KARNATAKA POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED Annexure A PROJECT DATA FOR PRUDENCE CHECK Name of the ESCOM: KPTCL Zone + Tumakuru Circle + Davanagere W & M circle Division + Chitradurga MW division Location : Konasagara Work Code 81100 Project Description Establishing 1X12.8, 66/11KV Sub-Station with associated line Date of Sanction 22-May-19 Estimated Cost Rs, 902.0 Lakhs Awarded Cost + Rs.977.23 Lakhs Date of Work Award 12-May-20 Date of Commencement ——:-28-May-20 Targeted Date of Completion: 11-May-21 ‘Actual Date of Completion: 10-Dec-21 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK |. Briefly record the reasons (circumstances necessitating) for taking up the work. : Presently.the areas in and around Konasagara are fed by 1 No. Of 11kV feeder each from 66/1 KV B. G.Kere Sub-Station,Hangal Sub-Station and Gowrasamudra Sub-Station, : The installed capacity of 66/1 1kV BG Kere Sub-Station is 1"12.5 MVA,66/11KV Hangal Sub-Station is 2°8 MVA and 66/1 1kV Gowrasamudra Substation is 1°6.3 MVA +1"8 MVA. . Existing 66kV Gowrasamudra SC line emanating from 220KV Thallak Sub-Station has recorded peak oad of 10 MW with Coyote conductor. The installed capacity of 220kV Thallak is 2° 100MVA with peak load of 120 MW. Il. What was the Primary/Major objective or the purpose intended to be achieved! Results to flow from the work? Please quantify the results intended (Ex:Meeting the load of ....MVA/KVA) . ‘There will be reduction in the length of 11KV feeders feeding that area which reduced the interruptions. : Tail end. voltage of these 11kV feeders will also improve. : Future load growth can be catered. : ‘There will be improvement in voltage profile of the areas fed from the proposed 66/1 1kV Konasagara ‘Sub-Station. IIL Whether the primary objective / Results of the work was intended to be achieved in full on completion of the work or was it meant for a phased realisation7a. To be achieved in full on commissioning b. To be achieved in phases of 1st Yea 2nd Year :..uj 3rd year: ....% and $0 on. Intended to be achieved in ful on Completion 20% achieved as on date, ‘any, to be achieved and the time planned for such achievement: IV, List other intended objectives, = name ote Objective ee | June 17, 2022 Page 1 of 41 2 || aeons 4] @ ‘The load on the existing 66/T1KV BG kere langal and Gowrasamudra substations will \V. Planning of Expenditure: | S| amount att) [Ty seams poataa (Zils Oc = a niall la oo] Suns oun | sp wa | Vi Details of financing plan for the project undertaken, if any. Else Please provide the sources from which the funds were diverted Commercial Bank, provided, Mention the basis on which Vil. Provide the list of alternatives considered. Ifthe alternatives at the proposed scheme is finalised Alternative-t in the proposal, bifurcation of 11KV lines by express/ink lines using Rabbit ACSR from existing 66/1 1kV ‘Sub-Stations at BG Kere, Hangal and Gowrasamudra are studied. ‘After bifurcation of load, the regulations cannot be brought down to permissible limits. List of basis on which proposed scheme is finalised. {Total load on proposed 1°72.5 MVA Konasagara sub-station will be 6962 KVA 2.Proposed for construction of 66RV SC line from existing 66kV Gowrasamudra Substation for a distance of 7km ‘along with construction of 1 No. Of 66KV Terminal bay at 66KV Gowrasamudra. 3.Annual energy savings willbe 3.1254 MU. 4.