irst Americans
New WoriD
NINA G. JABLONSKI
‘Symposium Series in Anthe
if THE CALIFORNIA ACADEMY
Number 27
San Francisco,
Apeil 8, 21
STOCENE COLONIZATION
ogy
3 SCIENCES.RNER
Russian). 223 pp
Mignatoes in New
lesin No. 27. Tucson,
Tempe, AZ
Palas of Berigia
ed. Am, Andhopol
9, Eth
CHAPTER SEVEN
THE MIGRATIONS AND ADAPTATIONS
OF THE FIRST AMERICANS
CLovis AND PRE-CLovis VIEWED
FROM SOUTH AMERICA
AC. Roosevelt, j
in Douglas and Linda Brown
carly as 15,000 of even 20,000 years ago by opportunistic foragers who
carefully aked projec poi
one side,
s. Collecting a wide range
people from northeast
sites discussed inthis chaper is present
|ROC
IGLAS
AND BROWN
much wider ran
the preferred Clovis
been
1nd in diverse regions
seacoast, topical lowlands,
spectrum foraging of diverse
rmegafzuna (se Dillehay &
1g was not the “bread-and.
spheric Clovis
fluted points? has evaporated in the face of regional sequences that have now been
established inROOSEVELT, DOUGLAS AND BROWN
‘ent dats on eatly
stead offers a
egre cltures in southwesteza Ne
n South America, respectively, because thei si sod
significance of che new data. The new picture of Paleoindian cultures based on
spheric data aot oal derstanding of the initial human coloniza
the Americas but leo has
about human evolution and human nature
sce asthe possible general significance ofthis picture in early New World culture histo
sy and beyond 1 for furate research,
tive radia
Early Paleoindians in North America
‘The Clovis migration theory
1964; Jennings 1983;
who hunted lars
ater the
upland grasslands of the c
fon large mammals such as mammoth, long-hor. bis
American animals were unaccustomed to human hunting, the highly el
spearchunting methods were th
92; Haynes 1964; Lynch 1983; Martin 1967; Mos
162
DUTH AMERICA
experi
descendants
in diagnostic
jocumented Pleistocene radiocarbon mex
mn processes was aot yet wel developed, and the
recognized as tx
remains and lacke
surements, Knowle
the specific regions
scologist’ growing experience and changes in
an improved body
163WIS VIEWED FROM SOUTH AMERICA
ROOSEVELT, DOUGLAS AND BROWN,
Chons: Younger than we thought
In the n
vas assumed
ly precise dates with standard-rror bars no greater than abou
years, The dates are run oa single, taxonomically identified
ogialyientiied
graphy in primary as
Paleoindian literature cites the span from
hed age of Clovis (Fi
reviewed pub
identified botanical
specialises (Aitken 1990:77; Bowman 198
dates from the same site context were unreliable and
1 BP (sce Figure
sites were redated with the improved technique of gs co
ng as 7,000
CClares wold
isa problematie o
pect review
presentations or personal communications.
ned. There has be
arbon dating Some are rare, statistical out- |
lange setis of consistently later dates on associated samples
from the same context (a5 at Lehner, Mur
tres are set ase, a very diferent picare ofthe Pale
large amounts of
0-148, 232-233; MiROOSEVELT, DOUGLAS AND BROWN
LOVIS AND PRE-CLOVIS VIEWED FROM SOUTH AM
eB. (se Appendix 1). Many writers
ly the earest possible beginning age for
acceptable eror bars. Fut
cultural associations
able Clovis date seves averages 00 ear
\848 + 20yr BP), Mo
only the uae those run on unidentified carbon, carbon
red contests, or samy ur documented cultural oF stratigraphic
ube dates, whi mary association
500 age of another
in Texas (Fersing 1989, 199,
‘widely claimed as proof for an initial Clovis age of
‘They
were run on aggregates of stratigraphic
taination from the peat
stratum composed of materials eroded
erring 1989, 1994: 25, Figures 38
al-bearing Cretaceous bedrock of the
9), Such a context would
(oreove, the dates were aot on individ
Clovis-ag, termi
of specific exava
ble carbon isotope
unclear
these dates do not have published
exact age range of rad
12, no specifically Clove style lithies have been
eek ae eee ne artifacts have been illustrat
Clovis, Blckvater Draw, NewCLOVIS AND PRE-CLOVIS VIEWED FROM SOt
ROOSEVELT, DOUGLAS AND E
WN
There is, then, no empirical support at al for an age of 12,000
the Clovis culture. By standa age ofthe
lished 1 large series of dates from the five documented Clovis s
range from at. 11,200 o 10,800 yr BP, with an average age
Aserbe farther on.
Where did the Paleandians come from and bow did thy come?
‘The current archacological and biological evidenc
Of the Clovis migratir
are no instances of Late Pkistoce
are catly Holocene
have broad spectrum foraging culrares with stemme
(Aikens & Higuehi 1982; Aikens & Akazawa we of which (Figure 4b) were
shaped by techniques indian bifsces. The refined
sing long, regular, diagonal, parallel sof
3 Forms (large curved blades), sometimes claimed as
wopean Bate Plistocene
hammer thinning) and ce
indian origins
also have changed over the decades. Metric snd aoametre cranial characters have beenROOSEVELT, DOUGLAS AND BROWN
te much media
therefore be
(Begley & Mure 1999;
the cranial tats at issue aze
percentage similarity with the cast Asian pattern termed
Sinodonty, but a low pescentage similar
phology means that a certain
Asian population (Neves «al
by dena morph
There is some new evidence
Jhomans as entering and
they were supposed to have lacked
wera researchers have argued against these assumptions, pointing out the
tal resources and the lack of archaeological evidence aloag the sup
jon route (Bryan 19784; Pladmark 1978; Gruha 1994). Ofer the
ed coastwise (Edlandson, ths volume). Some researchers now suggest
ice-feee corridor was not open at the app
igrants (Roberts & Julig nd), and others suggest thatthe
CLOVIS AND PRE-
LOVIS VIEWED FROM SOUTH AN
in press; Pow
southern California coast, an ancient garbage midden
sh, shellfish, and marine bids has p
+0 9,500 yr BP. (Eeandsen & Moss 1996; Erlandsen eal
196; Eelandson,
me are early Paloindian in age,
probably ie now under ~ 60 meters after post
route, for
and has appeared in ms (Bednask 1989; Bry
ichay 2000; Dixon 1999; Kreger x & Phillips 1958).
hat people came into the Americas before anatomically modern humans and
jppet Paleolithic cultures had appeazed in Europe; they the have lacked the
points for specialized
crude stone flakes, and edge
to make fine and
Instead, they were supposed
trimmed cobble tools, and tools of perishable materials
research, however, neither the pred
borne out. No valid American cultures pre
ls All verified early Paes
Ate many years logy 20: history
dustries. One important clement
ne outby recent research: thatAND PRE-CLOVIS VIEWED FROM SOUTH AMERI
ISEVELT, DOUGLAS AND BROWN
samples
carbon (Figure
the late Pleoinian
ad), Anow-discredited
‘on carbon
Reanier
& Cing Mars 1982) remais
a age (Ta cazcous rocks,
1 the southers (Ackerman 1996511512).
