ABSTRACT

Nigeria gained her freedom in October 1960, presently after sixty years of British pioneer rule.
The nation’s journey into nationhood was welcomed with high expectations and possibilities for
public solidarity, harmony and improvement. This was a direct result of its huge human and
material assets, and land mass. Nigeria is overwhelmingly made of three noticeable regions: the
North, the West and the East with minorities in different districts. The military assumed control
over the authority of the country scarcely six years into her autonomy as a country. The military
held influence for 29 years out of the underlying forty years of the nation’s post freedom history
before her re-visitation of democratic rule in 1999. Nigeria as a country has been been faced
with difficulties on all fronts going from weakness and rebellion, economy, political
vulnerability, discretionary acts of neglect, high pace of joblessness, helpless framework among
others. Scholarly writings have been slanted toward military intercession in legislative issues as
the main driver of Nigeria’s underdevelopment. This study review utilized subjective data. The
review examined the historical backdrop of military rule in Nigeria, grilled the essence of the
tactical establishment and variables that required their invasions. It further investigated
idiosyncrasies of various military regimes, their tactical systems and finished up with necessary
findings and recommendations.
Keywords: Nigeria, Military, Coup, Underdevelopment, Intervention.
INTRODUCTION

Nigeria’s jouirney to nationhood was invited by high expectations and improvement

possibilities having found raw petroleum in 1954. Also, Nigeria is additionally supplied with
high human and immense material assets. Tragically, for a long time of her post-freedom history,
Nigeria has stayed an underdeveloped nation battling with creating issues going from popularity
based combination to political vulnerability, frailty and insurrection, ethnic disturbance, poor
infrastructural improvement, high pace of destitution and joblessness, among others. A few
researchers, political elites and residents have kept on accusing the military as the reason for the
difficulties fighting with public turn of events and mix (Agagu and Ola, 2011). They contend that
the tactical intercession in the country’s legislative issues soon after autonomy and its long years
and style of administration of right around thirty years are generally liable for the issues
tormenting the country.

This they say depends on the way that the military isn’t chosen by anybody, and thus, its
mediation in the political course of a nation, even at a fringe level, is unsafe for the majority rule
cycle and responsibility. A portion of its other significant ramifications are as per the following:
the military might be associated with government because of a genuine threat to public power.
The present circumstance suggests the contortion of government strategy in light of the fact that
specific arrangement choices should be required and executed to meet this danger; for example, a
redistribution of financial plan for the military at the expense of other significant spending plan
allotments. The danger of a military takeover can constrain a chosen government to change its
strategy in accordance with the longings of the military or may even supplant it by another
administration more submissive to the desires of the military.

On the off chance that a military takeover, or a danger of takeover, demonstrates failure
of the current government to work viably then the economy will present high dangers for
unfamiliar organizations and a full-scale military system represents the most serious danger.
(International Country Risk Guide, 2008). Conversely, a few researchers contend that the
military as a legislative establishment left a few additions for the nation in spite of its
undemocratic rule. As Fawole, 2019 posits, ‘It is fascinating to take note of that the job of the
military in Nigerian governmental issues has been a repetitive talk among researchers, the
political and administering elites, the military and residents even following twenty years of post-
military rule in the country. The peculiarity of military rule in governmental issues didn’t start in
Nigeria in spite of the fact that it is currently viewed as a relic of days gone by in light of the fact
that the military’s contribution in legislative issues is viewed as a variation and undemocratic.

A review by two US scientists, Jonathan Powell and Clayton Thyne, has distinguished
more than 200 such endeavors in Africa since the last part of the 1950s. A large portion of these
have been effective – characterized as enduring over seven days. Burkina Faso, in West Africa,
has had the best overthrows, with seven takeovers and just one failed attempt. Jonathan Powell
says this isn’t shocking given the precariousness African nations experienced in the years later
freedom. “African nations have had conditions normal for overthrows, similar to neediness and
poor monetary execution. It isn’t unexpected that when a nation has one overthrow, that is
frequently a harbinger of more upsets.” The African Development Bank (AfDB) recorded in
excess of 200 military overthrows in Africa since the post-autonomy period of the 1960s, with
45% of these being fruitful.

BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Most underdeveloped nations in Africa, Asia and Latin America have had their portion of
military rule. In any case, the resulting effect of military rule on the Nigerian political scene has
kept on producing discusses attributable to its extended stay in power, the association of resigned
military officials in post-military rule and the country’s powerlessness to solidify her democratic
system and subsequent improvement following twenty years of continuous popularity based
insight. Military mediation in Nigerian political issues traces all the way back to the colonial
times. The country’s first Governor-General, Lord Lugard, was a British military official. He
was liable for the administration of the Lagos Colony, the Northern and the Southern
Protectorates into a solitary element named Nigeria by his better half.

At the point when the military assumed control over the apparatuses of government in
Nigeria in 1966 to check the drift towards disorder and crumbling looking straight at the country
at this period. The political heads of the principal republic (1960-66) had shown awkwardness,
parochialism, bad form and degenerate inclinations in the treatment of public issues and these
had reared genuine distance of the majority just as broad disappointment to such an extent that
the rulers had basically lost authenticity following five years in office. Also, the notion of
prebendal governmental issues and ethnic patriotism divergently affected the country as it has
been mentioned already. Issues of public significance like census registration and decisions
before long became wellsprings of disagreement and emergencies of genuine aspects. This was
the foundation to military invasion into Nigerian governmental issues. Until as of late the
presumption for the most part was that the military has a few ascribes which makes it an
expected integrative power. This isn't without some sane premise. Writing on the military during
the 1960s and 1970s depicted the association as nationalistic and its work force as rigid, devoted,
detribalized and committed modernizers (Janowitz, 1964). These accepted characteristics were
normally promoted upon by Third World armed forces to send off themselves into political
issues. In any case, as obvious from late works in the field these characteristics were either
misrepresented or over summed up while thinking about the circumstance in Africa (Ajayi,
2007). In the particular instance of Nigeria, the military ended up being "bad, penetrated by
secret social orders and insurance rackets" (Dent, 1978). What's more as will be uncovered later
it additionally ended up being an instrument of sub-patriotism particularly in its treatment of
ethno-strict issues and portion of public assets. These negative qualities will be explained below.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

From the beginning of independent government in Nigeria in 1960 to the furthest limit of
1990, the military had administered for 21 years. Out and out there were five coup d’état
including changes of government: those of January 15, 1966; July 29, 1966; July 29, 1975;
December 31, 1983; and August 27, 1985. There was additionally an unsuccessful coup in which
the head of state, General Murtala Muhammad, was killed in February 1976, and one more was
stopped from the beginning in December 1985. An endeavor to topple General Ibrahim
Babangida was made in April 1990. Of these coups, just those of January 1966 and December
1983 were against non military personnel states. The tactical mediation has been ascribed to a
few reasons to the side the significant reasons given by the overthrow plotters themselves.
The job of the military in a democratic rule setting unarguably ought to be confined to the
conventional job of safeguarding peace and lawfulness and guarding the power of the country.
This ought to exclude direct takeover of the political interaction, as it has been the situation with
a lot of Nigeria's post-freedom history. Nigeria was naturally introduced to a majority rules
government at independence; however the underlying foundations of a majority rule government
were yet to grow when the military struck and held onto the political framework from regular
citizen rule under the appearance of a rescue mission to disinfect the nation of defilement, ethnic
disquietudes and electing somersaults. As Dent (1978, referred to in Anugwom, 2001)
contended, the military in Nigeria came to power with the communicated aim of going about as a
restorative system. In any case, this case has been plainly blamed, as just the military system of
Mohammed/Obasanjo can make a case for have filled this restorative role. Truth be told,
Nigeria's political history has shown that in any event, when the military come to power as
remedial system, there is dependably intrinsic risk of the debasement of military power.

Thus, it is accepted that the justification behind the tactical association in governmental
issues is the way that, the Nigerian armed force was politicized from the get-go in the country's
set of experiences as an independent country (Ikpe, 2000). The long stretches of military rule
saw the steady change of rebellion into a political custom that made entrenchment of majority
rule beliefs into Nigeria's political framework an impractical objective. Additionally, Anugwom
(2001) presented that: The military has overwhelmed post-autonomous Nigeria in the political
field and is to a great extent liable for the present political, monetary and social
underdevelopment of the country. These imperfections influence Nigeria's improvement asides
monetary advancement that has escaped Nigeria. The country's a majority rules system has a
checkered history. From the initial republic through the delayed imperious military systems and
the shortened second and third republics to the present democratic based regulation, a majority
rules government has experienced crippling encounters in the country.

