You are on page 1of 49

13 May 2015

Europe/United Kingdom
Equity Research
Specialty Chemicals

Victrex (VCTX.L)
Rating OUTPERFORM*
Price (11 May 15, p) 1,994.00 INITIATION
Target price (p) 2,400.00¹
Market cap. (£ m)
Enterprise value (£ m)
1,703.33
1,651.2
PEEK not Peaking yet
*Stock ratings are relative to the coverage universe in each
analyst's or each team's respective sector.
We initiate coverage on Victrex with an Outperform rating and a target
¹Target price is for 12 months. price of £24. Victrex has a strong pipeline of growth opportunities and
Research Analysts
significant barriers to entry, in our view. We believe the risk of product
Mathew Waugh
substitution is low and that Victrex can maintain market leadership over the
44 20 7888 0194 foreseeable competitive period. We forecast average 2015-2018E CAGR of 7%
mathew.waugh@credit-suisse.com sales, 41% EBIT margins and 35% ROCE. We believe this is not fully reflected
Chris Counihan in the current share price.
44 20 7883 7618
chris.counihan@credit-suisse.com ■ Competition growing, but market growing faster: Victrex is a one-product
Joseph Bradley business (PEEK plastic) in which competition has been accelerating since
44 20 7883 1875 2006. However, during this period, pricing has increased and we believe that
joseph.bradley@credit-suisse.com
the entry of new players has encouraged novel markets/applications and
Specialist Sales: James Brady
44 20 7888 4267
increased acceptance with customers (lower supply risk). We estimate the
james.brady@credit-suisse.com expansion of existing markets alone creates the opportunity to more than
triple annual PEEK demand by 2025E (c.12% CAGR market growth).
■ Victrex moat remains wide: We believe Victrex can sustain its No.1
position in the market due to its leading capacity expansions, balance sheet
strength and first mover advantage in semi/finished products. We think the
threat of product substitution is low.
■ Downside risk overdone: We acknowledge temporary headwinds from O&G
markets and FX (-£6m and -£7.5m in 2015E, respectively) and risks associated
with a single product line. However, we highlight that EV/tonne capacity has
declined by >20% since 2011. We believe the market is overly discounting
competitor risk given our view on the sustainability of the business model.
■ Catalyst and valuation: 19 May – H1 results (revenue already announced)
CSe £53m PBT. We derive a target price of £24 using the average of our
SOTP £22.53 and DCF £25.15.
Share price performance Financial and valuation metrics
Year 09/14A 09/15E 09/16E 09/17E
2059 Revenue (£ m) 252.6 254.7 271.8 294.5
1859 EBITDA (£ m) 112.20 117.31 125.43 137.68
1659
Pre-tax Profit Adjusted (£ m) 102.70 105.81 111.93 123.33
CS adj. EPS (p) 94.28 96.58 101.57 111.27
1459
May-13 Sep-13 Jan-14 May-14 Sep-14 Jan-15 ROIC (%) 30.25 27.12 26.75 27.91
Price Price relative P/E (adj., x) 21.15 20.65 19.63 17.92
P/E rel. (%) 140.6 124.6 135.0 138.6
The price relative chart measures performance against the
EV/EBITDA 14.4 14.1 13.2 12.1
FTSE 100 IDX which closed at 6914.08 on 11/05/15
On 11/05/15 the spot exchange rate was £.72/Eu 1. - Dividend (09/15E, p) 88.29 IC (09/15E, £ m) 302.90
Eu .89/US$1 Dividend yield (%) 4.4 EV/IC 5.5
Performance Over 1M 3M 12M Net debt (09/15E, £ m) -52.1 Current WACC 7.70
Absolute (%) -3.0 -2.2 9.4 Net debt/equity (09/15E, %) -14.7 Free float (%) 94.06
Relative (%) -0.5 -3.6 8.4 BV/share (09/15E, £) 4.2 Number of shares (m) 85.42
Source: FTI, Company data, Thomson Reuters, Credit Suisse Securities (EUROPE) LTD. Estimates.

DISCLOSURE APPENDIX AT THE BACK OF THIS REPORT CONTAINS IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES, ANALYST
CERTIFICATIONS, AND THE STATUS OF NON-US ANALYSTS. US Disclosure: Credit Suisse does and seeks to do
business with companies covered in its research reports. As a result, investors should be aware that the Firm may have a
conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Investors should consider this report as only a single factor in
making their investment decision.

CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES RESEARCH & ANALYTICS BEYOND INFORMATION®


Client-Driven Solutions, Insights, and Access
13 May 2015

Victrex VCTX.L
Price (11 May 15): 1,994.00p, Rating: OUTPERFORM, Target Price: 2,400.00p
Income statement (£ m) 09/14A 09/15E 09/16E 09/17E Per share data 09/14A 09/15E 09/16E 09/17E
Revenue (£ m) 253 255 272 294 No. of shares (wtd avg) 85 85 86 86
EBITDA 112 117 125 138 CS adj. EPS (p) 94.28 96.58 101.57 111.27
Depr. & amort. (10) (12) (14) (15) Prev. EPS (p) — — — —
EBIT (£) 102 105 111 123 Dividend (p) 95.15 88.29 90.79 95.63
Net interest exp. 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Div yield 4.77 4.43 4.55 4.80
Associates — — — — Dividend payout ratio 100.92 91.42 89.38 85.95
Other adj, — — — — Free cash flow per share 61.95 77.48 104.06 120.78
PBT (£) 103 106 112 123 (p)
Income taxes (22) (23) (25) (27) Key ratios and 09/14A 09/15E 09/16E 09/17E
Profit after tax 80 83 87 96 valuation
Minorities — — — — Growth (%)
Preferred dividends — — — — Sales 13.8 0.8 6.7 8.3
Associates & other — — — — EBIT 8.7 3.0 5.8 10.2
Net profit 80 83 87 96 Net profit 10.0 2.9 5.8 10.2
Other NPAT adjustments — — — — EPS 9.6 2.4 5.2 9.5
Reported net income 80 83 87 96 Margins (%)
EBITDA margin 44.4 46.1 46.1 46.8
Cash flow (£) 09/14A 09/15E 09/16E 09/17E EBIT margin 40.5 41.4 41.0 41.7
EBIT 102 105 111 123 Pretax margin 40.7 41.5 41.2 41.9
Net interest 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Net margin 31.7 32.4 32.1 32.7
Cash taxes paid — — — — Valuation metrics (x)
Change in working capital (5) — — — EV/sales 6.4 6.5 6.1 5.6
Other cash & non-cash items 21 2 10 9 EV/EBITDA 14.4 14.1 13.2 12.1
Cash flow from operations 118 108 121 132 EV/EBIT 15.8 15.7 14.9 13.5
CAPEX (66) (42) (32) (28) P/E 21.1 20.6 19.6 17.9
Free cashflow adj. — — — — P/B 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.5
Free cash flow to the firm 98 88 101 112 Asset turnover 0.61 0.61 0.63 0.65
Acquisitions — — — — ROE analysis (%)
Divestments — — — — ROE stated-return on 24.0 23.3 24.2 25.6
Other investment/(outflows) — — — — ROIC
equity 30.3 27.1 26.8 27.9
Cash flow from investments (66) (42) (32) (28) Interest burden 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
Net share issue/(repurchase) 3 — — — Tax rate 21.9 22.0 22.0 22.0
Dividends paid (37) (81) (75) (78) Financial leverage — — — —
Issuance (retirement) of debt — — — — Credit ratios (%)
Other (21) (23) (24) (27) Net debt/equity (25.4) (14.7) (11.4) (10.8)
Cash flow from financing (55) (104) (100) (105) Net debt/EBITDA (0.80) (0.44) (0.33) (0.30)
Effect of exchange rates
activities — — — — Interest coverage ratio (204.4) (210.6) (222.9) (245.7)
Changes in Net Cash/Debt (2) (38) (10) (0)
.
Net debt at start (92) (90) (52) (42) Source: FTI, Company data, Thomson Reuters, Credit Suisse Securities
Change in net debt 2 38 10 0 (EUROPE) LTD. Estimates.
Net debt at end (90) (52) (42) (42)

Balance sheet (£ m) 09/14A 09/15E 09/16E 09/17E


Assets
Cash and cash equivalents 90 52 42 42 2059
Accounts receivable 33 32 34 37
Inventory 44 56 60 65 1859
Other current assets 5 5 5 5
Total current assets 172 145 140 148 1659
Total fixed assets 228 258 276 289 1459
Intangible assets and goodwill 10 10 10 10
May-13 Sep-13 Jan-14 May-14 Sep-14 Jan-15
Investment securities — — — —
Other assets 7 7 7 7 Price Price relative
Total assets 416 419 433 454
Liabilities The price relative chart measures performance against the FTSE 100 IDX which
Accounts payable 27 29 31 33 closed at 6914.08 on 11/05/15
Short-term debt — — — — On 11/05/15 the spot exchange rate was £.72/Eu 1. - Eu .89/US$1
Other short term liabilities 10 10 10 10
Total current liabilities 37 39 41 43
Long-term debt — — — —
Other liabilities 26 26 26 26
Total liabilities 63 64 66 69
Shareholders' equity 353 355 367 385
Minority interest — — — —
Total equity & liabilities 416 419 433 454
Net debt (£ m) (90) (52) (42) (42)

Victrex (VCTX.L) 2
13 May 2015

Key charts
Figure 1: PEEK pricing positive despite new entrants… Figure 2: …we think performance warrants price holding...
130 140
Pricing has remained positive despite new entrants
120 PEEK
120
Victrex Average PEEK Price

110
Evonik enter market 100
100 China enter market

Market Price ($/kg)


Tungsten Carbide
90 PPS
80
Solvay enter market
80 PAI
60
70 Titanium
60 40 PES
PVDF
50 PSU
20 PA 12
PP PI
40 HDPE POM
0 PVC ABS
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Price (USD/kg) Price (GBP/kg) Price (EUR/kg)
Strength-to-weight ratio
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse research Source: Makeitfrom.com, Alibaba.com, Credit Suisse estimates

Figure 3: …even as further production capacity ramps... Figure 4: …Victrex should sustain No1. market position…
90% 70% 15
80% Victrex
Downstream Integration of PEEK 13
70%
65% 11
60%
9
50%
Solvay
60% 7
40%
5
30% Jilin
55% 3 Evonik
20%
Panjin
10% 1

0% 50% -1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12

-3
Engineering Plastic Product/Composite Offering
Utilisation Rate (LHS) Victrex Gross Margin (LHS)

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Credit Suisse estimates, company data (Jilin and Panjin)

Figure 5: … and improve ROCE with utilisation rate… Figure 6: …however, the market is discounting future
production
0 Recent heavy capex into new facilities and flat volumes 40 0.30
Market pricing-in a discount on future capacity
0 have depressed ROCE... 35
0.25
0 30
0 0.20
25
0
20 0.15
0
15
0 0.10
0 10

0 ...but this should improve as Capex spend 5 0.05


comes down
0 0
0.00

ROCE Production to PPE EV/Capacity 2 Yr FWD

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates Source: Company data, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL™
service

Victrex (VCTX.L) 3
13 May 2015

Table of contents
Investment overview 5
Bull & Bear 6
Investment thesis 7
Credit Suisse vs. market & earnings bridge 10
Earnings sensitivities 12
Valuation 13
Credit Suisse HOLT® 18
Quantifying the business lifecycle 19
Underlying trends in Victrex / PEEK 20
Competitive position of PEEK 23
Competitive position of Victrex 26
Corporate longevity 29
Balance sheet and cash 33
Acquisition environment 34
Group overview 35
VPS division (79% sales, 71% EBIT) 37
Invibio division (21% sales, 29% EBIT) 38
Profit & loss forecasts 39
Balance sheet forecasts 40
Cash flow forecasts 42
Appendix 43
Management 43
Shareholder structure 43
Properties of ultra-high performance plastics 44
Credit Suisse PEERs 45

Victrex (VCTX.L) 4
Victrex (VCTX.L)

Investment overview
Figure 7: Investment overview

Victrex
OUTPERFORM
TP £24/share

- Sustainable product and company barriers to entry


- Strong pipeline of opportunities
- CS forecast 10-15 yr sustained competitive position

- Returns warrant >50% premium to peers - Market could >triple over next ten years
- Currently trading at PE discount to range vs peers - Transport/electronics increased penetration
- Future production capacity priced at a discount - Medical market further opportunity

SOTP £23/share Strong pipeline of


DCF £25/share opportunity
Sustainable barriers to entry

- PEEK to remain best in class


- Victrex to retain No. 1 market position

Resilient pricing despite


PEEK barrier to entry Victrex Barrier to entry
competitor additions
- Pricing increases despite increasing competition - Superior strength-to-weight performance - High end technology
- Competition accelerating market not destroying pricing - Competitive price point - Largest capacity & established customer base
- Further opportunity to improve cost position - Easy processing - Semi-finished offereing

Source: Credit Suisse research

13 May 2015
5
Victrex (VCTX.L)

Bull & Bear


Figure 8: Bull & Bear assumptions based on Credit Suisse base case, bear case and bull case
Victrex - 2015 Bull/Bear

Key Drivers Bear Case Credit Suisse base Case Bull Case

Contribution to
Contribution to Contribution to group
View group EBITDA View View
group EBITDA growth EBITDA growth
growth

Oil & Gas market impact -8.0% Market down 45% -5.3% Market down 30% -3% Market down 15%

New Facility Operating Costs -1.8% High end guidance -0.9% Mid Guidance -0.4% Low end guidance

Penetration of electronics run Penetration of electronics run Penetration of electronics run


Above Market Growth 10.0% 15.0% 22.5%
rate decelerates rate continues rate accelerates

Real Pricing -4.0% Down 2% 0.0% Flat 4.0% Up 2%

FX Impact -7.1% High end guidance -6.7% Mid Guidance -6.2% Low end guidance

Other/Organic 0.0% No underlying growth 2.5% Market Growth 10.0% Bullish organic

Bear case EBITDA growth Credit Suisse base case EBITDA Bull case EBITDA growth
Total EBIT growth -10.9% 4.6% 27.1%
2014/15 growth 2014/15 2014/15

2015 EBITDA (mn) £100 £117 £143

Source: Credit Suisse estimates

13 May 2015
6
13 May 2015

Investment thesis
We initiate coverage on Victrex with an Outperform rating and a £24 target price.
Victrex has a strong pipeline of growth opportunities and significant barriers to entry, in our
view. We believe the risk of product substitution is low and that Victrex can maintain
market leadership over the foreseeable competitive period. We forecast average 2015-
18E CAGR of 7% sales, 41% EBIT margins and 35% ROCE. We also believe Victrex can
sustain above average returns over the next 10-15 years. We believe this sustainable
competitive position is not fully reflected in the current share price.

Competition growing, but market growing faster


Victrex is a one-product business (PEEK plastic) that has operated as the sole global
producer between 1980-2005. Since 2006, competitors have entered the market; however,
we note that during this period pricing/gross margin has actually increased. Furthermore,
we estimate that the entry of new players has encouraged novel markets/applications and
increased acceptance with customers (lower supply risk). We estimate expansion of
existing markets alone creates the opportunity to more than triple annual demand by
2025E.

