-Sick
Man (Der Liebeskranke) (fig. 4), an oil on canvas of 1916, or in his The Post-
operative Man (Der operierte Mann) (fig. 5), a pencil drawing from a note-
book Grosz kept while hospitalized for the treatment of persistent, raging
sinus infections during his first stint of military duty in 1915.
In the caf6 of Grosz's poem, a man becomes a child, the world a
collection of amusement parks, a Coney Island of the mind. The caf6 is
transformed before the man's eyes, its furnishings seen through colored
filters of twisting film. Objects are altered by an addled self. Set in motion,
tables stroll and visit the spaces between women's legs and inside their
blouses, around their breasts. (In terms of sound as well as space, the
tables have not far to travel from weifen Blusen to weif en Busen.) A table
just keeps spinning, and its solid marble-once painted briskly circular
in The Love-Sick Man-changes not only shape but substance: what was
geometric, thick and hard, all mineral, becomes a fragile mix of animal
and mineral-"circles become eggs." A once-firm slab of rock becomes a
thing to be shattered.
The shocks of the trenches are simulated by the shocks of the me-
tropolis. The musical notes of a caf6 band are now projectiles penetrating
a vulnerable brain: "Und Noten werfen wie Schrotschiisse kleine Locher
in mein Gehirn." The man becomes a machine whose pressure gauge no
longer functions: "Ich bin eine Maschine, an der der Manometer entzwei
ist." And the words Grosz chooses to describe the machine's breaking are
the same as those he chose for his own damaged nerves a few months
earlier, when he wrote: "meine Nerven gingen entzwei." Tables, eggs,
pressure gauges, nerves: they all go to pieces. Now meterless, and thus
unregulated, the man-machine operates in perpetual repetitive motion.
"And all the cylinders run in a circle - / See: we are all neurasthenics!"
The speaker is an intoxicated poet at a caf6 table, shifting his gaze
and setting down lines at a pace that can be traced in the poem's orthog-
raphy, full of dashes and multiple exclamation points, and in its agitated
verbs: things get thrown, undergo sudden transformation, spin, wander,
and roll (kurbeln) like a movie projector. When addressing the reader, the
poet's speech is urgent and blunt. He announces what must be seen. He
says at last what all the previous lines, vivid with color and matter and
sound overwhelming the senses, have been sputtering and toppling to-
ward: a diagnosis of universal neurasthenia. A relation is established be-
tween an engine spinning unmonitored-an apparatus always at work
but without apparent purpose, at risk of overheating or otherwise ceasing
to function-and the condition of neurasthenia. The poem ends with
ili'??~li?
~.?::??
~:~~i~ae:s
/i
~.
:?::
~sirliii; 2? ~ A
?,??:,~
..i?
IC> t ;
4k?
j ,, vs
?:?:r?
WI!F':'iit:?.: ?? ?'':li':ll
FIG. 4.-George Grosz, The Love-Sick Man, 1916. Oil on can- FIG. 5.-Georg
vas. 100 x 78 cm. Kunstsammlung Nordrhein-Westfalen, Diissel- 1915. Pencil. Gr
dorf. ? Estate of George Grosz, Princeton, N.J./Licensed by VAGA, 1915), p. 25. 16.2
New York, NY. demie der Kiins
graph courtesy
? Estate of Georg
VAGA, New York
21. In Berlin Dada Montage I argue that the poem sustains two notions of neurasthenia
as a universal condition, the first being the illustrative conception discussed above, and the
second notion being a performative one that invites the reader to participate in an experi-
ence of neurasthenia, an experience conceived as immanent to the reading of the poem.
Regarding the line "See: we are all neurasthenics!" compare the language of Ferenczi's clinical
descriptions of war neurotics; see nn. 7, 60, 63. On the clinical gaze, see Michel Foucault,
The Birth of the Clinic: An Archaeology of Medical Perception, trans. A. M. Sheridan Smith (1963;
New York, 1975). On the history of neurasthenia and its relation to modernity and to work,
see Anson Rabinbach, The Human Motor: Energy, Fatigue, and the Origins of Modernity (Berke-
ley, 1992).
.o .,* ?p k ....
r? ..,,?
... .,.,.. .*..?
.,..,+
S.. ?d' , . .
~' "3".:"... ...
i ~ ~ . :i!!".. ...
''"i > ?l
? ~ ~ ? i."./ ."-..
L1BERTE. EGA.lIT. FRATERNIMt LIGHT iUNO LUFTi OM PROLETARIAT THE WORKMANI 4UMAY
FIG. 6.-George Grosz, Licht und Luft dem Proletariat-Libert&, Egaliti, Fraterni
Workman's Holiday, 1919/1920. Lithograph. 48 x 39 cm. Grosz, Gott mit uns (Berlin
p. 4. Berlinische Galerie, Landesmuseum fiir Moderne Kunst, Photographie und
tektur, Berlin. ? Estate of George Grosz, Princeton, N.J./Licensed by VAGA, New Yor
iat (fig. 6). The title, which mocks the mottoes of contemporary ho
reform movements, can be translated as "Natural Light and Fresh A
the Proletariat." Licht und Luft dem Proletariat was published as pa
Grosz's 1920 portfolio, Gott mit uns, and was exhibited that year
Dada Fair.22 When the poem's machine parts turn and repeat, I am
22. When published by the Malik Verlag in 1920, the picture bore the caption
ert&, Egalite, Fraternit--Licht und Luft dem Proletariat-The Workman's Holid
From the portfolio "Gott mit uns": 'Licht und Luft dem Proletariat!'
Penitentiary-mechanics. A hard, durable circle [durer Kranz] of ma-
chine-men, between electrodes of tyrannical military mustaches.
Walls, high, higher. Way up high, the narrowest glimpse into the false
freedom of a smoke-filled sky. Three times three porthole-style,
barred windows on the right-angled walls. Bleakly the human carou-
sel [Menschenkarussell] turns and turns. The hands are shackled be-
hind the back, and binding fetters force their way into limbs and
gazes.24
Grosz, Gott mit uns (Berlin, 1920), p. 4. The phrase "Gott mit uns" means "God with us" and
was a German military slogan during World War I. The portrayal of the military in Gott mit
Uns was one of the centerpieces of the charges of "slandering the military" (Beleidigung der
Reichswehr) on which Grosz and the other dadaists were tried. Copies of the portfolio were
set out on a display table at the Dada Fair, where visitors could leaf through the nine prints.
In 1921, Licht und Luft dem Proletariat was published with the expanded title Arbeitersanato-
rium: Licht und Luft dem Proletariat. Also compare a 1919 drawing by Grosz, Maifeier in Pl6t-
zensee, which depicts pacing prisoners, incarcerated for revolutionary activity. See
Alexander Diickers, George Grosz: Das druckgraphische Werk/The Graphic Work, trans. Steven
Connell (San Francisco, 1996), p. 192. Grosz revived the composition of Licht und Luft dem
Proletariat in his stage design for Erwin Piscator's 1926 Berlin production of Das trunkene
Schiff Eine szenische Ballade, Paul Zech's theatrical adaptation of Arthur Rimbaud's Le Ba-
teau ivre.
23. Following Duickers, Neugebauer makes the comparison to Van Gogh in George
Grosz, p. 61. For a discussion of issues related to the conflation of prison and military mental
hospital I describe here, see Foucault, Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, trans. Alan
Sheridan (1975; New York, 1979), pp. 135-69.
24. Mynona [Salomo Friedlinder], George Grosz (Dresden, 1922), p. 21.
motion also resonates with the language of"Kaffeehaus," where the man
is a child and the world is an amusement park. (I shall return in a subse-
quent section to the image of "electrodes of tyrannical military mus-
taches.")
The subject of Licht und Luft dem Proletariat is nominally the proletar-
iat incarcerated (witness the smoking chimney and the filthy sky beyond
the high prison walls), but the image, I think, conflates those two scenes
I named above; this is a prison, but it is also a military madhouse, where
the shared experience of mental illness might take the social form of pac-
ing together in a circle. Indeed, the overseers are not prison guards, but
Prussian officers, the "tyrannical military mustaches" of Friedlinder's
synecdoche.
And if the men's suits underscore the similarities between workers'
coveralls and the standard-issue cotton garb of inmates, they also resem-
ble the outfits of shell-shocked convalescents, which themselves resemble
or may even have been a version of the soldiers' military uniforms. Com-
pare a photograph published in a Berlin psychiatric journal in 1918
(fig. 7), where the soldier-patients at a wartime mental hospital take in-
struction in singing.25 Some of the men, we know from the text of the
article, have only recently recovered the faculty of speech, having been
rendered psychogenically mute by the traumatic shock of their war expe-
rience. In another photograph from the same article (fig. 8), patients-a
few with visible head injuries, others with purely psychic dysfunctions-
practice language exercises while doctors in officers' uniforms observe,
displaying in costume and posture the authority of their medical and
military roles.26 The uniforms stand out in what otherwise might appear
to be just a cheery hospital common room, complete with checkered
tablecloths and tropical plants in wicker baskets to make the convales-
cents feel at home.
I have said that Grosz's lithograph, Licht und Luft dem Proletariat, con-
flates factory, prison, and mental hospital. The collapse of factory into
prison is presented by Grosz with straightforward irony, announcing that
the only natural light and fresh air the proletariat has access to in Ger-
many in 1920 are that of the penitentiary's exercise yard. That is the
bitter joke of the picture and its caption. But it is the other conflation,
25. The image is captioned "Gesangstunden," and appears in Fritz Hartmann, "Die
K.K. Nervenklinik Graz im Dienste des Krieges," Archiv fiir Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten
59, no. 2-3 (1918): 1162-1258. See figure 31, p. 1190.
26. The image is captioned "Schulstunden mit Sprachkranken und anderen Gehirn-
verletzten." See figure 14 in Hartmann, "Die K.K. Nervenklinik Graz im Dienste des
Krieges," p. 1181. At the Graz clinic, patients were not separated according to whether they
were being rehabilitated for a return to military service, or for civilian work, and those with
organic disorders were treated along with those with functional disorders. See Hartmann,
"Die K.K. Nervenklinik Graz im Dienste des Krieges," pp. 1250-56.
. ...............
pax -, .. ......
.. ... ... .. .. ...
FIG. 7.-"
Dienste de
William H
'nr . i. B~.. ?....... ... .. ?:; .. ............... . . .. ......... :i;; )!:....... ........... j i.. .. i : ..
?:
?+ :":':::
.:.. ..?: r:
?B E . :. ."
'*"'; ?;;i -
?'U "
:.....:??: ? .::
:.2 l ............ . .... . . ...... .
? ....
the one that brings together prison and military mental hospital, which I
should like now to pursue.27
27. In Berlin Dada Montage I analyze the identification of the (revolutionary) proletar-
iat with the traumatic neurotics of World War I as that identification was framed in dada
and in the clinical literature on the war neuroses. For a discussion of the employment of
war neurotics in factories during World War I, see Lerner, "Rationalizing the Therapeutic
Arsenal," pp. 134-37.
28. See Wieland Herzfelde,John Heartfield: Leben und Werk (Dresden, 1962), pp. 16-17.
In radio and print interviews during the 1950s and 1960s, Heartfield discussed his defiant
attitude towards military authority during the war; but, to my knowledge, he never men-
tioned a hospitalization for mental or other illnesses. See John Heartfield, Lebenslaufe and
transcripts of Rundfunk-Gesprdche, John Heartfield Archive, Akademie der Kiinste zu Berlin.
29. Herzfelde, John Heartfield, p. 18.
R.?F
... . .. .. 61
....... . ..
...........
...... .. .. ?? ? ?:
. . .i: ..... ..
Ivy ;3 ;?xe
' ::?. .. i ... .... .. ..??
. . . . . . . .. ...
.... ........
. ...... ....ii??:.r
..... ..........
........ ......
M r :??: ???
FIG. 9.--George Grosz, "The Convict": Monteur John Heartfield after Franz Jung's A
tempt to Get Him Up on His Feet, 1920. Watercolor and photomontage. 41.9 x 30.5 cm. G
of A. Conger Goodyear. The Museum of Modern Art, New York. ? Estate of Geo
Grosz, Princeton, N.J./Licensed by VAGA, New York, NY.
30. I thank Dawn Ades for calling my attention to the resemblance to Grosz.
"We see a deformed body," wrote Herzfelde in the entry for Monteur
John Heartfield in the catalogue to the Dada Fair, "a body whose forms
bespeak uncommon reserves of energy, which swell up in every direction
against those indifferent walls." "Beyond that," he continues, "the unique
and material reflexes: the intimate knowledge of the machine ... and
the obsession with good food and freedom, symbolized by the new home
dangling above him, which incorporates a delicatessen."35 In that brief
description of the montage, Herzfelde approximated certain clinical de-
scriptions of the war neurotics of the First World War. To cite one brief
example, an American psychoanalyst who worked extensively with World
War I veterans suffering from traumatic neuroses described one of his
patients in terms that apply with striking accuracy to the monteur Heart-
field: "His behavior was very rigid. He would look out of the corner of
his eyes rather than turn his face. He hardly looked around the room to
notice any of the objects in it."36
Closer in time and place to Berlin dada we find the following de-
scription of a war neurotic, which comes from a paper that was presented
by the Hungarian psychoanalyst Saindor Ferenczi at a 1918 conference in
Budapest on the war neuroses. Published in Germany the following year,
Ferenczi's paper provides a description that anticipates Herzfelde's refer-
33. Herzfelde, "The Curious Merchant from Holland," Harper's 187 (Nov. 1943): 481.
34. Grosz, A Little Yes and a Big No: The Autobiography of George Grosz, trans. Lola Sachs
Dorin (New York, 1946), p. 146. Grosz's autobiography was written (in German) in exile in
New York during the Second World War. This quotation in English is from the original
American edition, which Grosz helped to prepare.
35. Herzfelde, "Zur Einftihrung," Katalog der Ersten Internationalen Dada-Messe (Berlin,
1920), n. p. The figure of "home" in dada montage and its relation to domestic interiors in
the plays of Bertolt Brecht and Georg Kaiser are discussed in my Berlin Dada Montage.
36. Abraham Kardiner, "The Bio-Analysis of the Epileptic Reaction," Psychoanalytic
Quarterly 1 (1932): 398; cited in Leys, "Death Masks," p. 62.
37. Freud, "Dr. S&ndor Ferenczi (on his 50th Birthday)," Standard Edition, 19:269. See
also Freud, "Dr. Sindor Ferenczi (Zum 50. Geburtstag)," Gesammelte Werke, ed. Anna Freud
et al., 17 vols. (London, 1940-52), 13:445. For a comprehensive analysis of Ferenczi's theo-
ries of trauma, see Leys, "Death Masks."
38. Ferenczi, among others, described the disruptions of posture, gait, and speech
observed in war neurotics in terms of a regression to an infantile stage of development. See
PWN, pp. 15-16, as well as the following passage from his earlier paper on the war neu-
roses:
The result of such a psychic shock may quite well have been a neurotic re
is, the relapse into a phylo- and ontogenetic stage of development long
Now the stage to which these two neurotics regressed seems to be the i
of the first year of life, a time when they could not yet either walk or st
We know that this stage has a phylogenetic model; the upright gait bei
fairly late achievement of our ancestors among the mammalia. [Ferencz
of War Neuroses" (1916-17), Further Contributions to the Theory and Techniq
Analysis, pp. 136-37; hereafter abbreviated "T T"]
. :iil: !
. ...........
? ...;: ? ?;
FAA:,
:X'
.. ,:.....
% . .. .... .....I
H-4i.
?2 " .:.i
S::z.
....
: R .I? ?: ??
BRITISH AIRWAYS
(glued there like a postage stamp); where floor meets rear wall in a shard
of brown on black, a woman, also glued on, is naked at least to her belly
button and cut off just below it; and, finally, an absurdly long-waisted
man in a frock coat and top hat is striding towards the door while turning
his montaged double head to look at the naked woman at the back of the
room (one of the man's heads is watercolor, round, brown, and stubbly
like that of the other man in the room, and like that of the monteur
Heartfield; the other head is a near three-quarter view from the back,
showing a light-colored collar, thick crop of glossy hair, and well-trimmed
beard). In the picture that stands for "outside the window," a column
emerges like a phallus from a dark mass of leafy treetops.
As I see it, this is another picture of a man at once adult and child.
It is dada's version of a war neurotic's regressive fantasy, delivered up in
4t. xtE. :I
TV4
........
ee I:
xe
... .......
FIG. I 1.-George
Schere: Sieben M
Licensed by VAG
40. Max Osborn, "Dada," Vossische Zeitung (Berlin), 17 July 1920, [p. 12].
41. It is worth mentioning in regard to these lines, that the German word Schreck as it
appears in the materials addressed in the present essay has been variously translated as
"fright," "terror," or "shock." In the interest of consistency and because I believe it brings
us closer to the idiom of Berlin dada in 1920, I have for the most part translated Schreck as
shock. Consider the term Schreckneurose frequently used by both Ferenczi and Freud as a
synonym for traumatische Neurose. I have followed the original 1921 translation of Ferenczi's
phrase, eine kleine Schreck- (oder traumatische) Neurose, as "a little shock (or traumatic) neuro-
sis," which differs from Strachey's 1955 translation of Freud's Schreckneurose as "fright-
neurosis" in Beyond the Pleasure Principle, as it does from C. J. M. Hubback's 1922 translation
of Freud's text, which reserves the term "shock neurosis" for Unfallsneurose, the latter trans-
lated by Strachey in that instance as "traumatic neurosis." See Freud, Beyond the Pleasure
Principle, pp. 12-14, Jenseits des Lustprinzips, rev. ed. (Vienna, 1921), pp. 9-10, and Beyond the
Pleasure Principle, trans. C. J. M. Hubback (London, 1922), pp. 9-10. Questions of definition
and translation concerning the term Schreck demand more consideration than I can give
them here. On the psychoanalytic definitions of "fright" (Schreck) and "traumatic neurosis"
(traumatische Neurose), see Jean Laplanche and J.-B. Pontalis, The Language of Psycho-analysis,
trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith (New York, 1973), pp. 174-75, 470-73.
42. On the consequences of shell shock for male sexuality in World War I, see Leed,
No Man's Land, pp. 183-86; Elaine Showalter, The Female Malady: Women, Madness, and English
Culture, 1930-1980 (New York, 1985), pp. 167-94 and "Rivers and Sassoon: The Inscription
of Male Gender Anxieties"; and Sandra M. Gilbert, "Soldier's Heart: Literary Men, Literary
Women, and the Great War," in Behind the Lines: Gender and the Two World Wars, ed. Margaret
Randolph Higonnet et al. (New Haven, Conn., 1987), pp. 61-69, 197-226.
meanor, but in the physical stuff of the body, in flesh gone baby soft, in
hands and genitals shrunk to childlike shapes and sizes. The short answer
to the question of whether the body we see is straightforwardly that of a
man regressed would have to be yes, but only partly. That the body and
the temperament of the monteur have returned to a very childish state
seems clear enough. But the disruption of the monteur's imagined sexual-
ity involves something more than libidinal injury figured in a little penis.
As though the bodily return to enraged infancy were not enough, Grosz's
depiction of the monteur Heartfield involves not just regression, but
transformation and disorganization, a thorough unsettling of sexual
identity. Perhaps the reduction of genital potency and the corresponding
regression into infantile narcissism that Ferenczi describes in his 1918
paper on the war neuroses are not the only explanations for the unusual
small double bulge between Heartfield's columnar thighs. Perhaps what
we see is labia stretching the fabric of the monteur's suit.
We can find agitation and confusion at the crotch of each one of
Grosz's male figures we have looked at thus far. About The Love-Sick Man
there is a certain transparency, with the contour of an organ drawn with
the brush, but never fully painted in with pigment. Beneath and around
the sketched penis we find the now familiar double bulge. Rendered here
in two quick strokes of deep mossy green, it means to say just testicles, but
seems somehow forced, or insecure, as though the area had been re-
turned to at painting's end with a gesture that moved fast, but fell short
of the nonchalance it was meant to demonstrate. And The Postoperative
Man? Well, just that, to put it bluntly: something has been removed; if
not surgically altered, then erased in sketching. Among Grosz's fragmen-
tary notes in the 1915 sketchbook where this drawing appears are these:
"That I hate myself" (Dafi ich mich hasse); and "I can love no woman" (Ich
kann keine Frau lieben).43 In the sketch, we can just barely discern a looping
line for testicles. Grosz's hand is cartooning here, and the scrotum's bulge
is comical, with an energized horizontal swell that at once undercuts and
emphasizes the violence in the overlay of lines that make the balls all but
invisible. Nothing is left of a penis except its covering over in rapid pencil,
stabbing and pressing-and then that little kitty-whiskered button-up
pump, a perfect fetish for this draughtsmanly castration, adding insult
to injury, with bitter, self-ironizing fun.
44. As Leys establishes through her reading of Ferenczi and Kardiner, the traumatic
event involves what she calls an "affective identification" on the part of the subject of
trauma. On this tendency of the subject of trauma to identify with the "aggressor" in the
traumatic scene, see Leys, "Death Masks," p. 60; and Leys, "The Real Miss Beauchamp:
Gender and the Subject of Imitation," in Feminists Theorize the Political, ed. Judith Butler and
Joan W. Scott (New York, 1992), pp. 167-214. On the concept of mimetic identification, see
Mikkel Borch-Jacobsen, The Freudian Subject, trans. Catherine Porter (Stanford, Calif., 1988).
45. E Kehrer, "Psychogene Storungen des Auges und des Gehors," Archiv fiir Psychia-
trie und Nervenkrankheiten 58 (1917): 401-532. See figure 1, p. 428. On German military
psychiatry, see Peter Riedesser and Axel Verderber, "Maschinengewehre hinter der Front" Zur
Geschichte der deutschen Militirpsychiatrie (Frankfurt am Main, 1996), and Karl Heinz Roth,
"Die Modernisierung der Folter in den beiden Weltkriegen: Der Konflikt der Psychothera-
peuten und Schulpsychiater um die deutschen 'Kriegsneurotiker' 1915-1945," 1999 2 (July
1987): 8-75.
46. At the military mental hospital (Nervenheilanstalt G6rden) where Grosz stayed for
more than four months in 1917, so-called electrotherapy was used extensively in the treat-
ment of war neurotics. Although we know it was in Berlin, we do not know to which hospital
Heartfield was sent, but based on the popularity of electrotherapy at the time Heartfield
was hospitalized, it is likely that he, too, would have seen patients there on whom electricity
had been used. One wonders what Grosz, Heartfield, and the other Berlin dadaists might
have known about the war neurotics who were hospitalized in a Kriegslazarett in the Kunst-
gewerbemuseum in Berlin; that place must truly have been, in Ferenczi's words, a "museum
of glaring hysterical symptoms"; see note 7.
Having been denied access to Grosz's military medical records at the Krankenbuch-
lager in Berlin (see note 19), I contacted Peter Grosz, who himself had looked into the
47. The phrase is a translation of Ferenczi's term suggestive Elektrisierung. See Ferenczi,
"Die Psychoanalyse der Kriegsneurosen," in Ferenczi et al., Zur Psychoanalyse der Kriegsneuro-
sen, p. 21. On the "success" achieved with electrotherapy, see Freud, "Memorandum on the
Electrical Treatment of War Neurotics" (1920), Standard Edition, 17:213-14.
48. On the perceived importance of the specifically militaristic disciplinary aspect of
treatment, and of the authoritarian personality of the doctor to the cure of war neurotics in
Germany during and immediately after World War I, see Erwin Loewy-Hattendorf, "Krieg,
Revolution, und Unfallneurosen," Veroffentlichungen aus dem Gebiete der Medizinalverwaltung
11, no. 4 (1920); Kurt Goldstein, "(Jber die Behandlung der Kriegshysteriker," Medizinische
Klinik: Wochenschriftfiir Praktische Arzte 13, no. 28 (15 July 1917): 752-54; Willy Hellpach,
"Lazarettdisziplin als Heilfaktor," Medizinische Klinik: Wochenschriftfiir Praktische Arzte 11, no.
44 (31 Oct. 1915): 1207-11; and Kurt Singer, "Das Kriegsende und die Neurosenfrage,"
Neurologisches Centralblatt 38, no. 9 (May 1919): 330-31 and "Was ist's mit dem Neurotiker
vom Jahre 1920?" Medizinische Klinik: Wochenschrift fiir Praktische Arzte 16, no. 37 (Sept.
1920): 951-53.
49. In "Two Types of War Neuroses," Ferenczi makes a related point when he suggests
that "it is not impossible that the results achieved by many neurologists from treating war
neuroses by painful electrical currents are due to the fact that these painful sensations sat-
Consider another dada object in which the shock of war neurosis and
its treatment are embodied, now materialized in three dimensions. In the
assembled form of Heartfield Gone Wild (fig. 15), the body named as the
dadaist's own is that of a child-sized tailor's dummy to which a number of
objects have been attached: a gun, knife and fork, military medallions,
doorbell, and so forth. As in the pictorial montage MonteurJohn Heartfield,
here "Heartfield"'s body is that of a boy, not a man. And again the trouble
with the genitals. The dadaists take injury and impotence literally once
more, seeing sexuality as genitality and now materializing the wounded
male libido as a glued-on vagina dentata, a chattering plaster bite. Heart-
field Gone Wild has been plugged into an electrical outlet, illuminating his
lightbulb head. From the dummy's trunk emerge one thigh ending in a
delicate mannequin's leg and another fastened to a primitive metal pros-
thesis. Poised peg-legged on a makeshift pedestal, its narrow shoulders
thrown back as though ready for roll call, its chest covered with medals
real and mock, its posterior (invisible to us here) adorned with an Iron
Cross, one shoulder equipped with a revolver, the other with an electric
doorbell, Heartfield Gone Wild is a montage in three dimensions, an assem-
blage of military and mechanical fragments. Notice the rigid, upright,
perpetually standing-at-attention pose, and remember Heartfield, step-
ping forward at roll call to announce himself a war neurotic before an
unsympathetic sergeant. And notice, too, the chalk lines drawn on the
isfy the patients' unconscious traumatophilia [unbewusste Traumatophilie]" ("T T," pp. 140-41;
trans. mod.). Although an adequate examination of the question is beyond the scope of this
essay, it seems to me worth mentioning here that what Ernest Jones in 1922 called the
"analogy of electricity" played an important part in the first English translation of Freud's
Beyond the Pleasure Principle. That translation, by Hubback with revisions by Jones, alter-
nately uses "the words 'investment' or [much more frequently] 'charge', the latter being
taken from the analogy of electricity," as translations of the Freudian Besetzung (Besetzungse-
nergie, Energiebesetzung, Uberbesetzung, and so forth). See Jones, "Editorial Preface," in Beyond
the Pleasure Principle (1922). In the Standard Edition and now elsewhere, Besetzung is usually
translated as "cathexis." See Laplanche and Pontalis, The Language of Psycho-analysis, pp.
62-65.
LOJ .i*.
X;'
I?'?h~i~;l~FII~B~"^~',
:~d?. ~.
~
a: V?
::
P:?;l
:r.l
*. ??f .Y
liir~.?? ??; - ~... -??''?:'~??'
!? f?
;?
i? .r
S
;?? ?i~ .I;:i:~~ae~a~ ~?'. '?. ..::?.???i
k' ::r:
??!
~
dr;31
?::.:~?
~L 1
??9? ~?-
?r?
3:2.
v7
.. .... ....... ..
. ..............
p V, - - ug
Mn
SH
??R MW am,
In
.. ..
VU
.... .. ..
U.M.
,S3 6?o? ..'o m
?
0 5 pn
"Al
. ....... ... ..
zxo
....... .. .. .......
iz 5,
-6
1? M aM
.!e IN?O
?;X
MA:
...... ....
uw.
....... . .......... .
,mn
MrIM n?
ne
M. . .. ..... .... .....
W . w . .. ..........
YN
MW
NMA R
Me N.56W7
5
M
ISORR",
%Wb
0: p
6p " j, 1.
.A V I-P R.
N?:
%57W" ,5
W.,
'nr.7ob.?
..... ...... ..... ....
. .. . .. .........
WIN -,e V.
slate table: might they not be indications of where a soldier was to stand
or step during military exercises? Might they not be traces, inscribed
memories of the dadaists' dread of the Prussian barracks drill?
Beyond the mounted military tools and medals (the revolver, the
mess kit cutlery, the emblazoned regiment numbers, the spread-winged
eagle and the Iron Cross), we find in the figure's electrification another
reference to the war experience, specifically to apparatuses devised for
the wartime treatment of traumatic neuroses. In the absence of illustra-
tions showing the administration of shock with the "electric hands" and
"electric brushes" that were the tools of military psychiatrists, I show you
here another kind of electric medical apparatus employed by the German
military during World War I (fig. 16).5o Proclaiming the dire need on
the part of the war wounded for electric compresses and other warming
devices, this 1916 advertisement-which Grosz and Heartfield would
have known-represents a wounded, electrified man who bears a striking
resemblance to Heartfield Gone Wild. Like Heartfield, the figure in the ad-
vertisement is plugged in and posed on a small platform, which is now
equipped with an electric carpet, one of the apparatuses the ad claims
were in use by the thousands in German and Austro-Hungarian mili-
tary hospitals.
In addition to the administration of electric current as a means of
shocking the soldier-patient out of his neurosis, German military psychia-
trists employed a variety of inventive, if often cruel, mechanized treat-
ments designed to lift psychogenic symptoms with extraordinary speed
and efficiency. At a 1917 conference of German psychiatrists and neurolo-
gists, Dr. Robert Sommer presented a paper describing his method of
curing psychogenic deafness and deaf-muteness among war neurotics.
The treatment employed a so-called Apparatus for the Representation of
the Shock Reaction (Apparat zur Darstellung der Schreck-Reaktion) (fig. 17),
to which the patient was hooked up as follows: his forearm was placed in
a sling, with his hand extended towards the front of the apparatus and
his first and middle fingers secured on a miniature shelf to which a device
resembling an ergograph or pneumograph writer was attached (the
device was then appended to a kymographic tambour that provided
the endless paper surface on which the graphic apparatus's inscriptions
would appear).