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Methodology alludes to the standards, techniques, and procedures of examination utilized

in a review for social event data, investigating information, and making inferences. There are
general class of philosophy like subjective strategies and quantitative techniques; specific kinds
of approaches, for example, study research, contextual investigation, and member perception,
among numerous others (Alexandra Hrituleac, 2010). Research Methodology is a method for
discovering the aftereffect of a given issue on a particular matter or issue that is likewise alluded
to as research issue. In Methodology, scientists utilize various standards for addressing and
looking through the given exploration issue. Various sources utilize distinctive sort of techniques
for tackling the issue. It suggests an aggregate term for the organized course of directing
exploration. There are a wide range of techniques utilized in different kinds of exploration and
the term is generally considered to incorporate examination plan, information social affair and
information investigation.

Research techniques are by and large utilized in scholastic examination to test

speculations or hypotheses. A decent plan ought to guarantee the examination is legitimate, for
example it obviously tests the theory and not superfluous factors, and that the examination is
dependable, for example it yields steady outcomes without fail. Part of the exploration system is
worried about the how the examination is directed. This is known as the review plan and
normally includes research led utilizing polls, meetings, perception and additionally explores.
The idea of this examination work requires the need to utilize enlightening overview
investigation which will be mostly through secondary data sources. The information for this
review are generally gotten from experimental sources, connecting with the historical backdrop
of military intercession in Nigeria dating from the 1960 to the beginning of the Fourth Republic,
while the optional wellspring of information for this exploration work is basically from the web,
libraries, distributed and unpublished journals, magazines, and research papers. The securing of
the review on subjective information investigation essentially implies that the information
gathered were dissected utilizing intelligent contention and successive show of points and facts.

DEFINITION OF TERMS

Military organization: The appreciation of military organization relies upon the execution of
the distinctive military systems Nigeria has encountered. Military proposes "professionals in the
usage of ammunition with the ultimate objective of battling" (Uzodinma, 2015). This,
nonetheless, explains why the diverse military organizations were tyrant and fierce in nature.
They are arranged faculty for war and they can't grasp the democratic based techniques for
organization. The tactical organization is an organization driven by military trailblazers. It is
overall considered an irregularity of organization and an invalidation of political progression.
The tactical organization is an organization overpowered by military trailblazers (Eminue, 2006).

Economic development: this is the most extraordinary instrument for diminishing destitution
and upgrading the individual fulfillment in developing countries (Anyiwe and Aigbokhaevbolo,
2006). Context oriented examinations affirms that speedy and even development is essential to
acquiring speedier ground towards the Millennium Development Goals and not just the
important goal of lessening the worldwide degree of people living on under $1 per day (Anyiwe
and Aigbokhaevbolo, 2006). Economic development, generally, includes improvement in the
degree of monetary action and the assistant difference in the various regions in the midst of the
methodology of financial turn of events.

LITERATURE REVIEW

REASONS FOR MILITARY COUPS

As an establishment the military has numerous supports for seeking political office.
Firstly, the military is more inclined to the notion of increased military spending and having a
portion of public assets. Contextual analyses regularly note that this is one of the justification for
a military incursion control over an ascent in military uses is confirmed, for example, an ascent
in pay rates, new military equipment are requested, and new offices are given to the officials and
their families. A second justification behind the job of military in political issues is basically the
upkeep and endurance of the military inside a nation and this is regularly seen when endeavors
are made to sabotage military order. For instance, on account of Brazil, President Goulart
attempted to counter the force of top military officials and therefore was toppled by the military
in April 1964 (Eric A Nordlinger, 1977). The military likewise engages in political power in the
event that a legislator, who was eliminated by the military in past, becomes elected once more. A
third justification behind military association in governmental issues is dread of public breaking
down. For instance, military officials regularly contend that their intercession in political issues
is important on the grounds that elected officials are wasteful, bad and unequipped for
administering a nation and thus the nation is tormented by far and wide political, monetary and
social problems.

But as it has been observed in Nigeria, military regimes often times tend to be more
wasteful and bad as their democratically elected counterparts. A fourth justification for military
contribution is the expansion of the idea of 'public safety' to incorporate interior protections.
Militaries do not just devise military procedures and tenet for facing homegrown rebellion
however they are likewise intrigued by the social and political reasons for insurrection. In
nations where democratic officials are overwhelmed with day to day administrations, the military
comes to power trying to standardize their job as observed in Nigeria.
TABLE: Military Regimes in Nigeria

S/NO Date of Coup The Head of State Duration of Regime

1. Jan. 15th 1966 Major Gen. J.T.U Aguiyi Jan. 15th - July 29th 1966
Ironsi
2. July 29th 1966 Gen. Yakubu Gowon July 29th 1966 - July 29th
1975
3. July 29th 1975 Gen. Murtala Mohammed July 29th 1975 - Feb 13th
1976
4. Feb. 14th 1976 Gen. Olusegun Obasanjo 14th Feb. 1976 - 1st Oct.
1979
5. Dec. 31st 1983 Major Gen. M. Buhari Dec. 31st 1983 - Aug 27th
1995
6. Aug. 27th 1985 Gen. Ibrahim B. Babangida Aug 27th 1985 - Aug 25th
1993
7. Nov. 17th 1993 Gen. Sani Abacha Nov. 17th 1993 - June 9th
1998
8. June 9th 1998 Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar June 9th 1998 - May 29th
1999

MILITARY REGIMES AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN NIGERIA

It is no question a well established fact that the Nigeria military feasibly affects the
financial improvement of the country during the period they governed (Bamgboye, 2014). The
different financial arrangements were focused at increasing the living expectation just as working
on the monetary development of Nigeria. Albeit the different military systems were additionally
described by defilement and monetary wastage, one can’t yet recognize the effect which a
portion of their strategies had on the development and advancement of the country monetarily.
Later the common conflict, the Federal Military Government moved to resuscitate the six-year
advancement plan started in 1962. The First National Development Plan laid out Nigeria’s
change from a fundamentally agricultural economy to a mixed economy considering agrarian
augmentation and obliged current turn of events. The public authority was overwhelmingly
drawn in with the economy because secretly made private hypothesis couldn’t deliver
satisfactory capital for advancement. New advancement plans were started in 1970 and 1975,
Oyewale and Osadolor(2018) nonetheless, the destinations set in all of the three plans showed
vulnerability. While a portion of these plans are short-reach and medium-range plans, others are
viewpoint and moving arrangement.

Despite the fact that to a degree, there have been a few indications of progress; these
endeavors have been full of challenges that have risen up owing to dependence on western
models acquired from their previous colonial powers. These improvement models have been
established in the colonial advancement plans. (Oyewale and Osadolor, 2018) By the last part of
the 1960s, oil had displaced cocoa, peanuts, and palm oil as the country’s most noteworthy
unfamiliar trade worker (Olomola, 1969). In 1971, Nigeria became the world’s seventh-greatest
oil maker and gained membership into the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries
(OPEC). The rise in oil prices in 1974 caused an abrupt flood of wealth, that turned out to be
disastrous or in what scholars termed as “dynamic disturbance.” Much of the pay was proposed
for theory to upgrade the economy, yet it moreover actuated development and, coming in the
midst of unfathomable joblessness, highlighted incongruities in management of finances by the
military.

In 1975 oil production fell distinctly due to the unexpected decrease in world solicitation,
and expenses moved downwards until the point that late in the year when OPEC interceded to
raise costs (Soetan and Osadolor, 2018). In 1972 the government provided an indigenization
policy. At that point, around 70% of business firms working in Nigeria were owned by
foreigners. In 1975 the central government bought 60% of the worth of shares of the critical oil
corporations in Nigeria, yet full nationalization was not enforced. (James, 1958).

Aside enactment of policies without proper assessment of peculiarities of the Nigerian

state, military regimes in Nigeria have had a negative impact in the following areas; mass
corruption, devaluation of human rights, abuse of power, economic decadence, collapse of
financial institutions, huge economic disparities among citizens, it has also harmed Nigeria’s
image which has resulted in pervasive underdevelopment. Each military regime that took power
during these twenty years vowed to change the economy and better the existences of the standard
Nigerians by giving better instruction and executing sound monetary strategies. With this said,
each regime seemed to have the vision of improvement and sound financial strategies, however
most of them did not have the ability to execute such vision because of an assortment of reasons:
First, each came up short on the political will to carry out their purported explanatory plans.
Second, following a couple of long stretches of acquiring state power, the avarice factor crawled
into the ranks of people with great influence and at last adulterated their feeling of thinking. At
long last, inner and outside competitions redirected their concentration and made them focus
increasingly more on safeguarding their administration by whatever implies as opposed to
zeroing in on delivering on promised better administration.