-Approximate cost of the project is Rs 609.08 Lakhs. S.BCR will be 2.53. Vill, Details of Cost Benefit Analysis and Payback period calculations. Whenever projects were taken up with CBA < 1 or Payback period higher than 5 years, specify reasons for taking up the same ‘Annual Energy savings 3.1254MU and 4.26/30 Years PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Project Performance | Results in terms of the Objectives |. Cost Data Analysis: | Sanctioned/ Awarded Cost of Estimate : Rs.977.23 Actual Expenditure + Rs. 683.75 Comparision of actual expenditure Vs SanctionediAwarded Cost ——;_-Rs. 293.48 Less Variation in % of the cost of Sanctioned estimate /Awarded Cost 1-30.03 % Romarks : Financially not closed June 17, 2022 Page 2 of 4I. Schedule of Implementation Targeted date of completion as Actual Date of Completion Per Detailed Work Order; 11-May-21 + 10-Deo-21 Time Overrun : OYears 7 Months Reasons for dela f delay/ delays y, If any, as ascertained (describe reasons attributable for project delay! justification for ; vs atbutable to Contractor or Licensee ) : 'e 11KV PCVCB P.O was issued | Ltd Bangalore ts deloyoa sued to M/s MEI Itd, Bangalore. The 11KV PCVCB supplied by M/s MEI Swners/ 1,22 in completion of transmission line works were due to severe ROW issves, protest by the land 9 farmers and almost unreasonable demands lke demanding more than the KPTCL orders. he delay due to Ist wave and lind wave Covid-19 pandemic, there is a considerable delay in the execution ofthe project. lil. Primary Objective (Quantitative description . Ex : Demand in MVA met te) Actual Achievement after Completion: 90.0 Load taken on 12.5 MVA transformer is 5 MW IV. Other Objectives realised till date si ~] No BS Quantity, ‘Plan achievement aa ip 0.0 0.0 Z| E 00 oo] ray = rs |4 | Be ara8 0.0 0.0 1B TThe load on the existing 66/1 TRV BG kere Mangal and | 330/390 Gowrasamudra substations will be reduced i) ‘Observations on outstanding features/ Major problems in the design / implementation of the project : 19 pandemic, there is a considerable delay in the : ‘The delay due to Ist wave and lind wave Covi execution of the project . : The delay in completion of transmission line works were due to severe ROW issues, protest by the land owners! farmers and almost unreasonable demands like demanding more than the KPTCL orders. V. Capitalisation / Asset Categorisation : Status of Accounting and Categorisation ‘Amount of ‘Amount of Date of Asset | Amountof asset | gorreciation mount si le tergorisation(in | Categorisation(In pacts a charged(In Rs. capitalised (In Rs. [No Remarks | Re.Lakhe) | ReLakhs) | SPAGEANO RS [oP | ee eo oo] «(00 tie or: | aay Ona 0.0 0.0 - |_00 00 00 31-Mar-22, 683.27 «| 14.42 8.02 (51.26 € je} | Lakhs | | tree cut compansation/employee | | Costiterest curing ‘construction/DEPT MENT | I UPPLY/SURVEY June 17, 2022 Page 3 of 4[EXPENSES/CONTINGENCY Observations on asset categorisation and capitalisation: es ‘sotive Engineer (Ble) Stoned ajor Works Sub-Division Executive Engineer (Ele) KPTCL, Chitradurga Major Works Division KPTCL, Chitradurga June 17, 2022 Page 4 or4Salas POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMITED Annexure B SCORING OF PRUDENCE CHECK PROJECT Work Code + BC1100 Place : Konasagara Project Description: Establishing 1X12.5, 66/1 1kV Sub-Station with associated line Maximum] Marks- | Marks- Pai 1C Remarks some Marks | Division | TAQC Tecan ie | Planning Investment Proactive or] 5 Reactive DPRand Cost Benefit | E ‘Analysis, t Alternatives 5 5 | implementation ‘Schedule Of = ; implementation “| Cost Ofimplementation | 10 | 10 | fe | ‘Quality OF Execution 10 | 100 Ex-Post Analysis chievement of Primary] 9 | 450 bjective [achievement of Other | 4g | gg ‘Objectives Total | 100 | 92.80 Asst Exog hve Engineer (Ele) Execttive hears — Divisi Major Works Division Seer Hedda oe KPTCL, Chitradurga June 17, 2022