Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Caroline Kissam
NUR 3241
“I pledge…”
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT !2
The recent development of the COVID 19 pandemic has brought about the need for quick
implementation of telehealth, which our institution has not utilized in the clinic setting. This
emergency implementation has lead to a lot of frustration for the patients and the physicians.
Physicians find that patients have no understanding of how to do a telehealth visit so they spend
most of the allotted visit time helping the patient problem solve the technology instead of
assessing their health concerns. The patients feel frustrated because they cannot figure out how
to use the technology and feel like they haven’t received a thorough exam because they are used
Contributing Factors
Most of our patients in the clinic are elderly and a large percentage of those patients do
not have the technology required to do a telehealth visit. Of those that do have the
technology many do not have a good understanding of the applications used for a telehealth
visits. This knowledge deficit leads to great frustration for patients and physicians. Another
issue that complicates telehealth visits in our clinic is that the schedulers do not anticipate the
problems patients may have and try to mitigate them before they occur. Therefore, many of the
telehealth visits result in frustration for the physician due to decreased ability to assess the
patient’s problems because they cannot see them and because visits take longer than the allotted
time to complete. As mentioned above, the patients also feel frustration over the visit because
they don’t understand how to use the technology and they don’t feel like they get the personal
Plan and Do
The keys to a successful telehealth visit is twofold. 1) The schedulers need to assess the
patient’s ability to do a telehealth visit as well as their understanding of the technology and the
process. 2) The schedulers need to be able to educate the patient on how to use the applications
Initially when we began implementing telehealth we didn’t really consider the challenges
people would have doing these types of visits. The schedulers were given a physician schedule
and were told to call the patients and change them from an in office visit to a telemedicine visit.
The first day of telehealth visits did not go well. Physicians spent most of their time trying to
help themselves and their patients problem solve the technology. Most of the visits ended up
being a simple phone call because the patients could not figure out the technology.
Because telehealth was being implemented so quickly all over the state there was really
no example to pull from. The only specialty in our hospital system that utilized telehealth was
neurology for emergency assessment of stroke patients and this was initiated by the ER staff and
not by the patients themselves. In other words there was not example available for us to follow.
We were just blazing our own trail in an attempt to still provide safe patient care in the midst of
At the end of day one of the telehealth implementation we acknowledged that the
outcome was not very desirable so we discussed what we could do to improve the process. The
discussion involved our lead physician, our management team and our lead scheduler. Our
observations were that the schedulers didn’t anticipate the potential problems. We agreed that
the schedulers needed to be given instructions regarding what to say and even educated on the
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT !4
problems encountered on day one of telehealth visits. Our discussion lead to the idea that we
needed a checklist for the schedulers to follow when making the telehealth visits. The check list
was a series of questions: 1) Are you willing to do a telehealth visit instead of an in person
visit? 2) Do you have a smart phone or tablet with video capability? 3) Have you activated your
MyChart account (MyChart being the application we use for telehealth visits)? 3) Have you
installed the MyChart app on your phone and/or tablet? If the patient was not able to
use MyChart for some reason the alternative was a Doxy.Me visit which required a smart phone
with a camera. The patients would receive a text from the physician with a link that allowed the
patients to connect with the physician simply by clicking on the link, typing in their name and
hitting the submit button. Doxy.Me was the least desirable method from the practice billing side
but it was an alternative that was better than a simple phone call which was utilized only as a last
resort. After going through the list of questions and determine that the patient indeed had the
ability to do a telehealth visit the scheduler was given instructions to give to the patient on how
At the end of day two, which was day one of the patients that had been scheduled
utilizing the check list the physician reported much better success with the telehealth visits.
They reported that 50% of their visits went much better but, they still had visits that ended in a
phone call because the patient couldn’t figure out the technology. The team met again
and decided that we would make a second call to the patient to remind them of the visit date/time
and also confirm that they were able to use the MyChart app. Again we utilized a checklist with
the following questions: 1) Your appointment time is on this day at this time. Have you
downloaded the MyChart application and logged in to your account? 2) Did you see the
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT !5
telehealth visit on your visit schedule? 3) Did you click on the visit and run the test for
compatibility and was it successful? If the patient answered yes to all the questions we would
put a notation in the visit that MyChart app was confirmed so the physician could be assured that
we assessed their ability to do the visit and that to the best of our knowledge the patient knew
how to do the visit. If we could not confirm the use of MyChart we would instruct the patient on
Doxy.Me and indicate on the schedule that Doxy should be used to contact the patient. If it was
determined that neither video application could be used we would indicate that the patient
couldn’t use the video application and that the patient should be contacted by phone only.
At the end of day three when we used the confirmation phone call the physicians reported
that the success rate increased by approximately 25% and that the patients expressed their
appreciation of the staff going the extra mile to ensure that they knew how to do the telehealth
visit. Both the schedulers and physician reported this type of patient feedback and elaborated
that the patients expressed the understanding of the need to utilize telehealth during the pandemic
and that they appreciated the extra help preparing for the visit. Still at the end of day three there
were still patient visits that ended being done by a phone call only as the technology failed for
unanticipated reasons such as poor cell phone reception or a technical problem with the
Unfortunately due to the circumstances our timeline for implementation of the proposal
was very quick. We were given a days notice to begin changing visits to telehealth. This order
was issued on a Friday and we were instructed to do the best we could to have all visits changed
to telehealth within one week. We started that day with the appointments on the following
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT !6
Monday and worked our way through the week. Some routine follow up visits were moved out
to a later date but visits that needed to occur on the date they were originally scheduled were
changed to telehealth. We moved quickly and were able to get to some of Tuesdays visits by the
day’s end. On Monday we started working on the rest of Tuesday’s schedule and with mass
participation from staff the we pulled from other areas we were able to get through the rest of the
week by Wednesday. This was a huge effort. We are a large cardiology group and on any given
Change was tested mainly by physician feedback and patient feedback that is
communicated to the physician. Because we are on such short timeline of 1 week and we
had limited staff we did not survey patients. At the end of each day we had a round table
discussion with physicians, managers and schedulers to discuss the outcome and what changes
needed to be made. Physicians provided feedback on the number of visits they were able to
complete by telehealth successfully. Improvement was measured the positive feed back from the
physicians that visits went smoothly and by the increase in the number of telehealth visits
completed successfully in the amount of time allotted. Changes were made to create
We knew that change was an improvement based on the positive feedback from patients
and physicians that were able to use the telehealth method without difficulty, that the visit was
completed in the allotted visit time, and an increase in the number of successful telehealth visits
done in a day.
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT !7
References
Davis, S. M., Jones, A., Jaynes, M. E., Woodrum, K. N., Canaday, M., Allen, L., & Mallow, J. A.
model for developing complex interventions in nursing. BMC Nursing, 19(9), 1-9. http://
dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-0400-9
designing-patient-centered-telehealth
Sundstrom, B., DeMaria, A. L., Ferrara, M., Smith, E., & McInnis, S. (2020). "People are
10.1080/03630242.2019.1643814
resources/pdca-cycle
QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT !8
Appendix:
Fishbone diagram
Timeline: