Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Defining Culture
A culturally diverse workforce has long been an important reliance on the tourism and hospitality industry.
As defined in the Merriam-Webster dictionary, culture pertains to the customary beliefs, social forms, and
material traits of a racial, religious, or social group. It also refers to a set of shared attitudes, values, goals,
and practices that characterizes an institution or organization.
Culture is the social glue that helps hold the organization together by providing standards for what
employees should say and do. It is a sense-making, control mechanism that guides and shapes employees’
attitudes and behavior.
Culture is constantly created and changed as groups of people socially interact with one another, allowing
cohesion between people from distinct organizations or departments, work as a connection factor. Inter-
organizational relationships, and organizational cultures, rely on trust, commitment, communication,
learning, ways to perceive and cope with reality, and shared meanings and symbols (De Anca & Vasquez,
2007).
Organizational culture represents a perception that the organization’s members hold in common. The
dominant culture expresses the core values (the primary or dominant values accepted throughout the
organization) that gives the organization its distinct personality. For instance, Zappos’ (an online shoe and
clothing retailer based in Las Vegas, Nevada, United States) culture values customer care and dedication over
speed and efficiency, which explains Zappos executives and employees’ behaviors (Robbins & Judge, 2018).
In addition to each organization’s dominant culture, subcultures (mini cultures within an organization,
typically defined by department designations and geographical separation) tend to develop in large
organizations in response to common problems or experiences a group of members faces in the same
department or location. Most large organizations have a dominant culture and numerous subcultures. It is
the shared meaning aspect of culture that makes it a potent device for guiding and shaping organizational
behavior.
Service Culture
It is possible to differentiate between strong and weak cultures. If most employees (responding to surveys,
for instance) have the same opinions about the organization’s mission and values, the culture is strong; if
opinions vary widely, it is weak.
In a strong culture, the organization’s core values are both intensely held and widely shared. The more
members who accept the core values and the greater their commitment, the stronger the culture and the
greater its influence on member behavior. A weak culture exemplifies otherwise. The culture that should be
existing in the tourism and hospitality industry is known as service culture. This culture anticipates guests’
needs and renders services accordingly before they ask for it. Guest satisfaction must be the topmost priority
for any tourism and hospitality professional.
Functions of Culture
Culture defines the rules of the game in an organization.
It has a boundary-defining role: it creates distinctions between organizations.
It conveys a sense of identity for organization members.
It facilitates commitment to something larger than self-interest.
It enhances the stability of the social system.
A strong culture supported by formal rules and regulations ensures employees will act in a relatively uniform
and predictable way. Today’s trend towards dispersed organizations makes culture more important than
ever, and ironically more difficult at the same time. When formal authority and control systems are reduced,
the culture’s shared meaning can point everyone in the same direction.
04 Handout 1 *Property of STI
student.feedback@sti.edu Page 1 of 5
TH2010
In virtual organizations (institutions that work remotely), the lack of frequent face-to-face contact makes
establishing a common set of norms very difficult. Strong leadership that fosters a strong culture by
frequently communicating about common goals and priorities is necessary to make organizations more
adaptive and innovative in the tourism and hospitality industry.
Organizational Climate
Organizational climate refers to the shared perceptions that organizational members have about their
organization and work environment. This aspect of culture is like team spirit at the organizational level.
When everyone has the same general feelings about what’s important or how well things are working, the
effect of these attitudes will be more than the sum of the individual parts. A positive organizational climate
has been linked to higher customer satisfaction and organizational financial performance, as well.
Dimensions of organizational climate have been studied, including innovation, creativity, communication,
warmth and support, involvement, safety, justice, diversity, and customer service. There are several findings
managers can use to improve their organizational design and team-building plans (Robbins & Judge, 2018).
For instance, a new airline or hotel employee who comes across a diverse organizational climate will feel
more comfortable collaborating with coworkers regardless of their demographic backgrounds. The
organizational climate also influences the habits people adopt. If there is a safety climate, everyone wears
safety gear and follows safety procedures even if individually, they would not normally think very often
about being safe. Studies have shown that a safety climate decreases the number of documented injuries on
the job, like those in kitchens or aircraft.
Cultural Categories and Dimensions
In a study by Fons Trompenaars (a Dutch organizational theorist, management consultant, and author in the
field of cross-cultural communication), he conceived culture as to how organizations resolved a range of
universal problems that could be divided into three (3) categories: a) those that arise from relationships with
other people, b) those that arise from the passing of time, and c) those related to the environment.
