Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Note: This study material has been prepared for the purpose
of classroom discussions only.
The Supply Chain View
provide vital resources and inputs to the core processes
Support Processes
New
service/ product Customer
relationship
External customers
development
External suppliers
management
Supplier Order
relationship fulfillment
process process
Distributor
Manufacturing Cycle
Manufacturer
Procurement Cycle
Supplier
Clearly specifies the roles and responsibilities
of each member and the desired outcome
Push/Pull View of Supply Chains
Procurement, Customer Order
Manufacturing and Cycle
Replenishment cycles
Customer
Order Arrives
1-10
Supply Chain Macro Processes in a
Firm
• Strategic decisions relating to supply chain design –
how supply chain processes relate to customer orders
• The relative proportion of push and pull processes can
have an impact on supply chain performance
• Supply chain processes discussed in the two views can
be classified into
– Customer Relationship Management (CRM)
– Internal Supply Chain Management (ISCM)
– Supplier Relationship Management (SRM)
• Integration among the above three macro processes is
critical for effective and successful supply chain
management
1-11
Support Processes
Capital acquisition Financial resources for the organization to do
its work and to execute its strategy
Budgeting Deciding how funds will be allocated over a
period of time
Recruitment and hiring The acquisition of people
Ordering Costs
ROP
Safety stock
Safety stock reduces risk of LT Time
stockout during lead time
Service Level
• Product with limited useful life (perishables)
• Cunderstocking = Revenue per unit – Cost per unit
• Coverstocking = Original cost per unit – Salvage value per unit
• Service Level = Cu/(Cu+Co)
• For uniform distribution [a,b]: optimal stocking level = a +
SL*(b-a)
• For uniform distribution: optimal stocking level = mean
demand + zSL*σ
• For discrete stocking levels – ratio Cs/(Cs+Ce) may not
coincide with a feasible stocking level – chose next higher
level
Example
• Demand for long-stemmed red roses at a
small flower shop can be approximated using
a Poisson distribution that has a mean of four
dozen per day. Profit on the roses is $3 per
dozen. Leftover flowers are marked down and
sold at a loss of $2 per dozen. Assume that all
marked-down flowers are sold. What is the
optimum stocking level?
Solution
• Cu = $3
• Co = $2
• SL = 3/5=0.6
• Poisson distribution for a mean of 4
Demand (dozen per day) Probability Cummulative Probability
0 0.02 0.02
1 0.07 0.09
2 0.15 0.24
3 0.20 0.43
4 0.20 0.63
5 0.16 0.79
Determinants of the Reorder Point
• The rate of demand
• The lead time
• Demand and/or lead time variability
• Stockout risk (safety stock)
Service level
Risk of
a stockout
Probability of
no stockout
ROP Quantity
Expected
demand Safety
stock
0 z z-scale
Example: Data with demand during
lead time
• Expected lead time demand = 50
• σ =5
dLT
• Risk = 3%
• Service level = 1-0.03 = 0.97
• Z = +1.88
• ROP = 50+9.4 = 59.4
Variability in demand during the
period and lead time
• If only demand is variable
– σ = σ *sqrt(LT)
dLT d
d 33
sd 3
LT 5 D during LT 165
s^2LT 0.95
s^2dLT 1079.55 32.86
Hi Local FG
Mix
Regional FG
Local WIP
Cost Central FG
Central WIP
Number of Facilities
Cost Buildup as a Function of Facilities
Total Costs
Percent Service
Cost of Operations
Level Within
Promised Time
Facility cost
Inventory
Transportation
Labor
Number of Facilities
A Framework for Global Site Location
Competitive STRATEGY GLOBAL COMPETITION
PHASE I
Supply Chain
INTERNAL CONSTRAINTS Strategy
Capital, growth strategy, TARIFFS AND TAX
existing network INCENTIVES
PHASE III
Desirable Sites AVAILABLE
INFRASTRUCTURE
PRODUCTION METHODS
Skill needs, response time
D=80 D=96
p=$1.32 p=$0.97
0.25 D=64
p=$1.45
D=80
p=$1.08 D=64
p=$1.19
D=64
p=$0.97
Logistics Example
• Assumption: Trips Logistics must satisfy a demand
• From node D=120, p=$1.32 in Period 1, there are four possible
states in Period 2
• Evaluate the expected profit in Period 2 over all four states
possible from node D=120, p=$1.32 in Period 1 to be
EP(D=120,p=1.32,1) = 0.25xP(D=144,p=1.45,2) +
0.25xP(D=144,p=1.19,2) +
0.25xP(D=96,p=1.45,2) +
0.25xP(D=96,p=1.19,2)
= 0.25x(-33,120)+0.25x4,320+0.25x(-22,080)+0.25x2,880
= -$12,000
Logistics Example
• The present value of this expected value in Period 1 is
PVEP(D=120, p=1.32,1) = EP(D=120,p=1.32,1) / (1+k)
= -$12,000 / (1+0.1)
= -$10,909
• The total expected profit P(D=120,p=1.32,1) at node
D=120,p=1.32 in Period 1 is the sum of the profit in Period 1 at
this node, plus the present value of future expected profits
possible from this node
P(D=120,p=1.32,1) = [(120,000x1.22)-(120,000x1.32)] +
PVEP(D=120,p=1.32,1)
= -$12,000 + (-$10,909) = -$22,909
Logistics Example
• For Period 0, the total profit P(D=100,p=120,0) is the sum of
the profit in Period 0 and the present value of the expected
profit over the four nodes in Period 1
EP(D=100,p=1.20,0) = 0.25xP(D=120,p=1.32,1) +
0.25xP(D=120,p=1.08,1) +
0.25xP(D=96,p=1.32,1) +
0.25xP(D=96,p=1.08,1)
= 0.25x(-22,909)+0.25x32,073+0.25x(-15,273)+0.25x21,382
= $3,818
PVEP(D=100,p=1.20,0) = EP(D=100,p=1.20,0) / (1+k)
= $3,818 / (1 + 0.1) = $3,471
Logistics Example
P(D=100,p=1.20,0) = 100,000x1.22-
100,000x1.20 + PVEP(D=100,p=1.20,0)
= $2,000 + $3,471 = $5,471
• Therefore, the expected NPV of not signing the
lease and obtaining all warehouse space from
the spot market is given by NPV(Spot Market) =
$5,471
• Using the same approach for the lease option,
NPV(Lease) = $38,364
Evaluating Flexibility Using Decision Trees
• Decision tree methodology can be used to evaluate flexibility within the
supply chain
• Suppose the manager at Trips Logistics has been offered a contract
where, for an upfront payment of $10,000, the company will have the
flexibility of using between 60,000 sq. ft. and 100,000 sq. ft. of
warehouse space at $1 per sq. ft. per year. Trips must pay $60,000 for
the first 60,000 sq. ft. and can then use up to 40,000 sq. ft. on demand
at $1 per sq. ft. as needed.
• Using the same approach as before, the expected profit of this option is
$56,725
• The value of flexibility is the difference between the expected present
value of the flexible option and the expected present value of the
inflexible options
• The flexible option has an expected present value $8,361 greater than
the inflexible lease option (including the upfront $10,000 payment)