Trump’s trade war is a good example to study tariff’s impact on
trade for many reasons. First, most of the tariff announcements were abrupt, so it’s hard for people to anticipate and respond. In addition, the tariffs are large enough to create variation across products, time and countries so that economists can make causal argument. Most of trump’s tariff policies were carried out in 2018, including charging high tariff on goods imported from china like solar panels, washing machines, aluminum, iron and steel. Retaliatory tariffs were also enacted on trading partners like china, Russia, Mexico and European union. According to research, almost all of the tariffs from trump’s trade war are passed to US importers and customers. This is quite surprising because according to trade policy theory, for a large economy like US, tariff should drive down foreign price, so a fraction of tariff should be paid by exporters, i.e. terms of trade exist. We can see from the long difference that the price received from exporters are almost unchanged after imposing the tariff, so US importers and customers bear the price. If we want to see how a specific event affects the outcome over dynamic horizon, we can use event study, considering the HTS10-time and country time fixed effect, while also adding a treatment month indicator. Some research believe that the motivation of trump’s trade war is domestic electoral success, not the sector-specific lobbying that results in most trade protectionism. The evidence are that lobbying and tariff protection have negative correlation, electorally competitive US counties are more protected by US tariffs, and electorally more Republican counties are more retaliated by other countries. According to Flaaen, Hortacsu, Tintelnot (2020), after products are tariffed, firms often move production to countries that aren’t affected by the tariff. In this case, Korean washing machines are tariffed by the US, so firms move production to countries like china, Thailand and Vietnam. Therefore, we can see that tariff can’t make firms move production to US or increase employment. In addition, washing machines and dryers are complementary goods. although dryers weren’t tariffed, washing machines were tariffed, according to the study, dryers’ prices go up similarly as a response to washing machine tariffs. Therefore we can conclude that tariffs on a certain good will affect the price of its complementary goods.