The treatment process consisted of the administration of a shock to
rouse the soldier-patient out of his psychogenic state of deafness. While
the patient's attention was still focused on observing the procedures in-
volved in setting up the apparatus to which he had been fastened, the
50. On electricity and medicine, see Michael Hubenstorf, "Vom Krebsgang des
Fortschritts," in Lichtjahre: 100Jahre Strom in Osterreich (exhibition catalogue, Osterreichische
Elektrizititswirtschaft und Gesellschaft Bildender Ktinstler Osterreichs, Vienna, 1986), pp.
149-76. See also Lerner, "Rationalizing the Therapeutic Arsenal," pp. 143-47.
T5
ro sn! unercn
/'
Verwundeten und Kranken
Hitlzngers Elektro- DauerwaIrmer
elektr. Bettwirmer worn K. 15.-
.2
*, WArmekcmpressen ,, , - 8.50
". Heiteoppiche ,, , 25.50 ab,
Heilfufltapparate mit Spiritusheizunq
in jd. rorm
elektr. un. 8cu.a.
Gescbafte .tBe. Pr o. it
Eickrr koIenritd. d, :s San
i wet cr ke . .e' tats-.elr
ali t . r
Wilhelm Hilzinger, Stuttgart B.
rabrtk von crSnuft- unr etcktr schen Htieza;r~r rcn.
i ,ltferant zahrcOt:ctr Kran nei ??scr and Laza:r:c.
Ueber 8000 Hllzlnger-Apparate sind in deutschen a und
8sterrelchlsch- ungarlschen Lazaretten in Verwendung.
"IL
.. .. . .. .
.......
.... ....
L - -------- --------- -
. ... .. ....................
. . ...... .......
........ ....... .. ----- -- - -- - - - 7 .. .......
... .. . .. . . ...
Fitgur 1. App
FIG. 17.-"Apparatus
mer, "Beseitigung fu
tal-psychologische Met
84 (Feb. 1917): 67. Wi
Heartfield Gone Wild has an electric bell on his shoulder. I see him
forever enduring a shocking cure, with the glow of his head as a sign
his reaction to the activity of an apparatus for the representation of shock
an apparatus that is now part of his own traumatized body. The bell ri
and his head lights up.
51. See Robert Sommer, "Beseitigung funktioneller Taubheit besonders bei Soldaten
durch eine experimental-psychologische Methode," Schmidts Jahrbiicher der in- und ausllin-
dischen gesamten Medizin 84 (Feb. 1917): 65-75; hereafter abbreviated "B." Sommer's appara-
tus is based on one he had earlier employed in his experimental research. See Sommer,
"Analyse der directen Ausdrucksbewegungen," Lehrbuch der psychopathologischen Untersuch-
ungs-Methoden (Berlin, 1899), pp. 97-98. The representational function of the Apparatus for
the Representation of the Shock Reaction differs from that of its predecessor. The 1916
device is not an instrument of analysis; it is more like a theatrical prop.
FIG. 19.-Raoul
on pink paper.
seum for Mode
Society (ARS), N
reacted to t
described ab
tion), activa
seeing the ev
excited and i
p. 71). When
again, the p
individual le
OFFEAHBDC
plete text of
Hausmann w
rated in the
not especiall
displayed in
to be declaim
with the spe
52. On the ma
Riha and Giint
53. I base this description on recordings of Hausmann performing his sound poems.
One such performance, called "phoneme bbb," is featured as part of the collection Lipstick
Traces, Rough Trade Records R2901/2902, 1993, a soundtrack to Marcus's book of the same
title; see note 11.
54. Benjamin, "Attested Auditor of Books," "One- Way Street" and Other Writings, trans.
Edmund Jephcott and Kingsley Shorter (London, 1979), p. 61; my italics.
55. For a chilling description of the treatment of a mute war neurotic with a combina-
tion of electricity and verbalized military discipline, see Pat Barker's historical novel, Regen-
eration (1991; Harmondsworth, 1993), pp. 226-34. It is interesting to note, concerning the
scene in the novel, that the neurologist W. H. R. Rivers experiences a profound affective
identification with the subject of the traumatic cure Rivers observes being administered by
his colleague, Dr. Lewis Yealland. Rivers's identification in part enacts a poignant reversal
of the mimetic identification of the subject of trauma with the source of trauma (the aggres-
sor) in the traumatic scene, a reversal undoubtedly facilitated by the fact that Rivers himself
suffered from a stutter. On trauma and affective identification, see note 44. Rivers's trauma-
tophilic identification with the subject of the electrical shocking cure in turn recalls the
passage on unconscious traumatophilia in "TT"; see n. 49.
A recent description of current practices of aversive therapy involving electric shock
also brings Ferenczi's hypothesis of unconscious traumatophilia to mind. "He might never
be entirely freed of shock," said a psychologist at the Behavior Research Institute in Provi-
dence, Rhode Island, of one of his most difficult cases, "like someone with vision problems
who always needs glasses" (N. R. Kleinfield, 'Journey toward Independence: From Electric
Shock to Glimmer of Hope for a Better Life," New York Times, 23 June 1997, p. A14). The
eyeglasses analogy strikes me as grotesque in regard to the patient, a seventeen-year-old
who scratched himself compulsively-to the point of self-mutilation-and whose nearly
three thousand daily scratches were eventually reduced to fewer than thirty through the
administration of as many as one hundred shocks a day, delivered through electrodes
mounted on his torso, arms, and legs. A photograph of the patient (fig. 20) is a horrible
after-image of Heartfield Gone Wild and Hilzinger's Electric Warming Device.
56. On the violent language of dada poetry as a response to World War I and its
propaganda, see Marcus, Lipstick Traces, p. 195. The relation of dada photomontage to war-
time advertising is addressed in my Berlin Dada Montage.
HE.~
I~~?
. .............
FIG. 20
58. Elias Canetti, The Torch in My Ear, trans. Joachim Neugroschel (New York, 1982),
pp. 270-71; trans. mod. For the original German, see Canetti, Die Fackel im Ohr (1980;
Frankfurt am Main, 1982), pp. 252-53.
59. Hausmann, letter to Jan Tschichold, 2 Apr. 1930, Mappe 3.1.1, BG RHA 769,
Raoul Hausmann Archive, Berlinische Galerie, Landesmuseum ffir Moderne Kunst, Photo-
graphie und Architektur, Berlin. Hausmann's comment emerged in the context of the dada-
ists' dispute over the invention of photomontage, and he remarked specifically that "Herr
Heartfield, ein bekannter Hysteriker, ist keineswegs der Erfinder der Photomontage" (Mr.
Heartfield, a well-known hysteric, is under no circumstances the inventor of photomon-
tage). Hausmann's remark was a superficial jab, and I do not intend to make it bear much
analytical weight, but I think it is worth pointing out that hysteria formed a part of the
dadaists' vocabulary of self-description. Indeed Grosz had lobbed the same accusation (or
diagnosis) at Hausmann as early as 1921, when he began a letter to Hausmann: "Du
schreibst einen Brief wie eine hysterische Frau" (you write a letter like a hysterical woman)
(Hannah Hoch: Eine Lebenscollage, ed. Ralf Burmeister and Eckhard Ftirlus, 2 vols. [Ostfil-
dern-Ruit, 1995], 2:34-35). I am grateful to Wolfgang Erler and Eva Ziichner of the Ber-
linische Galerie for their kindness in granting me access to and permission to quote from
unpublished materials in the Raoul Hausmann Archive.
60. Once more it is worth keeping in mind that Ferenczi's descriptions of the war
neuroses and of hysterical materializations often employ a metaphorics of the visual that is
explicitly associated with the production and display of art. See also notes 7 and 63.
61. Hausmann, "Synthetisches Cino der Malerei," Bilanz der Feierlichkeit: Texte bis 1933,
ed. Michael Erlhoff, 2 vols. (Munich, 1982), 1:16.
62. Ibid.
63. Regarding Hausmann's notion of dada montage as proto- cinematic, it is interest-
ing to note that Ferenczi, in his discussion of the symptoms of his war-neurotic patients at
the lecture published as his 1916-17 article, seems to me implicitly to have declared both
the medium of still photography and the presentation of the patient himself (in the flesh)
insufficient to the task of representing the physical conversion symptoms of the war neuroses.
Cinematography, Ferenczi noted, might have been the appropriate technique for their
representation: "the gait of the trembler is most remarkable; he gives the impression of
spastic paresis; but the varying mixture of tremor, rigidity, and weakness occasions quite
peculiar gaits, possibly only to be reproduced cinematographically" (vielleicht nur kinemato-
graphisch reproduzierbare Gangarten) ("TT," p. 125; trans. mod.). I read Ferenczi's comment
on cinematography as an expression of his confidence in the capacity of that technique
(over and against the capacities of the unaided human eye) to make visible the operations
of the body. Although it lies beyond the scope of the present essay, this aspect of Ferenczi's
theorization of the war neuroses demands attention regarding his broader discussion of
hysterical materialization and his understanding of the relation of hysterical materialization
to other forms of plastic representation, in this case photography and cinematography. See
also notes 7 and 60. Perhaps Ferenczi was aware of the German psychiatrist Max Nonne's
"real situation" that dada will force its viewers to recognize is emphatically
a material one, a bodily one. In dada's synthetic cinema of painting, in
montage, marvelous objects made of mundane "real material" correspond
organically to the disposition of the viewer's own body, a body so stiff it
threatens to shatter. Dada, says Hausmann, compels the viewer's bodily
identification with the traumatic shocks it simulates. Like Canetti's deli-
cate description of Heartfield, Hausmann's ranting presentation of dada
contains the suggestion that, for the dadaist, traumatic shock is simul-
taneously an attack and a "spontaneous attempt at cure." (Hausmann
considered naming the text Psychoanalytisches Cino der Malerei.)64 In dada
the spontaneous attempt at cure, the offer of assistance to a man howling
in a military hospital or crawling on all fours, is embodied in "contradic-
tory organisms," objects that might help the man get up on his feet, as
Grosz indicated the monteur Heartfield needed to be helped; or might
leave him spinning, like the neurasthenics in Grosz's poem; or might give
him reason, finally, to collapse.
Berlin dada imagined for itself an audience of traumatophiles. A re-
view of a 1919 dada performance suggests that the movement may have
found one: "The success was tremendous. An alienist [Psychiater] in the
tenth row made a stupid face. A neo-Kantian in the fifteenth row sweated
egg-sized drops and mumbled as he grew faint: 'synthetic nihilism.' But
tears ran down the cheeks of a wounded veteran [Kriegsbeschddigter] in the
last row, from which it is to be surmised that in his heart he had answered
the question: 'What is dada?' unequivocally."65
1916 film of his war-neurotic patients, featuring before-and-after footage of soldiers appar-
ently cured of psychogenic symptoms through suggestive treatment. See Lerner, "Rational-
izing the Therapeutic Arsenal," p. 140. On psychiatric photography, see Georges Didi-
Huberman, Invention de l'hystirie: Charcot et l'iconographie photographique de la Salpetriere (Paris,
1982), and The Face of Madness: Hugh W Diamond and the Origin of Psychiatric Photography, ed.
Gilman (New York, 1976). Allan Sekula's "The Body and the Archive," October, no. 39 (Win-
ter 1986): 3-64, would be relevant to further consideration of the issues raised in this note.
64. See Hausmann, "Auflistung von 17 Aufsatztitel," Notizbuch (1918), pp. 97-98, BG
RHA 1751, Raoul Hausmann Archive.
65. Lg., "Dadaismus in der Tribiine," Berliner Birsen-Courier, 2 Dec. 1919.
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1344161?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Critical Inquiry
James A. W. Heffernan
Movies speak mainly to the eyes. Though they started talking in words
some seventy years ago, what they say to our ears seldom overpowers or
even matches the impact of what they show us. This does not mean that
film is a medium "essentially" visual, any more than theater is. Many of
the films made in the twenty-five years following the 1927 advent of the
talkie crackle with dialogue worthy of the stage, which in fact is where
many of them originated. Even in the visually captivating Citizen Kane,
the single word Rosebud resonates just as memorably as any of its shots,
and one notable film from the mid-twentieth century-Billy Wilder's
Sunset Boulevard (1950)-has been plausibly read as an allegory of how
the word contests the power of the cinematic image. But whether or
not this film ultimately "confirms the triumph of the female image," as
W. J. T. Mitchell suggests,1 or demonstrates the ironizing power of the
word, it cannot help but remind us of what film and film theory alike
In its long journey from first draft to publication, this essay has benefitted from sug-
gestions made by a considerable number of readers and listeners. Special thanks to William
Spengemann, Eric Rentschler, Tom Mitchell, Albert LaValley, Philip Pochoda, Morton Pa-
ley, Hillis Miller, Jay Parini, Richard Johnson, Linda Hughes, Anne Mellor, and Jerrold
Hogle, and thanks also for the comments of those who heard earlier versions of this essay
at Irvine; Berkeley; Middlebury; the Yale Center for British Art; and Trinity College, Dub-
lin. Lastly I thank Aeron Hunt for her meticulous editing.
1. W. J. T. Mitchell, "Going Too Far with the Sister Arts," in Space, Time, Image, Sign:
Essays on Literature and the Visual Arts, ed. James A. W. Heffernan (New York, 1987), p. 9.
133
2. Andre Bazin, "The Evolution of the Language of Cinema" (1950), in What Is Cin-
ema? trans. Hugh Gray, 2 vols. (Berkeley, 1971), 1:28.
3. I cite Bazin precisely because he treated sound as an asset to film, unlike critics
such as Rudolf Arnheim, who thought sound fundamentally alien to the art of manipulating
silent images for expressive effect. See Rudolf Arnheim, "The Making of a Film" [selection
from Film as Art (1933)], in Film Theory and Criticism, 4th ed., ed. Gerald Mast, Marshall
Cohen, and Leo Braudy (New York, 1992), pp. 275-77. More recently, Stanley Cavell has
argued that while movies can effectively break silence with speech, their power lies chiefly
in their images, which convey "the unsayable by showing experience beyond the reach of
words" (Stanley Cavell, The World Viewed: Reflections on the Ontology of Film [1971; Cambridge,
1979], p. 152).
4. See Bazin, "The Evolution of the Language of Cinema," pp. 33-36.
5. Long before Bazin asserted that "the sound image" is "far less flexible than the
visible image," Roman Jakobson observed that sound need not be synchronously bound to
images in talking films. See Bazin, "The Evolution of the Language of Cinema," p. 33, and
Roman Jakobson, "Is the Cinema in Decline?" (1933), in Russian Formalist Film Theory, ed.
Herbert Eagle (Ann Arbor, Mich., 1981), p. 164.
6. See Christian Metz, Film Language: A Semiotics of the Cinema, trans. Michael Taylor
(New York, 1974), pp. 108-46.
7. See Kaja Silverman, The Subject of Semiotics (New York, 1983), pp. 201-5.
8. Percy Bysshe Shelley, "A Defence of Poetry, or Remarks Suggested by an Essay Enti-
tled 'The Four Ages of Poetry"' (1821), Shelley's Poetry and Prose, ed. Donald H. Reiman and
Sharon B. Powers (New York, 1977), p. 483.
9. The namelessness of the being created by Victor Frankenstein makes the very act
of designating him problematic. Victor calls him a "miserable monster" from the moment
he is animated-simply because of the way he appears (Mary Shelley, Frankenstein; or, the
Modern Prometheus, ed. Maurice Hindle [Harmondsworth, 1992], p. 57; hereafter abbrevi-
ated F). Shorn of Victor's instant prejudice against him-a prejudice shared by everyone
else who sees him-he is properly Victor's "'creature,'" which is what he calls himself (F, p.
96). Yet when he sees his own reflection for the first time, he concludes that he is "'in reality
[a] monster"' (F, p. 110). Taking this cue, I call him a monster except where special condi-
tions necessitate the term "creature."
10. Following common practice, I refer to the 1931 Universal Frankenstein as James
Whale's version because he directed it. But the genesis of this film exemplifies the way
filmmaking disperses the notion of authorship-a topic I cannot adequately explore in this
essay. Based on an Americanized version of Peggy Webling's 1927 London stage play of the
novel, the screenplay for the 1931 Frankenstein was credited to Garrett Fort and Francis
Edward Faragoh but shaped in part by three other writers (Robert Florey, John L. Balder-
ston, and Richard L. Schayer), and at least one more-the young John Huston, no less-
helped with the prologue. See Wheeler Winston Dixon, "The Films of Frankenstein," in
Approaches to Teaching Shelley's "Frankenstein," ed. Stephen C. Behrendt (New York, 1990),
p. 169. See also David J. Skal, The Monster Show: A Cultural History of Horror (New York,
1993), p. 138. Even if we hold Whale chiefly responsible for translating a multiauthored
ley's monster leaves us with a poignant apologia pro vita sua delivered to
Walton over the body of Victor; Whale's creature dies in a burning wind-
mill, while Elizabeth and Victor (unaccountably named Henry) both sur-
vive to beget what Victor's father (who also survives, in perfect health)
expects will be a son. The latest film version is much closer to the book
but nonetheless adds its own twists. In Kenneth Branagh's Mary Shelley's
Frankenstein (1994), the creature rips out Elizabeth's heart and in so doing
reenacts what filmmakers regularly do to Mary Shelley's text. They rip
out its heart by making the creature speechless, as Whale's version did, or
at the very least cutting out his narrative, as even Branagh's version does.
What then can film versions of Frankenstein offer to academic critics
of the novel? Can they be anything more than vulgarizations or travesties
of the original? To answer these questions in anything but the negative,
we must consider what film can tell us-or show us-about the role of the
visual in the life of the monster represented by the text. If film versions of
the novel ignore or elide the inner life of the monster, they nonetheless
foreground for the viewer precisely what the novel largely hides from the
reader. By forcing us to face the monster's physical repulsiveness, which
he can never deny or escape and which aborts his every hope of gaining
sympathy, film versions of Frankenstein prompt us to rethink his monstros-
ity in terms of visualization: how do we see the monster, what does he
see, and how does he want to be seen? To answer these questions, I will
chiefly consider three of the nearly two hundred films that Frankenstein
has spawned: Whale's version, Branagh's version, and Mel Brooks's Young
Frankenstein (1974).1
To learn why academic critics may need film to help answer the ques-
tions I have posed, consider two recent essays that both set out to explain
the monster in terms of his body. Bette London gives a new twist to femi-
nist readings of the novel by arguing that it makes a spectacle of stricken
masculinity-of the broken, enervated, or disfigured male body-and
screenplay into the film we call his, the crucial scene in which the creature unintentionally
drowns the child Maria-a scene that for at least one critic "utterly" shapes the meaning of
the film as a whole film (Dixon, "The Films of Frankenstein," p. 171)-embodies not so much
Whale's intentions as those of Boris Karloff as shown below in section 3.
11. My source for the total number of Frankenstein films, including independent and
privately distributed versions, is Steven Earl Forry, Hideous Progenies: Dramatizations of "Fran-
kenstein"from Mary Shelley to the Present (Philadelphia, 1990), p. 127. For annotated lists of the
more notable versions, see Alan G. Barbour, "The Frankenstein Films," in Radu Florescu, In
Search of Frankenstein (Boston, 1975), pp. 189-211, and Leonard Wolf, "A Selected Franken-
stein Filmography," in Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein": The Classic Tale of Terror Reborn on Film, ed.
Diana Landau (New York, 1994), pp. 186-88.
thus challenges "the singular authority of masculinity and ... the fixity
of sexual positions."'2 Peter Brooks likewise highlights Mary Shelley's rep-
resentation of the male body, but his argument turns on the contrast be-
tween the ugliness of the creature's body and the eloquence of his speech.
Caught in the contradiction between the visual and the verbal, between-
in Lacanian terms-the imaginary order of the mirror stage and the sym-
bolic, acculturating order of language, the Monster (as Brooks calls him)
is that which "exceeds the very basis of classification, language itself."13
Each of these two readings aims to define the verbalized body that
the text exhibits to the reader. Yet London turns the body of the not-yet-
animated monster into a universalized sign of masculine vulnerability,
disfigurement, and pathetic lifelessness. She thus averts her critical gaze
from the sight of the monster's animated body, which is anything but pow-
erless and which appears uniquely repulsive at the very instant it is given
life.'4 In Brooks's argument, the body of the monster is largely consumed
by what the monster himself calls the "'godlike science"' of language-
or, more precisely, by the Lacanian vocabulary of desire, which subordi-
nates the body to the word (F, p. 108). "Love," writes Brooks, "is in essence
the demand to be heard by the other" ("WIM," p. 210; emphasis mine).15
"'Hear my tale,"' says the creature to Victor as he covers Victor's eyes to
relieve them from "the sight of [his] detested form" (F, p. 98). The crea-
ture's very turn to language as a means of "escape from a condition of
'to-be-looked-at-ness"' is precisely the turn reenacted by critics like
Brooks, who define him in essentially linguistic terms ("WIM," p. 218).
Yet the creature's longing to communicate in words-his desire to be
heard-is no more urgent than his longing to be looked at with desire,
with something other than fear and loathing. Just before planting in the
dress of the sleeping Justine the portrait that will lead to her execution,
he fleetingly imagines himself her lover: "I bent over her, and whispered,
'Awake, fairest, thy lover is near-he who would give his life but to obtain
one look of affection from thine eyes: my beloved, awake!"' (F, p. 139).
This remarkable passage, which first appeared in the 1831 edition of
Frankenstein, echoes at once the Song of Solomon (Song of Sol. 2:10-12),
the words spoken by Milton's Satan to a sleeping Eve, and-most poi-
gnantly of all, perhaps-the words spoken by Keats's Porphyro to the
12. Bette London, "Mary Shelley, Frankenstein, and the Spectacle of Masculinity,"
PMLA 108 (Mar. 1993): 264.
13. Peter Brooks, "What Is a Monster? (According to Frankenstein)" Body Work: Objects
of Desire in Modern Narrative (Cambridge, 1993), p. 218; hereafter abbreviated "WIM."
14. "He was ugly [while unfinished]," says Victor; "but when those muscles and joints
were rendered capable of motion, it became a thing such as even Dante could not have
conceived" (F, p. 57).
15. Quoting Jacques Lacan, Brooks writes: "What is finally desired by the speaker is
'the desirer in the other,' that is, that the speaking subject himself be 'called to as desirable"'
("WIM," p. 210). See Jacques Lacan, Le Transfert, vol. 8 of Le Seminaire (Paris, 1991), p. 415.
sleeping Madeline in Keats's "The Eve of St. Agnes."16 Ever since Laura
Mulvey's classic essay on visual pleasure, feminist criticism has sensitized
us to the visual subjugation of women by the gaze of the male, and as
Brooks notes, in his sole reference to film, the condition of "to-be-looked-
at-ness" is the phrase Mulvey uses for the "traditional exhibitionist role"
given to women in film." Yet if the creature's aversion to being seen signi-
fies a feminine or feminist rejection of that role, as Brooks suggests, his
desire to be seen longingly-to be looked at with affection--reminds us
that the capacity to attract and hold such a look is just as often a gender-
neutral source of power as a gendered target of male exploitation (see
"WIM," pp. 218-19).
The doctrine that film subjugates women to the gaze of the male
should also be rethought, as Silverman suggests, with the aid of Lacan's
distinction between the gaze and the look. While the gaze is impersonal,
ubiquitous (issuing "from all sides"), and detached, the look is the desir-
ing act of an eye seeing from just one viewpoint.18 Such an act cannot be
simply identified with male power. As Silverman notes, a film such as
Rainer Werner Fassbinder's Beware of a Holy Whore (1971) "not only ex-
tends desire and the look which expresses it to the female subject, but
makes the male desiring look synonymous with loss of control."'9
What Silverman says of Fassbinder's film might well describe the
acute ambivalence with which Mary Shelley's creature looks at the sleep-
ing Justine. Longing "to obtain one look of affection from [her] eyes," he
is terrified by the thought that if she awakened to see him, she would
curse and denounce him as a murderer (F, p. 139). Though no film
known to me conveys the creature's ambivalence in this scene (Branagh's
brief shot of him looming over Justine shows just his desire), Branagh's
film includes a moment of the creature's tormented looking in another
16. See John Milton, Paradise Lost, in John Milton, ed. Stephen Orgel and Jonathan
Goldberg (Oxford, 1991), bk. 5, 11. 38-47, p. 447; hereafter abbreviated PL. Like the crea-
ture, Porphyro addresses a sleeping lady with feelings of profound ambivalence, eager to
awaken her-"'And now, my love, my seraph fair, awake!'"'-yet petrified when he succeeds:
"Her blue affrayed eyes wide open shone: / Upon his knees he sank, pale as smooth-
sculptured stone" (John Keats, "The Eve of St. Agnes," John Keats: Complete Poems, ed. Jack
Stillinger [Cambridge, Mass., 1982], p. 237, 11. 276, 296-97).
17. Laura Mulvey, "Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema," Visual and Other Pleasures
(Bloomington, Ind., 1989), p. 19. Mulvey's essay first appeared in Screen 16 (Autumn 1975):
6-18. See also "WIM," p. 218.
18. Lacan, The Four Fundamental Concepts of Psycho-Analysis, trans. Alan Sheridan, ed.
Jacques-Alain Miller (New York, 1978), p. 72; quoted in Silverman, Male Subjectivity at the
Margins (New York, 1992), p. 130. Lacan's terms are le regard and l'oeil, which Silverman
respectively calls the "gaze" and the "look."
19. Silverman, Male Subjectivity at the Margins, p. 131. Carol Clover likewise argues that
in slasher films such as Hell Night (1981), the "Final Girl"-a would-be victim who survives
to take revenge on a murderous male-finally assumes the gaze, "making a spectacle of the
killer and a spectator of herself" (Carol J. Clover, "Her Body, Himself: Gender in the
Slasher Film," Representations, no. 20 [Fall 1987]: 219).
20. Elaine Scarry, "On Vivacity: The Difference between Daydreaming and Imagin-
ing-Under-Authorial-Instruction," Representations, no. 52 (Fall 1995): 1.
21. See ibid., p. 9.
22. On this point, see Ellen J. Esrock, The Reader's Eye: Visual Imaging as Reader Response
(Baltimore, 1994), p. 183.
23. Kenneth Branagh, "Frankenstein Reimagined," in Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein," p. 23.
24. In film theory, as in Mary Shelley's novel, the idea of artificial reproduction has
sometimes excited alarm. In 1933, Arnheim wrote that films were already approaching the
"dangerous goal" of manufacturing "an image ... which is astoundingly like some natural
object" (Arnheim, "The Complete Film," [selection from Film as Art (1933)], in Film Theory
and Criticism, p. 50). Declining to tell Walton just how he made the monster, Victor likewise
calls such information "dangerous" (F, p. 52).
25. See Ovid, Metamorphoses, trans. Frank Justus Miller, 2 vols. (Cambridge, Mass.,
1921), 1:6-9 [1.1.78-88].
26. See Anne K. Mellor, Mary Shelley: Her Life, Her Fiction, Her Monsters (New York,
1988), pp. 102-7.
27. See William Nestrick, "Coming to Life: Frankenstein and the Nature of Film Narra-
tive," in The Endurance of "Frankenstein": Essays on Mary Shelley's Novel, ed. George Levine and
U. C. Knoepflmacher (Berkeley, 1979), pp. 294-95.
28. Quoted in ibid., p. 291.
29. The story of this development is complicated by the fact that some pioneer film-
makers such as Louis Lumibre (inventor of the Cinematographe) actually resisted "the
Frankensteinian dream ... of analogical representation, the mythology of victory over
death" even as their inventions helped to realize this dream (Noidl Burch, Life to Those Shad-
ows, trans. and ed. Ben Brewster [Berkeley, 1990], p. 20). As Siegfried Kracauer long ago
noted, Lumibre aimed to reproduce the world while Mlies sought to re-create it. See Sieg-
fried Kracauer, Theory of Film:The Redemption of Physical Reality (New York, 1965), pp. 30-33.
he says, "and breathless horror and disgust filled my heart" (F, p. 56).
The nightmare reenacts this change by essentially reversing what Victor
has done-bestow animation on a composite of lifeless body parts-and
precisely reversing what he had hoped to do: "renew life where death
had apparently devoted the body to corruption" (F, p. 53). In his night-
mare, Victor is surprised to see Elizabeth walking down a street in Ingol-
stadt, but as soon as he embraces and kisses her, she turns into the
worm-ridden corpse of his mother (see F, p. 57). This sudden dissolving
of one image into another is "supremely cinematic," as Branagh has said
of Frankenstein as a whole.30 At the same time, the passage encapsulates
the greatest of all ironies in the novel, the fact that Victor's ambition to
create and renew life leads only to death. We will shortly see how Bra-
nagh's film intensifies this irony by pursuing some of the implications of
the nightmare-even while eliding the nightmare itself.
30. Quoted in "The Filmmakers and Their Creations," Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein," p.
177. Curiously enough, neither Branagh's film nor any other film of Frankenstein known to
me includes the nightmare.
31. See Skal, The Monster Show, pp. 131-33. Donna Haraway explicitly exempts the
cyborg-a composite of animal and machine-from the creature's heterosexual longing for
organic or Edenic wholeness. See Donna J. Haraway, Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Rein-
vention of Nature (New York, 1991), p. 151.
32. While the novel often asks us to imagine the monster's looking, as I have already
noted, the only description of his looks appears in Victor's account of his newly animated
form. Not even when the monster is terrified by his own reflection in a pool do we get any
further instructions on how to visualize him; see F, pp. 56, 110.
33. This subjective camera technique has been used for parts of many films, such as
Delmer Daves's Dark Passage (1947) and is used throughout Robert Montgomery's Lady in
the Lake (1946), where Montgomery himself plays the hero with the camera strapped to his
chest. See Seymour Chatman, Story and Discourse: Narrative Structure in Fiction and Film (Ith-
aca, N.Y., 1978), p. 160.