Problems Arising from Relationships with Other People
The concept of self: individualism versus collectivism
One of the basic cultural differences in society is the extent of individualism compared to collectivism.
o In an individualistic culture, the individual puts their needs before those of the group. For an
individualistic person, the best form of guaranteeing the group’s welfare is to make its members
self-sufficient. The general values appreciated by the group are those related to self-sufficiency
and self-confidence. In general, the individuals tend to have a distant behavior at the emotional
and psychological level.
o In a collectivist culture, a person’s identity depends on the individual’s role in the group,
whether the group is represented by the family, the team, work, and the like. The success and
survival of the group guarantee the welfare of its members. The individual normally puts the
group’s needs and feelings before their own, believing this to be the best way to ensure their
survival. Interdependence and harmony among members of the group are the most appreciated
values. The group members are psychologically and emotionally close, but distant to those who
do not belong.
The concept of obligations: universalism versus particularism
When obligations to family and friends interfere with social obligations, individuals belonging to
different cultures normally position themselves at one or the other end of the spectrum ranging from
particularism to universalism.
References:
Braedel-Kühner, C. & Müller, A.P. (2016). Re-thinking diversity: Multiple approaches in theory, media, communities, and managerial
practice. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden.
De Anca, C. & Vasquez, A. (2007). Managing diversity in the global organization: Creating new business values. Palgrave Macmillan.
Merriam-Webster Dictionary (2020). Culture. Retrieved 05 May 2020, from https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/culture.
Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. (2018). Essentials of organizational behavior (14th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.
Although organizations use heroes, stories, symbols, and ceremonies to convey important values and
beliefs, slogans are critical to level-2 culture. A slogan expresses key values. Slogans are part of
organizational mission statements, while a philosophy (e.g., FedEx’s philosophy of people-service-profit)
is a formal statement of values and beliefs.
Level 3: Assumptions. Assumptions are values and beliefs that are so deeply ingrained that they are
considered unquestionably true. Because assumptions are shared, they are rarely discussed. They serve
as an automatic pilot to guide behavior. People often feel threatened when assumptions are challenged.
If you question employees about why they do something or suggest a change, they often respond with
statements like, “That’s the way it’s always been done.” Assumptions are often the most stable and
enduring part of the culture and are difficult to change.
Notice that behavior is at the top of the diagram in Figure 1. Assumptions, values, and beliefs affect
behavior, not the other way around; in other words, cause and effect work from the bottom up.
Because organizational culture is based at least partly on assumptions, values, and beliefs, it is a powerful
force in controlling how people act within its boundaries. For instance, if the culture says that we value hard
work and productivity, an individual on one of the teams fails to do their part, work hard, and be productive,
then the other team members are quite likely to pressure that individual to conform to the culture or leave
the organization. Since assumptions, values, and beliefs are so strong, shirking individuals will most likely
change their actions to conform to those that the culture values.
Elements of Organizational Culture
Initial Elements
Initial elements are aspects that sustain and allow the beginning of the development of an inter-organizational
culture.
Shared symbols refer to any physical phenomenon to which people assign a name, meaning, or
value. Shared symbols and meanings are those common cultural elements on which relationships
start developing. They ease contact, improve interaction quality, and expand the sharing of ideas, as
service providers and customers have, to some degree, similar perspectives to understand the world
and the businesses.
Openness to new ideas increases the chance to better understand the counterpart, despite different
values between the service providers and customers, because humbleness and interest in learning
with the other are present. Hence, it allows more openness to diversity because members from
different organizations realize the richness of solutions when interactions occur between them and
the importance of being open to different perspectives and interpretations of the world.
Frequency and quality of interactions allow deeper knowledge of the counterpart, and understand
that values, world visions, and means to solve problems are similar and different. When combined
with shared meanings and symbols, the frequency becomes more effective and more valued by their
counterparts. Once articulated with openness to new ideas, we will have more chances to deal with
constructive conflict because the focus is on solving the problem and satisfying market needs. In this
case, quality on how people interact and solve problems together enables better means to give
attention to others, because of reliability in actions increases. Problems are solved more
collaboratively once people know how the counterpart can help, which allows the existence of a
network of symbols and meanings across organizational boundaries.
Shared meanings and symbols, openness to new ideas, and frequency and quality of interactions allow an
inter-organizational culture to start its development. This occurs because parties have felt safe and have
shown optimism about the relationship’s future, developed through these interactions, which have led to
more similar new perspectives to understand the world.
Intermediate Elements
04 Handout 1 *Property of STI
student.feedback@sti.edu Page 7 of 5
TH2010
Role of Leadership
The culture that organizations are embedded in influences their views about leadership. Besides
organizational culture, there are two (2) other cultures that influence people in the workplace. These three
(3) are altogether referred to as cultures model. This model is not only based on organizational culture of
global businesses but also captures influences in local companies.
Personal culture is the shared combination of an individual’s traits, skills, and personality formed within the
context of his or her ethnic, racial, familial, and educational environments. Everyone has a unique personal
culture. National culture is a shared understanding that comes from the combination of beliefs, values,
attitudes, and behaviors that have provided the foundation for the heritage of a country. Although it is a
shared understanding, individuals within a nation still have a very wide range of beliefs about their nation.
For interactions within organizations, culture is a mix of personal, national, and organizational culture. Inter-
organizational culture occurs between participants from different organizations who share the same
meanings and symbols. Tourism and hospitality leaders must, then, respond to the following questions to
evaluate where the organization or workplace is in terms of organizational culture.
o How do leaders and people contribute to the development of inter-organizational culture?
o How should leaders and people, both closed and distant from relationships, be prepared for such inter-
organizational interactions?
Cultural Perspectives
Focusing on the importance of relationships, people must be reinforced, supported, inspired, and challenged
to realize what a relationship is and its implications to the totality of the organization. In relation to the three
(3) cultural perspectives of integration, differentiation, and fragmentation, leaders must be aware of their
role in the comprehension of these perspectives, the way these perspectives will affect people subordinated
to them, as well as their interactions between people from different organizational areas and companies
(Larentis, Antonello, & Slongo, 2019).
In connection with the perspective of integration (removes ambiguity by focusing people's attention on
unifying values and assumptions), when an organization decides to deal with cooperative relationships
and is aware of their features, the importance of the relationship is likely to be somehow already
present. Misunderstandings brought by non-shared meanings and symbols may cause disintegration.
Therefore, organizational leaders must initiate group conversations, meetings, and visits.
Shared meanings and symbols associated with the perspective of differentiation (have different views),
interpretation, and practices about inter-organizational relationships pose a challenge to the
organization. In such instances, visits and meetings can be venues for encouragement and support.
About the perspective of fragmentation (interrupts coordination processes in environments brought by
gaps or uncertainties), the role of leadership is to comprehend how such meanings and symbols interact
between organizations. This aims to guide people, considering the way relationships are supposed to
perform in the organization or to find out some practices and narratives, which may contribute to the
way top management teams make sense and interpret how relationships operate.
In all perspectives, attention shall be given to the new employees. Beyond the aspects of selection,
development, and appreciation, organizational leaders need to get involved in the rites associated with new
employees, and the way they will learn a new culture. Mentoring is another useful tool.
Mentoring is a relationship between two (2) individuals with the goal of professional and personal
development. The mentor is usually an experienced individual who shares knowledge, experience, and
advice with a less experienced person or mentee. New employees start learning an organizational culture
since their first day, and they will learn from the available resources and mentors, comparing and interacting
with their experiences and paths.
Inter-organizational Learning
Organizational performance and success are directly connected to the understanding of learning dynamics.
Relationship development, maintenance, and performance are based on people learning how to deal with
each other, understanding different positions, and acquiring more knowledge from facts and experiences.
Apart from trust, inter-organizational learning is one of the key factors for inter-organizational relationship
performance.
Inter-organizational learning is defined as a dynamic process that occurs in cooperative inter-organizational
relationships, in different structured and non-structured social spaces, which encourage learning situations,
described as learning episodes (Larentis, Antonello, & Slongo, 2019). Learning does not only occur in a
person’s mind, but also in their social interactions; it is not only a cognitive phenomenon, but also a cultural
and social one.
Situated learning puts thought and action into a specific a time and space. It means involving individuals,
environments, and activities to make learning complete. For instance, suppliers and service providers,
interacting to develop a new product or even to define how to improve service quality to final customers,
are learning, although not having a specific program to develop capabilities and improve tasks. This explains
how inter-organizational learning shows its cultural and social implications.
An important aspect of inter-organizational learning is the presence of dialogue. Dialogues work as
interactive joint learning processes, frequently spontaneously and without having rules, but limited by a
serious intention to achieve mutual understanding. As parties begin sharing information, a dialogue process
is being developed.
Dialogues constitute a specific element which will lead to interpretation or sense-making. Cultural meanings
will be generated, interpreted, and figured out. During the interactions, people have the opportunity to
learn, regardless of the lack of organizations’ actions and practices associated with learning.
Cultural Competence
There has been a great deal of focus on the global leadership competencies needed for success in the rapidly
changing global environment. The competencies needed for effective global leadership, whether
domestically in a multicultural environment or abroad, are similar. For leaders to be successful in
multicultural interactions, they must be globally literate.
