Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Eurocodes evolution:
preparing for the
second generation
Steve Denton and Mariapia Angelino provide an overview of the background, status and
transition timetable for the second-generation EN Eurocodes that are in development.
24
November/December 2022 | thestructuralengineer.org
CEN/TC 250’s response to Mandate and has led the reporting required to the be agreed to guide all those authoring
M/515 contained clear descriptions EC and EFTA. Working in tandem with Eurocodes. This primary target
of the standards to be reviewed in BSI, NEN has thus made a significant audience was defined as ‘Practitioners
each phase, together with associated contribution to the programme. – Competent engineers: Civil, structural
background, reasons for the change, and geotechnical engineers, typically
key benefits and outputs. Key updates CEN/TC 250 objectives qualified professionals able to work
in the work programme included At the outset, CEN/TC 250 unanimously independently in relevant field’. In
extension of current rules for the agreed two overarching objectives to addition, nine further categories of users
assessment of existing structures, guide its decisions and priorities for were identified and, for each category,
strengthening of requirements for the evolution work: first, to enhance a statement of intent to meet users’
robustness, and considerations of the ease of use of the Eurocodes; and needs was agreed (Table 1).
relevant impacts of climate change on second, to achieve an exemplary level CEN/TC 250 adopted a series of
structural and geotechnical design. of international consensus. governing principles and priorities to
New developments included a new guide drafting. These included general
Eurocode on structural glass, new CEN Enhancing ease of use aims like enhancing understandability,
Technical Specifications for design of CEN/TC 250’s vision for the second navigation, consistency between the
fibre-polymer composite structures generation of Structural Eurocodes is Eurocodes, and avoiding fundamental
and tensile surface structures, and new ‘to create a more user-orientated suite changes to design approach or
Eurocode parts on atmospheric icing of design standards that are recognised structure unless adequately justified.
and actions from waves and currents on as the most trusted and preferred in the More specific aims included providing
coastal structures. world’. clear guidance for common design
To help deliver the work programme, To support this vision, in 2013, the cases, providing adequate freedom for
over 70 funded project teams Chair of CEN/TC 250 established a innovation, and improving consistency
containing five or six experts were Chair’s Advisory Panel (‘CAP on ease of with product standards.
established, working to a defined brief use’) to develop recommendations for Additionally, CEN/TC 250 put in
under the direction of CEN/TC 250 and the approach to be taken to enhance place a broad array of innovations and
the relevant CEN/TC 250 subcommittee ease of use. The 15 members of this activities to promote enhancements
or working group. The leadership and CAP provided a balance between in ease of use. These have included:
membership of these project teams Eurocodes stakeholders, with a strong establishing the role of M/515 Technical
was decided through open international representation from practitioners. The Reviewer to scrutinise evolving
competitions. Three calls for experts recommendations of this CAP were drafts and make recommendations
were held: in 2015 for phase 1, in unanimously endorsed by CEN/TC 250 to enhance clarity and consistency;
2016 for phase 2, and in 2017 for and have been instrumental to CEN/TC developing comprehensive guidelines
phases 3 and 4. The Netherland’s NSB, 250’s efforts to meet users’ needs. and examples to augment CEN’s
NEN, organised the call for experts, The CAP recommended that a drafting rules; and holding multiple
administered the associated contracts clearly defined primary target audience ‘informal’ enquiries on drafts to collect
Category of Eurocode user CEN/TC 250 statement of intent to meet users’ needs
Practitioners – Competent We will aim to produce Standards that are suitable and clear for all common design cases without demanding
engineers disproportionate levels of effort to apply them
We will aim to produce Eurocodes that can be used by Graduates where necessary supplemented by suitable
Practitioners – Graduates
guidance documents and textbooks and under the supervision of an experienced practitioner when appropriate
We will aim not to restrict innovation by providing freedom to experts to apply their specialist knowledge and
Expert specialists
expertise
Working with other CEN/TCs we will aim to eliminate incompatibilities or ambiguities between the Eurocodes and
Product manufacturers
Product Standards
We will aim to provide unambiguous and complete design procedures. Accompanying formulae will be provided
Software developers
for charts and tables where possible
We will aim to use consistent underlying technical principles irrespective of the intended use of a structure (e.g.
