Professional Documents
Culture Documents
MATEMATICA : CALCULO
Areas of controversy: Global mortality analyses of the type reported here have
been criticized for making estimates of mortality for regions with limited,
incomplete and uncertain data. Estimates presented here use a range of
techniques depending on the type and quality of evidence. Better evidence on
Accepted: July 10, 2009
*Correspondence to: levels of adult mortality is needed for African countries.
Dr Colin Mathers, World
Growing points: Considerable gaps and deficiencies remain in the information
Health Organization, 20
Avenue Appia, 1211 available on causes of death. Nine of 10 deaths in 2004 occurred in low- and
Geneva, Switzerland. middle-income countries, reinforcing the fundamental importance of improving
E-mail: mathersc@who.int
British Medical Bulletin 2009; 92: 7–32 & The Author 2009. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved.
DOI:10.1093/bmb/ldp028 For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org
C. D. Mathers et al.
Introduction
An important input to national and international health decision-
making and planning processes is a consistent and comparative analysis
of the causes of death across different population groups. Assessing the
causes of death across all regions of the world requires a framework
for integrating, validating, analysing and disseminating the fragmen-
tary, and at times contradictory, information that is available on
numbers of deaths and their cause distributions. World Health
Organization (WHO) maintains a mortality database1 that includes
detailed annual tabulations of deaths from the death registration
systems of Member States, with causes classified in most cases accord-
ing to the 9th or 10th revision of the International Classification of
Diseases (ICD).2
Over the last decade, the WHO has intensified efforts to support the
collection of vital registration information and other mortality data in
developing countries. The number of countries reporting data on recent
death registrations to WHO annually has increased from around 65 in
1970, 90 in 1999, to over 110 in 2009 (Table 1). Regional coverage of
death registration varies from close to 100% in the European region to
around 50% in the Asia-Pacific region and less than 10% in Africa.
However, death registration is considered to be essentially 100% com-
plete in only 64 of the countries reporting data, and predominantly
these are the developed countries in Europe, the Americas and the
Pacific region (Table 1).
In terms of actual deaths recorded by registration systems, data are
provided to WHO annually for about 18.6 million deaths, representing
one-third of all deaths estimated to be occurring in the world. Taking
account of the representative data from multiple registration systems
for India and China (described in the following section), population-
level information on mortality and causes of death is available for
around 72% of the world’s population.3
Death registration 3 21 2 40 1 12 79
data with coverage of
85% or more
Death registration – 12 7 11 1 3 34
data with coverage of
*China and India both maintain systems in which deaths are recorded in a representative sample of
districts across the country. Cause of death for most deaths is attributed using data collected using the
VA methods (see text).
†
Some of these countries do collect data on deaths in hospitals or urban areas, but these data cannot
be considered to provide a representative picture of cause-of-death patterns at the population level.
causes of death. The paper also examines some of the data gaps, uncer-
tainties and limitations in the resulting mortality estimates.
Results are presented here for high-income countries, treated as one
group, and for low- and middle-income countries grouped by WHO
regions. Results are available on the WHO website9 for other regional
groupings, including World Bank regions and the regions used for
monitoring progress to the Millennium Development Goals and for
192 countries. The 2004 estimates discussed here have also been used
to prepare updated projections of mortality by cause for all regions of
Table 2 Methods used for cause-of-death estimation for 2004, by WHO region.
*Epidemiological estimates obtained from studies, WHO technical programmes, CHERG and UNAIDS for
the following causes: AIDS, TB, diphtheria, measles, pertussis, poliomyelitis, tetanus, dengue, malaria,
schistosomiasis, trypanosomiasis, Japanese encephalitis, Chagas, maternal conditions (including
abortion), all major causes of death in the neonatal period and in children to age 5, drug use disorders,
rheumatoid arthritis and war.
Central Asia (Table 1). Deaths coded to the ICD codes for ‘symptoms,
signs and ill-defined conditions’ as well as certain ill-defined codes
within the cancer, cardiovascular disease and injury chapters of ICD
were re-distributed across defined causes.17 The percentage of deaths
coded to these ill-defined causes varied from 4% in New Zealand to
more than 30% in Sri Lanka and Thailand.3 Cause of death was esti-
mated for one-third of global deaths in 2004 using information from
the death registration data (Table 2).