ple, but check At others
has been
site, has repeatedly been chimed a5 2. 1
jn Bluefish eaves, northern Alaska (Motlan
‘carbon contamination from
‘occupa
carbon dates range widely over a span of 11,000 years
Radiocarbon dates
67) Is age could readily re by AMS dating of indivi
lnts and the puted amino acids of several
two pre-Clovis Mesa dates areAS AND BROWN,
1S AND PRE-CLOVIS VIEWED F
(Kan & Reaie 194,05
8 711600" 80nearthcharcoat Bota 55286 Spit sa
tole aszocated
8 41,100 7onearth charcoal; Beta-67420 Spit sample
tools associated wes00
a 10,000 aS hearth charcoat Seta-50428
Saddle 10,070 60 hearth charcoal, Beta-09898 Not n Science
® 10,060 Tones charcost: Beta 52608
tools associated
fakes associated
8 10,000 sO hearth charcoal; Reta 5285
‘ols asclted
Saddle 9990 Ohearth charcoal, Beta-S5202
Saddle 9,945 7Shaarth charcoal Beta-50420 |
8 9.990 eo hearth charcoal; Beta-55284
tools associated
8 19900 BO hearth charcoal; Betn-69899 Notin Science
Saddle 9,790 Oso charcoat; Bt. 26805CLOVIS AND PRE-CLOVIS VIEWED FROM SOUTH AMERICA
a COS. Ba
88 69 0@ ea
A &\f) 48ROOSEVELT, DOUGLAS AND BROWN
or atachment (Anders
South American
hafting feature, there is no formal.
ver show this form. In this impoctant
al overlap between the two area and there
wians
Incomplete knowledge of the cultural and ecological characteristics of Pale
ossble ancestor in the erly days of reseazch thus has tended to
character and historical significance of South and Central American culrres inthe pe
pling
cate the
Americas
Central America and Northwestern South America
the nature of cultural remains, th
‘The arifcts supposed to
& Beyan 1977). Thee are 00.
lured points, contemporary megafauna, or human skeletons. Some
15 atthe claimed early sites are teling, Northern Mexican sites
amount to finds of indetermis
>» Tepexpan
Paleondian, produced an age of less than 2000 years wi
‘able 255). At Los Tapales, Guatemala, afew
food remains were associated with three disparate Late Pleistocene an
points nor
poke 1991; Ardila
CLovIs AND
{E-CLOVIS VIEWED FROM SOUTH AMERICA
thout Clovs-spe lk
49). The fake scars supposed
flakes ltr invaded by pressure
ided points could align with viewally any Paleoindian or Eacy
1 waisted shapes have no relation to Clovis forms
forms tha ae late Paleoindian oF
ses 2.28, 2.33, 2.37; Anderson e a1
the realty of a
tre 1.2). Only the song fa
s have turned up in areas
indian ocewpation but have not been dated (Ranere
ed ps
angular
ms of large
13). Beuadorian lice
ace claimed to be Clovis
earliest of thie
to represent pre-Clovis,
sider the evidence equiv
etal)SEVELT, DOUGLAS AND BROWN
tural sequence from bi
in Venezuela (Basse
point pes have bee
1979). However, the site does aot meet
both ends (Ardila
Jobo bipoint. The bi
1 evidence for a very
4 lowland Paleoindian occups
TAMERICA
tes in eropical forest have pro
000 ye BP
Lopes de
sites were abundant carbonized plants represe
The Central Andes
highland plans
negafauna kill sts, and no pre-pro
te of the C
point forage sites have bes
iocarbo
the north coast of Peru (Richardson 197
sum seepage. Its crude lithics
the ony two radiocarbon dates, which are non-ovelapping
marine shell, « material considered unreliable for dat
1987:49-52.
Pers appears
angela,
with undoubted ar
and 7.10
183IS AND PRE
AS AND BROWN
1s VIEWE
AMERICA, |
= “cy e. oe {ab ne Component
12.0 to 30 027 125 w }
157, ayer «| 10.200 = 140 °
128 Level fe 11008 = 220 @
wl 4 5 = 260 °
ee 18M 10,390 = 220 1987 @
‘9850 = 170, 1986 °
1047s = 125 1936 ”
10170 = 300 1940 °
538 7
337 ”
10770= 130 1702 7
Sacto NI Me
W126 rasor= 1s TeSI6-T2195 2005, w
8 Radic
sed with pes
cot, Peru (Sarde 19
fom uch
2s betwee
‘broad-spectrum
the few megs
game hunting jr than the asso
alcoindian cultures are contem
5 big- game bunting
sccute evidence for
1s 185AS AND BROWN 1S AND PRE
WIS VIEWED FROM
the
hat they ae
ote that
186:T, DOUGLAS AND BROWN
ith the cultural charcoal and att
indication that megafauna were probably used a f
ten cultural dates from seven eatly fsa pint sts in the So
al. 1983; Polits 1991), which is comparable to the time
span of the Clovis-Folsom Paleoindin sequence in North America. In the vicinity of
Los Toldos on the Patagonian plateau, archaeologists have uncovered « poory-known
preceramic culture characterized by raze tangular projectile poincs as well as fi
bone, aot as prey. The
ne ran between
verified and dated; a single date of 12600 + 600 yr BP
ardich 1978 296; Cardich «al 1973) lacks secure
a al
is remakal
the valid Paleoindin cultures established in western South
America give no evidence forthe bypod
from Clovis What they do show is the existence of a divese
passage of big game huaters descended
ly thatthe western South
emporary Clovis which has dif
subsistence orientation, than to che broad-spectrum hunting
lore, which predates them.
