Professional Documents
Culture Documents
16
AD 306: Additional Moments in Braced Bays: 1
/2 0
/0 7
This is the first in a series of ADs that comment on the forces and moments to be designed for in
20
beam-column-bracing connections in braced frames. AD 304 pointed out that the nominal
moments that are assumed from beam eccentricity cannot be ignored, even if forces in the bracing
n
system have been calculated from a pin-jointed analysis. This AD covers common connection
ko
details and offers advice on how the connections can be designed.
.u
The first common case is where the centre lines of the members are coincident, as shown in
co
Figure 1.
h.
D
yt
bl
T
nd
V
ha
e
CL
ac
yt
H
Br
M = He = VD
bl 2
@
ng
Column
ro
st
m
Floor beam
e
.ar
sop H
CL B
vid
da
to
V
ed
ns
ice
.L
Two models are commonly adopted for the design of the connections shown in Figure 1.
er
In the first model, the connection to the column is designed for a moment equal to He, where e is
at
the vertical eccentricity from the beam centreline to the point the bracing centreline meets the
m
column flange. Generally, this moment is dealt with by assuming that the point of rotation is the
ed
bottom flange of the beam. The vertical shear through the connection is the beam reaction, plus
the contribution from the component of the bracing force. If this model is adopted, the nominal
ht
moment in the column is due only to the assumed eccentric reaction of the beam shear. There is
ig
no contribution from the bracing force to the nominal moment in the column.
yr
p
An alternative model is to assume that the bracing is connected to the beam, and that the beam
Co
end connection remains truly pinned. In this case the end connection of the beam carries no
moment, but must carry the beam shear and the vertical component of the bracing force. The
16
column must be designed for the nominal moment from the assumed eccentric beam shear, plus
an additional moment equal to V × D/2 where D is the column depth.
/2 0
In Figure 2 the setting out point (sop) of the bracing has been shifted to the intersection of the
/0 7
beam centre line with the column face. This is very similar to the second model described above, in
that the column must be designed for an additional moment equal to V × D/2. It is also clear from
20
Figure 2 that the vertical component of the bracing force adds to the shear in the beam from gravity
n
loads, and this must be checked. The end connection is designed as a pin, to carry the vertical
ko
load from the bracing and the beam itself.
.u
D T
co
CL
h.
e
ac
yt
Br
bl
CL
nd
ha
yt
V bl
@
Floor beam
ng
sop H H B H H sop
CL
ro
st
Column Column
V
m
.ar
vid
da
M = VD
to
2
ed
T
ns
16
D T L
V
/2 0
/0 7
CL H
20
CL CL
n
ko
sop
.u
co
Floor beam
h.
yt
CL B
bl
nd
Column Column
ha
yt
sop
bl
HB
@
M=
2
ng
M = HB HB
2 Q= Q
L
ro
Q
st
In Figure 3, the common and convenient situation of shifting the sop to the junction of beam and
column flanges is shown. The main effect is the additional moment equal to V × D/2 to be included
da
in the column design. Additional shear and bending is produced in the beam, but this is generally
to
In summary, the additional moments that arise in braced bays due to the location of the setting out
ig
point must be added to the usual nominal moments from the beam end reactions and accounted
yr