OVERVIEW OF MILITARY REGIMES IN NIGERIA

The Gowon Regime

Notwithstanding the campaign against pay off and debasement, the Gowon organization
has been portrayed as one of the systems that couldn’t battle corruption in the country. A portion
of the curious attributes of the system were: Graft, pay off, nepotism “gift” giving through which
influence and authority were stated. It was accounted for that In 1973, the national government
set up an exceptional anticorruption police power called the “X-Squad”, whose ensuing
examinations showed shrewd types of coercion and misrepresentation in government and public
enterprises as well as in personal business and in the callings overall. One stupefying debasement
outrage was uncovered during the 1970s; it included the “purchase of buy abroad of development
materials by state specialists at costs well above market esteems. Rake-offs were taken by open
authorities and private project workers”. Different outrages in emergency clinics and shelters
stunned the general population, while corruption in bringing in clinical medications whose
effective dates had long expired which put the wellbeing of Nigerians in danger (Aluko, 1977).

The Murtala Muhammed Regime

After the sack of the erring officers of the Gowon regime by Murtala organization in his
endeavor to clean and reorganize the civil service. The system of Murtala was a watershed in
establishing the framework of straightforwardness in authority, by truly battling corruption and
misuse of public office. The system didn’t keep going long, however before his death, Murtala
had begun making programs for political progress in to democratic rule. It was same planning to
a democratic rule government that Obasanjo proceeded, lastly brought Shagari to power. (Aluko,
1977)

The Shagari Regime

Shagari organization has been one of the most exceedingly awful systems with monetary
combatants in Nigeria. At the point when an examination board began testing some dubious
practices, most government structures bafflingly went ablaze but later agents began to observe
the finances of officials in those buildings (Juan, 1981). Also, in the late 1985, a test into the
breakdown of Johnson Mathey Bank of London cleared a way to the disclosure of a portion of
the abuses completed during the subsequent republic. The bank went about as a delegate to move
hard money for some party individuals in Nigeria. A couple of ruling authorities and lawmakers
siphoned Nigerian cash which they looked to move out of the country with the assistance of
Asian shippers by giving import licenses. Thirdly, it was uncovered in 1981 that, a Rice
deficiency, prompted allegations of corruption against the NPN government. The case was
asserted to be protectionist in nature, as later Shagari’s political race, his administration chose to
shield the neighborhood rice rancher from imported items. Yet, allegations of preference and
government upheld theory were evened out against numerous authorities. (Juan, 1981)

The Buhari Regime

Buhari system arose to address the oddities and degenerative acts of Shagari system. The
subsequent republic being one of the most bad states Nigeria at any point had been. Buhari was
confronted with a test of capturing the bad leaders of Shagari organization. The councils set up in
May 1984 by the Buhari system to attempt the bad previous clergymen, lead representatives, and
lawmakers had uncovered numerous misappropriation of public asset. For instance between July
5th and 9th 1983, Chief Bisi Onabanjo, the previous legislative leader of Ogun State, along with
two different representatives were viewed as blameworthy for requesting illegal side installments
adding up to 2.8 million naira. Different representatives were cleared, however Chief Onabanjo
was condemned to 22 years in jail. (David, 1999)

Some governors from various states were likewise arraigned for various degrees of abuse
and they were similarly detained. Different instances of indictment included UmaruDikko, the
transport and aviation minister in the second republic that escaped to Britain. He was affirmed to
have amassed a fortune of more than one billion US dollars during scarcely three years in office.
Justice Sampson Uwaifo tribunal revealed that it recuperated over of 200 million Naira in cash,
land and vehicles, and in excess of 35 million naira from lawmakers, public officials, and project
workers. There was likewise fraud allegations at the ministry of telecommunications where ovr
50 million naira was been siphoned monthly. (David, 1999)

The Babangida, Abacha and Abdusalam Abubakar Regime

Corruption in Nigeria under these two regimes in Nigeria under these two systems had
built up speed. The two systems had methods of inviting and obliging corruption. For instance,
Babangida’s organization exculpated and delivered the second republic government officials that
were imprisoned for corruption by the Buhari regime. He likewise returned their seized
properties to them. This pattern, notwithstanding, has made pundits to make the derivation that
the system had legitimized corruption. The Okigbo board report uncovered that Babangida set up
a ‘devoted record’ into which the bonus from the gulf war was paid. The record held the amount
was about 12.4 billion US dollars however at the hour of enquiry just 206 million dollars were
left there. The two individuals who managed the records were Babangida and the then governor
of the Central Bank, the late AlhajiAbdulkadir Ahmed.