34. In chapter 5, for instance, David recalls how he drifted in and out of sleep during
breakfast with the flute-playing Master at Salem House, hearing by turns the actual strains
of the flute and the imagined sounds of the coach he would soon be taking. But the drawing
shows him simply as an insensate object-a boy sitting asleep on a chair. See Charles Dick-
ens, David Copperfield (New York, 1950), pp. 79-81. My thanks to Grant Cerny for this ex-
ample.
35. According to Chatman, one of the many differences between fiction and film is
that while fictional narratives may operate from a generalized perspective, film is always
shot from a specific point of view-the viewpoint of the camera. See Chatman, "What Nov-
els Can Do That Films Can't (and Vice Versa)" Critical Inquiry 7 (Autumn 1980):132-33.
Paradoxically, however, film versions of a novel told from the viewpoint of a single character
are almost never consistently shot from that viewpoint.
36. On the other hand, the frontispiece to the 1831 edition of Frankenstein, which
depicts the moment of the monster's first stirring, shows a well muscled male nude whose
only serious abnormalities-apart from his size-are an elongated right hand and the
sprouting of his head from his right shoulder (reproduced as the frontispiece to The Mary
nagh and his collaborators ask the right question about the creature's
effect on Victor: "Why, after all this time, having seen what he was putting
together, should he be so repelled and then be so frightened by it?"37 The
question becomes even more pointed when we realize that Victor made
the creature from features "selected ... as beautiful" (F, p. 56; emphasis
mine). What makes Victor's composition of such beautiful features mon-
strous?
In part, the answer made by Branagh's film is much like the now-
familiar answer formulated by critics such as Ellen Moers, who claim that
Victor's sudden loathing for the newly animated creature he has long
labored to construct evokes the sense of "revulsion against newborn life"
that may be felt by any new mother, as Mary Shelley knew from her own
experience.38 Branagh's film makes this point graphically. First, the mon-
ster lunges from a great copper sarcophagus filled with water to make it
a kind of womb. After he lands sprawling in the spill tank under it, Victor
lifts him up, vainly tries to show him how to walk, then ties him standing
to a set of chains. But when the struggling creature is struck by a falling
piece of wood and shortly goes limp, Victor concludes that he himself has
killed this luckless heir to "'massive birth defects,"' and that "'this evil
must be destroyed . .. forever.'""39 Since Branagh's Victor tries to help the
creature at first and seems dismayed to think that he has killed him, he
is decidedly more paternal-or maternal-than the Victor of the text.
But when (in the next scene) Branagh's Victor awakens in his bedroom
to find the naked, stitched-up creature looming over him, he cries out
"No!" and flees ("S," p. 84). Like the Victor of the text, who finds the
ugliness of the creature inconceivably magnified by its acquisition of the
capacity to move, Branagh's Victor is horrified by life itself-by the living
sight of what he has made (see F, p. 57).
Branagh's answer to his own question, then, is at once visual and
Shelley Reader, ed. Betty T. Bennett and Charles E. Robinson [New York, 1990]). Staged
versions of the novel include at least one beautiful monster. In the Royal Ballet version,
which premiered in London on 26 July 1985, the monster was represented by an Ariel-like
figure costumed and made up wholly in white. (My thanks to Linda Hughes for this infor-
mation.)
37. Branagh, "Frankenstein Reimagined," p. 19.
38. Ellen Moers, "Female Gothic," in The Endurance of "Frankenstein," p. 81. Mary Shel-
ley called Frankenstein her "hideous progeny" (Mary Shelley, author's introduction to the
standard novels edition, F, p. 10; hereafter abbreviated "AI"). Also, as critics often remind
us, she had already endured before writing it the death of her first child, born prematurely
in February 1815, who lived just twelve days. See Muriel Spark, Mary Shelley (New York,
1987), p. 45. In itself this hardly explains why Victor is horrified by the very animation of
the creature and dismayed by its stubborn survival. But Victor's "labour" in his "workshop
of filthy creation" (F, pp. 52, 53) may well signify the repulsiveness of child-bearing. Moers
calls Frankenstein "a horror story of maternity" (Moers, "Female Gothic," p. 83).
39. Steph Lady and Frank Darabont, "The Screenplay," in Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein,"
p. 81; hereafter abbreviated "S."
psychological. His Victor rejects the creature in part because any new-
born being may disgust its begetter and in part because this one-in the
film-has apparently risen twice from the dead, more "hideous" than "a
mummy again endued with animation," in the punning words of the
novel, which has just described Victor's nightmare of embracing his dead
mother (F, p. 57). But Branagh's Victor is also horrified by the sheer ugli-
ness of the creature, by the barbed-wire stitches that harrow his body
and distend his face. The stitching of the creature--nowhere explicitly
mentioned in Mary Shelley's text-originates in film with Jack Pierce's
makeup for Boris Karloff in the Whale Frankenstein, where the creature's
face and body appear discreetly sutured. But the body of De Niro's crea-
ture in Branagh's film is vividly, cruelly stitched, and thus reminds us that
Mary Shelley's creature was precisely not a reanimated corpse-some-
thing Victor had so far found "impossible" to produce (F, p. 53)-but a
patchwork quilt of flesh cut from dead bodies, a paradoxically ugly com-
posite of features "selected ... as beautiful."
With singular irony, Victor's phrase evokes a leading principle of neo-
classical aesthetics. Encapsulated in the story of Zeuxis, the ancient Greek
artist who painted Helen of Troy by selecting and combining the loveliest
parts of the most beautiful virgins of Crotona, this was the principle of
what Sir Joshua Reynolds called "Ideal Beauty" in visual art: a general-
ized shape abstracted from the comparative study of particular human
figures, a "central form ... from which every deviation is deformity."40
Victor deviates from the central form, of course, by making his creature
eight feet tall. But otherwise his project turns neoclassical aesthetics on
its head. By applying to corpses a formula calculated to produce ideal
beauty in painting and sculpture, Victor generates only deformity: the
deformity of a creature artificially assembled.41 It is this myth of miscre-
ation, of artistic ambition run monstrously awry, that scores of filmmakers
have sought to illuminate in their own art-an art which may yet lead us
to a deeper understanding of Mary Shelley's.
40. Sir Joshua Reynolds, Discourses on Art, ed. Robert R. Wark (New Haven, Conn.,
1975), p. 45. For an account of the story of Zeuxis, see Jean H. Hagstrum, The SisterArts: The
Tradition of Literary Pictorialism and English Poetry from Dryden to Gray (Chicago, 1958), p. 14.
41. Marie-H61~ne Huet suggests that the creature is monstrous because Frankenstein's
art is purely reproductive or (in Plato's term) eikastiken, "without interpretation, without
proportion or the necessary betrayal of the model that makes the phantastiken object un-
faithful to nature but at the same time aesthetically beautiful" (Marie-Hlene Huet, Mon-
strous Imagination [Cambridge, 1993], p. 132). Yet even if we construe Victor's act of
assembling actual features as the reproduction of a human body, the creature is an explicitly
enlarged-and thus artfully transformed-version of the model, "about eight feet in
height, and proportionably large" (F p. 52; emphasis mine).
42. See Dixon, "The Films of Frankenstein," p. 171. Whale ordered Karloff to raise the
girl over his head and brutally cast her down; Karloff wanted to "pick her up gently and
put her in the water exactly as he had done to the flower" (quoted in Donald E Glut, The
Frankenstein Legend [Methuen, N.J., 1973], pp. 112-13).
43. Mary Poovey, "My Hideous Progeny: Mary Shelley and the Feminization of Ro-
manticism," PMLA 95 (May 1980): 337.
44. Dickens, Great Expectations, ed. Angus Calder (1860-61; Harmondsworth, 1985),
p. 354.
51. See Wolf, The Annotated Dracula (New York, 1975), p. 300. Daniel Pick aptly notes
that Dracula should not be lumped with Frankenstein under the undifferentiated heading of
"gothic" because the later novel reflects a major issue of the late nineteenth century. It
expresses, he argues, "a vision of the bio-medical degeneration of the race in general and
the metropolitan population in particular" (Daniel Pick, "'Terrors of the Night': Dracula
and 'Degeneration' in the Late Nineteenth Century," Critical Quarterly 30 [Winter 1988]: 75).
52. These drawings are reprinted in Skal, The Monster Show, p. 133.
53. See Homer, The Iliad, trans. Richmond Lattimore (1951; Chicago, 1978), bk. 2, 11.
216, 249, p. 82.
54. William Shakespeare, Richard III, ed. Mark Eccles (Harmondsworth, 1988), 1.2.57,
p. 41.
55. Dante, Inferno, in The Divine Comedy, trans. Charles Singleton, 3 vols. (Princeton,
N.J., 1970), 1:173 (17.10-11). See also PL, bk. 2, 1. 650, p. 391.
56. Jeffrey Dahmer killed seventeen young men and boys, had sex with some of their
dead bodies, skinned and dismembered them, tried to lobotomize at least one of them,
spray-painted their skulls, preserved body parts in formaldehyde so he could look at them
while masturbating, kept human hearts in his freezer, and ate body parts so as to reanimate
the dead within him. He was murdered in 1994 while serving a life sentence. See Edward
Walsh, "Murderer Jeffrey Dahmer Beaten to Death in Prison," Lebanon (N.H.) Valley News,
29 Nov. 1994, p. Al.
57. Oxford English Dictionary, s.v. "monster." On the construal of monsters as portents
in the sixteenth century, see Lorraine Daston, "Marvelous Facts and Miraculous Evidence
in Early Modern Europe,"' Critical Inquiry 18 (Autumn 1991): 93-124.
58. Nietzsche, Twilight of the Idols, p. 34.
59. Percy had read the Symposium in Greek by 7 December 1817, when he cites the
speech of Agathon in a letter to William Godwin. See Percy Bysshe Shelley, Letters, ed. Fred-
erick L. Jones, 2 vols. (Oxford, 1964), 1:574. Mary promptly transcribed his translation,
and from it I quote the Symposium below. See Mary Shelley, The Journals of Mary Shelley,
1814-1844, 1:220-22. See also Percy Bysshe Shelley, The Banquet: Translated from Plato, in
Prose, vol. 7 of The Complete Works of Percy Bysshe Shelley, ed. Roger Ingpen and Walter E.
Peck, 10 vols. (London, 1930), pp. 165-220; hereafter abbreviated B. William Veeder treats
Plato as one of several sources for Mary's views on androgyny, a topic central to Aristopha-
trum in fronte, deus in animo, a god of wisdom with the face of a monster.
Alcibiades compares him to Marsyas, the ugly satyr whose pipe makes
music that is enchantingly divine, for the ugly Socrates makes Marsyan
music with his philosophic words (see B, pp. 210-11).
Are echoes of this music audible in the philosophic eloquence of
Mary Shelley's monster? Though enchanted by the sounds of old De La-
cey's guitar (see F, pp. 104, 113), the monster does not know the Sym-
posium as he knows Paradise Lost. But Mary Shelley probably knew
something of Plato's dialogue by the time she wrote Frankenstein, and what
the monster says to Victor reflects-in part by a kind of desperate inver-
sion-something of what Socrates says he has learned from Diotima
about love. When the monster tells Victor that he must have a female "of
the same species, and ... the same defects" as himself (F, p. 139), he
inverts Diotima's definition of love as the yearning not for one's other half
(Aristophanes' theory) but for the good (see B, pp. 200-201). Love, says
Diotima, "embraces those bodies which are beautiful rather than those
which are deformed" (B, p. 204). Ironically, the monster's instincts con-
firm this axiom. Gazing on the miniature portrait of the "most lovely
woman" that was once Victor's mother, he is filled with delight (F p. 138).
But knowing that he can excite in beautiful creatures only fear and loath-
ing, he bitterly cultivates a "burning passion" for "one as deformed
and horrible" as he is, someone who "would not deny herself to me"
(E p. 139).
Apparently, then, the monster cannot reach even the first step of the
ladder that would lead from particular to "supreme beauty" in Diotima's
discourse (B, p. 207). Yet he startlingly resembles the figure of Love that
Diotima describes. Like Love, a "great Daemon" holding "an intermedi-
ate place between what is divine and what is mortal" (B, p. 197), Victor's
creature is a "daemon" of superhuman strength and endurance (F, p.
161). Like Love, too, the creature is "for ever poor,... squalid,' and
"homeless,... ever the companion of Want" (B, p. 198). In the Symposium,
Love's poverty and squalor help to show what the seeker for love must
learn: that the mind's beauty transcends the "mere beauty of the outward
form" (B, p. 206). In Frankenstein, we are nowhere told that the monster
seeks a beauty of mind. But if he wants Victor to "make [him] happy,"
could he be satisfied by a woman who offered no more than the "same
nes' definition of love in the dialogue and to Mary's critique of the isolated, self-absorbed
masculine ego. See William Veeder, Mary Shelley and Frankenstein: The Fate of Androgyny (Chi-
cago, 1986), pp. 23-24. Whether or not Mary knew anything about the Symposium before
publishing the first edition of Frankenstein in 1818, she uses Plato's Diotima in the frame-
story for the first version of the next novel she wrote, Mathilda. See Andrea K. Henderson,
Romantic Identities: Varieties of Subjectivity, 1774-1830 (Cambridge, 1996), p. 125. In any case,
the ugliness of Socrates sheds an important and generally neglected light on the kind of
monstrosity the creature embodies.
Let us now revisit this nightmare and the desire it signifies with the
aid of Mel Brooks's Young Frankenstein, a film scripted by Gene Wilder,
who also plays Friedrich Frankenstein, the eponymous hero. At the end
of the film, Madeline Kahn's Elizabeth not only survives but also falls in
love with the monster when he abducts her. Lulled by her own mood
music (she sings "Ah! sweet mystery of life") and enchanted by his charm
as he suavely lights two cigarettes and gives her one (like Paul Henreid in
Now, Voyager [1942]), she ends up marrying him and playing tigress to his
tame executive, lustily leaping into a bed where the creature sits up read-
ing the Wall Street Journal. (Friedrich has selflessly traded his brain for the
monster's, which is what makes the creature "normal" at the end.) What
do these sophomoric pranks have to do with Mary Shelley's novel? They
have, I think, quite a lot to do with one of the myths lurking just beneath
the surface of its plot, the myth of Beauty and the Beast. It is powerfully
implied not only by the creature's response to the sleeping Justine but
60. Quoted in Betsy Hearne, Beauty and the Beast: Visions and Revisions of an Old Tale
(Chicago, 1989), pp. 34-35. The earliest known literary version of the myth appeared in
France in 1740, and in 1811 (when Mary was fourteen) an English poem attributed to
Charles Lamb and titled Beauty and the Beast: Or a Rough Outside with a Gentle Heart appeared
as a children's book. See Hearne, Beauty and the Beast, pp. 2, 34. Since Lamb first met Godwin
in 1805 and since Mary Shelley saw him socially at least twice in the winter and spring of
1817, when she was writing Frankenstein, it seems more than possible that she knew some-
thing of this book. See Mary Shelley, The Journals of Mary Shelley, 1814-1844, 1:164, 172.
"made [him] a fiend" (F, p. 97). Nothing about the creature she presents
to us is more poignant than his longing to be loved. In Young Frankenstein,
Elizabeth gratifies this desire. Acting out-campily, to be sure-the crea-
ture's deepest fantasy, she plays a loving Beauty to his Beast.
Wacky as it is, the monster's marriage to Elizabeth in Young Franken-
stein also points directly to the sexual energies that Mary Shelley's Victor
so perversely thwarts in himself and the monster alike. When Victor tears
apart the monster's mate and thus breaks his promise to furnish one, the
monster grimly tells Victor, "'I shall be with you on your wedding-night'"
(F, p. 163). As he later tells Walton, Victor's decision to take a bride for
himself while denying one to the monster drove the monster to kill Eliza-
beth (F, p. 212). But the killing of Elizabeth is not just an act of vengeance.
It is also a vicarious expression of Victor's misogyny and, contradictorily,
a tortured expression of the creature's desire for the woman he kills.
First of all, as the psychic son or "symbolic projection" of Victor's
imagination, in Poovey's words, the creature vengefully reenacts Victor's
misogynistic dismemberment of the female creature, an act prompted
largely-as Mellor has argued-by Victor's fear of what an unregulated
female might do.61 Having set out to preempt the generative powers of
women, Victor is horrified by the spectre of rampant heterosexual repro-
duction, by "a race of devils [who] would be propagated upon the earth"
(F, p. 160). This overt fear of what a pair of monsters might beget suggests
a deeper fear of what any woman could beget, and more specifically of
what his own bride might generate. For this reason, the creature's killing
of Elizabeth gratifies one of Victor's deepest wishes.62 In refusing to con-
summate his marriage on his wedding night, in leaving Elizabeth alone
in their room while he stalks the inn corridors in search of the creature,
Victor unconsciously invites the creature to take her.
The taking, I submit, is sexual as well as murderous-a tortured ex-
pression of the monster's hitherto frustrated desire. Just after Victor de-
stroys the mate-to-be before the eyes of the monster and swears never to
create one, the monster says, "You are my creator, but I am your master-
obey!" (F, p. 162). Victor's refusal to do so goads the creature to exercise
in his own murderous way the traditional right of a feudal master: the
droit de seigneur, the lord's right to take his vassal's bride on her wedding
61. Poovey, "My Hideous Progeny," p. 337. See also Mellor, Mary Shelley, pp. 119-20.
62. Reminding us that Victor sees Elizabeth at various times as his "cousin" and "sis-
ter" and that she dissolves into his dead mother in his nightmare, James Twitchell argues
that Victor unconsciously uses the monster to punish Elizabeth for exciting Victor's incestu-
ous desires (F, pp. 35, 146; see also F, p. 57); for Twitchell, the novel as a whole allegorizes
"the male impulses and anxieties about incest as well as the female impulses and anxieties
about birthing" (James B. Twitchell, "Frankenstein and the Anatomy of Horror," Georgia Re-
view 37 [Spring 1983]: 60; see also pp. 50-53). Twitchell's argument is plausible as far as it
goes, but does not-in my judgement-reckon sufficiently with Victor's misogyny and the
monster's desires.
night. Whether or not this brutal custom was ever mentioned in the his-
tory course that the creature overheard Felix giving to Safie (see F, pp.
115-16), it is central to the plot of Mozart's Marriage of Figaro (1786),
which Mary Shelley knew about well before she finished writing Franken-
stein.63 The echo of the droit de seigneur in the creature's wedding-night
assault on Elizabeth amplifies all of the other signals pointing to rape: the
creature's own fierce desire for a mate and the appearance of Elizabeth
herself when, drawn by a scream from her room, Victor finds her dead
body "thrown across the bed, her head hanging down, and her pale and
distorted features half covered by her hair. Every where I turn I see the
same figure-her bloodless arms and relaxed form flung by the mur-
derer on its bridal bier" (F, p. 189). In this vivid picture of a "relaxed"
body thrown or flung across the "bridal bier" of her bed, Victor portrays
the victim of a murderous rape: a complex expression of his own misog-
yny, of the creature's lust for revenge, and of his frustrated longing for
a mate.
63. See Mary Shelley, letter to Leigh Hunt, 3 Nov. 1823, The Letters of Mary Wollstone
craft Shelley, ed. Betty T. Bennett, 3 vols. (Baltimore, 1980), 1:395-96.
ern science (F, p. 47); the idea of reviving the dead is just a secondary
possibility, and the dead mother comes to his mind only in his nightmare
(see F, p. 53). In the film, however, it is her death that makes him resolve
"to fight ... death itself," and even though his project goes catastrophi-
cally awry, the monster's murder of Elizabeth reanimates this urge ("S,"
p. 45).
Like the monster of the novel, De Niro's monster kills Elizabeth on
her wedding night while Victor is out seeking him with a gun. When
Branagh's Victor returns to find the monster ripping out her heart, he
shoots in vain at her fleeing assailant and then takes her corpse in his
arms. But unlike the Victor of the text, who simply collapses with exhaus-
tion at this point, Branagh's Victor desperately strives to revive Elizabeth
by sewing her now shaven head to the torso of Justine, who (as in the
novel) has been hanged for the murder of little William. After electrically
animating this composite body in the sarcophagus/womb, clothing her in
a wedding dress, and thrusting a wedding ring onto her finger, he begs
her to recognize him, coaxes her to stand, and then waltzes her around
the room, spinning and laughing with her until he sees the monster
standing by the sarcophagus. For the monster, the sight of Elizabeth's
shaven head and sutured body is a Lacanian stade du miroir Seeing at last
a woman whose mutilated form mirrors and thus affirms the humanity
of his own, he says, "She's beautiful," and claims her as his long-promised
mate ("S," p. 132).64 But when Victor's counterclaim leads them to fight
over her, she recoils at once from the men and from the alien body
stitched to her head, and immolates herself with a kerosene lamp.
Students of Mary Shelley's text may find all this merely grotesque or
recklessly sensational. Yet even as it wrenches the plot of the novel, this
sequence exfoliates some of its major themes: Victor's necrophiliac obses-
sion with his dead mother, the contradictions embedded in what Noel
Carroll calls the "overreacher" plot of his ambition to create life from
dead bodies, the monster's desire for a mate, and Victor's unwitting sub-
stitution of Elizabeth for the mate he destroyed.65 Above all, Branagh's
64. He thus reverses the process by which, according to Linda Williams, a woman is
punished for looking at a monster by being made to see his freakishness as a reflection of
her own. See Linda Williams, "When the Woman Looks," in Re-Vision: Essays in Feminist Film
Criticism, ed. Mary Ann Doane, Patricia Mellencamp, and Williams (Los Angeles, 1984), pp.
85-88. Strikingly enough, a real mirror is used to generate a wholly different effect in the
final scenes of the Edison Frankenstein. When the monster enters Victor's bedroom on his
wedding night, he stands before a large mirror and then gradually fades away, leaving only
his reflected image to be seen by Victor when he enters, as if the mirror now showed Victor
his own monstrosity. But gradually the monster's image gives way to that of Victor in his
young manhood-a sign that he has purged himself of monstrosity and can now marry
Elizabeth. For more on the Edison version, which has recently been rediscovered, see
Dixon, "The Films of Frankenstein," pp. 166-69.
65. Noel Carroll, The Philosophy of Horror, or Paradoxes of the Heart (New York, 1990),
p. 118.
film evokes the oedipal conflict between Victor and his creature. In fight-
ing over the reanimated body of Elizabeth, they remind us that Mary
Shelley's Elizabeth was chosen by Victor's dying mother to be not only his
mate but her successor as mother to the Frankenstein family (see F, p.
42). In the "beautiful" body of the sutured Elizabeth, De Niro's monster
briefly finds his own mother and mate.
It is hardly news, of course, that Frankenstein tells the story of an oedi-
pal conflict. But Mary Shelley's Frankenstein helps to show how tightly the
novel knits the Oedipus story to the myths of Prometheus and of Milton's
Satan. Ultimately, Victor's struggle with the creature for possession of
Elizabeth-their would-be mate and mother surrogate-springs from an
ambition at once Promethean and Satanic: the ambition to rival the cre-
ative power of God.66 In Paradise Lost, Satan defies God by claiming to be
"self-begot, self-raised / By our own quickening power" (PL, bk. 5, 11. 860-
61, p. 467), and he begets Sin all by himself, in the very act of conceiving
his rebellion (see PL, bk. 2, 11. 748-61). When Satan's monstrous crea-
ture-literally a monstrum, a "sign / Portentous" (PL, bk. 2, 11. 760-61, p.
394)-excites his incestuous lust, he begets upon her the still more hid-
eous monster of Death, who rapes her and thus impregnates her with the
hellhounds that ceaselessly torment her (see PL, bk. 2, 11. 761-802, pp.
394-95). The story of this unholy trinity is reconfigured in Frankenstein,
where Sin splits into Elizabeth and a monster who plays the role of Death.
But unlike Sin, Elizabeth is not conceived by the Satanic Victor. On the
contrary, she is a rival creator, or rather an instrument in the scheme of
creation conceived by God. That is why Victor exposes her not only to
rape, which Sin undergoes, but death.67
The Branagh film reveals the implications of this point by moving
one step beyond it. If Mary Shelley's Victor can embrace a woman only
after she has turned into a corpse, Branagh's Victor finally seeks a woman
he has created from corpses, a woman who signifies not the divine scheme
of creation and reproduction but his own egomaniacal alternative to it.
What he repeatedly begs of the reanimated Elizabeth is a tribute to him-
self: "Say my name" ("S," p. 130). In contesting Victor's claim on the
woman that he believes had been promised to himself, De Niro's monster
reasserts his right to be treated as God treated Adam. He reasserts, in
other words, the primacy of the divine scheme, which makes mating es-
sential to reproduction.
66. Both Victor and the creature link themselves to Milton's Satan. The creature iden-
tifies himself with "'the fallen angel"' and deliberately echoes his words ("'Evil thenceforth
became my good"') (F, pp. 97, 212; see PL, bk. 4, 1. 110, p. 423). Victor compares himself
to "the archangel who aspired to omnipotence" (F, p. 204).
67. While rape can of course lead to impregnation, it can also serve as a crime against
generation. In recent years, for instance, it has been reported that Bosnian Serbs have
systematically raped Muslim women in order to make them unmarriageable and thus to
eradicate the Muslim population.
we are asked to visualize in our reading are reactions to the sight of the
monster-not the sight itself. We might imagine a film that showed us
nothing more than such reactions. But aside from breaking the promise
implicitly made by all reaction shots-the promise that we will be shown
what provoked them-such a film would fail to show the monster's tor-
tured longing to be sympathetically seen, to be the object of a desiring
gaze.
The monster of the Frankenstein films, above all the Karloff monster
of the Whale films, has in one sense realized this desire beyond his wildest
dreams. Captivating millions, his image has been reproduced and dis-
seminated as widely and as often as the Mona Lisa. But there is a vast
difference between the riveting impact of his picture on a viewing audi-
ence and the repulsiveness of the figure it represents as seen by those
around him. The monster of the screen cannot bask in universal admira-
tion any more than he can relish the scornful laughter of a theater audi-
ence. On screen as in the novel, the monster knows the pitiless gaze of
the other only as the witness to his inescapable monstrosity.
Pictures, we are told, are typically feminine objects consumed by the
male gaze. Yet if a monster seems the very antithesis of a beautiful
woman-whether da Vinci's Gioconda or Victor's doomed bride-he can
nonetheless signify the feminine because he, like women, deviates from
the normative male form.7" The picture of a monster epitomizes this con-
tradiction. Even as it displaces the picture of beauty, its radical deformity
reinscribes both the feminine and the abject, which-in the words ofJulia
Kristeva-"disturbs identity, system, order," and yet also "beseeches, wor-
ries, and fascinates desire."74 The moving picture of a talking monster is
doubly monstrous, for it rends not only the lineaments of beauty but also
the silence traditionally expected of women and pictures alike. In the
end, what is most startling about the Frankenstein films is not that they
make the monster visible but that in most cases they also make him aud-
ible. Subject and object, viewer and viewed, he speaks at once to our eyes
and our ears.
73. "Traditionally," writes Barbara Creed, "the male body has been viewed as norm;
the female body a deviation" (Barbara Creed, "Dark Desires: Male Masochism in the Hor-
ror Film," in Screening the Male: Exploring Masculinities in Hollywood Cinema, ed. Steven Cohan
and Ina Rae Hark [London, 1993], p. 118). Aristotle argued that monstrosity began with
female deviation "from the generic type" (Aristotle, Generation of Animals, trans. A. L. Peck
[Cambridge, Mass., 1953], p. 401 [4.3.767b.9]). See also Huet, Monstrous Imagination, p. 3.
74. Julia Kristeva, Powers of Horror: An Essay on Abjection, trans. Leon S. Roudiez (New
York, 1982), pp. 4, 1. Mitchell has recently argued that insofar as pictures can be personi-
fied, they embody a conflict between the desire to master the beholder and a feminine
sense of abjection; pictures and women, he writes, seek a power "manifested as lack, not as
possession" (Mitchell, "What Do Pictures Really Want?" October, no. 77 [Summer 1996]: 76).
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Critical Inquiry
Jeremy Gilbert-Rolfe
Leaving aside a question to which I'll return, that of the blank stare, it
seems blankness first appeared as the ground for a signification that it
facilitated but that antedated it. According to Meyer Schapiro the smooth
white ground common to most pictorialisms was quite a late develop-
ment.' Blankness, then, was a response to the pictographic rather than
a precondition for it. Cave painters did without or felt no need for an
uninterrupted field, but one later became necessary-the ground ac-
quired the properties of a clear sky-in order that the image could oper-
ate unimpeded by any other presence.
Schapiro makes the point that at first this field is filled with rows of
figures, and then it turns into a rectilinear space with figures in it, which
he tantalizingly analogizes to the walled city. So, in his model, blankness
first comes into view as a space in which the pictograph narrative no
longer has to compete with a ground cluttered with detail and accident,
and then it becomes associated with what one might call a pictorialism of
the finite space, where the smooth white ground is coupled with a limit,
with a dimension and thus a proportion, and, in consequence, with an
overt connection between composition and orientation. The space of the
image now has a figural relationship to its viewer; blankness has invisibly
changed into a kind of space, a metaphor of some sort (an account of the
development of the space of the signifier that makes it be a passage from
1. See Meyer Schapiro, "On Some Problems in the Semiotics of Visual Art: Field and
Vehicle in Image-Signs," Theory and Philosophy of Art: Style, Artist, and Society, vol. 4 of Selected
Papers (New York, 1994), pp. 1-7.
159
2. John Shearman, Only Connect ... Art and the Spectator in the Italian Renaissance
(Princeton, N.J., 1992), p. 27.
