Professional Documents
Culture Documents
case:
1.recognize unique characteristics of employees outside US, is critical for adoption of agile
implementation success
Culture script: phenomenon used to describe behaviors
a) In china: One person’s favor is eventually repaid; individuals aware of social context and
preserve it; avoid of confrontation
b) In south korea: tendency to value quick and quality task completion; emotional bonding through
repeated social interaction
c) In india: Jugaad, apne log and social hierarchy
Areas where culture script can create challenges:
Maintaining flexibility and speed, creating communicating channels, building effective agile team
Solutions:
1. Maintaining flexibility and speed: streamline improvisation, bring organizational legitimacy to
them; Contract to decide the scope and schedule of project to prevent it from being extra
aggressive
2. Building effective team: Disperse authority across multiple individuals, encourage individual
decision making
3. Communication channels: Informal meetings, communicate difficulty of adopting agile
ING Vyasa case- What to expect from agile:
1.Adoption of TANGO and RIO initiatives to transform organization
2.Lokking into agile methodology to improve employee engagement and customer orientation
3.Issues: bureaucracy, silos, cultural problems
4.reorganized teams into squads(9 members each)- handle customer related activity
Lessons from ING vyasa:
a) Decide how much authority senior management is willing to let go of to customers
b) Assuring stakeholders of finance, legal and compliance functions
c) Experience tribes: attract new customers; service tribes: take care of existing customers
d) Pop up squads : manage one off short term projects
· Speed matters
· digital economy→Agility
· Small teamsàown objectives→define their metrics for success and as a whole delivery is done
· The concept of continuous release and knowledge sharing is essential to the effectiveness of
empowered teams
· Rapid innovation depends on teams learning quickly what does and doesn’t work
· when experiments fail→managers → act as coaches, posing questions and eliciting hypotheses
and expected outcomes
· Knowledge sharing- Discuss issues, new discovery, stand up meetings,collaborative toolsà away
from command-and-control approaches
What the miltary can teach oragnisation about agility
· Organisation are being forced to adapt at a speed for which they simply are not built.
· four decision cycles of observe, orient, decide, and act in order to respond quickly to sudden external
threats.
· Individuals and teams closest to the problem→offer the best ability to decide and act decisively
· Leaders should be absolutely clear about what decisions only they can make and push all other decisions
as far down the organization as possible.
· decisions by committee – No →decisions by the individuals and teams who are closest to a particular
issue- yes
· It means focusing on the “why” and “what,” while leaving the “how” to those closer to the front line
· The vision was to develop a leadership doctrine which is principles-based, rather than rules-based.
· Leaders being actively receptive and responsive to new and changing external conditions
Challenge- Managers who recognize the need for organizational change usually fail to see themselves as
one of the things that needs changing.
A new Approach to Designing work