To be globally literate means seeing, thinking, acting, and mobilizing in culturally mindful ways. Global
literacy is the sum of the attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, skills, and behaviors needed for success in today’s
multicultural, global economy (Connerley & Pedersen, 2005). It also means that leaders must possess the
following competencies:
Personal literacy – understanding and valuing oneself
Social literacy – engaging and challenging other people
Business literacy – focusing and mobilizing one’s organization
Cultural literacy – valuing and leveraging cultural differences
All these competencies are both interrelated and interdependent. Together they form the foundation for
global competence. How each of these literacies is expressed depends on the culture in which the leader is
working, living, and conducting business. The following characteristics are important in leading diverse
organizations successfully:
A personal, long-range vision that includes employees of different ethnic and cultural groups
An awareness of multicultural issues and broad knowledge of diversity dimensions
An openness to change in themselves by encouraging feedback from their employees, accepting
criticism, and showing a willingness to change their behavior
Mentoring and empowering those who are culturally different.
04 Handout 1 *Property of STI
student.feedback@sti.edu Page 10 of 5
TH2010
For leaders to be effective in multicultural environments, they must have the necessary awareness,
knowledge, and skills through training. This three-step approach is best known as multicultural
competencies:
Awareness – provides the basis for accurate opinions, attitudes, and assumptions. It presumes an
ability to compare alternative viewpoints accurately, relate or translate priorities in various cultural
settings, identify constraints and opportunities in each cultural context, and understand one’s
limitations.
A well-defined awareness is essential for leading and interacting with others. If the awareness stage
is overlooked in multicultural leadership training, then the knowledge and skills – however accurate
and effective – may be based on false assumptions. If training does not go beyond awareness
objectives, leaders will be frustrated because they can see the problems but cannot to change
anything about it. Developing awareness means objectively observing what is happening around and
receiving impressions from all the factors or influences surrounding the organization. This
information will then be used to determine what to expect the next time the organization is faced
with a similar situation.
Culturally skilled leaders have moved from being culturally unaware to being aware and sensitive to
their own cultural heritage and valuing and respecting differences. They can recognize the limits of
their competencies and expertise. They are comfortable with differences that exist between
themselves and others in terms of race, ethnicity, culture, and beliefs.
Knowledge. It provides the documentation and factual information necessary to move beyond
awareness toward effective and appropriate change in multicultural settings. Through accumulated
facts and information based on appropriate assumptions, it is possible to understand other cultures
from their own viewpoint (Connerley & Pedersen, 2005).
If knowledge is overlooked in training, then the cultural awareness and skill, however appropriate
and effective – will lack grounding in essential facts and information about the multicultural context,
and the resulting changes may be inappropriate. If, however, training does not go beyond the
collection of facts and information about other cultures, those interacting with the leader will be
overwhelmed by abstractions that may be true but will be impossible to apply in practice.
Culturally skilled leaders possess knowledge about their social impact on others. They are
knowledgeable about communication style differences, how their style may clash or foster
interactions with individuals from underrepresented groups, and how to anticipate the impact it may
have on others.
Skill. It provides the ability to build on awareness and apply knowledge toward effective change in
multicultural settings. Trained people will become skilled in planning, conducting, and evaluating the
multicultural contexts in their respective workplaces. They can assess the needs of other cultures,
work with interpreters and cultural informants, observe and understand behaviors of culturally
different people, and interact, advise, evaluate, and manage their tasks effectively in multicultural
settings.
Culturally skilled leaders seek educational, developmental, and training experience to improve their
understanding and effectiveness in working with culturally different individuals. Being able to
recognize the limits of their competencies, leaders (a) seek consultation from a diverse group, (b)
seek further training or education, or (c) engage in a combination of these.
References:
Connerley, M., & Pedersen, P. (2005). Leadership in a diverse and multicultural environment: Developing awareness,
knowledge, and skills. Sage Publications, Inc.
Larentis, F., Antonello, C. S., and Slongo, L. A. (2019). Inter-organizational culture: Linking relationship marketing with
organizational behavior. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
Mind Tools Content Team (n.d.). Mentoring. In Mindtools. Retrieved 29 September 2020 from
https://www.mindtools.com/pages/article/newCDV_72.htm#:~:text=Mentoring%20is%20a%20relationship%20bet
ween,person%2C%20or%20%22mentee.%22
Robbins, S.P., & Judge, T.A. (2018). Essentials of organizational behavior (14th ed.). Pearson Education Limited.