Figure 9: Estimated supply/demand analysis for PEEK


PEEK Capacity (RHS) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E
Victrex 2,300 2,300 2,500 2,800 2,800 2,800 3,525 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 5,983 7,150 7,150 7,150
Solvay 120 150 188 234 293 366 458 572 850 900 1,400 2,500 2,500
Evonik (Jida) 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
Panjin Zhongrun 100 300 500 700 900 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Jilin Zhongyan 0 0 300 600 700 700 900 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Gharda 120 120 120 120
Kingfa 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
Total 2,420 2,420 2,620 3,420 3,420 3,450 4,213 5,584 6,143 6,516 6,808 7,322 7,800 9,583 11,250 12,350 12,350
8% 31% 0% 1% 22% 33% 10% 6% 4% 8% 7% 23% 17% 10% 0%

PEEK 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E
Victrex 1,205 1,481 1,802 1,972 2,339 2,508 2,626 1,547 2,535 2,860 2,904 2,920 3,551 3,958 4,219 4,591 4,987
Solvay 80 100 140 196 274 384 538 753 850 948 1,010 1,099 1,194
Evonik 50 63 78 98 122 153 191 238 300 334 356 388 421
Panjin Zhang 40 120 200 280 360 400 446 475 517 562
Jilin 120 300 350 350 450 500 557 594 646 702
Gharda 50 50 50 50
Kingfa 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Total 1,255 1,531 1,852 2,022 2,469 2,671 2,844 2,101 3,451 4,047 4,363 4,821 5,701 6,344 6,754 7,341 7,966
Growth 22% 21% 9% 22% 8% 7% -26% 64% 17% 8% 11% 18% 11% 6% 9% 9%

Utilisation Rate (LHS) 63% 71% 59% 72% 77% 68% 38% 56% 62% 64% 66% 73% 66% 60% 59% 65%
Victrex Gross Margin (LHS) 55% 55% 55% 57% 62% 64% 65% 62% 64% 68% 66% 67% 65% 64% 64% 64% 64%
Victrex EBIT Margin 32% 32% 34% 37% 39% 39% 24% 40% 43% 43% 42% 40% 41% 41% 42% 42%
Source: Company data (company websites), Credit Suisse estimates for Victrex, Solvay and Evonik

Victrex moat remains wide


Product substitution risk low
Victrex's sole product is PEEK (Polyethyletherketone) which is classed as an ultra-high
performance polymer due to its high strength, low weight plus good temperature and
chemical resistance. The material was developed in 1978 by ICI, and Victrex was later
spun out through management buyout. Victrex has developed a global market for PEEK
over the past 30 years. The product is now used in a multitude of applications.
We estimate the threat of product substitution is low based on an analysis of PEEK
performance/price vs. competitor products. PEEK outperforms the competition on
strength-to-weight characteristics and in our view will continue to justify its high price
premium (>$100/kg)

Victrex (VCTX.L) 7
13 May 2015

Market position sustainable


Victrex occupies the No. 1 position in PEEK and we believe this is sustainable in the mid-
to-long term. We believe the following barriers to entry support this: (1) Largest nameplate
capacity and recently expanded production capabilities, (2) strong balance sheet (low risk
supply for customers), (3) best-in-class technical ability and (4) first mover advantage in
semi-finished/medical products.

Figure 10: Performance (strength-to-weight) versus price


140
PEEK
120

100
Market Price ($/kg)

Tungsten Carbide
PPS
80
PAI
60
Titanium
40 PES
PVDF
PSU
20 PA 12
PP PI
HDPE POM
0 PVC ABS
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Strength-to-weight ratio
Source: Makeitfrom.com, Alibaba.com, Credit Suisse estimates

Downside risk overdone


We acknowledge temporary headwinds from O&G markets (17% group) and FX (-£6m
and -£7.5m in 2015E, respectively) and risks associated with a single product line.
However, we believe the market is more than discounting this risk given our view on the
sustainability of the business model.
We note that EV/tonne capacity has declined by >20% since 2011. We believe the market
is unduly discounting the value of future production capacity due to concerns over
increasing oversupply in the global markets. We believe the additional capacity will not
affect pricing and will serve to further expand market opportunities. This is given the
specialty nature of the product and the large potential market opportunities.

Figure 11: Oil & gas exposure and estimated revenue impact in 2015
Exposure Sales exposure % Exposure of 2015 growth 2015 revenue
(£mn) group impact (£mn)
Oil & Gas 43 17% -31% -13
of which Exploration 28 11% -31% -9
of which Machinery 14 6% -31% -5
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 8
13 May 2015

Valuation: Our £24 target price is derived using the average of our SOTP of £22.53 and
DCF of £25.15.

Figure 12: Target price valuation


GBp
SOTP 2,253
DCF 2,515
Average 2,400
Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Catalyst timeline
Figure 13 and Figure 14 highlight our catalyst timeline and valuation sensitivities for
Victrex:

■ We believe the interim results and FY results should act as positive catalysts for the
stock given our positive view on markets and gross margin progression.

■ We estimate the probability-weighted valuation range is skewed to the upside. Our


target price is 20% above the current share price.
Downside risk to our target price in the short term would result from greater-than-expected
pressure from oil and gas markets (low end of consensus). In the longer term, the
downside risk comes from the extent to which the market could price in premium returns
and growth (competitive period)—we assume 12.5 years—a 5-year competitive period
would reduce the valuation to £15/share.
Upside risk to our target price in the short term would likely result from better-than-
expected volumes in the Invibio business (we forecast flat FY). In the longer term, upside
risk could come from an extension of the competitive period for Victrex—we assume 10
years before returns fade—a 15- to 20-year competitive period would increase the
valuation to £30/share.

Figure 13: Valuation sensitivities on an range of measures


Valuation sensitivity (p)
5-year competitive period only 1,500
Low end consensus on CS multiple 1,934
Credit Suisse 2,400
High end consensus on CS multiple 2,761
15- to 20-year competitive period 3,000
Source: Credit Suisse estimates, IBES consensus

Figure 14: Catalyst timeline


Catalyst Timeline
Event Date

H1 2015 Interim Results 19/05/2015


BoE rate rise Q3 2015?
FY Results (Special Dividend?) Dec-15
Victrex New Capacity 2015
Solvay De-bottleneck 2015
Solvay/Victrex new capacity 2015/16
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 9
13 May 2015

Credit Suisse vs. market & earnings


bridge
Figure 15 highlights that our EBITDA forecasts are slightly below consensus. We forecast:

■ Average 9% growth per annum in volumes. This is 5% ahead of underlying market


assumptions. We note Victrex has historically outperformed underlying markets by
7%;

■ Sustained pricing power despite additional competitor supply additions. We believe


Victrex will hold/increase margins through the forecast period. This is a function of
average selling price declines as electronics volumes increase, offset by
distribution/production efficiencies and operating leverage;

■ Successful execution on c.1/2 of the growth pipeline.

Figure 15: Victrex forecasts—Credit Suisse vs. consensus


2015 2016 2017
£m CS Consensus Difference CS Consensus Difference CS Consensus Difference
Revenue 255 266 -4% 272 287 -5% 294 308 -4%
EBITDA 117 118 -1% 125 129 -3% 138 142 -3%
Operating profit 105 105 0% 111 114 -2% 123 125 -2%
PBT 106 105 0% 112 115 -2%
Net Income 83 83 -1% 87 90 -3% 96 100 -4%
EPS (Diluted) (p) 97 97 0% 102 106 -4% 111 120 -7%
DPS (Ordinary) (p) 48 49.5 -2% 51 57 -11% 56 64 -13%
DPS (Special) (p) 40 40 40
Source: Company consensus, IBES, Credit Suisse estimates

Figure 16 to Figure 18 outline our 2014/15 earnings bridge; specifically we note:

■ Oil & gas headwind: We forecast 30% volume declines in Victrex's exploration and
machinery business lines (17% group). This equates to a £13m revenue impact and
£6m EBITDA impact in 2015E.

■ Currency: We forecast a £7.5m EBITDA headwind in 2015 due to hedging in place


from 2014. We forecast £2-3m EBITDA benefit in 2016. Every 10% move in USD/EUR
would affect EBITDA by 9% and 7%, respectively.

■ New facility operating costs: Victrex has started production at its third facility in the
UK. We estimate this adds £1m in operating costs this year and £1m next year.

■ Market volumes: We estimate weighted market volumes of -1% due to declines in oil
and gas activity. However, we forecast 12% market outperformance as Victrex
continues to secure further product penetration in consumer electronics (electronics
led).

■ Electronics penetration: We estimate additional electronics volumes of 350 tonnes


yoy at c.£24 EBITDA/kg. We estimate this should benefit EBITDA by c.£8-9mn in
2015.

■ Organic growth of c.10%: We estimate the underlying business should continue to


grow at c.10%, a function of 5% above market volumes and small gross margin
benefits (distribution/production benefits).

Victrex (VCTX.L) 10
13 May 2015

Figure 16: 2014A/15E earnings bridge (£m)


£m
2014 EBITDA 112
Drilling activity -5.9
Currency -7.5
New facility operating costs -1.0
Electronics penetration 8.4
Total non-organic EBITDA -6.0

2015E EBITDA 117

Organic EBITDA 11

Organic growth 9.9%


Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Figure 17: 2015E volume estimates (tonnes)—We assume volumes 12% above market
growth led by electronics product penetration
Tonnes production Market growth estimate
2014 3,551

Underlying market impacts


Drilling -188 -31%
Industrial 42 3%
Transport 48 5%
Electronics 41 4%
Medical 29 8%
Total weighted market impact -28 -1%

2015E volume 3,958 11%

Implied growth above market 436 12%


Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Figure 18: Oil & gas exposure and estimated revenue impact in 2015E
Exposure Sales exposure % Exposure of 2015E growth 2015E revenue
(£m) group impact (£m)
Oil & Gas 43 17% -31% -13
of which Exploration 28 11% -31% -9
of which Machinery 14 6% -31% -5
Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 11
13 May 2015

Earnings sensitivities
Figure 19 highlights the key earnings drivers for Victrex; specifically, we highlight:
Market volumes: Victrex volumes remain most sensitive to underlying market volumes in
Electronics (portable devices and semi-conductor equipment), Automotive (premium bias),
Oil field (mechanical parts), Industrial (mechanical parts) and Medical (spine).
Real pricing: We estimate every 2% change in real pricing (beyond raw material pass
through) affects EBITDA by 4%.
Currency: The dominant currency drivers are USD, EUR and JPY. We note that Victrex
hedges 90-100% of projected transactions six months forward and 75-100% for the
subsequent six months.

Figure 19: Credit Suisse estimated sensitivities for Victrex


Sensitivities Change EBITDA impact
Market volumes
Industrial +10% 2.0%
Automotive +10% 3.2%
Oilfield +10% 2.0%
Electronics +10% 3.2%
Medical +10% 0.6%

Real pricing
VPS +2% 3.0%
Invibio +2% 0.9%

Currency (excluding hedging)


USD vs. GBP +10% 9.0%
EUR vs. GBP +10% 7.0%
JPY vs. GBP +10% 1.3%
Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 12
13 May 2015

Valuation
Our target price of £24 is the average of our SOTP and DCF valuation methods.

Figure 20: Target price valuation


GBp
SOTP 2,253
DCF 2,515
Average 2,400
Source: Credit Suisse estimates

SOTP
Our SOTP valuation is GBp2,253/share. We value group EBITDA on 15.7x 2015E and
14.7x 2016E. This represents a 50% premium to peers Evonik, Solvay and Croda. We
calculate the warranted premium based on relative ROIC, CFROI® and growth metrics. We
value VPS at a 65% premium to peers and Invibio at a 35% premium to peers—this is
given the greater risk/lower visibility in Invibio (regulatory approvals, qualification and
market acceptance risk).

Figure 21: SOTP valuation


(£m) EBITDA 2015E Multiple EBITDA 2016E Multiple EV
Victrex Polymer Solutions - VPS 91 16.2 95 15.6 1,474
Invibio 31 13.2 35 12.7 430
Other - Unallocated costs -5 15.4 -5 14.8 -70
Group 117 15.6 125 14.6 1,834
Net Debt (Cash) (FY14A) 90
Minorities (FY14A) 0
Pensions (FY14A) -8
Market Value 1,916
no of shares 85.1
GBp/share 2,253
Source: Credit Suisse estimates

We attribute a 50% premium to key peers.

Figure 22: Peers multiples


EV/EBITDA
Peers 2015E 2016E

Evonik 8.1 8.3


Solvay 8.0 7.6
Croda 13.4 12.4
Average 9.8 9.4
Source: Credit Suisse estimates

We estimate the warranted premium for Victrex is 50% vs. key peers, and see this as a
function of:

■ 70% ROIC premium,

■ 70% CFROI premium to peers' average,

■ 10% growth premium, and

■ Greater total dividend/FCF yield.

Victrex (VCTX.L) 13
13 May 2015

Figure 23: Warranted premium for Victrex multiple


2015E EV/EBITDA ROIC CFROI 2 year EBITDA Growth Dividend Yield FCFE Yield
Evonik 8.1 11% 4% 7% 3.6% -1.5%
Solvay 8.0 11% 6% 6% 2.6% 3.7%
Croda 13.4 25% 17% 8% 2.4% 0.0%
Average 9.8 16% 9% 7% 2.9% 0.7%

Victrex 27% 15% 8% 4.3% 2.5%

Premium/Discount 73% 67% 10% 52% 229%


Average Premium/Discount 50% 50% 50% 50% 50% 50%

Implied Multiple 14.8


Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 14
13 May 2015

DCF
Figure 24 highlights our DCF valuation for Victrex of GBp2,515/share. This is premised
upon:

■ Beta of 1.2x, equity risk premium of 5.5%, target gearing of 27% (longer-term
financing assumption) and WACC of 7.7%.

■ Mid-term growth of 10% and an EBIT margin of 40% (2014A 40.5%) over a 12.5-year
sustainable competitive advantage period. Our analysis of the pipeline of opportunities
and competitive position of the product and the company suggest this is warranted.

■ Long-term growth of 2.5% (GDP) and 20% operating margin. This represents the
longer-term outlook for a specialty chemicals company.

■ Net debt, pension liability and minority interests of £82mn cash positive.

Figure 24: DCF valuation (£m)


DCF
Derived EV 2,058
MV debt (+ve cash) (2014A) 81.8
Derived market cap (£m) 2,140

No of shares (m) 85.1

Derived Value per share (GBp) 2,515


Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Figure 25: DCF Valuation for Victrex (£m) – All forecast years
Middle Terminal
Period Period
(First cashflow) cashflow
Forecast Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2032

Turnover 254.7 271.8 294.5 315.9 347.5 1,066.0


Operating profit (EBIT) 105.3 111.4 122.8 132.6 139.0 213.2
Margin 41.4% 41.0% 41.7% 42.0% 40.0% 20.0%
Add back Depreciation 12.0 14.0 14.8 15.4 17.0 52.0
EBITDA (post except) 117.3 125.4 137.7 148.1 156.0 265.2
Taxation (23.3) (24.6) (27.1) (29.3) (27.8) (42.6)
Less increase/add decrease in Working Capital 9.1 4.0 5.3 5.0 (7.9) (5.2)
Acquisitions / Disposals - - - -
Less Capex (42.0) (32.0) (28.0) (28.0) (25.5) (52.0)
Free Cashflow for the Firm (FCFF) 61.1 72.8 87.8 95.8 94.8 165.4

Discount rate (WACC) (%) 7.7


Annual discount factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 n/a n/a
Cumulative factor for period 0.93 0.86 0.80 0.74 13.15 19.2
Discount factor to start of first forecast period 0.69 0.29
Total discount factor 0.93 0.86 0.80 0.74 9.07 5.66

Discounted value (£m) 57 63 70 71 861 936


Derived EV (£m) 2,058
Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 15
13 May 2015

Relative valuation
Victrex is trading on 13.8x 12m fwd EV/EBITDA on IBES estimates (ex. pensions). This
represents a 51% premium vs. peers – in line with 1-2 year average.

Figure 26: 12m fwd EV/EBITDA (IBES)


Victrex Solvay Evonik Croda Peers average Victrex vs. peers
International
VCTX.L SOLB.BR EVKn.DE CRDA.L
Current 13.8 7.2 7.1 13.0 9.1 51%
12-month average 12.9 6.9 7.0 11.5 8.5 52%
2-year average 12.4 6.8 6.7 11.2 8.2 51%
4-year average 11.0 6.3 6.7 10.6 8.1 36%
Source: 12m fwd EV/EBITDA (IBES) – ex. pensions

Victrex is trading on 19.9x 12m fwd P/E on IBES estimates (ex. pensions). This represents
a 13% premium vs. peers and is a 5% discount to the two-year average premium (18%).