peal eastern South America, as in the Andean zone, Mute
ig cultures have not been verified. As in the other areas of the
CLOVIS AND PRE-CLOVIS VIEWED FROM SOUTH AMERICA,
Southeastern Bragil and Uruguay
Numerous pre-Clovs sites have been claimed for erstern Brasil but none meet the
standaeds for reliable, Uranium-Thorium dates > 100,000 ye BP. at Toca da Esperanca
‘were run on megafaunal bones found with crudely Naked rocks in Cental, but the radio
cathon dates oa charcoal with the bones were exclusively middle Holocene (
1993; de Lumley af 1987), The Middle Pistocene dates, thus, relate to geological
taining reworked faunal bones, not to the human materials, which appear tobe
Alice Boer, there were pre
Pato
ral processes (Lynch
A fragment of painted eave wall
1 sof, indistinct sand
prehistoric human habitation, such as fragments of burned
ones and carbonized food plants were absent from the a
the existence of as
disturbed strata covering tock art panels
the Lagoa Santa region of Minas Gerais
jn Mato Grosso just south of the
1987), have
and molluscs, These biological remains show
siderably moister than the curent savanna woodlands and
dey forests, whose vegetation has been depleted by centuries of timbering, ranching, and
plantation agriculture since the European conquest. The few remains of megafauna at
some sites ae pieces reworked from limestone geological substrata. No use of megafa-
fas human prey as been verified,
Pleistocene habitats wereROOSEYE AS AND BROWN
faces, narsow noses, long, narrow heads, and
J up on che surface
), The Amazonian
1999, 20006; Ri
dates ftom
me researchers had also assumed th
refuges under Late Gk
nas (Absy 1979; van der H
de 8
1994; Hal
moderate a
Isotopes from -20 t0-37 per
Bis
le 1995; Tieszen 1991; van der Merwe & M
twiangular points were found proba
1991). Thus, the
already had topical
Monte Algre
Among the surfice-find-places
Amazon was the Monte Alegre, Par
points inthe Lower
River opposite
Santarem
191ROOSEVELT, DOUGLAS AND BROWN CLOVIS AND PRE-CLOVIS VIEWED FROM SOUTRICAROOSEVE OWN
mae:
* preceramie occupation
the lever Initial B rs
the weighted average is 10,420 + 23 and the mean calibrated value ca. 12522 ye BP. The
rt
lgists have oj
‘a. 11200 ye BP, the eatiest age
sequence
ovis
Bot ot we sn
the average for
201
0 ye BP, respectively, In addition,
te dates
ada, An ancient envi-
‘Alege culture was con-ROOSE
DOUGLAS AND BROWN
numerous identified taxa (Figure
small and large
nds doe
diverse frit
sized rodents, a
small game. Only thee fexgmentary bones among the several hundred preceramic spec
ens recovered could larger fauna of az 65 kg weight. The 56 stable
carbon isotopes of the carbonized plant remains averaged «a. —29 per mil and ranged
fom -24 to -37 per mil (normalized to wood) (Appendix 1), values typical of cos
canopy topical rainforests, not of savannas or even of open forests. Thus, these exty
Amazonian Clovis contemporaries were tropical minforest foragers, not specialized
savanna big-game hunters.
Conclusions
eat that the Clovis migration
1th American high plains were wel
proponents of Clovis as
Central and western South America, However, the accrued evidence does not replace
(Clovis with 2 much-eatir ancestor, fr all the ciimed pre-Clovis cultures other
wehemisphere soon afte
years ago. The initial complexes that have come to light scem oe the fist estab
lished regional adaptations, not the cach region, s0 we
found the remains
areas of the Americas thus remain relatively unknown archaeological
periods, so research is needed to tice in deal the movements ofthe fist peoples. Wete
‘here several source areas and source populations in
there afer establishing themse!
tool culeures
d ecological
routes through the hemisphere o
We especial
A cultures of 2 Alas, the Ch
from more precise
rica which m
202
1 AND PRE: CLOVIS VIEWED FROM SOUTH AMERICA
1 easten equatorial lowly
of smal game,
ricas has
‘The
aging Theory,
primeval adaptation (Beaton
we research on the Plio
ngs
io. Big-game hunting was the o
‘was supposed to have be
he relationshipROOSEV
LT, DOUGLAS AND BROWN,
DVIS AND PRE.CLOVIS VIEWED FROM
UTH AMERICA,
Abstract
Chis ig game buns of the worth bg Be ucaeoenee
Antiepalaits bebo thet Clos plexes (g, Frison & Stanford
colonized the lemispbr fom Alaska to Patagonian oa thousand year fram
12.000 111,000 years aga Tlvgh 0 be flened te big br game trgh ter reng lds
the North Amicon bh pains ad th ol, arid plan of Conrad Sontb America — thy
ston bth ide ofthe cominet anda te game our, iaseidn topical ra
aston Central Americ and Seth Ameri
ed Clovis assemblages
ich usages are problematic at mul
He levels A
Syetmatc notions at bth old ad mew Palesindan itr have chansd the pcre of the
ions and aaptarions ofthe fst American. Altbgh same ravacbr bad dreamed of more
reli eare fram 12,00 t 30,000 yar ag, the vide for them ba filed meso
tia of rine comet date sis lacking omtainton fom psec! carbo, documented ou
tara remains and comparable fins at several sites. Resunatio of evidence as has pated Clas
ounger than bad ee thot, no earker than cont 11,100 to 10,800 yr BLP. Alaska sil ba be
cares ly dated ad netted culture na rons fom 1180010 11,0009 BP, at thee ou spear hunters and thee presumed descendants, using
tre are broa-pcram bunter lr not resem Cle reali oltre or cecal ade eee
tation. Escavtions at mew sites and cntined work at od anes bare changed the pcr in South
America as vel, reeling a lack of a Chis borion. Eten supped Clo
jan and Eady Archaic cultures
is horizon without a secure chrono
the peoples
‘28 10,000 years ago. Some
term Archaic for broad-spec
‘riangula points. However, since these two terms were
34 presumed chronological sequence
‘ured out 1 be contemporary
rail anor orgs as ld as
i ew ede on the colonization reel he
tion of are divers To- Age clog and cura adepations tha resins suet rig ew area ais Nene
‘estos fr rece ris. . cd radiocarbon ages a
abl Clovis beginning
Endnotes contexts is about 13,000 calendar years, a
O0 oF less (Gee Appendix
in uncalbrates
es in northeastern sits is com
the following manner. ACI is defined, du ro che presen
Difaces co undiagnostic that actu
fc find occuring |
points even when ther ate no basl channel lakes, but only broad ehinning
-dge-trimming (+g, Fison 1991:70, gure 234; Morrow
Ewan 1997340, gute 23)."The narute of the ithics in val
sed inthe leraare by the characterization of veryROOSEVE AS AND BROWN,
} Donahue, K. Cushman, RC C
feadowcroft Rod
3 bie change, bre
sm. Pages 216-228 in LG. Strauss, BV. Eriksen
te lo Ag: The Arhaeegy
A, NY.
Scien Based Dating in Arco.
HL. 1987, Pate Fated Poi
on 17), Simon Fraser U
Anderson, D. G, I. D.
ical considera
Pabedan o
ed, Haman a the En
Plenum, New ¥
(Depar
Environmental and chrono-
problema Balin Mate del
Western Amazon: Climate,
humans. Ani 73:287-300,
Science
Preceramic occupations in the
Be ing continents: $.
206
CLOVIS AND PRE.CLOVIS VIEWED FROM
SOUTH AMERICA
sing: Verte Tapbonomy and
L338 pp
the Ste of El Inga, Eanador University of
(Cave medio, Paper presented at
gress Serra do Cap
R. Enriquez, J. Danon, , & G. Poupeau. 1986
ing of burat chers feom the Alice Boer site, Brazil. Pages
ec, New Esidee forthe Plime Poplin of the Ameria
arly Man, Orono, ME.
ocene adaptations. Pages 313-341 fe 8 R. Binford & L.
R.Binford, eds, New Pepa in Arbeoly, Aldine, Chicago, IL.
1988, Tram and Archaoey in Soh Ci
i TA. 246 pp.