3. Richard Beardsworth, Derrida and the Political (London, 1994), pp. 115-16.
out which one can't have the sociocultural considered as an affair of in-
scriptions and fresh starts, history as clearings and beginnings.
with both the beautiful and the sublime, although I'd argue that where
the sublime may be seen to be necessarily inscrutable, for the beautiful
it's just one possible option. If inscrutability has remained a constant fea-
ture of the sublime, in other respects the latter has changed; the terrible
infinity, or obligatory inscrutability, of the sublime is now a property of
technology rather than nature. The contemporary techno-sublime does
not seek to overcome the body by simulating the natural, however, as
Burke saw a repeated loud noise as "capable of the sublime" in that it
brings the listener "just to the verge of pain."4 The new techno-sublime
seeks instead to obviate the body or to redefine it as a face attached to
a pulse.
C6zanne saw the blank-empty and white, blank and blanc-canvas
as already deep, waiting only to be carved out. This is blankness as poten-
tiality waiting to be ordered, as opposed to emptiness waiting to be filled,
so it's no longer the object of a horror vacui. In this respect C6zanne might
be seen as halfway towards a contemporary idea of blankness as a condi-
tion in which something is already happening--halfway because the
depth he saw in the blank canvas was still a depth, tied to human percep-
tion and to the idea of the human as requiring volume.
The whiteness of the canvas signifies preparation, brown linen acti-
vated by white paint. Similarly, without electricity the screen is just the
dead face of an inert object. Turned on it is already active bat can't be
a depth because instantaneity precludes depth to the extent that depth
requires duration for its realization. Carving takes time because it takes
place in space, as it were. A surface, on the other hand, always points in
two directions at once, is by definition an interstitial condition and is in
that sense both instantaneous and not spatial. These are the terms, I
think, in which one may think of blankness as an active signifier, and as
signifying kinds of activity, in the contemporary context, and in which the
late twentieth century has available to it the possibility of blankness as an
activity, something happening now, as opposed to a condition that can
only point to a beginning or an end. Electronic blankness occurs as event
rather than eschatology, as a quality making possible any progression of
properties.
As an event running through any narrative it may frame, the appear-
ance and function of blankness in objects and signs-like computers and
the image of the body offered by fashion--suggests a comparison and
convergence between, as it were, being and the sign, which might be use-
ful here. Anthropomorphize blankness and it goes to the idea of the im-
passive; analogize it to language and it becomes a beginnihg and an end.
As the property of a face it complicates communication, symbolically
precluding communication by communicating incommunicativeness.
4. Edmund Burke, A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and
the Beautiful, ed. Adam Phillips (1757; Oxford, 1990), p. 127.
As far as the sublime is concerned, one may say that the Victorian
scene presented a mechanical complexity which meant to be awesome but
now perhaps seems comforting, particularly when decayed, in compari-
son with the passive-aggressive blankness of the contemporary. In con-
trast to that, being able to see how things work is reassuring however
overwhelming they may be. It seems touching to us that the Victorians
should think that they could symbolically control the industrial by cov-
ering its products with pictures and architectural details depicting plants.
The effect created by the nineteenth-century's decoration of the mechani-
cal with references to the preindustrial, the gothic and the classical in
particular and the organic-the natural-in general, is in practice ironic:
Schiller's gothic as the facade of that which eliminates nature altogether,
or Ruskin's nostalgia for the gothic as amelioration of that to which it was
opposed. It was a visible world as ours is not. Victorian decoration always
accompanied a mechanism whose operation could be seen; both it and
what it ameliorated were present to vision. Where for us the absence of
decoration embellishes the absence of visible articulation. The steam en-
gine's smoke was always egregiously and triumphally visible, especially
from far away, as in any image of a train puffing its away through En-
gland's verdant vales and fields or across the prairies of the American
West. The jet airliner on the other hand seems to me quite different.
From afar one can't see any visible signs of locomotion. High in the sky it
seems to move soundlessly and enigmatically, driven by an exhaust im-
perceptible at that distance. Only when, through the terminal window
whose heavy glass preserves a relative soundlessness, one sees an airliner
taxiing, does one notice that as it passes by them objects behind its jet
stream become wavy images of themselves, dissolved in a translucent
stream of poison. In the nineteenth century pollution was maximally vis-
ible, soot everywhere. In the twentieth it is in contrast minimally appar-
ent, the subtler but equally deadly fumes of the internal combustion
engine: Manchester covered with soot; Los Angeles suspended in a deli-
cate biliously green haze.
5. In this connection I have suggested elsewhere that the electronic renders all de-
grees of solidity equally insubstantial. See my "Cabbages, Raspberries, and Video's Thin
Brightness," Art and Design 11 (May-June 1996): 14-23.
face rather than what is said to lie behind it precisely because, paradoxi-
cally, the model that one would now require would not and could not be
a visual one, and could not be because of its origin in an idea of instanta-
neity-movement without perceivable time and therefore without space:
the face as an interface, transmission and reception together on a plane
of convergence. Garbo's face may have been a tabula rasa, just as a sheet
of paper may be seen to be empty, but not so the contemporary model's
face and not so the computer screen when it's turned on (figs. 1 and 2).
In both cases one is in the presence of a blankness that is a mobility, active
rather than awaiting action. Perhaps one could say that insofar as faces
are mobile by definition and pages not, technology, having come to be
characterized by instantaneity and having substituted the electronic page
for the one made out of rag or wood pulp and only capable of being
inscribed from outside itself, through the application of an entirely differ-
ent material, has managed to attribute the properties of the one to the
other.
What is signified is nonvisual in the sense that it's not tactile. In the
sense that Merleau-Ponty describes the Cartesian concept of vision as be-
ing modeled on a sense of touch, the electronic surface of the video
screen presents a non-Cartesian action that is not conceivable as action
between forms.6 This condition, to which the facial arrangement of con-
temporary fashion models aspires, is neither the absence of expression
nor a particular expression, but the possibility of expression in the sense
of a presentation of the conditions of expression. This is one sense in
which blankness is more easily described as an excess than as an absence
in the contemporary situation. What it exceeds is the visual conceived as
a matter of forms.
There are no such things as blank forms, while there clearly is such
a thing as a blank surface. A smooth surface can be blank, but a smooth
form is still a shape, with a figural relationship to an at least implicit field
and all that that implies. Blankness itself eludes the tactile; Descartes's
blind subject is always touching something or failing to find anything to
touch. This is the visual as outsides that must have insides and that finds
its contemporary expression in the putatively anti-Cartesian Lacanianism
of the stain and the blind spot, a Hegelian symptomology of the limits of
the tactile and the visual. And it's also the sense in which the face can
only be blank because it's an array of mobilities on a surface, the front
part of the head as opposed to the head itself. The face is the place where
the body interfaces with everything its face faces.
I have mentioned Bergson and have in mind the Bergsonianism
identified or invented by Deleuze, of a continuity between outsides predi-
6. See Maurice Merleau-Ponty, "Eye and Mind," trans. Carleton Dallery, The Primacy
of Perception and Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and
Politics, trans. Dallery et al., ed. James M. Edie (Evanston, Ill., 1964), p. 170.
?~ . . .. i ? ..,
........... .."..
U. g?.;;
..... 1 -M'.
mma:
n~:r
AU, UNMI
..........: . .... ...........:::::::::::: . . . ..:; .Li:: :.,]. .0 : . . . .?. . . . .. . . ... .. .i . . =?= m'ili?):
U;??
?:g -g,
X -g
mml~iiii ilal~liIiii,
. ... ..
6x:
cated on the idea of the surface-the plane and the point-as opposed
to the form-the shape and its interior. These would be the terms in
which the active blankness I've sought to invoke here might be seen as a
necessary response to what technology has, equally necessarily, produced.
The substitution of becoming-electronic for becoming-animal is conceiv-
ably a logical consequence of modernism's transparent humanism. As
has been remarked elsewhere, in Against Nature des Esseintes describes a
blond who becomes a race horse that turns out to be a railway locomo-
tive.7 The Victorians, perhaps because of being alert to the animality that
lay behind or below the rational mechanism that their technology per-
suaded them was their consciousness, were able to see machines and the
"machinic" as animal bodies and movements. No one can see the contem-
porary context as such, but it does seem possible to see it as made out of
faces rather than bodies, of surfaces containing instantaneous mobility
rather than bodies articulated through times. Video's capacity to morph
one image into another, beloved by children and American politicians,
makes the point over and over again that the face belongs to technology,
but the face remains a form. A surface is a face but not necessarily a form,
and it is its freedom from form that gives it its instantaneity.
It was one of the chief instruments in freeing the world from the
domination of physical force, and placing the various orders of soci-
ety on a level. With the distinction between the weapons they used,
vanished also that between lords and serfs. And before gunpowder
fortified places were no longer impregnable, so that strongholds and
castles now lose their importance.8
In, as it were, not quite the same spirit, perhaps this may be rephrased
as follows: Capitalism needed, for its objects and the subjects who would
mold themselves around them, an exterior at once receptive and ex-
pressive, and technology produced one forthwith. It was one of the chief
instruments in that substitution of passive aggression for physical force
that is the triumph of the market over politics. With the distinction be-
tween speeds of access abolished, it also caused the distinction between
7. See J.-K. Huysmans, Against Nature, trans. Robert Baldick (Harmondsworth, 1959),
p. 37.
8. G. W. F. Hegel, Philosophy of History, trans. J. Sibree (Buffalo, 1991), p. 402.
9. Jacques Derrida, Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and the
New International, trans. Peggy Kamuf (London, 1994), p. 54.
but to speed. With regard to both speed in the streamlined object and
clarity in the world of video one recognizes blankness as a property of the
surface that has to be flawless, and therefore cannot be said to present
blankness as symptomatic of any kind of lack.
This is why I'd say that the contemporary is an inversion of the tradi-
tional relationship between blankness and transparency and impassivity.
Norman Bryson, talking about David's uninflected brush work, describes
it as a transparent signifier vulnerable to discursive control on account of
the absence of gesture.'" This is the uninflected as the official style, and
Bryson's point is well taken. But I wonder if the reverse isn't true in the
age of the photograph and the photographically instantaneous. The
selfless lack of gesture of which Bryson speaks may after all be that be-
cause one recognizes in it the effacement of a self and the absence of
the gesture that would articulate it. But these were never there in the
photograph. In such a context perhaps one could suggest that it is the
uninflected which always resists direction, while the inflected can always
be qualified by connotation and thus rendered subordinate to, or an ef-
fect of, what it is said to connote. This might suggest that the absence of
visible mediation is a challenge to a hermeneutics of bodily recognition,
that that in which the human is least apparent-because it was never
there-is by definition that which is finally out of the human's control:
inscrutability as the absence of putative empathy, the conversion of the
trace from nature to technology.
Perhaps one might say that the transparent signifier is vulnerable to
discursive control until you stare at it for a long time, when, having begun
to concentrate on its impassivity, one can think about its indifference to
what controls it. It may be controlled by a specific discourse, but that's
only because it may be controlled by any other discourse, too, which
could imply that in that it provides a ground for that to which it is said
to be subordinate the relationship is in fact not one of subordination and
the subordinated, and is predicated on the opposite of transparency.
As I understand it the idea of the interface, like Deleuze's Bergsoni-
anism, precludes the transparent because it has no need of the layer. The
surface does not give way to what supports it; it is, if anything, extraskele-
tal and needs no support from within or behind. This is one reason why
the visual, as a matter of the spatial, has to disappear along with the body
as an articulation in time. It's a commonplace that the visual arts are at
some level never visual; because they're about the visual-an idea of the
visual, the experience of the visual-they can't entirely be what they're
about. So in the visual arts we expect to see the nonvisual components of
the visual clearly laid out and, as it were, in our face. My observations
here have been about the extent to which a similar possibility has spilled
10. See Norman Bryson, Word and Image: French Painting of the Ancien Regime (Cam-
bridge, 1981), p. 238.
over into a ubiquitous aspect of daily life. Insofar as I've put forward an
argument, it's that the absence of a mask is also a mask. The nun's cowl
announces what she is, its absence hides her true identity. Which brings
me to blankness as singularity.
The ornate grandiosity of the Victorian railway terminus was meant
to astonish and therein lay its sublimity. Burke described astonishment as
related to that terror whose object is the sublime and describes it as the
highest sensation on a sliding scale that runs from there down through
"awe, reverence, and respect.""11 It is not, he says, a positive pleasure.
Leaving aside the appalling way in which Burke's desperate masculinism
obliges him to insist by implication that one can't be astonished by the
beautiful, I want to suggest that the sublime proposed by contemporary
technology may be terrifying, but it is couched in terms as far away from
astonishment, awe, reverence, and respect as it can get. It is instead a
sublimity lodged in an idea of the same as a condition of the singular. It's
a user-friendly sublime. But it is nonetheless a sublime, marked as such
by its otherness. Just as the face can't not signify, so that there will by now
be a developing tradition of blank expressions, so too the computer as an
object can't not have an attitude to design properties, to the world of the
tactile and the visual. As objects, electronic devices benefit from having
little pretechnological history; what they do was by and large just not
done before they did it. The television may have replaced the radio but
the radio didn't replace something else. Electronic communication en-
tered the house as something that could be put on the shelf, then trans-
formed itself into an independent piece of furniture, the television. It, in
turn, disguised itself as a kind of sideboard, with fake wood and sliding
doors, such as one still finds in American hotels, which labor under the
delusion that being reminded of the fifties makes everybody comfortable.
But television has since progressively transformed itself into a rounded
black thing, molded rather than constructed, unlike anything else in the
domestic interior except the telephone. Plastic objects gesture towards
one another across rooms filled with references to the once handmade,
offering access in both directions, genealogically divorced from the inte-
rior whose irreversible penetration by and continuity with what was once
an outside they represent. My mother recently had to buy a new television
and was first alarmed that she couldn't get one with doors and subse-
quently put out that she couldn't even put a few flowers on top of the
ones she could buy because they were rounded and postangular. Such
objects are by design as well as volition at once at hand and irretrievably
apart. One has only to add that the latest sales triumph in the electronics
world has to do with putting computers and fax machines in rounded
black casings instead of the grey, more angular ones, which have been the
11. Burke, A Philosophical Enquiry into the Origin of Our Ideas of the Sublime and the Beauti-
ful, p. 123.
norm and which clearly referred to things like metal file cabinets. A sym-
bolic equation of the office with the home, of work and what gives relief
from it, performed within the language of that which cuts across both,
obviates both, proposes a world in which there's no necessary distinction
between them. The performance, it should be noted, is by objects that
are extruded and molded rather than constructed, things with skins, em-
bodiments that need make no reference to the organic.
For the visual arts the technological in its current form presents the
same problem, if in other terms, offered by the body when it is under-
stood as a zone of intensification rather than revelation. The task is to
make the technological visible; the trouble is that it already is. Manet saw
it coming. The world could make more meaning as a flat image than a
fat thing. Not only flat, but approximated. The national standard for
color video in the States is known by the initials NTRC. No one knows
what they stand for, but they are remembered by the phrase "never the
right color." These are the colors that all clothes, cars, toys, and foodstuffs
nowadays strive to imitate.
One could certainly divide the visual arts over the past twenty-five
years into those where people work with blankness and those where
people cover it up. One category is a response to the demands of the
sublime, another to the narratives technology makes possible. The last
fifteen years have largely been dominated by art of the latter sort, social
realism represented as pop piety or conventionalized transgression. One
could see it coming when, in the late seventies, artists and critics of the
more literal and sentimental sort started to vociferously denounce what
they called and still call blank abstraction. And despite its detractors' ma-
licious intent, it was indeed abstraction's blankness that was at issue. Mini-
malism, the last popular abstract style, was all about blankness, but in a
rather neoclassical sort of way; blankness attached to greyness; colorless-
ness as sobriety and the serious; the art object as a product above all of
drawing, which is to say of the idea. In this sense it too was as nostalgic
for form as all the retro piety that has replaced it. It may have been the
last moment in which blankness stood for absence, for form giving way
to the pure idea.
Abstraction itself, if that's the right word for it (I prefer the term
nonrepresentation, which frees it from a prior allegiance to a form), has
for some time now clearly been struggling with the transmutation of the
sublime from the space of unbounded nature to that of an uncontrollable
technology. In the course of this struggle it has lost the implacable and
blank as resources peculiar to the work of art (these are now common-
place), nor can it claim to own the idea of a world of surfaces, for such is
the technological world that has taken over the world as such. This is the
dilemma first spelled out in Lyotard's essays on Barnett Newman and the
sublime, where I first found the problem of the instantaneous posed as
12. Jean-Frangois Lyotard, "The Sublime and the Avant-Garde," The Inhuman, trans.
Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby (Stanford, Calif., 1991), p. 93.
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1344163?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Critical Inquiry
The following essay is composed of two parts. In the first I trace the gene-
alogy of a literary image. In the second I relate it to the Vietnam Veterans
Memorial wall, which is one of the most visited and, some would say,
most stirring monument in America. My intention is not to "explain" the
emotive power of the wall, only to provide a particular perspective on it.
I neither fought in the Vietnam War nor lost anyone in it who was close
to me. I do not presume to share the grief of those who did. But as they
say in Latin: homo sum; humani nil a me alienum puto. The memorial, insofar
as it is human, is not alien to any of us.
Si sta come
d'autunno
sugli alberi
le foglie
Literally translated:
One is as
in autumn
176
on the trees
the leaves.'
"Who among mortal men are you, good friend? Since never
before have I seen you in the fighting where men win glory,
yet now you have come striding far out in front of all others
in your great heart, who have dared stand up to my spear far-
shadowing.
Yet unhappy are those whose sons match warcraft against me."2
In essence, Diomedes wants to be sure that his foe is a mortal and not a
god in disguise. By asking him to identify himself he is asking not only
1. Giuseppe Ungaretti, "Soldati," Vita d'un uomo: Tutte le poesie (Milan, 1967), p. 87;
my translation.
2. Homer, The Iliad, trans. Richmond Lattimore (Chicago, 1952), bk. 6, 11. 123-27, p.
156; hereafter abbreviated I.
about his family lineage but also about his "generation," in the sense of
his genesis or genus (mortal or immortal).3 The reply he receives suggests
that his antagonist is not only human but knows what it means not to be
a god:
This warrior may have bravely separated himself off from the crowd, yet
he speaks here as an indifferent member of his species, aware of the futil-
ity of distinctions among men, all of whom share a common mortal fate
precisely by virtue of their "generation." Why ask of my generation when
my generation is human?
The answer to that question is to be sought perhaps in the question
itself. Ludwig Feuerbach, for example, in the opening paragraphs of The
Essence of Christianity, claims that what distinguishes humans from animals
is that we take cognisance of ourselves not merely as individuals but as a
species. We ask of our generation because it is our nature to take cogni-
sance of our nature:
3. The Greek word for family, lineage, and generation is the same: genea. The word
genos refers to an extended clan.
4. Ludwig Feuerbach, The Essence of Christianity, trans. George Eliot (New York, 1957),
pp. 1-2.
give king to Lykia), and that Bellerophontes' wife bore him three
children-Isandros, Hippolochos, and Laodameia. Laodameia lay with
Zeus and gave birth to Sarpedon, king of the Lykians.
Never once does the Lykian disclose his name to Diomedes. To the query,
"Who among mortal men are you?" the answer is, "Such is my generation
and the blood I claim to be born from." Glaukos's identity is proudly
reducible to his descendancy. This goes for his so-called moral selfhood
as well, for here is a man whose principle motivation is not to shame "the
generation of my fathers." His act of "coming out ahead of the others" on
the battlefield fulfills his father's injunctions to "hold my head above oth-
ers." In that sense Glaukos is happy and even eager to derive his identity
from his family and kin, his genea and genos.
Listening to Glaukos retrace his ancestry, Diomedes realizes to his
delight that there exists a connection between them, for Bellerophontes
was once a guest in the house of Diomedes' grandfather Oineus. The two
of them had exchanged gifts of friendship. Diomedes proposes to
Glaukos that they venerate this legacy, embrace one another as friends,
and vow to avoid one another henceforth on the field of war. He even pro-
poses that they exchange their armor, "'so that these others may know /
how we claim to be guests and friends from the days of our fathers"' (I,
bk. 6, 11. 230-31, p. 159). Recognition gets the better of anonymity as two
strangers on opposite sides of the war's divide discover a bond that runs
deeper than the circumstance that pits them against one another. Thus
in a sublimely ironic fashion the episode as a whole belies Glaukos's pre-
amble about the impersonality of the human generations. Here it is pre-
cisely their "generations," or genealogies, that turn foes into friends.
Or so it would seem. We will never know if Diomedes was telling
the truth about the connection between Bellerophontes and Oineus, or
whether he had all the while been eyeing Glaukos's splendid armor and
plotting a strategy by which to possess himself of it:
but Zeus the son of Kronos stole away the wits of Glaukos
who exchanged with Diomedes the son of Tydeus armour
of gold for bronze, for nine oxen's worth the worth of a hundred.
[I, bk. 6, 11. 234-36, p. 159]
Diomedes was, after all, a Greek-no more to be trusted than the wife of
the king of Argos, Anteia, who, spurned by Bellerophontes the blameless,
falsely accused him of attempting to lie with her.
Glaukos's simile-"'As is the generation of leaves, so is that of hu-
manity"-is one of the most poignant and lyrical in all of Homer, evoking
not only the general caducity of the human condition but also an analogy
between the falling of leaves and the falling of soldiers on the battlefield,
an analogy condensed and intensified in Ungaretti's "Soldati." Yet let us
not assume that Glaukos proclaims such wisdom wistfully, as if to imply
the vanity of earthly glory (or golden armor). That the generations suc-
ceed one another like leaves on a tree-such is the order of things. It is
natural, it is good, it is as it should be. Despite the lyricism of the passage,
therefore, the simile of the leaves is essentially epic in its import, by which
I mean that it speaks not for or as the single individual but for or as
the collective. It speaks, in other words, of a communal destiny-what
Heidegger calls Dasein's Geschick as opposed to its Schicksal.5
When Virgil takes up the Homeric image of the generation of leaves
in book 6 of The Aeneid, the context is at once more ominous and more
rueful than in The Iliad, for we are now no longer among the living but
among the dead. Aeneas has just begun his descent into the gloomy
depths of Hades. One of the first scenes he witnesses is that of a "multi-
tude" of recently arrived shades swarming toward the shores of the Styx,
which they must cross in order to gain their designated place in the un-
derworld. Those who have been properly buried and mourned will be
ferried across by old man Charon. The others must wait.
never made it into the autumn of their years. One has a sense here of an
underworld congested with the dead, an unnatural excess made up
mostly of innocent victims cut down in their prime. There is something
in Virgil's version that is lacking in its Homeric counterpart, namely, the
scandal of death. In Homer the simile serves to naturalize the human
generations. In Virgil, the correspondence between humanity and the
natural order seems troubled and compromised, as if to suggest that the
injustice by which death takes its toll among the living is hardly "natural,"
or that, if this be nature's justice, human justice remains unreconciled to
it. In both Homer and Virgil the simile speaks of the generic nature of
human generations, but by elaborating on the image-what with the
thickness of the leaves, the autumnal forest and the early frost-Virgil
almost overdetermines it. While Homer emphasizes the successive nature
of the seasons, that is, the succession of death by life ("'so one generation
of men will grow while another dies"'), Virgil dwells only on the season
of death. These leaves do not grow and die. They only fall in the autumn's
"early frost." It is almost as if Virgil makes of the dead the genus of which
we the living are only a species.
The notion that life is a form of living death is not foreign to Virgil.
Think of the famous pietas of Aeneas. This piety is sacrificial and oppres-
sive, a mark of the servitude that enslaves the living to the dead. Homer's
Glaukos is pious toward his fathers, to be sure, but with an exuberance
not to be found in the sullen, necrocratic universe of Virgil, where the
burden of the generations weighs heavily on the individual, interring him
prematurely. One could even argue that only because Aeneas is already
dead-in the sense that his piety subjects his life to the will of the ances-
tors-is he able to descend into the underworld and commune with the
shades of the deceased. That descent, and Aeneas's mission to found the
future city of Rome, are the matter of Virgil's Aeneid, whose epic vocation
is to exalt and commemorate Rome's grandiose destiny. But Virgil knew,
and his poem registers the fact, that Rome's destiny exacted untold inno-
cent victims, only some of whose unredeemed shades Aeneas encounters
on the shores of the Styx. It was not without reason that the medievals
believed that Virgil was at bottom a proto-Christian who despaired of the
earthly city but was born too early to find rescue in the doctrine of the
city of God-the only truly eternal and universal city, according to Saint
Augustine. ("The Rome in which Christ is Roman," Dante calls it in Purga-
torio. )7
As is the generation of leaves, so too is that of this simile. From Virgil
it is passed on to Dante. We come across it in canto 3 of the Inferno, on
the banks of the Acheron, where a multitude of souls, as in book 6 of The
7. Dante, Purgatory, trans. Mandelbaum (New York, 1980), canto 32, 11. 102-3, p. 102.
In Homer the leaves are likened to the human generations in their suc-
cession; in Virgil, they are likened to the shades of the dead; in Dante,
they are likened to the damned. Damnation explains the agglutination of
descent imagery in the two tercets: autumn, the detaching of leaves, the
"fallen garments," the seed of Adam (that is, the fall from Eden as well as
the descendancy of humankind from that first ancestor), the descent of
the souls from the shoreline, and finally the image of the falcon descend-
ing from the air at the call of the falconer. Yet surely the most conspicuous
aspect of Dante's version is his individuation of the falling leaves-"first
one and then the other"-corresponding to the shades who "descended
from the shoreline one by one." By insisting on the singularity of each leaf
(or sinner) Dante in effect reminds us that every individual who comes of
age in the Christian era chooses, and does not merely suffer, his or her
posthumous fate. Whereas Virgil evokes a multitude of "innocent" dead
on the banks of the Styx-boys, unwed girls, and high-hearted heroes-
the shades on Dante's river bank are the engineers of their own damna-
tion, for each is (or in life was) endowed with individual free will.
In other words, in God's providential dispensation there is no more
tragedy. The Christian era is that of comedy, in the sense of a story (or
history) that ends happily for those who choose to accept God's free
grace.9 The legacy of original sin is still with us, our nature is still corrupt,
and we still have an inborn tendency to sin, yet the event of the Incarna-
tion has opened the possibility of expiation in and through the person of
Jesus Christ. This redemption, however, is not general. As Saint Au-
gustine makes clear in his The City of God, expiation can take place only
in the individual, not in the race as a whole: "This offence [original sin]
was committed when all mankind existed in one man, and it brought
universal ruin on mankind; and no one can be rescued from the toils of
8. Dante, Inferno, trans. Mandelbaum (New York, 1980), canto 3, 11. 112-17, p. 27.
9. For a fuller treatment of this topic, and the meaning of the title of Dante's poem,
see my essay "Comedy and Modernity: Dante's Hell," MLN 102 (Dec. 1987): 1043-61, and
Giorgio Agamben, "Comedia: La svolta comica di Dante e la concezione della colpa," Para-
gone 346 (Dec. 1978): 1-19.
10. Saint Augustine, The City of God, trans. Henry Bettenson (Harmondsworth, 1972),
bk. 14, chap. 20, p. 582.
that offence, which was punished by God's justice, unless the sin is expi-
ated in each man singly by the grace of God."' When it comes to expiation,
each man is all mankind existing in one man. Each man is Adam. The
individual has become a universal. This is the providential meaning of
Christ's incarnate personhood.
It has been remarked that the Inferno is full of damned souls whose
powerful portraits as individuals show that Dante's theology is frequently
at odds with his all-too-human passions." I believe, on the contrary, that
the dramatic individuation, if not individualism, of his infernal characters
accords well with a theology that puts so much of the burden on the
individual's free will. Again, this is not to say that human beings are liber-
ated from a common genealogy that links them all to Adam's seed; it
means that the advent of Christ has liberated a space of freedom in the
interiority of the individual. Whether one calls it the soul, the conscience,
the moral self-it is in each case as singular as the leaves that fall "first
one and then the other," or the shades who descend to the river "one
by one."
No one would approve more of Dante's gesture of singularizing the
falling leaves of autumn than the Christian philosopher Leibniz, whose
entire metaphysics represents a sustained attempt to think the notion of
identity in terms of singularities. His "principle of the identity of indis-
cernables" holds that no two things in the universe can be exactly alike,
since identity excludes a priori the possibility of something being identical
to anything but itself, not only because two or more things cannot occupy
the same spatiotemporal position but because in God's rational universe
there is no sufficient reason for them to be identical. Identity is in each
case singular. To illustrate his point, Leibniz offers an example reminis-
cent of Dante's simile in canto 3 of the Inferno, though that canto was
certainly the last thing Leibniz had in mind when he recounts the follow-
ing anecdote in New Essays Concerning Human Understanding:
The example every school child learns, or at least used to learn, for
such generic diversity is, not leaves, but snowflakes. If it was true then, I
11. See Erich Auerbach, "Farinata and Cavalcante," Mimesis: The Representation of Real-
ity in Western Literature, trans. Willard R. Trask (Princeton, N.J., 1953), pp. 174-202.
12. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibnitz, New Essays Concerning Human Understanding, trans. Al-
fred Gideon Langley (Chicago, 1916), bk. 2, chap. 27, par. 3, pp. 239-40; trans. mod.
presume it is still true now that no two snowflakes have ever fallen to
earth which are exactly alike. The crystal form of each flake is unique.
This quotidian generation of infinite singularities is a wonder to contem-
plate, lending credence to more than Leibniz's principle of the identity of
indiscernables (the hypothesis of God, for instance, which becomes less
and less absurd the more one learns about the natural world). In any case
it is in terms of this relation between the individuality of the flakes and
the generic blanket of snow which they form when they accumulate on
the ground that I have always been tempted to make sense of the epipha-
nic ending of James Joyce's story, "The Dead." Let us turn for a moment
to that ending, one of the most famous in modern fiction.
Upon returning with his wife Gretta to the hotel room after the din-
ner party at his aunts' house, Gabriel Conroy is chilled to the bone to
learn that in her youth Gretta was loved by a boy who had "died for her."
(The boy, leaving his sickbed one cold and rainy night, had come to her
window to tell her he did not want to live without her, dying shortly there-
after.) The ghostly resurrection of Michael Furey in his wife's memory
that evening (thanks to a song) opens an unbridgeable distance between
her and Gabriel, precisely at the moment when he feels an unusual urge
to draw close to her. After she falls asleep in the grief of her memory,
Gabriel lies awake thinking about the boy who died in his seventeenth
year, and about his wife, himself, his aunts, and all the people he knows
and does not know who slowly but surely are on their way toward becom-
ing dead. The story ends with a vision:
A few light taps upon the pane made him turn to the window. It had
begun to snow again. He watched sleepily the flakes, silver and dark,
falling obliquely against the lamplight. The time had come for him
to set out on his journey westward. Yes, the newspapers were right:
snow was general all over Ireland. It was falling on every part of the
dark central plain, on the treeless hills, falling softly upon the Bog of
Allen and, farther westward, softly falling into the dark mutinous
Shannon waves. It was falling, too, upon every part of the lonely
churchyard on the hill where Michael Furey lay buried. It lay thickly
drifted on the crooked crosses and headstones, on the spears of the
little gate, on the barren thorns. His soul swooned slowly as he heard
the snow falling faintly through the universe and faintly falling, like
the descent of their last end, upon all the living and the dead.'3
Unlike the images of autumn leaves I have reviewed so far, the snow
here is not a simile but a symbol. A clause in the last sentence-"like
the descent of their last end"-invites us to associate it with the condition
of human mortality. This snow, "falling faintly through the universe,"
evokes, among other things, an idea of the vast accumulation of the dead
13. James Joyce, "The Dead," Dubliners (Harmondsworth, 1967), pp. 223-24.
2. The Wall
Since that day the Vietnam Veterans Memorial has become one of
the most visited monuments in America, along with the Lincoln Memo-
rial. On any given day, in the crushing heat of summer or in the dead of
winter, one can witness the same cathartic scene taking place before the
wall. Much of it has to do with the unresolved tensions associated with
the Vietnam War and the long-overdue need for a public mourning pro-
cess, no doubt, but there is also something about the solemn gravity of
the wall's symbol-the encrypted presence of its dead-which seems to
turn the deaths of those memorialized into a stubborn question. The si-
lence with which it responds to this question gives the wall's black granite
stone an almost overwhelming power of withholding. The irresistible
need many visitors feel to touch an inscribed name, kiss it, talk to it, offer
it flowers or gifts, leave it notes or letters is evidence enough of the dead's
privative presence in the stone-a presence at once given and denied.
To the depths of silence with which the wall responds to its own ques-
tion correspond the depths of its symbolic underworld. In structure and
form the wall evokes an implacable descent, built as it is below the ground
level of the park. A highly charged irony pervades its structural simplicity.
The wall is boldly finite in its spatial dimensions, yet its triangulated plane
extends to infinity. It has a clear beginning, middle, and end, yet every
name in the chronological sequence lies at an absolute end. Maybe that
is why all the names seem to gravitate toward or explode out of the corner
where the wall forms a sharp angle. This highest part of the wall is also
the lowest point of the descending pathway and marks the first and last
deaths of the war. Here, where the wall peaks and forms a sharp angle,
drawing all the lateral names into its somber recess, the names of the
dead seem to rain down from a sublime height. Even those at the very
bottom of the slabs seem to have fallen to the ground from on high. As it
reaches a peak and then begins to descend, the line of the wall evokes the
"natural" progress of a human life, from growth to maturity to decline.
Yet the average age of the combat soldier in Vietnam was nineteen.
One's initial impression of the memorial wall from a distance is that
of its dramatic horizontal extension, yet as one descends along the path-
way toward the highest part of the wall the anxiety of the vertical gradu-
ally wins out over that of the horizontal stretch to infinity. Joyce's image
of the snow, by contrast, works the other way around. The verticality of
the snow's descent gives way, by the end of the last paragraph of The Dead,
to a more sublime impression of its vast horizontal extension over all of
Ireland. Yet the effect in both cases is similar. The tense relationship be-
tween extension and descension gives both symbols their sublime epic
reach.
stone's texture. When one realizes that they are not texture but the names
of the dead inscribed along the entire stretch of the wall, one is struck by
the sheer profusion that characterizes this class of veterans who met their
death in Vietnam. One gets an impression of Virgil's vast hosts of the dead
in their incalculable numbers, or of the legions of shades that inspired in
Dante's pilgrim the famous line, "I had not thought death had undone
so many." When we speak of 59,000 dead, that is a crushing figure even
in its abstraction. But allow their names to occupy space and suddenly
the "so many" undone by the war find a measure for their immoderate
excess.
14. The idea of a monument that would feature the names of all the men and women
who never made it back from Vietnam we owe, not to Maya Ying Lin, the wall's designer,
but to Jan Scruggs, who founded the Vietnam Veterans' Memorial Fund in 1979. Every
design submitted to the nationwide contest had to meet this condition of a complete listing
of the names of the dead and missing. For an inspired meditation on names, memorials,
and the dead, see Peter S. Hawkins, "Naming Names: The Art of Memory and the NAMES
Project AIDS Quilt," Critical Inquiry 19 (Summer 1993): 752-79.
While it is clearly symbolic, the wall defies the most traditional defi-
nition of the symbol. In The Statesman's Manual Coleridge famously affirms
that the symbol is characterized by "a translucence of the special in the
individual, or of the general in the special, or the universal in the gen-
eral."'15 This is a compelling definition and one that works well in the case
of the generic Tomb of the Unknown Soldier. The (unidentified) soldier
buried in such tombs "symbolizes" all the known and unknown soldiers
who died in a given war and, more generally, all the soldiers who died in
battle on behalf of that nation and, more universally, the soldiers of all
nations who have lost-and who in the future will lose-their lives in
war. The symbolism of the Vietnam memorial wall works the other way
around. We see an almost endless list of names of "known" soldiers who
make up a (special or general) class. But in this case it is the individual
who shines in and through the generic multitude of names. The epic
ambition to monumentalize the Vietnam War in the memorial wall comes
to grief in the lyric singularity of each and every name. This failure of
the epic gesture is deliberate, and it accounts for the wall's astonishing
solemnity. The translucence of the individual in the general, embodied
in the reflective surface of the stone itself, makes of the wall a contrarian
symbol, or a symbol of contrariness. In that sense it is an appropriate
memorial for a war that, at bottom, was a civil war-a war at odds with
its own concept.
When the project for the memorial wall was first announced, many
veterans protested its conception and considered it another insult to their
dignity. They called it "the black gash of shame." They had expected
something more in keeping with other war memorials. They expected
and demanded to be honored the way their fathers and grandfathers had
been honored in previous wars. These were the Glaukos types, eager to
follow their fathers' injunctions, eager for a patriotic monument that
would finally authorize their pride for having served in the Vietnam War.
To placate them, a bronze statue of three anonymous soldiers was com-
missioned and placed near the wall. These three soldiers, in their generic
status, are evidence of just how pathetic a conventional symbolism ap-
pears in this context. The suggestion of heroic patriotism and comraderie
rings, if not false, then fatuous-an idol that Nietzsche's hammer would
have found hollow and deceiving. For the Vietnam War was not like other
patriotic wars. On the contrary, it shattered the very concept of a patriotic
war. How do you memorialize that?
The names on the Vietnam Veterans Memorial wall are the signa-
tures of a generation that many believe was betrayed by its fathers, fathers
15. Quoted in M. H. Abrams, A Glossary of Literary Terms, 4th ed. (New York, 1981), s.v.
"symbol." See Samuel Taylor Coleridge, The Statesman's Manual, in Lay Sermons, ed. R. J.
White, vol. 6 of The Collected Works of Samuel Taylor Coleridge, ed. Kathleen Coburn and Bart
Winer (Princeton, N.J., 1972), p. 30.
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1344164?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Critical Inquiry
Jeffrey T. Schnapp
1. Modern Matters
An abridged early draft of this essay appeared under the title "Canto della materia I:
Il rayon e i tessuti autarchici," Annuario di Estetica 1995, ed. Stefano Zecchi (Bologna, 1996),
pp. 211-42. I would like to express my gratitude to Luce Marinetti-Barbi and the Getty
Research Institute for granting their permission to publish an English translation of an
unpublished early draft of E T. Marinetti's "Simultaneous Poem of Woven Light" (see ap-
pendix). Unless otherwise indicated, all translations are my own.
191
1. The full passage reads: "Man tends to soil matter with his youthful joy or old pain,
matter which possesses an admirably sustained drive towards greater ardor, greater move-
ment, a greater subdivision of itself. Matter is neither sad nor happy. Its essence is courage,
willpower, absolute force" (F T. Marinetti, "Manifesto tecnico della letteratura futurista,"
Teoria e invenzionefuturista, ed. Luciano De Maria [Milan, 1983], pp. 51-52).
2. Maxime Du Camp, "A Charles Lambert," Chants de la matiere, in Les Chants modernes
(1855; Paris, 1860), p. 170; hereafter abbreviated "ACL."
So modernity's song of matter is not the song of history. Nor does it con-
sist in that disengaged and ornamental form of creation that Du Camp's
contemporaries and successors referred to with disdain as "mere art" or
"mere literature." Rather, the artwork is at once a work in progress and a
vehicle for work and progress. It provides the visual/verbal counterpart to
industry's alchemical transformations of the real and thereby participates
directly in the forces and devices required to build an irenic industrial
future: capital, steam, the worker, the loom, the scythe, the locomotive.
In the following reflections we rejoin Du Camp's poem of incessant
labor and human progress some eighty years later, at a time when, at least
in Italy, his dreams of universal peace had metamorphosed into a militant
politics and poetics designed to identify the concept of national sover-
eignty with strategic metals, materials, and fuels. Mussolini's invasion of
Ethiopia in October 1935 provoked stiff economic sanctions on the part
of the League of Nations by the year's end, sanctions that substantially
reshaped not only the Italian economy but also the cultural and technical
debates of fascism's second decade. Thanks to these events, songs cele-
brating modern materials quickly devolved into songs of autarchy, epics
celebrating the nation's struggle for economic self-sufficiency that Musso-
lini's Italy shared with Hitler's Germany and Stalin's Russia and also, with
notable variations, with numerous liberal democratic and social demo-
cratic states. The bards of this autarchic poetry were many, but I will limit
myself to a single case study here: that of Marinetti, the founder and
leader of the Italian futurist movement. More specifically, I will be recon-
structing the context that gave rise to the culminating work of the final
phase of his literary career, The Non-Human Poem of Technicisms (Il poema
non umano dei tecnicismi) (1940), a work wrapped around a core of poems
dedicated to proving the proposition that rayon is the fabric of modern
times (fig. 1).
Rayon is what is known as a modified natural (or artificial) fabric
since, unlike true synthetic textiles such as nylon, it is made from plant-
derived cellulose that is first transformed into a liquid compound and
?i/
FIG. 1.-"A nocturnal vision of power and beauty." Main factory building of
SNIA Viscosa's rayon production facilities in Torviscosa, 1939. From 10 anni di
attivitt della SNIA Viscosa (1939).
then reconverted back into fiber and spun." Straddling the threshold be-
tween the natural and the man-made, it was one of several such fabrics
seized upon by Italian industry; the fascist state; and contemporary de-
signers, writers, and artists as a site for elaborating a complex physics and
metaphysics of sovereignty that celebrated, on the one hand, a limited
and limiting national/natural landscape (imbued with attributes of hero-
3. The word rayon designates the family of man-made fibers and fabrics produced
from plant cellulose, usually derived from trees, though sometimes also from cotton seeds
("linters") and other plant material. Over the course of its history, rayon has assumed three
principal forms: nitrocellulose rayon (abandoned early on because of its flammability); vis-
cose rayon (the most successful variety); and cuprammonium rayon (also known by the
trademark Bemberg). For purposes of this essay, the term refers to viscose rayon. Textile
terminology is not always applied with rigor in nontechnical publications from the pre-
World War II period, but standard usage defines synthetic fibers and fabrics as entirely pro-
duced by chemical means, whereas artificial fibers and fabrics, on the contrary, rely upon
naturally occurring fibrous matter or materials that are chemically modified. Therefore,
both rayon and Lanital, a casein-based autarchic fabric that will be discussed below, are
considered artificial fabrics.
ism and moral superiority) and, on the other, the unlimited power of
technology, culture, and the national will to transform that very lack into
abundance, beauty, and strength. In some regards the mythology in ques-
tion was a distinctively Italian one, unimaginable outside the framework
of fascist ideology and/or, more broadly, an economy dominated by small-
scale, family-based industries; craft and design traditions hypersensitive
to the dialectical interplay between modernity and the cultural-historical
past; and a long-standing tendency to conflate aesthetic and political
manifestations of power and selfhood. In no other country could a fashion
mobilization built around the cult of national fabrics have been undertaken
with such apparent urgency and so few smiles. As early as 1930, the dicta-
tor rallied his troops with a call for "an Italian style in furnishings, inte-
rior decoration, and clothing [that] does not yet exist: it can exist,
therefore it must come into existence now."4 The troops replied by devel-
oping a design culture that, constrained by the need for stylistic auton-
omy and for reliance upon both old and newly developed autarchic
materials, set the stage for Italy's emergence as a world leader in postwar
fashion, textiles, and design. The effect may be charted in terms of ca-
reers such as that of the brilliant Milanese designer-architect Gi6 Ponti,
forefather and catalyst of much postwar design work. It is also registered
in the annals of corporations like the Salvatore Ferragamo shoe company.
Onetime shoemaker to Hollywood stars such as Theda Bara, Jean
Harlow, and Rudolph Valentino, Ferragamo built his business around
autarchic materials and themes from the mid-1930s onward.5 When
high-quality kid leather became unavailable, he devised elegant designs,
including Roman-style sandals and several shoes bearing the imprint
DUX, made out of viscose-derived cellophane, leather waste, bakelite,
raffia, bark, rope, hemp, and rubber derivatives (fig. 2).6 When the steel
stiffeners that once supported his high-heeled creations became scarce,
he experimented with wire and leather before coming up with the solu-
tion that would ensure his firm's wartime and postwar triumph: platform
and wedge-heeled shoes made out of autarchic wood or cork.7
thread vamp and f-shaped, sculpted wood heel-was new. Introduced in 1947 and ideally
suited to Dior's "New Look" (with its lowered shoulders and ankle-length skirts made of
precious brocades and taffetas), the invisible shoe's heel design was, nonetheless, directly
based on Ferragamo's prior wedge designs.
8. Samuel Phillips, Guide to the Crystal Palace and Park (London, 1855), p. 135.
can power looms "in practical operation, attracting crowds of visitors, all
interested in the curious automatic movements and apparently marvel-
ous results accomplished by these machines."9 At the 1889 and 1900 Paris
Expositions, the practice was carried over to the display of Count
L. M. H. Bernigaud de Chardonnet's newly discovered marvel, "artificial
silk"-renamed rayon in 1924, in order to avoid intimations of artificiality
and/or inferiority to natural silk-and the magical machines responsible
for its manufacture.'0 The following century extended and expanded
upon this legacy, introducing wave after wave of so-called miracle fabrics,
from nylon to Dacron (polyester) to spandex, often in exhibitions allego-
rizing them in nationalist or internationalist terms." Regularly identified
with themes of democratization, emancipation, resistance, strength, and
personal hygiene, these "fabrics of the future" (not unlike modern "fab-
rics of the past," ranging from Scottish tartans to Ghanaian kente cloth)
provide a direct tie-in between efforts at collective self-fashioning and
individual subject-formation.12 Unlike other emblems of modernity and
potential objects for prosthetic self-extension, such as airplanes, automo-
biles, household appliances, and armored cars, fabrics, which surround
the epidermis as a secondary membrane, bear a uniquely intimate and
direct relation to the human body. Indeed, it was as a literal second skin,
as the technologically enhanced double of a primary skin seen as once
enfeebled and enervated but reinvigorated thanks to the fascistization of
the Italian body politic, that rayon and autarchic peers like Lanital, a
casein- (which is to say, cheese-) based artificial textile, were dubbed the
fabrics of modern times.
18. "Bisogna che il poeta si prodighi, con ardore, sfarzo e munificenza, per aumentare
l'entusiastico fervore degli elementi primordiali" (Marinetti, "Fondazione e Manifesto del
Futurismo," p. 10).
19. "Una matematica qualitativa abolisce la morte che e quantitativa" (Marinetti, "La
matematica futurista immaginativa qualitativa: Calcolo poetico delle battaglie," Teoria e in-
venzionefuturista, p. 231). Compare the conclusion of the "Technical Manifesto of Futurist
Literature": "Dead cells intermingle with living cells. Art is the need to destroy and to dis-
perse oneself, a great watering can of heroism that floods the world" (Marinetti, "Manifesto
tecnico della letteratura futurista," p. 54).
20. On Futurism's excursions into the fashion world, see Enrico Crispolti, Ilfuturismo
e la moda: Balla e gli altri (Venice, 1986); and Emily Braun, "Futurist Fashion: Three Manifes-
toes," ArtJournal 54 (Spring 1995): 34-41. Crispolti omits any mention of "The First Futurist
Manifesto for Italian Fashion" ("Primo Manifesto futurista per la moda italiana"), jointly
authored by Ernesto Thayaht and Marinetti: a fiercely nationalistic polemic in favor of "Fu-
turist Mediterranean mystical and aerial" new fashion. (A typescript of this manifesto, ap-
parently published in early 1932, may be found in E T. Marinetti Papers, Getty Research
Institute, Los Angeles, Resource Collections, accession no. 850702, folder 172.)
21. Marinetti, "I1 vestito antineutrale," reproduced in Crispolti, Il futurismo e la moda,
p. 90. Unlike the bulk of Balla's manifesto, the cited passage was left unmodified by Mari-
netti. The notion of sartorial musculature is emphasized throughout both versions of the
manifesto, particularly in their discussions of color: "fabrics [ought to be employed] whose
colors and iridescence thrill. They should be muscular colors, ultraviolets, ultrareds, ultra-
turquoises, ultragreens, ultrayellows, ultraooooranges [aranciooooni], ultravermillions" (Ma-
rinetti, "II vestito antineutrale," p. 90).
maschile") (1932), the core concern is bodily decay and the solution an
acceleration of libidinal flows (fig. 3).22
This leads the authors, on the one hand, to argue for what Volt refers
to as "the dictatorship of artistic Genius" over men's and women's fashion
("MMF," p. 115)-that is, for the sort of unbridled fantasy that would
"obtain for men the same sartorial freedom that women have long en-
joyed"23 and transform woman into a "living plastic complex" (un
complesso plastico vivente) through the creation of "illusionistic sarcastic so-
norous noisy homicidal explosive outfits; outfits that lunge shock trans-
22. See Volt, "Manifesto della moda femminile futurista," reproduced in Crispolti, II
futurismo e la moda, p. 115, hereafter abbreviated "MMF"; Marinetti, "Contro il lusso fem-
minile," Futurismo e Fascismo (1924), Teoria e invenzionefuturista, pp. 546-49, hereafter abbre-
viated "CLF"; and Ernesto Thayaht and Ruggero Micahelles, "Manifesto per la
trasformazione dell'abbigliamento maschile," reproduced in Crispolti, Ilfuturismo e la moda,
p. 137.
23. "Reclamiamo per l'uomo quella liberth nel vestire gia da tempo raggiunta dalla
donna" (Thayaht and Michahelles, "Manifesto per la trasformazione dell'abbigliamento
maschile," p. 137).
:?';??
ii
":
" ?" :
;?.?:-: ?:dI
?:il: ::
':'??"?
''''
r;::::
1. :
':""'
"C: '*"
!:?Y???::
;:i " )9~~iBi~Eis~?E~I2jB~)? i?~?~'*?
'''?
.!!; ???:
ii:!
~:::
r!:;s;~i.?:?.?? ??:~:;??'
';' ??::"?
'"'"'' "''"'' ' "'"'?'"
;~??
i :: r "'"::
.""' n.':i; lI6G
?~?1-??*: ??'???:
~EII::? . ??I??:?.'? i... "j
??: :!??:
iiriia??:?? ?? 1;?:?
?~?????????-? ?????? ??????? ????
?~???~;???
;???~?~
??: ?
?I'?' """
I~IB~Al"i?
24. "Outfits that lunge" reads "toilettes a scatto" in the original, implying an analogy
with "motori a scatto" or "internal combustion engines."
25. Thayaht and Micahelles, "Manifesto per la trasformazione dell'abbigliamento
maschile," p. 137.
26. Marinetti et al., "Il manifesto futurista del cappello italiano," reproduced in Cris-
polti, Ilfuturismo e la moda, p. 143. I have translated "pelle" as "leather" because the alternate
meaning, "fur," appears to conflict with some of Marinetti's earlier pronouncements.
27. Renato di Bosso and Ignazio Scurto, "Manifesto futurista sulla cravatta italiana,"
reproduced in Crispolti, Ilfuturismo e la moda, p. 147.
At
IWX
"i .
, ..
: ,,
:...
point of skin and garment. So banished forever are delicate and costly
fabrics like silk: "the reign of silk over women's fashions must come to an end once
and for all" ("MMF," p. 115). In their place, futurism embraced inexpen-
sive surrogates, from industrial metals to man-made yet natural fabrics
like Lanital and rayon.
Such was the setting in which the conquest of matter assumed a privi-
leged place within what Marinetti referred to as "the Futurist religion-
morality of speed." New materials like high-speed steel, aluminum,
zinc-aluminum alloys, tempered glass, and plastics became both emblems
of a crystalline modernity that had emerged from out of the dark shadows
of decadence and the body double or prosthetic extension of the new
multiplied man and woman. The principle was firmly in place by the time
of Thayaht's cast-steel Synthetic Effigy of "il Duce" (1929) (fig. 4). "The idea
of the Lictorial ax, of Roman arches, of the warrior's helmet, and of the
gaze fixed on a distant future," Thayaht wrote to his brother Ruggero,
"all these are brought together and interpenetrate to create a whole that
truly resembles il Duce. This work does not aspire to be a portrait, but rather
a symbolic effigy of the dynamic power of the Man in whose hands lies
Italy's fate."28 True resemblance is here established via the attributes of a
metal (ferro acciaioso, or "steely iron") that has escaped the bad or passeist
materiality of perfumes, moribund flesh, rusted machines, and aban-
doned ruins. Mussolinian steel offers instead a portrait of a redeemed
and explosive material world. Resembling a kind of ax blade or prow-
the themes of Thayaht's two other famous portraits of il Duce-cutting
through the oceanic mob or the seas of history, the head is at once a
unicum and a multiple. Planted on a cubic stone block, it rises up as the
singular profile that gives a face and name to the brute collective fact of
the fascist revolution. Its streamlined surfaces suggest bulletlike penetra-
tion and bulletproof impenetrability, striving to fuse two contradictory
effects: swift motion and monumental stillness.
By 1936, Mussolinian steel had become a well-worn clich6, as, for
instance, in Fortunato Depero's poem "Steel" ("Acciaio"), which proclaims
that
29. Fortunato Depero, "Acciaio," Poesia (n.p., 1936-37), p. 21. The immediate source
of inspiration appears to be Marinetti's own "Dynamic Portrait of Mussolini" in the preface
to Marinetti e ilfuturismo (1929):
When he rises to speak, he extends his overpowering head, squared-off like a projec-
tile, packed full of good gunpowder, the cubic will of the State.
Yet he lowers it when concluding, always ready to attack the question head on
or, better, to gore it with the force of a bull. Futurist eloquence, well chewed by teeth
of steel, plastically sculpted by an intelligent hand that shaves off the useless clay of
contrary opinions....
His will plows the mob like a guided missile that explodes. [Marinetti, preface
to Marinetti e il Futurismo, in Teoria e invenzionefuturista, p. 576]
30. The proposal, first printed in March 1923 in the newspaper LImpero but later
integrated into Futurismo efascismo, reads as follows:
Just as credit institutions are created to help industry and commerce, so there should
be institutions that provide financial support to cultural events or institutions for
industrial art or that lend money to artists so as to facilitate their work (manuscripts,
paintings, statues, etc.), travel for purpose of research, and advertising. [Marinetti,
"I diritti artistici propugnati dai futuristi italiani: Manifesto al Governo fascista," Fu-
turismo e Fascismo, in Teoria e invenzionefuturista, p. 565]
The initiative was initially endorsed by Mussolini, though without yielding any results. On
Gualino's activities as patron of architectural Rationalism, see Dennis P. Doordan, Building
Modern Italy: Italian Architecture 1914-1936 (New York, 1988), pp. 58-60.
31. Documents concerning the Gualino scandals (which involved financial fraud as
well as currency speculation) are preserved at the Central State Archive in Rome, Segreteria
Particolare del Duce, Carteggio Riservato 1922-1943, folder 102 ("Gualino"). The file con-
tains a great many letters from enraged stockholders, as well as documentation concerning
Mussolini's actions and special interest in promoting the manufacture of rayon. On Borletti,
see the entry by Alceo Riosa, Dizionario biografico degli italiani, 46 vols. to date (Rome,
1960-), 12:794-96.
32. A letter from Franco Marinotti, director general of the SNIA Viscosa since the
time of Borletti's takeover, confirms the visit: "Thank you for your lyric [most likely his
newly published Poema africano], which is especially meaningful to me after the visit which
you were kind enough to make to our factory in Cesano Maderno" (Franco Marinotti, letter
to Marinetti, 27 Feb. 1937, Marinetti Archive, Beinecke Library, Yale University, box 13,
folder 696).
ers, the flow of milk with the flow of tanks and aerial squadrons, the text
was published in a lavish edition on whose tricolor cover the red outline
of a cow's head floated over a green title and factory, with a black and
white bolt of Lanital curling into the center (figs. 5, 6, 7, 8).3 Even before
the completion of this first work, the SNIA Viscosa was already expressing
its satisfaction with this collaborative venture involving art and industry.
"Away in Milan [when Marinetti was present]," wrote its director general
in a letter dated 3 August 1937, "only now can I see for myself the enthu-
siasm with which you are struggling to complete the already magnificent
The Poem of the Milk Dress. Lanital is marching towards new horizons-
[our] poems must replicate themselves."34
And replicate themselves they did. New industrial poetry followed
almost immediately, whether in the commodified guise of ever new varie-
ties of autarchic rayon, or in the literary guise of The Poem of Viscose Tower,
a words-in-freedom text that retraces the range of emotions felt by fields
of reeds as they sway under the wind and stars and confront their trans-
formation into rayon within the utopian setting of the factory-city of Vis-
cose Tower (Torviscosa).35 This work inspired two further progeny: one
devoted to the actual manufacture of viscose rayon, entitled "Simultane-
ous Poem of Woven Light" ("Poesia simultanea della luce tessuta") (1939),
which provides a technical account of the chemistry involved; and an-
other, the "Simultaneous Poem of Italian Fashion" ("Poesia simultanea
della moda italiana") (1939), concerned with combating "the tasty cere-
bralism of French fashion sick with good taste measure and harmony we
prefer the passionate creative dynamic military surprising instinct of Ital-
ian fashion thoroughly invented [tutta inventata] with no less invented tex-
33. The full title is Il poema del vestito di latte: Parole in liberta futuriste di Marinetti, accadem-
ico d'Italia (Milan, 1937). The back cover bears the phrase, "Omaggio della SNIA Viscosa"
("courtesy of the SNIA Viscosa"), which suggests that the document was sent out free of
charge to associates and friends. In The Non-Human Poem of Technicisms the poem appeared
under the title of "Simultaneous Poem of a Milk Dress" (Poesia simultanea di un vestito di latte).
34. "Assente a Milano, posso compiacermi solo oggi dell'entusiasmo col quale Ella si
accinge a completare il gia magnifico Poema del vestito di latte. II Lanital marcia verso nuove
realizzazioni-i poemi devono ripetersi" (Marinotti, letter to Marinetti, 3 Aug. 1937, Mari-
netti Archive, Beinecke Library, Yale University, box 13, folder 696). The closing reflexive
ripetersi implies not just repetition (in the sense of rehearsal or repetitive consumption) but
also especially reproduction. The reference to "poems" is deliberately imprecise, implying an
analogy between industrial products and literary artifacts. In fact, Lanital proved only par-
tially successful at first. Insufficiently resilient, it was prone to stretching, had an unpleasant
scent, and did not hold up well under regular wear and tear. Some of these flaws were
eliminated in the course of subsequent years, and it was reborn as the far more successful
artificial textile Merinova in the postwar period.
35. The poem was originally published as Ilpoema di Torre Viscosa (Milan, 1938). In The
Non-Human Poem of Technicisms it appeared under the alternative title of "Simultaneous
Poem of Arunda Donax Reeds" (Marinetti, "Poesia simultanea dei canneti Arunda Donax,"
II Poema non umano dei tecnicismi (1940), Teoria e invenzione futurista, pp. 1151-60; hereafter
abbreviated "PCA").
j.. .... .. . .
iii~". .:?i?~'~''Biib c .......
:X x
:%~
:N:
:i :... . .....
:N:
..... ..
.. :".: . : :.....
.. . ..... : .: . ::. ' ..-. ..
. .. .. .
. .
. .
. .. .. .. .. -.... .
?:(6...... .... .. .
. ... ... .... .... ... ...
x - - - X:: :N:: X: ?
::u ::xx ~ : :
-9.x.:
.:x ?:x.,:,
............
x:
. ge;?g i,:i: :: :?
ol XMI-0-
:" 'tx;
xii??il ::a:l iii
::N V:::
iiiai'i:iiii
i'i
;Y~I~b
i?P . . .. .....
?ii::t?:*i~iifB~::Ei:~ ;~A:: x%:X~1
-tl ic gk+ itwi plw
r~rp~rrj ? IXI
. . .. ... . .. . ... .. .
Ad m Mob . .. ...
.. ...
c... .. .
.:
....... g-isoft Amsrpa:~~- ibm MM&
oqpww sr 5,sa p~ ...........