Figure 27: 12m fwd P/E (IBES)


Victrex Solvay Evonik Croda Peers Euro STOXX Victrex Victrex
International average 600 relative to relative to
peers market
VCTX.L SOLB.BR EVKn.DE CRDA.L .STOXX
Current 19.9 16.0 15.8 20.9 17.5 16.5 13% 20%
12-month average 18.6 15.0 15.0 18.3 16.1 14.7 15% 27%
2-year average 18.3 14.4 14.3 17.9 15.5 14.0 18% 31%
4-year average 16.8 13.2 14.3 17.0 14.8 12.2 14% 38%
Source: 12m fwd P/E (IBES)

Figure 28: P/E relative to peers Figure 29: EV/EBITDA relative to peers
180
140
135 170
130
EV/EBITDA Relative

125 160
120 150
PER

115
110 140
105
100 130
95 120
90
110

Victrex vs Peers Average Victrex vs Peers Average

Source: 12m fwd P/E (IBES) Source: 12m fwd EV/EBITDA (IBES) – ex. pensions

Victrex (VCTX.L) 16
13 May 2015

Figure 30: Victrex EV/EBITDA ex. pensions (12m fwd) Figure 31: Victrex P/E (12m fwd)

15.0 22.0
14.5
14.0 20.0
13.5
13.0 18.0
EV/EBITDA

PE
12.5
12.0 16.0
11.5
11.0 14.0
10.5
10.0 12.0

10.0
Victrex Average

Source: 12m fwd EV/EBITDA (IBES) – ex. pensions Source: 12m fwd P/E (IBES)

Figure 32 highlights the annual average enterprise value over the current year and two-
year forward capacity for Victrex. We highlight a period of re-rating coming out of 2008/09
in which EV per tonne capacity increased from £100k to £250k. However, we believe the
market is yet to value the oncoming capacity fully given the declines to EV/tonne on a two-
year forward basis.

Figure 32: EV/capacity (two-year forward £m/tonne/annum)


0.30
Market pricing-in a discount on future capacity

0.25

0.20

0.15

0.10

0.05

0.00

EV/Capacity 2 Yr FWD

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse research

Victrex (VCTX.L) 17
13 May 2015

Credit Suisse HOLT®


HOLT has a warranted price of £24.84/share based on Credit Suisse explicit estimates to
2025 and standard HOLT fade thereafter (2.5% asset growth and 6% CFROI®). Our
forecasts imply a sustainable competitive position to 2015 with c.20% CFROI, 45% margin
and 0.5x asset turns. We believe this extended period of high returns is justified based on
our analysis of product, market and company barriers to entry.

Figure 33: HOLT warranted price £25/share

VICTREX PLC (VCTX)


Current Price: GBP 20.38 Warranted Price: GBP 24.84 Valuation date: 08-May-15
Sales Growth (parallel % point change to forecasts) Sep 13A Sep 14A Sep 15E Sep 16E Sep 17E
GBP -2.0% -1.0% 0.0% 1.0% 2.0% Sales Growth, % 1.0 13.8 2.1 8.5 10.8
EBITDA Margin (parallel % point change

EBITDA Mgn, % 46.8 44.9 46.0 46.9 48.6


-2.0% -5% 5% 15% 27% 40%
Asset Turns, x 0.46 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

-1.0% -2% 8% 18% 30% 44%


CFROI®, % 16.8 16.7 17.1 18.3 19.9
to forecasts)

Disc Rate, % 4.2 4.4 3.9 3.9 3.9


0.0% 1% 11% 22% 34% 48%
Asset Grth, % 9.9 8.3 0.6 3.1 4.1

1.0% 4% 14% 25% 38% 52%


Value/Cost, x 4.3 4.5 4.4 4.3 4.0

Economic PE, x 25.3 27.1 25.8 23.2 20.2


2.0% 7% 17% 29% 42% 56%
Leverage, % 1.0 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
HOLT - Credit Suisse Analyst Scenario Data

More than
More than
Sales Growth (%)
10% Within 10% 90
10% upside
downside 80
70
60
CFROI & Discount Rate (in %) 50
40
25
30
20
20 10
0
15 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024

10
EBITDA Margin
60
5
50

0 40
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
Historical CFROI Historical Transaction CFROI 30
Forecast CFROI Forecast CFROI
CFROI Discount Rate 20

10
Asset Growth (in %)
0
16 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024
14
12
Asset Turns (x)
10 0.7
8 0.6
6 0.5
4
0.4
2
0.3
0
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 0.2

0.1
Historical Asset Growth Rate Forecast Growth Forecast Growth RAGR
0.0
2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024

Source: Credit Suisse HOLT®. CFROI and HOLTare trademarks or registered trademarks of Credit Suisse Group AG or its affiliates in the United States and other countries.

Source: Credit Suisse HOLT ®, Credit Suisse estimates, company data

Victrex (VCTX.L) 18
13 May 2015

Quantifying the business lifecycle


We believe the key question to understanding the future value creation/destruction for
Victrex shareholders is to form an understanding of where the company sits in the
business lifecycle.
During the 1990s, Victrex established a market for PEEK, growing the business through
the early 2000s as the sole global producer. Between 2005–2009 a number of competitors
(Evonik, Solvay, Jilin, Panjin) entered the market and have rapidly expanded capacity.
Understanding where we are in the business cycle is key, namely:

■ Whether we are now entering an expansionary juncture in which Victrex (and peers)
can increase the market with greater product penetration and new applications, or

■ Whether the increased production capabilities and competition in PEEK lead to a


maturation of the market and compete away excess economic returns.
In summary, we believe that Victrex can continue to sustain above market growth and
pricing, PEEK will retain its premium value and that Victrex can sustain a leading market
position. We forecast:

■ Sustainable growth and returns: We forecast sustainable above market volume


growth and pricing power, noting increasing Average Selling Prices (ASP) despite
increased competition since 2005. We note gross margin has remained resilient
despite the volatility of global operating rates as new capacity has come online.
Furthermore, we believe the company can leverage an improving cost position as it
fills new production capacity.

■ Sustainable product position: We believe PEEK will remain the first choice material
for high-end applications due to its superior strength-to-weight properties and
competitive price point.

■ Sustainable market position: We believe Victrex will continue to occupy the No.1
position in the market supported by capacity increases, superior technological know-
how and first mover advantage in semi-finished applications,

■ Corporate longevity: We believe Victrex can sustain premium returns beyond the
next decade due to (1) sizeable market opportunities to 2025 that can accommodate
all players (>triple market, c.12% CAGR), and (2) opportunity to move the portfolio
further downstream towards semi-finished and medical implants (Victrex has first
mover advantage).

Victrex (VCTX.L) 19
13 May 2015

Underlying trends in Victrex / PEEK


We forecast volume growth >5% above market over the next 10-15 years. We believe
ASP should continue to hold pricing power and track raw materials/inflation. We forecast
margins/returns improvement as new facilities ramp and operational efficiencies continue.

Volumes
Victrex has outpaced underlying market growth by an average of 7% over the past 10
years (Figure 34). We believe 2014 marked a return to sustained volume growth after the
slowdown in 2013 led by destocking cycles in electronics (capex downturn in
semiconductors, volatility in consumer order patterns), medical (Obama Care uncertainty
over insurance payments and customer consolidation in 2014) and transport (weak end
markets in H1). We now forecast 12% market outperformance in 2015 and an average of
5% over the next 10-15 years. This is a function of:

■ Product penetration in 2015—continued penetration of electronics—we note Victrex


increased electronics tonnage from 628 in 2013 to 1,031 in 2014 (+64%). Victrex
reported 28% group volume increases in H1 2015A. We believe this is led by
continued penetration in electronics.

■ Strong pipeline of opportunities in electronics, transport and medical (see Figure 52


to Figure 59 later in the report).

■ Further penetration of existing applications as acceptance/use of PEEK continues


to increase with existing/new customers.

Figure 34: Victrex tonnage growth vs. the underlying market


Market growth by industry 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Average
Automotive 5.3% 2.8% 3.9% 5.4% -3.8% -12.1% 24.7% 3.7% 6.4% 3.5% 3.5% 4%
Industrial 6.9% 8.7% 7.3% 3.1% 2.8% -21.3% 19.1% 9.4% 1.5% -0.8% 3.8% 4%
of which 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0%
Industrial 3.6% 2.8% 3.9% 3.7% -1.5% -11.7% 8.6% 2.6% 1.4% 1.4% 2.7% 2%
Oil & Gas 10.2% 14.7% 10.8% 2.4% 7.1% -30.9% 29.6% 16.1% 1.5% -3.0% 4.9% 6%
Electronics 2.0% 2.0% 11.3% 7.6% 3.9% 4.9% 3.6% 1.8% -3.8% 1.0% 2.3% 3%
Medical 15.3% 8.2% 9.8% 11.6% 8.2% 3.2% 3.5% 3.9% 4.1% 5.5% 4.0% 7%
Weighted underlying market growth % 6.4% 4.9% 7.8% 6.1% 2.0% -9.4% 16.1% 5.6% 1.9% 1.4% 3.4% 4%

Victrex Growth By Industry 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Average
Industrial 17% 23% 22% 16% 7% -29% 53% 11% -2% 0% 6% 11%
Transport 4% 10% 12% 6% 10% -41% 59% 10% 0% 7% 20% 9%
Electronics 65% -4% 18% -2% -3% -54% 96% 16% 11% -12% 64% 18%
Medical 0% 12% 27% 6% 4% -51% 68% 20% -1% 13% -2% 9%
Total 22% 9% 19% 7% 5% -41% 64% 13% 2% 1% 22% 11%

Victrex Growth vs Market 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Average
Industrial 10% 14% 14% 13% 4% -7% 34% 2% -3% 1% 3% 8%
Transport -1% 7% 8% 1% 14% -29% 34% 6% -6% 4% 17% 5%
Electronics 63% -6% 7% -10% -7% -59% 92% 14% 14% -13% 62% 14%
Medical -15% 4% 17% -5% -4% -54% 64% 16% -5% 8% -6% 2%
Total 15% 5% 11% 1% 3% -32% 48% 7% 0% -1% 18% 7%
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates, the BLOOMBERG PROFESSIONAL™ service, Statistica, Accenture, Baker Hughes

Victrex (VCTX.L) 20
13 May 2015

Price
Figure 35 and Figure 36 highlight the 10-year trends for Victrex's ASP and gross margins.
We note that ASP has increased by 30-70% in $, € and £ terms over the past 10 years
despite competitors Solvay, Evonik and China (Jilin and Panjin) entering the market. We
note:

■ Small ASP declines in 2014 due to mix impact from greater electronics volumes (lower
selling price due to the large order size per customer—bulk discounting, but margin
offset from operating leverage and lower distribution costs/tonne), and

■ Strong correlation to gross margin improvement in 2002-2014.

Figure 35: Victrex pricing in USD, EUR, GBP / kg Figure 36: Victrex gross margin vs. USD PEEK pricing
130 70% 130
Pricing has remained positive despite new entrants Pricing has driven gross margin improvement
120
120
Victrex Average PEEK Price

110
Evonik enter market 65%
100 China enter market 110
90
Solvay enter market 100
80 60%
70 90
60
80
50
55%

40 70

50% 60
Price (USD/kg) Price (GBP/kg) Price (EUR/kg)

Victrex Gross Margin (LHS) Price (USD/kg)

Source: Company data Source: Company data

Further analysis of returns trends (Figure 37 to Figure 40) demonstrates that utilisation
rates of available capacity is the key driver of ROCE. We note:

■ CFROI and ROCE are currently around the longer-term average despite price
increases and higher gross margins,

■ Asset turns are the key driver of the change in ROCE (vs. margin, which is relatively
steady),

■ We note tonnage production vs. PPE has a large impact on asset turns given the
relatively small production base from which Victrex is growing,

■ The recent decline in ROCE is due to the large PPE additions from the third
production line, and

■ Victrex has the opportunity to increase ROCE as the new facility ramps up.

Victrex (VCTX.L) 21
13 May 2015

Figure 37: ROCE and CFROI Figure 38: Asset turns and EBIT margin
45% 120%
ROCE and CFROI around Longer Term
40% average but trending down since 2011 Asset Turns the key driver of
100% ROCE
35%
30% 80%
25%
60%
20%
15% 40%
10%
20%
5%
0% 0%

CFROI ROCE
EBIT Margin Asset Turns

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse research Source: Company data, Credit Suisse research

Figure 39: Asset turns and production to PPE Figure 40: Production to PPE vs. ROCE
110% 40 55% Recent heavy capex into new facilities and flat 40

100% 35 volumes have depressed ROCE... 35


45%
30 30
90%
25 35%
80% 25
20
70% 25% 20
15
60%
15
10 15%
Production vs PPE key driver of Asset Turns 10
50% 5 ...but this should improve as Capex spend comes
5%
down 5
40% 0
-5% 0

Asset Turns Production to PPE ROCE Production to PPE

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse research Source: Company data, Credit Suisse research

Victrex (VCTX.L) 22
13 May 2015

Competitive position of PEEK


We estimate the threat of product substitution is low based on an analysis of PEEK
performance/price vs. competitor products. We believe Victrex can sustain its No.1
position in the market vs. peers given its leading capacity expansions, balance sheet
strength and first mover advantage in semi-finished products.
PEEK (Polyethyletherketone) is classed as an ultra-high performance polymer due to its
high strength, low weight plus good temperature and chemical resistance. The material
was developed in 1978 by ICI, and Victrex was later spun out through a management
buyout. Victrex has developed a global market for PEEK over the past 30 years. The
product is now used in a multitude of applications. We review performance characteristics
to assess the threat of product substitution.
Figure 41 breaks down the ultra-high performance plastics into three classes. Each class
is suited to different applications highlighted in Figure 42

Figure 41: Overview of ultra-high performance plastics characteristics


Class Materials Pro Con
Amorphous PEI, PES, PSU Strength Lower continuous use temperature only, Lower chemical resistance
Thermoplastics

Semi-Crystalline PPS, PEEK, PPA Strength to weight Medium temperature only, can lose shape at higher temp (PEEK does have
ThermoPlastics higher temperate grade option)

Thermosetting PAI, PI High temperature Requires high temperature (400C) processing equipment and/or secondary
Resins processing steps (e.g. ,15 days post curing to get to max properties)
Source: Credit Suisse research

Figure 42: Overview of ultra-high performance plastics characteristics


Engineering Full name Date of industrial Main use Main property Phase of lifecycle
plastic production
ABS Acrylonitrile-Butadiene-Syrene 1950 Appliances, All rounder Commodity
Automotive
LCP Liquid Crystal Polymers 1980 Electronics, Drug Chemical inert/ heat Mid-stage Growth
delivery deflection 271C
PBT Polybutylene Terephthalate 1970 Fibre optics Strength High End Commodity
PEEK Polyethyletherketone 1980 Cars, planes, High Strength/high Mid-stage Growth
electronics temperature
PMMA Polymethyle methacrylate 1930 PlexiGlass High light Commodity
transmission/ Surface
hardness
PA PolyAmide 1960 Casing Friction Commodity
PSU Polyarylsulphone 1980 Electrical Electrical resistance Late Stage Growth
PC Polycarbonate 1960 CD/DVD Durability Commodity
PI Polyimide 1955 Insulating coatings Temperature/ Niche Applications
resistance
POM polyoxymethylene 1960 Gears/bearings Stiffness Late-stage Growth
PPA Polyphalamide Fuel modules Temperature extremes Growth
PPS Polyphenylene Sulphide 1970 Fuel systems Chemically inert Late-stage Growth
PVDF Polyvinylidene fluoride 1980 Sensors Piezoelectric Late-stage Growth
TPE Thermoplastic polyester elastomer 1970 Catheters Rubber properties
Source: PlasticsEurope.org, Credit Suisse research

Victrex (VCTX.L) 23
13 May 2015

PEEK tends to be chosen for applications that require its best-in-class strength-to-weight
ratio, good chemical/temperature resistance and better processability vs. metal. The
closest competing products are PPS, PSU and PI. Figure 43 highlights a matrix of the four
key performance properties by polymer. We note:

■ PEEK is a winner on strength-to-weight characteristics

■ PPS is the nearest competing plastic to PEEK on strength-to-weight properties

■ PSU scores well on strength-to-weight and is easier to process than PEEK. However,
it cannot withstand continuous high temperature use due to deformation

■ PI has good strength-to-weight characteristics and temperature resistance; however,


the material is difficult to process during product manufacture.

Figure 43: Ultra-high performance plastics characteristics (full details see Figure 75)
Strength to Strength to Strength to
PEI Weight PES Weight PSU Weight

Amorphous

Temperature Temperature Temperature


Processability Processability Processability
Stability Stability Stability

Chemical Chemical Chemical


Resistance Resistance Resistance

Strength to Strength to Strength to

PPS Weight PEEK Weight PPA Weight

Temperature Temperature Temperature


Processability Processability Processability
Stability Stability Stability

Chemical Chemical Chemical


Resistance Resistance Resistance

Strength to Strength to Strength to

PI Weight PAI Weight PBI Weight

Temperature Temperature Temperature


Processability Processability Processability
Stability Stability Stability

Crystalline
Chemical Chemical Chemical
Resistance Resistance Resistance

Source: Credit Suisse research

Victrex (VCTX.L) 24
13 May 2015

Figure 44 details the strength-to-weight ratio of the various plastics vs. the price of the
material. We highlight that PEEK commands the highest price; however, we believe this
price is sustainable given the relative performance of the competing products. We believe
PEEK will remain the material of choice for high-end applications that require strength and
low weight materials.

Figure 44: Strength-to-weight ratio vs. price


140
PEEK
120

100
Market Price ($/kg)

Tungsten Carbide
PPS
80
PAI
60
Titanium
40 PES
PVDF
PSU
20 PA 12
PP PI
HDPE POM
0 PVC ABS
0 20 40 Aluminum
60 80 100 120 140 160 180
Strength-to-weight ratio
Source: Makeitfrom.com, Alibaba.com, Credit Suisse research

Victrex (VCTX.L) 25
13 May 2015

Competitive position of Victrex


Victrex occupies the No. 1 position in PEEK and we believe this is sustainable in the mid-
to-long term. This is due to the following barriers to entry: (1) Largest nameplate capacity
and recently expanded production capabilities, (2) strong balance sheet (low risk supply
for customers), (3) best-in-class technical ability and (4) position in semi-finished/medical
products. We review each of these attributes in the following sections.
Capacity
Victrex has begun production at its third facility in the UK, which will take its total
nameplate PEEK production capacity to 7,150 tonnes/annum. This investment benefits the
business through (1) sustaining its leading production capability in the market, (2) de-
risking potential supply issues for customers, and (3) minimising turnaround time when
switching between PEEK grades (greater efficiency of production).

Figure 45: Estimated supply/demand analysis for PEEK


PEEK Capacity (RHS) 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E
Victrex 2,300 2,300 2,500 2,800 2,800 2,800 3,525 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 4,250 5,983 7,150 7,150 7,150
Solvay 120 150 188 234 293 366 458 572 850 900 1,400 2,500 2,500
Evonik (Jida) 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500 500
Panjin Zhongrun 100 300 500 700 900 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Jilin Zhongyan 0 0 300 600 700 700 900 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000 1,000
Gharda 120 120 120 120
Kingfa 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200
Total 2,420 2,420 2,620 3,420 3,420 3,450 4,213 5,584 6,143 6,516 6,808 7,322 7,800 9,583 11,250 12,350 12,350
8% 31% 0% 1% 22% 33% 10% 6% 4% 8% 7% 23% 17% 10% 0%

PEEK 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E
Victrex 1,205 1,481 1,802 1,972 2,339 2,508 2,626 1,547 2,535 2,860 2,904 2,920 3,551 3,958 4,219 4,591 4,987
Solvay 80 100 140 196 274 384 538 753 850 948 1,010 1,099 1,194
Evonik 50 63 78 98 122 153 191 238 300 334 356 388 421
Panjin Zhang 40 120 200 280 360 400 446 475 517 562
Jilin 120 300 350 350 450 500 557 594 646 702
Gharda 50 50 50 50
Kingfa 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100
Total 1,255 1,531 1,852 2,022 2,469 2,671 2,844 2,101 3,451 4,047 4,363 4,821 5,701 6,344 6,754 7,341 7,966
Growth 22% 21% 9% 22% 8% 7% -26% 64% 17% 8% 11% 18% 11% 6% 9% 9%

Utilisation Rate (LHS) 63% 71% 59% 72% 77% 68% 38% 56% 62% 64% 66% 73% 66% 60% 59% 65%
Victrex Gross Margin (LHS) 55% 55% 55% 57% 62% 64% 65% 62% 64% 68% 66% 67% 65% 64% 64% 64% 64%
Victrex EBIT Margin 32% 32% 34% 37% 39% 39% 24% 40% 43% 43% 42% 40% 41% 41% 42% 42%
Source: Company data (company websites), Credit Suisse estimates for Victrex, Solvay and Evonik

Figure 45 gives our estimated supply-demand history and forecasts for the global PEEK
market. We highlight the large additions to capacity this year and next from Victrex and
Solvay. Large increases to nameplate capacity raises some concern for any product.
However, we believe that given the niche markets and specialty nature of PEEK there
should be no impact on real prices/gross margins. This is further backed up by the data
shown in Figure 46, which show little correlation between industry utilisation rates and
Victrex's gross margin.
Additionally, we would highlight that the Chinese product is of lower quality and sold only
into compounders rather than for pure PEEK applications. We believe the consistency of
product is a major consideration for pure PEEK applications in which China cannot
compete. Therefore, we believe the risk of competing on price with Victrex's customers is
low.

■ We believe 60-70% operating rates globally will not prove an issue for industry pricing.
The limited number of suppliers, the extent to which PEEK is integrated into
engineering critical designs, and rapid growth means that a capacity overhead is
required.

Victrex (VCTX.L) 26
13 May 2015

■ The lack of margin correlation highlights the specialty nature of the product and B2B
negotiated pricing based on quality, surety of supply and expertise rather than a
homogenous commodity product.

Figure 46: Victrex gross margin vs. industry utilisation rate


90% 70%

80%

70%
65%
60%

50%
60%
40%

30%
55%
20%

10%

0% 50%

Utilisation Rate (LHS) Victrex Gross Margin (RHS)

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Balance sheet/portfolio opportunity


We forecast a £50mn net cash position for Victrex at the end of 2015 (post special
dividend from 2014). We believe management would be hesitant to run a net debt position
in the near term (see Balance Sheet section); however, the ongoing FCF (>c.£45mn p.a.)
provides ample opportunity for technology acquisitions, in our view.

Figure 47: Portfolio position of PEEK producers (bubble size represents capacity)
15
Victrex
Downstream Integration of PEEK

13
11
9
Solvay
7
5
Jilin
3
Evonik
Panjin
1
-1 0 2 4 6 8 10 12
-3
Engineering Plastic Product/Composite Offering

Source: Credit Suisse research

Victrex (VCTX.L) 27
13 May 2015

Victrex currently has the greatest PEEK production capacity and best technical capabilities
Figure 48. However, given Victrex produces only PEEK and PEEK derivatives, we do
acknowledge a portfolio gap compared to Solvay, which has the broadest range of ultra-
high performance polymers on the market.
We believe Victrex and Solvay will continue to move in two different strategic directions
within ultra-high performance polymers, with Solvay pushing for a broader portfolio offering
and Victrex pushing downstream into semi-finished and medical.
We believe building out a semi-finished offering and medical device market will allow
Victrex to (1) capture additional value through the chain, (2) diversify the market, and (3)
reduce the price risk/commoditisation for PEEK in the longer term (15+ years). We do
highlight that this strategy is not without risk and we believe the growth estimates of the
Invibio division should be discounted as such. We highlight risk from:
1) Regulatory acceptance in knee, and
2) Investment cost of building new markets

Figure 48: Pure PEEK performance


Victrex Solvay Evonik
Basic High temperature Keta-Spire VestaKeep
Melting point (C) 343 373 340 340
Glass transition (C) 143 160 150
Density (g.cm-3) 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.3
Tensile strength yield (Mpa) 100 100 96.5 98
Strength to weight (tensile/density) 77 77 74 75
Flexural strength (Mpa) 170 170 146
Source: Company data

Figure 49 gives our SWOT analysis for PEEK production at each of the PEEK producers.
We believe Victrex will remain a best-in-class producer through a combination of superior
technology, semi-finished/medical product capability and close customer ties.

Figure 49: SWOT analysis between PEEK producers


Victrex Solvay Evonik Jilin Panjin
Strength No.1 on technology, customer No.2 on technology. Portfolio Cost of manufacture Cost of manufacture
base and focus Best portfolio
Weakness Portfolio offer vs. Solvay No semi-finished Technology Technology Technology
Opportunity Semi-finished/Medical Downstream product Expansions Market share outside Market share outside
compounders compounders
Threat Undercut on pricing Undercut on pricing Higher performance Higher performance Higher performance
requirement requirement requirement
Source: Credit Suisse research

Victrex (VCTX.L) 28
13 May 2015

Corporate longevity
We believe Victrex can sustain its market, company and product moat over the mid-term.
In the following section, we assess the longer-term pipeline to understand better the likely
corporate longevity of the business.
We believe there is ample opportunity in existing markets to triple total PEEK demand by
2025E (c.12% CAGR) with further opportunity to expand into new markets.

Figure 50: Victrex's pipeline of opportunities—as given by the company—bubble size


represents peak sales potential, timing to meaningful revenue of £1-2mn
100%
Probability of success

75%

50%

25%

0%
0 2 Time to meaningful
4 revenue6 of 1m-£2m) 8 10

Horizon 1 Horizon 2 Horizon 3


(0-2 years) (2-5 years) (5 years +)

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse research

Pipeline
Figure 51 highlights Victrex's pipeline of opportunity as given by the company. We risk
weight the market opportunities in Figure 52. The combined average probability of success
is 61% based on company guidance. This would drive 8% CAGR if we assume all projects
reach peak revenue by 2025 (timing not given by management) (Figure 53). This excludes
underlying growth in other areas of the business.

We estimate 8% CAGR over the next four years. We justify this sustained growth
assumption in the following sections.

Victrex (VCTX.L) 29
13 May 2015

Figure 51: Victrex's pipeline of opportunities—as given by the company

Source: Company data

Figure 52: Split of potential revenue from Victrex' pipeline of opportunities (£mn)
Revenue
Revenue in Uncertain
weighted Risk rate
peak year revenues
probability
1-2 Years to material revenue (not peak) 40 80% 20% 8
2-5 Years to material revenue (not peak) 355 61% 39% 138
5+ Years to material revenue (not peak) 50 45% 55% 28

Pipeline 5+ years 445 61% 39% 173


Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Figure 53: Implied revenue contribution from Victrex' pipeline of opportunities (£mn)
2015 2016 2017 2018 2025 (CS est) CAGR Implied Probability
Victrex Revenue Pipeline 445 100%
Victrex Probability Weighted Pipeline 272 61%

Victrex Revenue based on Probability Weighted Pipeline 526 8%


CS Forecast Group Revenue 255 272 297 320 8%
Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 30
13 May 2015

Market potential
Figure 54 outlines Credit Suisse forecasts for aerospace production and automotive
production to 2020. We estimate that each Being 787 uses 1 tonne of PEEK (Airbus
380/350, 0.4 tonne), average mass market cars 6 grams per vehicle and premium cars
100g per vehicle. Assuming no further penetration of PEEK into aerospace/automotive
applications, this would support c.6% CAGR growth.

Figure 54: Estimated potential PEEK consumption from Aerospace and Automotive
Production Data 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E 2019E 2020E
Boeing 787 Production 0 0 0 3 46 65 114 122 132 144 168 168 168
Airbus 380/350 12 10 18 26 30 25 31 45 78 114 127 149 149
Automotive Production 67 59 74 77 81 84 87 92 96 101 105
of which
Mass Market 61 53 66 69 73 76 79 82 86 91 95
Premium 7 6 7 8 8 8 9 9 10 10 11

Peek Useage
Boeing 787 (tonne) 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Airbus 330 (tonne) 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4
Mass Market Auto (gram) 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6
Premium Auto (gram) 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100

Implied PEEK use aerospace 5 4 7 13 58 75 126 140 163 190 219 228 228
Implied PEEK use Auto (tons) 1037 911 1136 1178 1254 1298 1344 1411 1477 1554 1623
Total PEEK consumed in Transport 1042 915 1143 1192 1312 1373 1470 1551 1640 1744 1842
Growth -12% 25% 4% 10% 5% 7% 5% 6% 6% 6%
Change YoY -127 228 48 120 61 97 81 89 104 98

Victrex Transport Volumes 723 425 674 741 744 799 962
YoY Volume Change -298 249 67 3 55 163
Source: Credit Suisse estimates, Company data, IHS

Figure 55 to Figure 59 outline our estimates for potential PEEK market tonnage by 2025
including further market penetration. Victrex believes that the potential PEEK market has
the opportunity to grow to an excess of 80kt (no timing given). We believe the market has
the potential to grow to >17kt (from 5.5kt) by 2025. This would support c.12% volume
CAGR through the period, ahead of our more conservative forecasts (high-single-digit
estimates). Our assumptions are based on the following:
Transport: Assumes mass market cars consume 12g PEEK per vehicle (from c.6g
currently). Premium vehicles use 200g PEEK (from c.100g currently). Boing 787 uses 1.5
tonnes (from 1 tonne) and Airbus uses 1 tonne (from an estimated c.0.4 tonnes currently).
This creates a c.4kt market that would be three times bigger than the current market and
represents 11% CAGR.
Electronics: Assumes audio film penetrates 2bn mobile devices (from 1bn currently), and
5% of structural plastic components in mobile phone handsets are replaced by PEEK. This
creates a c.8kt market that would be four times bigger than the current market and
represents 16% CAGR.
Industrial: Assumes 5% market growth and 30 new offshore rigs using PEEK-based
pipelines (risers, jumpers, flowlines). This creates a c.5kt market that would be two times
bigger than the current market and represents 9% CAGR.
Medical: Assumes 8% market growth in line with the industry. This creates a c.1kt market
that would be two times bigger than the current market and represents an 8% CAGR.

Importantly, while we highlight the market potential of 12% CAGR, our volume
estimates remain more conservative (c.9%).

Victrex (VCTX.L) 31
13 May 2015

Figure 55: Potential PEEK transport market volume Figure 56: Potential PEEK electronic market volume
(2025E) (2025E)
Potential Transport PEEK volumes in 2025 Potential Electronic PEEK volumes in 2025
Market 2025 (tonne) Market 2025 (tonne)
Boeing 787 (to 1.5 tonne) 252 Current Market @ 5%CAGR 2,799
Airbus (to 1 tonne) 373 Audio Film (2bn unit penetration) 155
Mass Market (to 12g/car) 1,207 Structural Components 4,749
Premium (to 200g/car) 2,235 Total 7,702
Total 4,066
Current Market 1,718
Market Now 1,470
Total Growth 448%
Total Growth 277% CAGR 16%
CAGR 11%
Source: Credit Suisse estimates Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Figure 57: Potential PEEK industrial market volume Figure 58: Potential PEEK medical market volume (2025E)
(2025E)
Potential Industrial PEEK volumes in 2025 Potential Medical PEEK volumes in 2025
Market 2025 (tonne) Market 2025 (tonne)
Current Market @ 5%CAGR 3,247 Current Market @ 8%CAGR 782
Oil Sub-sea infrastructure 1,366
Total 782
Total 4,612
Current Market 362
Current Market 1,993
Total Growth 216%
Total Growth 231% CAGR 8%
CAGR 9%
Source: Credit Suisse estimates Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Figure 59: Potential total PEEK market volume by 2025E


Total Potential Market by 2025 17,162

Current Market 5,500

Multiple 3.1
CAGR 12%
Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 32
13 May 2015

Balance sheet and cash


Victrex is currently running a net cash position (we estimate +£50mn YE 2015 post a
£0.50/per share special dividend from 2014). We believe management will remain
conservative with the balance sheet in order to reassure customers (concerned with future
supply risk). This is a key consideration for Victrex given, (1) the small number of players
in the PEEK market, (2) long-term contracts (e.g., aerospace) and (3) engineering design
requirements built into customer's pipelines.
We forecast increasing FCFF over the coming years as earnings increase and capex
requirements decline. We estimate that to operate a comfortable £30-40m net cash
position Victrex can pay a special dividend of £35m p.a. (£0.40/share) in the absence of
acquisitions. This takes the total dividend yield to 4.5-5% and we believe the most likely
use of cash beyond a smaller technology acquisition in medical.

Figure 60: Balance sheet, cash and returns to shareholders (£m)


Cash Flow 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E
Operating Income (reported) 55 25 75 94 94 94 102 105 111 123 133
Capex -25 -7 -5 -9 -27 -41 -66 -42 -32 -28 -28
Change in Working Capital -5 -6 10 -11 -13 -4 5 -9 -4 -5 -5
Tax/D&A/Other -41 -21 -155 -131 -92 -87 -72 -97 -140 -167 -185
Free cash flow to the Firm 16 9 75 57 39 38 30 43 65 77 86
Dividend 15 16 63 27 32 36 81 75 78 83 87
FCF 1 -7 12 30 7 1 -51 -33 -13 -5 -1

Dividend/share (p)
Ordinary 18 19 25 33 37 43 45 48 51 56 60
Special 0 0 50 0 0 0 50 40 40 40 40
Total 18 19 75 33 37 43 95 88 91 96 100
Dividend Yield (total) 4.5% 4.6% 4.9% 5.1%

Balance Sheet (£m)


Net Debt / (Net Cash) -24 -19 -77 -72 -84 -92 -90 -52 -42 -42 -45
EBITDA (adj) 62 33 83 103 104 104 112 117 125 138 148
Net Debt/EBITDA -0.4 -0.6 -0.9 -0.7 -0.8 -0.9 -0.8 -0.4 -0.3 -0.3 -0.3
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Figure 61: Operating cash flow vs. net debt (cash) (£mn)
200

150
132.4 143.1
100 118.3 121.4
100.9 108.2
90.9 91.2 89.9
50
61.9
26.8
0
2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
-50

-100

-150
Operating Cash flow Net debt / (cash)

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 33
13 May 2015

Acquisition environment
Victrex is a high quality, high returns specialty polymers business that makes the company
an attractive target for M&A activity. We highlight that the majority of large cap European
specialty chemicals seek acquisitions in the specialty end of the space with strong cash
flows and a strong technology position.
We believe possible acquiring companies include BASF, Evonik and Solvay given their
size and stated acquisition strategy. However, valuation remains a sizeable hurdle.

Competitor takeout bid: Victrex market cap c.USD2.5bn


We believe the more likely potential bidders would be either BASF or Evonik for the
reasons highlighted below; however, we estimate a relatively low likelihood given valuation
hurdles.
We note that BASF has up to $6bn of balance sheet headroom and a strategic impetus to
move into downstream business. However, near-term cash flow is likely to come under
pressure for BASF (given lower oil price) and we believe Victrex's valuation would be
prohibitive in regard to BASF's acquisition KPI of >8% ROI.
Evonik also has substantial balance sheet headroom given its net cash position. It is
targeting acquisitions of up to $6bn in consumer/resource efficiency. Victrex would bolster
its strategic position in PEEK and improve the quality of the portfolio. Again valuation
remains the key hurdle, in our view.
Solvay already has a strong position in PEEK, and we believe it aims to grow the business
organically.

Figure 62: Likelihood of competitor takeout bid


Competitors Readily available balance FCF 2015E Comment Likelihood
sheet (0=None, 10=High)
BASF USD 6bn USD 300m Target downstream consumer business, but cash flow not 3
supportive in near term
Solvay USD 2.5bn USD 600m Potential B/S headroom following portfolio restructuring 2
Net cash, looking for acquisition <USD 6bn in
Evonik USD 6bn USD (750)m consumer/resource efficiency 5
Source: Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 34
13 May 2015

Group overview
Victrex produces the ultra-high performance engineering plastic PEEK for industrial,
transportation, electronic and medical applications. Victrex also produces semi-finished
products for the electronics, medical and oil & gas markets. The company occupies the
No.1 position in PEEK (60% market) and generates c.45% EBITDA margins, c.40% ROCE
and 15% CFROI.
The high returns are sustained through the high value offering of PEEK in niche
applications. We estimate the total PEEK market is currently c.5-6 kt and growing at a high
single/double digit rate. We believe growth opportunities, capex plans and market growth
supports the following:

■ Volume: We forecast 12% volume growth in 2015 (H1 strength from electronics; the
Credit Suisse Chemicals team is more cautious on further growth in H2 given
additional volumes support from competitor capacity constraints) and mid- to high-
single-digit growth through the forecast period.
■ Price: We forecast c.10% price declines in 2015 as lower input costs (oil derived) are
passed onto the customer and lower ASP in electronics affects mix. In the mid-term
we forecast raw material price pass-through only. We believe Victrex should hold
underlying selling prices despite increasing capacity in the industry.
■ Operating leverage: We forecast 150 bps margin increases to 2018, a function of
increasing leverage from the third production facility that commenced production in H1
2015.

Figure 63: Geographic revenues 2014A Figure 64: Group forecasts


350 50%
45%
3% 300
40%
22% 250 35%
Revenue (£mn)

200 30%
25%
43% 150 20%
100 15%
10%
50
5%
32%
0 0%

Group Sales (lhs) Group margins (rhs)


UK EMEA Americas Asia-Pacific

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse research Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 35
13 May 2015

Figure 65: Group overview for Victrex


Costs to Geographic Revenues Operating Description Customers Market Share
EBITDA Mix 2014 Profit
2014

Industrial
39% Industrial: Seals, connectors, VPS:
bearings and pipes for industrial Airbus,
Audi, Victrex
machinery and oil and gas 60%
Boeing,
COMAC,
General Motors,
VPS =79%
EMEA Transport
27% Magma,
Cost of 43% Victrex
Polymer Transport: Clutch , transmission, Sharp
Sales
64% Solutions gears and fuel system components
71% used in automotive and aerospace

Electronics
22%

Electronics: FAB equipment,


acoustic film for mobile devices,
Medical
Americas 13%
mobile phone components. Solvay
32% 15%

Invibio:
Medical,
SG&A
Invibio BioMaterial = 21%

Healthcare business
18%
Spine Stryker, Panjin
77% Spine: Spinal implants Zimmer, Zhongrun &
Invibio
Biomaterial Synthes Jilin
Arthroscopy: Hip implants, knee
APAC Solutions 15%
treatment
R&D 22% 29%
12%
Arthroscopy
Target markets: Dental disc,
11% trauma and knee Evonik
5%
Other Target
6% markets
UK 3%
11%

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse research

Figure 66: Timeline of PEEK

PEEK
Victrex Solvay Evonik Chinese Producers
1978 PEEK invented by ICI
1993 Managament buyout forms Victrex
1995 Victrex Floated on LSE
1999 Victrex buys upstream BDF facility
2000 Victrex Launch Invibio
2005 Victrex buys upstream BDF facility Evonik Launch Jida JV (PEEK)
2006 Victrex Opens Technical Centre in Asia Buys Gharda (Indian PEEK business)
2008 Victrex opens 2nd PEEK facility Expands PEEK production
Jilin/Panjin enter the
2009 PEEK market
2015 Victrex launches 3rd facility Further de-bottlenecking
2017 New PEEK facility in US
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse research

Victrex (VCTX.L) 36
13 May 2015

VPS division (79% sales, 71% EBIT)


Victrex Polymer Division (VPS) provides PEEK material and semi-finished PEEK products
for industrial, transport, electronics and medical device markets.
Victrex aims to sustain its leading global market position through the addition of a third
production line, which will increase its capacity by 60% once fully ramped. Victrex aims to
maintain high returns/margins through a continued push into semi-finished PEEK
products. Victrex currently produces specialty film for audio applications in portable
electronics and some semi-finished goods for the oil and gas industry.

■ Volume: We forecast 9% volume growth through the forecast period. In the near term,
we believe oil & gas markets will constrain end-market demand for VPS; however,
robust demand from product penetration in electronics markets should more than
offset this. In the mid-term, we estimate that Victrex can continue to outpace its
weighted market growth (3-4%) by more than 5%, in line with its historical average.

■ Price: We forecast price pass-through of raw materials only.

■ Operating leverage: We forecast 200 bps of upside potential to margins as Victrex


ramps up new production capacity.

Figure 67: Divisional overview—Victrex Polymer Solutions


Victrex Polymer Solutions High performance materials for a diverse range of markets Basic Model Drivers Proxy
Revenue Volume Market + Penetration + De/re-stock
Growth rating Good - 10% CAGR above market driven by product penetration and
replacing metal in specialist applications
Price B2B negotiation with cost pass through
Stability rating Medium - leading position, dominant market share, high margin, net Mix Electronics lower selling price
cash but de/re-stocking cycles Production in UK, hedge c85% 12m
Cash rating Strong - High margin, robust cash generation
FX
forward

Divisional Overview PEEK (Engineering Plastic) material and semi finished products for Cost Base Variable (50%) Benzene and propylene derivatives
Industry/Energy, Automotive, Aerospace and Electronics markets
Fixed (50%) CPI / New investments costs
Capacity After new investements coming on stream Victrex will have 7kt
capacity, occupying c70% of the market. Global Demand 5-6kt/annum.
Market Risk New entrants into PEEK production
Revenue Drivers
Contractual Terms 15% spot, 85% contract (average 2.5 yrs duration) with pass through
raw materials 10%
Volume Volumes driven by Industrial market 34%, Transport 27%, Electronics Industrial
29% and Medical 10%
34%
Pricing Pricing is set on specification, application and raw materials pass Transport
through
29%
Electronics
Cost Base Fixed costs 50%, variable costs 50%
Largest component of raw materials is benzene derivatives (75% of Medical
raws) and propylene derivatives (25%)
Operating rates globally slightly below 75% declining to c60% by 27%
2016E.

Market Position Global leader in PEEK based polymer production with c70% of market
share. 4 major competitors inlcude Solvay, Evonik, Panjin Zhongrun and 300 50%
Jilin Zhongyan 40%
200
30%
Customers Airbus, Audi, Boeing, COMAC, General Motors, Magma, Sharp
20%
100
Strategy Maintain a global leader in PEEK based polymer production and 10%
accelerate growth by moving downstream towards end customers with 0 0%
new products and technologies. Keep capacity investments ahead of
demand
Victrex Polymer Solutions Sales
Regional Sales 43% EMEA, 32% Americas, 22% Asia-Pacic, 3% UK Victrex Polymer Solutions margins

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 37
13 May 2015

Invibio division (21% sales, 29% EBIT)


Invibio provides PEEK-based semi-finished parts for the medical device market. The
division was launched in 2000 and has grown to over 20% of group sales. The core
markets at present is spine; this comprises fusion cages and rods used in spinal fusion
operations. Victrex is looking to develop markets further in arthroscopy, knee, trauma and
dental applications.
In the longer term, we forecast:

■ Volume: We forecast flat volumes in 2015 (destocking) and 10% volume growth
thereafter as Victrex continues to outpace the underlying medical technology market
(c.5%) by more than 5%.

■ Price: We forecast price pass-through of raw materials only.

■ Operating leverage: We forecast flat EBIT margin as volumes increase in the spine
business and increasing capex is invested into the division.

Figure 68: Divisional overview—Invibio


Invibio Biomaterial Solutions PEEK based polymer solutions to the implantable medical device market Basic Model Drivers Proxy
Revenue Volume Driven by medical market demand/ de/re-stock
Growth rating Good - >10% CAGR - expanding the business into new applications Price B2B negociation
Stability rating Medium - Risk from regulatory approvals, Government policy risk, de/re-stocking Mix
cycles FX UK production, Hedge c85% 12m fwd
Cash rating
Cost Base Variable (50%) Benzene and propylene derivatives
Divisional Overview Invibio is a market leader in providing versatile and high performance PEEK based Fixed (50%) CPI / New investments costs
polymer solutions for the medical market
Products Predominantly focused around implantable medical devices. Spine remains their Market Risk New entrants into medical PEEK production, regulatory approvals
core market, but arthroscopy, knee, dental and trauma are developing areas.

14%
Revenue Drivers
10% Spine
Contractual Terms B2B negotiated
Volume Volumes driven by Medical industry demand and customer acceptance Arthroscopy
Pricing Pricing is set based on application/value add Target markets
75%
Cost Base Fixed costs 50%, variable costs 50%
Largest component of raw materials is benzene derivatives (75% of raws) and
propylene derivatives (25%)
80 65%

Market Position Market leader - only PEEK producer AND semi-finished manufacturer 60
Barrier to entry Regulatory hurdles and proof of performance 60%
40
Customers Medical and healhcare business 55%
20
Strategy Focus on Spine market and key emerging economies particularly China. Further 0 50%
acceleration of growth in new areas eg dental, trauma and knee.

Regional Sales 65% Americas, 27% EMEA, 7% Asia-Pacic Invibio Biomaterial Solutions Sales Invibio Biomaterial Solutions margins

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 38
13 May 2015

Profit & loss forecasts


Figure 69: P&L statement (£m)
P&L (£m) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E

Revenue 122.5 131.0 141.1 103.8 189.5 215.8 219.8 221.9 252.6 254.7 271.8 294.5 315.9
% growth 21% 7% 8% -26% 83% 14% 2% 1% 14% 1% 7% 8% 7%
Cost of Goods Sold (46.7) (46.6) (49.5) (39.3) (68.9) (69.4) (74.1) (74.1) (89.4) (91.7) (97.9) (106.0) (113.7)
COGS as % of Sales 38.1% 35.5% 35.1% 37.9% 36.4% 32.2% 33.7% 33.4% 35.4% 36% 36% 36% 36%

Gross Profit 75.8 84.5 91.6 64.5 120.6 146.4 145.7 147.8 163.2 163.0 174.0 188.4 202.2
Gross margin % 61.9% 64.5% 64.9% 62.1% 63.6% 67.8% 66.3% 66.6% 64.6% 64.0% 64.0% 64.0% 64.0%

Sales, marketing & administration expenses (overheaads


(30.7)inc D&A)
(33.2) (37.0) (39.4) (45.7) (52.6) (51.7) (53.8) (61.0) (57.7) (62.5) (65.6) (69.6)
Overheads as % of Sales 25.1% 25.4% 26.2% 38.0% 24.1% 24.4% 23.5% 24.2% 24.1% 23% 23% 22% 22%

EBITDA 61.6 33.4 83.4 102.6 103.6 103.5 112.2 117.3 125.4 137.7 148.1
EBITDA margin % 43.6% 32.2% 44.0% 47.5% 47.1% 46.6% 44.4% 46.1% 46.1% 46.8% 46.9%
% growth -45.8% 149.8% 23.0% 1.0% -0.1% 8.4% 4.6% 6.9% 9.8% 7.5%

Depreciation & Amortization 7.0 8.3 8.5 8.8 9.6 9.5 10.0 12.0 14.0 14.8 15.4
% growth 18.5% 2.4% 3.5% 9.1% -1.0% 5.3% 20.0% 16.7% 6.0% 3.9%

Operating profit 45.1 51.2 54.6 25.1 74.9 93.8 94.0 94.0 102.2 105.3 111.4 122.8 132.6
EBIT margin % 36.8% 39.1% 38.7% 24.2% 39.5% 43.5% 42.8% 42.4% 40.5% 41.4% 41.0% 41.7% 42.0%
% growth 31.6% 13.7% 6.5% -54.0% 198.5% 25.2% 0.2% 0.0% 8.7% 3.0% 5.8% 10.2% 8.0%

Victrex polymer solutions 41.1 6.3 48.3 66.8 68.5 68.6 77.2 79.5 82.7 90.0 95.8
Invibio Biomaterial solutions 14.5 20.0 28.1 30.3 29.2 29.3 29.6 30.4 33.3 37.4 41.4
Unallocated central costs (1.0) (1.2) (1.5) (3.3) (3.7) (3.9) (4.6) (4.6) (4.6) (4.6) (4.6)

TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE
EBITDA (£/kg) 21.6 32.9 35.9 35.7 35.4 31.6 29.6 29.7 30.0 29.7
EBIT (£/kg) 16.2 29.5 32.8 32.4 32.2 28.8 26.6 26.4 26.8 26.6

Financial income 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.6 0.8 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6
2.5% 0.5% 0.1% 0.7% 0.7% 0.9% 0.7% 1.2% 1.4% 1.4% 1.3%

Financial expenses (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.2) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) (0.1)
#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!

Net financial income 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5

Profit before tax 46.1 52.0 55.0 25.1 74.9 94.2 94.5 94.6 102.7 105.8 111.9 123.3 133.1

Tax (14.3) (15.6) (16.0) (7.3) (20.9) (23.0) (22.6) (21.7) (22.5) (23.3) (24.6) (27.1) (29.3)
Tax on exceptionals 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Income tax expense (14.3) (15.6) (16.0) (7.3) (20.9) (23.0) (22.6) (21.7) (22.5) (23.3) (24.6) (27.1) (29.3)
Effective tax rate % 31.0% 30.0% 29.0% 29.0% 27.9% 24.4% 23.9% 22.9% 21.9% 22.0% 22.0% 22.0% 22.0%

Profit to owners of the parent 31.8 36.4 39.1 17.8 54.0 71.2 71.9 72.9 80.2 82.5 87.3 96.2 103.8

Per share Data:

Weighted number of shares (mn):


Basic 81.7 82.3 82.9 83.3 83.9 84.3 84.8 85.3 85.8 86.3 86.8
Diluted 82.4 82.7 83.8 84.3 84.5 84.7 85.1 85.5 86.0 86.5 87.0

Change 0.6 0.6 0.4 0.6 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
0.4 1.1 0.5 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5

EPS
Basic (p) 39.4 44.9 47.8 21.7 65.1 85.3 85.7 86.5 94.6 96.8 101.8 111.5 119.7
Diluted (p) 38.9 44.4 47.4 21.6 64.4 84.4 85.1 86.0 94.3 96.6 101.6 111.3 119.4

Basic EPS Growth % 34.5% 14.0% 6.5% -54.6% 200.0% 31.0% 0.5% 0.9% 9.4% 2.3% 5.2% 9.5% 7.3%
Diluted EPS Growth % 34.1% 14.1% 6.8% -54.4% 198.1% 31.1% 0.8% 1.1% 9.6% 2.4% 5.2% 9.5% 7.3%

DPS (ordinary)
Interim DPS as % of total ordinary 29.2% 27% 28% 27% 26% 25% 24% 24% 25% 25.2% 25.2% 25.2% 25.2%
Interim (p) 4.2 4.7 5.2 5.2 6.4 8.0 9.0 10.4 11.4 12.2 12.8 14.0 15.1
Final (p) 10.2 12.6 13.1 14.0 18.6 24.5 28.4 32.7 33.8 36.1 38.0 41.6 44.6
Special (p) 50.0 50.0 40.0 40.0 40.0 40.0

Total ordinary DPS (p) 14.4 17.3 18.3 19.2 25.0 32.5 37.4 43.0 45.2 48.3 50.8 55.6 59.7

Total DPS (p) (Ordinary + Special) 18.3 19.2 75.0 32.5 37.4 43.0 95.2 88.3 90.8 95.6 99.7

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 39
13 May 2015

Balance sheet forecasts


Figure 70: Balance sheet (£ mn)
Balance Sheet (£m) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E

Assets
Non-current assets
Property, plant & equipment 112.8 129.9 129.5 125.3 125.5 143.6 175.7 227.6 257.6 275.6 288.8 301.3
Intangible assets 11.5 10.9 10.3 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1 10.1
Investments 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Deferred tax assets 5.8 8.1 7.1 9.7 9.0 7.1 6.3 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1 7.1
Other receivables 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Japanese JV Investment 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Total non-current assets 130.0 148.9 146.8 145.1 144.6 160.8 192.1 244.8 274.8 292.8 306.0 318.5

Current assets
Inventories 27.9 31.7 37.2 34.5 45.0 48.6 51.1 44.2 56.2 60.0 65.0 69.8
Current income tax assets 0.4 0.2 1.0 0.8 0.8 1.6 1.2 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7
Trade & other receivables 15.9 18.2 15.7 19.1 24.2 26.8 26.5 33.0 31.6 33.7 36.5 39.2
Derivative financial instruments 2.1 0.9 1.7 2.2 0.9 4.0 5.1 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0
Cash & cash equivalents 17.1 23.5 18.6 77.3 72.3 83.9 91.6 89.6 52.1 42.0 41.7 45.3

Total current assets 63.4 74.5 74.1 133.9 143.2 164.9 175.5 171.5 144.6 140.4 147.9 158.9

Total assets 193.5 223.4 221.0 279.0 287.8 325.7 367.6 416.3 419.4 433.2 453.9 477.5

Liabilities
Non-current liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities (12.7) (14.7) (15.6) (15.7) (14.8) (14.0) (15.6) (17.8) (17.8) (17.8) (17.8) (17.8)
Retirement benefit obligations (7.1) (6.4) (10.8) (9.5) (6.2) (4.0) (3.6) (7.8) (7.8) (7.8) (7.8) (7.8)

Total non-current liabilities (19.8) (21.0) (26.4) (25.2) (21.0) (18.0) (19.2) (25.6) (25.6) (25.6) (25.6) (25.6)

Current liabilities
Derivative financial instruments (1.5) (10.5) (6.3) (2.3) (3.2) (0.3) (0.4) (2.3) (2.3) (2.3) (2.3) (2.3)
Short term borrowings (3.4) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Current income tax liabilities (11.1) (8.3) (5.4) (15.1) (12.5) (13.0) (10.7) (7.9) (7.9) (7.9) (7.9) (7.9)
Trade & other payables (16.2) (16.8) (14.6) (25.1) (29.5) (23.3) (23.6) (27.1) (28.6) (30.5) (33.1) (35.5)

Total current liabilities (32.2) (35.5) (26.3) (42.5) (45.2) (36.6) (34.7) (37.3) (38.8) (40.7) (43.3) (45.7)

Total liabilities (52.0) (56.6) (52.7) (67.7) (66.2) (54.6) (53.9) (62.9) (64.4) (66.3) (68.9) (71.3)

Net assets 141.5 166.8 168.2 211.3 221.6 271.1 313.7 353.4 355.0 366.9 385.0 406.2

Equity
Share capital 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
Share premium 18.1 20.7 21.7 24.3 27.1 29.1 31.3 34.4 34.4 34.4 34.4 34.4
Translation reserve (0.6) 0.5 2.4 2.6 3.0 2.0 1.5 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8
Hedging reserve 0.0 (5.6) (1.7) 0.1 (1.6) 2.1 3.3 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.9
Retained earnings 123.1 150.3 145.0 183.5 192.3 237.1 276.8 316.4 318.0 329.9 348.0 369.2

Total equity attributable to owners 141.5 166.8 168.2 211.3 221.6 271.1 313.7 353.4 355.0 366.9 385.0 406.2
Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 40
13 May 2015

Figure 71: Working capital, PPE and balance sheet ratios (£m)
Working Capital 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E

NWC 27.5 33.1 38.2 28.5 39.7 52.1 54.0 50.1 59.2 63.2 68.4 73.4

NWC as % of sales 21% 23% 37% 15% 18% 24% 24% 20% 23% 23% 23% 23%

Impact 13.1 5.5 5.2 -9.7 11.2 12.4 1.9 -3.9 9.1 4.0 5.3 5.0

Inventories (£mn)

Cost of sales 46.6 49.5 39.3 68.9 69.4 74.1 74.1 89.4 91.7 97.9 106.0 113.7
as % of COGS 60% 64% 95% 50% 65% 66% 69% 49% 61% 61% 61% 61%
Impact 4.9 3.8 5.5 -2.7 10.5 3.6 2.5 -6.9 12.0 3.8 5.0 4.7

At the year end 27.9 31.7 37.2 34.5 45.0 48.6 51.1 44.2 56.2 60.0 65.0 69.8

Trade debtors (£mn)

Sales 131.0 141.1 103.8 189.5 215.8 219.8 221.9 252.6 254.7 271.8 294.5 315.9
as % of COGS 12% 13% 15% 10% 11% 12% 12% 13% 12% 12% 12% 12%
Impact 3.7 2.3 -2.5 3.4 5.1 2.6 -0.3 6.5 -1.4 2.1 2.8 2.7

At the year end 15.9 18.2 15.7 19.1 24.2 26.8 26.5 33.0 31.6 33.7 36.5 39.2

Trade creditors (£mn)

Cost of sales 46.6 49.5 39.3 68.9 69.4 74.1 74.1 89.4 91.7 97.9 106.0 113.7
as % of COGS 35% 34% 37% 36% 43% 31% 32% 30% 31% 31% 31% 31%
Impact -4.5 0.6 -2.2 10.5 4.4 -6.2 0.3 3.5 1.5 1.9 2.5 2.4

At the year end 16.2 16.8 14.6 25.1 29.5 23.3 23.6 27.1 28.6 30.5 33.1 35.5

Property, plant and equipment 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E
PPE at the beginning of the period 112.8 129.9 129.5 125.3 125.5 143.6 175.7 227.6 257.6 275.6 288.8

Capex 25.0 7.5 4.5 9.0 27.0 40.7 65.6 42.0 32.0 28.0 28.0
Capex to sales (%) 0% 18% 7% 2% 4% 12% 18% 26% 16% 12% 10% 9%

Capex to D&A 3.5 0.9 0.5 1.0 2.8 4.3 6.6 3.5 2.3 1.9 1.8

Group
Maintenance 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0 20.0
Growth 15.0 -4.5 -9.5 -7.0 9.0 20.7 45.6 22.0 12.0 8.0 8.0
Total 25.0 7.5 4.5 9.0 27.0 40.7 65.6 42.0 32.0 28.0 28.0
Check TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE TRUE

D&A Total 6.2 7.1 8.4 8.5 8.8 9.6 9.5 10.0 12.0 14.0 14.8 15.4

Acquisitions/Disposal 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

PPE at the end of the period 112.8 129.9 129.5 125.3 125.5 143.6 175.7 227.6 257.6 275.6 288.8 301.3

Metrics 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E

Total ST/LT Debt -3.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Net debt / (Net cash position) -20.5 -23.5 -18.6 -77.3 -72.3 -83.9 -91.6 -89.6 -52.1 -42.0 -41.7 -45.3
Net debt (inc Pensions) -13.4 -17.2 -7.7 -67.8 -66.1 -79.9 -88.0 -81.8 -44.3 -34.2 -33.9 -37.5
Company Net Debt / (Net cash) -20.5 -23.5 -18.6 -77.3 -72.3 -83.9 -91.6 -89.6 -52.1 -42.0 -41.7 -45.3
Capital employed 143.3 149.7 134.0 149.3 187.2 222.1 263.8 302.9 324.9 343.3 360.9

EBITDA (adj) 61.6 33.4 83.4 102.6 103.6 103.5 112.2 117.3 125.4 137.7 148.1

Net Debt / EBITDA (0.4) (0.6) (0.9) (0.7) (0.8) (0.9) (0.8) (0.4) (0.3) (0.3) (0.3)
ND (inc Pensions)/EBITDA (0.3) (0.2) (0.8) (0.6) (0.8) (0.9) (0.7) (0.4) (0.3) (0.2) (0.3)
Equity ratio (equity / total liabilities) 295% 319% 312% 335% 497% 582% 562% 551% 553% 559% 570%
Book Gearing (Net Debt / Equity) -14% -11% -37% -33% -31% -29% -25% -15% -11% -11% -11%
Quick ratio 90% 105% 84% 107% 148% 156% 130% 144% 148% 154% 159%
Current ratio 132% 141% 198% 216% 302% 326% 273% 225% 212% 215% 223%

Return on capital (annualized):


RoA (%) 17% 8% 19% 25% 22% 20% 19% 20% 20% 21% 22%
RoE(%) 23% 11% 26% 32% 27% 23% 23% 23% 24% 25% 26%
RoCE (%) - (EBIT, Adjusted) 38% 17% 56% 63% 50% 42% 39% 35% 34% 36% 37%
RoCE (%) - (Company Definition) 23.4% 10.6% 25.6% 32.1% 26.5% 23.2% 22.7% 23.2% 23.8% 25.0% 25.6%
Assets Turnover 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.9 1.0 0.8 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.8 0.8
EBITDA margin (%) 44% 32% 44% 48% 47% 47% 44% 46% 46% 47% 47%

NAV per Share (cents) (Book / Equity value per share) 202.5 203.4 252.0 262.8 320.9 370.2 415.5 415.4 426.8 445.3 467.1

EV / NAV 9.7 9.6 7.8 7.5 6.1 5.3 4.7 4.7 4.6 4.4 4.2

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 41
13 May 2015

Cash flow forecasts


Figure 72: Cash flow statement and free cash flow (£mn)
Cash Flow (£m) 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E 2016E 2017E 2018E

Profit after tax 39.1 17.8 54.0 71.2 71.9 72.9 80.2 82.5 87.3 96.2 103.8
Income tax expense 16.0 7.3 20.9 23.0 22.6 21.7 22.5 23.3 24.6 27.1 29.3
Net financing income (0.5) (0.0) 0.0 (0.4) (0.5) (0.6) (0.5) (0.5) (0.5) (0.5) (0.5)
Dividends received from subsidiaries

Operating profit 54.6 25.1 74.9 93.8 94.0 94.0 102.2 105.3 111.4 122.8 132.6
Adjustments for:
Depreciation 7.1 8.4 8.5 8.8 9.6 9.5 10.0 12.0 14.0 14.8 15.4
Amortisation
Loss on disposal of non-current assets 0.6 0.6 0.2 0.3 1.3
Increase in inventories (3.8) (5.5) 2.9 (9.7) (4.3) (3.6) 6.7 (12.0) (3.8) (5.0) (4.7)
Decrease/(increase) in receivables (2.3) 2.5 (3.2) (5.5) (2.6) 1.3 (6.5) 1.4 (2.1) (2.8) (2.7)
Decrease/(increase) in payables 1.5 (2.7) 10.2 4.5 (6.5) (1.3) 4.5 1.5 1.9 2.5 2.4
Equity-settled share-based payment transactions 1.6 0.7 1.8 1.6 1.7 1.3 1.1
Change in fair value of derivative financial instruments 2.5 0.4 (2.2) (0.1) (1.1) 0.5 (0.1)
Retirement benefit obligations charge less contributions 0.1 (2.8) (2.2) (2.2) (0.9) (1.1) (0.9) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Cash generated from operations 61.9 26.8 90.9 91.2 89.9 100.9 118.3 108.2 121.4 132.4 143.1
Net financing income received 0.4 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.5 0.8 0.6 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5
Tax paid (15.7) (11.2) (13.7) (25.7) (24.4) (21.7) (21.1) (23.3) (24.6) (27.1) (29.3)
Net cash flow from operating activities 46.6 15.7 77.2 65.9 66.0 80.0 97.8 85.4 97.3 105.8 114.3

Cash flows from investing activities


Acquisition of property, plant & equipment (25.0) (7.5) (4.5) (9.0) (27.0) (40.7) (65.6) (42.0) (32.0) (28.0) (28.0)
Dividends received
Acquisition/Disposal of business 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Net cash flow from investing activities (25.0) (7.5) (4.5) (9.0) (27.0) (40.7) (65.6) (42.0) (32.0) (28.0) (28.0)

Cash flow from financing activities


Proceeds from issue of ordinary shares exercised under option 2.6 0.9 2.6 2.8 2.0 2.2 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Purchase of own shares held (0.9) (1.0) (1.0) (0.8) (0.9) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Decrease in short-term borrowings (4.2)
Dividends paid (14.5) (15.1) (16.9) (63.8) (28.0) (32.7) (37.3) (80.9) (75.5) (78.0) (82.7)
Net cash flow from financing activities (17.0) (15.1) (14.3) (62.0) (26.8) (31.4) (34.1) (80.9) (75.5) (78.0) (82.7)

Net increase in cash & cash equivalents 4.5 (6.9) 58.4 (5.1) 12.2 7.9 (1.9) (37.5) (10.1) (0.2) 3.6
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on cash held 1.9 1.9 0.3 0.1 (0.6) (0.2) (0.1)
Cash & cash equivalents at beginning of year 17.1 23.5 18.6 77.3 72.3 83.9 91.6 89.6 52.1 42.0 41.7
Cash & cash equivalents at end of year 23.5 18.6 77.3 72.3 83.9 91.6 89.6 52.1 42.0 41.7 45.3

Free Cash Flow

Operating Income (reported) 54.6 25.1 74.9 93.8 94.0 94.0 102 105 111 123 133
Tax (15.7) (11.2) (13.7) (25.7) (24.4) (21.7) (21.1) (23.3) (24.6) (27.1) (29.3)
D&A 7.1 8.4 8.5 8.8 9.6 9.5 10.0 12.0 14.0 14.8 15.4
Purchase of property, plant and equipment & intangibles (25.0) (7.5) (4.5) (9.0) (27.0) (40.7) (65.6) (42.0) (32.0) (28.0) (28.0)
Proceeds from sale of property, plant and equipment 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
Change in Working Capital (4.7) (5.7) 9.9 (10.7) (13.4) (3.6) 4.7 (9.1) (4.0) (5.3) (5.0)
Free cash flow to the Firm 16.3 9.2 75.1 57.2 38.8 37.5 30.2 42.9 64.8 77.3 85.8

Finance Costs 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

Free Cash Flow to Equity 16.3 9.2 75.1 57.2 38.8 37.5 30 43 65 77 86
FCFE to Sales 12% 9% 40% 27% 18% 17% 12% 17% 24% 26% 27%

Dividend 15 16 63 27 32 36 81 75 78 83 87

FCF 1.2 (6.7) 12.2 29.8 7.2 1.1 -51 -33 -13 -5 -1

Share Count 82 83 84 84 84 85 85 85 86 86 87

FCFF/Share 19.8 11.1 89.6 67.8 45.9 44.3 35.5 50.2 75.4 89.4 98.6
FCFE/Share 19.8 11.1 89.6 67.8 45.9 44.3 35.5 50.2 75.4 89.4 98.6

Price ($ cent) 1,961 1,961 1,961 1,961 1,961

FCFF Yield 1.8% 2.6% 3.8% 4.6% 5.0%


FCFE yield 1.8% 2.6% 3.8% 4.6% 5.0%

Source: Company data, Credit Suisse estimates

Victrex (VCTX.L) 42
13 May 2015

Appendix
Management
Figure 73: Management
Position Name Background
Chairman Larry Pentz Larry Pentz was appointed to the board in 2008 and became chairman in 2014. Larry has over 30 years
of experience within multi-national corporations in a variety of operational and general management
positions. Larry has been instrumental in the acquisition and integration of multiple catalyst and chemical
companies for Johnson Matthey Plc, and was formerly executive director responsible for Emission
Control Technologies of Johnson Matthey Plc. Larry is currently an executive director of Johnson Matthey
Emission Control Technologies.

Chief Executive David Hummel David Hummel assumed responsibility for VICTREX PEEK worldwide in 1992 and has more than 25
years of experience of the global high performance polymer industry. Formerly with Diamond Shamrock,
GE Plastics and ICI, David was appointed to the board in 1993 following his leading of the successful
MBO of Victrex from ICI.

Group Finance Director Louisa Burdett Louisa Burdett was appointed as group finance director in February 2014. Louisa formerly held the
position of chief financial officer at Optos plc. Before this, Louisa was chief financial officer at the
Financial Times Group from 2008 to 2012. Louisa has also held roles at Chep Europe, a division of
Brambles Ltd, the Australian listed pallet distribution company, GE Healthcare and GlaxoSmithKline plc.
Louisa has also worked as an M&A consultant at Charterhouse Bank and spent four years at KPMG in
London.

Executive Director of VPS Tim Cooper Tim Cooper was appointed to the board in October 2012, and continues in the position of managing
director of Victrex Polymer Solutions, a position Tim has held since joining Victrex in January 2010. Tim
has over 30 years of international business management and commercial experience, having held senior
leadership positions in a number of industries. Before joining the Victrex business, Tim was with Umeco
Plc, initially as managing director of Aerovac Systems Ltd, but later becoming group managing director of
Umeco Composites Process Materials. He has been managing director of Tellermate Plc and of Avery
Berkel Ltd, having developed his international career with GEC, BP and Land Rover.

Executive Director of Invibio Martin Court Martin was appointed to the board in April 2015, and continues in the position of managing director of
Invibio, Victrex's medical business, a position Martin has held since joining Victrex in February 2013.
Martin has significant proven international experience in the medical and high performance materials &
chemicals industries, including with Cytec Industries, and in a number of senior roles at both ICI and
UCB. He is an INSEAD alumni, holds a doctorate in the field of surface chemistry and fracture mechanics
and a BSc (Eng) degree in mineral technology from Imperial College of Science and Technology.
Source: Company data

Shareholder structure
Victrex (VCTX.L) has 100% free float. The list of the top holdings is highlighted in the table
below:

Figure 74: Major shareholders


Shareholders % Holding
Blackrock 9.9%
Mondrian 6.5%
T.Rowe Price 5.7%
Schroder Investment Management 4.0%
Hummel (David Richard) 3.8%
Baillie Gifford & Co 3.8%
Legal & General 3.7%
Aberdeen Asset Management 3.6%
Montanaro Asset Management 3.1%
Royal London Asset Management 3.0%
Kames Capital 3.0%
M&G Investment Management 2.9%
Source: Reuters – Thomson One

Victrex (VCTX.L) 43
13 May 2015

Properties of ultra-high performance plastics


Figure 75: Properties of ultra-high performance plastics
Property Units Description PEEK PAI PI PBI PPS PES PSU POM
Density g/cm3 Weight per volume 1.32-1.51 1.41-1.61 1.33-1.65 1.3 1.34-1.65 1.37 1.24-1.56 1.42-1.56
Compressive Mpa Squeezing force at which 120-300 350
Strength material fails
Elastic Modulus Gpa Stiffness (rigid is high) 4-24 4-8.3 3.7-20 5.9 2.5-2.7
Elongation at % Stretch up to breaking point 1.3-50 2.5-10 1.8-6 3 2.5-20 40-80 2-75 7-60%
break
Flexural Strength MPa Bendiness 160-345 160-205 170-330 220 129 2.7-14 2.8-4.3
Glass Transition C Temperature where the 145 275 260 400 220
Temperature material changes ductility
Heat Deflection C Temperature where heat will 160-316 430 202
Temperature flex the material
Melting Onset C Temperature of melting 340 None 290 180
Strength to kN-m/kg Tensile Strength vs Density 70-161 69-102 88-152 123 63-136 61-66 56-121 43-68
Weight ratio
Tensile strength MPa Force where a cross section of 92-230 100-160 120-215 160 85-190 84-90 70-160 60-70
(ultimate) material ruptures
Water Absorption % Increase in weight after 0.22-0.5 1.5-1.7 0.4 0.1 0.37 0.5
at Saturation immersion in water
Thermal um/m-K Change in dimension per 15-48 9-31 23 53
Expansion temperature change
Limiting Oxygen % Minimum oxygen concentration 38 43 34 58
Index to support burning (22% in
ambient air)

Price Point ($/kg) 135-150 40-70 10-14 1400 68-85 40 18-25


Source: Makeitfrom.com, Credit Suisse research

Victrex (VCTX.L) 44
13 May 2015

Credit Suisse PEERs


PEERs is a global database that captures unique information about companies within the
Credit Suisse coverage universe based on their relationships with other companies – their
customers, suppliers and competitors. The database is built from our research analysts’
insight regarding these relationships. Credit Suisse covers over 3,000 companies globally.
These companies form the core of the PEERs database, but it also includes relationships
on stocks that are not under coverage.
The table below highlights the Credit Suisse PEERS relationship mapping for Victrex. The
table highlights key competitors and customers including: relevancy, trading and analysts
ratings.

Figure 76: PEERs

Source: Credit Suisse PEERs

Victrex (VCTX.L) 45
13 May 2015

Companies Mentioned (Price as of 11-May-2015)


Airbus Group (AIR.PA, €62.09)
BASF (BASFn.DE, €87.54)
Boeing (BA.N, $145.89)
Croda International (CRDA.L, 2851.0p)
Daimler (DAIGn.DE, €88.06)
Evonik (EVKn.DE, €33.3)
General Motors Corp. (GM.N, $35.22)
Solvay (SOLB.BR, €129.05)
Stryker Corporation (SYK.N, $94.36)
Victrex (VCTX.L, 1994.0p, OUTPERFORM, TP 2400.0p)
Zimmer Holdings (ZMH.N, $113.18)

Disclosure Appendix
Important Global Disclosures
Mathew Waugh and Chris Counihan, each certify, with respect to the companies or securities that the individual analyzes, that (1) the views
expressed in this report accurately reflect his or her personal views about all of the subject companies and securities and (2) no part of his or her
compensation was, is or will be directly or indirectly related to the specific recommendations or views expressed in this report.
The analyst(s) responsible for preparing this research report received Compensation that is based upon various factors including Credit Suisse's
total revenues, a portion of which are generated by Credit Suisse's investment banking activities

As of December 10, 2012 Analysts’ stock rating are defined as follows:


Outperform (O) : The stock’s total return is expected to outperform the relevant benchmark*over the next 12 months.
Neutral (N) : The stock’s total return is expected to be in line with the relevant benchmark* over the next 12 months.
Underperform (U) : The stock’s total return is expected to underperform the relevant benchmark* over the next 12 months.
*Relevant benchmark by region: As of 10th December 2012, Japanese ratings are based on a stock’s total return relative to the analyst's coverage universe which
consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector, with Outperforms representing the most attractiv e, Neutrals the less attractive, and
Underperforms the least attractive investment opportunities. As of 2nd October 2012, U.S. and Canadian as well as European ra tings are based on a stock’s total
return relative to the analyst's coverage universe which consists of all companies cove red by the analyst within the relevant sector, with Outperforms representing the
most attractive, Neutrals the less attractive, and Underperforms the least attractive investment opportunities. For Latin Ame rican and non-Japan Asia stocks, ratings
are based on a stock’s total return relative to the average total return of the relevant country or regional benchmark; prior to 2nd Oc tober 2012 U.S. and Canadian
ratings were based on (1) a stock’s absolute total return potential to its current share price and (2 ) the relative attractiveness of a stock’s total return potential within
an analyst’s coverage universe. For Australian and New Zealand stocks, 12-month rolling yield is incorporated in the absolute total return calculation and a 15% and
a 7.5% threshold replace the 10-15% level in the Outperform and Underperform stock rating definitions, respectively. The 15% and 7.5% thresholds replace the +10-
15% and -10-15% levels in the Neutral stock rating definition, respectively. Prior to 10th December 2012, Japanes e ratings were based on a stock’s total return
relative to the average total return of the relevant country or regional benchmark.
Restricted (R) : In certain circumstances, Credit Suisse policy and/or applicable law and regulations preclude certain types of communications,
including an investment recommendation, during the course of Credit Suisse's engagement in an investment banking transaction and in certain other
circumstances.

Volatility Indicator [V] : A stock is defined as volatile if the stock price has moved up or down by 20% or more in a month in at least 8 of the past 24
months or the analyst expects significant volatility going forward.

Analysts’ sector weightings are distinct from analysts’ stock ratings and are based on the analyst’s expectations for the fundamentals and/or
valuation of the sector* relative to the group’s historic fundamentals and/or valuation:
Overweight : The analyst’s expectation for the sector’s fundamentals and/or valuation is favorable over the next 12 months.
Market Weight : The analyst’s expectation for the sector’s fundamentals and/or valuation is neutral over the next 12 months.
Underweight : The analyst’s expectation for the sector’s fundamentals and/or valuation is cautious over the next 12 months.
*An analyst’s coverage sector consists of all companies covered by the analyst within the relevant sector. An analyst may cover multiple sector s.

Victrex (VCTX.L) 46
13 May 2015

Credit Suisse's distribution of stock ratings (and banking clients) is:

Global Ratings Distribution


Rating Versus universe (%) Of which banking clients (%)
Outperform/Buy* 43% (53% banking clients)
Neutral/Hold* 38% (50% banking clients)
Underperform/Sell* 16% (43% banking clients)
Restricted 3%
*For purposes of the NYSE and NASD ratings distribution disclosure requirements, our stock ratings of Outperform, Neutral, and Underperform most closely
correspond to Buy, Hold, and Sell, respectively; however, the meanings are not the same, as our stock ratings are determined on a relative basis. (Please refer to
definitions above.) An investor's decision to buy or sell a security should be based on investment objectives, current holdings, and other indivi dual factors.

Credit Suisse’s policy is to update research reports as it deems appropriate, based on developments with the subject company, the sector or the
market that may have a material impact on the research views or opinions stated herein.
Credit Suisse's policy is only to publish investment research that is impartial, independent, clear, fair and not misleading. For more detail please refer
to Credit Suisse's Policies for Managing Conflicts of Interest in connection with Investment Research: http://www.csfb.com/research-and-
analytics/disclaimer/managing_conflicts_disclaimer.html
Credit Suisse does not provide any tax advice. Any statement herein regarding any US federal tax is not intended or written to be used, and cannot
be used, by any taxpayer for the purposes of avoiding any penalties.

Price Target: (12 months) for Victrex (VCTX.L)


Method: Our Victrex target price is £24/share - this is the average of our SOTP (£22.53) and DCF (£25.15). We value Victrex on 15.6x 2015
EBITDA and 14.6x 2016 EBITDA (a 50% premium to peers). Our DCF valuation is based on a WACC of 7.7% and 10% growth rate in the
mid-term (12.5 years).
Risk: Key risks to our target price include: 1) de/re stocking cycles, 2) impact from Oil & Gas markets, 3) Currency, 4) Change to Victrex's
competitive position.

Please refer to the firm's disclosure website at https://rave.credit-suisse.com/disclosures for the definitions of abbreviations typically used in the
target price method and risk sections.
See the Companies Mentioned section for full company names
The subject company (SOLB.BR, AIR.PA, BA.N, GM.N, SYK.N, ZMH.N) currently is, or was during the 12-month period preceding the date of
distribution of this report, a client of Credit Suisse.
Credit Suisse provided investment banking services to the subject company (SOLB.BR, BA.N, GM.N, ZMH.N) within the past 12 months.
Credit Suisse provided non-investment banking services to the subject company (AIR.PA, GM.N) within the past 12 months
Credit Suisse has managed or co-managed a public offering of securities for the subject company (BA.N, GM.N, ZMH.N) within the past 12 months.
Credit Suisse has received investment banking related compensation from the subject company (SOLB.BR, BA.N, GM.N, ZMH.N) within the past 12
months
Credit Suisse expects to receive or intends to seek investment banking related compensation from the subject company (VCTX.L, SOLB.BR,
CRDA.L, AIR.PA, BA.N, GM.N, SYK.N, ZMH.N) within the next 3 months.
Credit Suisse has received compensation for products and services other than investment banking services from the subject company (AIR.PA,
GM.N) within the past 12 months
As of the end of the preceding month, Credit Suisse beneficially own 1% or more of a class of common equity securities of (CRDA.L, BASFn.DE).
Credit Suisse has a material conflict of interest with the subject company (SOLB.BR) . CS is acting as exclusive financial advisor to Solvay SA on its
Eco Services sale to affiliates of CCMP Capital Advisors LLC
Credit Suisse has a material conflict of interest with the subject company (ZMH.N) . Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC is acting as financial advisor
to Zimmer Holdings Inc. (NYSE and SIX: ZMH on its announced acquisition of Biomet Inc.

For other important disclosures concerning companies featured in this report, including price charts, please visit the website at https://rave.credit-
suisse.com/disclosures or call +1 (877) 291-2683.

Important Regional Disclosures


Singapore recipients should contact Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch for any matters arising from this research report.
The analyst(s) involved in the preparation of this report have not visited the material operations of the subject company (VCTX.L, SOLB.BR, CRDA.L,
EVKn.DE, AIR.PA, BA.N, GM.N, SYK.N, ZMH.N, BASFn.DE, DAIGn.DE) within the past 12 months

Victrex (VCTX.L) 47
13 May 2015

Restrictions on certain Canadian securities are indicated by the following abbreviations: NVS--Non-Voting shares; RVS--Restricted Voting Shares;
SVS--Subordinate Voting Shares.
Individuals receiving this report from a Canadian investment dealer that is not affiliated with Credit Suisse should be advised that this report may not
contain regulatory disclosures the non-affiliated Canadian investment dealer would be required to make if this were its own report.
For Credit Suisse Securities (Canada), Inc.'s policies and procedures regarding the dissemination of equity research, please visit https://www.credit-
suisse.com/sites/disclaimers-ib/en/canada-research-policy.html.
The following disclosed European company/ies have estimates that comply with IFRS: (SOLB.BR, CRDA.L, AIR.PA, BASFn.DE, DAIGn.DE).
Credit Suisse has acted as lead manager or syndicate member in a public offering of securities for the subject company (SOLB.BR, BA.N, GM.N,
ZMH.N, BASFn.DE) within the past 3 years.
As of the date of this report, Credit Suisse acts as a market maker or liquidity provider in the equities securities that are the subject of this report.
Principal is not guaranteed in the case of equities because equity prices are variable.
Commission is the commission rate or the amount agreed with a customer when setting up an account or at any time after that.
To the extent this is a report authored in whole or in part by a non-U.S. analyst and is made available in the U.S., the following are important
disclosures regarding any non-U.S. analyst contributors: The non-U.S. research analysts listed below (if any) are not registered/qualified as research
analysts with FINRA. The non-U.S. research analysts listed below may not be associated persons of CSSU and therefore may not be subject to the
NASD Rule 2711 and NYSE Rule 472 restrictions on communications with a subject company, public appearances and trading securities held by a
research analyst account.
Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited ............................................................................... Joseph Bradley ; Mathew Waugh ; Chris Counihan

Important Credit Suisse HOLT Disclosures


With respect to the analysis in this report based on the Credit Suisse HOLT methodology, Credit Suisse certifies that (1) the views expressed in this
report accurately reflect the Credit Suisse HOLT methodology and (2) no part of the Firm’s compensation was, is, or will be directly related to the
specific views disclosed in this report.
The Credit Suisse HOLT methodology does not assign ratings to a security. It is an analytical tool that involves use of a set of proprietary
quantitative algorithms and warranted value calculations, collectively called the Credit Suisse HOLT valuation model, that are consistently applied to
all the companies included in its database. Third-party data (including consensus earnings estimates) are systematically translated into a number of
default algorithms available in the Credit Suisse HOLT valuation model. The source financial statement, pricing, and earnings data provided by
outside data vendors are subject to quality control and may also be adjusted to more closely measure the underlying economics of firm performance.
The adjustments provide consistency when analyzing a single company across time, or analyzing multiple companies across industries or national
borders. The default scenario that is produced by the Credit Suisse HOLT valuation model establishes the baseline valuation for a security, and a
user then may adjust the default variables to produce alternative scenarios, any of which could occur.
Additional information about the Credit Suisse HOLT methodology is available on request.
The Credit Suisse HOLT methodology does not assign a price target to a security. The default scenario that is produced by the Credit Suisse HOLT
valuation model establishes a warranted price for a security, and as the third-party data are updated, the warranted price may also change. The
default variable may also be adjusted to produce alternative warranted prices, any of which could occur.
CFROI®, HOLT, HOLTfolio, ValueSearch, AggreGator, Signal Flag and “Powered by HOLT” are trademarks or service marks or registered
trademarks or registered service marks of Credit Suisse or its affiliates in the United States and other countries. HOLT is a corporate performance
and valuation advisory service of Credit Suisse.

For Credit Suisse disclosure information on other companies mentioned in this report, please visit the website at https://rave.credit-
suisse.com/disclosures or call +1 (877) 291-2683.

Victrex (VCTX.L) 48
13 May 2015

References in this report to Credit Suisse include all of the subsidiaries and affiliates of Credit Suisse operating under its investment banking division. For more information on our structure, please use the
following link: https://www.credit-suisse.com/who_we_are/en/This report may contain material that is not directed to, or intended for distribution to or use by, any person or entity who is a citizen or resident of
or located in any locality, state, country or other jurisdiction where such distribution, publication, availability or use would be contrary to law or regulation or which would subject Credit Suisse AG or its affiliates
("CS") to any registration or licensing requirement within such jurisdiction. All material presented in this report, unless specifically indicated otherwise, is under copyright to CS. None of the material, nor its
content, nor any copy of it, may be altered in any way, transmitted to, copied or distributed to any other party, without the prior express written permission of CS. All trademarks, service marks and logos used
in this report are trademarks or service marks or registered trademarks or service marks of CS or its affiliates. The information, tools and material presented in this report are provided to you for information
purposes only and are not to be used or considered as an offer or the solicitation of an offer to sell or to buy or subscribe for securities or other financial instruments. CS may not have taken any steps to
ensure that the securities referred to in this report are suitable for any particular investor. CS will not treat recipients of this report as its customers by virtue of their receiving this report. The investments and
services contained or referred to in this report may not be suitable for you and it is recommended that you consult an independent investment advisor if you are in doubt about such investments or investment
services. Nothing in this report constitutes investment, legal, accounting or tax advice, or a representation that any investment or strategy is suitable or appropriate to your individual circumstances, or
otherwise constitutes a personal recommendation to you. CS does not advise on the tax consequences of investments and you are advised to contact an independent tax adviser. Please note in particular
that the bases and levels of taxation may change. Information and opinions presented in this report have been obtained or derived from sources believed by CS to be reliable, but CS makes no representation
as to their accuracy or completeness. CS accepts no liability for loss arising from the use of the material presented in this report, except that this exclusion of liability does not apply to the extent that such
liability arises under specific statutes or regulations applicable to CS. This report is not to be relied upon in substitution for the exercise of independent judgment. CS may have issued, and may in the future
issue, other communications that are inconsistent with, and reach different conclusions from, the information presented in this report. Those communications reflect the different assumptions, views and
analytical methods of the analysts who prepared them and CS is under no obligation to ensure that such other communications are brought to the attention of any recipient of this report. Some investments
referred to in this report will be offered solely by a single entity and in the case of some investments solely by CS, or an associate of CS or CS may be the only market maker in such investments. Past
performance should not be taken as an indication or guarantee of future performance, and no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made regarding future performance. Information, opinions and
estimates contained in this report reflect a judgment at its original date of publication by CS and are subject to change without notice. The price, value of and income from any of the securities or financial
instruments mentioned in this report can fall as well as rise. The value of securities and financial instruments is subject to exchange rate fluctuation that may have a positive or adverse effect on the price or
income of such securities or financial instruments. Investors in securities such as ADR's, the values of which are influenced by currency volatility, effectively assume this risk. Structured securities are complex
instruments, typically involve a high degree of risk and are intended for sale only to sophisticated investors who are capable of understanding and assuming the risks involved. The market value of any
structured security may be affected by changes in economic, financial and political factors (including, but not limited to, spot and forward interest and exchange rates), time to maturity, market conditions and
volatility, and the credit quality of any issuer or reference issuer. Any investor interested in purchasing a structured product should conduct their own investigation and analysis of the product and consult with
their own professional advisers as to the risks involved in making such a purchase. Some investments discussed in this report may have a high level of volatility. High volatility investments may experience
sudden and large falls in their value causing losses when that investment is realised. Those losses may equal your original investment. Indeed, in the case of some investments the potential losses may
exceed the amount of initial investment and, in such circumstances, you may be required to pay more money to support those losses. Income yields from investments may fluctuate and, in consequence,
initial capital paid to make the investment may be used as part of that income yield. Some investments may not be readily realisable and it may be difficult to sell or realise those investments, similarly it may
prove difficult for you to obtain reliable information about the value, or risks, to which such an investment is exposed. This report may provide the addresses of, or contain hyperlinks to, websites. Except to the
extent to which the report refers to website material of CS, CS has not reviewed any such site and takes no responsibility for the content contained therein. Such address or hyperlink (including addresses or
hyperlinks to CS's own website material) is provided solely for your convenience and information and the content of any such website does not in any way form part of this document. Accessing such website
or following such link through this report or CS's website shall be at your own risk. This report is issued and distributed in Europe (except Switzerland) by Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited, One Cabot
Square, London E14 4QJ, England, which is authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority. This report is being
distributed in Germany by Credit Suisse Securities (Europe) Limited Niederlassung Frankfurt am Main regulated by the Bundesanstalt fuer Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht ("BaFin"). This report is being
distributed in the United States and Canada by Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC; in Switzerland by Credit Suisse AG; in Brazil by Banco de Investimentos Credit Suisse (Brasil) S.A or its affiliates; in Mexico
by Banco Credit Suisse (México), S.A. (transactions related to the securities mentioned in this report will only be effected in compliance with applicable regulation); in Japan by Credit Suisse Securities (Japan)
Limited, Financial Instruments Firm, Director-General of Kanto Local Finance Bureau (Kinsho) No. 66, a member of Japan Securities Dealers Association, The Financial Futures Association of Japan, Japan
Investment Advisers Association, Type II Financial Instruments Firms Association; elsewhere in Asia/ Pacific by whichever of the following is the appropriately authorised entity in the relevant jurisdiction:
Credit Suisse (Hong Kong) Limited, Credit Suisse Equities (Australia) Limited, Credit Suisse Securities (Thailand) Limited, regulated by the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission, Thailand,
having registered address at 990 Abdulrahim Place, 27th Floor, Unit 2701, Rama IV Road, Silom, Bangrak, Bangkok 10500, Thailand, Tel. +66 2614 6000, Credit Suisse Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd,
Credit Suisse AG, Singapore Branch, Credit Suisse Securities (India) Private Limited (CIN no. U67120MH1996PTC104392) regulated by the Securities and Exchange Board of India (registration Nos.
INB230970637; INF230970637; INB010970631; INF010970631), having registered address at 9th Floor, Ceejay House, Dr.A.B. Road, Worli, Mumbai - 18, India, T- +91-22 6777 3777, Credit Suisse
Securities (Europe) Limited, Seoul Branch, Credit Suisse AG, Taipei Securities Branch, PT Credit Suisse Securities Indonesia, Credit Suisse Securities (Philippines ) Inc., and elsewhere in the world by the
relevant authorised affiliate of the above. Research on Taiwanese securities produced by Credit Suisse AG, Taipei Securities Branch has been prepared by a registered Senior Business Person. Research
provided to residents of Malaysia is authorised by the Head of Research for Credit Suisse Securities (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd, to whom they should direct any queries on +603 2723 2020. This report has been
prepared and issued for distribution in Singapore to institutional investors, accredited investors and expert investors (each as defined under the Financial Advisers Regulations) only, and is also distributed by
Credit Suisse AG, Singapore branch to overseas investors (as defined under the Financial Advisers Regulations). By virtue of your status as an institutional investor, accredited investor, expert investor or
overseas investor, Credit Suisse AG, Singapore branch is exempted from complying with certain compliance requirements under the Financial Advisers Act, Chapter 110 of Singapore (the "FAA"), the
Financial Advisers Regulations and the relevant Notices and Guidelines issued thereunder, in respect of any financial advisory service which Credit Suisse AG, Singapore branch may provide to you. This
information is being distributed by Credit Suisse AG, Dubai Branch, duly licensed and regulated by the Dubai Financial Services Authority (DFSA), and is directed at Professional Clients or Market
Counterparties only, as defined by the DFSA. The financial products or financial services to which the information relates will only be made available to a client who meets the regulatory criteria to be a
Professional Client or Market Counterparty only, as defined by the DFSA, and is not intended for any other person. This research may not conform to Canadian disclosure requirements. In jurisdictions where
CS is not already registered or licensed to trade in securities, transactions will only be effected in accordance with applicable securities legislation, which will vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction and may require
that the trade be made in accordance with applicable exemptions from registration or licensing requirements. Non-U.S. customers wishing to effect a transaction should contact a CS entity in their local
jurisdiction unless governing law permits otherwise. U.S. customers wishing to effect a transaction should do so only by contacting a representative at Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC in the U.S. Please
note that this research was originally prepared and issued by CS for distribution to their market professional and institutional investor customers. Recipients who are not market professional or institutional
investor customers of CS should seek the advice of their independent financial advisor prior to taking any investment decision based on this report or for any necessary explanation of its contents. This
research may relate to investments or services of a person outside of the UK or to other matters which are not authorised by the Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the Financial Conduct
Authority and the Prudential Regulation Authority or in respect of which the protections of the Prudential Regulation Authority and Financial Conduct Authority for private customers and/or the UK
compensation scheme may not be available, and further details as to where this may be the case are available upon request in respect of this report. CS may provide various services to US municipal entities
or obligated persons ("municipalities"), including suggesting individual transactions or trades and entering into such transactions. Any services CS provides to municipalities are not viewed as "advice" within
the meaning of Section 975 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. CS is providing any such services and related information solely on an arm's length basis and not as an
advisor or fiduciary to the municipality. In connection with the provision of the any such services, there is no agreement, direct or indirect, between any municipality (including the officials, management,
employees or agents thereof) and CS for CS to provide advice to the municipality. Municipalities should consult with their financial, accounting and legal advisors regarding any such services provided by CS.
In addition, CS is not acting for direct or indirect compensation to solicit the municipality on behalf of an unaffiliated broker, dealer, municipal securities dealer, municipal advisor, or investment adviser for the
purpose of obtaining or retaining an engagement by the municipality for or in connection with Municipal Financial Products, the issuance of municipal securities, or of an investment adviser to provide
investment advisory services to or on behalf of the municipality. If this report is being distributed by a financial institution other than Credit Suisse AG, or its affiliates, that financial institution is solely responsible
for distribution. Clients of that institution should contact that institution to effect a transaction in the securities mentioned in this report or require further information. This report does not constitute investment
advice by Credit Suisse to the clients of the distributing financial institution, and neither Credit Suisse AG, its affiliates, and their respective officers, directors and employees accept any liability whatsoever for
any direct or consequential loss arising from their use of this report or its content. Principal is not guaranteed. Commission is the commission rate or the amount agreed with a customer when setting up an
account or at any time after that.
Copyright © 2015 CREDIT SUISSE AG and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Investment principal on bonds can be eroded depending on sale price or market price. In addition, there are bonds on which investment principal can
be eroded due to changes in redemption amounts. Care is required when investing in such instruments.
When you purchase non-listed Japanese fixed income securities (Japanese government bonds, Japanese municipal bonds, Japanese government guaranteed bonds, Japanese corporate bonds) from CS
as a seller, you will be requested to pay the purchase price only.

XX6555EU.doc
Victrex (VCTX.L) 49

You might also like