Your Address

Your Street
Your Town
Your Postcode []

INSERT DATE (e.g.Tuesday August 31st, 2021)

Re: SUMMONS Case no: XXXXX, dated INSERT DATE ON SUMMONS.

Notice of Request for Clarification of Paperwork Received.

To: The Justices’ Clerk (trustee) of the INSERT NAME Magistrates Court

Sir/Madam,

The enclosed paperwork was delivered to the address at which I dwell.

It was addressed in the name MR INSERT NAME and MRS INSERT NAME.

It is my understanding from reading:

Halsbury’s Laws of England that no MAGISTRATES or COUNTY COURT
should not exist. And when someone is summoned, it is an ADMINISTRATIVE
meeting without ANY lawful existence. If this has transpired it is in breach of
the Fraud Act 2006 (see 2, 3, and 4 below) as the Judge/Magistrate, Clerk and
Prosecutor step outside their lawful remit, and become personally liable.

It is my understanding that demanding monies by false representation is in

breach of the Fraud Act 2006, section 2.

It is my understanding that demanding monies without providing full

disclosure is in breach of The Fraud Act 2006, section 3.

It is my understanding that demanding monies without providing evidence of

authority or jurisdiction is in breach of The Fraud Act 2006, section 4.

It is my understanding that:
Halsbury’s on Administrative law 20-11: “The law is absolutely clear on
this subject. There is no authority for administrative courts in this
country and no act can be passed to legitimate them”.
It is my understanding that according to Observance of due Process of Law
1368 section 3: “None shall be put to answer without due Process of
Law....”

It is my understanding that no authority, local or otherwise, especially when

is nothing more than a for-profit D-U-N-S registered corporation, has neither
the right nor the judicial capacity to send out a summons, let alone attempt to
enforce it.

If the argument is that Common Law has no basis in administrative law

proceedings (and therefore is irrelevant), it should be noted that
administrative law has not been sanctioned by Parliament.

CASE LAW:

THE DECLARATION OF RIGHTS OF 1688 ACTIONABLE ACTIONS OF A

HUMAN BEING OR CORPORATE PERSONA CASE LAW OF – R v Donovan
[1934] 2 KB 498 at 507, [1934] all ER Rep 207 at 210.
In delivering the judgment of the Court of Criminal Appeal Swift J, said: - “If an
act is unlawful in the sense of being in itself a criminal act, it is plain that it
cannot be rendered lawful because the person to whose detriment it is done
consents to it. No person can license another to commit a crime.”

In other words, no authority such as court clerk can licence a local authority to
break the law by issuing summons without a case file and due-process and
thus creates misrepresentation, malfeasance and breaches the principles of
public office.

One only has to ask; under what Parliamentary authority do you have as
a corporation to issue a summons?

Where is the full and completed case file?

Reminder of the CPR part 31:
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/part31

I have been led to believe this signifies that the paperwork was addressed to
the legal fiction known as a PERSON, which is, in point of fact, the name of a
CORPORATION.

I would be most grateful if you would kindly confirm or deny my

understanding in this respect.
As a Living Woman/Man, (beneficiary) with a living soul, and consequently
(as I understand it) under Common Law jurisdiction (i.e. the law-of-the-land,
as opposed to Corporate or Statute Law, namely the law-of-the-sea), I am not
entirely sure why I have received this paperwork, and would be grateful for
any clarification in this matter. I have no wish to dishonour any valid and
lawful obligation on my part.

I have also been in contact with the Council Tax Manager INSERT NAME
(public servant) for the INSERT NAME District Council, where I've sent him
a sworn Affidavit under penalty of perjury to be rebutted. That affidavit is
now in default.

According to Dun & Bradstreet there is a registered company known as

INSERT NAME District Council, ADD ADDRESS AND POSTCODE, D-U-N-S
Number “XXXXXXXXX”. Since it is possible to obtain a D&B Credit Report
on the said company, it seems reasonable to assume that it is in business,
actively trading for profit, and offering services. If this is not the case, and
INSERT NAME District Council is not a trading for profit business, please
deny that our observation is factual, for the record and under penalty of
perjury, in your next communication with us. Further, please confirm and
clarify all my understandings mentioned above point for point, within the
next fourteen (14) days.

Sincerely and without ill will, vexation or frivolity,

:xxxxx: of the xxxxx family

Without any admission of any liability whatsoever, and with all Natural, Inalienable, Rights
reserved.

Please address all future correspondence in the matter to a direct Human Self, namely :xxxxx:
of the xxxxx family, as commonly called.

Encl: Photo of Original paperwork as received, and Affidavit sent to COUNCIL BOD.