Answer Summary (Nov.

5, 2022, Saturday)

 Plaintiffs Veronica, Charmaine, and Genelyn, filed a complaint

against defendants Hazel, Pauline, and Kaye Lucero for Forcible
Entry.

 The defendants did not violate the law for allegedly committing
forcible entry but are legal tenants of the land in question and have
faithfully paid their rent due on time. (Contract of lease) & (Receipts
of payment of rent)

 After the plaintiff demanded to vacate the property, the plaintiff failed
to return the rent deposit to the defendants. The defendants provided
a demand letter but were ignored by the plaintiffs. (Demand letter)

 Concerning the fence, the defendants sent the owners a fencing

notice, and Darwin Alamo, Stephen Ostria, and Chano Valenzuela
were workers of the defendants for the maintenance of the garden of
the rented land. (Fencing notice) (Explaining the bolo saw by witness,
Bea)

 Bea, a witness of the plaintiffs, is not credible since her house is

located 2 hectares away from the property rented by the defendants.
(What proof to show that Bea is not a credible witness, google maps?)

 The argument arose when Manuel Bubon (witness), another tenant of

the plaintiffs, was romantically involved with defendant Hazel
Guiriba. Veronica was previously romantically linked to Manuel
Bubon, and their relationship was inconsistent in the span of
_______.

Manuel Bubon developed feelings for Hazel Guiriba. Veronica did not
favor the link between Manuel and Hazel; therefore, this complaint.
o Screenshots of the conversations between Veronica and Hazel.
Veronica threatening the defendants to vacate the property
rented if Hazel does not leave Manuel
o Screenshots of conversations of Manuel and Veronica proving
that they were romantically linked)