AT, &}L Co 9. Clos Revd: New Pepetier ow Palesindon
Adepitions from Blackauter Drax, New Mest, University Museum, University of
PA 145 pp,
~R. 1995. A reassessment of the Plio-Pleistocene pollen records of East
TC Partdge, LH. Burke, eds,
laman Origins. Yale Universiy Press, New
Zatets
sity of
arguments for Pleistocene artifacts from the Old Crow
on: A preliminary statement. Pages
Gide 5494
Early mi
September 6:A13,
Borrero, I. A. 1996. The Pleistocene Holocene transi
ages 339-354 i LG, Straus, BV. Esicksen, . M
New York, NY.
Humans atthe End of the Ice Age lem
A, & C, McEwan. 1997. The peoDOUGLAS AND BROWN,
Press, Betkele, and British
ye and worked-bone artifacts from the
se, Te Mil Iran Site University of New
the study of the Paeoindian
d. Pages 63-76 in E, Wagner & A. Zucchi, eds, Unidad y
mire, eds, Clic Orig and Adaptations. Centr forthe Study
Americans, Oxegoa State University, Corvallis, OR
Bryan, A. 8. Barty Man in Amora from a Circ Pa Pepi. (Occasional
‘Anthropology, Universiy of Alber ological
5 TaimaTaima, Pages 53-58 in
Time Taima: A Late Pliswcme Pale-Indian Kil Si
CS/ South American Quaternary Do
C.Ochsenius & R Grub,
Northeast South Ameria
Progam.
A. L,, M. Casamiquela,} M. Crux
‘mastodon kill t Taima-Taima, Vene
8, Recent excavations at Lauricocha (Central
Bryan, ed Earh Man in Anorica from & Cian
|. Department of And
J, 1973, Secuencia arqueologica y cronologia radio
o dela cueva 3 de Los Toldos. Relacone del Sciedad Argentina de Antropaegia
785-123,
‘Chatters J.C. 1998. Personal communicas:
ter, J.C, WEA. Neves, & M. Blum, 1999
is, Cur. Res Piste 1687-4
. 1988, Early hunter gatherers on the Pers
Keatnge, ed, Prmsian Preiory. Cambridge University Pres, Ca
A.C. Roosevel
The Kennewick Man: A
208
CLOVIS AND PRE-CLOVIS VIEWED FROM SOUTH AMERICA
1992 Prebisie de ke Cate Nord Pern: Le Paijonon de Capinigue. Centre
National de la Reeheche Scien
Clark, D. W. 1991. The sorthwes
yanichsen & K. L. Turn
‘of the First Americans, Department of Anthropology, Oregon State
University, oR.
Colinvaus, P'A., PE, de Olivia, PE. Moreno, M, C. Miler, & M. B. Bush, 1996. A
long pollen record from lowland Amazonia: Forest and cooling in glacial times Seiest
274:85-88.
CCorteal Ursego, G. 1981. Enid Cubs y Mapjome Plistoceica om Colombia.
Fundacion de Investigaciones Arqueologicas Nacionales, Banco de la Republica,
Bogots, Columbia. 148 pp.
G,.T. van det Hammen, & W. Hurt, 1972, Preceramie sequences in the
Rock Shelters, Colombia. Scene 17511061108,
Corzeal Urego, 1977, Imetigaciones Argon lot brie
Rewer del Teqnendama. Bibliotheca del Banco Popular, Premios de Arqueclogia,
Bogota, Columbia. 194 pp.
1s and extinct animals in pluval deposits neat
Phil. Ac.
1939 The occurrence of flints and extinct anim
cos Pro. Phila. Acad. Nat. Si 9:113-17.
Long, 1962, Arizona radiocarbon dates IL. Radicarboe 4:239-249.
PE, C. V. Haynes, Jr, & A. Long, 1964. Arizona radiocarbon dates V:
Radler
Davies, D. M. 1978, Some observations on the Otwalo sleton from Imbaburt
Province, Beuador, Pages 273-274 in A. L. Bryan, ed, Ear Man it Americ from a
ican Paiic Pepe. (Oceasional Papers No, 1, Department of Anthropology,
niversity of Alberta). Archaeological Researchers Internationa, Edmonton,
vial deposits near
HH, de Lumley, M.A, M. MC. Beltao, ¥ Yokayama, J. Labeysie, | Danon,
ne quateraitedatee du Pleistocene moyen dans la Toca da Esperanea, Region
Etat de Bahia, Antropol 91:917-942,
, ed. 1998, The Paoli of Siberia: New Disoneres and Interpretations
sty of Hlinois Press, Urbana, T1406 pp.
209ROOSEVEI (GLAS AND BROWN,
Dikoy, N.N. 1996, The Us
ed, American Baining
Chicago, IL.
Dilchay, T. D. 1989. Mone Verde: A Late Pisce Stement in Sntbra Chik, Vol.
Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C
one Verde Vo. 2. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC. 1071 pp.
=. 2000. The Senet of te Americas: A Nav Priory. Basic Books, New York,
NY.371 pp.
Dillhay, T. D, G. I. Ardila, G. Politi, & M. M. C. Beltao, 1992, Bariest hunters and
‘gntherers of South America J. World Preise 6:145-204
Di Peso, CC. 1965, The Clovis ated ps 1 Timmy Sie. Kine 3183-87
Dixon, EJ 1999. Bones, Boats & Bso. University of New Mexico Press,
NM. 322,
Dixon, EJ, TH. Heaton, T E, Fifield, TD. Hi
Late Quaternary regional geoarchacology of southeast Alaska Karst, A prog
12.
casts origin of fossil man in northwest. The New York
PG
996, The Pleistocene
sf North America, Pages 277-302 jn L. G. Suaus, BV. Exsken, M,
reds, Hamant a th End of the leeAge: The Archaea of the
New
PJ Walker. 1996, An archaeological end pal
ave, San Miguel Island, California. Radcurbon 38:385-373,
. & BJ, Meggers. 1961. Archaeological Investigntions in British Guiana,
Smithinian Initiation, Bure of American Ethno, Bulle 177. Washington, DC.
476 pp.
Fagan, B 1987, The Grat Journos: The Peplig of Anco Ameri, Thames and Hdsoo,
‘London. 288 pp,
Ferring, C. R 1989. The Aubrey Clovis sit: A Paleoindian locality in the upper
river basi, Texas. Care, Re. Plime 69-1
1990, The 1989 investigations
hice 7
194, Late Quaternary Gay of te Upper Trini Rive Basin
tation, Department of Geog Texas,
Ann Arbor, Ml
site, Texas. Ger Res
Aubrey C
Tosat PhD. disse:
Microfis,
CLOVIS AND PRE-CI
dh, Ancient Pople and Landcaper Muse
87. Prektery of the Amica. Cambri
386 pp.
1992. Proitery of the Ameria. Second edition. Cambridge Universiy Press,
Cambridge, England. 40 pp.
— . 1996 Letter. Sear 274:1821-182
1999, Older than we thougheImpications
Am Ania 6495-11
— 1999}, Artifact provenience at
University
Cambridge,
Of the northwest coast as a migration route for eatly
3» ed, Early Man in Ameria from a Circam Pac
Prac PD. dseron, Dep
Mo, University Microfilms, Ann Arbor
autROOSEVELT, DOU
AS AND BROWN
Goecco, C, & §. Mora. 1997, Late Peistocene/eatly Holocene topical forest occupa:
tions at San Isidro and Pena Rojo, Colombia. Antiuty 71:683-650.
igi and Inman colocation forthe Ameria: A New View rom
ion paper, Clovis and Beyond Conference, Santa Fe, NM.
Goebel, TR. Powers, & N. Bigelow: 1991. The Nenana complex of Alaska and Clovis
ly of the Fisst
Adepttions, Center for the Si
Anthropology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR.
Gramley, M. 1993. Th Rik Clos Cah, Persimmon Pre
Gruhn, R. 1991, Seafed radiocarbon-dated sites of C1
Pages 283-286 in R Bonnichsen & K. 1. Turnmive, eds, Clie Origins and
Adaptations Center for the Study of the First Americans, Department of
Anthropology, Oregon State Univers, Corvalis, OR.
994 The Pacific coast route of inital entry: An overview Pages 249-256 i R
Bonnichsen & D. G. thd and Theory for Investigating tbe Pring ofthe
Americans, Department of Anthro
the G
yan, 1977. Los Tapiales: A Paleoindian camps
highlands, Proc Am Phils. Soe. 121:295-273,
Guidon, N, & G Delibrias 1986. Carbon-14 dates poi
years ago. Nature 321:769-771
Haberle, &:G, & M.A. Masin, 1999, Late Quaternary v
ihe Amazon basin based on a 50,000 year pollen reco
932. Quat Res $1:27-38.
Hannus, L.A. 1990, The Lange-Fexguson ste: A case for mammoth-bone butchering
tools Pages 86-99 in L. D. Agenbroad, L. Mead, & 1- Nelson, eds, Magatama and
Man: Disomry of America’s Heartland. The Mammoth Sites of Hot Springs, South
Dakota, Inc. Scientific Papers, Vol 1
Harbour, |. 1975, General steatiga
‘man in the Americas 32,000
rages 33-56 in F. Wendorf & J.J Hester, eds,
27,000 years ago. Cam. Gag J. 9142-8.
fay, E, W, E. B, Sayles, & W. W, Wasey 1959. The Lehner mammoth st,
fem Asizona. Am. Autigut 25:2-30.
Haynes, C. V, Je 1964, Fluted projectile points: Thee age and dispersion. Scie 145
408-1413.
a2
CLOVIS AND PRE-CLOVIS VIEWED FROM SOUTH AMEI
1966, lep h America. Pages 44-52 in R.S. MacNeish ed,
Early Mon in Ameria, Readings from Scentfc American, W. H, Freeman, San Francisco,
cA.
‘of products of geological proceses. Some
diversity in Late Pleistocene South
lye AL. Bryan, Qua. Rec 4378-380
—— 1991. More on Meadowcroft chronology. Rex Archal 128-14
to the geochronology of the
the New World. Pages 355-374 i R. E. Taplor, A. Long & R.S. Kea, eds,
C Dating ard the Prplig of the New Wor Spinges Veeag, New York, NY.
Technical comment, See 275:1948,
America. Diovring
Aral Spc Report: Monte Verde Reisind December: 17-19.
Haynes, C.V, J, 8 G. A. Agogino. 1966, Prehis
Clovis site. Am Ansiguty 31:812-821
Haynes, CV, Je, PE. Damon, & D. C. Gres. 1966, Arizona radiocarbon dates VI
Radcarbon 81-21.
Hayaes, C.V, Je, D.C. Grey, PE, Damon, & R. Bi
VII. Redacarbn 9:11.
geochronology of the
1967. Arizona sadiocarbon
H. Brunswig, & K. D, Hopkins 1998. Kersey-Kunee
Dent and Bernhardt sites, Colorado. Geoerebawlegy 13
Earh Max is th San Paro Valley Angora: PhD. disseratio
2 University of Aizona. University Microfilms, AZ
268 pp
he New World, Sem 259:46-53,
, WR, Powers, & N. H. Bigelow: 1996, Dry Creek, Pages 343-354 in FH.
Americon Beginning: The Probiiory and Paleo of Borgia. University of
(Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
a3:VELT, DOUGLAS AND BROWN
V., 1997, Pabwsindion Gerbera
ress, Austin, TX. 297 pp,
Humphrey} D, & C.R. Ferring. 1994 Sable sorope
Souther High Plaine. University of
sene and
ings, J.D. 1983, Origins. Pages 25-69 ir}. Jennings,
‘WH. Freeman and Company, New York, NY.
+d. 1983, Anon! North Amerizon. WH. Freeman, San Francisco, CA. 642 pp.
W. Stafford, Je, H. O. Ajie, & D. P. Morrison. Ia press. Adlington
Pracadings of the Fifth Cabfornia Llane Smpiom, US.
ners
Lewis, 1998, Early mastime economy and El Nino events
Peru, Scene 281:1833-1835,
Klein, R. 1999. The Haonan Carer: Human Caltaral and Biologia Origins. University of
ess, Chicago, IL. 810 pp.
164 Early man in the New World, Pages 23-84 it }D. Jennings & E
Notbeck, eds, Prbierc Man i th New Warl. University of Chicago Press, Chicago,
diane in Beringia: Evidence from Antic
man waitin: I oe Ameri
cotigins.Yrbk, Ply Anthropol. 38:63.
Leake, LS, B, RD. Simpson, dT, Clemes 3 excavations inthe
ni: preliminary report. Sie 181: 305-310.
10, 1995, Dispersion de puns de proyectlbifaciales en la cuenc
‘media del rio Magdalena, Pages 73-82 in Ambo Oxypasioner Tonpraar de Ameria
Trpis. Fundacion ERIGAIE, Tasttuto Colombiano de Anteopologi, Bogota,
Columbia
Lopes de Cast
‘South Ame
[New Light onthe Peapling of the Ameria. la preparation for subsmiss
of Arizona Press, Tucson, AZ.
., & C. Niewenhuis ad, Clovis ffom the perspective of northern
CLOVIS AND PRE-CLOVIS VIEWED FROM SOUTH AMERICA,
xcography and Ecology of the Rain Forests
Press, Cambridge, England.
1980. Guitarra Cav: Early Mon inthe Ande. Academic Press, New York, NY.
48
1983, The Paleo-Indians, Pages 87-138 iv J.D. Jennings,
Americas. Wt H, Feceman, San Francisco, CA,
— . 1950, Gla
551199208
TE,RG
age man in South America? A critical review Am. Antiaty
229:864-867.
& | Gowlett. 1985. Chronology of Guitarero Cave, Per
Andover Foundation for Archacological Research, Andover, MA.
1992. The 1992 Excavations of Pondge ond Pinta Caner ear Oregrande, New
Mevia: An AFAR and Fort Biss Anboelgial Prot. Unpublished Report, Andover
gical Research, Andover, MA.
MacNeish, RS, R Berger, & R. Protsch. 1970, Megafauna and
highland Peru, Scena 168:975-977,
MacNeish, RS, RK. Viera, A. Nelken-Turner, & C.J Phagan, ds. 1980, Preity af
‘the Ayacncbo Basin, Peru. eo. 3. University of Michigan Press, Ann Acbor, MI. 333 pp.
