Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The images are used as a resource that serves as a parallel to the texts. The reactions
we have "looking at an image" are similar to those of reading texts.
There are images that are not identified or are not understood
There are images that do not like
The reactions of the spectators are very different (fear, confidence, ...)
complementary, contradictory?
The sharing of the companions helps us to perceive details that had been seen.
Abstract image divided into two planes. The one on the right shows the crucifixion
and the one on the left the resurrection.
Theologically the painter clearly represents that the two moments are closely
connected. They cannot be separated from each other.
Life illuminates even the crucifixion part. It is the pinnacle of revelation.
One student looked only at the crucifixion - be careful because when we read
we can only look at one part.
A student showed how the same elements are in the two parts of the image: dry
branch, living branch.
Another student noticed the disciples, are they Juan and María? Are they from
Emmaus?
This is an image that has been difficult to identify. The reason is the ignorance of
Daniel's story.
Another student was moved by the peace of the prophet, by the light that illuminates
his face.
We tend to discard little-known texts or those that pose difficulties for us.
The passage from Daniel and the painting want to convey how trust in God gives
peace in the face of difficulties. Whoever trusts in him “tames the beasts”.
The story of Daniel is taken up by the first Christians as an anticipation (type) of the
characteristics of Christ.
The image was difficult to identify. You have to look at the characters, what they are
carrying, the conversation…. and to listen to colleagues.
The prophet's staff, the water bowl and the basin are the keys to the story.
Importance of dialogue between biblical characters.
The first reaction to this image has been one of rejection. Its aesthetics and the break
with the previous ones dislodge us.
There are biblical stories and characters that we have internalized in a concrete
way. When another interpretation or vision is given, they dislodge, but open new
avenues.
Importance of the Tradition that preserves visions that are not the majority today.
The embrace between two men makes it possible to identify the scene.
It is normal that over time elements that are not from the original text are introduced
(such as the wife of the eldest son)
The Bible transmits human universals that remain valid throughout all time.
It was not possible to identify her, because we do not internalize the image of Mary in
that way.
Each time has a very specific way of transmitting elements that are in the texts or
tradition. In this case, Mary as a model of wisdom, as a queen, as an important
woman….
This photocomposition articulates the old (Michelangelo's Pietà) and the new (the
photograph of a war). In it there are identifiable elements (Pieta) but updated: Mary is
replaced by a man, but the pain for the death of the son is the same.
Group
Read frequently and learn the best you can. May the dream surprise you while you
hold the codex in your hands and may the sacred page receive your face defeated by
sleep "
St Geronimo,
Ep 22.17