:ii*we
410?
tiles and ornaments."36 Together with The Poem of the Milk Dress and The
Poem of Viscose Tower, this quartet of industry-sponsored and industry-
inspired texts would make up the backbone of the 1940 collection, The
Non-Human Poem of Technicisms, dedicated to "the exemplary Italianness
dynamism autonomy creativity of the SNIA VISCOSA corporation as an
homage from we Futurist aeropoets dedicated to the uniqueness of Impe-
rial Fascist Italy."37
In this compilation, the futurist leader and member of the Italian
Royal Academy set out to yoke the antiliterary to the nonhuman in ways
that echo the Soviet avant-garde's early flirtations with productivism:
"While the earth's poets continue more or less to spin nostalgias and de-
spairs around the verses of Leopardi Baudelaire or Mallarme the Italian
Futurist Movement has for many years prompted its poets and artists to
create a 'non-human' poetry and art which is to say a poetry and art
extraneous to humanity thanks to its systematic extraction of new beaut-
ies and new music from the technicisms of machine civilization."" He
went on to add:
The new task of poetry and art in Imperial Fascist Italy daughter of
the Fast War: that of organizing the idealization of single conceptual
administrative manual mechanical chemical forms of work with a
profitable distribution of intuitions and creative efforts.... [To do
so] without dressing everything up in verbal and plastic and musical
rhetorics without the long rancid symbolism of plow eagle scythe
anvil hammer abolished by airplanes sowing-machines electrical
plants pneumatic hammers motor-plows we want to mine every work
in its characteristic technics and production-mode so as to extract
slivers of poetry.39
36. Marinetti, "Poesia simultanea della moda italiana," II Poema non umano dei tecnicismi,
in Teoria e invenzionefuturista, pp. 1187-88.
37. Marinetti, dedication of II Poema non umano dei tecnicismi, in Teoria e invenzionefutur-
ista, p. 1139. The compilation was first published in Milan in 1940. On the basis of manu-
script evidence, the composition of "Simultaneous Poem of Woven Light" would seem to
date back to around the time of Marinetti's visit to Torviscosa (September 1938). The earli-
est direct mention of it and of the "Simultaneous Poem of Italian Fashion" that I have been
able to locate occurs in December 1939, so I give 1939 as a tentative date for both. In Teoria
e invenzionefuturista, De Maria gives no indication that the text was published prior to the
appearance of The Non-Human Poem of Technicisms.
38. Marinetti, "Invito ai lettori spregiudicati," preface to II Poema non umano dei tecnici-
smi, in Teoria e invenzionefuturista, p. 1142; originally published in the April 1937 manifesto
"Poetry and Corporatist Art."
39. Marinetti, "Estrazione sistematica di nuovi splendori e nuove musiche dai tecnici-
smi," introduction to II Poema non umano dei tecnicismi, in Teoria e invenzione futurista, pp.
1143-44.
At first glance, the choice of textile manufacture as the site for car-
rying out the enterprise just described may seem eccentric, even for a
poet with tastes as outlandish as Marinetti's. Yet I hope to demonstrate
that, far from anomalous, this choice stands as the end product of a de-
cade-long historical process that had imbued man-made fabrics with dis-
tinctly modernist political and poetic meanings. Just like cast iron, which
for Emile Zola transforms the arcades of Paris into "fairy palaces petri-
fied as if by the wave of a magic wand"; tempered glass, which for Paul
Scheerbart provided the new environment that would "completely trans-
form mankind"; steel, which, from Walter Gropius through Depero, was
envisaged as "the modern poem of the most accurate perfection and
greatest power"; or polystyrene, which for Raymond Queneau in his ode
to plastics, "Le Chant du Styrene," provided the basis for an entirely new
cosmogony, so by 1937 it seemed natural enough that artificial fabrics
should be designated the "rural poetry" of a new Imperial Italy.42 "A fab-
40. "Un giorno i lavoratori e i loro utensili sprizzeranno fuori autopoeti a scintille"
(ibid., p. 1145; my emphasis). Autopoeti is a neologism, most likely modeled after words such
as "autopilot." On automation and the nonhuman, see the appendix to this essay.
41. Marinetti, "Invito ai lettori spregiudicati," p. 1142.
42. Interview with Emile Zola, "L'ouverture de l'Exposition universelle," Le Messager
de l'Europe (June 1878), p. 346, quoted in Jacques Noiray, L'Univers de Zola, vol. 1 of Le
Romancier et la machine: L'Image de la machine dans le roman francais (Paris, 198 1), p. 242; Paul
Scheerbart, Glass Architecture, ed. Dennis Sharp, trans. James Palmes (New York, 1972), p.
74; Depero, "Acciaio," p. 21; and see Raymond Queneau, "Le Chant du Styrene," Chine et
chien, suivie de Petite Cosmogonie portative et de "Le Chant du Styrene" (Paris, 1969).
ric is not the proverbial textile gazed upon in store windows," writes a
typical commentator on the 1937 National Textile Exhibition, "rather it is
a secret power ripped out of nature and it possesses a proteiform vitality,
opening up labyrinths of new modes of expression and demanding mo-
dernity of impulses and plants."43 Similar imaginings permeate the great
mass of 1930s technical writings on the production of man-made fabrics,
which envisage fabrics like rayon not as artificial but rather as an intensi-
fied, accelerated, redeemed prolongation of a (national) natural world
that has been emancipated and democratized by modern science.44 Such
was the view of the futurist poet as well, but it is worth insisting that, in
its production practices, technical writings, and advertising campaigns,
industry took the lead in celebrating man-made fabrics' "proteiform vital-
ity" and "demanding modernity of impulses and plants." Art merely
served as an amanuensis. It came along afterwards and reworked already
codified myths.
Italy's traditional leadership in the domains of silk and wool produc-
tion had ensured the relatively early entry of giants such as the SNIA
Viscosa and its rival, the CISA Viscosa, into the field of viscose rayon
production in 1920. The ups and downs of the post-World War I econ-
omy, particularly in the wake of the Wall Street crash of 1929, led the
SNIA Viscosa through a cycle of booms and busts which underscored the
vulnerabilities of the Italian textile industry.45 First, there was the matter
of foreign tariff barriers, which had been growing in response to severe
problems of oversupply on the international market. Second, there was
43. Carla Rulli, "Problemi dell'Autarchia: La mostra del tessile," Meridiano di Roma, 26
Dec. 1937, p. 12; hereafter abbreviated "PA."
44. See, for instance, works such as Silvio Coggi, luta efibre autarchiche: Canapa, ginestra,
sparto efibre dell'Impero (Milan, 1939); and the writings collected by the National Federation
of Consortia for the Defense of Hemp Growers (Federazione Nazionale dei Consorzi per la
Difesa della Canapicoltura) on the occasion of the congress which accompanied the Forli
textile exhibition (11-20 Dec. 1936). Among the latter we find a technical report by the
federation's president, Roberto Roversi, prefaced by a lengthy analogy between the agricul-
tural policies of Julius Caesar and those of Mussolini, followed by a roll call of materials-
hemp, linen, broom plant, ramie, agave, and so forth-each invoked as if they were soldiers
belonging to an avant-garde brigade. He concludes his exordium: "In the fascist clime ev-
erything is possible.... And because Italy's newly enhanced presence in the textile sector
is fueled by the imperialist spirit that inflames the heart of every Italian worthy of belonging
to il Duce, the national textile problem will be resolved even at the cost of unlimited sacrifice
and without the slightest compromise" (Roberto Roversi, "Le fibre tessili vegetali prodotti
in Italia e nelle Colonie," Relazioni mostra convegno delle fibre tessili nazionali e dell'Impero [Rome,
1937]). Interesting and less technically oriented evidence to this same effect may be found
in the special issue of Curzio Malaparte's Prospettive devoted to the national textile industry
(Prospettive, no. 5 [1938]).
45. For the official history of the SNIA Viscosa, see SNIA Viscosa, 10 anni di attivitdt
della SNIA Viscosa (Milan, 1939), characterized by its Rationalist layout and typography, and
SNIA Viscosa, La SNIA Viscosa (Milan, 1958). Both are careful to elide the Gualino scandals
and the direct role played by Mussolini and National Fascist Party secretary Augusto Turati
in the corporation's various crises during the 1920s and early 1930s.
amana essnS
........
Mar mamma a
i:X-
EggggI $8AWIMV
.:.. .....?i
?... ....."
... ........
FIG. 9.-"I
and recen
service of
1938. Note
ernist pav
Rome's Cir
del ppopolo
times an
ucts stre
federatio
46. Corrier
1930s, the n
and even m
over the fo
the Italiani
Pinkus, Bod
abbreviated
spelling pr
TN 1 :: U.S.
\"ii'?'?-''' r .lmm .i:w N....,? ::: :. .
: ? : -:.::M :N.iN .
4. Uki~ii~gi~ ~iii~i:
i~
MM~N.~ ~";%
M V A I
:i: ?;?~
i
?:~
''X
-I C~r.* ? ~ easlF -N
IM N
N %N,;
.. ..................
........
.....'m.E.E.... ... . 2F..]......
'.... .............' T :OR.......i
- ; L L ~..O.:..
z .
i .i
rayon's virtues and applications (fig. 11).49 Atop each of the trucks were
loudspeakers from which were broadcast a series of rayon songs com-
posed especially for the trucks' tour of the Italian peninsula: an event
known as "The Five Thousand Miles of Rayon" (after the legendary auto
race, the Mile Miglia).50 Launched on 18 May 1934 and completed to-
49. Pinkus mysteriously alludes to a "rayon train," apparently on the basis of a mis-
reading of the Italian label auto-treno (BR, p. 221).
50. Among the many rayon songs is the following, entitled "II poeta e Nina," whose
author went by the name Reco:
All
= ....... ~
~I ?? ... . ... ~.
.*: .. ....
I...i I6
ff*
wards the end of the same year, the tour-or "triumphal march," as it
was described in an extensive advertising campaign--included not just
exhibits but also dances and fashion shows celebrating the elegance, du-
rability, and savings that could be achieved by switching to man-made
fabrics (fig. 12).51
The rayon road show's meanderings were covered on the so-called
rayon page, which became a standard feature in the major daily newspa-
pers during much of 1934 (fig. 13). There, news items covering the atten-
dance of the masses and visits by their leaders appeared weekly in the
company of interviews, industry updates, technical bulletins, and draw-
ings and photographs of Italy's newest fashions, along with fables, apho-
risms, essays, and short stories singing rayon's praises by popular writers
such as the onetime futurist Enrico Cavacchioli. The highlight of every
rayon page was the brilliantly playful rayon poems of Luciano Folgore (a
longtime futurist fellow traveler), gathered together under such titles as
"Mythology and Rayon" and "Rayon and Poetry." Some examples are in
order. Rayon myth 1:
Another "Nina" song appeared under the title "Anacreontica" on the 18 Dec. 1934 rayon
page of Corriere Padano.
51. One of the announcements for the rayon truck convoy, published on the 18 May
1934 rayon page (in Corriere Padano, among other newspapers), promises the following:
The convoy has a double aspect for, once it reaches a destination, it will unfold its
coverings in a flash and transform itself into an authentic exhibition hall for rayon
products. From the threateningly armed vehicle, in the meantime, songs, sounds,
and phrases singing the praises of the new textile will emanate. And a luminous
beam ffascio] will issue from it, projecting on an overhead screen the splendors of
rayon. Then, as soon as the mob has admired (as it will never tire of doing), as soon
as all have impressed on their memory that vision of lights, colors, and elegance, the
hall will in a few seconds transform itself anew into a motorized caravan and will
depart to greet "other folks who perhaps await it." [Corriere Padano, 18 May 1934]
N., M: :x--f
.. .. . .. .. ......... . ..
-N.-M-MMDU! KT-t!m o .: . .i'
---..i9~r~
r: . : , Vi:
? : I/.E,
TA .TE.L...: O......
-.-5:: -N-C.-mt R.
merraviglloso prodotto
. - " i.: itallano
N ? . . s~ignifi~c
4.::: N N - :V%,
NO. .. .. . ne A3M *g
M-Xif- N -4, dl 2i? "Tonm a U::
a! TEATR0 COMU
. . ... . . . . .. . .. . . . . . .
IM :.YX?X.:..:
NOW, :X. :M: N. N
.. ... .... .
NIX.
R.
:J: . N-
r*~:~W ,~R "XX X N X-::..:%:::-.:. L . . I
- h -r- a~~rr
: ?-:: *7 -::;;P;:-;;.?
n. :WMIV- *~.~r~ r
Z= an i;Z Mm m 0
....... .......... .
R2??:s; f~
A.M. At *a ~ rr.~ii~
-m.. ~ ?U:.0
'"i: xrtit'r. : M*a:?
-wow.. d.I'm
.. .. .... .. IF, ?c?
*4MONA~k ANO
;:.?? * ~i~~ *~rW.
i i~li~~ii~ur.u~r*u!~.;_i*****
W I M. -Aftkr** l. ;~js*i~~( u 4" lb "'Atil~:
Q~LL~ *~ , rll~)~Fi~ iy W~i~l~rr~r ~ *~J r~k;
SA*-A WA% A ~ V?N --.L -_
W* 4WAWAF P - -L "
. ... .. ..
.. ........ 11 S~ C*~ r ~ I ~ I ,. .~
. . . . . . . . . . . .-EL=:i-r~~. ,/ "
Ok Yr*.~~~~~~,Y**~4* w(rry~ ~?_~~rC!il
u~ i~iurx
Mbow **?.~L*L
A-? wlft. Ak x" A aI:rrMaw.
n?~r r?~r~ ~ V- -*WOW,,.,, "L~~~?
.A .6 - ft OW ib WE, - ..........
............... E ........ ........
......X "
WN I Akm*~*IU~*iCn?
AMI~a*l. ~ , ~*u~, ~?pi~U ~i?rb**Pk~s*~;*:
i~~ :us~~~:* ?l~* ur i b~ivF . ... .. ... ... f"
........ .. ....
. . . . .***~**. . . . ...:
Rayon myth 2:
Rayon myth 3:
And Ariosto:
52. Corriere Padano, 18 May 1934. Other rayon mythologies elaborated by Folgore in-
clude Mercury and Thalia, Jove and Venus, Penelope and Ulysses, and a story of a nymph.
He subsequently added another three rayon fables: one concerning a siren (Corriere Padano,
19 July 1934) and the others on "Acquazzone and Solleone" and Sleeping Beauty (Corriere
Padano, 30 Oct. 1934).
53. "Il rayon e la poesia," Corriere Padano, 23 June 1934. There is no adequate way to
render into English the closing line of the second poem which inverts the popular Italian
expression "tutto fumo e niente arrosto" ("all smoke and no roast"), meaning something
like "all talk and no action," into "niente fumo e tutto arrosto" or "no talk and all action."
The verse is further complicated, however, by the substitution of the last name of the poet
Lodovico Ariosto for the word arrosto. Other rayon rewritings by Folgore targeted Dante,
Tasso, Manzoni, and Leopardi.
54. CISA Viscosa, Lefibre dell'eleganza (n.p., 1937), p. 10; hereafter abbreviated FE.
In all of the rayon poems, verbal quickness and levity are implicitly
designated as the poetic medium of an era in which, thanks to technologi-
cal advances and a modern state, leisure, luxury, and even a secularized
version of the glorified body have become available to the many. Folgore's
poems in particular suggest that, under fascism, fashion and, by exten-
sion, literature and art, once the exclusive preserves of the bourgeoisie
and the aristocracy, have become instruments for the forging of a true
mass society.
The same point was made in graphical terms by the army of stick
figures and mannequins found in period advertisements for rayon.55
55. This personification of textiles extended also to the Forli and Rome exhibitions
and was frequently picked up by commentators, as, for example, Luigi Antonelli, "Presenta-
zione della protagonista," Corriere Padano, 15 Dec. 1937. On rayon and the mannequins that
abound in period advertising, see BR, pp. 195-243. While sometimes acute and always
These modern everymen and everywomen appear either against the ty-
pographical backdrop of the phrase "rayon is a textile and not a surrogate
nor an imitation of other textiles" or against texts describing rayon's Ital-
ianness, its resistance and economy, the almost miraculous array of tex-
tures that can be produced with it, and its no less miraculous adaptability
to the multiple lives led by contemporary Italians (figs. 14 and 15). In-
deed, the fabric is thought to be so rooted in the Italian soil and so infi-
nitely adaptable that the ads depict it as suitable for applications such
as flags, uniforms, pajamas, tablecloths, upholstery, and wall coverings.
They display rayon fabric bolts coming to life, entire houses built out of
rayon, and department stores rising up in the form of rayon skyscrapers
(fig. 16). The globe itself is shown wrapped in rayon, Italy's imperial uni-
form (fig. 17).
The last element in this elaborate campaign assumed the form of a
series of pavilions for Italy's most important trade fairs, starting with Emi-
lio Lancia and Giancarlo Palanti's Rationalist pavilion for the 1934 Fiera
di Milano, in whose central hall loomed an immense rayon flag, and even-
tually extending beyond the national borders to the Italian pavilion at
the 1939 New York World's Fair, which featured a "demonstration of ma-
chines actually manufacturing synthetic fibers: rayon and artificial wool
fiber derived from ordinary cow's milk."56 Dozens of these structures were
built for the SNIA Viscosa between 1935 and 1940 by architects such as
Eugenio Faludi, to the point that Rationalist glass architecture, accompa-
imaginative, Pinkus's analysis is weakened both by the looseness of her associative chains
(rays-radiation-rayon-X-rays; spinneret-hymen) and by her overall claim that, despite their
heterogeneity, their international character, and the evident continuities between pre-
World War I, interwar, and post-World War II graphic culture, advertising images from
the fascist period are to be considered the repressed material that forms "a ground for the
present Italian state and its economy" (BR, p. 1). Yet as she herself observes, Bibendum, the
Michelin man-an icon born in France well before the advent of fascism-was ubiquitous in
1920s and 1930s Italian advertising. He is alive today, along with many other prewar ho-
munculi like the Perugina chocolate figure who survived the war much as Aunt Jemima has
persisted in American culture. Hardly the "forgotten icons of a generation that now passes
itself off as dead," these little creatures remain no less visible in "the present Italian state"
than they were during the fascist decades (BR, p. 1). If, like Ronald McDonald and Poppin'
Fresh, the Pillsbury Doughboy, they are able to shuttle so effortlessly back and forth across
national, historical, and ideological barriers, some questions arise. To wit: is the psychoana-
lytic notion of repression-too unproblematically coupled here to fascism's literal repressive
acts-the right tool to examine a phenomenon that pushes so insistently to the surface and
seems unconcerned with either revealing or concealing its past? Moreover, if advertising
culture and design practices (like so many other features of interwar industrial develop-
ment) are so decidedly heterogeneous and transnational, to what degree can they tell us
anything distinctive about fascism? (Unless, that is, one is willing to accept the crude pre-
sumption that fascism somehow distilled within itself the very essence of advanced capi-
talism.)
56. Nations: New York World's Fair, ed. William Bernbach and Herman Jaffe (New York,
1939), p. 99.
1 42 :e...
. ........ ee 1. .M
40,mo,2?? ",p?
I-Am, KF
W. M 41-4
cm?
. ...... .. ....... 1? 41
cm
.... .. . .. .....
WP?z,;, P
. ..........
lk
::i!:::: ii ii: .
? ,,-:.: . -.._-,-
I -s ...........
path of return leads back through two developments that directly in-
formed the poems that make up the collection's core: the foundation by
the SNIA Viscosa of the fascist new town of Torviscosa, celebrated in The
Poem of Viscose Tower; and the discovery of a new fabric made entirely from
Italian source materials, celebrated in The Poem of the Milk Dress (fig. 20).
As regards the first, in 1936 SNIA Viscosa scientists discovered that
"noble," high-quality cellulose could be obtained from a type of reed-
the Arunda donax, or "canna gentile"-that was common to northern Ital-
ian marshlands (fig. 21). This led to the undertaking of a large-scale
reclamation program in the lower Friuli, and, in 1938, to the accelerated
construction of the state-of-the-art factory/city Torviscosa in the midst of
the reclaimed land.59 The event was much ballyhooed in the contempo-
rary press, and Marinetti's poem was an important cog in the propaganda
machine. After visiting the facilities on 27 August he wrote to his wife
Benedetta:
Bosso and Scurto's 1933 "Futurist Manifesto of the Italian Tie," preferring metals such as
aluminum, chrome, zinc, and tin.
59. For a telling indication of the importance of the foundation myth of Torviscosa,
see SNIA Viscosa, Torviscosa (Milan, 1941), which was bound with an Arunda donax spine
encasing green-tinted cover-boards on which cane fields were juxtaposed with the city's
geometry (see fig. 21). As for the press, the intensive coverage found in the magazine Tempo
is not unusual. See '~4runda donax: La canna gentile coltivata a Torre di Zuino per la cellulosa
nobile," Tempo, no. 25 (16 Nov. 1939): 1; "Torre di Zuino: Citta della cellulosa," Tempo, no.
26 (23 Nov. 1939): 1; "Dalla canna gentile alla cellulosa nobile," Tempo, no. 27 (30 Nov.
1939): 1; and "Conquiste autarchiche della SNIA Viscosa," Tempo, no. 33 (11 Jan. 1940): 1.
See also the special issue of the popular science magazine Vedere, no. 153 (15 May 1941),
devoted entirely to Torviscosa and synthetic fabric production. As noted earlier, the inspira-
tion for the building of Torviscosa may have come from the DuPont corporation, which had
built a model factory/city in Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania, in the mid-1920s.
60. Though the handwriting of the letter is not always easy to decipher, the original
reads something like this: "Ieri lunga minuziosa visita a Torre di Zuino con Marinotti. Chilo-
metrico canneti verdi divorati dalle cubicita e sfericita di una nuova citta nascente. Sara
pronta per il 21 settembre davanti al Duce. Nasce cosi un mio poema parolibero che spero
originale e potente" (Marinetti, letter to Benedetta Marinetti Cappa, Bolzano, 28 Aug. 1938,
Marinetti Archive, Beinecke Library, Yale University, box 5, folder 60.) Pinkus's assertions
that the poem's publication "coincides with the regime's official denunciation of 'modern'
and 'degenerate' art, which includes Futurism" and that "although Marinetti accepted his
commission from the Torre Viscosa, he may also be expressing anti-Mussolini sentiments at
this moment" are both counterfactual (BR, p. 265 n. 35). No such "official denunciation"
was issued and, despite Marinetti's embarrassment regarding the proclamation of racial
laws in 1938, his sentiments remained fiercely pro-Mussolinian.
&a??
.3..
41111
s::.:,.: ? ?: ?!
?.A .
Oil;ii
....::, Ci~~i~ii:jlii ..?:. ?:::: I ?,.. ... ... ......... .>:
4i?'??;i; ?::t~i~s o~a e d
M., ~ ~ l'31 ~ bn
Ci? :
FIG. 16.-"Rayon is the perfect fabric for today's fashions. Its ele-
gance, durability, and convenience render it preferable to all other tex-
tiles in all of its infinite applications." Advertisement. From Corriere
Padano, 6 Oct. 1934.
.l.0
M:
N --nR`5. :?i?
T ::.?li PA:?: --9
E* IL 111;
x.... N
......... :i
..'....*4i:?.il':.?: ? .. .. ..
E ? 'i~i'j;:~;i:I;:i~i::ci;:iliii~ii:iiiiiii~iiii:::l:iiii::i::X ..
. . .. ... -;
0: M-11 -X.4- . :
X :. . . . .. .'
.. .. . . .. ... .. ... ??i~'::::"fi:i: ...,. ..:::.
'::': :.:::::': :??.i::;?: ??:': .?li ;:: ??.;?.:;..RXi
?:isl4..
:':iiiillijT iiiiiiid::it ''':i.':l':~iilii:8? iild~l :? :i:6:'::iiiiiiiiiiP R
. . . . . . . . . . . '"'':""?;':':" :':~::
iN % . .. .. .. .. ......iiiair~a e iii~~~iii~~ii'ii
N Xiifaii 6!;i~;Sii~~
i:"': ...........
!liiiili~iii~ii$lllt~iiliV
... .. %
. .......iiil
... . . ... ....
:i. M.N
*::X:
i~riN
A s ::-:1-111: : -s ?:
Y: US:. VNH8?i""" :'
Ni :I--,. ic
g ? ... ...... di
..... .. U E:
'lIlllgBIr ~%~s~iap~t~p~a~i~ii~i~:i~: 2 ..W!?ffn ;.: ?? un:
:m~x----:: ARM i!
.......... .2 -c ... ........
4: NO! z??k
:0..xi~~~:~iig; acir:i:i', :iii.9i:s.:.:ri
?x X.?:
x~lOW4, :.n
s.i~~~?a ~i?????????? ~~.
in:P: Rnu w iii~~a ii~i:g. - :ii:?i: 5
ilia t
rN. ........ ..
s U
. . .. .. ......
X,:Pi
..... ...
AiB;
E L L L 0
NOBILEi
...: . ....... . ...... . .......; ? ."" i~ i~i
..... . .. . , . : . . . .. . . . ....... :... .. . ............. .. . .
. . . ... ..i: .:17:~~~~ ~~~~~~.1 :;i ;:..... .... . . .... ...!iii!!i!i'% iiiii!:i% iiii!i% ii
Ar?:
FIG. 19.-"Italian noble cellulose / The new conquest of the SNIA Viscosa in
the name of national textile independence." Advertisement for the SNIA pavilion at
the 1938 Milan Trade Fair, juxtaposing Eugenio Faludi's building with the cane tower
of Torviscosa, atop an image of the masses and against a backdrop of cane fields.
From La rivista illustrata del popolo d'Italia, Aug. 1938.
.. ... ... ..
Il~iiei..... ......"
i. . ...........
g~o'llpN,
. ... .......
;:ii -0
iici ZZ Xir
i~-mm. TO
X M.-::ii
E!~~'ie~n?i~s~~~aiAN:
.. . . . . .. . .
zTN :?:?
! t44404m
FIG. 20.-The fascist new town of Torviscosa (formerly Torre di Zuino) in 1939.
Press photograph. From Tempo, 23 Nov. 1938. Author's collection.
FIG. 21.-SNIA V
an Arunda donax sp
The Wolfsonian, M
The chemical allusion prefigures the arduous theme of the next nonhu-
man technicist exercise, "Simultaneous Poem of Woven Light," a demon-
stration of the miraculous effects of the harvest's violence that takes the
reader step by step through baths and boilers filled with caustic soda,
sulfuric acid, bleach, and the like; then through dryers, spinnerets, and
weaving machines; and, finally, through surfacing and cutting machines
onto retail shelves.63 But, for the moment, the accent falls on the human:
on leisure, labor, and sport; on the accelerated cadences of modern life;
on geometries of steel unleashing hitherto-unknown potentialities of
brute matter-this is the stuff of which Torviscosa is made (fig. 23). The
deeper meaning of the epiphany (and of Marinetti's entire 1940 compila-
tion) is still to come. It flashes before the reader in a valediction in which
the clustered words of Mallarme's Un Coup de dis jamais n'abolira le hasard
are reconfigured as "the new constellation whose stars spell out the word
AUTARCHY" ("PCA," p. 1160).64
My tale reaches its close with the development of a series of new
fabrics by the SNIA Viscosa, the CISA Viscosa, and their peers: autarchic
62. Nearly two hundred feet tall, this tower was employed for the production of cal-
cium bisulfite, a key ingredient in the viscose preparation process. The glass axe blade rep-
resents a borrowing from fascist show architecture: to be precise, from Libera's Italian
pavilions for the 1933 Chicago world's fair and the 1935 Brussels international exposition.
63. See the appendix to this essay for a translation of an unpublished early draft of
this poem.
64. Despite the upbeat tone of "Simultaneous Poem of Woven Light,"' Blum senses a
fracture here: "the excuse of progress and national self-sufficiency does not outweigh the
pathos of nature's destruction; the final, happy scene of prosperity makes sense only as a
convenient diversion from an inescapable impasse, or perhaps as a token gesture of compli-
ance with the requirements of the epideictic situation" (Blum, The Other Modernism, p. 142).
?"':?~'?:?.,:?::Piii:::::?lii:.E,.:ii,
: ::?':? ??::?:?::iia:i:iil ;:?
:.: ,. :;:i::: :::ii::t::'i: .'il ..:: 'i''::ii:;l??.:: ''
??''??;??
;:i.???
:' '?? ?
? :
:''::????:?? ::??:??
ii??:i;:i? ??:.??..:
:'? ???i: ?'??? ? ? ? ? ::? ? ?
"?:?: :?' ??
:. ?::;:?.????:??:?
;: ??"
?? i
:: : :
?? I??i ???';? ::
"' :?'???
"'""'':': '
?:::??i.l?: ;::.:? ...?;
;EF9
i???. ?.:;:.:i:.??..
.:??li::q;:?II:?;ji'' ???: :;:.
?::i:?:I:::::?:~?:? ??:?:??? ?:?.'? .:::':?:':i:d ?*?? '
?:?. :.??.: :i
"''
..i:?:??~?: *?
:::?i:: i?:.????:
:::?.:i:i:::li(:::..:....:.....?:..... :.:; .:i. i::.:':: i.*jlsli)l:
?::: :? ?~?????:'??;::?l:?il.iii:'::":? '.:?'? ?
textiles like Cafioc (based on hemp), Lanital (based on casein), and Gines-
tra (based on the broom plant) whose large-scale production began in
1936. The success of each of these products varied, but, success or no
success, they were featured as the stars of the decade's two most impor-
tant textile exhibitions: the National Textile Exhibition of Forli (held in
mid-December 1936) (figs. 24, 25, and 26) and the National Textile Exhi-
bition of Rome (inaugurated one year later at the Circus Maximus on the
two-year anniversary of the imposition of sanctions) (figs. 27 and 28).65
Organized by industry but attended by large masses of spectators, these
events ensured the widespread public diffusion of the story line of The
Non-Human Poem of Technicisms, its technical vocabulary, and its materialist
65. On the Forli exhibition, the best source is Federazione Nazionale dei Consorzi per
la Difesa della Canapicoltura, Le fibre tessili nazionali e dell'Impero (Milan, 1937), which
includes the technical reports presented at an accompanying symposium, reports on the pres-
ence of dignitaries and foreignjournalists, and reports on Mussolini's visit, as well as room-by-
room descriptions of the exhibition. No catalogue was apparently produced for the Circus
Maximus exhibition, but the event was lavishly covered in the contemporary press-nowhere
better than in the December 1937 issue ofLa rivista illustrata delpopolo d'lItalia.