MacNeish, RS, A. Garcia Cook, L. G. Lumbreras, RK. Vier, & A. Turner,
in Press,
from Ayacucho,
81, Praises of the Asacucho Basin, Por vol. 2. University of Michigan Press,
Arbor, MI. 266 pp.
RS, RK. Vier, A. Nelken-Torner, R
Preston of the Ayacubo Bari, Parvo. 4. Univers
MI. 280 pp.
MacNeish, RS, G. Cunnas, G. Jessop, & P. Wilnes 1993. 4 Summary of the Paoindion
Dieses in Pedijo Cae nar Orgrands, Now Meson The Anal Report of AFAR for
cal Research, Andover, MA. 48 pp.
1967, Prehistoric oveckil. Pages 75-120 ir PS E, Wright, eds
ie, & A. Garcia Cook. 1983
Martin & RG, Klein, eds, Quatrary Exanction: A Proctor: Reroation.
Acizona Press, Tucson, AZ.rian region. In Chr and Bond — Prpig of the Americar Confer,
Fe, New Mexico, October 28-31
Pleistocene of Alaska and the Yukon Terstory. Pages 353-381 in D.
V, Matthhews, Je, C. E, Schweger, 8 S. B. Young, eds, Paleowalay of Berna
Academic Press, New York, NY.
216
Neves, WA., D, Munford, & M.
variation and the colonizat
Paper presented at the Annus
Anthropology, Dutham, N.
Neves, WA, &H
An exploratory analysis based on eaty
21:261-273,
Nicuwenbuis, CJ. 1998. Unatractive but effective: Unretouched pointed lakes as pro-
jecile points? A clos the Abriase and Tequendamicnse artifacts, Pages
163-133 in M. G. Plew, ed, Espbratons in Anerson Archos: Est in Honor of
Wesky R. Hurt. University Press of America, Lanham, MD
‘Towards a four-migration model,
American Asssocation of Physical
ies of the fist American:
nth American remains. J. Ham, Evol
bio. Pages 283-308 ia B. Meggers, ed, Probie Sudamricoa
‘Taraxacum, Washington, D.C.
Nunez, a, & R. Casamiquela. 1994, Reconstroccion multidscplinara da la
prehistorica de Quereo, Centra de Chile. Lain Am. Antigly 59-118.
Tima Taima: A Late Phiswone Pao ldion Kil Ste i
CS/South American Quaternary Documentation
Program, Coro, Venezuela. 137 pp
Olives, | R, & CS. Alexander. 1990, The Pleistocene
‘The terace sequence of Rio Pedtegal and new.
‘he Firs World Summit Conference on the Papo
es oF western Venezuela
in Paraguana, Preis of
x. Cents for the Stady of
of Kansas, Lawrence, KS.
27ROOSEVELT, DOUGLAS AND BROWN
Perera, E. 1992. Analyse prelimiar das pintaras
do Muse Paraense Ei Goud sie Antropol. 85-24,
Pests, A.-M. 1999. The chronology and evolution of the prehistoric rock paintings in
Secra da Capivara
Oxford, England,
f South America: An
‘Turnmite, eds. Cli: Origine and
he First Americans, Oregon State Universiy,
overview: Pages 287-301 it R. Bonnichsen & K.
Adaptations. Cenet forthe Sead
Corvals, OR
F 1993. Dental evidence for the peopling of the New Worl: Some method:
logical considerations. Hum. Bol 65:799-819..
Powell, J.P, & W. A. Neves 1998. Dental diversity of early New World
te Out ofthe tripartite model. Paper presented atthe annual meeting of
n of Physical Anthropology. Am. Pls. Antapol, Supp.
the American Associ
Report on the Osteological Assessment ofthe “Kennewick
(CENWW97.Kennewick), Dicowring Archeology, Special Report
October 2951-21
Powers, W. R, 1996, Siberia i the late glacial and ear postglacial, Pages 229-242 i L
G. Strauss, BV. Eriksen, J. M. Evlandson, & D.R.Yesner, ed, Hamat atthe End of
‘thee Age The Arar of the Phiscone Holwene Trenton, Plenum, New York.
—— . 1986. Os mais antigos vestigis anqueologicos no Brazil Centra. Pages
173-182 in A. L. Beyan, ed, Nav Evidence for the Pistcene Paspling of the Ames
3, Univesity of Maine, Oro
Boquete, Minas Gerais, Breil. J. Soc Ameicaines
sof the oldest setlements in the America.
Archacologicl analy
Bra de Genetica 1689-699,
1999, Dating rock atin Brazil, Pages 29-3 fn M, Strecker & P Ba
Dating ad the Earbst Rack Art. Oxbow Books, O
Ranere A, & R. Cooke. 1991. Puleoindian occupation
Pages 237-253 in R Bonnichsen & K. L, Turi
es, Chae: Origine ad
28
CLOVIS AND PRE-CLOVIS VIEWED FROM SOUTH AMERICA
‘Technical comment. Sco 275:1948-1949,
‘The Mesa sit: A Paleoindian hs Acie
Anthropol, 325-30
Dating the rock at at Monte Alegre, Brazil. Pages 35-41 in M, Strecker
& P. Bahn, eds, Dating amd te Ears Keown Rock Art. Oxbow Books. Oxford,
0 end to the controversy over when and
weeface of science and sys
Resources, Washington, DC,
O0e. The Lower Amazon: A dynamic human habitat. Pages 455-491 in D,
Imperct Balen: Landape Tranfurmations in the Prelumbion Ameria
Press, New York,
Bio, 121-19,
219ROOSEVELT, DOUGLAS AND BROWN
tira Pres. In press
sahemispheric
row, eds, Chis in Contes: New Light othe
io to University of Arizona Press
perspective i A. C. Roosew
roping of he Americas In prepa
tucson, AZ,
inde. Environment, Subsistence, and Behavior in Human Es
san, ede, A Critiue of Soil Darwinism. In preparti
‘of California Press.
tnd, Clin Coto: New Light onthe Papig of the
Aner. Ia preparation for submission to University of Arizona Pres, Tueson, AZ.
Roosevelt, A.C.,R A. Housley, M. I da Silveira, S. Maranc, de R Johnson. 1991. Fighth
millennium pottery from a prehistoric shell midéen in the Brazilian Amazon. Siena
2541621-1624
evelt, A.C, ML. da Costa, C. Lopes Machado, M.
ation in B,
for sl
Reese, J A. Holman, N.
Americas: The peoping o
Roosevelt, A.C.
1, & JM. Crzent
Haven, CT. 179 pp.
