Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Project Proposal and Concept Note
Project Proposal and Concept Note
To view an official copy of the the Creative Commons Attribution Works 3.0 Unported License we build upon, visit
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0. This agreement officially states that:
You are free to:
• Share - to copy, distribute and transmit this document
• Remix - to adapt this document. We would appreciate receiving a copy of any changes that you have made to improve this
document.
Under the following conditions:
• Attribution: You must always give the original authors or publishing agencies credit for the document or picture you are using.
Disclaimer
The contents of the SSWM Toolbox reflect the opinions of the respective authors and not necessarily the official opinion of the funding or
supporting partner organisations.
Depending on the initial situations and respective local circumstances, there is no guarantee that single measures described in the toolbox
will make the local water and sanitation system more sustainable. The main aim of the SSWM Toolbox is to be a reference tool to provide
ideas for improving the local water and sanitation situation in a sustainable manner. Results depend largely on the respective situation
and the implementation and combination of the measures described. An in-depth analysis of respective advantages and disadvantages and
the suitability of the measure is necessary in every single case. We do not assume any responsibility for and make no warranty with
respect to the results that may be obtained from the use of the information provided.
Contents
Once the vision of the community has been defined and a long-term strategy
has been written, strategic objectives should be agreed, which will provide a
framework for planning future actions.
Strategic Future
Objectives Planning
Community’s Long-term Objective 1 Project 1
Vision Strategy
Objective 2 Project 2
Objective 3 Project 3
... ...
Objective N Project N
SOURCE: PHILIP, R., ANTON, B., BONJEAN, M., BROMLEY, J., COX, D., SMITS, S., SULLIVAN, C. A., VAN NIEKERK, K.,
CHONGUIÇA, E., MONGGAE, F., NYAGWAMBO, L., PULE, R., BERRAONDO LÓPEZ, M. (2008): Local Government and Integrated
Water Resources Management (IWRM) Part III: Engaging in IWRM – Practical Steps and Tools for Local Governments. Freiburg:
ICLEI European Secretariat GmbH.
Project Preparation and Financing 4
Find this presentation and more on: www.sswm.info.
Projects vary in scale, purpose and duration. Ideally in our SSWM approach,
they are to be initiated with the participation of the community, but it also
may be generated within an NGO or a municipality.
Small projects require modest inputs and produce tangible outputs within a
relatively short timeframe. At the other extreme, projects may require
substantial financial resources and only generate benefits in the long term.
Despite the difference in scale and nature of projects, there are aspects of
sound project management that are universal.
some financing programs, funding agencies require a concept note before the
submission of a full proposal.
Review carefully the Community Action Plan or the Vision Statement of the
Community.
The project design is one phase of the project cycle. It consists of two elements:
Project design is a result of both project planning and the project proposal. Both
steps are essential to forming a solid project design.
Desired Current
situation gap situation
need
Project
SOURCE: L. Barreto Dillon
Setting priorities:
out of all the goals to be achieved, priorities have to be set to decide which
project to carry out first. Priority problems falling into the scope of the
stakeholders, your organisation, the State policy and the donor shall be selected.
Stakeholders 3 1 2
State 2 1 3
Donor 3 2 1
Organisation 2 3 1
This means placing and organising the collected data and information in a logical
sequential easily understandable manner that breaks down the problem into
root and secondary causes; thus facilitates pinpointing the problem, the causes
and implications.
In order to do this, you should use the tool “Problem Tree Analysis”
Main Problem
The project should provide a detailed description of the size and characteristics of
the beneficiaries, target groups and final beneficiaries of the project.
The criteria for target group analysis may be ethnic composition, gender, age, etc.
Example:
Requirements of drafting
Characteristics: the project objective:
•Increase the number of families
•Specific •percentages or figures from village Z in quantity X who
•Measurable •place specified live in a clean garbage-free
environment within Y years.
•Applicable •target group specified
•Improve the water supply in
•Realistic •time-specific quantity X and quality Y for the
•Timely •positive desired state population of village Z in the next
N years.
Example of Results:
An indicator is the signal
indicating the achievement of the set
goal. An indicator is used to judge the
•Increase number of families
level of success, it is mostly a figure,
living in a clean garbage-free
percentage or ration. An indicator is the
environment.
unit measuring how far a certain result is
achieved using a benchmark or a standard, •Increased number of households
yet it doesn’t demonstrate the trend or connected to the water supply
the change. Example: system; and
-Number of new water taps in the village •Increased number of water taps
in the village.
Project Preparation and Financing 21
Find this presentation and more on: www.sswm.info.
Objective 1 Objective 2
SOURCE: NEBIU, B. (2002): Developing Skills of NGOs, Project Proposal Writing. Szentendre:
The Regional Environmental Centre for Central and Eastern Europe.
Therefore, the first sentences of a concept paper are very important. You
want the funding agency representatives or board members to continue
reading!
