Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Economic and Political Weekly is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend
access to Economic and Political Weekly
realistic and desirable target. No matter which scenarioThe other structural shift in the Indian economy is a demo
graphic one, with significant implications for skills. The increase
one ends up believing, the challenge of skill
in gdp growth has itself been partly driven by an increase in
development - both in quantitative and qualitative the share of working-age population in total population. This
terms - is enormous and requires a careful policy stance.
demographic dividend comes but once in the life of any nation.
It is defined as the benefits derived from a rise in the ratio of
working age (usually 15-59) to dependent or non-working
population (usually under 15 and over 60-year olds). When the
share of population above 60 years goes over 10% of the total
population, the United Nations (un) defines that society as age
ing. China's demographic dividend will be over by 2015; India's
is expected to continue till about 2040 (World Bank 2012).
The benefits of demographic dividend come from the fact
that as the share of working-age population rises; they get
work, earn incomes and save part of that income. As a result,
savings as a proportion of gdp rises. Following a standard
Harrod-Domar model logic, investment's share in gdp rises
correspondingly. It is this rise in the savings-investment ratio
that is a major part of the explanation of the high gdp growth
story of India, though there are many other factors.
This underlying rise in the share of the working-age population
brings with it its own risks. First, employment must be found
for this growing population of working-age. Employment in
creased in the first half of the 2000s (1999-2000 to 2004-05)
over the five-year period by 60 million, but it hardly grew in
the second half. Employment in manufacturing actually fell in
the second half of the decade (2005-10) by five million and in
services the increase has been only four million (Mehrotra et al
2012). Hence, increasing non-agricultural employment will re
The authors are grateful to the comments of an anonymous referee.main a challenge, if the total factor productivity (tfp) growth
we have seen in the first half of the decade is to continue.
Santosh Mehrotra (santosh.mehrotra@nic.in), Ankita Gandhi (ankita.
gandhi@nic.iri) and Bimal K Sahoo (bimal.sahoo@nic.iri) are with the However, sustaining tfp increases will, from this point on,
Institute of Applied Manpower Research, Planning Commission, also depend on improving the educational (general and
Government of India.
vocational) and skill level of this growing workforce. In other
102 march 30, 2013 vol xlviii no 13 03X53 Economic & Political weekly
Indian labour force, and to estimate the number of persons Not literate 125.7 29.1 26.7
required to be skilled by 2022, i e, the end of the Thirteenth Five Literate without formal schooling:
education guarantee scheme (EGS)/
Year Plan. The paper is divided into three sections. Section 1
non-formal education courses (NFEC)/
presents current status of level of education and vocational adult education centre (AEC) + total
literacy campaigns (TLCs) + others 2.1 0.5 0.5
training (vt) of the labour force using National Sample Survey
Below primary + primary 102.4 23.7 21.8
(nss) 2009-10 data. Section 2 discusses skill requirement for
Middle 76.1 17.6 16.2
2022 under three different scenarios, and the last section pro
Secondary 52.4 12.2 11.1
vides the conclusion.
Higher secondary 29.2 6.8 6.2
proportion of the entire labour force in agriculture, industry people in the labour force for all age groups (470 million) are
and services. Those engaged in agriculture, numbering 244 mil receiving or have received technical education.
