1939 CLEMENTE vs. GALVAN Issue: Can either of the partners claim ownership over property belonging to the partnership before liquidation? Facts of the Case: Plaintiff (P) and Defendant (D) organized a civil partnership to engage in the manufacture and sale of paper and other stationery. They contributed equal amounts of money. D was entrusted with management. In less than a year, P asked for the dissolution of the partnership. D agreed, with a condition that P reimburse him for half the amount of a deficit incurred by the partnership which he had covered with his own money. Before final liquidation of its affairs, P filed a petition asking the court to order the delivery of certain machines to him and to charge their value against his portion in the partnership. This was granted by the court. However, before P could take actual possession of said machines, and upon strong opposition of D, the court suspended the effects of its previous order. In the meantime, judgments for money-recovery cases against the partnership were rendered. To avoid the attachment and subsequent sale of the machines by the sheriff for the satisfaction of said judgments, P mortgaged the machines to his nephew. When the terms in the mortgage expired, P’s nephew commenced a case to collect his mortgage credit. Ruling: No. (Article 1811)The machines in contention originally belonged to the defendant and from him were transferred to the partnership. This being the case, said machines belongs to the partnership and not to him, and shall belong to any partner until partition is effected according to the result thereof after the liquidation