You are on page 1of 2

2019 Sixth International Conference on Internet of Things: Systems, Management and Security (IOTSMS)

Blockchain Technology in Supply Chain


Management: Preliminary Study
Soha Yousuf, Davor Svetinovic
Center for Cyber-Physical Systems
Khalifa University
Abu Dhabi, UAE
Email: davor.svetinovic@ku.ac.ae

Abstract—Despite significant research, the supply chain man- Blockchain has already demonstrated proof of its appli-
agement challenges still have a long way to go with respect cability alongside RFID (Radio-Frequency IDentification) in
to solving the issues such as management of product supply constructing an agri-food SC traceability system targeting
information, product lifecycle, transport history, etc. Given the
recent rise of blockchain technology in various industrial sectors, China’s food market safety issue [20]. Real-life applications
our work explores the issues prevalent in each stage of the supply have also been implemented with the likes of Capgemini and
chain and checks their candidacy for the implementation using IBM collaborating to develop a model for managing containers
blockchain technology. The analysis is performed in terms of intelligently with blockchain technology [9].
the characteristics of trust and decentralization with respect to A framework consisting of a set of constructs has been
forming a generalized framework. The main contribution of this
work is to create a conceptual overview of the areas where developed that determines the character of blockchain in
blockchain integrates with supply chain management in order achieving supply chain goals via a discussion of some use
to benefit further research and development. case scenarios [11]. Despite the proposition of blockchain
Index Terms—blockchain, trust, decentralization, supply chain implementation in supply chain literature, none have evaluated
management its suitability and feasibility specifically, for the main stages
of the entire supply chain, given its many complex levels of
I. I NTRODUCTION interactions. Therefore, the aim of this paper is to form a
Supply chain management (SCM) is a pivotal sector of an generalized framework evaluating the suitability of blockchain
organization and is described as the supervision and control technology based on the blockchain’s innate characteristics
of all relationships (both upstream and downstream) between against the addressed issues for each supply chain stage.
manufacturers, suppliers and customers to deliver greater
customer value at an economical rate to the supply chain as a II. P RELIMINARY F INDINGS
whole [10]. The research methodology is based on systematic paper
SCM operational efficiency is measured through its perfor- reviews to achieve the following: define the stages of a supply
mance against the greater demand ambiguity, higher supply chain; and define the blockchain characteristics “trust” and
risk, and increasing competitive intensity. Therefore, increased “decentralization” as well as their definition within the scope
transparency through better information exchange is impera- of a SC. A generalized frame of reference is formed addressing
tive [13]. This consistent need for transparent traceability of the suitability of applying blockchain to the SCM stages via
goods due to inconsistent or unavailable data, lack of inter- extracting the necessary publications that link the blockchain
operability, and limited information on the product’s lifecycle characteristics mentioned above to SCM issues. Finally, evalu-
or transport history will continue to present a significant goal ating the conducted study against literature that have proposed
for future supply chains [21]. These particular problems in solutions to “trust” and “decentralization” issues in SCM.
SCM have actually been addressed through the proposition Based on the discussion above of the various strategies
of applying blockchain technology that has shown to counter proposed to solve SCM issues related to distrust, commitment,
transparency and security inefficiencies. transparency, information exchange, and efforts to mitigate the
Blockchain technology is a distributed, decentralized ledger BWE, most of the propositions still require an established
allowing transparent direct peer-to-peer transactions between trust base, collaboration and consolidation of the information
participants without the presence of a third party mediator. The technology and shared information, being cost-ineffective in
use of this technology is currently setting a new foundation implementation, and addressing the information confidentiality
for transparent and trustworthy vendor-supplier relationships issue. On the other hand, blockchain technology serves to
[19]. This is achieved through the use of immutable data address all of the above supply chain issues as well as the
documentation, distributed storage, and authorized user admit- shortcomings of the proposed solutions.
tance. Another advantage of using a blockchain system is the Lo et al. [12] demonstrated a similar study to this work by
elimination of single points of failure due to the blockchain proposing a generalized suitability evaluation framework to an-
system’s decentralized nature [1]. alyze the fitness of blockchain implementation based on a list