Educators
bridge, building) and that facilitate the linkage between physical behaviour and design rules
National regulator We will endeavour to produce standards that can be referenced or quoted by National Regulations
Private sector businesses We will continue to promote technical harmonisation across European markets in order to reduce barriers to trade
We will produce Eurocodes that enable the design of safe, serviceable, robust and durable structures, aiming to
Clients
promote cost-effectiveness throughout their whole lifecycle, including design, construction and maintenance
Other CEN/TCs We will engage proactively to promote effective collaboration with those other CEN/TCs that have shared interests
25
thestructuralengineer.org | November/December 2022
Key
SC – Subcommittee AFNOR – French National Standardisation Body
WG – Working Group ENQ – CEN Enquiry
CCMC – CEN Management Centre FV – CEN Formal Vote
DIN – German National Standardisation Body
feedback from users via NSBs, through FIGURE 1: officially comment on the draft prEN standards made available to NSBs, by
which thousands of constructive Eurocode standard. Prior to ENQ, the prEN draft early 2026.
development process
comments have been received. is checked by the CEN/TC 250 Chair In parallel with this intensive period of
and Secretary, reviewed by the CEN finalisation and formal acceptance of the
Exemplary levels of consensus editorial team and translated into French second-generation Eurocodes, CEN/TC
Achieving consensus is fundamental and German. 250 is initiating communication activities
to CEN/TC 250’s ambitions and In addition, as noted previously, to help with the transition to the new
a real challenge given the scale, to support ease of use and consensus- standards. For example, general
complexity and international impact building objectives, during the presentations have been prepared
of the Eurocodes and the evolution project team drafting stage, CEN/ outlining the key changes to each of the
programme. Many specific initiatives TC 250 undertook multiple additional Eurocodes. These are available from
have been enacted to help build informal enquiries for all Eurocode the JRC Eurocode website (https://
consensus, including CEN/TC 250 parts to collect and respond to eurocodes.jrc.ec.europa.eu/2nd-
unanimously agreeing behavioural comments on interim drafts. generation).
expectations and a five-step process to After ENQ, comments made by In addition, a series of ‘Eurocodes
help resolve differences of view. NSBs are addressed by the relevant Evolution Explained’ videos is
Ultimately, the formal votes taken subcommittee or working group, which being produced and plans have
by NSBs on the final drafts of the prepares the final EN draft. After further been developed for detailed
Eurocodes will confirm whether or not checks, editing and translation, the CEN technical briefings.
the exemplary levels of consensus Formal Vote (FV) is launched. This is At a national level, new national
achieved are indeed exemplary. Current when NSBs submit their final vote on annexes need to be developed and
indications are encouraging, however. whether they agree the draft standard. transition plans enacted by relevant
During hundreds of formal decisions authorities, and these topics will be
taken by CEN/TC 250 through NSB Where we are now? covered in future articles. But in the
voting associated with the execution CEN/TC 250 has developed a meantime, the current suite of first-
of the work programme to date, of comprehensive publication schedule generation Eurocodes remain the
the many, many thousands of votes and planner to track progress at all applicable standards for structural
cast, direct negative votes have been stages of the Eurocode development. and geotechnical design and should
measured in single digits. The 78 Project Teams appointed for the continue to be used.
four phases of the work programme
Development process have all completed their work. CEN Dr Steve Denton MA, PhD, FREng,
The development process for each ENQs and FVs are happening twice a FICE, FIStructE is Head of Civil and
Eurocode part is based on CEN rules year: March and September for ENQ; Bridge Engineering at WSP UK,
and consists of a series of stages April and October for FV. Chairman of CEN/TC 250, and Visiting
(Figure 1). After the finalisation of the The first ENQ was launched in Professor at the University of Bath.
work by the Project Teams, the relevant 2019 for EN 1996-1-1. In the same Dr Mariapia Angelino MEng(Hons),
subcommittee or working group starts year, the first FV was launched for CEN/ PGDip(Hons), EngD, CEng, MICE is a
the preparation of the standard for TS 17440 on assessment of existing Consultant at WSP Italy, as well as a
CEN formal enquiry (ENQ), when NSBs structures. To date, 26 ENQs and 15 Technical Reviewer and Member of the
FVs have been launched. Management Group for CEN/TC 250.
26
November/December 2022 | thestructuralengineer.org