?;.i;;.i~;... ..........
i ,
R IP . .....
m Vo.MR
*oow No
Owl'
.. . .......
.........
FIGS. 24,
From Fede
nazionali e
Florida an
I::i I
:'i
ii:'i
III
~aa~
v???
Ji~i
t i:?s..
?~01~C ? ~F$~~ '~ilt~BP~ ~s ?T~g ~ 9'?"'F'Ii
~ii i*s:
:iii2ir
r
i -rr
r
?:??:???ii?? ~DJ~?
FIG. 25
2:
iai
....... .... .
. . . ... ..
??:2-.AP
.... .. .. .
. .......
:li~ii;6.:iB9w e'll.:
:iv7 X-n,
j::
FIG. 26
women, animals, and natural products, all in the service of a sort of indus-
trial magic realism aiming to reconcile an idealized rural Italy with an
aggressive vision of the new civilization of machines. The exhibition hall
was thus transformed into a virtual factory where spectators could see,
touch, and smell the alchemy of modern textile production: from the raw
materials with which the process started out; to their preparation in caus-
tic soda baths; to their chemical processing; to the spinning and weaving
process; to the folding and cutting of the finished product; to its conver-
. . ..... . WE
FIG. 27
? .: : ?: i : . i I:E :g
:...:................. ..
:.
FIGS. 27 and 28.-Two parts of the SNIA Viscosa pavilion at the National Textile Exhi-
bition of Rome, 1937. Architect: Adalberto Libera. From La rivista illustrata del popolo d'Italia,
Dec. 1937.
........... ..
2el:?i
. . . . . . . . . . . . :
il~ l::i|!i!
-n, meiieii:i~iii
.N . A~:?:?: ~~:~?-:?: ???;-:?:
a M . . .........iil! iiifB ai
..... .......:':: '::
'o'%.I?~l~CtSt~il l:i~i
FIG. 29
... . .....
n :? Xi
"... ...........
....................
..... .........
........ ..... .. .
Ito ii
.........
.... .
* ;??ml
IIas WIN
I~P~II'Iliiir~MMMM81'
FIGS. 29 and 30.-Photomontages from the SNIA Viscosa's virtual factory at the
tional Textile Exhibition of Rome, originally devised by the painter Mondaini for th
Milan Trade Fair. From La rivista illustrata del popolo d'Italia, Dec. 1937.
sion into garments and everyday objects, first viewed in display cases and
then on live models parading down catwalks. All of this magic, needless
to say, unfolded under Mussolinian slogans such as "it is the spirit that
tames and molds matter" (E lo spirito che doma e piega la materia), under
images of the supreme leader, or under shimmering emblems of the key-
word autarchia.
More could be said about the Forli and Circus Maximus national
textile exhibitions, but their ties to Marinetti's technicist poetics can best
be understood by noting the remarkable degree to which The Non-Human
Poem of Technicisms converges with viewers' responses to these two shows.
One example will have to suffice: a review of the Circus Maximus show
published in the weekly Meridiano di Roma quoted above. The reviewer
begins by asserting that "less than an exhibition, it is a rally": a mass rally
orchestrated and choreographed by a creative force and genius emanat-
ing from Piazza Venezia ("PA," p. 12). Then, after lauding the technical,
economic, social, lyrical, and statistical inspiration the show provided its
audience, the reviewer describes the natural fabric Ginestra:
Never has nature been so closely tied to the textile industry as to-
day.... The gentle broom plant, as Leopardi had prophesied, bows
its innocent head, but virtuoso machines and primitive spools trans-
form it into textiles just as pristine and resistant as linen but naturally
perfumed.67 ["PA," p. 12]
67. Leopardi's most famous poem, a poem known by heart by every Italian school-
child, was entitled "La ginestra" ("The Broom Plant"). The conceit was borrowed from
Mussolini who, in a 23 March 1936 speech in the Campidoglio, had declared: "The broom
plant that grows wild everywhere ... known to Italians only because Leopardi dedicated
one of his most pathos-filled poems to it, has today become a textile fiber capable of indus-
trial production" (quoted in Aspesi, II lusso e l'autarchia, p. 77).
68. The link between industrial weaving and creative writing, already invoked in the
3 August letter from Marinotti of the SNIA Viscosa to Marinetti, recurs in an anonymous
write-up on the wool production section of the Circus Maximus exhibition, entitled "The
This transfiguring milk which is at once poetry's source and its end prod-
uct is cast as the hero of The Poem of the Milk Dress, which begins:
Wool Novel": "[in addition to industrial machinery and botany] music also enters the pic-
ture, if only through an indirect action; for he was wise who stated that one cannot achieve
greatness in industry without the spark of art animating the creations of pure thought. This
is how it was with [the] Marzotto [wool works]. There is no doubt about it. In the epic of its
factories fanfares sound and poetry flashes" ("Il romanzo della lana," La rivista illustrata del
popolo d'Italia, no. 12 [Dec. 1937]: 78-79). The author later continues by rehearsing, one by
one, the "chapters of the wool novel, brimming over with so much fantasy and poetry freely
bestowed upon actual novelists" (ibid., p. 80).
69. Marinetti, "Poesia simultanea di un vestito di latte," II Poema non umano dei tecnici-
smi, in Teoria e invenzionefuturista, p. 1164; hereafter abbreviated "PVL."
70. In late 1935 Marinetti had volunteered to serve in the Ethiopian campaign, so the
return from Africa figures events that occurred in early 1936. The Coliseum scenes seem
to allude to the celebrations held in honor of the two-thousand-year anniversary of the birth
of Augustus Caesar, held in Rome in tandem with the Mostra Augustea della Romanita, a
year-long exhibition marking the anniversary (23 Sept. 1937-23 Sept. 1938).
The separation of cheese from whey and casein from water, treated
both with humor and high drama in this modernist reworking of the
Genesis story of the separation of land from water, yields ever-increas-
ingly solid masses, then luminous threads, and finally fabrics that still
bear the trace of their luminous milky origins. After numerous pages of
oddly abstract yet sensuous descriptions of the struggle of threads to
achieve their ultimate form, the poem closes with a celebration of the
happy fusion of hard and soft, first in a heroic human subject,
culiar composite of matter and spirit: the human embryo." The Non-
Human Poem of Technicisms thus returns to an archaic scene of human ori-
gins in order to proclaim more forcefully a nonhuman future in which all
originary milks have coagulated, been spun into imperial uniforms wor-
thy of fear and honor, and assumed a wondrous multiplicity of mechani-
cal forms.
Appendix
71. The classic formulation of this doctrine can be found in Aristotle's treatise on the
generation of animals:
When the material secreted by the female in the uterus has been fixed by the semen
of the male (this acts in the same way as rennet acts upon milk, for rennet is a kind
of milk containing vital heat, which brings into one mass and fixes the similar mate-
rial, and the relation of the semen to the menstrual blood in the same, milk and the
menstrual blood being of the same nature)-when, I say, the more solid part comes
together, the liquid is separated off from it, and as the earthy parts solidify mem-
branes form all round it; this is both a necessary result and for the sake of something,
the former because the surface of a mass must solidify on heating as well as on cool-
ing, the latter because the foetus must not be in a liquid but be separated from it.
[Aristotle, Generation of Animals, trans. A. Platt, Complete Works of Aristotle, 2 vols., ed.
Jonathan Barnes (Princeton, N.J., 1984), 1:1148 (2.4.739b.20-30)]
72. On this topic, in addition to Crispolti and Braun on Italian futurism, see, for
example, Sigrid Weltge-Wortmann, Women's Work: Textile Art from the Bauhaus (San Francisco,
1993); Charlotte Douglas, "Russian Fabric Design, 1928-32," The Great Utopia: The Russian
and Soviet Avant-Garde 1915-1932 (New York, 1992), pp. 634-48; The Werkbund: History and
Ideology, 1907-1933, trans. Pearl Sanders, ed. Lucius Burckhardt (Woodbury, N.Y, 1980);
and Otto Charles Thieme, Avant-Garde by the Yard: Cutting Edge Textile Design, 1880-1930
(Cincinnati, 1996).
73. Marinetti, typescript, E T. Marinetti Papers, accession no. 920092, box 6, folder
29.
to cheek" with the sun, fulfilling the thwarted dream of Daedalus, artificer of artifi-
cers (fig. 31).
74. Marinetti's anti-Nordic polemic represents the flip side of his pro-Mediterranean
campaigns of the 1930s. Though its roots extend back to the intense anti-Austrian and anti-
German sentiments of futurism's pro-interventionist activities before World War I, it be-
came particularly pronounced in documents such as Thayaht and Marinetti's "First Futurist
Manifesto of Italian Fashion" (1932): "Until now, the Nordic capitals (London, Paris, New
York, Berlin) have laid down the law as concerns all aspects of modern dress, whether for
men or for women. The time has come for a new turn in world taste and it is incumbent
upon Italy to bring the joys of sleekness, speed, and color to the masses assembled in public
squares, theaters, and on the boulevards" (Thayaht and Marinetti, "First Futurist Manifesto
of Italian Fashion," typescript, E T. Marinetti Papers, accession no. 850702, folder 172, p. 1).
75. "Royal Venice" here refers to greater Venice, including the Friuli region, the loca-
tion of the SNIA Viscosa's Torviscosa facilities.
76. Much like Hitler's Autobahn system, the autostrada system was one of Mussolini's
showpiece public works projects. Marinetti's mention of it here is suggestive, inasmuch as
road building will be the topic of two other poems contained in The Non-Human Poem of
Technicisms: "Simultaneous Poem of the Coastal Highway Dressed in Wheels" ("Poesia sim-
ultanea della litoranea vestita di ruote") and "Simultaneous Poem of the Coastal Highway
Speed Watering Trough" ("Poesia simultanea della litoranea abbeveratoio di velocith").
Both come immediately after the "Simultaneous Poem of a Milk Dress" and further develop
the weaving/road building connection: in the first, the coastal highway is imagined as a
"long long brown loom with leaping black automobile spools that pumps out the brand new
textile like a train" (Marinetti, "Poesia simultanea della litoranea vestita di ruote," II Poema
non umano dei tecnicismi,in Teoria e invenzione futurista, p. 1171); in the second, the poet sees
"bobbins bobbins of rolled-up roadways liquefying themselves into ribbons of breathtaking
lightness" (Marinetti, "Poesia simultanea della Litoranea abbeveratoio di velocit," II Poema
non umano dei tecnicismi, in Teoria e invenzione futurista, p. 1177).
77. The Italian word is esterofilia, or "foreignophilia": an increasingly important Mari-
nettian theme during the fascist decades.
.......... .....
"'W'p
I~iitH aii ^~'?8sO ''~~L..............;??
'::I::'''".. ...........:
""... ... ........ .
.. .. . .. .
......... ...
MA?:':'?':;'"" ?::
:'''?o
M
..........
HP: ?:?'~~:~::~~:?:::
..No
~?: ,,xN-A:""::":'
m?
'""::::"':"*::'':;'':?': '::?"":'::i': MTV"
. . . . . . . . . .;: ??::
FIG. 31.-"Weaving an empire through exports." Display from the National Texti
Exhibition of Rome. From La rivista illustrata del popolo d'Italia, Dec. 1937.
78. The word primato encompasses meanings that include the notions of supremacy,
sovereignty, preeminence, and the achievement of a championship or record (in the sense
of "land speed record").
79. The Italian term is macerantesi, literally a reference to the process in which the
cellulose is detached by being steeped or slaked, like flax or hemp, so as to remove the fiber
from the woody tissue of the reeds; the technical term for this process is retting. The overlap
between this text and "Simultaneous Poem of Woven Light" begins with this passage.
80. Among the most active fronts during World War I, the Trentine front was the site
of much of Marinetti's military service.
81. Marinetti's use of liquidarsi in the sense of "to liquefy" is archaizing. In standard
usage the term means "to liquidate," in the sense of liquidating debts or of annihilating.
82. In the original, santogenato, a learned technical term based on the Greek xanthds
(yellow), referring here to a viscous, golden brown solution whose principal ingredient was
cellulose xanthate in a sodium hydroxide solution.
squared-off basins filled with sulphuric acid and sodium sulfate where
the viscose, now beatified thanks to its latest transfiguration and fully
filtered through sheets of wadding, enjoys a final rest before its defini-
tive travail.
Up to this point its mysterious day has unfolded under science's
watchful eye and its molecular weight remains unknown and will remain
so until after the impending marvel.
The vast hall thrusts in my face the feverish multiple noisemaking83
of spinning machines to a depth of three hundred meters.
Air of urgency of battles and revolutionary rallies so greatly do the
double files of bobbing bobbins resemble orators' shouting mouths and
machine gun barrels. All are aimed at the fearless observer who is deter-
mined to find out at any cost why and how in the aforementioned filtra-
tion process the solution that has now been extruded through a golden
spinneret84 coagulates into a thread leaping up onto the bobbin around
which it speedily coils. One meter per second.
Prodigy of this convulsive repetition of infinite prodigies. Imperturb-
ability of machines that command other machines in military fashion. On
rails massive cars roll by spitting up the insolent animality of radiant silk.
To the touch hands are fooled into enjoying fresh bread or the warm
flesh of a beautiful woman.85
They vanish in the ample hall devoted to the twisting of threads.86
The scent of sulphur becomes one with the orange-colored taste battling
the furious din of cicadas on red-hot August roadways.
Chirping insanely drunk in fact with uncontainable joy the other
thousand wheels stage a mock bicycle race seen from a glass-ceilinged
basement.
Hilarity hilarity inexaustible hilarity of wheels happy to have de-
feated the sacred silkworm mantled in Chinese regality.
The hilarity spreads to motors in the adjoining room that stir up a
tidal wave of resplendent skeins. Their boiling and frenzied desulphuriza-
tion and their deeply affecting joyous bleachings find expression in a
83. In the original, polirumorismo. The term refers back to Luigi Russolo's 1913 mani-
festo, The Art of Noise. See Luigi Russolo, L'arte dei rumori: Manifesto futurista (Milan, 1913).
84. The process being described is the literal spinning of the rayon that here, as in
present industrial practice, is accomplished by forcing chemically treated cellulose through
tiny apertures in thimble-shaped platinum nozzles known as spinnerets. (The latter term is
borrowed from the insect world, referring to the organs with which insects such as silk-
worms and caterpillars produce silk or thread.) The resulting rayon filament is subsequently
hardened by drying or by chemical treatment, and/or is cut into short lengths that are then
woven into yarn.
85. In the original, femmina, a term that bears stronger animal, and therefore sexual,
connotations than donna.
86. The reference is to a process technically akin to the torcitura della seta or "throwing
of silk," by means of which processed filaments are twisted into threads.
87. The typescript reads "schioppi di frusta" or, literally, "carbine of whip," one of
several transcription errors that I have had to correct. Schiocchi difrusta is the correct form
of the expression.
88. The overlap with "Simultaneous Poem of Woven Light" ends with this sentence.
89. The references are to various key members of Marinetti's futurist entourage: the
painters and set designers Enrico Prampolini (1894-1956) and Depero (1892-1960);
Benedetta Marinetti Cappa (1897-1977), Marinetti's wife and the author of Viaggio di Gar-
ard: Romanzo cosmico per teatro (1931) and Astra e il sottomarino: Vito trasognata (1935); the
painter Gerardo Dottori (1884-1977); the painter and sculptor Fillia (Luigi Colombo;
1904-36); the painter Tato (Guglielmo Sansoni; 1896-1974); and the graphic artist, de-
signer, and painter Bruno Munari (1907-), responsible for the original layout of The Poem
of the Milk Dress.
90. The original reads "compensati di metallo." Compensato occurs more commonly in
phrases such as legno compensato (plywood) and here appears to refer to the relatively recent
practice of building airplane bodies out of pop-riveted metallic skins.
91. The analogy is stronger than it might at first appear since rayon comes in short
and long thread varieties. Italrayon was the trademark developed by the SNIA Viscosa in
the early 1930s in order to confer a national identity upon its rayon products.
REFERENCES
Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article:
https://www.jstor.org/stable/1344165?seq=1&cid=pdf-
reference#references_tab_contents
You may need to log in to JSTOR to access the linked references.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Critical Inquiry
Fredric Jameson
1. See Giovanni Arrighi, The Long Twentieth Century: Money, Power, and the Origins of Our
Times (New York, 1994).
246
ern Marxism-a period one really needs to date from 1917-a complex
analysis of ideology needed to be developed in order to unmask the per-
sistent substitutions of incommensurate dimensions, the passing off of
political arguments in the place of economic ones, and the appeal to al-
leged traditions: freedom and democracy, God, Manichaeism, the values
of the West and of the Judeo-Christian or Roman-Christian heritage as
answers to new and unpredictable social experiments. This analysis was
also needed to accommodate the new conceptions of the operation of the
unconscious discovered by Freud and presumably at work in the layering
of social ideology. In those days the theory of ideology constituted the
better mousetrap. Every self-respecting theorist felt the obligation to in-
vent a new one, only to be met with ephemeral acclaim by curious specta-
tors always ready to move on to the next model at a moment's notice,
even when that next model meant revamping the very name of ideology
itself and substituting episteme, metaphysics, practices, or whatever.
But today many of these complexities seem to have disappeared, and
faced with the Reagan-Kemp and Thatcher utopias of immense in-
vestments and increases in production to come, based on deregulation,
privatization, and the obligatory opening of markets, we sense that the
problems of ideological analysis are enormously simplified, and the ideol-
ogies themselves far more transparent. Now that, following master think-
ers like Hayek, it has become customary to identify political freedom with
market freedom, the motivations behind ideology no longer seem to need
an elaborate machinery of decoding and hermeneutic reinterpretation;
and the guiding thread of all contemporary politics seems much easier to
grasp, namely, that the rich want their taxes lowered. This means that an
older vulgar Marxism may once again be more relevant to our situation
than the newer models; but we also face more objective problems about
money itself, which had seemed less relevant in the cold war period.
The rich were certainly doing something with all this new income
that no longer needed to be wasted on social services; rather than go into
new factories, it seemed to get invested in the stock market. Whence a
second perplexity: The Soviets used to joke about the miracle of their
system, whose edifice seemed comparable only to those houses kept
standing by the swarm of termites eating away inside them. But some of
us had the same feeling about the United States. After the disappearance
(or brutal downsizing) of heavy industry, the only thing that seemed to
keep it going (besides the two prodigious American industries of food
and entertainment) was the stock market. How was this possible, and
where did the money keep coming from? And if money itself rested on so
fragile a basis, why did "fiscal responsibility" matter so much in the first
place, and on what was the very logic of monetarism itself grounded?
The dawning suspicion that we were in a new period of finance capi-
talism was not given much theoretical encouragement or nourishment by
the tradition. One old book, Rudolf Hilferding's Finance Capital of 1910,
seemed to give a historical analysis of an economic and a structural situa-
tion: the techniques of the great German trusts of the pre-World War I
period and their relations with the banks and eventually the Flottenbau
required the concept of monopoly, which Lenin appropriated in this
sense for his 1916 pamphlet Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism.2 It
too seemed to do away with finance capital by changing its name and
displacing it onto the power relations and competition between the great
capitalist states. But these "highest stages" now lie well in our own past;
imperialism is gone, replaced by neocolonialism and globalization; the
great international financial centers do not (yet) seem the locus of fero-
cious competition among the nations of the capitalist First World, despite
a few complaints about the Bundesbank and its interest policies; imperial
Germany meanwhile has been replaced by a Federal Republic that may
or may not be more powerful than its predecessor but that is now part of
an allegedly united Europe. So these historical descriptions do not seem
to do us much good, and here the teleological ("highest stage") does seem
fully to merit all the opprobrium called down upon it in recent years.
But where the economist could only give us empirical history, it re-
mained for a historical narrative to give us the structural and economic
theory we needed to solve this conundrum. Finance capital has to be
something like a stage in the way it distinguishes itself from other mo-
ments of the development of capitalism. Arrighi's luminous insight was
that this peculiar kind of telos need not lie in a straight line but might
well organize itself in a spiral (a figure that also avoids the mythical over-
tones of the various cyclical visions).
It is a picture that unites various traditional requirements. Capital-
ism's movement must be seen as discontinuous but expansive. With each
crisis, it mutates into a larger sphere of activity and a wider field of pene-
tration, of control, investment, and transformation. This doctrine, most
forcefully argued by Ernest Mandel in his great book Late Capitalism, has
the merit of accounting for capitalism's resiliency,3 which Marx himself
already posited in the Grundrisse (but which is less evident in Capital itself)
and which has repeatedly unsettled left prognostications (immediately
after World War II and then again in the 1980s and 1990s). But the objec-
tion to Mandel's positions has turned on the latent teleology of his slogan
2. See Rudolf Hilferding, Finance Capital, trans. Morris Watnick and Sam Gordon
(1910; Boston, 1981), and V. I. Lenin, Imperialism: The Highest Stage of Capitalism, trans. pub.
(New York, 1939).
3. See Ernest Mandel, Late Capitalism, trans. Joris De Bres (New York, 1975).
late capitalism, as though this were the last stage conceivable, or as though
the process were some uniform historical progression. (My own use of the
term is meant as a homage to Mandel and not particularly as a prophetic
forecast; Lenin does say "highest," as we have seen, while Hilferding,
more prudently, simply calls it the '"jingste," the latest or most recent,
which is obviously preferable.)
The cyclical scheme now allows us to coordinate these features. If we
position discontinuity not only in time but also in space, and if we add
back in the historian's perspective, which clearly enough needs to reckon
with the national situations and the uniquely idiosyncratic developments
within the national states, let alone within the greater regional groupings
(Third versus First Worlds, for example), then the local teleologies of the
capitalist process can be reconciled with its own spasmodic historical de-
velopments and mutations as they leap from geographical space to
space.
Thus, the system is better seen as a kind of virus (not Arrighi's fig-
ure), and its development is something like an epidemic (better still, a
rash of epidemics, an epidemic of epidemics). The system has its own
logic, which powerfully undermines and destroys the logic of more tradi-
tional or precapitalist societies and economies. Deleuze and Guattari call
this an axiomatic, as opposed to the older precapitalist, tribal, or imperial
codes.4 But epidemics also play themselves out, like a fire for want of
oxygen; and they also leap to new and more propitious settings, in which
the preconditions are favorable to renewed development. (I hasten to add
that Arrighi's complex political and economic articulation of these para-
doxical turns, whereby winners lose and losers sometimes win, is far more
dialectical than my figures suggest.)
Thus, in the new scheme of The Long Twentieth Century, capitalism has
known any number of false starts and fresh starts, on an ever larger scale.
Bookkeeping in Renaissance Italy, the nascent commerce of the great
city-states: these phenomena and others evidently occurred in a petri dish
of modest proportions, which does not allow the new thing much in the
way of scope but which offers a still relatively restricted and sheltered
environment. The political form, here, the city-state itself, stands as an
obstacle and a limit to development, although this observation should not
be extrapolated into a thesis about the way in which form (the political)
restricts content (the economic). Then the process that is capitalism leaps
over into Spain, where Arrighi's great insight lies in the analysis of this
leap as an essentially symbiotic moment. We knew that Spain had an ear-
lier form of capitalism, of course, which was disastrously undermined by
the conquest of the New World and the fleets of silver. But Arrighi stresses
the way in which Spanish capitalism is to be understood in close func-
4. See Gilles Deleuze and FMlix Guattari, A Thousand Plateaus, trans. Brian Massumi,
vol. 2 of Capitalism and Schizophrenia (Minneapolis, 1987), p. 461.
5. John Hicks, A Theory of Economic History (Oxford, 1969); quoted in Arrighi, The Long
Twentieth Century, p. 94.
6. Fernand Braudel, The Perspective of the World (New York, 1984); quoted in ibid., p. 6.
7. See Paul A. Baran and Paul M. Sweezy, Monopoly Capital: An Essay on the American
Economic and Social Order (New York, 1966).
8. See Jacques Derrida, Specters of Marx: The State of the Debt, the Work of Mourning, and
the New International, trans. Peggy Kamuf (New York, 1994).
9. See Georg Simmel, "The Metropolis and Mental Life," On Individuality and Social
Forms: Selected Writings, ed. Donald N. Levine (Chicago, 1971), pp. 324-39.
10. See Fredric Jameson, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act
(Ithaca, N.Y., 1981).
11. See C. B. MacPherson, The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism: Hobbes to Locke
(Oxford, 1964).
12. See Arnold Hauser, The Social History ofArt, trans. Hauser and Stanley Godman, 2
vols. (New York, 1951).
13. St6phane Mallarme, "Le Mystere dans les lettres" Divagations (Paris, 1917), p. 289;
trans. Bradford Cook, under the title "Mystery in Literature," Mallarnu: Selected Prose Poems,
Essays, and Letters (Baltimore, 1956), p. 32: "What sure guide is there to intelligibility in the
midst of these contrasts? What guarantee? Syntax."
14. See Erich Auerbach, Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature, trans.
Willard Trask (Garden City, N.Y., 1953).
15. See Harry Braverman, Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the
Twentieth Century (New York, 1974).
anxieties of the absurd, to take only one example, are themselves recap-
tured and recontained by a new and postmodern cultural logic, which
offers them for consumption fully as much as its other seemingly more
anodyne exhibits.
It is thus to this new break that we must turn our attention, and it is
in its theorization that Arrighi's analysis of finance capitalism makes a
signal contribution, which I first propose to examine in terms of the cate-
gory of abstraction itself and in particular of the peculiar form of abstrac-
tion that is money. Worringer's pathbreaking essay on abstraction linked
it to distinct cultural impulses and concluded that it finally drew its force
from the intensifying assimilation of more ancient and nonfigurative vis-
ual materials into the West's "imaginary museum," which he associates
with a kind of death drive. But the crucial intervention for our purposes
is Simmel's "The Metropolis and Mental Life," in which the processes of
the new industrial city, very much including the abstract flows of money,
determine a whole new and more abstract way of thinking and perceiv-
ing, radically different from the object world of the older merchant cities
and countryside. What is at stake here is a dialectical transformation of
the effects of exchange value and monetary equivalence; if the latter had
once announced and provoked a new interest in the properties of objects,
now in this new stage equivalence has as its result a withdrawal from older
notions of stable substances and their unifying identifications. Thus, if all
these objects have become equivalent as commodities, if money has lev-
eled their intrinsic differences as individual things, one may now pur-
chase as it were their various, henceforth semiautonomous qualities or
perceptual features; and both color and shape free themselves from their
former vehicles and come to live independent existences as fields of per-
ception and as artistic raw materials. This is then a first stage, but only a
first one, in the onset of an abstraction that becomes identified as aes-
thetic modernism but that in hindsight should be limited to the historical
period of the second stage of capitalist industrialization-that of oil and
electricity, the combustion engine and the new velocities and technologies
of the motorcar, the steamship and the flying machine-in the decades
immediately preceding and following the turn of the century.
But before continuing this dialectical narrative, we need to return to
Arrighi for a moment. We have already spoken of the imaginative way in
which Arrighi exfoliates Marx's famous formula M-C-M' into a supple
and cyclical historical narrative. Marx began, as will be remembered, with
an inversion of another formula C-M-C, which characterizes commerce
as such: "the simple circulation of commodities begins with a sale and
ends with a purchase." 16 The merchant sells a commodity and with the
16. Karl Marx, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, trans. Ben Fowkes, 2 vols. (Har-
mondsworth, 1976), 1:249.
17. Ibid.
logical and free-floating state, one in which the content (to revert to Heg-
elian language) has definitively been suppressed in favor of the form, in
which the inherent nature of the product becomes insignificant, a mere
marketing pretext, while the goal of production no longer lies in any spe-
cific market, any specific set of consumers or social and individual needs,
but rather in its transformation into that element which by definition has
no context or territory, and indeed no use value as such, namely, money.
So it is that in any specific region of production, as Arrighi shows us,
there comes a moment in which the logic of capitalism-faced with the
saturation of local and even foreign markets-determines an abandon-
ment of that kind of specific production, along with its factories and
trained workforce, and, leaving them behind in ruins, takes its flight to
other more profitable ventures.
Or rather that moment is a dual one, and it is in this demonstration
of the two stages of deterritorialization that I see Arrighi's most funda-
mental originality and also his most suggestive contribution for cultural
analysis today. There is a deterritorialization in which capital shifts to
other and more profitable forms of production, often enough in new geo-
graphical regions. Then there is the grimmer conjuncture, in which the
capital of an entire center or region abandons production altogether in
order to seek maximization in nonproductive spaces, which as we have
seen are those of speculation, the money market, and finance capital in
general. Of course, here the word deterritorialization can celebrate its own
kinds of ironies; for one of the privileged forms of speculation today is
that of land and city space. The new postmodern informational or global
cities (as they have been called) thus result very specifically from the ulti-
mate deterritorialization, that of territory as such-the becoming abstract
of land and the earth, the transformation of the very background or con-
text of commodity exchange into a commodity in its own right. Land
speculation is therefore one face of a process whose other one lies in the
ultimate deterritorialization of globalization itself, where it would be a
great mistake to imagine something like the globe as yet a new and larger
space replacing the older national or imperial ones. Globalization is
rather a kind of cyberspace in which money capital has reached its ulti-
mate dematerialization, as messages that pass instantaneously from one
nodal point to another across the former globe, the former material
world.