The Abacha system was not an exemption. He dealt with the Nigerian Central Bank like a
family property; He gave checks of billions of naira at whatever point he wished to; He was
recorded among the ten most corrupt world leader with 2-5 billion US dollars loot. There was
also 4 billion US dollars plundered cash in which the UK monetary administrations authority
arraigned fifteen British banks, and the 4-5 billion US dollars secret Nigerian obligation buyback
plot. Also, there was the 2.5 billion US dollars Ajaokuta steel obligation buyback plot including
Abacha’s ministers. Others included 80 million US dollars over installment to pursue Manhattan
Bank, 10 million US dollars inversion installment on Paris Club obligations and 27 million US
dollars to SACE of Italy. (Molulu, 2011)

Abdulsalam was additionally blamed for plundering Nigerian treasury, which happened
in his Maizube Holdings, which is an assortment of different organizations (homesteads,
bequests and a wide range of organizations). One of his most recent establishments is the
structure of MAIZUBE Estate in Abuja, Nigeria. The bequest has as of late been rented/leased
by Total for its staff. Also, Abdulsalam gave Israeli expatriates billions of naira to a development
that Nigeria could undoubtedly have done. The Israelis ultimately sub-contracted each part of the
development to Nigerian manufacturers, draftsmen, engineers, painters, and so on They just paid
out just 1/8 of what they were procured from general Abdussalam which further stalled anty
developmental drive in the country at that time. (Molulu, 2011)

THEORETICALl FRAMEWORK

A few hypotheses have been progressed by researchers to clarify the peculiarity of

military mediation in governmental issues. The focal contention maintained by practically every
one of the hypotheses is that the political designs of the nations concerned and the conspicuous
shortcoming of systems in such nations account generally for the rate of military intercession in
governmental issues (Adebisi, 1998). As a matter of first importance, the praetorian hypothesis
show this condition of primary rot in the political framework as a motivation for military
rebellion. It keeps up with that there should be the breakdown of the executive power as a reason
for the military to come to the political scene either by danger of power or real utilization of
power.

In addition to buttressing the place of the praetorian hypothesis, Janowitz (1964) set that
the “inner qualities” of the political framework, for example, the socio-cultural foundation of
military men, ability, vocation lines, inward friendly attachment and proficient and political
philosophy could be showed to clarify the tactical’s intercession in legislative issues. Likewise,
Huntington (1968) contended that tactical intercession happens on account of the overall
politicization of social powers and organizations, and regularly going about as having the
manifest liability to reestablish request among bunches seeking political power in the middle
conflicts on the real technique for settling clashes. Thus, Permutter (1981) illustrated that there is
a relationship between’s tactical interventionism and a country’s level of improvement.
Accordingly, a country with significant degree of advancement is probably going to have
exceptionally negligible, if not complete shortfall of, frequency of military rebellion.

Ekeh (1998) sees that the first legitimization for military rule in Nigeria emerged from
the case that the country’s considerate governmental issues were raucous and required a portion
of military discipline. The clarification for intercession can be found in the political, underlying
and institutional shortcoming of systems and states. The most probable clear impetus for military
intercession is system wrongness and powerlessness to get political help through the accessible
channels. This situation can be represented with the situation of the Third Republic under the
military system of General Ibrahim Babangida which made two ideological groups, drafted their
manifestoes and in the long run dissolved the decisions, consequently denying the future system
the required authenticity, so the military can have a reason for either holding unto power or
mediating in governmental issues.

As indicated by Adebisi (1998), the degree of improvement can be estimated as far as the
degree of innovative turn of events, political pluralism, a majority rules government, worldwide
status and regard, basic liberties records, examples of dispersion of riches and influence,
schooling and wellbeing advancement and so on which all establish essential signs of political
strength. For example, Nigeria’s first military overthrow happened at a time the nation was
battling with the undertaking of improvement subsequent to acquiring freedom from the British
colonialists. The attack of the military in the political field on January 15, 1966 was expected
generally to the previous variables of political and institutional precariousness.