Sales Barbosa, A. 1992. A tradicao Itapatica: Uma compreensao ecologies ¢ cultural
ddopovoamentoiicial do planalto central brasiliro, Pages 145-160 in B. Meggers, ed,
Prebisora Sudamericana: Nevar Pepe, Taraxacum, Washingeoa, D.C
Sandwess, D. H., H. Mclnais, RL, Burger, A. Cano, B. Ojeda, R. Paredes, M. C
Sandiweiss, & M.D. Glasscock. 1998. Quebrada Jaguay: Early South American mat
ime adaptations. Scene 281:1830-1832,
Sassaman, K.E, 1996, Early Archaic setdement inthe South Caro Pages
‘58-83 ir D. G, Anderson 8 K. E, Sassaman, eds, The Pandan and Ear Archaic
Southact, Universi of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
Schmitz, P 1987, Prehistoric hu
Schobinger, |. 1999. Argentoa’s
cds, Dating the Eabut Knoan Rach Art. Oxb
Scott, G Ry & C. G. Tuer, I. 1997, The Antirepalegy of Modern Hamat Tal: Detal
Morpblay and ts Variation in Recent Haman Population, Carbridige Universiy Pees,
Cambridge, England. 382 pp.
163. Veneoeon Arca. Ya rity Press, New
CLOVIS AND PRE-CLE
:WED FROM SOUTH AMERICA
1984, The Amazon: Linmolagy and Landape Eloy of a Mighty Tropical River
tr Basin. Dr. We. Junk Publishers, Dordrecht. 746 pp.
Simoes, M. 1976, Nota sobre duas pontas de Proje da Baca Tapajos (Para). Bal Mas
Paraense Emilio Geld NS. 62. Belem,
Simpson, R. D. 1978, The
Bryan, ed, Earh Man ional Papers No.
Archaeological
Snarskis, M. 1979, Tursalba: A Paleoindian quarry and workshop site in Eastern Costa
1. Am, Antiquity $4:125-138,
1984, Central America: The Lower Caribbean, Pages 195-252 in FW. Lange &
D.Z.Stone, ede, The Archalegy of Laver Cetal Americ. Unive
yaquerque, NM.
TW, Jes}
New Mexico
Press,
Staff
lity for Radioisotope A
s Late
accelerator 14
JL Mead, & LW. Nelson, eds, Mgafama and Mon: Dicey of
Hoard. ‘Tae Mammoth Si Springs, South Dakota, Ine, Hot
heen Arizona Universi, Flagstaff, AZ.
E. Hate, L Curse, A JE Hull, & D. Donahue. 1991, Accelerator
sel. J Anhatl.Sai 1835-72,
arty Man inte
love origins and adaptations: An introductory perspective,
‘in R. Bonnichsen &e K. L. Turnmize, eds, Clovis: Origins and Adaptations. Center fo the
Seudy of the First Americans, Department of Anthropology, Oregon State
versity, Corvalis, OR,
D.G, & JH. Powell 1993, Paleobiology of
138-146,
Snuver, M, P.J Rimes, E. Bard, |. W Beck, G. Bur, K.A. Hughea, B, Kromer, E.G.
MeCormas . van der Plicht, & M, Spurk. 1998. INTCAL 98 Radiocarbon age cai
bration, 4,000.0 cal BP. Radicarion 083,
‘Taylor, RE. 1987. Radcarion Dating An Archaeal Porpao. Academic Press, New
York, NY. 212 pp.
Americans. Evol Anti 2:
21LAS AND BROWN, CLOVIS AND PRE
IS VIEWED FROM SOUTH AMERICA,
tng, Pages 65-96 in RE. Taylor & M. J. Aiken, ed
nin Arba Ph ss, New York, NY.
ten, eds 1997. Chroametic Dating in Arch
i from eastern Beri
Cans: Naw Light on te Pepi
Unive
Arizoaa Press
raphic context and radiocarbon calibration. Ansigaty
a, Je, R. Gillespie, JA. J.
ahue, & R. Berger.
0 ke
[000 yeas B, P. Am. Anti
les of planes: Implications
8:227-248
ss, Boca Raton, FL.
New York, NY. 295 pp.
al
G2. The Fort Ppl
T&M. Al
Place, Pld. 109:247-261
van der Merwe, N, 8 Medina 1991. The x
Amazonia. J 1820-259,
Seer epee al
iu Fea 1957-283
Trl on te Amaro ad Ro Nays, London, Wd |
ques du Mato |
Wallace, A. R. 1889. 4 NV.
Lock. 363 pp,
Warnica, } M. 1966 ity 31:345-357,
West, FHL, ed sowoly of Bernie.
University of C
JN. 1998.
imes Nox. 2D
2 The New York |
ply. University of
on. Denver M
Natural History, Denver. 322 pp
8ROOSEVELT, DOUGLAS AND BROWN,
APPENDIX 1
Dates From High Plains Clovis Sites*
The Clovis Site, Blackwater Draw Locality 1, Clovis, NM
Weighed average of three dates om thre samples: 11,300 + 240 yr BLP. (13,180
eal)
of the seven reliably criteria
to0-old
The dates from the eponymous Clovis site fal 6
“They have too-arge error bars, are on material vulnerable to conta
carbon, are oa noncultual ea sal association In the region
fl sequence, they average 300 yr eater than dates from sts with high reliably scores.
The context was interpreted as all or scavenging was humic
Acid and lignin from pooled fagmens of natural
ones of mammoth prey could be dated by current AMS methods but haven
and lack of sec
abonized water plants. The amino
3,773, 13,722,
in bone bed, El Lano dig I, fom “grey sand” stata dscarbed by nearby artesian spring
chimaey. Caltaral associations of Clovis artifacts with this mammoth noted but not doc
‘lusteaions
8 cal) From pre-cultural “grey sand” layer ca 0.5 m
prey sand” strata cx. 1.0
Lebner, AZ
Weighted average of 12 dates on 12 samples: 10,950 & 40 yr BLP, (12,980 cal)
The dates fulfil all but ewo reliability criteria and are consistent with each other and
with reliable dates from other Clovis sites. However, the samples were aggregates of dis:
is subject to the old-wood problem,
24
DVIS VIEWED FROM SOUTH AMERICA
{gates of botanicaly-unidentifed charcoal fragms
charcoal problem. All sample sizes were adequate and
and matches high reli
cates have
acceptable. The series is
Clovis sites
+ 140 SMUI6S) (128
+90 (6MU340) (12,847 c
{SMUZ97) (12,839 ca)
12,725, 12,659 cal)
Murray Springs, AZ
Weighted average of eight dates om eight samples: 10,880 + 50 yr BLP. (12,923 cal)
Lehner, the lage date series Flfils
vidual specimen: samples and freedom from
‘neanally and with the reliable date
Te ste was interpreted as a kil site. The dated material was associated with
rmegafaunal bone and artifets. T spersed,
botanically unidentified wood charcoal flecks, which present potential old wood prob-
lems. The samples were associated wi
Only one of eight dates as too-lange erro
age, consistent with reliable dates from other Ce
the preference for
d-wood effects The seties is consistentROOSEVELT, DOUGLAS AND BROWN
103840 + 140 (SMU42 (12,902
340 + 70 SMU
10 + 160 (T145
D
902 eal)
(12847 eal)
Dent, CO
Weighted average of ssc dates om two samples: 10,750 + 40 yr B.P. (12,873 cal)
sion and potendal old carbon effects.