978-1-7281-2949-5/19/$31.00 ©2019 IEEE 537


2019 Sixth International Conference on Internet of Things: Systems, Management and Security (IOTSMS)

of criteria. Based on the traits of multi-party, trusted authority, whether implementing blockchain technology would suit their
centralized operation, data transparency versus confidentiality, supply chains. We will also construct a formal model, evaluate
data integrity, data immutability, and high performance, supply it by applying it to Ethereum platform, and incorporate the
chain was regarded as one of the use cases which qualify for results within the context of our current work on blockchain
blockchain implementation. The study conducted here differs systems [2]–[4], [7].
from the mentioned work in that it assesses the applicability
R EFERENCES
of blockchain on each supply chain stage, specifically against
the characteristics of trust and decentralization as opposed to [1] Saveen A Abeyratne and Radmehr P Monfared. Blockchain ready
manufacturing supply chain using distributed ledger. 2016.
assessing its suitability on the entire supply chain as a whole. [2] N. Z. Aitzhan and D. Svetinovic. Security and privacy in decentralized
Despite the encouragement for the greater information shar- energy trading through multi-signatures, blockchain and anonymous
ing for an improved supply chain performance, the resistance messaging streams. IEEE Transactions on Dependable and Secure
Computing, 15(5):840–852, Sep. 2018.
towards this goal has been reiterated throughout the text [3] Enas Al Kawasmi, Edin Arnautovic, and Davor Svetinovic. Bitcoin-
is linked with privacy issues. Blockchain can also ensure based decentralized carbon emissions trading infrastructure model. Sys-
increased privacy protection while still offering a trustworthy tems Engineering, 18(2):115–130, 2015.
[4] I. Alqassem, I. Rahwan, and D. Svetinovic. The anti-social system prop-
platform via the use of digital identity to manage authenticated erties: Bitcoin network data analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems,
individuals to access the data through the use of “smart Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, pages 1–11, 2018.
contracts” (a computerized transaction protocol that executes [5] Israa Alqassem and Davor Svetinovic. Towards reference architecture
for cryptocurrencies: Bitcoin architectural analysis. In 2014 IEEE
the terms of a contract [8]). Furthermore, using a variant of International Conference on Internet of Things (iThings), and IEEE
blockchain technology known as “permissioned blockchain” Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber,
can also help circumvent the privacy issues. Implementing Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom), pages 436–443. IEEE, 2014.
[6] Erik Casagrande, Selamawit Woldeamlak, Wei Lee Woon, Hatem H
the supply chain stages on a permissioned ledger would Zeineldin, and Davor Svetinovic. Nlp-kaos for systems goal elicitation:
overcome the identified limitations of blockchain — low Smart metering system case study. IEEE Transactions on Software
throughput, price instability, and lack of authority, the eco- Engineering, 40(10):941–956, 2014.
[7] T. Chang and D. Svetinovic. Improving bitcoin ownership identification
nomic constituent (by limiting who amends the ledger) while using transaction patterns analysis. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man,
still benefiting from the advantages of the technology [14]. and Cybernetics: Systems, pages 1–12, 2018.
As for the weaknesses, for example, it is not convincing that [8] Konstantinos Christidis and Michael Devetsikiotis. Blockchains and
smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access, 4:2292–2303,
the relationship between blockchain trust and SCM trust is as 2016.
direct as assumed in the paper. It is evident that it is critical [9] Daniel Heinen. Blockchain in supply chain management – in the future,
to preserve the trust in SCM systems and the blockchain trust must be earned rather than paid.
[10] Mark Ko, Ashutosh Tiwari, and Jörn Mehnen. A review of soft
technology is a good candidate but the implementation is computing applications in supply chain management. Applied Soft
critical. However, we believe we first have to resolve the Computing, 10(3):661–674, 2010.
critical lack of the connection between blockchain trust and [11] Nir Kshetri. 1 blockchain’s roles in meeting key supply chain man-
agement objectives. International Journal of Information Management,
SCM requirements at the architecture and framework-levels as 39:80–89, 2018.
we have done in our security-related work [5], [15], [16], [22]. [12] Sin Kuang Lo, Xiwei Xu, Yin Kia Chiam, and Qinghua Lu. Evaluating
Furthermore, the overall analysis of the systems must be done suitability of applying blockchain. In Engineering of Complex Computer
Systems (ICECCS), 2017 22nd International Conference on, pages 158–
in a comprehensive modeling or (semi-)automated fashion to 161. IEEE, 2017.
ensure full coverage of all the cases, e.g., [6], [17], [18]. [13] Hokey Min. Artificial intelligence in supply chain management: theory
and applications. International Journal of Logistics: Research and
III. C ONCLUSION AND F UTURE W ORK Applications, 13(1):13–39, 2010.
[14] Morgen E Peck. Blockchain world-do you need a blockchain? this chart
Our work explored a preliminary framework to evaluate will tell you if the technology can solve your problem. IEEE Spectrum,
the suitability of blockchain based on its characteristics of 54(10):38–60, 2017.
[15] Husam Suleiman, Israa Alqassem, Ali Diabat, Edin Arnautovic, and
providing increased trust and decentralization in the following Davor Svetinovic. Integrated smart grid systems security threat model.
supply chain stages: order fulfillment, supplier relationship Information Systems, 53:147–160, 2015.
management, manufacturing flow management and demand [16] Davor Svetinovic. Architecture-level requirements specification. In
STRAW, pages 14–19, 2003.
management. The focus of the paper was on the main four [17] Davor Svetinovic. Strategic requirements engineering for complex
of the eight SCM stages since these processes were the sustainable systems. Systems Engineering, 16(2):165–174, 2013.
most researched in literature in terms of the problems faced [18] Davor Svetinovic, Daniel M Berry, Nancy A Day, and Michael W
Godfrey. Unified use case statecharts: case studies. Requirements
towards achieving effective supply chain performance. Each Engineering, 12(4):245–264, 2007.
supply chain stage was researched in literature in terms of the [19] Abra Technology. Why artificial intelligence and blockchain will change
problems which would cater towards the need for trust and supply chains.
[20] Feng Tian. An agri-food supply chain traceability system for china
decentralization constructs in order to qualify for blockhain based on rfid & blockchain technology. In Service Systems and Service
implementation resulting in the proposed framework. Management (ICSSSM), 2016 13th International Conference on, pages
As part of the future work, we will conduct a formal system- 1–6. IEEE, 2016.
[21] Oliver Wyman. Blockchain: The backbone of digital supply chains.
atic review covering the rest of the SCM stages to formulate a [22] Nauman Zafar, Edin Arnautovic, Ali Diabat, and Davor Svetinovic.
complete framework that would serve as an effective reference System security requirements analysis:a smart grid case study. Systems
for academics to build upon as well as for industry to assess Engineering, 17(1):77–88, 2014.

538

You might also like