The disappointment of the democratic government to adequately deal with the political
design of the country which was described by provincial political constructions prompting
serious ethnic issues that made the condition essential for the military to strike. Likewise, the act
of involving the military powers for absolutely affable issues supported and surprisingly hurried
the openness of the Nigerian military to political debasement, and the impulse to arrange
overthrow and coordinate a tactical junta.

For example, the military were utilized to suppress the emergency in Western districts,
the Tiv Riots, just as in the tactical tasks in the pained nations abroad, for example the Congo
emergency of the 1960 among others. Mill operator and Zimmennan (1987) nonetheless, have
contended that outer powers such extraordinary power legislative issues and globalization could
likewise add to mediation of the military in the political framework. The praetorian hypothesis
thusly expects that the tactical foundation is authoritative and should be totally detached from the
non military personnel popularity based domain.

In thirty years of military rule, the division between the military and citizens has
developed profoundly and terribly. It agonizingly reviews the harmful qualification among
colonizers and the colonized in provincial occasions. The Nigerian test with forcing military
discipline on citizens has set the country back tragically and, as other political endeavors, ought
to be resigned from contemporary public undertakings into history. Nigeria’s most prominent
setback streams from the powerlessness, or hesitance, of the military initiative and their
defenders to acknowledge the judgment that, as this imperfect analysis hauls itself on, much
harm is being done to a country that military rule had apparently emerged to protect. Every one
of these tested the actual premise of the military as a modernizing power (Ekeh, 1998). All the
more in this way, the Nigerian military has interceded severally and failed to transit to a vote
based system, as the scandalous abrogation of the June 12, 1993 decisions illustrates.

The disappointment of General Ibrahim Babagida to give up capacity to a democratically

chosen government and General Sani Abacha’s determination to become chosen President no
matter what clearly shows the glaring democratic based pretentions of the military and features
the misrepresentation of the modernizing drive of the military. It pardons the fundamental truth
that military rule of common populaces is ill-conceived and will definitely bear malicious fruits
(Ekeh, 1998).

CONCLUSION

With the inescapable level of corruption which was systematized by the military through
their mediation in Nigerian governmental issues, it is clear that Nigeria is lingering behind in
such countless parts of advancement. Be that as it may, the military have additionally attempted
their own best in keeping up with peace and lawfulness, particularly in Nigeria where civil war
conflict was fought from 1967 and 1970. Gowon system specifically had yielded an adequate
number of gifts to see that the solidarity of Nigeria was truly kept up with and foundations for
public unification were set up. The long periods of military rule in Nigeria and their effect can't
be wished away. The just about thirty years of post-autonomy, during which the military
controlled the elements of the nation characterized and formed the political direction of the
political tip top, and furthermore established the framework for public communication and
improvement. In spite of the fact that, there were regions the military were pronounced to have
done genuinely well, as infrastructural advancement, state creation and security. Some military
states even performed very well in economy, international strategy, among others. In
international strategy, the military did right by the nation and gave her a voice in the comity of
countries with the special case for the General Abacha's organization.
 Yet, the military might have accomplished more in infrastructural advancement. Along
these lines, the records of the military on basic liberty and corruption were horrendous and their
effect is as yet being antagonistically felt in the country. It is qualified to take note of the fact that
the military run administrations were effectively assisted by citizens and technocrats in running
the undertakings of the country. They helped in the plan and execution of strategy which molded
and characterized administration in the nation at all levels under military rule. Military rule in
Nigeria was an entire hodgepodge. The political and financial circumstance both home and
abroad at the time formed and impacted the different military states. The attitude of the Heads of
State to life and administration was additionally a main drawback in their approach to
governance.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