The sit i a probable kil, but it has been argued that che mammoth may not have
thle errr bars. Geological contamination from coal is documented. The pried bone
series is consistent ineznally bu als in the younger range of reliable dates from other
32,260 + 2100
SMU 120) lignite from the same matrix as the mammoth bone
charcoal from the same matrix as the mammoth bone
organic acids
1) XAD purified hydrolysate from mammoth bone
ie aid f
12,824, 12,708, 12,682 cal) alanine from same
Domebo, OK
Weighted average of seven dates on four samples: 10,944 + 59 yr BP. (12,978 cal)
ery large, and con:
ly and matches reliable
came from the
hone of
26
CLOVIS AND PRE-CLOVIS VIEWED FROM
SOUTH AMERICA
er bone sample was pur
‘mm contamination. The bone dates are ofien
J to as evidence for a pre-1,200 yr BP. age of Clo
‘inadequate in size and thus have very lange error bars from
wood samples were adequate size and gave small error bars. (Whether they were indi
aggregates were d speciied) All the dates are statistically
werage inthe range of reliable dates f
et Clovis sites
(S1172) (13,159 cal)
Ik unpurified onganic acids from mammoth
135 cal) humic acid from same
Lange-Ferguson site, SD
Weighted average of 00 dates on two samples: 11,100 + 160 yr B.P.
“The dates have low scares 0
sirable: pooled botanical
yetiteria but one, Sample materials were
ed da bits and unpurified mammoth bone
tr Cleaning procedures were not as sgorous sis possible at present, There
piece plotted, andS AND BROWN
Angiok, MT
Weighted average of three dates on one sample: 10,831 + 56 yr BP.
éesor-bars, and all were on adequate samples of human bone.
amino acids that were dated are not considered subject to carbon conta:
ination. Nevertheless there was only one bone sample from the relevant bua, and the
burial was not dseetlyassocated with aries. The burial ring con:
nd documented scientifically, Another skeleton atthe site
gave Holocene, not Pleistocene dats. This age
ciated diagnostic Clovis culucal
5, 11,783 cal) aspartic acid from same
Cally, WY
Weighted average of two dates on two samples: 10,960 + 120 yr BLP.
inbiltyesiteria. The ste was a posible i
ned. Projectile points were present,
for Clovis, Both dates have acceptable error bars and
dates from Clovis sites,
hee base forms are uns
11,200 + 220
1064 + 141
ca bulk, unpurified
a1392)
WED FROM SOUT
CLOVIS AND PRE-CLOVIS V RICA
UP Mammoth site, WY
No weighted average becanse onh a single date was available
bone sample and thus subject to contamination. It has a too-large erzor bar ands slight
ly older chan the series of high reliably dates from Clovis sts.
11,280 + 350% (44
sk
3174
organic acids from mammoth
Goshen Culture
‘Mill Iron, MT
aeighted average possible due to statistical inconsistency of associated dates.
The ste fais sx ofthe seven reliability criteria, Th site was a kil sice made wp of a
ts were internally
“The excavator
the material seemed o
that one san
ple was made up primarily of the lignite
‘contamination and staitialinconsist
chr
dentitied dispersed samples, They have one old-wood problem, if they ate indeed
coal. The samples have a documented association uch older geo
| carbon conta coal in one
sample. The assoc < rs charac
teristic of later Pal catly
Paleoindian Clovis and expect
ed for che culeural material. Inthe foure, the age ofthe site could be verified by dates
on purified amino acids from the bison bone in the bed,
23,720 + 220 (AA-3668) “charcoal” sample composed prf, DOUGLAS AND BROWN
) camp, processing area
processing area
Calture Undetermined
Aubrey, TX.
Weighted average of two dates on two samples: 11,570 + 70 yr BLP. (13,480 cal)
‘were reported from Trench B, from whic
samples are from a disturbed geological
surface atthe interface
uninants including ea
is age geological deposi was
slater Paleo
ed carbon aggregates
6493-98; Damon ef al 1966:100-1
ison & Todd 1986; Hannus
Hauey oa 1959, figure 97; Haynes ol 1966, 1967; Haynes
‘al 1998; Humphrey and Fei hardy 1966; Hester al
1972174176; 225, figure wef al 1987; Stafford 1990,
CLOVIS AND PRE-CLOVIS VIEWED FROM SOUTH AMERICA.
etal 1998. Weighted averages calculated by Linda Brown and John Douglas,
‘sing CALI)
cates a too-latge error,
Initial A and B calibrated radiocarbon and calendar TL and OSL
dates from Pedra Pintada cave, Monte Alegre culture.
yon dates fi all che elabilty criteria, and the TL/OSL dates fall but
1. The carbon samples were individual pieces of identified carbonized palm ot tee
fru or localized sediment samples.
@ inital A fuit seeds could be
food arate tthe seeds of the lt
ey accept, and such carbon
nee of human,
le contamination were nega
ike many Clovis dates AITL./OSL errors
ioearbon but typical for these techniques. All amples
\wete from specific, mapped localities during excavation. Although Clovis acl
also suggested tha there are too few date
ates, more than many Clovis sites ‘i
the same ranges. The radiocarbon series from each phase is
were larger thaa acceptable for
(The earliest TL date,
series) The radiocarbon range al
ther eastern Brain sites wi
TL/OSL
Initial A
A2SISW base, object 2 next to heath
‘TL of burned chalcedony bifcial reduction ake (outer, reected) (16190 + 930
ene
8346 bas, object 1
TL of burned chalcedony b
330 + 900 calt*
)TH AMERICA
DOUGLAS AND BROWN Pas vigiea rab
DVIS AND P
8345 object 4
£285 (GX
dates on four samples: 13,180 + 509 c
12,387 eal,
ed sacri 2.531
TL/OSL _
Initial B eneigueres
33 cal
8231 far SW, top, object 1
ened brecciated quartz flake 11,880
X-19538CAMS) 12,332 cl
12208 eal
Radiocarbon
Initial A
0 # 70 (GX-19537CAMS) 12052 c
1 samples: 10420 + 23 yr Bi
12,582, 12,522
12950 cal
875 + 295 (GX-17414) 12,920 al
TL/OSL
Initial A
yar samples: 11,075 + 106 13,123,
on Dake (oui, ejected) (16,190 + 930 cal)
Radiocarbon
Initial B
fake 15,330 + 900 cal
seed 10,583 + 80 (NZA9898) 12954-12,681 calROOSEVELT, DOUGLAS AND BROWN,
Initial B
8231 far SW, top, objec
L of burned brecciated quarts ake 11,880 + 760 cal
Radiocarbon
Initial A
ied rucuma.
average 3, 13,088, 7
8231CW top,
acer en
8231 CW
‘wood charcoal frags
ocaep 10,560 + 60 (B6952CAM
10,450 + 60 (B76952CAMS)
CLOVIS AND
mate from sacuti endocarp
83M
indicates a too large ero
1S VIEWED FROM Si
2 78 (GX-17400CAMS) 12,333 cal
(CX-19538CAMS) 12332 eal
I) 12203 cal