Project Preparation and Financing 24
Find this presentation and more on: www.sswm.info.
The length and the format for writing a concept note actually depend upon the
donor agency.
Usually donors do not have a format for a concept note as they have for a full
proposal.
2. Background: include your problem and its analysis, together with the
following two guiding questions:
•Why it is crucial to address the problem identified?
•What has already been done to solve the problem?
3. Objectives: they should relate to the more general aim as previously agreed
and entered into the local action plan. (Keep in mind the Project Tree!)
6. Beneficiaries and impacts: this section will be important for getting “buy-
in” from the donor. It should contain:
•The expected benefits, both in quantitative and qualitative terms, and when
and where they will occur.
•The underlying assumptions and the reasons why these benefits can be
expected for a specific group of beneficiaries.
•Considerations concerning how and by whom the impacts will be assessed.
● people
● travel costs
● vehicles
● equipment
● consumables and supplies
● Sub-contracts
“Direct costs are all those eligible costs which can be attributed directly to
the project and are identified by the beneficiary as such, in accordance with
its accounting principles and its usual internal rules”. Direct costs can be:
● Personnel costs: they should reflect the total remuneration, including
salaries plus social security charges (holiday pay, pension contribution, health
insurance, etc).
●Travel and subsistence allowances: first determine what travel expenses
the granting agency will allow, and then itemize the cost of each trip, e.g.,
round-trip airfare, lodging and meals, taxis, visa, etc.
●Vehicles: usually this cost will be included in the travel and subsistence
item.
●Durable equipment: any item which will retain its usefulness beyond the
grant period is considered capital equipment.
●Consumables and supplies: stationery, duplicating supplies,
typing/computing supplies, and software. SOURCE:
Indirect
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2009): Guide to Financial Issues relating to FP7
Actions. Seventh Framework Programme. URL:
ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/docs/financialguide_en.pdf
Project Preparation and Financing [Accessed: 08.05.2010] 33
Find this presentation and more on: www.sswm.info.
Indirect costs are all those eligible costs which cannot be identified by the
beneficiary as being directly attributed to the project, but which can be
identified and justified by its accounting system as being incurred in direct
relationship with the eligible direct costs attributed to the project.
Indirect costs, also called overheads, F&A and Facilities & Administrative Costs,
typically are costs of:
•operating and maintaining buildings (electricity/gas/water bills),
•grounds and equipment,
•depreciation,
•general and departmental administrative salaries and expenses
•library costs. SOURCE: EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2009): Guide to Financial Issues relating to FP7
Indirect Actions. Seventh Framework Programme. URL:
ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/docs/financialguide_en.pdf
[Accessed: 08.05.2010]
References
EUROPEAN COMMISSION (2009): Guide to Financial Issues relating to FP7 Indirect Actions. Seventh Framework Programme.
URL: ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/fp7/docs/financialguide_en.pdf
[Accessed: 08.05.2010]
NEBIU, B. (2002): Developing Skills of NGOs, Project Proposal Writing. Szentendre: The Regional Environmental Centre for
Central and Eastern Europe. URL: http://documents.rec.org/publications/ProposalWriting.pdf
[Accessed: 07.08.2010]
NETSSAF (2008): The NETSSAF Participatory Planning Approach. A Tutorial for Sustainable Sanitation. URL:
http://www.netssaftutorial.com [Accessed: 14.05.2010]
PHILIP, R., ANTON, B., BONJEAN, M., BROMLEY, J., COX, D., SMITS, S., SULLIVAN, C. A., VAN NIEKERK, K., CHONGUIÇA, E.,
MONGGAE, F., NYAGWAMBO, L., PULE, R., BERRAONDO LÓPEZ, M. (2008): Local Government and Integrated Water Resources
Management (IWRM) Part III: Engaging in IWRM – Practical Steps and Tools for Local Governments. Freiburg: ICLEI European
Secretariat GmbH.
PPIAF –PUBLIC-PRIVATE INFRASTRUCTURE ADVISORY FACILITY- (2010): What are Public-Private Partnerships. URL:
http://www.ppiaf.org [Accessed on 14.05.2010]
SONI, P. (2005): Solution Exchange for WES-NET India. WES-NET India -Water & Environmental Sanitation Network-. URL:
http://www.solutionexchange-un.net.in/environment/cr-public/cr-se-wes-29070501-public.pdf
[Accessed on 16.05.2010]
TRÈMOLET, S., PEREZ, E. and KOSLKY, P. (2007): WSP Sanitation Financing Study. Methodological Note. URL:
http://www.susana.org/images/documents/07-cap-dev/a-material-topic-wg/wg02/tremolet-et-al-2007a-methodological-
note-sanitation-wsp-en.pdf
[Accessed on 16.05.2010]
Project Preparation and Financing 36
“Linking up Sustainable Sanitation,
Water Management & Agriculture”
SSWM is an initiative
supported by:
Compiled by: