Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Article On Status of Laws On Marital Rape in India
Article On Status of Laws On Marital Rape in India
What is Rape?
IPC has defined Rape under Section 375 sexual intercourse with a
woman against her will, without her consent, by coercion,
misrepresentation or fraud or at a time when she has been intoxicated or
duped, or is of unsound mental health and in any case if she is under 18
years of age, under the circumstances falling under any of the following
seven descriptions:
Against her will and Without her consent,
With consent obtained under fear of death or hurt,
With consent given under misconception of the fact that the man is
her husband but the man knows that he is not her husband,
Consent given because of unsoundness of mind, intoxication, or
under influence of any stupefying or unwholesome substance,
With a woman under 18 years of age with or without consent.
What is Marital Rape?
Marital rape is the act of sexual intercourse with one's spouse without
the spouse's consent. The lack of consent is the essential element and
need not involve physical violence. Marital rape is not an offence in
India. Section 375, the provision of rape in IPC, mentions as its
exception clause- “Sexual intercourse by man with his own wife, the
wife not being under 15 years of age, is not rape.” Hence marital rape is
viewed as a rape just if the spouse is under 15 years old, and the
seriousness of punishment is milder. There is no lawful security agreed
to the spouse after the age of 15, which is against human rights
directions.
2. Inconsistency in Law
In the Chhattisgarh High Court, a wife framed multiple charges on
her husband. This included charges under Section 376, Section 377
and Section 498A. The Court bound by law had to dismiss the
husband on the ground of Exception 2 to Section 375.
4. Government's Stance
Today people are more aware of the atrocities associated with
marital rape. Despite this, the government of India has shown
repeated reluctance in criminalizing it.
In the Independent Thought v. Union of India Case (2017) also, the
government defended the marital rape exception. The government
argued that criminalizing marital rape is 'against the institution of
marriage'. It is against Indian culture and will destabilize the whole
institution of marriage. However, the judgment by the Supreme
Court in the case cleared the mist of misogyny hovering over the
government.
Conclusion
- By Yashi
(yashikumari.yk@gmail.co
m)