lion in 2009-10, clearly cannot be said to be unskilled in their These estimates presented above suggest that the scale of
main vocation of crop production and/or allied activities in the problem, while not being as stupendous as suggested in
agriculture; for centuries they have been reasonably skilled the Eleventh Plan, is certainly very challenging. Further, we
farmers. It is only when they migrate out of agriculture into noted above that in an economy which has been growing at
non-agricultural activities that they can be referred to as "un nearly 8% per annum during the Eleventh Plan period and
skilled". Hence, in Table 2 we not only focus on the stock of the which is expected to grow between 8% and 9% per annum
vocationally trained in the labour force in the age group 15-59, during the Twelfth Plan, the scale of challenge is only going to
but estimate the share of the stock of vocationally trained in increase. Moreover, the scale of challenge will be multiplied by
the non-agricultural labour force. Interestingly, the vocationally the fact that the rte (2009) will increase enrolment in the
trained in this age group in the labour
Table 2: Vocational
Vocational Training
Training in
in Labour
LabourForce
Force(PS+SS)
(PS+SS)ininthe
theAge
AgeGroup
Groupofof15-59
15-59
force turned out to be 20% (Table 2). Serial Estimated Percentage Share in the Share in the
the Percentage
Percentage of
of Percentage
Percentage
oflndustrial
The number of this stock of the voca No Numbers Labour Force in Labour Forcefor
Force forNon-Agriculture
Non-Agriculture of Industrial
in '000s the Age
Age Group
Group of
of All Age
All AgeGroups Workforce
Groups Workforce Workforce
59) in the industrial (i e, manufactur 1 Receiving formal vocational training 1,892 4.3 0.4 0.4 0.9 1.9
2 Received
Receivedvocational
vocationaltraining:formal
training:formal 9,006 20.6 2.1 1.9 4.2 9.1
ing and non-manufacturing) workforce
consists of 99 million workers, and the 3 Received vocational training
non-formal, of which: 32,719 75.1 7.6 6.9 15.2 33.0
vocationally trained as a proportion
Received vocational training
of all workers in industry is 44%. This non-formal: hereditary 11,897 27.3 2.8 2.5 5.5 12.0
104 MARCH 30, 2013 VOL XLVIII NO 13 Economic & Political weekly
elementary schools, thus increasing the number entering the From among those who have some sort of technical educa
secondary level, thus increasing the demand for vocationaltion, the vast majority of them have a diploma in te below
training and education in the country. graduate level. As against technical education, the situation is
slightly better in vocational training where overall 10% of the
Educational Qualification and Vocational Training of workforce in the age group of 15-59 years received some form
Workers in the Primary, Secondary and Tertiary Sectors:of vocational training (Table 6, p 106). Of these, only 2.3% are
Despite making considerable progress in terms of literacy
formally vocationally trained. Of the 5% vocationally trained
(particularly after launching of Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan), highin agriculture, 4.7% (i e, a proportion of 92%) are due to non
incidence of illiteracy cripples the workforce. As in the previformal training. In agriculture, of all those trained informally,
ous sections, the estimate for workforce in the age group 15-59
65% were due to hereditary transfer of knowledge. Within manu
years, which is 421 million, is used rather than the 460 millionfacturing, 27% of the workers are vocationally trained, of which
workforce for all age groups. Out of the 421 million workers in 86% are non-formally trained. What is remarkable is that
the age group of 15-59, 125 million (or 30%) are illiterate
Table
Table4:4:Estimated
EstimatedNumber
Number
of Workers
of Workers
(PS+SS(PS+SS
in the in
Agethe
Group
AgeofGroup
15-59) of 15-59)
(Table 4). As expected, the proportion of illiterate workers isby
by Level
LevelofofEducation
Education
by by Sector
Sector (million,
(million, 2009-10)
2009-10)
Level
Levelof
ofEducation
Education Non
Non Services
maximum in agriculture and allied activities (40%), followed Agriculture Manufacturing Total
and Allied manufacturing
by the non-manufacturing sector (33%). literate
Not literate 87.4 9.6 14.4 13.7 125.0
Bulk of the workforce in the non-manufacturing sector (40) (20) (33) (12) (30)
(90%) is in construction works. The second half of the decadeBelow primary ++ primary
primary ++
tor has resulted in a shift in the workforce away from agricul 00)
(10) (15) (10) (17) (12)
Higher secondary
ture into non-agricultural occupations. Given the low level ofHigher secondary and
andabove
above
(diploma/certificate/ 15.5 8.1 3.5 40.4 67.5
education of agricultural workers, the sectors to which they
graduate/postgraduate)
graduate/postgraduate) (7) (17) (8) (37) (16)
migrate also have very high incidence of illiterate workers. Total 219.2 47.9 43.5 110.0 420.6
420.6
Surprisingly, 47% of our manufacturing workers have pri (100) (100) (100) (100) (100)
This is an estimate of the education level of the workforce in the age group 15-59 years,
mary or below primary level of education. Also, services sector
using their PS + SS. Figures in parentheses are percentage shares.
has the highest share of those who have completed higher sec
Source: Computed from NSS (66th round), 2009-10.