China and India, two countries with large populations (20% and
Results
Life expectancy
Life expectancy at birth in 2004 ranged from 79 years in high-income
countries down to 50 years in sub-Saharan Africa. This is a 1.6-fold
difference in total life expectancy across major regions of the globe.
Overall, for the entire population of the world, average life expectancy
at birth in 2004 was 65.6 years, an increase of almost 9 years over the
last quarter century. Life expectancy increased during the 1990s for
most regions of the world, with the notable exception of Africa and
the former Soviet countries of Europe.44
COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IHD, ischaemic heart disease; TB, tuberculosis.
*This category also includes other non-infectious causes arising in the perinatal period, apart from
prematurity, low birth weight, birth trauma and asphyxia. These non-infectious causes are responsible
for about 20% of deaths shown in this category.
†
Self-inflicted injuries resulting in death can also be referred to as suicides.
C. D. Mathers et al.
Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/bmb/article/92/1/7/332071 by guest on 04 November 2022
Table 4 Leading causes of death by income group, 2004.
Disease or injury Deaths Per cent of Disease or injury Deaths Per cent of
(millions) total deaths (millions) total deaths
COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; IHD, ischaemic heart disease; TB, tuberculosis.
*
Countries grouped by gross national income per capita—low income ($825 or less), high income ($10 066 or more).
†
This category also includes other non-infectious causes arising in the perinatal period, which are responsible for about 20% of deaths shown in this category.
Global and regional causes of death
Fig. 4 Differences in causes of child death, 2004. Note: High-income countries have been
excluded for each WHO region and are shown as a single group at the top. Source: Ref. 7.
than double that of any other region (Fig. 4). The two leading commu-
nicable disease killers in all the regions are diarrhoeal diseases and res-
piratory infections. Deaths directly attributable to malaria occur almost
entirely in the African region, representing 16% of all under-five
deaths in that region.
South-East Asia
One-third of the 527 000 global deaths due to pregnancy and child-
birth (maternal causes) occurred in South-East Asia in 2004.
Accidental fire deaths were high in this region and caused twice as
many deaths in women as in men. An extraordinary 80% of global
fire-related deaths among adult women occurred in South-East Asia.
Many fire deaths are probably related to cooking accidents but this is
not the only cause. In India, fire is implicated in an estimated 16% of
suicides in women and an unknown number of homicides.46
Discussion
The original GBD study, initial results of which appeared in the 1993
World Development Report,47 was the first attempt to provide
comprehensive regional and global estimates for mortality by cause for
a comprehensive set of more than 130 causes. Earlier attempts to
quantify global cause-of-death patterns were largely restricted to
broad cause-of-death groups (e.g. all infections and parasitic diseases
combined).48,49
In updating global cause-of-death estimates over the last decade, the
WHO has focused on individual countries as the unit of analysis, with
the systematic application of standardized approaches for countries in
each category for mortality data availability as well as drawing much
more extensively on the detailed analyses of cause-specific data carried
out in priority areas by WHO and other international agencies. This
has greatly improved the cross-population comparability of cause-
specific death estimates as well as increasing the usefulness of the
results for country-level health situation assessment and priority
setting. More attention has also been paid to assessing uncertainty in
both national and global assessments of cause-specific and all-cause
deaths. This uncertainty must be taken into account when making
cross-national comparisons, and needs to be carefully communicated
and interpreted by epidemiologists and policy-makers alike.
Controversy
Previous global mortality analyses of the type reported here have
been criticized for making estimates of mortality for regions with
limited, incomplete and uncertain data, and have even been charac-
terized by some critics as having at best only tenuous links to empiri-
cal evidence.51 Murray et al. 52 have argued systematic assessments
and synthesis of the available evidence, which attempt to ensure con-
sistency and adjust for known biases, will almost always provide a
better basis for health planning than ideology or special interests.
The analytical approach used here has been strongly influenced by
demographic and economic traditions of making the best possible
estimates of quantities of interest for populations from the available
data, using a range of techniques depending on the type and quality
of evidence.
Acknowledgements
The views expressed in this paper are entirely those of its authors and
do not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the
World Health Organization or its Member States. Valuable inputs
were provided by WHO staff from many departments and by experts
outside WHO. While it is not possible to name all those who contribu-
ted to this effort, we would like to particularly note the contributions
of Bob Black, Cynthia Boschi-Pinto, Somnath Chatterji, Richard
Cibulskis, Simon Cousens, Chris Dye, Mercedes de Onis, Majid Ezzati,
Marta Gacic Dobo, Peter Ghys, Kim Iburg, Mie Inoue, Eline
Korenremp, Joy Lawn, Steve Lim, Silvio Mariotti, Erin McLean,
Donatella Pascolini, Juergen Rehm, Serge Resnikoff, Lisa Rogers,
Alexander Rowe, Lale Say, Suzanne Scheele, Kenji Shibuya, Andrew
Smith, Karen Stanecki, Jose Suaya, Jos Vandelaer, Theo Vos and Lara
Wolfson.
Funding
This work was funded by the World Health Organization.
References
1 Mahapatra P, Shibuya K, Lopez AD et al. (2007) Civil registration systems and vital statistics:
successes and missed opportunities. Lancet, 370, 1653–1663.
2 World Health Organization (1992) International Classification of Diseases and related health
problems—Tenth Revision (ICD 10). Geneva: WHO.
3 Mathers CD, Ma Fat D, Inoue M, Rao C, Lopez AD (2005) Counting the dead and what
they died from: an assessment of the global status of cause of death data. Bull World Health
Organ, 83, 171–177.
4 UNAIDS, WHO (2007) AIDS Epidemic Update: December 2007. Geneva: UNAIDS.
5 World Health Organization (2006) Global Tuberculosis Control: Surveillance, Planning and
Financing: WHO Report 2006. Geneva: World Health Organization.
6 World Health Organization (2008) World Malaria Report 2008. Geneva: World Health
Organization.
7 World Health Organization (2008) The Global Burden of Disease: 2004 Update. Geneva:
World Health Organization.
8 Lopez AD, Mathers CD, Ezzati M, Murray CJL, Jamison DT (2006) Global Burden of
Disease and Risk Factors NY: Oxford University Press.
9 World Health Organization (2008) Global Burden of Disease Estimates. Geneva: WHO.
Available at http://www.who.int/evidence/bod (accessed 28 November 2008).
28 World Health Organization (2006) World Health Report 2006: Working together for Health.
Geneva: WHO.
29 Zupan J, Ahman E (2007) Neonatal and Perinatal Mortality: Country, Regional and Global
Estimates. Geneva: World Health Organization, Department of Making Pregnancy Safer.
30 Preston SH (1976) Mortality Patterns in National Populations. NY: Academic Press.
31 Murray CJL, Lopez AD (1996) Estimating causes of death: new methods and global and
regional applications for 1990. In Murray CJL, Lopez AD (eds) The Global Burden of
Disease. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 118–200.
32 Salomon JA, Murray CJL (2002) The epidemiologic transition revisited: compositional
models for causes of death by age and sex. Popul Dev Rev, 28, 205 –228.
33 Chapman G, Hansen K, Jelsma J et al. (2006) The burden of disease in Zimbabwe in 1997
52 Murray CJL, Mathers CD, Salomon JA (2003) Towards evidence-based public health. In
Murray CJL, Evans D (eds) Health Systems Performance Assessment: Debates, Methods and
Empiricism. Geneva: World Health Organization, 715–726.
53 Bryce J, Boschi-Pinto C, Shibuya K, Black RE (2005) WHO Child Health Epidemiology
Reference Group. WHO estimates of the causes of death in children. Lancet, 365,
1147–1152.
54 Murray CJ, Lopez AD, Feehan DM, Peter ST, Yang G (2007) Validation of the symptom
pattern method for analyzing verbal autopsy data. PLoS Med, 4, e327.
Lo que el COVID-19 nos ha recordado es que vida es el bien más preciado y esta va de la
mano con el cuidado de la salud.
Apa:
Mathers. C.D, Boerma.T, & Fat, D.M.(2009). Global and regional causes of death .British Medical.
Bulletin 92, 7–32.https:// DOI:10.1093/bmb/ldp028