The heat loss is approximated by the followin, Qom 0° = 1.66107 x} <2 2 Qua sci } +8.83x107 x %(Qew — Qeovr) Qn = Qin ASME PTC 44-2008 ‘Step 7: The sulfur dioxide molar flow is the sum of the sulfur dioxide molar flow from the GT gas and the change in molar flow of sulfur dioxide from the combustion of the fuel. ‘Step $: The duct burner gas mas flow is the sum of the GT gas flow, the duet burner fuel flow, the augmenting airflow, and the atomizing steam flow. ‘Step % Calculate the duct burner constituent mass fractions. The duct burner gas constituent mass fraction is the constituent molar flow times the constituent molecular weight divided by the total duct burner gas mass flow. 5.3.3 HRSG Heat Loss ‘The heat loss is estimated from the HRSG as a function of the GT gas flow. The test uncertainty analysis typically does not warrant detailed calculations. The heat loss would be for typical systems. Unusual ccases may require additional calculations. More guidance is available in Nonmandatory Appendix F. ‘The heat loss is approximated by the following equation: Ow. -tasao (22) vasactors( M2) aeouane{ Set) suas xa = us, 100% (Qe ~Qecez) ‘The above equation is based on a base loaded, unfired operating condi supplemental firing will have a minor impact on the caleutated heat loss in Btu/hr and this equation should bbe used based upon the heat input from the GT only. The range of heat input that this equation is valid for is from 100 million Buw/hr to 1,500 million Buw/hr. For heat inputs outside this range the user is referred to Nonmandatory Appendix F. 5-4 GAS FLOW BY GAS TURBINE ENERGY BALANCE 5.4.1 Gas Turbine Gas Flow Calculations