education among the workers. This is Diploma or certificate (below graduate level)
in: agriculture 7 18 13 127
127 176
176
precisely the case across sectors (agri
Diploma
Diplomaororcertificate
certificate
(below
(below
graduate
graduate
level) level)
culture, manufacturing, non-manufac in engineering/technology
in engineering/technology 241 897
897 375
375 1,477 2,989
turing industry and services) (Table 5). Diploma or certificate
certificate (below
(below graduate
graduate level)
level)
in medicine
Out of a total of 219 million workers 12 08 05 420
420 445
4%, 2%, and 6%, respectively. Out of Diploma or certificate (graduate and above level)
in: crafts 05 23 8 38 74
the workforce of 421 million in age
Diploma or certificate (graduate and above level)
group 15-59 years, merely 2.5% have
in: other subjects 246
246 135 147
147 969 1,496
acquired technical education. Of the Total (1+2+3)
(1+2+3) 754 869
1,937 6,951 10,511
total workforce of 460 million, only Of total sector % (sector
( sectortotal
totalininmillion)
million) 0.3(219)
0.3 (219) 4(48)
4(48) 2(44)
2(44) 6.3 (110) 2.5 (421)
about 2.3% have technical education. Source: Computed from NSS (66th round), 2009-10.
Economic & Political weekly 0353 march 30, 2013 vol xlviii no 13 105
Table
Table8:8:Estimate
Estimate
of Skill
of Skill
Challenge
Challenge
for Indiafor
by India
2022 (in
bymillion)
2022 (in million)
SrNo
SrNo 2009-10
2009-10 2022 Remarks
1 Total workforce 460.2 575 Based on projection and explanation given in the previous section
2 Presently skilled 143.2 143.2 Skilled is defined as the workers having either vocational training or educational
level secondary and above. Here vocational training includes technical education
and TE is complete subset of VT. By this definition presently there are 143.1 million
skilled workers.
workers.ltIt isis assumed
assumed that
that those
those who
who are
are skilled
skilled in
in 2009-10
2009-10 will
will remain
remain skilled
skilled
in 2022. This implies that those skilled workers are not moving out of workforce by 2022.
3 Maximum additional to be skilled 317 432 For 2022, this is 575 million minus 143 million (1-2). This assumes there is a need to
train all agriculture workers and non-agriculture workers.What it implies is that all
agriculture workers will be skilled and in non-agriculture we will not have any worker
with less than secondary level education. Both these assumptions are highly optimistic.
4 Total agricultural workers 245 190 Here for 2022 we have assumed that agriculture's share in total workforce will
decline to 33%.
5 Skilled workers in agriculture 45 38
In 2009-10, about 18.5% of the agriculture workers are skilled. We assume it to go
up slightly to 20%. Total skilled workers required in agriculture by 2022 will be 38
million. Only a slight increase is assumed since most with secondary education
presently in agriculture will move out of agriculture.
6 Less
Less than
thansecondary
secondarylevel
levelworkers
workersin in
agriculture
agriculture 200 152.0
152.0 This isis the
thedifference
differencebetween
betweentotal
total
agriculture
agriculture
workers
workers
and skilled
and skilled
workers
workers
in in
agriculture
agriculture(4-5)
(4-5)
7 Total
Total non-agricultural
non-agriculturalworkers
workers 215.2
215.2 385.0
385.0 This
This is theisdifference
the difference between
between total workforce total workforce
and total agriculture workers (1 -4) and total agriculture workers (1-4)
8 Skilled workersininnon-agriculture
Skilled workers non-agriculture 97.4 347.0
347.0 In 2009-10
2009-10about
about45%
45%ofofthethenon-agriculture
non-agriculture
workers
workers
are skilled
are skilled
by our
bydefinition.
our definition.
We assume
assumethis
thispercentage
percentagewillwill double
double by 2022,
by 2022, and only
and only 10 percentage
10 percentage of of
non-agriculture
non-agriculture workers
workerswill
willhave
have
lessless
thanthan
secondary
secondary
education.
education.
9 Less
Less than
thansecondary
secondarylevel
level 110 38.0
38.0 In 2022 it is assumed
assumed that
that not
not more
more than
than 10%
10%of
ofnon-agriculture
non-agricultureworkers
workerswill
willhave
have
non-agricultural
non-agriculturalworkers
workers (51%) (10%) less than
than secondary
secondary level
level education
education
10 Total skilled workers 143.2 385.0 In all sectors - skilled workers in agriculture + non-agriculture (5+8)
11 Total workers with less
less than
than secondary
secondary level
level 317 190.0 In all sectors
sectors
(460-143)(152
(460-143)(152 ++ 38)
38)
12 Additional requirement
Additional requirementfor
for2022
2022 249 Total skilled workers by 2022 will be 385, out of which 143 are already skilled. Thus,
242 million additional are required to be trained. However, in 2009-10 in agriculture
45 million workers are skilled. But in 2022 we need only 38 million. Therefore, seven
million skilled agricultural workers moving out of agriculture need to be trained in
non-agricultural trades. Therefore, additional to be trained are (385-143+7)
Source: Authors' estimate based on NSS 2009-10.
Economic & Political weekly MARCH 30, 2013 VOL XLVIII NO 13 107
would have acquired at least some form of skills by 2022. So We have assumed that by 2022 the majority of those in the
the capacity for skill training that needs to be establishednon-agricultural
by workforce, in fact 90%, will have at least sec
2022 will be 250 million (301 - 51), and not 500 million. ondary level of education. This is consistent with the expecta
tion that the rte will be realised not only up to class 8, as in
Scenario 2: The above estimate of 250 million to be trainedthe
by current version of the rte Act 2009, but up to and includ
2022 is one scenario. We now present a second scenarioing
(inclass 10 (or secondary level) by 2022. In other words, it is
expected that by 2022 all children up to the age of 16 years will
Tables 8,9 and 10) based on two further assumptions which were
not present in the above estimate of 250 million. The first be completing secondary level of education. This may appear
new
to be an ambitious goal today, but recall that the goal of Sarva
Table
Table 9:
9: Distribution
Distribution ofof575
575Million
Millionand
andAdditional
Additional Skilled
Skilled
Workers
Workersbyby
Sectors
Sectors and
and by
by Skill
Skill Level,
Level,Assuming
AssumingShare
ShareofofAgriculture
Agriculture Will
WillCome
Come
Down Shiksha
Down Abhiyan when it was launched over 10 years ago was
to 33%
33% byby 2022
2022
that elementary schooling (classes one to eight) will be com
Agriculture Manufacture Non Services Total
and Allied manufacture pleted by all children by 2010.
Less than secondary Scenario 2 is an advance upon scenario 1 in the following
level education in 2022 152 13 16 10 191
two ways. First, it disaggregates the numbers to be "skilled"
Skilled in 2009-10 45 24 10 64 143
sectorally for agriculture, manufacturing, non-manufacturing
Additional to be trained by 2022 (-)7 61 20 161
161 249
249
(242+7) industry, and services. Second, it also disaggregates the numbers
Total to be
be skilled
skilled 2022
2022 38 85 36 225 389 to be trained by those who should have vocational training,
ofwhich which includes those who will have post-higher secondary
VT (formal and informal) 8 51 14 43 116
level of technical education (te), on the one hand, and on the
Secondary and above 30 34 22 182 268
Total 190 98 52 235 575 other the number of those who will at least have secondary
Source: Authors' estimate based on NSS 2009-10. level of general education.
We have made two sets of estimations based on different
Table
Table10:10:
Distribution
Distribution
of 575of
Million
575 Million
and Additional
and Additional
Skilled Workers
Skilled
by Workers by
Sectors
Sectors and
and
by by
SkillSkill
Level Level
Assuming
Assuming
Share of Agriculture
Share of Agriculture and Allied Sectors assumptions
and Allied Sectors of the share of agriculture in total workforce. In
Come
ComeDownDownto 40%
to 40%
Table 9, we assume that, compared to the share of the work
Agriculture Manufacture Non Services Total
and Allied manufacture force in agriculture in 2009-10 of 53%, that share will drop to
Less than secondary 33% by 2022. In China the share of the workforce in agriculture
level education 184 10 15 6 215
in 2008 was already 38%, so the assumption that India's agri
Skilled in 2009-10 45 24 10 64 143
cultural workforce share will decline over the next 10 years to
Additional to be trained by 2022 01 52 22 142 217
Total to be skilled 2022 46 76 32 206 360 33% is not unreasonable. Note also that there has been a fall in
ofwhich
of which the numbers working in agriculture between 2005 and 2010 from
VT(formal andinformal)
informal) 10 45 13 42 111
VT (formal and 259 to 245 million. Hence, the assumption that this number
Secondary and above 36 31 19 164 250
250
will further fall to 190 million (i e, 33% of the 575 million large
Total
Total 230
230 86
86 47
47 212
212 575
total workforce in 2022) is not entirely unreasonable. Table 10
For arriving at a distribution of the workforce by sectors and by skill level the ratio of skilled
to unskilled (less than secondary education) workers is assumed to be 80:20 in industry and is different from Table 9 only to the extent that we assume a
for services it is 96:4 (since even high school general education is treated as a skill in case of
more conservative decline in the share of agriculture in the
services sector). In fact, these are very ambitious targets.
Source: Authors' estimate based on NSS 2009-10. total workforce from 53% in 2009-10 to only 40% in 2022.
108 march 30, 2013 vol XLViii no 13 13353 Economic & Political weekly
Additional
Additionaltotobebeskilled
skilledbyby2022
2022
190 million in all sectors taken together.
6 (4)— -(1) (1)
(4) — (5)- (5) 236
236 136
136 55
Thus, by the definition of "skilled
These three are not mutually exclusive or exhaustive categories, and therefore, do not add up to 580 million.
workers" elucidated at the beginning, the Source: Authors' estimate based on NSS 2009-10.
Economic & Political weekly Q323 march 30, 2013 vol xlviii no 13 109
136
ble ratios for manufacturing, non-manufacturing and services
Formal vocational training
VT forthose informally trained 55 are expected to be 60:40 (from the current situation of 4% for
General education higher secondary and beyond 100 mal vocational trained, 60% will become vocationally trained
Total 291 and 40% will be non-vocationally trained), 25:75 (from 2% for
Source: Authors' estimate based on NSS 2009-10.
mal vocationally trained), and 40:60 (from 6% formal voca
Table 13: Distribution of Workers by Sectors by 2022 tionally trained), respectively (Table 6).
Sector Share in Additional Workers Share in
Number of Workers Expected Number
ofWorkers
These are the desired ratios of formally vo
in 2009-10 Employment to Join during 2012-22 Employment
(million) in 2009-101%) (million) in 2022 (million)* in 2022 (%) cationally trained to those with no voca
Agriculture 245 53 -17 228 40 tional training in the workforce in each of
51 11 27 78 14
Manufacturing these sectors. In other words, the main chal
Non-manufacturing 48 10 40 88 15
31
lenge is to convert the current low share of
Services 116 25 60 176
100
those with vocational trained (both formal
Total
Total 460
460 100
100 110
110 570
570 100
* Workforce of 570 million isfor the age group-15-59 years (used for approximation). and informal) to a situation in which by
Source: Authors' estimate based on NSS 2009-10.
2022 the share of workers having informal
The share of agriculture in employment was 60% in 2000 training presently will have all formal vocational trained in
which fell to 53% in 2010. It is expected to fall even further to 2022. Given the skill development initiatives being undertaken
40% with more and more workers moving out of agriculture. by both the public and the private sector, over the next decade
With the new manufacturing plan and investments in infra (given the desired sector-wise ratios), it is expected that the
structure sector doubling from $500 billion in the Eleventh share of formal vocationally trained workers will rise to 25%
Five-Year Plan to approximately $1 trillion in the Twelfth Five (from 2% in 2009-10) by 2022 in the entire economy.
Year Plan alone, the industry sector (manufacturing, construc The total number of those in the workforce with formal
tion, mining, electricity and water supply) is expected to ab vocational training will then go up from 10 million in 2009-10
sorb more than 60 million additional workers over the next to 144 million by 2022. Therefore, the additional number of
decade. Also, the services sector which provided 22 million new workers to be formally vocationally trained is 134 million, the
job opportunities in the past decade (1999-2000 to 2009-10) is sectoral details of which are presented in Table 14.
expected to expand at even higher pace creating employment Table
Table
14: Workforce Formally
14:Vocationally
Workforce
Trained by Economic Sector Form
(2009-10
(2009-10
and 2022, in million) and 2022, in million)
for around 60 million workers in the sector by 2022. Accord
2009-10
2009-10 2022 2022
Additional Requirements
Additional Requirements
ingly, the share of workers in each sector in 2022 is noted in
Agriculture
Agriculture and
andallied
alliedactivities
activities 0.9 (0.4) 4.6 3.7
the last column of the Table 13.
Manufacturing 1.8 (3.8) 46.8 45.0
In 2004-05 and 2009-10, the proportion of vocationally 0.7 (1.7) 22.0 21.3
Non-manufacturing
trained (including technical education) workers in the work Services 6.1 (5.5) 70.4 64.3
force was 10% - 2% with formal vocational training, and the Total 9.5 (2.3) 143.8 134.3*
remaining with informal training. Figures in parentheses are percentage shares of workforce within each sector. The 136 million
estimate of Table 12 is for those in the labour force.
Nss data has been used to estimate the share of those cur
Source: Authors' estimate based on NSS 2009-10.
NOTES
degree in agriculture/engineering/technolo REFERENCES
1 Vocational training: A vocational training gy/medicine,
may etc; those with a diploma or cer
Chenoy, Dilip (2012): "Repositioning Skill Deve
broadly be defined as a training, which tificate
pre below graduate level again in agricul ment", Business Manager, October, pp 7-
ture/engineering/technology/medicine/crafts/
pares an individual for a specific vocation or available at: http://www.nsdcindia.org/pd
other
occupation. The essential feature of the voca subjects; and finally, a diploma or certifi
repositioning-skil-development.pdf, accessed o
cate equivalent
tional training is that it lays more emphasis on to graduation and above level 6 November 2012.
development of skill in a specific vocation in the
orsame subjects. Gol (2009): "National Skill Development Policy",
trade rather than building knowledge. 3 Labour
Mere force is the economically active part of the
Government of India, available at: http://
possession of a skill, which neither createspopulation,
op which supplies (when employed) or
www.skilldevelopment.gov.in/sites/default/
portunities for self-employment nor makes does anot supply but seeks to supply (when un
files/resource/NationalSkillDevelopmentPoli
person employable, will not be considered as labour for economic activity. Workforce
employed)
cyMar09.pdf, accessed on 6 November 2012.
consists of those who are in some kind of employ
having vocational training. Formal vocational
training: The vocational training that ment,takesi e, excludes those who are unemployed. NSS (2009-10): "Employment and Unemployment
Situation in India (66th Rounds)", National Sample
place in education and training institutions
4 Assuming gross enrolment rates for secondary
which follow a structured training programmeand higher secondary education to be 90% and
Survey, Ministry of Statistics and Plan Imple
mentation, Government of India, New Delhi.
and lead to recognised certificates, diplomas
65%, or
respectively (as stated in the Employment
degrees, will be treated as formal one. andBut
Education chapters of the Twelfth Five Mehrotra, Santosh, Ankita Gandhi, Bimal Kishore
when the vocational training neither followsYear Plan),
a it is expected that around 30 mil Sahoo and Partha Saha (2012): "Creating Em
structured programme nor the training lead lion to
people over 15+ will be continuing into ployment during the 12th Plan", Economic &
recognised certificates, diplomas or degrees,
education, and therefore, will be withdrawing Political Weekly, 12 May, Vol XLVII, No 19.
those training programmes will be treated from aslabour force. Planning Commission (2008): Toward, Faster and
non-formal vocational training. Non-formal
5 While the overall unemployment rate accord More Inclusive Growth: 11th Five-Year Plan
vocational training can be (a) hereditary; ing to Usual Principal and Subsidiary Status (New Delhi: Oxford University Press).
(b) self-learning; (c) Learning on the job; and in 2009-10 was 2%, unemployment
(UPSS) World Bank (2012): "More and Better Jobs in South
(d) other. For detail definition see NSSO 2009-10.
rate for those with higher secondary education Asia", The International Bank for Reconstruc
2 Technical education is defined (in NSS 66th level is 5%, with diploma/certificate level 10% tion and Development, The World Bank, Wash
round 2009-10) as those who have a technical and for graduates and postgraduates in 7%. ington DC.
Economic & Political weekly »avi march 30, 2013 vol xlviii no 13