I now want to offer some speculations as to the way in which this
new logic of finance capital-its radically new forms of abstraction, in
particular, which are sharply to be distinguished from those of modern-
ism as such-can be observed to operate in cultural production today or,
in other words, in what people have come to call postmodernity. What is
wanted is an account of abstraction in which the new deterritorialized
postmodern contents are to an older modernist autonomization as global
financial speculation is to an older kind of banking and credit, or as the
stock market frenzies of the eighties are to the Great Depression. I don't
particularly want to introduce the theme of the gold standard here, which
fatally suggests a solid and tangible kind of value as opposed to various
forms of paper and plastic (or information on your computer). Or, per-
haps, the theme of gold would become relevant again only to the degree
that it was also grasped as an artificial and contradictory system in its own
right. What we want to be able to theorize is a modification in the very
nature of cultural tokens and the systems they operate in. If modernism
is a kind of cancelled realism, as I have suggested, one which segments
and differentiates some initial mimetic starting point, then it might be
likened to a largely accepted paper money, whose inflationary ups and
downs suddenly lead to the introduction of financial and speculative in-
struments and vehicles.
I want to examine this point of historical change in terms of the frag-
ment and its destiny throughout these various cultural moments. The
rhetoric of the fragment has been with us since the dawn of what the
Schlegels identified as modernism. It will be understood that I think it is
something of a misnomer, since the image contents in question are the
result, not of breakage, incompletion, or extreme wear and tear, but
rather of analysis. But the word is convenient for want of a better one,
and I'll go on using it in this brief final discussion. I want to begin by
recalling Ken Russell's seemingly jocular remark that in the twenty-first
century all fiction films will last no longer than fifteen minutes apiece;
the implication is that in a Late Show culture like our own, the elaborate
preparations we used to require in order to apprehend a series of images
as a story of some kind will be, for whatever reason, unnecessary. But
actually I think this can be documented by our own experience. Everyone
who still visits movie theaters has become aware of the way in which inten-
sified competition by the film industry for now-inveterate television view-
ers has led to a transformation in the very structure of the preview. It has
had to be developed and expanded, becoming a far more comprehensive
teaser for the film than it formerly was. At length the viewer of these
enforced coming attractions (five or six of them precede every feature
presentation and replace the older kinds of shorts) is led to make a mo-
mentous discovery, namely, that the preview is really all you need. You
no longer need to see the "full" two-hour version (unless the object is to
kill time, which it so often is). Nor is this something that has to do with
the quality of the film (although it may have something to do with the
quality of the preview, the better ones being cunningly arranged in such
a way that the story they seem to tell is not the same as the "real story" in
the "real film"). Nor does this new development have much to do with
knowing the plot or the story, for, in any case, in contemporary action
films, the story has become little more than a pretext on which to suspend
a perpetual present of thrills and explosions. Thus these images are pro-
vided in the seemingly brief anthology of shots and highlights offered by
the preview, and they are fully satisfying in themselves, without the bene-
fit of the laborious threads and connections of the former plot. At that
point it would seem that the preview, as a structure and a work in its
own right, bears something of the same relationship to its supposed final
product, as a novelized film, written after the fact of the movie and pub-
lished later on as a kind of xeroxed reminder, is to the filmic original it
replicates. The difference is that in the case of the feature film and its
book version we are dealing with completed narrative structures of a simi-
lar type, structures similarly antiquated by these new developments.
Whereas the preview is a new form, a new kind of minimalism, whose
generic satisfactions are distinct from the older kind. It would thus seem
that Russell was imperfectly prophetic in his forecast: not in the twenty-
first century, but already in this one; and not fifteen minutes, but only
two or three!
Of course, what he had in mind was something rather different, for
he was evoking MTV, whose imaginative representations of music in vis-
ual analogues find their immediate predecessors, less in Disney and in
music animation, than in television commercials as such, which can at
their best achieve an aesthetic quality of great intensity. I want however
to turn in a more familiar direction (partly because of the difficulty of
illustrating ephemera of that kind) and to juxtapose an older practice of
the image fragment with this newer one. It thus seems instructive to con-
trast the full currency of Bufiuel's surrealist films, An Andalusian Dog
(1928) and The Golden Age (1930), or of the very different experimental
filmmaking of Stan Brakhage's Dog Star Man (1965), with the junk bonds
of Derek Jarman's epic Last of England (1987).
As a matter of fact, we ought to note in passing that Jarman also
expressed the same formal interest in the innovations of MTV as Russell,
but, unlike him, Jarman deplored the temporal restrictions of the new
mode and dreamed of an immense epic-length deployment of this image
language, something he was to put into practice in just such a work as
the ninety-minute Last of England (the longer films by Bufiuel and Brak-
hage run some sixty-two and seventy-five minutes respectively, but it is
the comparative quality of their interminabilities that is here in question).
Yet, even in the modern, the practice of the fragment resulted in two
distinct and antithetical tendencies or strategies: the minimalism of We-
bern or Beckett on the one hand, and the infinite temporal expansion
of Mahler or Proust on the other. Here, in what some people call the
postmodern, we might want to juxtapose the brevity of the Russell con-
ception of MTV with the epic temptations of Jarman or the literal inter-
minability of a text like Gravity's Rainbow.
But what I want to bring out, for this speculative discussion of the
cultural impact of finance capital, is a rather different property of such
image fragments. It seems appropriate to characterize those of Bufiuel,
working at the very center of the classical modern movement, as a prac-
18. Deleuze, Cinema 1: The Movement-Image, trans. Hugh Tomlinson and Barbara Hab-
berjam (Minneapolis, 1986), p. 125.
19. See Roland Barthes, Mythologies, trans. Annette Lavers (New York, 1972).
tute a language or a dimension in its own right. But that is precisely what
finance capital brings into being: a play of monetary entities that need
neither production (as capital does) nor consumption (as money does),
which supremely, like cyberspace, can live on their own internal metabo-
lisms and circulate without any reference to an older type of content. But
so do the narrativized image fragments of a stereotypical postmodern
language; they suggest a new cultural realm or dimension that is inde-
pendent of the former real world, not because as in the modern (or even
the romantic) period culture withdrew from that real world into an au-
tonomous space of art, but rather because the real world has already been
suffused with culture and colonized by it, so that it has no outside in
terms of which it could be found lacking. Stereotypes are never lacking
in that sense, and neither is the total flow of the circuits of financial specu-
lation. That each of these also steers unwittingly towards a crash I leave
for another essay and another time.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and
extend access to Critical Inquiry
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Books and Discs of Critical Interest
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Critical Inquiry Autumn 1997 267
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
268 Books and Discs of Critical Interest
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Critical Inquiry Autumn 1997 269
Daniel, Jamie Owen and Tom Moylan, eds. Not Yet: Reconsidering Ernst
Bloch. New York: Verso, 1997. 246 pp. $20.00.
Demers, Patricia. The World of Hannah Moore. Lexington: University Press
of Kentucky, 1997. 178 pp. $32.95.
DeShell, Jeffrey. The Peculiarity of Literature: An Allegorical Approach to Poe's
Fiction. Madison and Teaneck N.J.: Fairleigh Dickinson University
Press, 1997. $32.50.
Dickie, Margaret. Stein, Bishop, and Rich: Lyrics of Love, War, and Place.
Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1997. 234 pp. $45.00
(cloth); $16.95 (paper).
Didi-Huberman, Georges. Fra Angelico: Dissemblance and Figuration. Trans.
Jane Marie Todd. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997. 288
pp. $65.00.
Dirlik, Arif. The Postcolonial Aura: Third World Criticism in the Age of Global
Capitalism. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1997. 252 pp. $60.00.
Dobyns, Stephen. Best Words, Best Order: Essays on Poetry. New York: St.
Martin's Press, 1997. 338 pp. $16.95.
Dworkin, Dennis. Cultural Marxism in Postwar Britain: History, the New Left,
and the Origins of Cultural Studies. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press,
1997. 322 pp. $49.95 (cloth); $16.95 (paper).
Eagleton, Terry. Saint Oscar and Other Plays. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers,
1997. 232 pp. $22.95.
Ebbs, Gary. Rule-Following and Realism. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Uni-
versity Press, 1997. 368 pp. $42.50.
Egerer, Claudia. Fictions of (In) Betweenness. G6teberg, Sweden: Acta Uni-
versitatis Gothoburgensis, 1997. 199 pp.
Elkins, James. The Object Stares Back: On the Nature of Seeing. New York:
Harcourt, Brace, and Company, 1997. 271 pp. $13.00.
Ermann, M. David, Mary B. Williams, and Michele S. Shauf, eds. Com-
puters, Ethics, and Society. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
340 pp.
Faes, Rosa M. Manuel del Busto. Oviedo: Colegio Oficial de Arquitectos,
1997. 287 pp.
Falasca-Zamponi, Simonetta. Fascist Spectacle: The Aesthetics of Power in Mus-
solini's Italy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997. 303 pp.
$40.00.
Feldstein, Richard. Political Correctness: A Response from the Cultural Left.
Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1997. 232 pp. $18.95.
Ferrante, Joan M. To the Glory of Her Sex: Women's Roles in the Composition of
Medieval Texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1997. 304 pp.
$39.95 (cloth); $19.95 (paper).
Ferris, Lucy. Sleeping with the Boss: Female Subjectivity and Narrative Pattern
in Robert Penn Warren. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press,
1997. 169 pp. $27.00
Ferry, Luc and Alain Renaut, eds. Why We Are Not Nietzscheans. Trans. Rob-
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
270 Books and Discs of Critical Interest
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Critical Inquiry Autumn 1997 271
and ed. James G. Williams. New York: The Crossroad Publishing Com-
pany, 1997. 168 pp. $24.95.
Giroux, Henry A. Channel Surfing: Race Talk and the Destruction of Today's
Youth. New York: St. Martin's Press, 1997. 256 pp. $22.95.
Glazener, Nancy. Reading for Realism: The History of a U.S. Literary Institu-
tion, 1850-1910. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1997. 384 pp.
$54.95 (cloth); $18.95 (paper).
Gray, Chris Hables. Postmodern War: The New Politics of Conflict. New York:
Guilford Publications, 1997. 326 pp. $35.00.
Green, Archie. Calf's Head and Union Tale: Labor Yarns at Work and Play.
Champaign: University of Illinois Press, 1996. 283 pp. $34.95 (cloth);
$13.95 (paper).
Greenwald, Richard A., ed. Exploring America's Past: A Reader in Social, Po-
litical, and Cultural History, 1865-Present. Lanham, Md.: University Press
of America, 1997. 274 pp.
Griggers, Camilla. Becoming-Woman. Minneapolis: University of Minne-
sota Press, 1997. 154 pp.
Grosz-Ngat6, Maria and Omari H. Kokole, eds. Gendered Encounters: Chal-
lenging Cultural Boundaries and Social Hierarchies in Africa. New York:
Routledge, 1997. 254 pp. $65.00 (cloth); $18.95 (paper).
Gupta, Akhil and James Ferguson, eds. Culture, Power, Place: Explorations
in Critical Anthropology. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1997. 357
pp. $54.95 (cloth); $18.95 (paper).
Halliburton, David. The Fateful Discourse of Worldly Things. Stanford, Calif.:
Stanford University Press, 1997. 415 pp.
Ham, Jennifer and Matthew Senior, eds. Animal Acts: Configuring the Hu-
man in Western History. New York: Routledge, 1997. 258 pp. $69.95
(cloth); $17.95 (paper).
Handler, Richard and Eric Gable. The New History in an Old Museum: Creat-
ing the Past at Colonial Williamsburg. Durham, N.C.: Duke University
Press, 1997. 260 pp. $49.95 (cloth); $16.95 (paper).
Harris, Susan K. The Courtship of Olivia Langdon and Mark Twain. Cam-
bridge: Cambridge University Press, 1996. 242 pp. $59.95 (cloth);
$17.95 (paper).
Harrison, Antony H., ed. The Letters of Christina Rossetti: Volume 1, 1843-
1873. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 1997. 520 pp.
$49.50.
Hill, Mike, ed. Whiteness: A Critical Reader. New York: New York University
Press, 1997. 355 pp. $55.00 (cloth); $21.95 (paper).
Hillman, David and Carla Mazzio, eds. The Body in Parts: Fantasies of Corpo-
reality in Early Modern Europe. New York: Routledge, 1997. 344 pp.
$19.95.
Hillyer, Barbara. Feminism and Disability. Norman: University of Oklahoma
Press, 1997. 318 pp. $16.95
Hodgart, Matthew J. C. and Ruth Bauerle. Joyce's Grand Operoar: Opera in
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
272 Books and Discs of Critical Interest
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Critical Inquiry Autumn 1997 273
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
274 Books and Discs of Critical Interest
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Critical Inquiry Autumn 1997 275
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
276 Books and Discs of Critical Interest
ror Film Viewing. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997. 177
pp. $14.95.
Platt, Kevin M. E History in a Grotesque Key: Russian Literature and the Idea
of Revolution. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1997. 293
pp. $45.00.
Pointon, Marcia. Strategies for Showing: Women, Possession, and Representation
in English Visual Culture, 1665-1800. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
1997. 454 pp. $85.00.
Porter, Roy, ed. Rewriting the Self: Histories from the Renaissance to the Present.
New York: Routledge, 1997. 283 pp. $65.00 (cloth); $18.95 (paper).
Probyn, Elspeth. Outside Belongings. New York: Routledge, 1997. 189 pp.
$59.95 (cloth); $16.95 (paper).
Ransom, John S. Foucault's Discipline: The Politics of Subjectivity. Durham,
N.C.: Duke University Press, 1997. 240 pp. $49.95 (cloth); $16.95
(paper).
Reid, Mark A., ed. Spike Lee's "Do the Right Thing." Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1997. 176 pp. $49.95.
Reiser, Russell. Loose Ends: Closure and Crisis in the American Social Text. Dur-
ham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1997. 388 pp. $54.95 (cloth);
$18.95 (paper).
Rice, Grantland S. The Transformation of Authorship in America. Chicago:
University of Chicago Press, 1997. 242 pp. $42.00 (cloth); $16.95
(paper).
Rowe, John Carlos. At Emerson's Tomb: The Politics of Classic American Litera-
ture. New York: Columbia University Press, 1997. 318 pp. $49.50
(cloth); $16.50 (paper).
Rosario, Vernon A. Science and Homosexualities. New York: Routledge,
1997. 318 pp. $65.00 (cloth); $26.95 (paper).
Rudova, Larissa. Understanding Boris Pasternak. Columbia: University of
South Carolina Press, 1997.
Russell, John Malcolm. From Ninevah to New York: The Strange Story of the
Assyrian Reliefs in the Metropolitan Museum and the Hidden Masterpiece
at Canford School. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1997. 232
pp. $40.00.
Ryan, Mary P. Civic Wars: Democracy and Public Life in the American City dur-
ing the Nineteenth Century. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997.
388 pp. $27.50.
Saad, Joya Blondel. The Image of Arabs in Modern Persian Literature. Lan-
ham, Md.: University Press of America, 1997. 150 pp. $39.50 (cloth);
$28.50 (paper).
Salecl, Renata and Slavoj Zi ek, eds. Gaze and Voice as Love Objects. Dur-
ham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 1996. 264 pp. $49.95 (cloth);
$16.95 (paper).
Sawday, Jonathan. The Body Emblazoned: Dissection and the Human Body in
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Critical Inquiry Autumn 1997 277
Renaissance Culture. New York: Routledge, 1996. 327 pp. $45.00 (cloth);
$19.95 (paper).
Schehr, Lawrence R. Rendering French Realism. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford
University Press, 1997. 268 pp. $39.50.
Schmitt, Cannon. Alien Nation: Nineteenth-Century Gothic Fictions and En-
glish Nationality. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1997.
231 pp. $34.50.
Schwartz, David, Anahid Kassabian, and Lawrence Siegel, eds. Keeping
Score: Music, Disciplinarity, Culture. Charlottesville: University Press of
Virginia, 1997. 320 pp. $65.00 (cloth); $19.50 (paper).
Schwarz, David. Listening Subjects: Music, Psychoanalysis, Culture. Durham,
N.C.: Duke University Press, 1997. 211 pp. $49.95 (cloth); $17.95
(paper).
Scott, David. Pictorialist Poetics: Poetry and the Visual Arts in Nineteenth-
Century France. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997. 207 pp.
Scriven, Tal. Wrongness, Wisdom, and Wilderness: Toward a Libertarian Theory
of Ethics and the Environment. Albany: State University of New York
Press, 1997. 218 pp. $20.95.
Segal, Lynn, ed. New Sexual Agendas. New York: New York University
Press, 1997. 278 pp. $45.00 (cloth); $17.95 (paper).
Sellars, Wilfrid. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Introduction by
Richard Rorty. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1997. 181
pp. $35.00 (cloth); $17.95 (paper).
Siegel, James T. Fetish, Recognition, Revolution. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton
University Press, 1997. 275 pp. $55.00 (cloth); $22.50 (paper).
Silverstone, Roger, ed. Visions of Suburbia. New York: Routledge, 1997.
327 pp. $65.00 (cloth); $18.95 (paper).
Simon, William. Postmodern Sexualities. New York: Routledge, 1997. 179
pp. $65.00 (cloth); $17.95 (paper).
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein. Belief and Resistance: Dynamics of Contemporary
Intellectual Controversy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press,
1997. 249 pp. $37.50 (cloth); $17.95 (paper).
Smith, Barbara Herrnstein and Arkady Plonitsky, eds. Mathematics, Sci-
ence, and Postclassical Theory. Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press,
1997. 288 pp. $49.95 (cloth); $16.95 (paper).
Smith, Jeanne Rosier. Writing Tricksters: Mythic Gambols in American Ethnic
Literature. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1997. 211 pp.
$45.00 (cloth); $15.95 (paper).
Smith, Paul. Millenial Dreams: Contemporary Culture and Capital in the North.
New York: Verso, 1997. 288 pp. $19.00.
Soderholm, James. Beauty and the Critic: Aesthetics in an Age of Cultural Stud-
ies. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 1997. 229 pp. $35.95
(cloth); $19.95 (paper).
Sondheim, Alan, ed. Being on Line, Net Subjectivity. New York: Lusitania
Press, 1997. 208 pp. $15.00.
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
278 Books and Discs of Critical Interest
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Critical Inquiry Autumn 1997 279
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
280 Books and Discs of Critical Interest
Zilek, Slavoj and E W. J. Schelling. The Abyss of Freedom and Ages of the
World. Trans. Judith Norman. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan
Press, 1997. 182 pp. $42.50 (cloth); $17.95 (paper).
Zipes, Jack. Happily Ever After: Fairy Tales, Children, and the Culture Industry.
New York: Routledge, 1997. 181 pp. $15.95.
Zohn, Harry. Karl Kraus and the Critics. Columbia, S.C.: Camden House,
1997. 161 pp. $52.95.
This content downloaded from 148.63.195.42 on Mon, 14 Nov 2022 13:52:25 UTC
All use subject to https://about.jstor.org/terms
Back Matter
Source: Critical Inquiry , Autumn, 1997, Vol. 24, No. 1 (Autumn, 1997)
Published by: The University of Chicago Press
Stable URL: https://www.jstor.org/stable/1344167
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
The University of Chicago Press is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Critical Inquiry
Preparation of Copy:
Format of Footnotes:
HOWARD PINDERHUGHES
Race in the Hood
Conflict and Violence among Urban Youth
A compelling study of the origins of racial conflict and violence in
America.
K? NRY
Constructing Medieval Sexuality
A groundbreaking examination of sexuality in the Middle Ages.
$18.95 Paper (2829-7) $47.95 Cloth (2828-9) December
NAOKI SAKAI
Revisioning Italy
M:)i(=m ==mam'= mmm =m :m m
SCOTT HICHAELSEN AN
Border Theory
The Limits of Cultur
Explores the expan
emerging field of
$21.95 Paper (2963-3
WARREN MONTAG AN
The New Spino
Modeled on The Ne
thought of Spinoz
$24.95 Paper (2541-7
RAPHAEL SASSOWER
ISABELLE STENGERS
Power and Invention
Situating Science
Explores the interplay between science, society, and power.
. . ... ... ...
- Now in paperback
FATIMA MERNISSI
Also of interest
EYE STRYKER MUNSON AND CATHERINE A. WARREN, EDITORS
James Carey
A Critical Reader
An essential guide to the thought of a central figure in media studies.
$19.95 Paper (2703-7) $49.95 Cloth (2702-9) September
I
at bookstores or from
University of Minnesota Press
773-568-1 550
www.upress.umn.edu
UNIVERSITY
PRESS
ra-i
JAMES LONGENBACH transformations in value and meaning
Nietzsche's work underwent during the
P"AF~lM.R
.T.... ..-;: ?l Poet and critic James
Longenbach, rejecting the firstcentury of its reception in France.
LG tS "'breakthrough"narrative These transvaluations, Smith argues,
commonly used to define resulted as various critics. both swithin
American poetry after and outside the philosophical ctablinh-
modernism,. discusses poetsinent. contested Nietzsche' s thcoric,.
Elizabeth Bishop, Randall (Oxford Modern Langsuacs agnd l.ifc'rI ,,'
Jarrell,Richard Wilbur, John Ashbery,M.lonographs)
Amy Clampitt, Richard Howard, 1996 272 pp. $67.00
Robert Pinsky, and Jorie Graham,
offering readers a fresh way to experi-
ence the variety of poetries written in
our tine.
1997 224 pp.
paper $18.95 cloth $45.00
* The association continues its tradition of publishing quality reference works. The
1997-98 academic year will see the publication of both the third edition of James
L. Harner's highly regarded Literary Research Guide and the long-awaited index
volume to Wing's Short-Title Catalogue.
Ol Reinstating member
CR Income under $15,000 $25 ACADEMIC RANK AND DISCIPLINE (e.g., Grad Stud Eng, Asst Prof Comp Lit)
lViSA_
S E-MAIL ADDRESS (please print address exactly as it should appear on Internet e-mail)
SIGNATURE
MODERN LANGUAG
Non-US applicants: For faster processing, please use
Visa or MasterCard. International
money orders are also accepted.
All figures are in US dollars.
MR
Pennsylvania PRESS
SUSAN S. WILLIAMS
"The best study to date of
Poetic Will V
visual representation in
Shakespeare and the Play ofLanguage
antebellum American
DAVID WILLBERN
literature as stylistic practice
Using a combination of psychoanalytic and as market phenomenon."
approaches, Willbern transcends traditional
-Lawrence Buell, Harvard University
character analysis in order to attend to the $38.95 cloth
"play of language" in Shakespeare's texts.
$37.50 cloth AT BOOKSTORES OR CALL 1 800 445 9880
::Xvi X X
X. 4d~d
...................~~
ety of interdci aryross-cultural and
.... ........:~::::~::: ~ ~ ?~ critical conex ts ".:*
ago??8? ?M OF THE
VM
AMERICAS
re. .86
-23 83 1 ?8
mm Wmp. . .. ........
Textuality
-m' .08
U-M-.'
...................
Edited by
63?
'SUMP, .4 q.eo-."
... .... ......
Ar",
M
... ....
11.1
... ...
Illustrated
UNIVERSITY OF 35.00C cloth - s2.95 paper
SOUTH CAROLINA PRESS
205 Pickens St., Columbia, SC 29208 LOUISIANA STATE
Orders: 800-768-2500
UNIVERSITY PRESS
FAX: 800-868-0740
P.('). Box 251)53 * Baton Rouge, LA 70894-5053
Credit card orders: 800-)-861-3477
ARCHETICTURE
Ecstasies of Space, Time, & the Human Body
David Farrell Krell
Calls for rethinking architecture as a way of renegotiating our
encounter with the world, taking into account the role of love and
desire in all human making.
Illustrated: 14 b & w photographs, 15 line drawings
217 pp. * July 1997 * $17.95 pb * ISBN 0-7914-3410-9
AGONISTICS
Arenas of Creative Contest
Janet Lungstrum and Elizabeth Sauer, editors
Focuses on a very significant psycho-cultural concept (that of
"agonistics" or "contestatory creativity") with ramifications in
several areas of the postmodern debate: cultural philosophy,
psychologies of race, gender and the body, and narratology.
359 pp. * August 1997 * $20.95 pb ? ISBN 0-7914-3412-5
FROM HEGEL TO MADONNA
Towards a General Economy
of "Commodity Fetishism"
Robert Miklitsch
Moves from the discourses of dialectical negation to cultural-
populist affirmation-that is, from Hegel to Madonna Studies-in
order to envision a mode of critique that can persuasively describe
and explain the cultural contradictions of late capitalism.
224 pp. * November 1997 * $18.95 pb ? ISBN 0-7914-3540-7
K
The theme of the Getty Research Institute's residential
Scholar Program from September 1998 to June 2000
is "Representing the Passions." Applications for two-
year predoctoral and postdoctoral residential fellow-
ships are invited. Applications-welcome from any dis-
THE GETTY cipline in the arts, humanities, or social sciences-will
be evaluated in terms of how the proposed disserta-
RESEARCH INSTITUTE tion or book bears upon the theme. Research projects
FORTHE HISTORY which lead from "the passions" to issues about the
nature and history of "the humanities" will be of es-
OF ART AND
pecial interest. Applications must be postmarked no
THE HUMANITIES later than December 15, 1997.
his gift becomes our own."-The New York Times O REA 1)ING
Book Review.
THE MERRY iELART: Reflections on Reading, Writing, and the World of Books
ROBERTSON DAVIES. A collection of twenty-four essays and lectures on the
world of books and on readers, writers, and the miracle of language, comes
almost entirely from Davies's own files of unpublished material.
Viking 0-670-87366-7 $25.95
0 -37 HUDSONST.-EWYO
University of Chicago
Regina M. Schwartz
The
I:i:
:iB
:iIii
Curse
;'"
i::
iii
i:
C
iiii
iii~j~g~kP~:?:??
of Cain
I:I
~a I
ii~k~jl;i
Cloth $22.95
A Critical History
Edited by Steven Henry Madoff Beetkoven
"Should be read by anyone interested in William Kinderman
understanding the ways in which we have
"Kinderman's analyses are original
had to change our entire idea of what art is
-sometimes breathtakingly so-
and what artists can do.... A clearly argued
insightful, sympathetic, and entirely
critical history." -David A. Ross, Director,
convincing. It is impossible to read
Whitney Museum of American Art
this book without having gained
The Documents of Twentieth-Century Art,
renewed appreciation of Beethoven's
$50.00 cloth, $24.95 paper, illustrated
massive achievement."
- Te Beethoven Journal
$ 17.95 paper, illustrated
Beethoven and
..::.:... :i
Largesse
Jean Starobinski
Translated by Jane Marie Todd
"Minute, often esoteric, and sometimes astounding.
... This brilliant discourse has been brilliantly
translated ... so resourceful has [Starobinski]
been that we can never again, if we read right to
the end of this scrupulously organized inspection
of a fundamental human gesture, bestow or receive
anything without a shudder of consciousness, of
:17:
"Nix suspicion, of dread... . there is an ultimate comfort
in this ominous yet luminous text."-Richard
Howard, Artforum/Bookforum
*Paper $29.95 220 pages 30 color plates, 50 halftones
and in ourselves"
... .. . . . ., .. : ..i:!: !.:: : ... . . ... . ..... . . . ..
"An inspiring effort
........
Mapping an Empire
! t .' ,-,
The Geographical Construction of British India,
? ,1 ? . . . .., -
1765-1843 1 ....:. ..a
Matthew H. Edney ? .Z?...
"The intellectual mapping of the survey and cartogra-
phy of empire has become one of the most exciting 1:?.
areas of imperial history. This book superbly demon-
strates how complex and rewarding such studies
can be. The author wisely avoids the more simplistic 7....
monolithic approach and brilliantly develops the cultur-.. . . . "
together the worlds of literary theory and novels, films, television series-is losing its
computer technology to explore the dominant position in our culture? Is it
implications of giving readers instant, necessary to define a new aesthetics of
easy access to a virtual library of sourcescyborg textuality?
as well as unprecedented control of what
Espen Aarseth explores the aesthetics and
and how they read. Now, in this second
textual dynamics of digital literature and its
edition, Landow shifts the focus from
diverse genres, including hypertext fiction,
Intermedia to Microcosm, Storyspace,
computer games, computer-generated
and the World-Wide Web.
poetry and prose, and collaborative Internet
"[Landow] points out that the concept texts such as MUDs. He situates these
'hypertext' lets us test some concepts literary forms within the tradition of "ergodic"
associated with critical theory, and literature-a term borrowed from physics to
gracefully shows how the technology describe open, dynamic texts such as the I
is contributing to reconfigurations of Ching or Apollinaire's calligrams, with which
text, author, narrative, and (literary) the reader must perform specific actions to
education."-Post Modern Culture, generate a literary sequence.
reviewing the first edition
"This is clearly the best study of electronic
Parallax: Re-visions of Culture and Society texts I have yet read."-Stuart Moulthrop,
Stephen G. Nichols, Gerald Price, and University of Baltimore, author of Victory
Wendy Steiner, Series Editors Garden
JULIA REINHARD
cri
LUPTON * *
thinking
digm of Biblical typology
together entered into the
construction of "the
Renaissance" as a
canon and period.
$39.50 cloth
from Stanford University Press
800-872-7423 (
* Individual members of the International Association for Semiotic Studies will be entitled to this prefer-
ential subscription rate upon submission to Mouton de Gruyter of the special coupon attached to their
membership card. The individual rate is applicable only when prepaid and ordered directly from the
publisher. Prepayment may be made by check or by credit card: MasterCard [Access], EuroCard, Visa and
American Express. Orders placed for institutions will be invoiced at the institutional rate.
Institutional subscriptions and single or back issues can be ordered from your
local bookseller or subscription agent or directly from MOUTON DE GRUYTER
(a division of Walter de Gruyter) at the following addresses:
THE I NEWIi
TE
CflrA! CRITICAL
TRADITION
Classic Texts and
Contemporary Trends
Second Edition
David H. Richter,
Queens College of tbe City University
of New York
BEFR oC
Fo xaiaio oievsi *,,%%,.m dfn -ln oscoio cl -8046-93
INTIMACY
Guest editor, Lauren Berlant
1 00931896(199723)24:111111 1
0093-1896(199723)24:1;1 -I