1. Confronting Democratic Backsliding: The global local area has been tame in reacting to
dangerous decisions in Benin, conflicted in handling defilement in Mali, and lopsided with
regards to service time restrictions Guinea and Cote d'Ivoire. While West Africa has
experienced the quickest decrease in political privileges and common freedoms, its
accomplices have focused on counterterrorism or vital contest with China and Russia over
vote based system advancement. This relapse has set the conditions for officers to hold onto
power or possibly use it as guise for military activity.
2. While it is difficult to foresee the beginning, occurrence, or achievement pace of a possible
military overthrow, yet by tending to some center monetary and sociopolitical issues,
legislatures could moderate the danger of such an occasion. At the end of the day,
administrations that give monetary freedoms to all residents and that establish the
empowering climate for poverty decrease might be the panacea to handle political
flimsiness.
3. There is need to build up and guarantee a type of democratic based government that depends
on the strengthening of standard citizens, with a strong detachment between the three shafts
of government (executive, legislative and judiciary), political pluralism, responsibility and
straightforwardness, and regard for common freedoms.
4. There is need to provide sustained measures of economic development and prosperity. This
will involve creating essential foundation (transportation, power, ICT, and water and
 disinfection); expanding the economy; building useful limits; improving exchange
arrangements for expanded pay creating openings; and transforming the monetary
framework for expanded admittance to method for creation and possible export.
5. There is need to likewise give equivalent instructive, professional and monetary
opportunities for all residents paying little mind to their social class, identity, sex or
topographical area. Supporting instructive and professional opportunities will assist with
tending to the huge youth joblessness challenge at present confronting the country, which is
distancing youth and making social estrangement. Strategies to support social incorporation
and social insurance, especially for those in far off areas and in run down settlements in the
urban communities. This will assist with smothering the flashes of social turmoil which can
be politically undermining and which might open the way to mediations like military
incursions.
 REFERENCES

Adebisi, M. A. (1998): “The Military and Democratic Transition in Nigeria,” in Rotimi

A., Olu A., &Yemi A., (eds.) Multi-disciplinary Perspectives in Nigerian Studies.
(Nathadex Publishers)

Agagu, A. and R.F. Ola, (2007). Development agenda of the Nigerian State, Lord.
Akure: Keynes Publishing.

Ajayi AI (2007). The Military and the Nigerian State, 1966-1993: A Study of the
Strategies of Political Power Control, Trenton, New Jersey: Africa World Press, Inc.

Ajayi AI, Jayeola-Omoyeni MS (2012). Koranic Versus Christian Mission Education

Systems and Uneven Educational Development in Nigeria, 1842-1977: National Policy on
Education to the Rescue? J. Arts Strat. Stud. 4:26-32.

Alexandra, Hrituleac (2011): The Effects of Colonialism on African Economic

Development: A comparative analysis between Ethiopia, Senegal and Uganda MSc
Dissertation in International Economic Consulting Aarhus University, Business and Social
Sciences, December.

Aluko, O. (1977). “Nigeria and Britain After Gowon”. African Affairs. Vol. 76, No. 304
July.

Anyiwe, M.A. and O. Aigbokhaevbolo, (2006). Democracy and economic growth:

Statistical evidence from Nigeria 1960-2002. Journal of Applied Sciences, 6(2): 257-265.
DOI https://doi.org/10.3923/jas.2006.257.265.

Bamgboye, P.O., (2014). The military and socio-economic development in Nigeria (1983–
1999). A critical appraisal. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23): 2340-2344.
DOI https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n23p2340.

David, U.E. and Okafor, E.E. (1999). “Anti-Corruption Reforms in Nigeria Since 1999:
Issues, Challenges and the Way Forward.” IFRA Special Research. Issue1, vol. 3, Ibadan.

Ekeh, P. (1998). Theory and Curse of Military Rule and the Transition Program:
University of Buffalo, New York.
Eric A Nordlinger (1977). Soldiers in politics: military coups and governments. Englewood
Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

James, S.C., (1958). Nigeria: Background to nationalism. California: University of

California Press.

Janowitz M (1964). The Military in the Political Development of New Nations: An Essay
in Comparative Analysis, Chicago and London: Phoenix Books.

Juan, de O. (1981). “Rice Shortage in Nigeria Brings Charges of Corruption”, The New
York Times, January 18. 34.

McGowon, P.J. (2003. African Military Coups D’tat, 19562001: Frequency Trends and
Distribution. Journal of Modern African Studies, 41 (3), PP. 339-370.

Molulu, N. (2011). “Abdulsalami Abubakar Builds MultiBillion Dollar Empire with his
Loots”. NRG Forum.

Olomola, I.G., (1969). Main trends in African history from earliest times to 1900.
Ibadan: Omolayo Press.

Soetan, S.O. and O.S. Osadola, (2018). Debt burden: A re-examination of its effects on
Nigeria’s nation building. Journal for Studies in Management and Planning, 04(01): 43-
50.