EDA MARIE L.

ENCLONAR

IN RE: AL C. ARGOSINO
246 SCRA 14

FACTS:
In 1993, the petitioner was found guilty of homicide by reckless imprudence in connection with the
death of Raul Camaligan, which was caused by the "hazing" that was carried out as part of fraternity
initiation procedures. After eleven days, he submitted a request for probation, which was approved.
After a month had passed, he was permitted to file a Petition for Admission to Take the 1993 Bar
Examinations. He passed the bar exam, but due to a lack of moral character, he was not permitted to
take the lawyer oath of office.

ISSUE/S:
Whether or not good moral character is needed to be accepted as member of the bar. 

RULING:

Yes. Prior to being granted the ability to get a license to practice law, the candidate must
demonstrate "upright character." The only people who can enter and remain in the profession are
those who pass the test and uphold the standards. It is a privilege that comes with requirements,
one of which is the maintenance of good moral character. The petitioner's involvement in the
"hazing" actions was wholly irresponsible and fell far short of the required level of moral
uprightness. With this, the Supreme Court instructed the petitioner to provide them with proof that
he now complies with the standard of good moral character required of persons applying for
admission to the bar.