You are on page 1of 4
PewttHon for Wait tn the Nalute of Phohiertion “Proht pron’ 15 @ Judicias OAdes Jo the agencies CoonsHis Honal, S4alutoay oh non- Statutory ) From Continuing their Proceectings in C404 Oh abuse of thes surisciction oh in vioration of the Princes ©f natural Juste OA tA Contrayenhon of the Lara 6} the land. Prohibition has much in Common cotth CArlorars ; howevts, Phohibition Gs issued white ad ministpative Process 16 in motion to Prevent + krom Proceeding further, Crrtionads és issued to Zuash the Proceeclings and 16 thasekohe issued when the administnative Process has ended ina dtzision. InN THE HTH Court of DELHI AT DELUT (consttu tional wait Duris diction) Civil WAY Petition Alo.....0f..... 49 Re: ABE Yio. | Vosus tree Petitiones EDA povernment 2. Labo uA Count -.. ResPondents WRIT PETITION Im THE MATTER OF ARISE 226 of THE CONSII Tu TION Of INDIA FoR WRIT OF PROHTOTITON OR OTHER AppRoPRIATE weit To The Hon'bie Chick Justice and the Pulane Sudge of the aforesaid Hon'bie Coust The humbie Petition of the above- Named Petitiones most AaPectpuy SHEWETH : $. 1-That the PetiHones & the Secretary of the Homeopathic Research tasssute, which f6 a Aegistred body unde the Inclian societies ACH, ancl Which i5 engeged in Carrying on and Promoting hesearch in HlomeoPathy. 2. That on 1899 ee auady, 1498, an ordet, Panporting 40 have heen Passed by the Hhevranment of Delhi, Respondent No.l, under Setlion 10 of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1547, was Served uPon the Petikoou, Communit casing to hinr th a clibpube between the Homeopothic Reseatch Fnstidute and 115 EMPLoyees has been he} ted to the Labeut Cou}, Dethi. A thue copy of the Said ohdes is annexed hereto and marked annexure ‘A’, 3 “That the HomeePathic Research Trstitute Ping Fotery Engoged in heseaseh and advancement of Knewiedge 1g nol carrying on any economic activity 11 @ businegs- Uke manne and, +16 net an industry as defined unda the Tnduspriat Disputes Act, igy7,4echon WV.- 4 Thad the above ohdts of the troveromens of Dai is waltaa vires the Industrial Disputes ACt1947 5. That the labour Coutl hat no Jurisdiction over the bard Avg Pute- 6. That the Petitiones wih be Ir eatiy ik he 66 Reguired 40 6ubmit himself hefrenee. '0 Convenienced to the above 4. That the Hon'pie cous has Jurisdithon to try Gnd Aispose of the Mettes und Anl.196 of the Constitution of Fndtia. @- That no ofhu Pettion “B Pending in dhe Hon'pt High Court or $04 the Bame hetie¢ & Court ok In any ofhes in the BuPreme Court 4 Docha. 9. That no othes ablAnative oh eft . : Feactoug hemedy & availapie to the Pes? tiones. oe _ ee pa a PRAYER 1b ig theregohe, mont herpect {uly Preyed that thié Hon'bie Courl may g7aciously be Pieased to. (a) T4646 @WAit, ohded oh Atheetion in the nature & Phohibitton Ain eeting the labour Court, ResPondent No.2 not to excserse Jurtsdiction ever the hopute in PuAsuante Ob the hd, annexure ‘A’ (bv) Altow the c0sis Of this PetHon. c (© Poss Buch burthes on other onder (A) ab this Court may deem fit and PAopar foh the ends OF JBuserce. Adl/- counsel toh the Pet tones Plager 2d, Dole: 22 ee Note :- An A$kelavit & to be Given by the PeHHonn.

You might also like